This is a modern-English version of Female Scripture Biography, Volume II: Including an Essay on What Christianity Has Done for Women, originally written by Cox, F. A. (Francis Augustus).
It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling,
and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If
you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.
Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.
Female Scripture Biography:
Including an Essay on What Christianity Has Done for Women.
By Francis Augustus Cox, A.M.
"It is a necessary charity to the (female) sex to acquaint them with their own value, to animate them to some higher thoughts of themselves, not to yield their suffrage to those injurious estimates the world hath made of them, and from a supposed incapacity of noble things, to neglect the pursuit of them, from which God and nature have no more precluded the feminine than the masculine part of mankind."
"It’s a vital kindness to women to help them recognize their own worth, to inspire them to see themselves in a better light, to prevent them from supporting the negative views that society has of them, and to encourage them not to shy away from pursuing noble ambitions, as both God and nature have not excluded women from such pursuits any more than they have men."
The Ladies' Calling, Pref.
The Ladies' Calling, Pref.
VOL. II.
BOSTON:
LINCOLN & EDMANDS.
1831.
Contents of Vol. II.
Congratulation of the angel Gabriel--advantages of the Christian dispensation--Eve and Mary compared--state of Mary's family at the incarnation--she receives an angelic visit--his promise to her of a son, and prediction of his future greatness--Mary goes to Elizabeth, their meeting--Mary's holy enthusiasm and remarkable language--Joseph informed of the miraculous conception by an angel--general remarks
Congratulations from the angel Gabriel—benefits of the Christian faith—comparison of Eve and Mary—the situation of Mary's family during the incarnation—she receives a visit from an angel—his promise of a son to her, along with a prediction of his future greatness—Mary visits Elizabeth, and their encounter—Mary's holy enthusiasm and notable words—Joseph learns about the miraculous conception from an angel—overall observations.
Nothing happens by chance--dispensations preparatory to the coming of Christ--prophecy of Micah accomplished by means of the decree of Augustus--Mary supernaturally strengthened to attend upon her new-born infant--visit of the shepherds Mary's reflections--circumcision of the child--taken to the temple--Simeon's rapture and prediction--visit and offerings of the Arabian philosophers--general considerations
Nothing happens by chance—events leading up to the coming of Christ—Micah's prophecy fulfilled through Augustus's decree—Mary miraculously strengthened to care for her newborn baby—shepherds' visit—Mary's thoughts—circumcision of the child—taken to the temple—Simeon's joy and prophecy—visit and gifts from the wise men—general thoughts
The flight into Egypt--Herod's cruel proceedings and death--Mary goes to Jerusalem with Joseph--on their return their Child is missing--they find him among the doctors--he returns with them, the feast of Cana--Christ's treatment of his mother when she desired to speak to him--her behaviour at the crucifixion--she is committed to the care of John--valuable lessons to be derived from this touching scene
The flight to Egypt—Herod's harsh actions and death—Mary travels to Jerusalem with Joseph—on their way back, their Child is missing—they find him among the teachers—he returns with them, the wedding at Cana—Christ's response to his mother when she wanted to talk to him—her reaction at the crucifixion—she is entrusted to John’s care—valuable lessons can be learned from this poignant scene.
Brief account of the extravagant regard which has been paid to the Virgin Mary at different periods--the names by which she has been addressed, and the festivals instituted to honour her memory--general remarks on the nature and character of superstition, particularly that of the Catholics
A short overview of the extravagant attention given to the Virgin Mary throughout different times—the titles she has been called and the festivals established to celebrate her memory—along with general comments on the nature and characteristics of superstition, especially as it relates to Catholics.
The angelic appearance to Zacharias--birth of John characters of Elizabeth and Zacharias--importance of domestic union being founded on religion, shown in them--their venerable age--the characteristic features of their piety--the happiness of a life like theirs--the effect it is calculated to produce on others--the perpetuation of holy friendship through immortal ages--the miserable condition of the irreligious
The angel's appearance to Zacharias—the birth of John, the characters of Elizabeth and Zacharias—the importance of a domestic union based on religion, as demonstrated by them—their advanced age—the distinct traits of their piety—the joy of a life like theirs—the influence it can have on others—the enduring nature of holy friendship through eternal ages—the unfortunate state of the irreligious
Introduction of Anna into the sacred story--inspired description of her--the aged apt to be unduly attached to life--Anna probably religious at an early period--Religion the most substantial support amidst the infirmities of age--the most effectual guard against its vices--and the best preparation for its end
Introduction of Anna into the sacred narrative—an inspired portrayal of her—the elderly tend to cling too much to life—Anna likely had a religious inclination from a young age—Religion serves as the most substantial support during the frailties of old age—the most effective protection against its vices—and the best preparation for its conclusion.
Account of Christ's journey through Samaria--he arrives at Jacob's well--enters into conversation with a woman of the country--her misapprehensions--the discovery of his character to her as a prophet her convictions--her admission of his claim as the true Messiah, which she reports in the city--the great and good effect--reflections
Account of Christ's journey through Samaria—he arrives at Jacob's well—enters into a conversation with a local woman—her misunderstandings—the revelation of his identity to her as a prophet—her realizations—her acknowledgment of his claim to be the true Messiah, which she shares in the city—the significant and positive impact—reflections
Jesus and John contrasted--the former goes to dine at the house of a Pharisee--a notorious woman introduces herself, and weeps at his feet--remarks on true repentance and faith, as exemplified in her conduct--surmises of Simon the Pharisee--the answer of Jesus the woman assured of forgiveness--instructions deducible from the parable
Jesus and John are contrasted—Jesus goes to have dinner at a Pharisee's house—where a well-known woman shows up and weeps at his feet. He comments on genuine repentance and faith as seen in her actions—Simon the Pharisee speculates about her—and Jesus assures the woman that she is forgiven. Lessons can be drawn from the parable.
Introductory observations--Christ could not be concealed the Syrophenician woman goes to him on account of her daughter--her humility--earnestness--faith--the silence of Christ upon her application to him--the disciples repulsed--the woman's renewed importunity--the apparent scorn with which it is treated--her admission of the contemptuous insinuation--her persevering ardour--her ultimate success--the necessity of being importunate in prayer--remarks on the woman's national character--present state of the Jews: the hope of their final restoration
Introductory observations—Christ couldn't be hidden. The Syrophoenician woman approaches Him for her daughter—her humility, earnestness, and faith shine through. Christ’s silence in response to her plea, as well as the disciples' rejection of her, highlight her determination. Despite the apparent disdain shown towards her, she acknowledges the contemptuous remark and continues to fervently plead. Her perseverance leads to success, demonstrating the importance of being persistent in prayer. Observations on the woman’s national identity and the current situation of the Jews are noted, along with the hope for their eventual restoration.
Bethany distinguished as the residence of a pious family, which consisted of Lazarus and his two sisters--their diversity of character--the faults of Martha, domestic vanity and fretfulness of temper--her counterbalancing excellencies--Mary's choice and Christ's commendation--decease of Lazarus--his restoration to life at the voice of Jesus--remarks on death being inflicted upon the people of God as well as others--the triumph which Christianity affords over this terrible evil--account of Mary's annointing the feet of Jesus, and his vindication of her conduct
Bethany was known as the home of a devout family made up of Lazarus and his two sisters. They had distinct personalities—Martha’s flaws included domestic pride and a short temper, but she also had admirable qualities. Mary made a significant choice that was praised by Christ. After Lazarus passed away, Jesus brought him back to life. There are observations about how death affects both the people of God and others. Christianity offers victory over this awful reality. The story also includes Mary anointing Jesus' feet and his defense of her actions.
Account of Christ's sitting over against the treasury--he particularly notices the conduct of an obscure individual--she casts in two mites--it is to be viewed as a religious offering--the ground on which it is eulogized by Christ--the example honorable to the female sex--people charitable from different motives--two reasons which might have been pleaded as an apology for withholding this donation she was poor and a widow--her pious liberality notwithstanding--all have something to give--the most trifling sum of importance--the habit of bestowing in pious charity beneficial motives to gratitude deduced from the wretchedness of others, the promises of God, and the cross of Jesus
Account of Christ sitting across from the treasury—he specifically observes the actions of an unknown person—she puts in two small coins—it is seen as a religious offering—the reason Christ praises it—this example is commendable for women—people give out of different reasons—two possible excuses for her not donating could be that she was poor and a widow—yet her generous spirit remains—everyone has something to give—even the smallest amount matters—the practice of giving in religious charity promotes feelings of gratitude influenced by the suffering of others, the promises of God, and the sacrifice of Jesus
Mixed constitution of the church of Christ--benevolent spirit of the primitive believers at Jerusalem--anxiety of Ananias and Sapphira to appear as zealous and liberal as others--Ananias repairs to the apostles to deposit the price of his possessions--is detected in deception and dies--similar deceit and death of Sapphira--nature and progress of apostasy--peculiar guilt of Sapphira--agency of Satan distinctly marked--diabolical influence ascertained--consolatory sentiments suggested to Christians
The mixed nature of the church of Christ—generous spirit of the early believers in Jerusalem—Ananias and Sapphira's desire to appear as devoted and generous as others—Ananias goes to the apostles to give the money from his possessions—he is caught in a lie and dies—Sapphira's similar deceit leads to her death—nature and progression of falling away from faith—specific guilt of Sapphira—clear influence of Satan—recognition of evil influence—comforting thoughts offered to Christians
Joppa illustrious on many accounts, particularly as the residence of Dorcas--she was a disciple of Christ--faith described as the principle of discipleship--the inspired testimony to the character of Dorcas--she was probably a widow or an aged maiden--remarks on reproaches commonly cast upon the latter class of women--Dorcas exhibited as a pattern of liberality, being prompt in the relief she afforded--her charities abundant--and personally bestowed: observations on the propriety of visiting the poor--the charities of Dorcas often free and unsolicited--wise and conducted upon a plan--the pretences of the uncharitable stated and confuted--riches only valuable as they are used in bountiful distribution
Joppa is notable for many reasons, especially as the home of Dorcas—she was a follower of Christ—faith is described as the core of discipleship—there are inspired testimonies about Dorcas's character—she was likely a widow or an older unmarried woman—comments on the criticisms often aimed at this group of women—Dorcas serves as an example of generosity, being quick to provide help—her charitable acts were plentiful—and given personally: thoughts on the importance of visiting the poor—Dorcas's charity was often given freely and without expectation—her actions were wise and well-planned—the justifications of the uncharitable are presented and refuted—wealth is only valuable when it is shared generously.
Account of Paul and his companions meeting with Lydia by the river-side at Philippi--the impression produced upon her heart by the preaching of Paul--the remarks on conversion, as exemplified in the case of this disciple--its seat the heart--its accomplishment the result of divine agency--the manner of it noticed: the effects of a divine influence upon the human mind, namely, attention to the word of God and the ordinances of the Gospel, and affectionate regard to the servants of Christ--remarks on the paucity of real Christians--the multiplying power of Christianity--its present state in Britain--efforts of the Bible Society
Account of Paul and his companions meeting Lydia by the riverside in Philippi—the impact Paul’s preaching had on her heart—the discussion about conversion, illustrated by this disciple’s experience—its source in the heart—its achievement as a result of divine intervention—the way it occurs is noted: the effects of divine influence on the human mind, including attentiveness to the word of God and the ordinances of the Gospel, as well as genuine care for the servants of Christ—comments on the scarcity of true Christians—the expanding influence of Christianity—its current situation in Britain—efforts of the Bible Society
Female Scripture Biography.
Vol. II
The Virgin Mary.
Chapter I.
Section I.
Congratulation of the Angel Gabriel--Advantages of the Christian Dispensation--Eve and Mary compared--State of Mary's Family at the Incarnation--she receives an angelic Visit--his Promise to her of a Son, and Prediction of his future Greatness--Mary goes to Elizabeth--their Meeting--Mary's holy Enthusiasm and remarkable Language--Joseph informed of the miraculous Conception by an Angel--general Remarks.
The Announcement from the Angel Gabriel--Benefits of the Christian Faith--Eve and Mary compared--Mary's Family Situation at the Time of the Incarnation--She Receives a Visit from an Angel--His Promise of a Son and Prediction of His Future Greatness--Mary Visits Elizabeth--Their Encounter--Mary's Spiritual Enthusiasm and Notable Words--Joseph is Informed of the Miraculous Conception by an Angel--General Comments.
"HAIL, THOU THAT ART HIGHLY FAVOURED, THE LORD IS WITH THEE! BLESSED ART THOU AMONG WOMEN!"
"Hail, you who are highly favored, the Lord is with you! Blessed are you among women!"
Such was the congratulatory language in which the commissioned angel addressed the virgin of Nazareth, when about to announce the intention of Heaven, that she should become the mother of Jesus; and such the strain which we cannot help feeling disposed to adopt, while recording her illustrious name, and contemplating this wonderful transaction.
Such was the congratulatory language the commissioned angel used when speaking to the virgin of Nazareth, about to announce Heaven’s intention for her to become the mother of Jesus; and such is the sentiment we can’t help but feel inclined to adopt while writing about her illustrious name and reflecting on this incredible event.
On Mary devolved the blessing which the most pious of women had for a long succession of ages so eagerly desired, and which had often created such an impatience for the birth of children, in some of whom they indulged the sublime hope of seeing the promised Messiah. In her offspring was accomplished the long series of prophecy which commenced even at the moment when the justice of God pronounced a sentence of condemnation upon rebellious man; and which, like a bright track extending through the moral night, and shining amidst the typical shadows of the Mosaic dispensation, fixed the attention of patriarchs, and prophets, and saints, for four thousand years:--and upon this otherwise obscure and insignificant female beamed the first ray of that evangelical morning which rose upon the world with such blissful radiance, and is increasing to the "perfect day."
On Mary fell the blessing that the most devout of women had long desired, creating a deep longing for the birth of children, in some of whom they nurtured the grand hope of seeing the promised Messiah. In her child was fulfilled the long line of prophecies that began the moment God's justice condemned rebellious humanity; and this journey, like a bright path shining through moral darkness and illuminating the symbolic shadows of the Mosaic law, captured the attention of patriarchs, prophets, and saints for four thousand years. Upon this otherwise ordinary and unremarkable woman shone the first light of that evangelical dawn, which rose on the world with such joyful brilliance and continues to grow toward the "perfect day."
Infidels may contemplate the manifestation with unholy ridicule or vain indifference; but we will neither consent to renounce the evidence afforded to the historic fact, nor cease to celebrate the mysterious miracle. We will unite with the impassioned angel, at least in the sentiment and spirit of his address; and join the high praises of the midnight anthem, sung by descending spirits in the fields of Bethlehem: "GLORY TO GOD IN THE HIGHEST, AND ON EARTH PEACE, GOOD WILL TOWARDS MEN!"
Infidels may regard the manifestation with disrespectful mockery or meaningless indifference; but we will not agree to deny the evidence of the historical fact, nor stop celebrating the mysterious miracle. We will come together with the passionate angel, at least in the feeling and essence of his message; and join in the high praises of the midnight song sung by descending spirits in the fields of Bethlehem: "GLORY TO GOD IN THE HIGHEST, AND ON EARTH PEACE, GOOD WILL TOWARDS MEN!"
In the course of Scripture history, we are now advanced to that period which the apostle emphatically denominates "the last days," in which "God, who at sundry times and in divers manners, spake in time past, unto the fathers by the prophets," speaks to us "by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds." Let us hear his voice, admit his claims, and bow to his dictates. As truth arises upon us with greater splendour, we shall find that character is formed to greater maturity under the immediate influence of "the ministration of righteousness" which "exceeds in glory." By the unparalleled transactions of this age we shall see the whole energy of the human mind drawn forth, and furnished with ample scope for exercise; all the faculties become ennobled and purified; and the female sex especially, from the days of Elizabeth and Mary to the close of the sacred record, becomes marked with a holy singularity. By the starlight of the former dispensation, we have discovered many women of superior excellence, availing themselves of all the means they enjoyed, and presenting a pre-eminence of character proportioned to their comparatively few advantages and imperfect revelation; but amidst the splendours of the "Sun of Righteousness" we shall witness, in the females who adorned this new era, a greater elevation of mind and advancement in knowledge.
In the history of Scripture, we have now reached that period which the apostle clearly calls "the last days," when "God, who spoke in various ways and at different times to our ancestors through the prophets," now speaks to us "through his Son, whom he has appointed as heir of all things, through whom he created the worlds." Let us listen to his voice, accept his claims, and follow his guidance. As truth shines upon us more brightly, we will find that character develops more fully under the direct influence of "the ministry of righteousness" that "surpasses in glory." Through the remarkable events of this age, we will see the full potential of the human mind unleashed, with plenty of opportunities for expression; all faculties become enriched and refined; and especially women, from the days of Elizabeth and Mary to the end of the sacred record, become distinguished by a unique holiness. By the light of the previous era, we have uncovered many women of outstanding quality who made the most of the opportunities they had, showcasing a character that reflects their relatively limited advantages and incomplete revelation; but in the brilliance of the "Sun of Righteousness," we will observe, in the women who graced this new era, a greater elevation of intellect and progress in knowledge.
Still it must be recollected, that the day only dawned, the shadows were not at first entirely dispersed; and although the favoured inhabitants of Judea and its vicinity saw the age of Christ, not like Abraham, "afar off," but in its commencing glory, their prejudices and prepossessions did but slowly melt away. Some degree of dimness remained upon the moral sight; and we are called to observe, not so much the accuracy of their conceptions as the fervour of their love.
Still, it should be remembered that the day had just begun; the shadows weren't completely gone yet. Even though the fortunate people of Judea and the surrounding areas witnessed the era of Christ—not like Abraham, who saw it "afar off," but in its early glory—their biases and preconceived notions took time to fade. Some level of obscurity lingered in their moral vision, and we are invited to focus not so much on how accurate their perceptions were but on the intensity of their love.
The two most extraordinary women that ever appeared in this world were unquestionably EVE, "the mother of all living," and MARY, "the mother of Jesus Christ." They occupied respectively the highest stations and the most critical points of time that ever fell to the lot of mortals; and they exhibit an instructive contrast. EVE lived at the beginning, and MARY at the "fulness of time."--EVE saw the glories of the new made world after creative Wisdom had pronounced it all "very good," and before sin had tarnished its beauty and disarranged its harmonies.--MARY beheld it rising from the ruins of the fall, at the moment of its renovation and in the dawn of its happiest day.--EVE was placed in the most glorious and conspicuous situation, and fell into a state of meanness and degradation.--MARY was of obscure origin and lowly station, but was raised, by a signal appointment of Providence, to the highest eminence.--EVE was accessary to the ruin of man--MARY instrumental in the birth of him who came as the Restorer and Saviour of mankind--EVE beheld the fatal curse first take effect, in overcasting the heavens with clouds, in withering the blossoms of paradise, envenoming the spirit of the animal creation, disordering the human frame, and ultimately destroying it, and introducing all the nameless diversities of wo which fill up the tragedy of human life.--MARY witnessed the beginning of that long series of blessings which divine love has for ages dispensed to man "through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus," and which will eventually replenish the cup of existence with unmingled sweetness and perfect joy.--EVE witnessed, with a trembling consciousness of guilt, the awful descent of those mighty "cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life," and which were placed "at the east end of the garden of Eden." MARY, with feelings of ecstatic rapture, beheld the angel Gabriel standing before her, with the smiles of heaven upon his countenance, heard his benedictions, and held "communion sweet" with the holy messenger. Wretched, wretched Eve! Happy, happy MARY!
The two most remarkable women to ever exist in this world were definitely EVE, "the mother of all living," and MARY, "the mother of Jesus Christ." They held the highest positions and were at the most critical moments in history; their stories offer a powerful contrast. EVE lived at the beginning, while MARY lived at the "fullness of time." EVE witnessed the beauty of the newly created world after it was declared "very good" before sin stained its perfection and disrupted its harmony. MARY saw the world rising from the aftermath of the fall, at the moment of its renewal and at the dawn of its brightest day. EVE was placed in a position of glory and prominence but fell into a state of dishonor and degradation. MARY came from humble beginnings but was elevated by a special act of Providence to the highest honor. EVE contributed to humanity's downfall, while MARY was instrumental in the birth of the one who came as the Restorer and Savior of humankind. EVE witnessed the terrible curse first take effect, darkening the sky, wilting the flowers of paradise, poisoning the spirit of creation, disturbing the human body, and ultimately leading to its destruction, introducing countless sorrows that fill the tragedy of human life. MARY saw the start of a long line of blessings that divine love has, for ages, offered humanity "through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus," blessings that will one day fill existence with pure joy and sweetness. EVE watched, acutely aware of her guilt, as those powerful "cherubims and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life" were placed "at the east end of the garden of Eden." MARY, filled with ecstatic joy, saw the angel Gabriel standing before her, his face radiant with heavenly smiles, heard his blessings, and shared "sweet communion" with the holy messenger. Poor, poor Eve! Blessed, blessed MARY!
The Jews have been always celebrated for their care in preserving their genealogies: in consequence of which it providentially happened, that the evangelists were able from their own authenticated records, to verify the ancient predictions of the birth of Jesus Christ. Two of the inspired historians have given a statement of his ancestry; the one tracing it from Abraham, and the other ascending to Adam; the one pursuing the line of Joseph, his reputed father, the other the line of Mary, his real mother; both concurring in the most decisive evidence of his being the Son of David and of Abraham, and the true Messiah of the prophets. [1]
The Jewish people have always been known for their diligence in maintaining their family trees. As a result, the evangelists were able to confirm the ancient predictions about the birth of Jesus Christ using their own verified records. Two of these inspired writers provided accounts of his lineage: one tracing it back to Abraham and the other all the way to Adam; one following the line of Joseph, his adopted father, and the other the line of Mary, his biological mother. Both agree on the strongest evidence that he is the Son of David and Abraham, fulfilling the role of the true Messiah as foretold by the prophets. [1]
Although in her distant ancestry Mary may justly be considered as of an illustrious descent, yet at the period of the incarnation, this family was in a very reduced state: the genealogical tree of David was cut down to its very roots, when the ancient prediction was accomplished respecting that great Personage who is represented "as a slender twig shooting out from the trunk of an old tree, cut down, lopped to the very root, and decayed; which tender plant, so weak in appearance, should nevertheless become fruitful and prosper."
Although Mary can be seen as having a prestigious lineage in her distant ancestry, at the time of the incarnation, her family was significantly diminished. The family tree of David had been reduced to its barest roots when the ancient prophecy about that important figure was fulfilled, who is described as "a slender twig shooting out from the trunk of an old tree, cut down, trimmed down to the very root, and decayed; this delicate plant, weak in appearance, would still become fruitful and prosper."
"But there shall spring forth from the trunk of Jesse,
And a cion from his roots shall become fruitful.
And the spirit of JEHOVAH shall rest upon him:
The spirit of wisdom and understanding,
The spirit of counsel and strength,
The spirit of knowledge, and the fear of JEHOVAH." [2]
"But from the trunk of Jesse, a shoot will grow,
And a branch from his roots will become fruitful.
The spirit of the LORD will rest upon him:
The spirit of wisdom and understanding,
The spirit of counsel and strength,
The spirit of knowledge and the fear of the LORD." [__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__]
But vain is the "boast of heraldry." It can avail nothing to elevate an insignificant character to eminence, or screen a guilty one from contempt. The evangelists have not recorded the lineage of Joseph and of Mary for the purpose of emblazoning their names, but solely to authenticate the prophetic declarations respecting Christ, to be connected with whom is real honour and solid glory. Of past generations, how many names, great in human estimation, have descended into oblivion, while those only will obtain an imperishable memorial, who are "written in the Lamb's book of life."
But the "boast of heraldry" is pointless. It doesn't help to raise an unimportant person to greatness or shield a guilty one from disdain. The Gospel writers didn’t record the family lines of Joseph and Mary to glorify their names, but only to confirm the prophetic statements about Christ, whose association brings true honor and lasting glory. Throughout history, how many names that seemed great to people have faded into nothing, while only those "written in the Lamb's book of life" will have a lasting legacy.
It must ever be deemed a noble distinction to have stood related to Christ "according to the flesh;" more so than to have been the sons and daughters of the mighty princes of mankind: but to have been his MOTHER was the sole honour of one happy female; still, however, less happy on this account, than because of the genuine humility with which she adorned her lowly sphere, and the lively faith with which she recognized the character of her Son.
It will always be considered a great honor to have been linked to Christ "in the flesh," even more so than being the children of powerful leaders of humanity. But being His MOTHER was the only true honor of one fortunate woman; still, she was even less fortunate for that reason than because of the genuine humility that adorned her humble life and the deep faith with which she understood who her Son was.
In reference to the genealogical tables of Matthew and Luke, it has been admirably remarked, "We observe among these ancestors of Christ, some that were heathens; and others that, on different accounts, were of infamous character: and perhaps it might be the design of Providence that we should learn from it, or at least should on reading it take occasion to reflect, that persons of all nations, and even the chief of sinners amongst them, are encouraged to trust in him as their Saviour. To him, therefore, let us look even from the ends of the earth; yea, from the depths of guilt and distress; and the consequence will be happy beyond all expression or conception." [3]
In looking at the family trees of Matthew and Luke, it's been well noted, "We see among Christ's ancestors some who were non-believers; and others who, for various reasons, had notorious backgrounds: and perhaps it is part of God's plan for us to learn from this, or at least to take the opportunity to think about how people from all backgrounds, even the worst of sinners among them, are encouraged to trust in him as their Savior. So, let us reach out to him, even from the farthest corners of the earth; yes, from the depths of guilt and suffering; and the result will be more amazing than we can express or imagine." [3]
In the apostolic epistle to the Hebrews, it is intimated as a fact, of pleasing notoriety, in the history of the church of God, that angels are "ministering spirits, sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation." When appointed by the great Supreme to this service, they usually adopted a human form and appearance, probably for the purpose of securing that degree of familiarity which the nature of their communications required, and which a more splendid manifestation would have precluded; in the scriptural accounts, however, of these remarkable visits to eminent saints in early ages, whether they appeared in numbers, as to Abraham, or individually, as on other occasions, no distinct mention is made of their names or order. But to impress a character of majesty and dignity upon the message, and upon all the circumstances of the divine communication to Mary, when an angel is commissioned to announce that she was selected by the wonderful providence of God as the mother of the Messiah, the name of the celestial messenger is recorded by the evangelist in a marked and solemn manner. It was the angel GABRIEL [4] one, as we may infer, of the highest order of those intelligences that "circle the throne rejoicing;" and the same glorious spirit who so many ages before had been sent to Daniel, to specify, in a prophetic enigma, the time of "MESSIAH THE PRINCE," which he now came to announce as having actually arrived.
In the apostolic letter to the Hebrews, it's stated as a well-known fact in the history of God's church that angels are "ministering spirits, sent to serve those who will inherit salvation." When assigned this role by the Supreme Being, they often took on a human form, likely to create a sense of familiarity that their messages required, which a more dramatic appearance could have disrupted. In the biblical accounts of these significant visits to prominent saints in ancient times, whether they appeared in groups, like to Abraham, or individually on other occasions, there's no clear mention of their names or rank. However, to add a sense of majesty and importance to the message and the circumstances of the divine announcement to Mary—when an angel was sent to tell her that she was chosen by God's extraordinary providence to be the mother of the Messiah—the name of the heavenly messenger is recorded by the evangelist in a notable and solemn way. It was the angel GABRIEL [4], one of the highest order of those beings that "circle the throne rejoicing," and the very same glorious spirit who, many ages earlier, had been sent to Daniel to specify, in a prophetic riddle, the time of "MESSIAH THE PRINCE," which he was now announcing had truly arrived.
Never did even an angel before convey so important a message, or descend to this earth with such rapturous sensations. It must ever, indeed, be considered the felicity of an angel, as well as of a man, to do the will of God, whether this obedience involve personal difficulty, or be accompanied with circumstances of peculiar delight. It must have afforded satisfaction to the mighty spirit who was despatched from heaven to eject the first parents of our race from the bowers of Eden, and to stretch his flaming sword across the path of access to the tree of life, as well as to that favoured angel who now hastened to the cottage of the virgin of Nazareth; because each was accomplishing a purpose in which he knew that the divine perfections were pre-eminently displayed; but as, in executing the will of God, the holiest of men must necessarily experience a different kind and degree of satisfaction, according to the nature of the service itself to which they are called; and as we have scriptural evidence that the inhabitants of the invisible world have peculiar sensations when sinners of the fallen race are converted to God; it is not surely an inadmissible sentiment, that, as never spirit was honoured before with such a message, Gabriel must have felt unusual joy upon announcing the incarnation of the Son of God. His very language expresses it. His address is full of pathos and congratulation. It breathes angelic rapture. With it we commenced this subject, and in some measure participating the bliss, we cite it again: "Hail, thou that art highly favoured, the Lord is with thee! Blessed art thou among women!"
Never before has an angel delivered such an important message or come to this earth with such joyful emotions. Truly, it must be a great happiness for both angels and humans to do God's will, whether that obedience brings personal challenges or comes with special joy. It must have brought satisfaction to the powerful spirit sent from heaven to cast out the first parents of our race from the gardens of Eden and to block access to the tree of life with his flaming sword, just as it did for the angel who hurried to the cottage of the virgin of Nazareth. Each was fulfilling a purpose where they saw God's divine qualities clearly displayed. However, when the holiest of men carry out God’s will, they must experience a different kind and level of satisfaction, depending on the nature of their service. Since we have scriptural evidence that the beings in the unseen world have unique emotions when sinners are converted to God, it’s not unreasonable to think that, since no spirit has ever been given a message like this before, Gabriel must have felt extraordinary joy when announcing the incarnation of the Son of God. His very words show this. His address is filled with emotion and celebration. It radiates angelic joy. We began this topic with it, and as we share in that bliss, we quote it again: "Hail, thou that art highly favoured, the Lord is with thee! Blessed art thou among women!"
There is nothing in the narrative to induce us to think that the angel assumed any extraordinary splendour of appearance on this occasion; and judging from the usual mode in which blessed spirits visited the sons of men in former times, as well as from a consideration of the tender age and lowly station of Mary, it is probable that he entered the room where she was, as an ordinary stranger. It is besides stated, that she was troubled at his saying, not at his appearance.
There’s nothing in the story to make us believe that the angel showed any extraordinary brightness or looks this time; and based on how heavenly beings typically visited people in the past, along with considering Mary’s young age and humble background, it’s likely that he came into the room where she was like a regular stranger. It’s also mentioned that she was disturbed by what he said, not by how he looked.
This salutation excited in the virgin's breast a sensation of astonishment mingled with apprehension. Among the Jews it was not lawful for a man to use any salutation to a woman, not even by a messenger, or her own husband; in addition to which, the panegyrical and congratulatory terms in which she was addressed, might well lead her to "cast in her mind what manner of salutation this should be."
This greeting sparked a mix of surprise and worry in the virgin's heart. Among the Jews, it was not acceptable for a man to greet a woman, not even through a messenger or her own husband. Plus, the flattering and congratulatory words used to address her could definitely make her wonder, "What kind of greeting is this?"
The benevolent messenger at once relieved her from the embarrassment into which he perceived she had been thrown, by familiarly calling her by name, renewing the solemn assurances of divine favour, and predicting the future glory of that illustrious Son whom she should bear, and whose description, being, like all the Jews, well instructed in the prophetic Scriptures, she would immediately recognize. These were his remarkable words: "Fear not, Mary; for thou hast found favour with God. And, behold, thou shall conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shall call his name JESUS. He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest; and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David. And he shall reign over the house of Jacob forever: and of his kingdom there shall be no end."
The kind messenger immediately eased her embarrassment by casually calling her by name, reassuring her of God's favor, and predicting the future greatness of the special Son she would bear, who she would easily recognize since, like all the Jews, she was well-versed in the prophetic Scriptures. He said: "Don't be afraid, Mary; you have found favor with God. You will conceive in your womb and give birth to a son, and you will name him JESUS. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord God will give him the throne of his ancestor David. He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and his kingdom will never end."
Her surprise was now raised to the highest pitch; and, incapable of comprehending by what means such a declaration could be fulfilled in her who was at present a virgin, she ventured to inquire of the angel, "How shall this be?" It is worthy of observation, that she did not instantly reject the testimony of her illustrious visiter as manifestly absurd and impossible, but modestly requested an explanation of the mysterious assurance. She was evidently one of those who "waited for salvation" in Israel; and who well knew that it was the province of human reason to submit, with implicit confidence, even to the most inexplicable statements of revelation.
Her surprise was now at its peak, and unable to understand how such a claim could be true for someone who was currently a virgin, she dared to ask the angel, "How will this happen?" It's important to note that she didn't immediately dismiss the testimony of her notable visitor as clearly ridiculous and impossible, but instead modestly asked for clarification on the mysterious promise. She was clearly one of those who "waited for salvation" in Israel and understood that it was the role of human reason to accept, with complete trust, even the most puzzling revelations.
It is true, she could not conjecture by what miraculous conception the angelic prediction would be verified; but she did not hesitate a moment to allow the apparently incongruous facts of his being her son, and yet the Son of the Highest, who should rise to the throne of David, and possess an everlasting kingdom. Her reason was confounded, but her faith triumphed; and though she knew not the manner, this was no sufficient evidence with her against the probability of the declared fact. Upon how many inferior occasions, and under far less mysterious circumstances have we been incredulous, deeming even the plainest declarations improbable, because they were unaccountable; and presuming to introduce some arbitrary alteration into the record of heaven, or some far-fetched comment, rather than humbly bow to supreme authority.
It’s true, she couldn’t figure out how the angel's prophecy would come true; but she didn’t hesitate to accept the seemingly contradictory ideas of him being her son and yet the Son of the Highest, who would take the throne of David and have an everlasting kingdom. Her reason was confused, but her faith prevailed; and even though she didn’t understand the how, that was not enough for her to doubt the probability of the declared fact. On how many lesser occasions, and under much less mysterious circumstances, have we been skeptical, considering even the simplest statements improbable because they were hard to explain; and thinking we could change the message from heaven or make some far-fetched interpretation instead of humbly submitting to supreme authority.
If, however, it were admitted that the question of Mary betrays at least a momentary incredulity, this was soon dispersed by the angel's reply: "The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee; therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee, shall be called the Son of God. And, behold, thy cousin Elizabeth, she hath also conceived a son in her old age; and this is the sixth month with her who was called barren. For with God nothing shall be impossible." In the exercise of lively faith and joy she answered, "Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it unto me according to thy word. And the angel departed from her."
If, however, we acknowledge that Mary had a moment of doubt, this was quickly cleared up by the angel's response: "The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore, the holy child to be born of you will be called the Son of God. And look, your cousin Elizabeth has also conceived a son in her old age; this is now the sixth month for her who was called barren. For with God, nothing is impossible." Filled with faith and joy, she replied, "I am the Lord's servant; let it be done to me according to your word." And the angel left her.
Let us endeavour to imitate the spirit of Mary. She acknowledged the power of God to accomplish the greatest, and, to her, the most inconceivable designs; and with unaffected simplicity, blended with humble and holy satisfaction, she received the divine word. Thus let us resign ourselves to the will of God, and confide in his most wonderful declarations. It is for mortals to believe, and not to cavil; when Jehovah speaks, to hear and to obey. Let us beware of stumbling at the promises through unbelief; and cherish increasing pleasure in the conviction, that he who sent his Son into the world to be the Saviour of men, will freely bestow upon his redeemed people all the blessings of time, and all the riches of eternity.
Let’s strive to embody Mary’s spirit. She recognized God’s power to achieve the greatest and, to her, the most unimaginable plans; and with genuine simplicity, along with humble and holy contentment, she embraced the divine message. Likewise, let’s surrender to God’s will and trust in His amazing promises. It’s for us as humans to believe, not to argue; when God speaks, we should listen and obey. Let’s be careful not to stumble over the promises due to doubt; and instead, find increasing joy in the belief that He who sent His Son into the world to save humanity will generously give His redeemed people all the blessings of this life and all the treasures of eternity.
It is observable, that on this occasion a young woman, though at first overawed by the heavenly manifestation, at length displayed a faith which shines with peculiar brightness, when brought into comparison with the sentiments of the aged priest Zacharias, when the same angel appeared to him a few months before, to communicate a prediction of far less apparent improbability.
It’s noticeable that on this occasion a young woman, though initially intimidated by the divine appearance, eventually showed a faith that stands out brightly, especially when compared to the feelings of the elderly priest Zacharias, who had the same angel visit him a few months earlier to share a prediction that seemed much less unlikely.
When this venerable man was burning incense on the golden altar before the Lord, and therefore in circumstances peculiarly favourable to the most elevated exercises of faith and devotion, Gabriel appeared to him, and gave him assurance that his frequent prayer for the redemption of Israel was heard, and that his aged partner should become in due time, the mother of a distinguished son, to be named John, who should be "great in the sight of the Lord," eminently useful in converting many of the children of Israel, and preparing their minds for the speedy approach of the Messiah; and yet it is stated, that Zacharias "believed not his words," in consequence of which he was smitten with dumbness till the birth of the child. But Mary, though so inferior in age, in situation, and in spiritual advantages, glorified God by a full acquiescence in his declarations; thus exemplifying what the grace of God can accomplish, even in the youngest persons, and the weakest sex. It must not indeed, be overlooked, that at first the language of Mary indicated a certain degree of hesitation and doubt, somewhat allied to the unbelief of Zacharias, although she eventually triumphed over every feeling of fear or of unbelief; and yet no sign of divine displeasure was given. May we not, therefore, take occasion to admire the discriminating goodness of God, who, while he does not "willingly afflict or grieve the children of men," proportions his chastisements to the demerit of the individual, and the circumstances of the case? The omniscience of the Searcher of hearts is perfectly acquainted with the secret workings of the mind, and measures with perfect discernment the exact delinquency of every thought and deed, when we can judge only by the appearance or the words of the individual.
When this respected man was burning incense on the golden altar before the Lord, in a moment particularly favorable for deep faith and devotion, Gabriel appeared to him and assured him that his ongoing prayers for Israel’s redemption were heard. He told him that his elderly wife would soon become the mother of a notable son, to be named John, who would be "great in the sight of the Lord," very effective in helping many of the children of Israel, and preparing their minds for the imminent arrival of the Messiah. Yet, it’s said that Zacharias "did not believe his words," and as a result, he was struck mute until the child was born. However, Mary, despite being younger, in a different situation, and having fewer spiritual advantages, praised God by fully accepting His message; this demonstrates what the grace of God can achieve, even in the youngest people and the more vulnerable gender. We shouldn’t overlook that at first, Mary’s response showed some hesitation and doubt, somewhat similar to Zacharias’ disbelief, although she eventually overcame her fears and doubts; and still, there was no sign of divine anger. Can we not, therefore, appreciate God's discerning kindness, who does not "willingly afflict or grieve the children of men," but matches His punishments to the individual's wrongdoing and the specific situation? The all-knowing Heart Reader fully understands the hidden workings of the mind and accurately measures every thought and action's faults, while we can only judge based on a person's outward appearance or words.
It is peculiarly gratifying to witness the beginnings of faith in the young, and especially in young females. It becomes their age and sex. It constitutes their best accomplishment, and their most shining ornament. Beauty is a fading flower, wealth a perishable treasure, and admiration "a puff of air;" but religion in the heart is an unfading inheritance. While so many vain and inconsiderate young women value themselves upon exterior charms and unmeaning flatteries, upon the symmetry of a face, the elegance of a form, and the decoration of a ribbon, may every female reader of these pages aspire after the nobler distinction of Mary, and by her undissembled piety afford pleasure to her parents, to her friends, to the church of God, and to those witnessing spirits, "in whose presence there is joy at the repentance of a sinner!"
It’s especially satisfying to see young people, particularly young women, beginning to embrace faith. It suits their age and gender. It’s their greatest achievement and their most beautiful quality. Physical beauty fades, wealth is temporary, and admiration is just a fleeting thought; but true faith in the heart is an enduring gift. While many superficial young women focus on looks, shallow compliments, nice facial features, a graceful figure, and stylish accessories, may every female reader of this text aim for the greater distinction of Mary, and through her genuine faith, bring joy to her parents, friends, the church, and those watching spirits “in whose presence there is joy at the repentance of a sinner!”
Immediately after the visit of the angel Gabriel to Mary, perhaps on the same day [5], she hastened to her cousin Elizabeth, the wife of Zacharias, who resided in that part of Judea called the hill-country, which extended from Bethoron to Emmaus. The purpose of this visit was to congratulate her pious relative on the singular mercy which she was informed by the angel she had experienced, in the promise of a son at her advanced period of life, and to communicate an account of the heavenly intercourse with which she had herself been favoured.
Immediately after the angel Gabriel visited Mary, possibly on the same day [5], she rushed to her cousin Elizabeth, the wife of Zacharias, who lived in the hill-country of Judea, stretching from Bethoron to Emmaus. The reason for her visit was to congratulate her devout relative on the unique blessing she had received, as the angel had told her about the promise of a son at her older age, and to share the details of the divine encounter she herself had experienced.
"Now theirs was converse such as it behoves
Man to maintain, and such as God approves"--
"Now their conversation was as it should be for a man to keep, and as God would approve."
worthy of the excellent characters who met, and calculated to confirm each other's hopes, and awaken mutual gratitude:
worthy of the excellent qualities of those who met, and intended to reinforce each other's hopes and inspire shared gratitude:
"Christ and his character their only scope,
Their object, and their subject, and their hope."
"Christ and his character are their only focus,
Their aim, their subject, and their hope."
If, when pious persons associate together, they have not to relate the visits of angels, or the miraculous interferences of Providence, it is surely in their power to diversify, enliven, and improve their social interviews, by some allusions to experimental religion, and some interchange of pious sentiment. The Christian world suffers incalculable loss by neglecting suitable opportunities for such communications, which might be eminently conducive to the great purposes of mutual comfort and instruction; for
If devout people come together and don’t have stories about angel visits or miraculous acts of God to share, they can still make their conversations more interesting and meaningful by discussing their personal experiences with faith and exchanging uplifting thoughts. The Christian community misses out on immense benefits by not taking advantage of these chances for conversations, which could greatly enhance mutual support and learning; for
"------What are ages and the lapse of time,
Match'd against truths, as lasting as sublime?
Hearts may be found, that harbour at this hour
That love to Christ, and all its quickening power;
And lips unstain'd by folly or by strife,
Whose wisdom, drawn from the deep well of life,
Tastes of its healthful origin, and flows
A Jordan for the ablation of our woes.
Oh days of heaven, and nights of equal praise.
Serene and peaceful as those heavenly days,
When souls drawn upwards, in communion sweet,
Enjoy the stillness of some close retreat,
Discourse, as if releas'd and safe at home,
Of dangers past and WONDERS YET TO COME,
And spread the sacred treasures of the breast
Upon the lap of covenanted rest."
"------What are ages and the passage of time,
Compared to truths that are both lasting and profound?
There are hearts that, at this moment,
Cherish love for Christ and all its revitalizing power;
And lips untarnished by folly or conflict,
Whose wisdom, drawn from the deep well of life,
Carries the essence of its healthy origin and flows
Like the Jordan for washing away our grief.
Oh, days of heaven, and nights filled with equal praise.
Calm and peaceful like those heavenly days,
When souls are uplifted, enjoying sweet communion,
Relishing the stillness of a close retreat,
Discussing, as if released and safe at home,
Past dangers and WONDERS YET TO COME,
And sharing the sacred treasures of the heart
Upon the lap of blessed rest."
COWPER.
COWPER.
As soon as Mary had reached the residence of Elizabeth, and saluted her, the babe, which the latter had conceived, leaped with unusual and supernatural emotion; and she became so filled with the Holy Spirit, as instantly to burst out in the most impassioned language, indicative of the glorious discovery, that Mary was the long predestined mother of Messiah. Although it seems probable that her husband, upon his return home, had informed Elizabeth (perhaps by means of writing, for he was still suffering that temporary dumbness which his unbelief had occasioned) of the vision he had seen at Jerusalem, and of the promise of the angel that he should have a son remarkably distinguished, especially as the precursor of the Saviour; yet till this moment she had no suspicion that her beloved relative was to be that illustrious mother, who should inherit the blessing of all future ages. Now a ray from heaven breaks upon the mysterious subject, and "the glory of the Lord" is risen upon this venerable matron. She pours forth unusual benedictions upon Mary, and congratulates herself upon the felicity of her own circumstances.
As soon as Mary arrived at Elizabeth's home and greeted her, the baby Elizabeth was carrying leaped with an unusual and supernatural excitement; and she was filled with the Holy Spirit, prompting her to immediately express in passionate words the incredible revelation that Mary was the long-predicted mother of the Messiah. Although it seems likely that her husband had informed Elizabeth about the vision he saw in Jerusalem and the angel's promise that they would have a remarkably special son, especially as the forerunner of the Savior, she had no idea until that moment that her dear relative would be the honored mother who would inherit the blessings for all future generations. Now a ray of light from heaven illuminated this mysterious topic, and "the glory of the Lord" shone upon this respected woman. She showered Mary with heartfelt blessings and felt joy over her own fortunate situation.
The generous nature of this joy is truly admirable, and worthy of imitation. Exempt from that envious spirit which is so predominant in the world, and so utterly subversive of the real interests and happiness of those who cherish it, Elizabeth congratulated her young relative upon the superior favour which Heaven had conferred upon her; and murmured not at the will of Providence, in assigning her so unexpected a pre-eminence. Her words were as follows: "Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb. And whence is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me? For, lo, as soon as the voice of thy salutation sounded in mine ears, the babe leaped in my womb for joy. And blessed is she that believed; for there shall be a performance of those things which were told her from the Lord."
The generous nature of this joy is truly admirable and worth imitating. Free from the envious spirit that is so common in the world and completely undermines the true interests and happiness of those who embrace it, Elizabeth congratulated her young relative on the greater favor that Heaven had granted her, and did not complain about the will of Providence in giving her such unexpected prominence. Her words were as follows: "Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the fruit of your womb. And why am I so favored, that the mother of my Lord should come to me? For, as soon as I heard your greeting, the baby in my womb jumped for joy. And blessed is she who has believed that the Lord would fulfill His promises to her."
The same spirit which dictated the language of Elizabeth, animated the bosom of Mary with inspirations of a still higher order. Unable to restrain the vehement enthusiasm of her mind, she thus began:--
The same spirit that influenced the language of Elizabeth filled Mary with even greater inspirations. Unable to hold back the intense excitement of her thoughts, she began:--
MY SOUL DOTH MAGNIFY THE LORD, AND MY SPIRIT HATH REJOICED IN GOD MY SAVIOUR.
MY SOUL MAGNIFIES THE LORD, AND MY SPIRIT HAS REJOICED IN GOD MY SAVIOR.
The mother of Jesus here adopts the prophetic style, speaking of the future character of her illustrious Son as though he were already born, and had attained to that eminency to which he was predestined. She extols him as "God her Saviour," more enraptured with the hope of salvation through his name, than with the honour of her maternal connexion with him. We need feel no surprise at her assigning this title to her anticipated offspring, when we recollect that she was at the moment divinely inspired, and that she had been previously informed by the angel Gabriel of his being "the Son of the Highest." This was no doubt understood by the Virgin Mary as expressive of his divine personality. He did not, indeed, become the Son of God by his miraculous conception; but it was the reason of his being called so. Thus he is called the Son of God as raised from the dead, no more to return to corruption, but he was not constituted such by these events. It was a declaration of what he was antecedently to his conception by the overshadowing influence of the Holy Spirit.
The mother of Jesus here takes on a prophetic tone, speaking about the future nature of her remarkable Son as if he were already born and had reached the greatness he was destined for. She praises him as "God her Savior," more captivated by the hope of salvation through his name than by the honor of being his mother. It's no surprise that she gives this title to her expected child, considering she was divinely inspired at that moment and had been previously told by the angel Gabriel that he would be "the Son of the Highest." The Virgin Mary likely understood this as a reference to his divine identity. He didn’t, in fact, become the Son of God through his miraculous conception; rather, that is why he is called so. In this way, he is called the Son of God because he was raised from the dead, never to return to decay; however, he was not made such by these events. It was a declaration of what he was before his conception through the Holy Spirit's influence.
In Mary's exclamation, "magnifying the Lord," and "rejoicing in God her Saviour," are used as convertible terms, denoting the same sentiment and source of joy. And how rational and noble was this feeling! Where should an immortal creature seek happiness, but in God the Saviour? What are all the fleeting possessions and enjoyments of time, in comparison with the "pleasures" which are at his "right hand for evermore?" How awfully infatuated are those who aim to attain real felicity independently of the sovereign good!--Mary continues,
In Mary's exclamation, "magnifying the Lord," and "rejoicing in God her Savior," are used interchangeably, expressing the same feeling and source of joy. And how reasonable and uplifting was this feeling! Where should an eternal being seek happiness, if not in God the Savior? What are all the temporary possessions and pleasures of life compared to the "pleasures" that are at His "right hand forevermore?" How tragically misguided are those who try to find true happiness apart from the ultimate good!—Mary continues,
FOR HE HATH REGARDED THE LOW ESTATE OF HIS HANDMAIDEN: FOR, BEHOLD, FROM HENCEFORTH ALL GENERATIONS SHALL CALL ME BLESSED.
FOR HE HAS LOOKED AT THE HUMBLE STATE OF HIS SERVANT: FOR, LOOK, FROM NOW ON ALL GENERATIONS WILL CALL ME BLESSED.
This is the language both of piety and inspiration. It implies that sense of the divine condescension which characterizes humility, intimating the unmerited nature of the mercy she had experienced, as well as her unexpected elevation from the lowest condition. She states, that it is her happiness, and not her excellences, for which she anticipated the congratulations of succeeding times. She was conscious that the honour and the glory belonged to God, and that the felicity of her circumstances, not the merit of her character, deserved admiration. It was neither the glory of her descent, nor the multitude or splendour of her virtues, that attracted the regards of Heaven, and influenced the movements of Providence in passing by the palaces of greatness to the cottage of Mary: but "so it seemed good in his sight:" and while, with impious vanity of spirit, many are flattering themselves that their imaginary virtue will recommend them to the notice, and secure the favour of Omniscience, it will be found, to their ultimate confusion, that "this" only "is life eternal, to know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent."
This is the language of faith and inspiration. It reflects that sense of divine humility, acknowledging the unearned mercy she felt, as well as her unexpected rise from a lowly status. She mentions that it is her happiness, not her excellences, for which she looks forward to the praise of future generations. She recognized that the honor and glory belonged to God, and that the joy in her situation, not the worthiness of her character, deserved admiration. It wasn’t the glory of her background or the number or brilliance of her virtues that drew Heaven's attention and led Providence to pass by grand palaces to reach Mary’s humble home: it was simply "what seemed good in his sight." Meanwhile, while many foolishly indulge in vanity, convinced their imagined virtues will attract God's notice and ensure his favor, they will ultimately find, to their dismay, that "this" alone "is life eternal, to know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent."
FOR HE THAT IS MIGHTY HATH DONE TO ME GREAT THINGS; AND HOLY IS HIS NAME.
FOR HE WHO IS POWERFUL HAS DONE GREAT THINGS FOR ME; AND HOLY IS HIS NAME.
There is a singular propriety, in thus introducing the sanctity of the divine nature and character. In the production of that body which was "prepared" for the Son of God, nothing of the infection of sin, which attaches to the corrupt nature of man, was suffered to stain "the holy child Jesus." He was, indeed, "in all things made like unto his brethren, yet without sin." Although his miraculous conception did not exempt him from human infirmities, it prevented the possibility of his being contaminated by human guilt.
There is a unique appropriateness in introducing the holiness of the divine nature and character this way. In the creation of the body that was "prepared" for the Son of God, nothing of the taint of sin, which is part of human nature, was allowed to touch "the holy child Jesus." He was truly "made like his brothers in every way, yet without sin." While his miraculous conception did not shield him from human weaknesses, it ensured that he couldn't be corrupted by human guilt.
The name of God is frequently mentioned in Scripture; and, in general, we are to understand by it the revelation of his character, by whatever methods, to his intelligent creation; and to hallow or pronounce it holy, is devoutly to adore every such discovery. His name is written on the works of nature, but shines with pre-eminent lustre in the wonders of redemption; and the spirit of ardent devotion traces all these manifestations in order to pay a suitable homage to them. To pronounce the name of God holy, is then virtually to attribute to the Supreme Being a grandeur and a majesty perfectly unique, and which distinguishes him from all other beings in the universe.
The name of God is often mentioned in Scripture; and, generally, we should understand it as the revelation of His character to His intelligent creation, through whatever means. To hallow or declare it holy is to sincerely worship every such revelation. His name is present in the works of nature but shines most brightly in the wonders of redemption; and the spirit of passionate devotion recognizes all these manifestations to give them the respect they deserve. Declaring the name of God as holy essentially means attributing to the Supreme Being a uniqueness and majesty that sets Him apart from all other beings in the universe.
AND HIS MERCY IS ON THEM THAT FEAR HIM, FROM GENERATION TO GENERATION.
AND HIS MERCY IS ON THOSE WHO FEAR HIM, FROM GENERATION TO GENERATION.
The spirit of Mary takes an elevated station, looking back upon past ages, and anticipating the glory of future times. The incarnation of Christ is represented as an act and an evidence of divine mercy, not only to her, but to all who by the fear of God are interested in this new dispensation. The promise of a Saviour was almost coeval with the world; and during the long succession of ages which had since elapsed, and the infinite diversity of events, so perplexing to the human eye and so apparently fortuitous, the love of God was pursuing its high purpose. The frequent intimations given to the ancient patriarchs, and to the prophets of Israel, proved that the eternal Ruler of the universe was producing, by a vast series of preparatory means, the last and best days of time, when the "Sun of Righteousness" should rise upon the world "with healing beneath his wings." An omnipotent arm was incessantly accomplishing the determinations of an omniscient mind. No power could impede the march of his mercy to the predestined point; no casualties defeat his great design; and no lapse of years, or revolution of centuries, diminish the ardour of infinite love, to secure the felicity of his people. The Lord was never "slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness;" for it must never he forgotten, in estimating the movements of eternal Providence, that "one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day."
The spirit of Mary occupies a high place, looking back on the past and looking forward to the glory of the future. The incarnation of Christ is seen as an act and proof of divine mercy, not just for her, but for everyone who reveres God and is invested in this new way of life. The promise of a Savior was nearly as old as the world itself; and throughout the long history that has followed, with its countless events that seem chaotic and random to us, God's love has been pursuing its grand purpose. The repeated messages given to the ancient patriarchs and the prophets of Israel showed that the eternal Ruler of the universe was preparing, through a vast array of means, the final and greatest days when the "Sun of Righteousness" would rise upon the world "with healing in his wings." An all-powerful force was continually executing the plans of an all-knowing mind. No power could stop the flow of His mercy to its destined goal; no chance events could derail His great plan; and no passage of years or change of centuries could lessen the passion of infinite love to ensure the happiness of His people. The Lord was never "slow in fulfilling His promise, as some people think of slowness;" because it’s important to remember, when considering the workings of eternal Providence, that "one day with the Lord is like a thousand years, and a thousand years like one day."
But this language is not merely, nor, perhaps, chiefly retrospective. Those who fear God in all ages, participate the mercies dispensed to man through an incarnate Redeemer. Under the Christian dispensation in particular, they are fully communicated, and will enrich the people of God to the end of time. The thousands and myriads of the human race, that apply to "the fountain opened for sin and uncleanness," cannot diminish its efficacy or exhaust its fulness; but the last preacher that exists upon the earth previous to that final hour, when "the trumpet shall sound and the dead shall be raised incorruptible," will be able to proclaim the blood of Jesus Christ the Son of God, as cleansing "from all sin," with equal confidence to that which inspired the first herald of these "glad tidings to perishing sinners." HE HATH SHOWED STRENGTH WITH HIS ARM; HE HATH SCATTERED THE PROUD IN THE IMAGINATION OF THEIR HEARTS.
But this language isn't just looking back; it's also about the present and future. Those who fear God throughout history share in the blessings given to humanity through an incarnate Redeemer. Specifically, under the Christian faith, these blessings are fully available and will continue to enrich God's people until the end of time. The countless people who turn to "the fountain opened for sin and uncleanness" can't lessen its power or run it dry; even the last preacher on Earth before that final moment, when "the trumpet shall sound and the dead shall be raised incorruptible," will be able to confidently proclaim the blood of Jesus Christ, the Son of God, as cleansing "from all sin," just as boldly as the first messenger of these "good news to lost sinners." HE HATH SHOWED STRENGTH WITH HIS ARM; HE HATH SCATTERED THE PROUD IN THE IMAGINATION OF THEIR HEARTS.
The omnipotence of God has been manifested in many remarkable instances during past ages, but in no case so illustriously as in the birth of Christ. All the other mighty operations of Jehovah are surpassed in this unparelleled event. The haughty Jews, who fondly but foolishly cherished the expectation, that the Messiah would be born of some one of the most opulent families in Judea, and conduct them to conquest and dominion, will be inexpressibly disappointed to find him the child of an obscure virgin, betrothed to a carpenter, and an inhabitant of the contemptible town of Nazareth in Galilee. So wonderfully "are the ways of God above our ways, and his thoughts above our thoughts!"
The power of God has been shown in many incredible ways throughout history, but none as impressively as in the birth of Christ. All other great acts of God pale in comparison to this unique event. The proud Jews, who naively hoped that the Messiah would come from one of the wealthiest families in Judea and lead them to victory and power, will be profoundly disappointed to discover that he is the child of an unknown virgin, engaged to a carpenter, and from the humble town of Nazareth in Galilee. Truly, "God's ways are higher than our ways, and his thoughts are higher than our thoughts!"
HE HATH PUT DOWN THE MIGHTY FROM THEIR SEATS, AND EXALTED THEM OF LOW DEGREE. HE HATH FILLED THE HUNGRY WITH GOOD THINGS, AND THE RICH HE HATH SENT EMPTY AWAY.
HE HAS BROUGHT DOWN THE POWERFUL FROM THEIR THRONES, AND LIFTED UP THE LOWLY. HE HAS FILLED THE HUNGRY WITH GOOD THINGS, AND SENT THE RICH AWAY EMPTY.
The providence of God has been often displayed in the depression of the most distinguished from their temporal elevations, and in the advancement of the most despised to dignity and renown. The necessitous have been liberally supplied: while those who have been possessed of the most ample and enviable abundance, have sometimes, by unexpected reverses, become destitute. This sovereign disposal of human affairs has been apparent, both in temporal and spiritual concerns. The Virgin Mary was herself, as she intimates a remarkable exemplification of such an interposal; while those who in Israel were "hungering and thirsting after righteousness," beheld in her infant son, that child whose name was to be called "Wonderful, Counsellor, the mighty God, the everlasting Father, and the Prince of Peace," and whose manifestation in the flesh afforded the sublimest satisfaction to their waiting spirits.
The providence of God has often been evident in bringing down the most distinguished from their lofty positions and in raising up the most despised to dignity and fame. The needy have been generously provided for, while those who had the most abundant and envied wealth have sometimes, through unexpected reversals, become destitute. This sovereign management of human affairs has been clear in both worldly and spiritual matters. The Virgin Mary herself, as she suggests, is a remarkable example of such divine intervention; while those in Israel who were "hungering and thirsting after righteousness" saw in her infant son the child known as "Wonderful, Counsellor, the mighty God, the everlasting Father, and the Prince of Peace," whose coming in the flesh brought the deepest satisfaction to their waiting souls.
HE HATH HOLPEN HIS SERVANT ISRAEL, IN REMEMBRANCE OF HIS MERCY; AS HE SPAKE TO OUR FATHERS, TO ABRAHAM, AND TO HIS SEED FOR EVER.
HE HAS HELPED HIS SERVANT ISRAEL, IN REMEMBRANCE OF HIS MERCY; AS HE SPOKE TO OUR FATHERS, TO ABRAHAM, AND TO HIS DESCENDANTS FOREVER.
All the true Israel of God are now admitted into his paternal protection, whether Jews or Gentiles; for the promises made to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and to David, of whose family was Mary, could never be forgotten by him who "rejoiced in the habitable parts of his earth, and his delights were with the sons of men." Never can the pious mind recur, without emotions of the liveliest gratitude, to such predictions as the following, which now seem to approach their glorious accomplishments; "I will make of thee (Abraham) a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing. And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee; and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.... And I will establish my covenant, between me and thee, and thy seed after thee, in their generations, for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee."
All of God's true people are now welcomed into His loving protection, whether they are Jews or Gentiles; because the promises made to Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and David—of whose family Mary was a part—can never be overlooked by the one who "delights in the earth and enjoys being with humanity." The faithful mind cannot reflect on such predictions without feelings of deep gratitude, especially those that now seem close to fulfillment: "I will make you (Abraham) a great nation, and I will bless you, and make your name great; and you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and curse anyone who curses you; and through you, all families of the earth will be blessed... And I will establish my covenant with you and your descendants throughout their generations, as an everlasting covenant, to be your God and the God of your descendants."
Mary prolonged her visit to her aged friend and relative, three months; a period of their lives to which, no doubt, each would ever after recur with peculiar satisfaction. The family of Zacharias was not dulled by the formalities of ceremony, or disturbed by the riot of folly, but delightfully animated by the cheerfulness of religion. Their time, we may readily admit, was wisely employed; and their daily converse such as befitted those favourites of Providence, who knew the truth of God, and had enjoyed the honour of angelic visitations.
Mary extended her visit with her elderly friend and relative for three months; a time in their lives that they would undoubtedly look back on with great joy. The family of Zacharias was not weighed down by formalities or disrupted by chaos, but instead was lively and energized by the joy of their faith. It’s easy to say their time was well spent, and their daily conversations reflected those blessed by Providence, who understood God's truth and had the privilege of angelic visits.
The improvement of time ought to be our great and immediate concern. To this important duty we are urged by a consideration of the rapidity of its flight--the impossibility of its return--the bright examples of its proper use, which the records of inspiration furnish--the fatal consequences of squandering it away in useless, frivolous and criminal pursuits--the voice of reason--of conscience--of Providence--of Scripture--of disappointed infidelity and of triumphant faith--and the vast interests of eternity, with which the use of it is essentially connected. "Lord, so teach us to number our days, that we may apply our hearts unto wisdom."
The improvement of our time should be our main and immediate focus. We're motivated by the speed at which time passes—the impossibility of getting it back—the inspiring examples of how to use it well that we see in sacred writings—the serious consequences of wasting it on pointless, trivial, and harmful activities—the call of reason—of conscience—of divine guidance—of Scripture—of unfulfilled doubt and of victorious faith—and the enormous stakes of eternity that are closely tied to how we use it. "Lord, help us to number our days, so we can gain a heart of wisdom."
During all this time, Mary was only the betrothed wife of an obscure but conscientious person, named Joseph. This was a circumstance which occasioned him extreme perplexity, but tended to exhibit the strength of her faith. Joseph was fearful of her reputation, and meditated some plan of concealing what he supposed would be deemed the disgrace of his beloved partner; for the Jews, whose laws of marriage were very precise, considered infidelity to a betrothed husband in the light of adultery, and as therefore subjecting the person to its usual punishment. [6]
During all this time, Mary was just the engaged wife of a little-known but principled guy named Joseph. This situation caused him a lot of confusion but also showed how strong her faith was. Joseph worried about her reputation and thought about ways to hide what he feared would be seen as the disgrace of his beloved partner. For the Jews, whose marriage laws were very strict, cheating on an engaged husband was considered adultery, and it brought about the usual penalties. [6]
It does not appear that Mary explained to him the manner or occasion of her mysterious conception; but judging, perhaps, that it would seem incredible, she leaves the whole affair in the hands of Divine Providence. "Thus," as archbishop Leighton excellently remarks, "silent innocency rests satisfied in itself, when it may be inconvenient or fruitless to plead for itself, and loses nothing by doing so, for it is always in due season vindicated and cleared by a better hand. And thus it was here; she is silent, and God speaks for her."
It doesn’t seem like Mary explained to him how or why her mysterious conception happened; maybe she thought it would sound unbelievable, so she left the whole situation in the hands of Divine Providence. "In this way," as Archbishop Leighton wisely points out, "silent innocence is content within itself when it may be impractical or pointless to defend itself, and it doesn’t lose anything by doing so, because it is always justified and clarified at the right time by a greater force. And that’s what happened here; she stays silent, and God speaks for her."
This inexplicable mystery was revealed to Joseph in a dream. He was assured by an angel, that Mary should bring forth a son, and commanded to call his name JESUS, for he was to "save his people from their sins." His apprehensions being immediately dispersed, he obeyed the heavenly intimation, "to take unto him Mary his wife."
This puzzling mystery was shown to Joseph in a dream. An angel assured him that Mary would give birth to a son and instructed him to name him JESUS, because he would "save his people from their sins." With his worries immediately calmed, he followed the divine message and "took Mary as his wife."
This miraculous conception has ever proved the stumbling-block of infidelity; while, in the just convictions of Christians, it is to be regarded as one of the most glorious and indispensable peculiarities of our faith. Christianity is not answerable for those misrepresentations of this doctrine which result from the weakness or the wickedness of mankind, and which have so often exposed it to ridicule; but let the statement of Scripture be taken simply as it is--plain, perspicuous, untangled with the perplexities of controversy--and it will approve itself to the pious mind, not only as a fact, but as one of prime importance and obvious utility.
This miraculous conception has always been a challenge for those who doubt; however, for Christians, it is seen as one of the most glorious and essential aspects of our faith. Christianity is not responsible for the misunderstandings of this doctrine that come from human weakness or malice, which have often led to mockery; instead, let the message of Scripture be considered as it is—clear, straightforward, and free from the complications of debate—and it will resonate with the faithful, not just as a fact, but as one of great significance and clear benefit.
In demanding an explication of the manner in which the divine and human natures became united, or continue to subsist in indissoluble connexion in person of the Son of God, reason claims a prerogative to which she is by no means entitled; especially if the alternative be, either that reason shall be satisfied, or the statements of Scripture rejected. There exist facts relative to our own constitution as incomprehensible and contradictory to what, independently of experience, we should be induced to believe, as the miraculous conception and mysterious nature of Jesus Christ. The soul and body, distinguished for properties not only peculiar to each, but dissimilar, heterogeneous, and seemingly inconsistent, yet constitute one person. A man is at once material and immaterial, mortal and immortal.
In asking for an explanation of how the divine and human natures came together and continue to coexist in the person of the Son of God, reason is claiming a right that it does not actually have; especially if the choice is either to satisfy reason or reject the statements of Scripture. There are facts about our own nature that are just as puzzling and contradictory to what we would believe without experience, like the miraculous conception and mysterious nature of Jesus Christ. The soul and body, which have unique properties that are not only different but also seemingly inconsistent, still make up one person. A person is both material and immaterial, mortal and immortal.
It was expedient that the Son of God should become man, that he might set us an example, sympathize with our griefs, vanquish our enemies, and abolish death: and equally so that he should be coequal with God in order to procure salvation for the lost world by the merit of his atonement; otherwise his obedience must have been imperfect, his sufferings unsatisfactory, and his mediatorial character, by which he was allied to both parties, incomplete.
It was necessary for the Son of God to become human so that he could set an example for us, empathize with our struggles, defeat our enemies, and eliminate death. It was equally important for him to be equal to God to secure salvation for the lost world through the value of his sacrifice; otherwise, his obedience would have been flawed, his sufferings insufficient, and his role as mediator—connecting both parties—would have been incomplete.
This doctrine is practical, and not an abstract speculation, or an article of faith intended merely to fill up the outline of a system, and unconnected with any moral results. It is calculated to awaken our gratitude and kindle our love, by showing us the infinite goodness of God, who "spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all"--"who made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin, that we might be made the righteousness of God in him." It should further engage us to cultivate humility and patience. A view of the abasement of the Son of God should impress upon us a sense of the insignificance of all earthly glory, and the propriety of sustaining all the trials and deprivations of life with unrepining fortitude. "Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus; who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God; but made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: and being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross."
This teaching is practical and not just an abstract theory or a piece of faith meant only to complete a system with no connection to moral consequences. It is designed to inspire our gratitude and ignite our love by revealing the infinite goodness of God, who "did not spare his own Son, but gave him up for us all"—“who made him to be sin for us, even though he knew no sin, so that we could be made the righteousness of God in him.” It should motivate us to develop humility and patience. Understanding the humbling of the Son of God should make us realize how insignificant all worldly glory is and how important it is to face life’s trials and hardships with unwavering courage. "Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus; who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God; but made himself of no reputation, taking the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: and being found in the appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death, even the death of the cross."
This view of the incarnation of Christ is adapted also to promote charity; for, "though he was rich, yet for our sakes he became poor; that we, through his poverty, might be rich;" and it tends to elevate us above the meanness of temporal compliances, and the degradation of worldly lusts, by pointing out the dignity to which our nature is advanced, through having been assumed, and still being retained in its purified state by the Son of God. Let a holy ambition prevail, to live as those who possess such a relationship; and who, though at present disguised in the dress of poverty, are born to an inheritance of which no enemy can prevent your possession--"an inheritance incorruptible and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you, who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation."
This perspective on Christ's incarnation also encourages kindness; because, "though he was rich, he became poor for our sake, so that we, through his poverty, might become rich;" and it raises us above the pettiness of temporary compromises and the shame of earthly desires, by highlighting the dignity our nature has gained, as it has been embraced and is still maintained in its pure form by the Son of God. Let a holy ambition inspire us to live as those who share such a connection; and who, even if currently appearing in the guise of poverty, are destined for an inheritance that no enemy can take away—“an inheritance that is imperishable and pure and will never fade, reserved in heaven for you, who are protected by the power of God through faith for salvation.”
Section II.
Nothing happens by Chance--Dispensations preparatory to the Coming of Christ--Prophecy of Micah accomplished by Means of the Decree of Augustus--Mary supernaturally strengthened to attend upon her new-born Infant--Visit of the Shepherds--Mary's Reflections--Circumcision of the Child--taken to the Temple--Simeon's Rapture and Prediction--Visit and Offerings of the Arabian Philosophers--general Considerations.
Nothing happens by chance—Events leading to the arrival of Christ—Micah's prophecy fulfilled through Augustus's decree—Mary miraculously supported to care for her newborn—Visit from the shepherds—Mary's thoughts—Circumcision of the child—Taken to the temple—Simeon's joy and prophecy—Visit and gifts from the wise men of Arabia—General reflections.
Chance is a word which ought to be banished from the Christian vocabulary. It is utterly contradictory to reason, opposed to experience, and subversive of revelation. To suppose that he who created the world has wholly and forever abandoned it, is improbable; and to imagine that the regular movements of nature, and the course of events--the whole train of causes, and the incalculable variety of dependent consequences, are merely fortuitous, seems absurd as well as impious. Uncertain and confused as were the opinions of the pagan nations of antiquity, few of them totally denied some kind of superintending providence; and many of their ablest writers reasoned in defence of it in the most forcible manner. "What," said the emperor Marcus Antoninus, "would it concern me to live in a world void of God and without Providence?"
Chance is a word that should be removed from the Christian vocabulary. It completely contradicts reason, goes against experience, and undermines revelation. To think that the one who created the world has entirely and permanently abandoned it is unlikely; and to believe that the consistent patterns of nature and the flow of events—the entire chain of causes and the countless variety of interdependent outcomes—are just random feels both ridiculous and disrespectful. Although the opinions of ancient pagan nations were uncertain and mixed, very few outright denied some form of overseeing providence; and many of their best thinkers argued in favor of it very convincingly. "What," asked the emperor Marcus Antoninus, "would it matter to me to live in a world without God and without Providence?"
In order to form clear conceptions of this, and of every other subject connected with the peace of our minds and the immortal interests of man, we must apply to the Scriptures for information. Hope, conjecture, plausibility--all became pleasingly absorbed in the splendour of truth; which, with the brightness of a sun beam, writes upon the inspired page the doctrine of an universal and particular providence. It appears, indeed, so fundamental to the system of Christianity, and so consonant to the wisdom and goodness of God, that if it were possible to adduce "solid objections against its reality, one of the richest sources of consolation to the human race would be forever lost--some of our dearest hopes would be undermined, and despondency shed disastrous gloom over the whole scene of life. It is the happiness of Christians to know, that nothing can escape the eye, nothing can disarrange the schemes, or thwart the purposes, of the eternal mind; and that the same general law which regulates the flight of an angel, or the affairs of an empire, connects even the fall of a sparrow with the plans of heaven. It is their privilege to feel assured, that the events which appear contingent or accidental to us, are equally ordained with those which seem the most orderly and regular. The arrow may be shot at a venture, but the Supreme Ruler guides it through the air. So sings the poet;
To understand this, and everything else related to our peace of mind and the eternal interests of humanity, we need to turn to the Scriptures for insight. Hope, speculation, and possibilities all seamlessly blend with the brilliance of truth; like a sunbeam, it illuminates the inspired text with the doctrine of universal and personal providence. This concept seems so essential to Christianity and aligns so perfectly with God’s wisdom and goodness that if we could present "solid objections against its reality," we would lose one of the greatest sources of comfort for humanity—our most cherished hopes would be shaken, and despair would cast a dark shadow over life. Christians find joy in knowing that nothing escapes God's notice, nothing disrupts His plans, or interferes with His intentions; the same overarching principle that guides an angel's flight or the governance of an empire also connects the fall of a sparrow to divine plans. It is their right to be confident that the occurrences we see as random or accidental are just as ordained as those that appear most orderly and structured. An arrow might be shot thoughtlessly, but the Supreme Ruler directs its path through the air. So sings the poet;
"Through all the various shifting scene
Of life's mistaken ill or good,
Thy hand, O God, conducts unseen
The beautiful vicissitude.
"Through all the different changes
Of life's missteps or blessings,
Your hand, O God, guides unnoticed
The beautiful ups and downs."
All things on earth, and all in heaven,
On thy eternal will depend;
And all for greater good were given,
And all shall in thy glory end."
Everything on earth and in heaven,
Depends on your eternal will;
All was given for a greater good,
And everything will end in your glory.
These sentiments will receive additional illustration from the remarkable facts respecting the birth of Christ, which it will be now proper to notice. He who can imagine the correspondence observable between ancient predictions and the occurrences which mark the singular history before us to be mere casual or undesigned coincidences, must possess a mind strangely perverted by prejudice or mean in its conceptions--he must in reality believe greater miracles than he denies, and, in his zeal to be thought rational, become enthusiastic and fanatical, in admitting the most inconceivable absurdities. We hesitate not to say, that even upon the principles of reason there are more difficulties in denying a providence in all the circumstances connected with our Saviour's incarnation, than in allowing its active agency; and that here, the doctrine which is most consolatory is most true. Sophistry may attempt to poison or to stop the streams of spiritual comfort, but they will nevertheless flow with undiminished sweetness and abundance.
These feelings will be highlighted by the remarkable facts surrounding the birth of Christ, which we should now address. Anyone who can see the connections between ancient predictions and the events in this unique story as mere chance or random coincidences must have a mind clouded by bias or lacking in understanding—they truly believe in greater miracles than they deny, and in their eagerness to appear rational, they become enthusiastic and fanatical in accepting the most absurd ideas. We are not afraid to say that even based on reason, there are more challenges in denying a higher power in all the circumstances related to our Savior's birth than in accepting its active role; and that in this case, the most comforting doctrine is also the most true. Deception may try to poison or obstruct the sources of spiritual comfort, but they will still flow with the same sweetness and abundance.
The whole period of the past time ought to be considered as a vast preparatory dispensation; every circumstance in the history of the people of Israel essentially depended on each previous occurrence, and stood connected with each succeeding one. We perceive sometimes more distinctly by a prophetic light, sometimes more obscurely through the hieroglyphical characters of the Mosaic economy of types and shadows, a wonderful series of events, that guides the devout inquirer to "God manifest in the flesh;" and, if human penetration cannot always discover the bright concatenation, we feel assured that it exists, and is regularly maintained by supreme wisdom; as we infer from observing the commencement, or discovering some parts of the course, which a mighty river pursues through provinces and empires, that, although the whole may not be accurately ascertained, yet each part, whether it traverses subterraneous passages or pathless forests, is certainly and necessarily connected.
The entire period of the past should be seen as a huge preparatory phase; every event in the history of the people of Israel was fundamentally linked to each earlier event and connected to each following one. Sometimes we can see this more clearly with prophetic insight, and sometimes it’s more obscure through the symbolic aspects of the Mosaic system of types and shadows. This remarkable series of events leads the devoted seeker to "God made visible in the flesh." Even if human understanding can't always see the clear connections, we are confident they exist and are consistently upheld by supreme wisdom. Just as we can infer the beginnings or some parts of a powerful river's journey through lands and empires, we know that while the whole path may not be completely known, each part—whether it goes through hidden passages or uncharted forests—is definitely and necessarily linked.
The links of this marvellous chain of providence become more distinctly visible as we approach the last, and witness its glorious termination. Amongst other ancient prophecies, we have this very express declaration of Micah respecting the birth of Christ--a declaration which, after the lapse of seven hundred years, we are now to see verified: "Thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel, whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting."
The connections in this incredible chain of divine guidance become clearer as we approach the end and witness its glorious conclusion. Among other ancient prophecies, we have this specific statement from Micah about the birth of Christ—a statement that, after seven hundred years, we are now about to see fulfilled: "You, Bethlehem Ephratah, though you are small among the thousands of Judah, yet from you shall come forth for me the one who will be ruler in Israel, whose origins are from of old, from everlasting."
It has been related, that at the time of the miraculous conception, Joseph and Mary lived at Nazareth in Galilee, and still continued this residence. If the predicted child had been born in Nazareth, it is obvious that either he could not be the Messiah, or the prophet was not correct. The virgin mother, however, neither disbelieved the communications of Heaven, nor took any extraordinary measures, by a removal of her dwelling-place, to aid the accomplishment of a divine oracle. How she, an inhabitant of Nazareth was to be the mother of him whom so many ages had expected in Bethlehem, was indeed mysterious; and yet like Abraham, she hoped against hope; allied in faith, as well as by descent, to that eminent patriarch. Nothing could be more contradictory, to her anticipations than external appearances; but nothing could be more humble, more patient, or more indicative of lively faith in God, than her spirit and conduct. She believed the angel, and she left the event. What an illustrious example to her sex! what confidence in Providence! what trust in God! what a resignation of reason to revelation!
It has been said that at the time of the miraculous conception, Joseph and Mary lived in Nazareth in Galilee and continued to live there. If the predicted child had been born in Nazareth, it’s clear that either he couldn’t be the Messiah, or the prophet was wrong. However, the virgin mother neither doubted the messages from Heaven nor took any extreme steps, like moving away, to help fulfill a divine prophecy. How she, a resident of Nazareth, was to be the mother of the one whom so many generations had awaited in Bethlehem was truly mysterious; yet, like Abraham, she hoped against hope, linked in faith and lineage to that great patriarch. Nothing could have seemed more contradictory to her expectations than the circumstances surrounding her, but nothing demonstrated more humility, patience, or vibrant faith in God than her attitude and actions. She believed the angel and left the outcome in God’s hands. What an amazing example for her gender! What confidence in Divine Providence! What trust in God! What a surrender of reason to revelation!
Mark the event. Augustus, at this time emperor of Rome, suddenly published an edict for the registry, or enrolment of the empire; probably with a view to ascertain the state of his dependencies, to exact an oath of fidelity, and perhaps, to determine the amount of money which might be reasonably expected from each province in case of any future taxation. The whole empire being included in this decree, all the families were required immediately to repair to their respective cities, for the purpose of having their names distinctly recorded; and, as Joseph was lineally descended from David, he, with his espoused wife, went into Judea to Bethlehem, because it was the birth place and residence of their illustrious ancestor.
Mark the event. Augustus, who was the emperor of Rome at the time, suddenly announced a decree for the registration or enrollment of the empire. This was likely intended to assess the status of his territories, enforce an oath of loyalty, and possibly determine how much money could reasonably be expected from each province in case of future taxes. Since the entire empire was included in this decree, all families were required to go to their respective cities immediately to have their names officially recorded. Because Joseph was a direct descendant of David, he and his fiancée traveled to Judea, specifically to Bethlehem, as it was the birthplace and home of their distinguished ancestor.
At this remarkable crisis Mary was detained by the full accomplishment of the time for her delivery; "and she brought forth her first born Son, and wrapped him in swaddling-clothes, and laid him in a manger, because there was no room for them in the inn." Here then were fulfilled the prophetic descriptions of the place and circumstances of the Redeemer's incarnation. A virgin produces a son--a son who, by the exclusion of his parents from the accommodation of the inn, already began to realize the inspired declaration, "he is despised and rejected of men"--a son identified as the promised Messiah by every thing connected with his birth. Augustus issues a decree which brings Mary to Bethlehem at the precise moment when this removal was requisite; and yet Augustus, ignorant of the designs of Heaven or the condition of Mary, considers only his personal glory and the security of the imperial dominions. He has one purpose, and Providence another; but they both concur to the predestined end. Augustus knew not that his edict was to prove the appointed means of accomplishing the most important event that had ever transpired since the commencement of time, and was, in fact, the wonderful hinge upon which the numerous and concurring prophecies of past centuries were destined to turn. He knew not that his imperial edict for an universal enrolment, was the last of a series of preparatory means by which the great purposes of infinite mercy were to be developed and displayed. Why was not the same policy pursued by the emperor, when it was determined upon seven-and-twenty years before at Taracon in Spain? and why, if he were diverted at that period from the immediate execution of this project by some disturbances in the empire, was it forgotten or neglected for so many years, and revived at so critical a moment? Let infidelity stand abashed, and listen to the voice of revelation: "He worketh all things after the counsel of his own will."
At this significant moment, Mary was ready to give birth. "She gave birth to her first son, wrapped him in cloth, and laid him in a manger because there was no room for them at the inn." This fulfilled the prophetic descriptions of the place and circumstances of the Redeemer's birth. A virgin gives birth to a son—one who, by being turned away from the inn, already begins to show the inspired message, "he is despised and rejected by men"—a son recognized as the promised Messiah by everything related to his arrival. Augustus issues a decree that brings Mary to Bethlehem at exactly the right moment for this to happen; yet Augustus, unaware of Heaven's plans or Mary's situation, focuses only on his own glory and the security of his empire. He has his own goals, and Providence has another, but their paths meet at the destined outcome. Augustus didn't realize his edict would be the chosen means to achieve the most significant event in history and was, in fact, the pivotal point around which the many prophecies of the past centuries were meant to revolve. He didn’t know that his imperial order for a universal registration was the last of a series of preparations through which the great purposes of infinite mercy would unfold. Why did the emperor not follow the same approach when it was first decided twenty-seven years earlier in Taracon, Spain? And why, if he was distracted from executing this plan due to disturbances in the empire, was it forgotten or overlooked for so long before being revived at such a critical moment? Let skepticism be silenced, and listen to the message of revelation: "He works all things according to the counsel of his own will."
How often has the supreme Disposer made use of those agents to accomplish his purposes, who were themselves the last to acknowledge his superintendence, or perhaps the first to oppose his will! How consolatory to the Christian to reflect, that the passions of the human mind, the madness of ambition, the rage of envy, the misrule of tyrannic power, the animosity of persecution, the decrees of princes, the events of war and of peace, the elements of nature, and the powers of the invisible worlds, are under the perfect control of God! A Pharaoh shall cause his "name to be declared throughout all the earth," by giving occasion to the most transcendent miracles, and the most direct and indisputable interference of Omnipotence--a Cyrus shall pursue a wonderful career of conquest; victory after victory shall enhance his fame; nations shall be subdued, and gates of brass broken before him, for the sake of Israel the elect of God, and Jacob his servant--an Augustus shall unconsciously fulfil a divine decree by means of an edict of his own--the Roman empire shall be enrolled, that Jesus may he born in Bethlehem.
How often has the supreme Disposer used those agents to achieve his goals, who were often the last to recognize his guidance, or maybe even the first to resist his will! How comforting for the Christian to remember that the emotions of the human mind, the madness of ambition, the anger of envy, the oppression of tyrannical power, the hostility of persecution, the decisions of rulers, the outcomes of war and peace, the forces of nature, and the powers of the unseen world are all under God's perfect control! A Pharaoh will ensure that his "name is declared throughout all the earth" by giving rise to the most extraordinary miracles and the most direct, undeniable acts of Omnipotence—a Cyrus will embark on an incredible journey of conquest; victory after victory will boost his fame; nations will be defeated, and gates of bronze will crumble before him, all for the sake of Israel, God's chosen people, and Jacob, his servant—a Caesar will unknowingly carry out a divine plan through his own edict—the Roman Empire will be registered so that Jesus can be born in Bethlehem.
It appears that Mary was supernaturally strengthened to perform the necessary duties to her infant charge, in the cold and comfortless situation in which she was thrown. No one seemed at hand to commiserate her sufferings, to supply her wants, or to assist her weakness. Her own life was endangered; but maternal tenderness struggled for the life of her firstborn, and a divine faith in God and his promises sustained her amidst the privations of her desolate abode. Let not his people permit despondency to becloud their days or extinguish their hopes; but, relying on his assurance, "As thy day is, so thy strength shall be"--an assurance so remarkably verified in the mother of Jesus, and so often corroborated by the experience of Christians--let them imitate the patience and faith of this illustrious woman, who was at once the ornament of religion and the glory of her sex.
It seems that Mary was given supernatural strength to take care of her infant in the harsh and uncomfortable circumstances she faced. No one was around to empathize with her pain, meet her needs, or help her when she was weak. Her own life was at risk, but her maternal instinct fought for the life of her firstborn, and her deep faith in God and His promises kept her going through the hardships of her lonely situation. Let not His followers allow despair to cloud their days or kill their hopes; instead, trusting in His promise, "As your day is, so your strength shall be"—a promise clearly fulfilled in the mother of Jesus and often confirmed by the experiences of Christians—let them embody the patience and faith of this remarkable woman, who represented both the beauty of faith and the honor of her gender.
Every thing is marvellous in this sacred story. No sooner was this child introduced into the world, than his virgin mother received an unexpected visit in her lonely dwelling. A company of shepherds came, with unceremonious eagerness, to her asylum. Mary and Joseph were together in the stable, conversing doubtless, upon this astonishing birth; and probably might have been alarmed at the intrusion of strangers. Were they come to remove them from this poor lodging, as they had been already excluded from the inn, and occupy their places?--were other barbarians come to pour the last drop into the cup of maternal wo, by expelling Mary, her husband, and her offspring, from their wretched, but still acceptable shelter? If this were the case--if, when the strangers obtruded, these had been the just apprehensions of the afflicted family, they knew where to find consolation; and she who held the babe in her arms, and pressed it to her bosom, was no doubt prepared to adopt a similar strain with that by which Simeon afterward proclaimed his ecstasy--"Lord, now lettest thou thy servant depart in peace, for mine eyes have seen thy salvation." But fear not, Mary! It is no ruffian band that approaches thee! These are no idle strangers, impelled by a vague curiosity; but they are the commissioned messengers of Providence and the ambassadors of peace! They have heard "glad tidings," and they are come to verify the visions they have seen, and to renew the joys they have felt!
Everything is amazing in this sacred story. As soon as this child was born, his virgin mother got an unexpected visit in her lonely home. A group of shepherds arrived, eager and without ceremony, to her refuge. Mary and Joseph were together in the stable, likely discussing this astonishing birth, and they may have felt alarmed at the arrival of strangers. Were they here to take them from this humble lodging, since they had already been turned away from the inn, and take their places?—were more outsiders coming to add to the sorrow of this mother by forcing Mary, her husband, and their child from their meager, yet still comforting shelter? If this was the case—if, at the intrusion of these strangers, such were the genuine fears of the troubled family, they knew where to find comfort; and she who held the baby in her arms, pressing it to her chest, was surely ready to echo the words that Simeon later proclaimed in his joy—“Lord, now you let your servant go in peace, for my eyes have seen your salvation.” But do not be afraid, Mary! It’s not a band of thugs approaching you! These are not curious strangers; they are the appointed messengers of Divine will and the ambassadors of peace! They have heard “good news,” and they have come to confirm the visions they have seen and to refresh the joys they have felt!
In the neighbouring fields these shepherds were watching their flocks by night; when suddenly an angelic messenger made his appearance in a blaze of celestial light. They were of course astonished and alarmed; but, from the first, perceived it was no illusion of the senses, since all distinctly saw, and were equally affected by the splendid reality. The benevolent spirit bade them dismiss every apprehension, and proceeded to open his glorious commission. It consisted of an assurance, that in the city of David the long-predicted Messiah was actually born, and on that very day; [7] and that this was the sign by which they should discover the truth of this revelation, that if they went immediately to Bethlehem they should find the Babe wrapped in swaddling-clothes, lying in a manger. This angel, probably Gabriel, who had already appeared to Zacharias and Mary, was in a moment joined by a multitude of the heavenly host, whose enraptured bosoms could no longer repress the intensity of joy, and who were permitted to strike their golden harps and unite their angelic voices in those ever memorable strains, "GLORY TO GOD IN THE HIGHEST, AND ON EARTH PEACE, GOOD WILL TOWARDS MEN."
In the nearby fields, the shepherds were watching over their flocks at night when suddenly an angel appeared, surrounded by a brilliant light. They were, of course, astonished and scared, but right from the start, they realized it wasn’t just a trick of the senses, as they all clearly saw and felt the magnificent reality. The kind spirit told them to let go of their fears and began to share his incredible message. He assured them that in the city of David, the long-awaited Messiah had actually been born that very day; [7] and the sign to confirm this revelation would be that if they went straight to Bethlehem, they would find the Baby wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger. This angel, likely Gabriel, who had already appeared to Zacharias and Mary, was soon joined by a multitude of heavenly beings whose overflowing joy could no longer be contained, and they were allowed to play their golden harps and raise their angelic voices in the unforgettable song, "GLORY TO GOD IN THE HIGHEST, AND ON EARTH PEACE, GOOD WILL TOWARDS MEN."
The shepherds instantly hastened to Bethlehem. They beheld the heaven-born Babe. They explained to Joseph and the virgin what they had seen and heard; and then circulated the wonderful news in every direction. Astonishment filled the whole vicinity; but it is probable a great diversity of opinion prevailed respecting the degree of credit due to the testimony of these witnesses; and the impression would soon vanish from those whose prejudices, whose ignorance, or whose temporal interests, prevented their immediate acknowledgment of the mighty fact. And must we not deeply lament, that to this hour similar reasons operate to produce a similar infidelity or rejection of the well-substantiated claims of the Son of God upon the affections and obedience of mankind?
The shepherds quickly rushed to Bethlehem. They saw the newborn Baby. They told Joseph and the virgin what they had seen and heard, and then shared the amazing news everywhere. Everyone was filled with wonder, but it’s likely that there were many different opinions about how much to believe the witnesses. The impact of this news would soon fade for those whose biases, ignorance, or personal interests kept them from accepting the incredible truth right away. And must we not mourn that even today, similar reasons lead to a similar disbelief or rejection of the well-supported claims of the Son of God on the hearts and obedience of people?
In the mean time, as the evangelist states, "Mary kept all these things, and pondered them in her heart." With a modesty and a piety so truly characteristic of this eminent woman, she left it to others to publish to the world the extraordinary manifestations of divine favour which she had received, content to observe in silence the movements of Providence, and to allow the mysterious fact to be gradually developed. As she took no measures at first to screen herself from reproach, but left the defence of her integrity to him whose wisdom was working all these wonders; so she did not avail herself of the present opportunity to extend her fame. From the astonishment or the applauses of the multitude she willingly retired into the shades; and instead of indulging vanity, gave herself to solemn meditation. Connecting together the vision of Zacharias, the language of Elizabeth, the visitation of the celestial spirit to herself, the miraculous conception, the unexpected occasion of her removal at this crisis to Bethlehem, the recent account of the shepherds, the language of ancient prophecy respecting the lowly birthplace of the Saviour of mankind, and the peculiar accordance of its minute descriptions with her present circumstances; she perceived the amazing conclusion to be drawn, and humbly adored the God of her salvation.
In the meantime, as the evangelist says, "Mary kept all these things, and pondered them in her heart." With a modesty and a devotion that truly characterized this remarkable woman, she let others announce to the world the extraordinary signs of divine favor that she had received, content to quietly observe the workings of Providence and to let the mysterious situation unfold gradually. Just as she didn't initially take steps to protect herself from criticism, leaving her integrity's defense to the one whose wisdom was performing all these wonders, she also did not take advantage of this moment to increase her fame. From the amazement or applause of the crowd, she willingly withdrew into the background; instead of indulging in vanity, she devoted herself to deep reflection. Connecting the vision of Zacharias, the words of Elizabeth, the visit from the heavenly spirit to her, the miraculous conception, the unexpected reason for her journey to Bethlehem at this time, the recent accounts from the shepherds, the language of ancient prophecy regarding the humble birthplace of the Savior of mankind, and the striking alignment of its detailed descriptions with her current situation; she recognized the incredible conclusion that could be drawn and humbly worshiped the God of her salvation.
We must pronounce Mary, then, a thoughtful observer and a humble inquirer, free from the levity of her age, and superior in mental character to the poverty of her condition. She had, indeed, superior advantages, and was in a sense placed under divine discipline and instruction: but she possessed a docility of spirit which rendered these singular means so conducive to her rapid improvement in knowledge and piety. Happy for us if we make a proper use of whatever religious privileges we enjoy, so that the spiritual opportunities and blessings which enhance our responsibility, do not, by our negligence, aggravate our condemnation!
We must regard Mary as a thoughtful observer and a humble seeker, free from the frivolity of her time and greater in intellect than the limitations of her situation. She did have significant advantages and was, in a way, under divine guidance and teaching: yet she had a willingness to learn that made these unique opportunities highly beneficial for her quick growth in knowledge and faith. It would be fortunate for us if we make good use of the religious privileges we have, ensuring that the spiritual opportunities and blessings that increase our responsibility do not, through our neglect, lead to our own downfall!
It is probable that we forfeit much enjoyment, and lose much attainable wisdom, by suffering the events of providence to pass unnoticed. The habit of investigating their connections, and tracing their consequences, would no doubt both improve the faculty of observation, and spare us many perplexities. Diligence in this sacred study would be repaid by pleasure and profit. We should "know," if we "followed on to know the Lord." The deep shadows which overcast the scenes of life, and are so impervious to the human sight, would be easily penetrated by the eye of faith; a new and glorious scene would present itself; objects and arrangements, before unseen, would gradually become visible; what was previously obscure in form and shape, would appear in just proportions; and many of the sources of our present anxiety might become the means of our richest satisfaction. Let us imitate the noble examples upon record; remembering that no place or time is unsuitable to a devout temper, or impossible to be improved to pious purposes. Isaac meditated in the fields, and Mary in the stable; and a devout spirit will transform either into a temple of praise and prayer.
It's likely that we miss out on a lot of enjoyment and valuable insights by ignoring the events around us. Getting into the habit of exploring their connections and understanding their impacts would definitely enhance our observational skills and save us from many confusions. Putting effort into this important pursuit would bring us both pleasure and benefit. We would truly "know" if we "continued to seek to know the Lord." The dark moments that cast shadows over our lives, which seem so hard to understand, could be easily seen through with faith; a new and beautiful perspective would emerge; things that were once hidden would slowly become clear; what was previously confusing would come into focus; and many of the things that cause us anxiety could turn into sources of great satisfaction. Let's follow the great examples set before us, keeping in mind that there’s no time or place unfit for a thoughtful spirit or that can't be used for meaningful purposes. Isaac contemplated in the fields, and Mary found peace in the stable; a spiritual mindset can turn either one into a place for worship and reflection.
On the eighth day after his birth, this immaculate Child was circumcised, both because he was a Jew, and the predicted Messiah. All the descendants of Abraham were required to submit to this institution; and, therefore, the parents of JESUS, for so he was named on this occasion, according to the previous intimation of the angel, could not omit this service without forfeiting their privileges; and as he was afterward to become the great preacher of righteousness to his own nation, it was necessary that he should not be exposed to the punishment of excommunication as a stranger. Thus, according to the apostle's allusion, he was "made under the law," and evidently partook of flesh and blood.
On the eighth day after his birth, this spotless Child was circumcised, which was required because he was a Jew and the prophesied Messiah. All descendants of Abraham needed to undergo this practice; therefore, the parents of JESUS, as he was named on this occasion following the angel's earlier message, had to perform this rite to maintain their privileges. Since he was destined to be the great preacher of righteousness for his people, it was important that he not be subjected to the punishment of being excluded as an outsider. Thus, in reference to the apostle's mention, he was "made under the law" and clearly shared in flesh and blood.
At the expiration of forty days, the parents of Jesus went up to Jerusalem, to present their Infant before the Lord in the temple, conformably to the Mosaic law, to offer the sacrifices required upon such an occasion, and to pay the stipulated sum of five shekels for the eldest son. [8] Led by a divine impulse, a certain venerable saint, named Simeon, came into the temple at this moment; and taking the wondrous Child into his aged arms, exclaimed, "Lord, now lettest thou thy servant depart in peace, according to thy word; for mine eyes have seen thy salvation, which thou hast prepared before the face of all people; a light to lighten the Gentiles, and the glory of thy people Israel!" Some have, with useless curiosity, inquired into the birth, parentage, and station of this enraptured believer; and with that mistaken prejudice so common to the world, by which greatness of character is perpetually associated with eminence of rank, and nobility of birth, they have endeavoured to prove him to have been a priest, or the son of Hillel, who was chief of the sect of the Pharisees, and president of the sanhedrim forty years; and he has even been represented as the father of that Gamaliel who brought up the apostle Paul. Whereas the narrative of Luke introduces him as a person of no considerable notoriety, but as one who possessed an infinitely greater claim to distinction in the inspired page, a man of exemplary conduct and piety, who was waiting for him who was so long expected as 'the consolation of Israel.' He was not the favourite of princes, but the servant of God; and this was his best distinction, that "the Holy Ghost was upon him; and it was revealed unto him by the Holy Ghost, that he should not see death before he had seen the Lord's Christ." Growing infirmities might have awakened, in an ordinary mind, some suspicion of the reality of that assurance which he had received. Delay seemed to mock his patience, time dimmed his eyes, and suspense might well have sickened his heart--but at last the hour arrives, the ancient oracles are fulfilled--celestial revelations, after the lapse of four hundred years from the days of Malachi, relume a benighted world--Zacharias, Mary, Simeon, received the prophetic spirit; and death becomes disarmed of his terrors, amidst the bright gleamings of approaching day.
After forty days, Jesus' parents went to Jerusalem to present their baby to the Lord in the temple, following the Mosaic law. They offered the required sacrifices and paid the set amount of five shekels for their firstborn son. [8] At that moment, a respected man named Simeon, guided by a divine inspiration, entered the temple. Taking the extraordinary Child in his arms, he said, "Lord, now you let your servant go in peace, as you promised; for my eyes have seen your salvation, which you have prepared for all people—a light for the Gentiles and the glory of your people Israel!" Some have, out of pointless curiosity, tried to uncover the birth, lineage, and status of this joyful believer. They have mistakenly assumed that greatness of character must be linked to high rank or noble birth, arguing that he was either a priest or the son of Hillel, who led the Pharisees and was president of the Sanhedrin for forty years. Some even portray him as the father of Gamaliel, who mentored the apostle Paul. However, Luke’s account introduces him as a man of no significant fame, yet one who held a much greater claim to honor in the inspired text—a man of exemplary conduct and devotion, waiting for the long-expected 'consolation of Israel.' He was not a favorite of kings; he was a servant of God, and his finest distinction was that "the Holy Spirit was upon him." The Holy Spirit revealed to him that he would not die before seeing the Lord's Christ. His growing weaknesses might have led an ordinary person to doubt that promise. The delay could have tested his patience, time might have clouded his vision, and uncertainty could have broken his heart. But at last, the hour came; the ancient prophecies came true—celestial revelations, after four hundred years since Malachi's days, brightened a dark world—Zacharias, Mary, and Simeon received the prophetic spirit, and death lost its fears amidst the shining light of a new dawn.
Turning to the astonished parents, and addressing himself particularly to his virgin mother, he said, "Behold, this child is set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel; and for a sign, which shall be spoken against, (yea, and a sword shall pierce through thy own soul also,) that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed." Anna, an aged prophetess, at the same instant joined this happy group, and "gave thanks, likewise, unto the Lord:" the glad tidings were circulated, and the parents returned into Galilee.
Turning to the amazed parents, and speaking especially to his mother, he said, "Look, this child is destined to cause the downfall and resurrection of many in Israel; and he will be a sign that many will oppose (and a sword will pierce your own soul as well), so that the thoughts of many hearts will be revealed." At that moment, Anna, an elderly prophetess, joined this joyful group and "thanked the Lord," spreading the good news as the parents returned to Galilee.
The accomplishment of that event, which in former ages was only the subject of prediction, constitutes part of the happiness of gospel times. True, indeed, as those predictions proceeded from God, there existed from the beginning a certainty of their being fulfilled. It was as impossible that God should lie, as that he should cease to exist; and having declared the decree, that his Son should "sit upon his holy hill of Zion," no human violence, no providential vicissitudes, no Satanic devices, could prevent it. No one of them, nor all of them combined, could effectually obstruct the march of omnipotent goodness to the completion of its purposes. But the saints of old suffered a material disadvantage from "his day" being as yet "afar off;" a disadvantage which could not possibly be remedied. It is evident that, except in cases of immediate inspiration, a suspicion might exist in the pious mind, that the prophecy might be partially, if not entirely misunderstood, as the most penetrating mind cannot, at this day, with the longest line of research, fathom the deeps of futurity. Time alone can, with perfect certainty, interpret the visions of prophecy.
The achievement of that event, which in the past was only a matter of prediction, is part of the joy of gospel times. It’s true that since those predictions came from God, there was always a certainty that they would be fulfilled. It was as impossible for God to lie as it was for Him to stop existing; and having declared that His Son would "sit upon his holy hill of Zion," nothing human, no changes in fate, and no evil plans could stop it. None of these, individually or together, could effectively hinder the unstoppable goodness of God from accomplishing its goals. However, the saints of old faced a real disadvantage because "his day" was still "afar off," a disadvantage that couldn't be fixed. It’s clear that, except in cases of immediate inspiration, there might be suspicion in the faithful mind that the prophecy could be partially, if not completely, misunderstood, since even the sharpest minds today, with extensive research, cannot fully understand the depths of the future. Only time can, with complete certainty, interpret the visions of prophecy.
It is also plain that no description, however minute and glowing, could perfectly represent the life and love of the Redeemer, as displayed in his own person. The imperfection of language rendered it impossible to portray the glorious reality. What inspired or seraphic pen, though dipped in heaven, could display all that was seen when they "beheld his glory?" Had Omnipotence remanded back the flood of ages, and recalled from the invisible state the illustrious saints that had been carried down the stream, from the time of Adam, in order to have witnessed the incarnation, the life, the death, and the resurrection of Jesus; with one voice they would have exclaimed, "The half was not told me."
It’s clear that no description, no matter how detailed and enthusiastic, could fully capture the life and love of the Redeemer as shown in his own presence. The limitations of language make it impossible to illustrate the amazing reality. What inspired or divine writer, even if their pen was heavenly, could convey all that was seen when they "beheld his glory?" If Omnipotence could rewind time and bring back the remarkable saints who had been lost to history since Adam to witness the incarnation, the life, the death, and the resurrection of Jesus, they would all say in unison, "I didn’t get the whole story."
In proportion to the approach of the Messiah, hope glowed with increasing ardour. Standing on the mount of prophecy, the pious Jews eagerly waited, and triumphantly hailed the rising of this bright day of grace. How many "prophets and righteous men" desired to behold this eventful period, but "died without the sight!" With what sacred pleasure did Moses record the first promise, though at the distance of many centuries! What rapture thrilled through the patriarch's veins, when he spake of the coming of Shiloh, "unto whom the gathering of the people should be;" and how did his languid eyes brighten with new lustre in the dying hour, when he exclaimed, "I have waited for thy salvation, O Lord!" In what strains of holy joy did the "sweet singer of Israel" declare, "My heart is inditing a good matter; I speak of the things which I have made touching the King; my tongue is the pen of a ready writer. Thou art fairer than the children of men; grace is poured into thy lips; therefore God hath blessed thee for ever!" How did Isaiah's heart glow with transport, while his lips were touched with inspiration, and triumph played on his prophetic harp, "Unto us a Child is born, unto us a Son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, the mighty God, the everlasting Father, the Prince of Peace. Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end, upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even forever. The zeal of the Lord of hosts will perform this!" But neither the sacred pleasure of Moses, when he recorded the first promise, nor the rapture that thrilled through the patriarch's veins, nor the holy joy of the sweet singer of Israel, nor the glow of transport that animated the heart of Isaiah, and inspired his lays, can equal the joy of the Christian church. Hope, indeed, presented to the early ages a lively picture of future times, and prophecy described them; but "blessed are our eyes, for they see; and our ears, for they hear ... many prophets and righteous men have desired to see those things which we see, and have not seen them; and to hear those things which we hear, and have not heard them."
As the arrival of the Messiah approached, hope burned with greater intensity. Standing on the mountain of prophecy, devout Jews eagerly waited and joyfully welcomed the dawn of this glorious day of grace. Many "prophets and righteous individuals" longed to witness this significant moment, but "died without seeing it!" What sacred joy filled Moses as he recorded the first promise, even though it was many centuries away! What excitement surged through the patriarch's veins when he spoke of the coming of Shiloh, "to whom the gathering of the people shall be;" and how his weary eyes shone with renewed light in his last moments when he said, "I have waited for your salvation, O Lord!" In what beautiful expressions of joy did the "sweet singer of Israel" proclaim, "My heart is stirring with a good message; I speak of the things I have created about the King; my tongue is like the pen of a ready writer. You are more beautiful than the children of men; grace is poured into your lips; therefore God has blessed you forever!" How did Isaiah's heart soar with excitement while his lips were touched with inspiration, as triumph resonated on his prophetic harp, "For unto us a Child is born, unto us a Son is given: and the government will be on his shoulders: and his name will be called Wonderful, Counselor, the mighty God, the everlasting Father, the Prince of Peace. There will be no end to the increase of his government and peace, on the throne of David and over his kingdom, to establish it with judgment and justice from now on and forever. The zeal of the Lord of hosts will accomplish this!" Yet, neither the sacred joy of Moses when he recorded the first promise, nor the exhilaration that flowed through the patriarch's veins, nor the holy delight of the sweet singer of Israel, nor the excitement in Isaiah's heart can compare to the joy of the Christian church. Hope indeed painted a vivid picture of the future for the early ages, and prophecy described it; but "blessed are our eyes, for they see; and our ears, for they hear... many prophets and righteous individuals have longed to see what we see and have not seen it; and to hear what we hear and have not heard it."
The visit of the shepherds to Mary, already recited, was succeeded by another, perhaps equally remarkable. A company of Magi, or Magians, [9] probably from Arabia, having seen a remarkable light, resembling a star, suspended over Bethlehem, hastened to pay suitable homage to the illustrious personage whose birth it indicated. These philosophers, who were particularly addicted to the study of astronomy, being doubtless incited by a divine influence to repair to the country over which this new star or meteor seemed to shed its glory, immediately went to Jerusalem, where they began to make the most anxious inquiries. The news of their arrival soon reached the ears of Herod, a man whose cruelties had often exasperated his subjects, and kept him in a state of constant suspicion; so that he naturally apprehended fatal consequences to his crown, from this report of the birth of a king. Having first consulted the priests and scribes respecting the birthplace of Christ, he procured a private interview with the Magians, for the purpose of ascertaining the time of the meteoric appearance; and, with all the policy of all experienced statesman, requested them to go and find out the extraordinary Child, then return to bring him word, that he might come and worship him. This was a contrivance, by which he expected to accomplish, with greater certainty, the destruction of Jesus.
The visit of the shepherds to Mary, which has already been mentioned, was followed by another, perhaps equally significant. A group of Magi, or Magians, [9] probably from Arabia, who had seen a bright light that looked like a star shining over Bethlehem, rushed to pay their respects to the important figure whose birth it signified. These scholars, who were especially devoted to studying astronomy, were likely prompted by divine inspiration to travel to the area illuminated by the new star or meteor. They went straight to Jerusalem, where they began asking numerous questions. Word of their arrival quickly reached Herod, a man whose brutal actions had often angered his subjects and kept him in a state of constant suspicion; so he naturally feared the news of a new king's birth could threaten his throne. After consulting the priests and scribes about where Christ would be born, he arranged a private meeting with the Magi to find out when the star had appeared. With the cunning of a seasoned politician, he asked them to go discover the extraordinary Child and then return to inform him so he could also go and worship him. This was a plan he believed would more surely lead to the elimination of Jesus.
The Arabian philosophers instantly proceeded on their journey--the star moved before them, as the cloudy pillar once guided the marches of Israel in the wilderness; till at length it became stationary over the place where the Infant lay: then, having fulfilled the design of its creation, totally and forever disappeared.
The Arabian philosophers quickly set out on their journey—the star led them, just like the cloudy pillar guided the Israelites in the wilderness; eventually, it stopped over the place where the baby lay: then, having completed its purpose, it vanished completely and forever.
Is it for us to question the wisdom of God in any of the productions of nature, because we do not perceive their utility? Shall we venture to arraign his goodness, because he has not only supplied the necessities of man, but filled the caves of ocean, and spread the pathless wilderness with a rich variety of existence, the specific purposes of which the researches of man have hitherto failed to discover? Shall we dare to say that the impenetrable forest, or the untenanted island, was made in vain? or that the grass grows, in the valley, the shrub sprouts on the inaccessible height, or the flower expands its beauties and diffuses its fragrance over the desert uselessly, because we have not discovered the reasons of their formation? Who, excepting the philosophers of Arabia, that had seen the new luminary shine for a few days and expire, but would have disputed the necessity or questioned the design of such a phenomenon? The ignorant, vulgar, and even the rest of the sages of Arabia, might have surveyed it with idle wonder or incurious eye; very few followed the splendour, or knew the intention of its appearance. And may not other beings be acquainted with many of those mysteries of nature which we fail to penetrate? or may not secret connexions and combinations, both in the animate and inanimate creation, exist, which, however important, it is not necessary for us to know? In reference both to nature and providence--
Is it our place to question God's wisdom in any of nature's creations just because we don't see their usefulness? Should we criticize His goodness simply because He has not only provided for human needs but also filled the ocean's depths and populated the vast wilderness with a rich variety of life, the specific purposes of which our research has yet to uncover? Should we dare to say that the impenetrable forest or the uninhabited island was created for no reason? Or that the grass grows in the valley, the shrub sprouts on the steep heights, or the flower blooms and spreads its fragrance in the desert for no purpose just because we haven't figured out why they exist? Who, except for the philosophers of Arabia, who witnessed a new star shine for a few days and then fade, would have doubted the necessity or questioned the purpose of such a phenomenon? The uneducated and ordinary people, even the other scholars of Arabia, might have looked at it with idle wonder or indifference; very few truly followed its brilliance or understood why it appeared. And isn't it possible that other beings are aware of many of those mysteries of nature that we can't grasp? Could there be hidden connections and combinations in both living and non-living creations that, while important, we don't need to understand? In relation to both nature and providence—
"One part, one little part, we dimly scan,
Through the dark medium of life's feverish dream;
Yet dare arraign the whole stupendous plan,
If but that little part incongruous seem."
"We only see a small part, a tiny part, vaguely,
Through the murky haze of life's restless dream;
Yet we dare to judge the entire grand design,
If that small part seems out of place."
BEATTIE.
Beattie.
The figure of Balaam, in predicting the birth of a Saviour, probably contained a prophetic allusion to the phenomenon in question; "There shall come a star out of Jacob, and a sceptre shall rise out of Israel;" and with similar reference, we read in the apocalyptic vision, "I am the bright and morning star."
The character of Balaam, when predicting the arrival of a Savior, likely included a prophetic hint about the event being discussed: "A star will rise out of Jacob, and a scepter will rise out of Israel;" and similarly, in the apocalyptic vision, it’s written, "I am the bright and morning star."
As soon as the Magians saw the young Child, with Mary his mother, they "fell down and worshipped him: and when they had opened their treasures, they presented unto him gifts; gold, and frankincense, and myrrh. And being warned of God in a dream that they should not return to Herod, they departed into their own country another way."
As soon as the Magi saw the young Child with His mother Mary, they fell down and worshiped Him. Then they opened their treasures and presented Him with gifts: gold, frankincense, and myrrh. After being warned by God in a dream not to return to Herod, they went back to their country by another route.
This narrative suggests many instructive considerations, some of which we shall briefly notice.
This story offers several important points to consider, a few of which we will mention briefly.
1. Many of those who have possessed the fewest means of moral and spiritual improvement, will appear in judgment against multitudes who enjoy the greatest variety of religious advantages. These Arabian sages acted up to what they knew, and followed the light which was afforded them; in consequence of which they made discoveries of the most valuable description, such as could have been attained by no other proceeding, and such as were totally concealed from the unobservant mass of mankind. It was indeed a small "star" that first attracted their notice, but it led to the "Sun of Righteousness." O that we were equally wise and diligent in the use of our opportunities and privileges--we should then be equally successful!
1. Many people who have had limited resources for moral and spiritual growth will stand in judgment over many who have enjoyed a wide range of religious opportunities. These Arabian sages acted on what they understood and followed the guidance they received; as a result, they made some of the most valuable discoveries that could not have been achieved in any other way, and that were completely hidden from the inattentive masses. It was indeed a small "star" that first caught their attention, but it led them to the "Sun of Righteousness." Oh, if only we were as wise and diligent in making the most of our opportunities and privileges—we would then be equally successful!
2. A specimen is here presented to us of the discriminating proceedings of the grace of God. Those who were "far off" were "brought nigh," while those who were "nigh" really, were placed "far off." These Pagans were conducted to Jesus; while the infatuated Jews, unaffected by his appearance and subsequent miracles, opposed his influence, and gloried in their shame. Thus was fulfilled the ancient oracle, "I am found of them that sought me not." The star which failed to excite attention in Judea, darted an attractive and effectual splendour into Arabia.
2. Here we have an example of the discerning actions of God's grace. Those who were "far off" were "brought near," while those who were "near" in reality were pushed "far off." These pagans were led to Jesus, while the blinded Jews, unimpressed by his presence and later miracles, resisted his influence and reveled in their own shame. This fulfilled the ancient prophecy, "I am found by those who did not seek me." The star that failed to catch attention in Judea shone attractively and effectively in Arabia.
3. It is truly deplorable, that those signs and wonders of Almighty mercy, which will fill eternity with praise, should be so little observed or appreciated by the great proportion of mankind. How different were the engagements that occupied the inhabitants of Jerusalem, from those of the Arabian philosophers! The star of Bethlehem excited the respectful attention only of a few strangers, who saw and followed it, and "found the Messiah." The Saviour they sought was despised and rejected of men, when emerging from the obscurity of his early life, he dwelt amongst them, distributing blessings, and imparting salvation.
3. It's really unfortunate that the amazing signs of God's mercy, which will fill eternity with praise, are so often overlooked or undervalued by most people. The distractions that engaged the people of Jerusalem were so different from those of the Arabian philosophers! The star of Bethlehem only caught the respectful attention of a few strangers who saw it, followed it, and “found the Messiah.” The Savior they were looking for was despised and rejected by people when he stepped out of his early life in obscurity to live among them, sharing blessings and offering salvation.
Is not this the case to the present hour? Where are the travellers to Zion? Where are the followers of Christ? Where are those happy individuals to be found, who, renouncing the speculations of philosophy, and the suggestions of a depraved and perverted mind, are led by the star of divine revelation to Jesus? Where are those who forsake ALL for him? Where the company of inquirers, whom no frowns and no flatteries can induce to relinquish the pursuit? Alas, how thinly scattered! The multitude, attracted by the glare of worldly glory, can see, indeed, the glitter of gold, and hear with approving readiness the accents of pleasure; but are unable to discern the excellencies of Christ, and will not listen to his voice! They are enchanted by other charms, and lulled into dangerous repose by other music!
Isn't this still true today? Where are the travelers to Zion? Where are the followers of Christ? Where can we find those joyful individuals who, giving up the theories of philosophy and the twisted thoughts of a corrupted mind, are guided by the light of divine revelation to Jesus? Where are those who give up EVERYTHING for him? Where is the group of seekers, whom neither harsh criticism nor flattery can persuade to give up their quest? Sadly, they are so few! The crowd, drawn in by the shine of worldly success, can certainly see the glimmer of gold and eagerly listen to the sounds of pleasure; but they can't recognize the greatness of Christ and refuse to hear his voice! They are enchanted by other attractions and lulled into a dangerous relaxation by different music!
4. Though the star of Bethlehem, which guided the Arabian sages to the Son of God, be extinguished, the clear light of truth still shines as in a dark place, and points us to the same object. "Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path." Whoever follows this light, will be led to Jesus; whoever neglects it must wander in the wilderness of error and perplexity. It sheds the clearest radiance on the path of the traveller, who is pressing to the "Prince of Peace." Let us not pay attention to those deceptive lights which the world holds out to allure and destroy. This only is from heaven, and will guide the inquirer thither, where the illumination it has diffused over the path of life, will be lost amidst the splendours of eternal day.
4. Although the star of Bethlehem, which led the wise men from the East to the Son of God, has faded, the bright light of truth still shines in the darkness and points us to the same destination. "Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light for my path." Anyone who follows this light will be brought to Jesus; anyone who ignores it will wander in a desert of confusion and error. It provides the clearest guidance for those traveling to the "Prince of Peace." Let's not be tricked by the false lights the world offers to entice and lead us astray. This light is the only one from heaven and will guide seekers to where the illumination it spreads over life's journey will be overshadowed by the glories of eternal day.
Section III.
The Flight into Egypt--Herod's cruel Proceedings--and Death--Mary goes to Jerusalem with Joseph--on their Return their Child is missing--they find him among the Doctors--he returns with them--the Feast of Cana--Christ's treatment of his Mother when she desired to speak to him--her Behaviour at the Crucifixion--she is committed to the care of John--valuable Lessons to be derived from this touching Scene.
The Flight into Egypt—Herod's cruel actions—and death—Mary travels to Jerusalem with Joseph—on their way back, their child is missing—they find him among the scholars—he returns with them—the Feast at Cana—Jesus' response to his mother when she wanted to talk to him—her behavior at the Crucifixion—she is entrusted to John's care—valuable lessons to be learned from this touching scene.
Christians, in their times of trial, are usually favoured with adequate supplies from heaven; so that if they have been overtaken suddenly, or attacked fiercely, their afflictions have neither found them unprepared, nor left them overwhelmed. It seems to have been the design of God, in some of his most painful dispensations, not only to purify the individual character, but to evince in general, by means of the sufferer's patience, humility, and other virtues, the reality of religion, and the power of faith; and thus to furnish an example for the imitation of mankind. This consideration may serve to explain a part of that mysteriousness which has characterized many instances of remarkable tribulation, and to prevent those hasty decisions upon the conduct of Providence which we are too apt to adopt. On all occasions, we may safely conclude, that whatever be the nature of our affliction, the goodness of our Father in heaven will both proportion it to the necessity of the case, and enable us to sustain it, by preparatory consolations.
Christians, during tough times, are often blessed with enough support from heaven; so if they're caught off guard or attacked fiercely, their struggles don’t find them unprepared or leave them overwhelmed. It seems that God’s intention, in some of His toughest trials, is not only to purify individual character but also to demonstrate through the sufferer’s patience, humility, and other virtues the reality of faith and the power of religion. This serves to provide an example for others to follow. This idea can help explain some of the mysteriousness that surrounds many instances of intense suffering and can stop us from making snap judgments about how Providence acts, which we tend to do. In any situation, we can be confident that, no matter the nature of our suffering, the goodness of our Father in heaven will match it to our needs and help us endure it with supportive comfort.
The story of Mary and her family illustrates this representation. The balance of her lot, so to speak, was poised by a divine hand; and the equilibrium was mercifully and almost constantly preserved, by a proportionate share of joy and sorrow. The danger of reproach and proscription by the Jewish law, was compensated by the circumstances of the miraculous conception; the meanness and misery of her condition in the stable at Bethlehem, were counterbalanced by the visit of the shepherds, and the equally wonderful journey of the eastern Magi; and the whole train of previous manifestations, tended to prepare her for the new distresses which were destined to attend the flight into Egypt.
The story of Mary and her family shows this clearly. The balance of her situation was held by a divine hand, and this balance was mercifully and almost always maintained by a mix of joy and sorrow. The threat of being shamed and excluded by Jewish law was offset by the circumstances of her miraculous conception; the poverty and hardship of her condition in the stable at Bethlehem were balanced by the visit from the shepherds and the equally amazing journey of the eastern Magi. All these previous events helped prepare her for the new struggles that would come with their flight into Egypt.
Herod was arranging his plans with malicious skill, and as he imagined, with secrecy; but there was an eye that watched his movements with unsleeping vigilance, and a wisdom invisibly operating to counteract his purposes. The Magi were forewarned, by a heavenly vision, not to return to this foe of the holy Jesus; and an angel appeared to Joseph, directing him to escape with the mother and child into Egypt; and thus did Herod himself unconsciously fulfil the ancient oracle; "Out of Egypt have I called my Son." The cruel archer shot at the Saviour's life, but the arrow rebounded and took his own.
Herod was carefully plotting his schemes with wicked skill, and he thought he was being secretive; but there was someone watching his every move with constant vigilance, and a hidden wisdom working to thwart his plans. The Magi were warned through a heavenly vision not to go back to this enemy of the holy Jesus; and an angel appeared to Joseph, instructing him to flee with the mother and child to Egypt. In doing so, Herod unwittingly fulfilled the ancient prophecy: "Out of Egypt have I called my Son." The cruel archer aimed at the Savior's life, but his arrow bounced back and struck him instead.
Behold, then, Mary and Joseph, with their infant charge, hastening, in obedience to the divine command, to a distance from the persecutor's fury! See them under the covert of darkness, and amidst the silence of night, flying to their appointed place of exile; still under the guidance of that hand which regulated all the events of their lives, with no less wisdom and constancy than it directed the movements and fixed the positions of the planetary and starry orbs, which glittered upon their adventurous path. Observe them trembling with human fears, but sustained by spiritual consolations! Mary presses the infant fugitive to her maternal breast, still "keeping all these things, and pondering them in her heart;" incapable of fully penetrating the cloud that obscures their present destiny, but looking through the tears of anguish to her divine Protector and Guide, believing that the light of Israel cannot be extinguished. In some respects, they "knew not whither they went;" but each was, no doubt, inspired by the devout sentiment of the poet:
Behold, Mary and Joseph, with their infant in tow, hurrying away, following the divine command, to escape the wrath of their persecutor! See them under the cover of darkness and in the stillness of night, fleeing to their designated place of exile; still guided by that hand which controlled all the events of their lives, with as much wisdom and steadiness as it directed the movements and positions of the planets and stars that shone along their challenging path. Notice them trembling with human fears but buoyed by spiritual comforts! Mary holds the fleeing infant close to her heart, still "keeping all these things, and pondering them in her heart;" unable to fully understand the veil that clouds their present fate, but looking through tears of despair to her divine Protector and Guide, believing that the light of Israel cannot be snuffed out. In some ways, they "knew not whither they went;" but each was, without a doubt, inspired by the devout sentiment of the poet:
"I hold by nothing here below,
Appoint my journey and I go;
Though pierced by scorn, oppress'd by pride,
I feel thee good--feel nought beside.
"I’m committed to nothing on this earth,
Set my path and I’ll move forth;
Even when hurt by disdain, weighed down by arrogance,
I sense your goodness—I feel nothing else."
No frowns of men can hurtful prove
To souls on fire with heav'nly love;
Though men and devils both condemn,
No gloomy days arise for them.
Guys' frowns can't cause any harm
To souls ignited by heavenly love;
Even if both men and demons judge,
They won’t experience any dark days.
While place we seek, or place we shun,
The soul finds happiness in none;
But with a God to guide our way,
'Tis equal joy to go or stay.
Whether we seek a place or avoid one,
The soul finds no happiness in either;
But with God to guide us,
It's equally joyful to leave or to stay.
Could I be cast where thou art not,
That were indeed a dreadful lot:
But regions none remote I call,
Secure of finding God in all." Mad. Guion.
Could I be placed where you are not,
That would truly be a terrible situation:
But I don’t consider any place far away,
Knowing I can find God everywhere." Mad. Guion.
Herod, whose cruelty and duplicity were equally conspicuous, finding that the young child had by some means eluded his grasp, meditated the deepest revenge, which, like a smothered flame, the longer it is confined, the more violently at last it blazes.
Herod, known for both his cruelty and deceit, realized that the young child had somehow slipped away from him. He plotted a deep revenge, which, like a smoldering fire, becomes more intense the longer it is held back.
For a time he concealed his feelings, with a view of the better securing ultimate success; but, on perceiving that his secret intentions were frustrated, he resolved on open war. Animated with a tyrant's spirit and a demon's rage he determined on the destruction of Jesus, though the accomplishment of his purpose should deluge Judea with blood. He issued his murderous decree, and despatched his executioners to Bethlehem and "all the coasts thereof," to slay "all the children from two years old and under, according to the time which he had diligently inquired of the wise men."
For a while, he kept his feelings hidden, aiming to secure his ultimate success. But after realizing that his secret plans were falling apart, he decided to go to war openly. Fueled by a tyrant's ambition and a demon's fury, he resolved to destroy Jesus, even if it meant drowning Judea in blood. He issued his deadly order and sent his executioners to Bethlehem and its surrounding areas to kill "all the children two years old and under, based on the time he had carefully questioned the wise men."
What language can express the barbarity of this conduct! The most savage of mankind have spared children, even when their parents have been guilty. The innocence and weakness of their age have preserved them from the sword, even of a victorious and exasperated enemy; and yet these little innocents, whose parents were not implicated in any plot to deceive the tyrant, whose yoke was endured with extraordinary patience, were given to the murderous sword, and Bethlehem suddenly converted into one vast slaughter-house. "Then," remarks the evangelist, "was fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremy the prophet, saying, In Rama was there a voice heard, lamentation, and weeping, and great mourning, Rachel weeping for her children, and would not be comforted, because they are not."
What words can capture the brutality of this act? Even the most vicious people have spared children, even when their parents were at fault. The innocence and fragility of their age have protected them from the sword, even from a victorious and furious enemy; yet these innocent little ones, whose parents were not involved in any plan to deceive the tyrant, whose burden was borne with remarkable patience, were delivered to the deadly sword, turning Bethlehem into a massive slaughterhouse. "Then," the evangelist notes, "was fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremy the prophet, saying, In Rama was there a voice heard, lamentation, and weeping, and great mourning, Rachel weeping for her children, and would not be comforted, because they are not."
"The innocents were martyrs indeed, but not in will, by reason of their tender age. Of these, however, it pleased the Prince of martyrs to have his train composed, when he made his entry into the world, as at this season; a train of infants, suited to an infant Saviour; a train of innocents, meet to follow the spotless Lamb, who came to convince the world of sin, and to redeem it in righteousness. They were the first-fruits offered to the Son of God after his incarnation, and their blood the first that flowed on his account. They appeared as so many champions in the field, clad in the King's coat of armour, to intercept the blows directed against him.
"The innocents were indeed martyrs, but not by choice, due to their young age. However, it was fitting for the Prince of martyrs to have his entourage made up of them when he entered the world during this time; a group of infants, appropriate for an infant Savior; a group of innocents, suitable to follow the spotless Lamb, who came to show the world its sin and redeem it in righteousness. They were the first gifts offered to the Son of God after his birth, and their blood was the first shed on his behalf. They appeared like champions in the arena, wearing the King's armor to shield him from the attacks aimed at him."
"The Christian Poet, PRUDENTIUS, in one of his hymns, has an elegant and beautiful address to these young sufferers for their Redeemer [10]; Hail, ye first flowers of the evangelical spring, cut off by the sword of persecution, ere yet you had unfolded your leaves to the morning, as the early rose droops before the withering blast. Driven, like a flock of lambs to the slaughter, you have the honour to compose the first sacrifice offered at the altar of Christ; before which methinks I see your innocent simplicity sporting with the palms and the crowns held out to you from above." [11]
"The Christian Poet, PRUDENTIUS, in one of his hymns, has a beautiful tribute to these young martyrs for their Redeemer [10]; Hail, you first flowers of the evangelical spring, cut off by the sword of persecution before you even had the chance to bloom in the morning, just like the early rose wilts before the harsh wind. Driven like a flock of lambs to slaughter, you have the honor of being the first sacrifice offered at the altar of Christ; before which I can almost see your innocent simplicity playing with the palms and crowns being offered to you from above." [11]
The parents of the infant Saviour remained in Egypt until the death of Herod [12], an event which was announced to Joseph in a dream, who was directed to return with Mary and her child into the land of Israel. When he heard that Archelaus, a prince no less sanguinary in his disposition than his infamous predecessor, reigned over Judah in the room of his father, he was afraid of returning; but being again divinely admonished, withdrew into Galilee, under the government of Herod Antipas. He took up his residence at Nazareth, a small city where he had formerly lived; by which the ancient oracle was fulfilled, "He shall be called a Nazarene."
The parents of the infant Savior stayed in Egypt until Herod's death [12], which was revealed to Joseph in a dream. He was instructed to return with Mary and her child to the land of Israel. When he learned that Archelaus, who was just as brutal as his infamous father, was now ruling over Judah, he became afraid to go back. However, after receiving another divine message, he moved to Galilee, which was under Herod Antipas' rule. He settled in Nazareth, a small town where he had previously lived, fulfilling the ancient prophecy that said, "He shall be called a Nazarene."
We may he allowed a momentary interruption of the narrative, by one observation on the death of Herod. How easily God can remove out of the way whatever opposes the designs of his wisdom! He lays his finger on the tyrant's head, and he sinks into the dust! Thus it has been, and thus it ever must be, with the adversaries of Christ. Every Herod must die. On the banners of the church is inscribed, "If God be for us, who can be against us?" Where are the Neros, and Domitians, and Caligulas, that have sought the life of Christianity?--They are dead! but his cause survives. "He must reign till he hath put all enemies under his feet." The Gospel, in pursuing its course through the world, resembles a mighty river, here and there meeting with powerful obstructions; but not prevented by these, it takes a circuitous course, and leaves them to be gradually overflowed or undermined, and buried in the stream. Thus superstition, idolatry, infidelity, Popery, Mahometanism, constitute so many obstructions to this celestial stream; but while it makes glad the city of God, it is gradually diffusing itself around, and sapping by degrees the foundation of these impediments, till being broken down and forgotten, an angel shall proclaim, "Babylon is fallen, is fallen!" Then shall "the kingdoms of this world become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever." Then all that "sought the young child's life," all that opposed the interests of Jesus, being dead and vanquished, "the whole earth shall be filled with the knowledge of the glory of the Lord, as the waters cover the sea."
We might take a brief pause in the story to make one observation about the death of Herod. How easily God can remove anything that stands in the way of His plans! He touches the tyrant's head, and he falls into the dust! This has always been the case, and it will always be so with Christ's enemies. Every Herod must die. On the banners of the church, it says, "If God is for us, who can be against us?" Where are the Neros, Domitians, and Caligulas who tried to destroy Christianity? They are dead! But His cause lives on. "He must reign until He has put all enemies under His feet." The Gospel, as it flows through the world, is like a mighty river, occasionally encountering strong obstacles; but it doesn’t let these stop it. Instead, it takes a winding path, leaving them to be gradually washed away or undermined and buried in its waters. Thus, superstition, idolatry, infidelity, Popery, and Islam are just some obstacles to this heavenly stream; but while it brings joy to the city of God, it is slowly spreading around and gradually eroding the foundations of these barriers until they are broken down and forgotten, and an angel will proclaim, "Babylon has fallen, has fallen!" Then "the kingdoms of this world will become the kingdoms of our Lord and of His Christ; and He will reign forever and ever." Then all those who "sought the young child's life," all who opposed Jesus, will be dead and defeated, and "the whole earth will be filled with the knowledge of the glory of the Lord, as the waters cover the sea."
The law of Moses commanded all the adult males of Israel to go up to Jerusalem three times in a year, to celebrate the feasts of the passover, pentecost, and tabernacles. Women were under no obligation to undertake these journeys; [13] but it was not unusual for such as were eminent for piety, to accompany their husbands and friends upon annual occasions. Mary, who set the highest value upon the ordinances of God, and who would not be disparaged by a comparison with the greatest characters of Israel, went up with Joseph year after year. In the exemption by which the law permitted females to remain at home, the weakness of their sex was regarded; but the strength of Mary's piety surmounted every obstacle, and, like her illustrious ancestor, she was "glad when they said, Let us go up to the house of the Lord." How dissimilar was her spirit to that of multitudes, whose reluctance renders religious duties so irksome and so formal; who call the Sabbath a weariness; and who, instead of hailing the hour of sacred solemnities, are eager to escape from spiritual restraints to replunge into the cares,--perhaps into the dissipations, of the world!
The law of Moses required all adult males of Israel to travel to Jerusalem three times a year to celebrate the feasts of Passover, Pentecost, and Tabernacles. Women were not obligated to make these trips; [13] but it was common for some who were known for their piety to join their husbands and friends on these annual occasions. Mary, who deeply valued God’s ordinances and wouldn’t be diminished by comparisons with the greatest figures in Israel, went up with Joseph year after year. The exemption allowing women to stay home acknowledged their physical limitations; however, Mary’s strong faith overcame every barrier, and, like her notable ancestor, she was "happy when they said, Let us go up to the house of the Lord." Her spirit was completely different from that of many who find religious duties burdensome and tiresome; who see the Sabbath as a chore; and who, instead of welcoming sacred moments, are eager to escape spiritual responsibilities and dive back into the worries—perhaps even the distractions—of the world!
The original constitution of the woman was that of a help meet for man; and it should be her pleasure to prompt to holy duties, and to associate with her beloved partner and children in them. Never does she appear so lovely, as when occupied in this pious service, avoiding all those needless cares which might preclude her own attendance upon appointed means.
The original role of a woman was to be a partner for man; it was meant to bring her joy to encourage him in sacred responsibilities and to join her beloved partner and children in those tasks. She is never more beautiful than when she is engaged in this meaningful work, steering clear of unnecessary worries that could keep her from participating in the designated activities.
The passover was intended as a commemoration of the deliverance wrought for the people of Israel when they were brought out of Egyptian slavery, and the destroying angel, who inflicted death upon the first born of their oppressors, passed over untouched the blood-besprinkled doors of the people of God: but, under the Christian dispensation, we are invited with our households to celebrate a more glorious release from a more tremendous bondage. The sacramental festival of the church of Christ records our emancipation from sin, both from its consequences and its dominion, through the atoning blood of the "Lamb slain from the foundation of the world," sprinkled upon the consciences of all believers. Mary, while keeping the typical feast, embraced the real Lamb, and devoutly enjoyed the festival of faith. So let us hasten to this institution, and participate this divine joy.
The Passover was meant to remember the deliverance of the people of Israel when they were freed from slavery in Egypt. The destroying angel, who caused death to the firstborn of their oppressors, passed over the doorways marked with the blood of God’s people. But now, under the Christian faith, we’re invited with our families to celebrate an even greater liberation from a far more serious bondage. The church’s sacramental festival commemorates our freedom from sin, including its consequences and its power, through the atoning blood of the "Lamb slain from the foundation of the world," poured out on the consciences of all believers. While observing this traditional feast, Mary embraced the true Lamb and joyfully participated in the celebration of faith. So, let us hurry to this institution and share in this divine joy.
It is probable that the parents of Jesus were in the habit of taking their son with them every year to Jerusalem, that they might, as it became religious characters, "train him up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord;" we are at least certain that he accompanied them at the age of twelve, when a memorable and instructive incident occurred.
It’s likely that Jesus’ parents had a routine of bringing him to Jerusalem every year, so they could, as devout individuals, "teach him in the ways and guidance of the Lord;" we know for sure he went with them at the age of twelve, when a significant and educational event took place.
At the expiration of the seven days of unleavened bread, they began their return homeward; but the child Jesus staid behind in Jerusalem, to make inquiries, and to listen to the instructions of those who publicly explained the sense of Scripture, and the traditions of the elders. His mother and Joseph were ignorant of this delay, till the end of the first day's journey; for as it was customary on these occasions to travel in very large companies, and these perhaps often separated into groups at considerable intervals, they took it for granted that he was with some of his friends or kindred, who were no doubt often charmed with his lovely company, and expected him to rejoin them in the evening. The day closed, the different parties assembled--but, to the inexpressible concern of Mary and Joseph, Jesus was not to be found! They searched and searched again, but in vain! The anxious father, but the still more anxious mother, flew to every friend, to every fellow traveller--no tidings were to be heard! Ah, Simeon, thy sword is beginning to pierce this maternal breast! What a night of sleepless anxiety passed, and with what haste did they retrace their steps to Jerusalem! What could they imagine, but that some evil beast had taken their Joseph! The weeping mother chides her negligence, stops every passing stranger, fancies perhaps that some emissary of persecution had seized him, and that Archelaus had accomplished what Herod had begun, searches every house where they had visited or lodged--O what must the mother feel--such a mother--and of such a child!
At the end of the seven days of unleavened bread, they started their journey home; but the child Jesus stayed behind in Jerusalem to ask questions and listen to those who explained the meaning of Scripture and the traditions of the elders. His mother and Joseph were unaware of this delay until the end of the first day's travel. Since it was common for people to travel in large groups that often split into smaller ones at significant distances, they assumed he was with some friends or relatives, who likely enjoyed his company, and expected him to join them in the evening. As the day came to an end and the different groups gathered, Mary and Joseph were filled with deep concern when they realized Jesus was missing! They searched and searched again, but found nothing! The worried father and even more worried mother rushed to every friend and fellow traveler—there was no news! Ah, Simeon, your words are starting to hurt this worried mother! What a night of sleepless anxiety they endured, and how quickly they retraced their steps to Jerusalem! What could they think, except that some wild animal had taken their Joseph? The crying mother blamed herself for not keeping closer track of him, stopped every person passing by, fearing that a persecutor had snatched him away, and that Archelaus had finished what Herod had started, searching every place they had visited or stayed—oh, what must the mother feel—such a mother—and of such a child!
But--he is found! On the third day, he was seen in one of the courts of the temple appropriated to the Jewish doctors, where they were accustomed to lecture to their disciples. It might be, perhaps, in the room of the great sanhedrim, where they assembled in a semi-circular form. In front of them were three rows of the scholars, containing each three-and-twenty. It is probable, that Christ sat in one of these rows; and, perhaps, the questions he put, and the answers he gave, excited so much notice amongst the doctors, that they called him into the midst of them, which was occasionally done. Thus the Jews state, that "if one of the disciples or scholars say, I have something to say in favour of him (one that is put on his trial) they bring him up and cause him to sit in the midst of them; and he does not go down from thence the whole day." [14]
But—he's been found! On the third day, he was spotted in one of the temple courts reserved for the Jewish teachers, where they usually lectured their students. It might have been in the great sanhedrin’s chamber, where they gathered in a semi-circle. In front of them were three rows of students, each with twenty-three members. It’s likely that Christ sat in one of those rows; and maybe the questions he asked and the answers he provided stood out so much to the teachers that they called him to join them, which sometimes happened. Thus, the Jews say that "if one of the disciples or scholars says, I have something to say in favor of him (someone on trial), they bring him up and cause him to sit in the midst of them; and he does not leave that spot all day." [14]
At the moment when his parents discovered the holy child Jesus, he was hearing and asking questions of the doctors, in which he displayed so much understanding, that they and their disciples were astonished. This is a lesson to youth, who should, gladly and submissively receive instruction, and may with respectful eagerness question their superiors. Let them avoid all offensive forwardness and conceit of their knowledge and attainments; remembering that he who could have taught the wisest of the Jewish doctors, sat at their feet listening and asking them questions!
At the moment his parents found the holy child Jesus, he was listening to and asking questions of the teachers, showing so much understanding that they and their followers were amazed. This serves as a lesson for young people, who should willingly and respectfully accept guidance and eagerly ask questions of their elders. They should steer clear of being overly assertive or arrogant about their knowledge and achievements; remembering that the one who could have taught the smartest Jewish teachers sat at their feet listening and asking them questions!
Feeling as a mother, but ignorant of the cause of this singular proceeding, Mary ventured, as soon as opportunity permitted, to remonstrate in these words, "Son, why hast thou thus dealt with us? Behold, thy father and I have sought thee sorrowing!" We are to consider this language as rather expressive of anxiety, that of anger; yet, perhaps, it may be admitted to contain a mixture of both. His mysterious and unauthorized disappearance might seem to her contrary to the obedience he owed, and was so uniformly accustomed to manifest to his parents. Why did he tarry? Why did he not, at least, inform them of his wishes to remain, and thus spare them the wretchedness which they had suffered during the past three days? Did he not know the tender love of his maternal parent? Did he not know the bitter tears she would shed, and the agonies she would suffer? Did he not feel the claim which she had upon his early years, and the reverence due to her character and piety?
Feeling like a mother but unsure of the reason for this unusual situation, Mary took the opportunity to express her concerns, saying, "Son, why have you treated us this way? Look, your father and I have been searching for you, filled with sorrow!" We should see this as more of an expression of anxiety than anger, though it might contain a bit of both. His mysterious and unexplained disappearance likely felt to her like a failure to obey—a behavior he was usually so accustomed to showing toward his parents. Why was he delaying? Why didn’t he at least inform them of his desire to stay and spare them the distress they experienced over the past three days? Didn't he understand the deep love of his mother? Didn't he realize the painful tears she would cry and the suffering she would endure? Didn't he feel the bond she had with him in his early years and the respect he owed her for her character and devotion?
Yes: these were considerations which he never overlooked; but he was absorbed in sublimer thoughts. Jesus was an extraordinary being, and the whole of this transaction ought to be viewed in connexion with the subsequent development of his designs, and the glory of his future actions. In it we have a glimpse of his superiority as the Son of God, and it was, doubtless, intended to attract the attention of his thoughtful mother, and to renew those meditations in which she had formerly exercised her mind, during the miracles of his nativity. His reply, "How is it that ye sought me? wist ye not that I must be about my Father's business," or, at my Father's? [15] would upon any other supposition, seem strange and unintelligible; and, accordingly, his parents did not comprehend him, being at present imperfectly versed in the mysteries of his kingdom. It was, however, perfectly in point, and full of meaning. Mary complained of having been so troubled to find him, and at the same time called Joseph his father. To which he replies, that she might surely have recollected that the temple was the most proper place to inquire for him, who, she knew, though a child, was already consecrated to so divine a work; that he was, in fact, where he ought to be, and about the proper business to which his life was to be devoted; and that, although Joseph were his reputed father, he possessed a higher relationship, and a nobler character than could distinguish mere mortals. God was his father--this was his house--and nothing must impede his purposes. Still, however, he instantly complied with the wishes of his parents, went with them to Nazareth, and during many succeeding years veiled the splendours of his character in the obedience and concealment of his childhood. Mary, in the mean time, "kept all these sayings in her heart."
Yes, these were things he never overlooked, but he was wrapped up in deeper thoughts. Jesus was an incredible being, and this whole situation should be understood in connection with the future development of his plans and the glory of his future actions. In this, we see a glimpse of his superiority as the Son of God, and it was likely meant to catch the attention of his thoughtful mother, renewing those reflections she had during the miracles surrounding his birth. His response, "Why were you searching for me? Didn’t you know I had to be in my Father’s house?" would seem strange and confusing under any other circumstances, and so his parents didn’t understand him, as they were still not fully aware of the mysteries of his kingdom. However, his reply was perfectly relevant and full of meaning. Mary expressed her frustration at having been so worried to find him, and at the same time called Joseph his father. To this, he responded that she should have remembered that the temple was the best place to look for him, since she knew, even though he was a child, he was already dedicated to such a divine purpose; that he was exactly where he was supposed to be, engaged in the work his life was meant for; and that, while Joseph was his earthly father, he had a higher relationship and a nobler identity than what mere mortals possess. God was his father—this was his house—and nothing should stand in the way of his mission. Still, he immediately complied with his parents' wishes, went with them to Nazareth, and for many years hid the greatness of his identity behind the obedience and humility of his childhood. Meanwhile, Mary "kept all these things in her heart."
In detailing the life of Christ, the inspired evangelists do not often introduce his mother; and whenever she is mentioned, it is rather to illustrate his character than hers; but we feel pleasure in collecting even the smallest fragments of this divine record, that nothing may be lost; and while searching for MARY, let us rejoice that we are, at the same time, conducted to JESUS.
In telling the story of Christ's life, the inspired writers don’t often mention his mother; and when she is brought up, it’s usually to highlight his character rather than hers; but we take joy in gathering even the tiniest pieces of this sacred account, so that nothing is overlooked; and while looking for MARY, let’s celebrate that we are, at the same time, led to JESUS.
The next circumstance that demands our notice, is the history of the wedding-feast at Cana in Galilee. Here the Saviour and his mother appear as the most conspicuous characters. These, with the disciples of Christ, at present few in number, were expressly invited; whence it has, with sufficient probability, been thought that it was the marriage of one of his own relations.
The next situation that we should pay attention to is the story of the wedding feast at Cana in Galilee. Here, the Savior and his mother are the most prominent figures. Along with them, Christ's disciples, who were still few in number at that time, were specifically invited; for this reason, it has been reasonably assumed that it was the wedding of one of his relatives.
It seems highly becoming the dignity of the Saviour to sanction, by his holy presence, the institution of marriage in general, and to sanctify its observance on the present occasion in particular. Its utility, in reference to individual comfort and to the interests of society at large, renders "marriage honourable in all;" and while it would be ungrateful to Providence, not to accept with suitable emotions of cheerfulness the blessing which has been so long and so eagerly sought, it must always be injurious to character to indulge in extravagant merriment or indecorous festivity. Let persons forming such a connection aim to chastise their mirth with a solid piety, recollecting that while they are allowed to be cheerful, they must not be intemperate.
It seems very fitting for the dignity of the Savior to bless, by His holy presence, the institution of marriage in general and to sanctify its observance on this particular occasion. Its significance for individual happiness and the well-being of society as a whole makes "marriage honorable in all." While it would be ungrateful to ignore the blessing that has been long and eagerly sought, it’s important to remember that excessive joy or inappropriate celebrations can harm one's character. Those entering this union should aim to balance their happiness with genuine devotion, remembering that while it's okay to be joyful, they should not go overboard.
At the feast of Cana, the wine failed. The poverty of the family might not admit of a very liberal supply, or a larger number of visiters might come than had been expected. Mary immediately informed her Son. She saw that this circumstance occasioned confusion, she knew the power of Jesus, and she wished to spare the feelings of the new-married pair, who might have been exposed to censure for the scantiness of the supply. If these were her real sentiments, they were worthy of her character and sex. Let this example of amiable concern for the reputation of another, and the general comfort of the guests at this nuptial feast, stimulate us to an imitation of her kindness. How common is it for persons to depreciate and ridicule each other, availing themselves of trifling mistakes or unimportant oversights, to awaken prejudices and to exasperate dislikes! Envy is so prevalent in the world, so natural to the human heart, and so inconceivably diversified in its methods of operation, that we cannot be too much warned against it, especially as its venom lies concealed, hut often works effectually.
At the wedding in Cana, the wine ran out. The family's financial situation might not have allowed for a generous supply, or there could have been more guests than expected. Mary quickly told her Son about it. She noticed that this situation caused some confusion, understood Jesus's power, and wanted to protect the feelings of the newlyweds, who might have faced criticism for not having enough wine. If these were her true feelings, they reflected her character and nature. Let this example of genuine concern for the reputation of others and the overall comfort of the guests at this wedding encourage us to show similar kindness. It's so common for people to belittle and mock one another, seizing on minor mistakes or insignificant oversights to stir up prejudice and fester dislike! Envy is widespread in the world, so inherent to human nature, and so incredibly varied in how it manifests, that we must remain vigilant against it, especially since its poison is often hidden but can be quite effective.
The female sex, of which we have before us so fine a specimen, are naturally attentive and kind, skilful to discern, quick to feel, and prompt to relieve the wants of others. They seem endowed with a generosity, in which it is their honour to excel, while it is their duty to cultivate and indulge it. Are comforts needed? Their ready hands will supply them. Is pain suffered? Their tender hearts will sympathize and aim to alleviate it. They are officious to replenish the cup of joy, and no less prompt to sweeten and mitigate the bitter draughts of sorrow. To them we look to increase our pleasures in the days of prosperity--for them we do not ask in vain to sustain our aching head, and to smooth the pillow of sickness and of death!
The female sex, of which we have such a great example here, is naturally attentive and kind, skilled at understanding, quick to feel, and eager to help others. They seem to possess a generosity that they take pride in, and it is their responsibility to nurture and express it. Do we need comfort? Their willing hands will provide it. Is someone in pain? Their compassionate hearts will empathize and strive to ease it. They are quick to refill the cup of joy and just as ready to lessen the harshness of sorrow. We look to them to enhance our happiness in good times—when we need support to ease our headaches or to make our sickbeds and moments of death more bearable, they are there for us!
But if the views we have imputed to Mary really dictated the intimation which she gave to Jesus, respecting the deficiency of wine, it may be asked, how came she to meet with so austere a reply, as "Woman, what have I to do with thee? Mine hour is not yet come." This requires some attention.
But if the opinions we’ve attributed to Mary truly influenced her message to Jesus about the lack of wine, one might wonder why she received such a harsh response, like "Woman, what does that have to do with me? My time hasn't come yet." This needs some consideration.
In the first place, notwithstanding the feeling of kindness which dictated this interference, Christ might have thought it necessary to assert his divine prerogative. It is evident, from her immediately directing the servants to do whatever he commanded them, she expected some miracle; for she was, no doubt, fully persuaded by this time of his being the Messiah. But, though endowed with maternal authority, it was not her province to point out the course of his proceeding as Lord of all. He was willing, however, to grant her wishes; but, by this language, imposed secrecy. He would choose the moment and the proper manner of imparting the necessary supply. One would almost infer from the injunction of Mary to the servants, that he had informed her of his intentions; and that while he felt no displeasure at her request, it was necessary to wait his divine will.
At first, even though the kindness behind this involvement was clear, Christ might have felt it was important to assert his divine authority. It’s obvious from her immediately telling the servants to do whatever he said that she expected some kind of miracle; she was probably already convinced that he was the Messiah. However, despite having a mother's authority, it wasn’t her role to dictate how he should act as the Lord of all. He was willing to fulfill her wishes, but with that response, he also asked for discretion. He would decide the right time and way to provide the necessary help. One could almost assume from Mary’s instruction to the servants that he had shared his plans with her; and while he wasn’t upset by her request, it was important to wait for his divine timing.
In the next place, the words were, probably, not so disrespectful as they at first appear. Some have thought the original phrase might be rendered, "What is that to thee and me?" meaning, "What concern have we in this want of wine? it is the duty of others to provide, and not ours." It must be admitted, however, that this interpretation is not so honourable to the benevolent character of Christ, nor so natural, under all the circumstances, since Mary was evidently and properly concerning herself, as a relative in this affair, and the use of similar expressions in other parts of Scripture imply some degree of reproof. [16] Considering the divine character of our Lord, this phraseology was not improper, because in what concerned his office she had no authority over him; and Mary, impressed with a sense of his extraordinary character, which was every day increasingly developing himself, withdrew in reverential silence to enjoin the necessary obedience upon the servants. She felt, and let us never forget, that the endearments of friendship and the tender ties of consanguinity must not interfere with the superior claims of religion and of Christ.
In the next place, the words were probably not as disrespectful as they seem at first. Some have suggested that the original phrase could be interpreted as, "What does that have to do with us?" meaning, "It's not our concern about this wine shortage; it's up to others to handle it." However, it must be acknowledged that this interpretation doesn’t really do justice to the compassionate nature of Christ, nor is it entirely fitting given the situation, since Mary was clearly and rightly concerned as a family member in this matter, and similar phrases used elsewhere in Scripture imply some level of rebuke. [16] Given the divine nature of our Lord, this choice of words was not inappropriate, because in matters related to his mission, she had no authority over him; and Mary, realizing his extraordinary nature, which was becoming more evident every day, stepped back in respectful silence to direct the necessary obedience from the servants. She understood, and let us not forget, that the bonds of friendship and family must not come before the higher responsibilities of faith and of Christ.
The greatest objection seems to attach to the use of the abrupt and disrespectful term "woman;" but the usages of antiquity prove that this mode of address was quite different in meaning from what it appears in English. The politest writers, and most accomplished princes, adopted it in addressing ladies of quality; and even servants sometimes spoke to their mistresses in this manner. [17] In the last and tender scene of the cross, it is not to be imagined that the dying Son should intentionally, or even inadvertently, wound the feelings of a weeping mother, and at the very moment too when affectionately commending her to the care of his surviving friend and disciple; and yet his address is precisely similar: "woman, behold thy Son!"
The biggest objection seems to be the use of the abrupt and disrespectful term "woman," but the practices of ancient times show that this way of addressing someone meant something different than it does in English today. The most polite writers and the most refined princes used it when speaking to ladies of high status; even servants would sometimes refer to their mistresses in this way. [17] In the final and emotional scene of the cross, it’s hard to believe that the dying Son would intentionally or even unintentionally hurt the feelings of his grieving mother, especially at the moment he is lovingly entrusting her to the care of his remaining friend and disciple; yet his address is exactly the same: "woman, behold thy Son!"
Jesus soon issued his orders to the servants to fill six water-pots of stone, which were at hand, and were commonly used for washing cups and other vessels, and the hands and feet of the guests, according to the Jewish custom of purifying. [18] The water, to the astonishment of all present, be turned into wine of so excellent a flavour as to excite particular notice. This was the beginning of his public miracles, a wonderful display of his glory, and a means of confirming the minds of his disciples.
Jesus quickly told the servants to fill six stone water jars that were nearby, which were typically used for washing cups and other items, as well as the hands and feet of guests, following the Jewish purification customs. [18] The water, to everyone’s amazement, was turned into wine of such exceptional flavor that it drew special attention. This was the start of his public miracles, a remarkable demonstration of his glory, and a way to strengthen the beliefs of his disciples.
"There is a marriage whereto we are invited; yea, wherein we are already interested; not as the guests only, but as the bride; in which there shall be no want of the wine of gladness. It is marvel if in these earthly banquets there be not some lack. 'In thy presence, O Saviour, there is fulness of joy, and at thy right hand there are pleasures for evermore.' Blessed are they that are called to the marriage-supper of the Lamb." [19]
"There is a wedding we're invited to; in fact, we’re already part of it, not just as guests, but as the bride; and there will be no shortage of joyful wine. It's a wonder if there isn’t some lack at these earthly feasts. 'In your presence, O Savior, there is fullness of joy, and at your right hand, there are pleasures forevermore.' Blessed are those who are called to the wedding feast of the Lamb." [19]
As the extraordinary character of Christ became from this moment increasingly apparent, it is easy to believe that the strong feelings of maternal tenderness in the bosom of Mary blended themselves more and more with a spiritual affection. She was indeed, in one sense, the mother of our Lord, but she was also his disciple--she had been guide of his childhood, but she sat at the feet of his maturity. As he ascended to an immeasurable elevation above every other being of the human race, she must feel that the authority of the earthly parent, although it were never disregarded or disavowed, but, on the contrary, must have impressed a peculiarity both upon his affection and hers, was, however, absorbed in the superiority of his heavenly commission. He obeyed her as a child, but she submitted to him as the Lord.
As Christ's extraordinary character became more and more evident from this point on, it's easy to believe that Mary's strong feelings of maternal love blended more and more with a spiritual connection. She was, in a way, the mother of our Lord, but she was also his disciple—she had guided him in his childhood, yet she sat at his feet as he matured. As he rose to a level far above any other human being, she must have realized that the authority of an earthly parent, though never ignored or rejected, and which must have shaped their bond, was ultimately overshadowed by the greatness of his divine mission. He obeyed her like a child, but she submitted to him as her Lord.
Does the observant eye of a mother watch with unutterable solicitude the progress of her beloved offspring, tracing the improvement of his mind, the development of his faculties, the career of his life, sympathizing with his sorrows and participating with his joys, taking a fond share in all that concerns him--his prospects, his pursuits, his whole character;--does the maternal heart, even in ordinary cases, feel so much and so long, cherishing such undiminished interest in every vicissitude that affects the son of her love? With what lively sensibility must Mary have contemplated the rising glory of the inimitable Jesus! What a track of majesty must have marked his footsteps! What a winning singularity must have distinguished his actions! What purity must have adorned his conduct! What "grace was poured into his lips!" Who can express the deep interest that his thoughtful mother must have felt in the discourses she heard, the wisdom with which he silenced gainsayers, penetrated human hearts, exposed secret motives and purposes, confounded the most wise and artful, and communicated the sublimest truths in the most commanding and lucid manner! How must she have felt to have been the witness of his astonishing miracles, to have seen the flashes of unearthly dignity breaking through the concealment of a human exterior, and to have traced the accomplishment of all that prophets had foretold and angels announced! O, what an honour to have been the mother, but still more so to be the disciple of him who was predicted by prophets, prefigured by types, attended by ministering angels, celebrated by the most eminent of the Jewish church, obeyed by all the elements of nature, the principalities of darkness, and the powers of heaven;--who, "being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God; but made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men!"
Doesn't a mother's watchful eye follow her beloved child with deep concern, noticing how his mind improves, how his abilities develop, and how his life progresses, sharing in his sadness and joy, and caring deeply about everything related to him—his future, his activities, his entire character? Even in everyday situations, does a mother’s heart not feel greatly and for a long time, holding on to a strong interest in every change that affects the son she loves? How must Mary have felt as she observed the growing greatness of the incomparable Jesus! What a path of greatness must have marked his life! What a unique charm must have set his actions apart! What purity must have been in his behavior! What "grace was poured into his lips!" Who can capture the profound interest that his thoughtful mother must have felt in the teachings she heard, how he silenced critics, understood human hearts, revealed hidden motives, outsmarted the wisest and most cunning, and conveyed the highest truths in the most powerful and clear way! How must she have felt witnessing his incredible miracles, seeing glimpses of divine greatness shining through his human form, and recognizing the fulfillment of everything the prophets foretold and the angels announced! Oh, what an honor it was to be his mother, but even more to be his disciple, the one who was foretold by prophets, symbolized by types, accompanied by ministering angels, celebrated by the most distinguished members of the Jewish church, obeyed by all the forces of nature, the powers of darkness, and the authorities of heaven;—who, "being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God; but made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men!"
The sacred history, which is chiefly occupied in the life of Christ himself, and the detail of his actions, does not explain how often his mother accompanied him. The incidental mention of her and his brethren upon one occasion shows, however, what we cannot but infer, that she was one of his frequent attendants. He was talking "to the people" in a private house, with the instructive familiarity for which he was so remarkable, when "his mother and his brethren stood without, desiring to speak with him." They had something of importance to communicate, otherwise it cannot be supposed they would have interrupted his conversation; but, being unable to reach him on account of the multitude, their wishes were conveyed from one to another, till the person who stood by him intimated that his mother and brethren were waiting to speak with him. Availing himself of the circumstance to impress his admonition upon the assembled crowd, he said to the person who informed, "Who is my mother? and who are my brethren?" Then addressing the people as he pointed to the disciples, he exclaimed, "Behold my mother, and my brethren! For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother and sister and mother."
The sacred history, mainly focused on the life of Christ and his actions, doesn’t really explain how often his mother was with him. However, a casual mention of her and his brothers in one instance suggests that she was one of his regular companions. He was speaking "to the people" in a private house, with the relatable familiarity he was known for, when "his mother and his brothers stood outside, wanting to talk to him." They had something important to say; otherwise, they wouldn’t have interrupted his conversation. But, unable to reach him because of the crowd, their message was passed along until someone next to him indicated that his mother and brothers were waiting to speak with him. Taking the opportunity to make a point to the gathered crowd, he asked the person who informed him, "Who is my mother? And who are my brothers?" Then pointing to the disciples, he said, "Look at my mother and my brothers! For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother."
Did he then intend to pour contempt upon these near relatives? Did he disclaim the ties of kindred? Did he exclude Mary, James, and Joses, Simeon and Judas, from the honour and the happiness of participating those spiritual blessings which he so liberally dispensed to others?--Surely not. Applying to this the same principle of interpretation which was adopted in explaining his words at the feast of Cana, we infer that he meant to intimate that they who called him brother according to the flesh, and even she who bore him, need not be envied by those whom he admitted to the intimacy and happiness of a spiritual relationship; and that whatever of love and kindness could be supposed to arise from the natural connexion, was enjoyed in a nobler sense by virtue of a spiritual union. Every thing that can consummate the happiness of man, every thing that can secure the most glorious and permanent distinction, arises from being the disciple of the blessed Jesus, and "doing the will of his Father." Let such an one envy no more the possessions of time, for he is heir to the inheritance of heaven; let him not value at too high a price any human honour, title, or relationship, for he is a member of the "household of God."
Did he then mean to look down on these close relatives? Did he reject family ties? Did he exclude Mary, James, Joses, Simeon, and Judas from the honor and joy of enjoying the spiritual blessings he shared so generously with others?—Surely not. If we apply the same interpretive principle we used when discussing his words at the wedding in Cana, we can infer that he was suggesting those who called him brother in a physical sense, and even his mother, shouldn't be envied by those he welcomed into a close and joyful spiritual relationship; and that whatever love and kindness could be associated with natural connections is experienced in a greater way through spiritual unity. Everything that can complete a person's happiness, everything that can offer the most glorious and lasting distinction, comes from being a follower of the blessed Jesus and "doing the will of his Father." Let such a person no longer envy the temporary possessions of this world, for they are heirs to the inheritance of heaven; let them not value human honor, titles, or relationships too highly, for they are members of the "household of God."
We now hasten to a scene calculated at once to excite our liveliest sensibilities and our warmest gratitude--a scene upon which the eyes of the remotest ages were fixed with holy anticipation, and which all future generations will contemplate with retrospective joy--a scene distinguished by the most affecting incidents--in one of which, not the least remarkable, the mother of our Lord appears conspicuous.
We now rush to a scene designed to stir our deepest emotions and our greatest gratitude—a scene that the most distant ages awaited with sacred anticipation, and which all future generations will look back on with joy—a scene marked by the most touching events—in one of which, notably, the mother of our Lord stands out prominently.
It is observable, that whenever he alluded to the circumstances of his own death, Christ adopted a mode of speaking which is expressive of the most dignified composure of mind, united with an irresistible firmness of purpose. He advanced to the cross of martyrdom like one who, "for the joy that was set before him, despised the shame." His love to man annihilated the terror of death, and rendered him solicitous to shed his blood. "I have a baptism to be baptized with, and how am I straitened till it be accomplished." In the hour of previous conflict he intimated that this was the tragical but necessary design of his coming into the world. From his radiant throne in glory, he saw, in awful perspective, the afflictions which were destined for his incarnate state; and, instead of a train of angels, he prepared to be attended by a retinue of sorrows, during his abode in the world. Above all, he beheld the CROSS, surrounded with awful clouds, raised amidst the scorn of human and the triumph of infernal enemies. He saw the full tide of misery set in against him; but, with unabating love to man, and perfect obedience of spirit to the Father--melting with pity and glowing with zeal--he prepared to encounter the billows and the storms of death. He was not overtaken by a calamity which he neither foresaw nor could prevent, for ten thousand angels at his word would have hastened to pluck him from the waves; but in fulfilment of the everlasting covenant, to glorify the Father and to redeem a perishing world, he was "led to the slaughter."
It's clear that whenever he mentioned the circumstances of his own death, Christ used a way of speaking that showed incredible calm and unwavering determination. He approached the cross with the mindset of someone who, "for the joy that was set before him, despised the shame." His love for humanity erased the fear of death and made him eager to shed his blood. "I have a baptism to undergo, and how distressed I am until it’s completed." In moments of struggle, he hinted that this was the tragic yet necessary purpose of his coming into the world. From his glorious throne, he foresaw, in a terrifying vision, the sufferings that awaited him in his human form; instead of being accompanied by a host of angels, he braced himself for a companion of sorrows during his time on earth. Above all, he saw the CROSS, shrouded in ominous clouds, raised amid the scorn of humanity and the triumph of demonic foes. He witnessed the overwhelming tide of suffering against him; yet, with unwavering love for humanity and perfect obedience to the Father—filled with compassion and fervor—he readied himself to face the waves and storms of death. He was not caught in a disaster that he didn’t foresee or couldn’t stop since ten thousand angels could have rushed to his aid at his command; but to fulfill the eternal covenant, to glorify the Father, and to save a doomed world, he was "led to the slaughter."
At this period all Judea was present to celebrate the paschal festival; the great council of the nation was convened; Herod, the governor of Judea, and Pilate, the tetrarch of Galilee, with their attending armies, displayed the grandeur of the empire; and on the mount of crucifixion a vast concourse of people assembled to witness this tragical scene. What must have been their sensations when nature became convulsed--when darkness veiled the sun--and the inhabitants of the invisible world burst through the trembling earth, and reappeared to many in Jerusalem! Never did an hour revolve since the beginning of time that laboured with such great events. The fate of the moral creation was now weighing in the scales--the happiness of millions was at stake--the interests of eternity were deciding--and the victory over sin, death, and hell, was proclaimed by the expiring Redeemer, when he said, "IT IS FINISHED."
At that time, all of Judea gathered to celebrate the Passover festival; the national council was called together; Herod, the governor of Judea, and Pilate, the tetrarch of Galilee, along with their armies, showcased the might of the empire; and on the hill of crucifixion, a large crowd gathered to witness this tragic event. Can you imagine their feelings when nature reacted—when darkness covered the sun—and the spirits from the unseen world emerged from the trembling ground, reappearing to many in Jerusalem? Never has there been an hour since the dawn of time that carried such significant events. The fate of humanity was in balance—the happiness of millions was at risk—the stakes of eternity were being determined—and the victory over sin, death, and hell was proclaimed by the dying Redeemer when he said, “IT IS FINISHED.”
Amidst this scene of wonders, behold a group of females, no less similar in character than in name; Mary the mother of Jesus, Mary the wife Cleopas, and Mary Magdalene. Many women are honourably conspicuous in the records of the New Testament, but never did they appear with greater advantage than at this moment. All the disciples were fled, with the single exception of John, who had overcome his temporary apprehensions, and was returned to the field of danger. These pious heroines, although incapable of affording the glorious Sufferer any assistance, and although surrounded by an infuriated enemy, rose superior to the fears of their sex, and pierced through the crowd, to testify their sympathy, to listen to his dying words, and to watch the expiring flame of life to the moment of its extinction.
Amidst this scene of wonders, here is a group of women, just as similar in character as they are in name; Mary the mother of Jesus, Mary the wife of Cleopas, and Mary Magdalene. Many women are prominently mentioned in the stories of the New Testament, but they have never stood out more than at this moment. All the disciples had fled, except for John, who overcame his temporary fears and returned to the scene of danger. These devoted women, although unable to provide any help to the glorious Sufferer and surrounded by a raging enemy, rose above the fears often faced by their gender, pushed through the crowd to show their support, listen to his final words, and watch the last flicker of life until it faded away.
What a scene was this for his MOTHER! How could she sustain the horrible spectacle? How could she survive this fiery trial? What inconceivable anguish must it have occasioned to witness the death of her Son! Say, ye mothers who have watched the infant days and progressive maturity of a firstborn, what distress ye have felt at his early loss! The flower perhaps had just expanded to the day, when the pestilential wind blew from the desert of death and withered its beauties! It is gone--but has left behind a sense of unspeakable desolation. How were your most delightful hopes annihilated in a moment, and ye were ready to adopt the language of David in his agony, "O my son Absalom! my son, my son Absalom! would God I had died for thee, O Absalom! my son, my son!"
What a scene this was for his MOM! How could she bear the horrible sight? How could she get through this fiery ordeal? What unimaginable pain must it have caused her to see her Son die! Tell me, you mothers who have watched your firstborn grow from infancy to maturity, what misery you’ve felt at the thought of losing him too soon! The flower may have just bloomed, when the deadly wind from the desert of death came and destroyed its beauty! It’s gone—but it has left behind a feeling of indescribable emptiness. How were your greatest hopes shattered in an instant, making you want to echo David's words in his anguish, "O my son Absalom! my son, my son Absalom! would God I had died for thee, O Absalom! my son, my son!"
But this was a death of the most ignominious and painful description. Mary beheld her Son suffering the shame of a public execution and the torment of a cross. She saw him suspended between heaven and earth, as if unworthy of either, crucified between two malefactors, and insulted by an outrageous mob. She heard the revengeful speeches of that infatuated multitude, and the mutual congratulations of those by whom they were instigated, and who ridiculously imagined they had obtained a decisive victory! The terror of this hour and power of darkness pervaded her own spirit, and she lived to feel a greater horror than it is in the power even of the king of terrors himself to inflict.
But this was a death that was incredibly shameful and painful. Mary watched her Son endure the humiliation of a public execution and the agony of a cross. She saw him hanging between heaven and earth, as if he didn’t deserve either, crucified between two criminals and mocked by a cruel crowd. She heard the vengeful shouts of that crazed mob and the mutual back-patting of those who stirred them up, who foolishly thought they had won a major victory! The fear of this moment and the weight of darkness filled her own spirit, and she lived to experience a greater horror than even the king of terrors could inflict.
This was the crucifixion of an innocent Son! He had experienced indeed the mockery of a judicial proceeding, but had been sacrificed to the ravings of a despicable and infatuated mob, the asseverations of perjured witnesses, the timidity of Pilate, and the hatred of every class of Jews. No guile was found in his mouth, no recrimination in his language, no impatience in his conduct. Conscious of perfect innocency, he yet submitted to condemnation and death as a notorious offender; and, with all things under his control, he did not lift a finger to stop the career of injustice, or arrest the course of infernal rage. If the mothers of his two associates in suffering were present on this occasion, whatever bitterness of anguish they had felt to see the mournful end of their own offspring, they could not but admit that public crime demanded public punishment, and sentiments of commiseration must have blended themselves with those of censure when they viewed their fate. But the mother of Jesus saw her beloved Son condemned without reason, and suffering in defiance of justice. In proportion as she knew his innocency she must have felt his loss.
This was the crucifixion of an innocent Son! He had indeed faced the mockery of a legal trial, but he was sacrificed to the frenzied outcry of a contemptible and deluded mob, the claims of false witnesses, the cowardice of Pilate, and the hatred from every group of Jews. There was no deceit in his words, no blame in his speech, no impatience in his behavior. Aware of his complete innocence, he still accepted condemnation and death as if he were a notorious criminal; and with everything under his control, he didn’t lift a finger to stop the injustice or quell the raging fury. If the mothers of his two fellow sufferers were there at that moment, despite the deep pain they must have felt witnessing their own children’s tragic end, they would have to acknowledge that public crimes deserved public punishment, and feelings of sympathy would likely mix with disapproval when they considered their fates. But the mother of Jesus saw her beloved Son condemned without cause and suffering against all justice. As she recognized his innocence, her sense of loss must have been all the more profound.
But his character was more than innocent; this, as the astonished centurion exclaimed, "Truly, this man was the Son of God!" Well might she wonder that no angel appeared to rescue the expiring Redeemer, and that he who had saved others did not save himself! Well might she have been confounded at the mysterious circumstance, that he whom winds and waves obeyed, and whose presence on earth was felt by universal nature, should die in apparent disgrace, exposed to the raillery of his inveterate enemies!
But his character was more than innocent; as the amazed centurion exclaimed, "Truly, this man was the Son of God!" She might rightly wonder why no angel showed up to rescue the dying Redeemer, and why he who had saved others didn’t save himself! She might have been baffled by the strange fact that he whom winds and waves obeyed, and whose presence was acknowledged by all of nature, should die in apparent disgrace, subjected to the mockery of his relentless enemies!
This afflicted mother was also a widow! Long since the evangelical narrative has dropped the name of her husband, doubtless because Joseph was no more; but Jesus survived to console her amidst domestic misfortunes, to cheer her declining days, to prop her falling house, to pour the wine of consolation into her cup of sorrow, and the light of celestial truth into her mind. He was all goodness, all perfection, who could never forget a mother--a widowed mother, wherever "he went about doing good"--was to this awful hour her staff and comfort. How keen was the edge of that piercing sword of which Simeon spake, and what unparralleled grief was hers when she saw the cross, and the tortures, and the blood of her Son!
This suffering mother was also a widow! The gospel story has long since left out her husband's name, probably because Joseph was no longer around; yet Jesus remained to comfort her through her struggles, to brighten her later years, to support her crumbling home, to fill her cup of sorrow with consolation, and to fill her mind with the light of divine truth. He embodied all goodness and perfection, someone who could never forget a mother—a widowed mother—wherever "he went about doing good"—was, even in this terrible moment, her source of strength and solace. How sharp was the edge of that piercing sword Simeon spoke of, and what unmatched grief was hers when she witnessed the cross, the suffering, and the blood of her Son!
Notwithstanding all, Mary is not seen wringing her hands and tearing her hair in distraction; nor is she heard to utter intemperate language against his persecutors, or to manifest resentment at the dispensations of Heaven: she neither curses man, nor blasphemes God; nor do we observe her fainting beneath the pressure of accumulated woes; but she stands near the cross, in solemn silence, pondering, in an attitude of profound meditation, and submitting to the purposes of Providence.
Notwithstanding everything, Mary isn't seen wringing her hands or pulling her hair in distress; she doesn't use harsh language against her tormentors, nor does she show anger at what fate has dealt her: she neither curses people nor blames God; and we don't see her collapsing under the weight of her hardships; instead, she stands near the cross, in quiet silence, reflecting deeply, and accepting the will of Providence.
Let us admire the power of that "grace" which is promised to Christians, "to help them in time of need," and of the efficacy of which the present scene furnishes so substantial an evidence. Is it possible that after such a record as this we should ever doubt or forget the divine assurances--"My grace is sufficient for thee"--"When thou passest through the waters I will be with thee, and through the rivers they shall not overflow thee; when thou walkest through the fire thou shall not be burnt, neither shall the flame kindle upon thee?" Should thy desponding heart be ready to distrust the wisdom or deny the goodness of thy "Father who is in heaven," when sorrows, diversified and oppressive, burden thy spirit, think of the mother of Jesus at the cross of her Son!
Let’s appreciate the power of that "grace" promised to Christians, "to help them in times of need," and how the current situation provides clear evidence of its effectiveness. Is it possible that, after such a promise, we could ever doubt or forget the divine reassurances—"My grace is enough for you"—"When you pass through the waters, I will be with you, and when you go through the rivers, they will not overwhelm you; when you walk through the fire, you will not be burned, nor will the flames scorch you?" If your discouraged heart is tempted to question the wisdom or goodness of your "Father who is in heaven," when sorrows are heavy and varied, remember the mother of Jesus at the cross of her Son!
If the sublime sympathy of Mary prevented the recollection of her personal condition, Jesus was not so overwhelmed with affliction as to be unmindful of the future lot of his poor, pennyless, helpless, widowed, and weeping mother; but committed her to the care of his disciple JOHN, directing him to regard her henceforward as a mother, and her to consider him as a son. Woman, behold thy son--"My beloved disciple will fulfil every office of filial tenderness, and at my request he will receive and provide for my destitute parent." Behold, said he, addressing John, behold thy mother; "take her to thy house, allow her to share thy means, respect and supply her as the most endeared relative of thy dying Lord. I have no property to leave, no silver or gold to distribute: this is my fond and my only bequest. I have confidence in thy attachment, and when thou dost minister to her thou wilt remember me."
If Mary’s deep compassion kept her from thinking about her own situation, Jesus wasn’t so overwhelmed with grief that he forgot about the future of his poor, penniless, helpless, widowed, and grieving mother. Instead, he entrusted her to his disciple John, instructing him to treat her as a mother and for her to see him as a son. Woman, behold thy son—“My beloved disciple will take care of her with all the love and kindness of a son, and at my request, he will support my needy mother.” Behold, he said to John, behold thy mother; “bring her into your home, share what you have with her, and treat her with the respect and care you would give to the most beloved family member of your dying Lord. I don’t have any possessions to leave, no silver or gold to give away: this is my heartfelt and only inheritance. I trust in your devotion, and when you care for her, you will be remembering me.”
From this exquisitely touching and instructive scene we must take a lesson of dependence on the providence of God. If he inflict unexpected trials, he affords unexpected supplies. His resources are numberless; and he who raised up John to supply the place of an endeared Son to Mary, can never be at loss for expedients when his people are in distress. One prop is removed, another is substituted. "O fear the Lord, all ye his saints, for there is no want to them that fear him." Earthly cisterns may indeed be broken, and temporal streams of enjoyment may cease, but "the fountain of living waters" is inexhaustible.
From this deeply touching and meaningful scene, we should learn about depending on God's guidance. When He brings unexpected challenges, He also provides unexpected solutions. His resources are countless; the same God who raised up John to take the place of Mary’s beloved Son will always have a way to help His people in times of trouble. When one support is taken away, another will take its place. "O fear the Lord, all you His saints, for there is no lack for those who fear Him." Earthly sources may indeed fail, and fleeting joys may end, but "the fountain of living waters" is endless.
Take a lesson of filial piety. Children are under an indispensable obligation to succour their aged parents. If amidst the agonies of crucifixion, Jesus so carefully provided for the future comfort of his maternal parent, be assured "he has set an example wherein we should follow his steps;" and disrespect to such claims is a dereliction of our character, and a forfeiture of our profession as the disciples of Christ.
Take a lesson on filial piety. Children have a crucial responsibility to support their elderly parents. If, even while suffering on the cross, Jesus took the time to ensure the future well-being of his mother, you can be sure "he has set an example that we should follow;" and showing disrespect to such responsibilities reflects poorly on our character and undermines our commitment as followers of Christ.
Learn to be prompt in your obedience to every requisition of your Lord. It is an honour to be employed by him in any service, whatever it may cost us. John did not hesitate, or indulge in surmisings; he did not think of the trouble, the expense, or the possible danger of harbouring the mother of one who was executed as an enemy to Cesar; but "from that hour that disciple took her unto his own home." If the sacred history had followed him to his lowly habitation, where our imaginations are ready to accompany John and his venerable charge, it would doubtless have exhibited a specimen of tender friendship and unwearied assiduity. What could John deny to the mother of his Lord? How eagerly would he promote her comfort! What "sweet converse" would they "hold together" upon the life, the miracles, the doctrines, the precepts, the death of Jesus! What a gleam of light and joy would the remembrance of one so dear throw upon the darkest scene of their lives, and how would the glory of his subsequent ascension, and dignity in the invisible world, occupy their daily intercourse and their most devotional moments! "The sweet hour of prime," and the serenity of "evening mild," and "twilight gray," would still find them amidst the wonders of the cross or the triumphs of the resurrection.
Learn to be quick to obey every request from your Lord. It’s an honor to serve Him in any way, no matter the cost. John didn’t hesitate or second-guess; he didn't dwell on the trouble, the expense, or the potential danger of sheltering the mother of someone executed as an enemy of Caesar. Instead, "from that hour that disciple took her unto his own home." If the sacred story had followed him to his humble dwelling, where we can easily imagine John and his esteemed guest, it would surely have shown a beautiful example of deep friendship and unwavering dedication. What could John refuse the mother of his Lord? How eagerly he would work to ensure her comfort! What "sweet conversations" they would "share together" about the life, miracles, teachings, and death of Jesus! What a ray of light and joy the memory of someone so precious would bring to the darkest moments of their lives, and how the glory of His future ascension and His status in the unseen world would fill their daily interactions and most heartfelt prayers! "The sweet hour of prime," the tranquility of "evening mild," and "twilight gray" would still find them in the midst of the wonders of the cross or the victories of the resurrection.
Nothing more is said of Mary till we come to the Acts of the Apostles, where a brief but honourable notice closes her history. In an upper room at Jerusalem "abode Peter, and James, and John, and Andrew, Philip, and Thomas, Bartholomew and Matthew, James the son of Alpheus, and Simon Zelotes, and Judas the brother of James. These all continued with one accord in prayer and supplication, with the women, and Mary, the mother of Jesus, and with his brethren."
Nothing more is mentioned about Mary until we reach the Acts of the Apostles, where a short but respectful mention wraps up her story. In an upper room in Jerusalem, "Peter, James, John, Andrew, Philip, Thomas, Bartholomew, Matthew, James the son of Alphaeus, Simon the Zealot, and Judas the brother of James were all together. They all devoted themselves to prayer and supplication, along with the women and Mary, the mother of Jesus, and his brothers."
It is supposed that John took her with him to Ephesus, where she died in an extreme old age. There is a letter of the oecumenical council of Ephesus, importing, that in the fifth century it was believed she was buried there; but some authors think she was buried at Jerusalem.
It is believed that John took her with him to Ephesus, where she lived to an extremely old age. There's a letter from the ecumenical council of Ephesus stating that in the fifth century, it was thought she was buried there; however, some writers think she was buried in Jerusalem.
Section IV.
Brief Account of the extravagant Regard which has been paid to the Virgin Mary at different Periods--the Names by which she has been addressed, and the Festivals instituted to honour her Memory--general Remarks on the Nature and Character of Superstition, particularly that of the Catholics.
A Brief Account of the lavish attention given to the Virgin Mary at various times—the names she has been called and the festivals created to celebrate her memory—along with general observations on the nature and characteristics of superstition, especially among Catholics.
After reviewing, as we have done in the preceding pages, the facts which are stated by the evangelists respecting the life of the mother of Jesus, the reader perhaps will not be displeased if he be presented with some of the fictions with which the fancy and the folly of the human race have combined to embellish her history. That she has a claim upon the respect of every age and nation, will not be disputed: but we must condemn as well as compassionate that weakness which has exalted her into an object of worship, and filled the temples, which ought to have been devoted to the service of God, with unauthorized addresses, unscriptural rites, and idolatrous disfigurements.
After reviewing the facts presented by the evangelists about the life of Mary, the mother of Jesus, the reader may not mind being introduced to some of the fictions that people's imagination and folly have created to enhance her story. It's undeniable that she deserves respect from every age and culture, but we must criticize, as well as empathize with, the tendency to elevate her to the level of worship, filling places that should be dedicated to the service of God with unwarranted prayers, unbiblical practices, and idolatrous distortions.
The first notice we have in history of undue honour being rendered to the Virgin Mary is about the close of the fourth century, when the Collyridians adored her as a goddess; and by various libations and sacrifices sought her protection, and hoped to avert her displeasure.
The first record we have in history of excessive honor being given to the Virgin Mary is around the end of the fourth century, when the Collyridians worshipped her as a goddess; through various offerings and sacrifices, they sought her protection and hoped to avoid her anger.
Soon after this period corruptions multiplied in the church to an extravagant degree, and mankind departed more and more from the simplicity of religion. A disposition to pomp and parade usually marks a decline in piety; for wherever "the beauty of holiness" is preserved, gaudy decorations and splendid formalities will be deemed unnecessary. Surely God is not honoured by a service which he has never instituted, and which is only calculated to divert the mind from the proper business of devotion and the supreme object of religious homage! In the fifth century, therefore, as piety languished, magnificence, with all her costly train, obtruded into notice. The riches of the church increased to an amazing extent; the altars, and chests for the preservation of relics, were made of silver; images adorned, or rather defiled, every niche; and the Virgin Mary, holding the child Jesus in her arms, every where occupied a conspicuous place. She had, besides, universally acquired the title of Θεοτουος, or mother of God, which occasioned the Nestorian controversy.
Soon after this period, corruption in the church grew rampant, and people moved away from the simplicity of religion. A tendency toward showiness often signifies a decline in faith; when "the beauty of holiness" is maintained, flashy decorations and elaborate rituals seem unnecessary. Clearly, God is not honored by a service he never established, which only distracts from genuine devotion and the ultimate focus of religious worship! By the fifth century, as faith weakened, grandeur and all its costly trappings came to the forefront. The church's wealth increased dramatically; the altars and relic boxes were made of silver; images filled every niche, often to their detriment; and the Virgin Mary, holding the child Jesus, was prominently featured everywhere. Additionally, she universally gained the title of Θεοτουος, or mother of God, which sparked the Nestorian controversy.
The idolatrous service of Mary assumed, in the tenth century, new forms of extravagance and absurdity. Among the Latin churches, masses were celebrated every sabbath; and afterward, what is termed the lesser office was performed in honour of St. Mary. There are also indications of the institution of the Rosary and Crown, by which her worshippers were to calculate the number of prayers offered: the former consisted of fifteen repetitions of the Lord's prayer, and a hundred and fifty salutations of the Virgin: the latter, of six or seven repetitions of the Lord's prayer, and six or seven times ten salutations, or Ave Marias.
The worship of Mary took on new levels of excess and irrationality in the tenth century. In the Latin churches, masses were held every Saturday, followed by what’s known as the lesser office in honor of St. Mary. There are also signs of the creation of the Rosary and Crown, which her followers used to keep track of the number of prayers said: the Rosary included fifteen repetitions of the Lord's prayer and one hundred and fifty greetings to the Virgin; the Crown involved six or seven repetitions of the Lord's prayer and six or seven times ten greetings, or Ave Marias.
About the year 1138 a solemn festival was instituted to celebrate the immaculate conception of the Virgin, of whom it was pretended, that her own birth partook of a similar purity to that which attached to her divine offspring. This doctrine was opposed by St. Bernard; but the French churches adopted it, and the superstition of the people contributed to its establishment. The subject was again debated with extreme virulence in the seventeenth century, between the Franciscans and Dominicans, in which the pope interposed a mediatorial power. The opinion of the former, who maintained the doctrine, was declared to have a high degree of probability in its favour, and the latter were required not to oppose it publicly; while the Franciscans were prohibited from treating the Dominican doctrine as erroneous. [20]
About the year 1138, a significant festival was established to celebrate the immaculate conception of the Virgin, who was believed to have been born with a purity similar to that of her divine son. This doctrine faced opposition from St. Bernard, but the French churches accepted it, and popular belief helped solidify its acceptance. The topic was hotly debated again in the seventeenth century between the Franciscans and Dominicans, leading the pope to step in as a mediator. The Franciscans' view, which supported the doctrine, was recognized as having considerable support, while the Dominicans were instructed not to oppose it publicly; at the same time, the Franciscans were forbidden from labeling the Dominican position as incorrect. [20]
It is lamentable to see the profusion of eloquence and ingenuity which some of the most penetrating minds have expended on this subject. In all the Catholic writings we meet with impassioned addresses to the Virgin, appeals on her behalf to the feelings of piety, and a frequent celebration of her matchless perfections. The theological oracle of the French church distinctly states that "as the innocence of Jesus Christ is the life and salvation of sinners, so, through the innocence of the holy Virgin, he obtains pardon for the guilty," exhorting his hearers to "cleanse away their sins in the glorious splendour of her incorruptible purity," and adding, that "to undertake to describe the perfections of Mary, would be to fathom a bottomless abyss."
It’s unfortunate to witness the abundance of eloquence and creativity that some of the sharpest minds have dedicated to this topic. In all Catholic writings, we encounter passionate addresses to the Virgin, appeals to her in the name of piety, and a frequent celebration of her unmatched qualities. The theological authority of the French church clearly states that "just as the innocence of Jesus Christ is the life and salvation of sinners, so, through the innocence of the holy Virgin, he grants forgiveness to the guilty," urging his listeners to "wash away their sins in the glorious brightness of her untainted purity," and adding that "to try to describe Mary’s perfections would be like trying to measure a bottomless abyss."
After representing the Saviour as making particular choice of Mary for himself, Bossuet bestows upon her the epithets of beloved creature, extraordinary creature, unique and privileged creature; and continues thus: "The Saviour imparted to his apostles and ministers whatever was most adapted to promote the salvation of mankind; but he communicated to his holy mother whatever was most pleasing, most glorious, and most delightful to himself; consequently, I doubt not that he made Mary innocent. She is his unique, and he is hers. Dilectus meus mihi et ego illi ('my beloved is mine and I am his.') I have only him, and he has only me." I know well that innocence ought not to be easily lavished on our corrupt nature, but it is no profuse expenditure to bestow it upon his mother only: while to refuse to her would surely be too great a reserve.
After presenting the Savior as choosing Mary specifically for himself, Bossuet gives her the titles of beloved being, extraordinary being, unique and privileged being; and continues: "The Savior shared with his apostles and ministers what was most suited to promote the salvation of humanity; but he gave his holy mother whatever was most pleasing, most glorious, and most delightful to him; therefore, I have no doubt that he made Mary innocent. She is his unique one, and he is hers. Dilectus meus mihi et ego illi ('my beloved is mine and I am his.'). I have only him, and he has only me." I understand that innocence shouldn't be easily given to our corrupt nature, but it’s not excessive to grant it only to his mother: while withholding it from her would definitely be too much restraint.
"No, my brethren, this is not my Saviour's conduct: on Mary, from the moment of her birth, I behold the innocence of Jesus Christ shining and adorning her head. O honour this new ray of light which her divine Son already sheds upon her! 'The night is far spent, the day is at hand;' Jesus will quickly bring this day by his own blessed presence. O happy day! O day without cloud! O day, which the innocence of the divine Jesus will render so serene and pure, when wilt thou come to illuminate the world?--Christians, it approaches; let us rejoice in already discovering its dawn in the birth of the holy Virgin--Natâ Virgine surrexit aurora, says the pious father Damien. Can you be astonished after this, if I assert that Mary was without spot from the first moment of her appearance in the world? As the great day of Christ was to be so clear and splendid, was it not proper that even its commencement should be beautiful, and that the serenity of the morning should indicate that of the day? 'It is on this account,' as father Damien observes, 'that Mary, who introduced this illustrious day diffused a brightness over the morning by her nativity--Maria, veri proevia luminis, nativitate suâ mane clarissimum serenavit.' Hasten then, brethren, hasten with joy to behold the beginnings of this new day: we shall see it shine in the attractive light of an untarnished purity!"......Bossuet's Sermon.
"No, my friends, this is not how my Savior behaves: in Mary, from the moment she was born, I see the innocence of Jesus Christ shining and adorning her head. O honor this new ray of light that her divine Son already casts upon her! 'The night is far spent, the day is at hand;' Jesus will soon bring this day with his own blessed presence. O happy day! O day without clouds! O day, which the innocence of the divine Jesus will make so serene and pure, when will you come to enlighten the world? Christians, it is approaching; let us rejoice in already seeing its dawn in the birth of the holy Virgin—Natâ Virgine surrexit aurora, says the devoted father Damien. Can you be surprised after this if I claim that Mary was spotless from the very first moment she appeared in the world? Since the great day of Christ was to be so clear and brilliant, was it not fitting that even its beginning should be beautiful, and that the tranquility of the morning should foreshadow that of the day? 'It is for this reason,' as father Damien notes, 'that Mary, who introduced this glorious day, spread brightness over the morning through her birth—Maria, veri proevia luminis, nativitate suâ mane clarissimum serenavit.' So hurry, friends, hurry joyfully to witness the beginnings of this new day: we will see it shine in the inviting light of unblemished purity!"......Bossuet's Sermon.
Bossuet had sufficient ingenuity to construct a plausible defence of a sentiment which, however adapted to supply a theme for eloquent declamation, is not to be found in Scripture. "It must be admitted," says he, "that Mary would have been involved in the general ruin of mankind, had not the merciful Physician who heals our diseases determined to imbue her beforehand with his preventing grace. Sin, which like a torrent overflowed the world, would have polluted this holy Virgin with its poisonous waves; but Omnipotence can stop, whenever he pleases, the most impetuous force. Observe with what ardour the sun pursues the vast circuit which Providence has assigned him; and yet you cannot be ignorant that God once caused him to stand still in the midst of heaven at the voice of a man. Those who inhabit the vicinity of Jordan, the celebrated river of Palestine, know with what rapidity it discharges itself into the Dead Sea, if I am correct as to the place; nevertheless, the whole Israelitish army saw it roll back to its source to form a passage for the ark, where their omnipotent Sovereign resided. Is any thing more natural than the consuming effect of heat in fire issuing out of a furnace? And yet was not the impious Nebuchadnezzar surprised with the sight of three happy individuals rejoicing in the midst of the flames which his merciless minions had kindled--but kindled in vain? But notwithstanding all these examples, may we not truly say, that there is no fire which does not burn, that the sun performs his course with unceasing progress, and that no river flows back to its source? We are accustomed to a similar mode of speaking every day, without being checked by these extraordinary occurrences, of which no one is ignorant. Whence does this arise, Christians? Doubtless from the habit of conversing according to the ordinary course of things; though God chooses sometimes to act conformably to the dictates of his own omnipotence, independently of human notions.
Bossuet had enough cleverness to create a convincing defense of a sentiment that, while suitable for inspiring eloquent speeches, isn't found in Scripture. "It's true," he says, "that Mary would have faced the overall destruction of humanity if it weren't for the merciful Physician who heals our ailments, deciding to fill her with His grace ahead of time. Sin, which surged like a flood across the world, would have tainted this holy Virgin with its toxic waves; but an all-powerful God can stop even the strongest force whenever He wants. Look at how passionately the sun travels along the vast path assigned to it by Providence; yet, you should know that God once made it stand still in the sky at the command of a man. Those living near the Jordan, the famous river of Palestine, are aware of how quickly it flows into the Dead Sea, if I remember correctly; still, the entire Israelite army witnessed it roll back upstream to create a path for the ark, where their all-powerful Sovereign dwelled. Is anything more natural than the burning effect of fire coming from a furnace? Yet, wasn't the wicked Nebuchadnezzar astonished to see three blessed individuals celebrating in the flames lit by his cruel servants, but lit in vain? Despite all these examples, can we truly say that no fire burns, that the sun continues its path without pause, and that no river flows back to its source? We're used to talking in this way every day, without being troubled by these extraordinary events, which everyone knows about. Where does this come from, Christians? Surely, it arises from the habit of speaking according to the usual course of things; even though God sometimes chooses to act according to His own omnipotence, independent of human expectations."
"I am not astonished, therefore, that the apostle Paul has expressed himself in such general terms respecting the sin of our first parents' having occasioned the death of all their posterity. According the natural course of things, which the apostle is stating in that place, to be born of the race of Adam necessarily includes, in the ordinary sense of the word, being born in sin. It is not more natural for fire to burn, than for this accursed depravity to infect every one it touches with corruption and death. No poison is more active, no plague more powerful and penetrating. But I maintain, that this curse, however universal, that all these propositions, however general they may be, do not preclude the exceptions which may be made by the Supreme Disposer, or particular interpositions of his authority. And on what occasion, great God, could thine unlimited power, which itself is law, be more properly employed than in conferring peculiar favour upon Mary?" [21]
"I’m not surprised that the apostle Paul has spoken so broadly about how the sin of our first parents led to the death of all their descendants. According to the natural order of things that the apostle describes in that context, being born of Adam's line inevitably means being born into sin. It’s as natural for this cursed depravity to corrupt everyone it touches as it is for fire to burn. No poison is more effective, no plague more powerful and invasive. However, I argue that this curse, no matter how widespread, and all these statements, no matter how general, do not rule out the exceptions that the Supreme Disposer may make, or specific interventions of His authority. And on what occasion, great God, could Your limitless power, which itself is law, be better used than in granting special favor to Mary?" [21]
In the Litanies the Virgin is denominated "the Mother of God, the Queen of Angels, the Refuge of Sinners, the Mother of Mercy, the Gate of Heaven, the Mystic Rose, the Virgin of Virgins," &c. [22]
In the Litanies, the Virgin is called "the Mother of God, the Queen of Angels, the Refuge of Sinners, the Mother of Mercy, the Gate of Heaven, the Mystic Rose, the Virgin of Virgins," etc. [22]
Father Barry, in his "Paradise opened to Philagia by a hundred Devotions to the Mother of God, of easy performance," says, "It is open to such as confine themselves to their chambers, or carry about them an image of the Virgin, and look steadfastly upon it--who, night and morning, beg her benediction, standing near some of the churches dedicated to her, or contribute to the relief of the poor for her sake--who, out of a pious regard for her, avoid pronouncing the name of Mary when they read, but make use of some other instead of it--who beg of the angels to salute the mother of God in their name, who give honourable appellations to her images, and cast amorous glances at them," &c.
Father Barry, in his "Paradise Opened to Philagia Through a Hundred Devotions to the Mother of God, Easy to Perform," says, "It is accessible to those who stay in their rooms, carry a picture of the Virgin with them, and focus on it—who, morning and night, ask for her blessing while near some of the churches dedicated to her, or help the poor in her name—who, out of respect for her, avoid saying the name of Mary while reading, instead using another name—who ask the angels to greet the Mother of God on their behalf, who refer to her images with honorable titles, and gaze at them with affection," etc.
In this work it is expressly stated, that "as many separate devotions to the mother of God as you find in this book, are so many keys of heaven, which will open all paradise to you, provided you only practise them;" and afterward it is added, that "any one of them is sufficient." Take the following specimen: "Salute the holy Virgin wherever you meet her image; repeat the little chaplet of the ten pleasures of the Virgin; often pronounce the name of Mary; commission the angels to give your duty to her; cherish a desire to build more churches to her than all the kings of the world put together; wish her a good day every morning, and a good night every evening; say the Ave Maria every day, in honour of the heart of Mary." [23]
In this work, it’s clearly stated that "the numerous devotions to the mother of God found in this book are like keys to heaven, which will unlock all of paradise for you, as long as you practice them." It goes on to say that "any one of them is enough." Consider this example: "Greet the holy Virgin whenever you see her image; recite the small chaplet of the ten joys of the Virgin; frequently say the name of Mary; ask the angels to deliver your respects to her; wish to build more churches in her honor than all the kings of the world combined; wish her a good day every morning and a good night every evening; say the Ave Maria every day, in honor of the heart of Mary." [23]
In the earliest ages she was called Queen of angels and Mother of God; afterward, the spirit of controversy induced her advocates to adopt every possible device to make her considerable among heretics, and to accustom her devotees to extravagant expressions. She has been represented as the disposer and depository of God's favours, the treasurer and queen of heaven, the spring and fountain of salvation and life, the mother of light, the intercessor between God and man, the hope of mankind, the ocean of the Deity! Almost an absolute and sovereign power over her Son our Saviour has been ascribed to her. The psalter, nay the whole Bible, has been applied to her, and proofs by miracles and apparitions furnished, that the virgin appeases the wrath of Christ against sinners, and possesses the power of absolving, binding, and loosening. Temples and altars have been erected, and invocations addressed to her.
In the earliest times, she was known as the Queen of Angels and Mother of God; later, the spirit of debate led her supporters to use every possible method to elevate her status among non-believers and to train her followers to use extravagant language. She has been depicted as the dispenser and guardian of God's blessings, the treasurer and queen of heaven, the source and fountain of salvation and life, the mother of light, the mediator between God and humanity, the hope of people, the ocean of the divine! Almost absolute power over her Son, our Savior, has been attributed to her. The psalter, indeed the entire Bible, has been related to her, and evidence through miracles and visions has been provided that shows the virgin calms Christ's anger towards sinners and has the ability to forgive, bind, and loosen. Temples and altars have been built, and prayers directed to her.
The Jesuit, who published the Psalter of our Lady, in French, exhorts the devout Christian who pronounces these words in the introduction, Holy Lady, open thou my lips, &c. "to make two signs of the cross when he repeats them, one upon his lips with his thumb, and the other upon himself with his hand, as the priests do when they begin their canonical hours." This method, he assures us, will procure the devotee the honour and happiness of being canon or canoness of heaven; and our lady, to reward so conspicuous and instructive an act of devotion, will admit him into paradise. He gives a pattern of the vows which the devotee is to make "for Jesus and Mary's sake, and for all the lovers of them both, whether male or female." He describes the alliance to be made by him with the most amiable and honourable mother of all mothers, the act of repentance and contrition for the reconciliation of himself with her, and all the ceremonies, great and small, by which he may devote himself to the blessed Virgin.
The Jesuit who published the Psalter of our Lady in French encourages devout Christians to say the words in the introduction, Holy Lady, open thou my lips, etc. He suggests making two signs of the cross when repeating them: one on the lips with the thumb and the other on the body with the hand, just like priests do when they begin their prayers. He assures us that this practice will grant the devotee the honor and joy of becoming a canon or canoness of heaven, and in return for such a meaningful act of devotion, our lady will welcome them into paradise. He provides a model for the vows that the devotee should take "for Jesus and Mary's sake, and for all their lovers, whether male or female." He outlines the commitment to be made to the most amiable and honorable mother of all mothers, the act of repentance and sorrow for reconciling himself with her, and all the rituals, big and small, through which he may dedicate himself to the blessed Virgin.
Whoever hopes to obtain the benedictions of the Virgin, must salute her every day, both at his going out and coming in. The legends have transmitted several remarkable instances of the advantages arising from the repetition of the Ave Maria--not to mention a thousand day's indulgence granted by some of the popes (Leo X. and Paul V.) to those who shall repeat it at the hour of the Angelus.
Whoever wants to receive the blessings of the Virgin must greet her every day, both when leaving and returning. The legends have shared several notable examples of the benefits that come from repeating the Ave Maria—not to mention the thousand-day indulgence awarded by some popes (Leo X. and Paul V.) to those who recite it at the hour of the Angelus.
St. Margarite, of Hungary, said an Ave kneeling before every image of the Virgin she met in her way--St. Catharine, of Sienna, repeated as many Aves as she went up steps to her house.
St. Marguerite of Hungary kneeled and said an Ave in front of every image of the Virgin she passed by—St. Catherine of Siena said as many Aves as she climbed the steps to her house.
Fasting on Saturday, in honour of the Virgin, is looked upon as a treasure of indulgences and delights, and as an excellent preservative against eternal damnation.
Fasting on Saturday, in honor of the Virgin, is seen as a valuable source of indulgences and pleasures, and as a great way to protect oneself from eternal damnation.
Various festivals are instituted to commemorate her, such as the Purification, the Annunciation, the Visitation, and others.
Various festivals have been created to honor her, such as the Purification, the Annunciation, the Visitation, and others.
The fifth of August is the festival of our Lady of the Snow. We are informed that the solemnization of it was owing to a miracle. When Liberius was pontiff, a patrician, or Roman nobleman, finding himself old and childless, resolved, with his wife's approbation, to make the blessed Virgin his sole heiress. The vow being made with great devotion, their principal concern, in the next place, was to employ their inheritance conformably to our Lady's will: and accordingly they applied themselves to fasting, praying, giving alms to the poor, and visiting the sick, to know her pleasure.
The fifth of August is the festival of our Lady of the Snow. We learn that its celebration was due to a miracle. When Liberius was pope, a wealthy Roman nobleman, realizing he was old and had no children, decided, with his wife's agreement, to make the blessed Virgin his sole heir. After making this vow with deep devotion, their main concern was to use their inheritance in line with our Lady's wishes. So, they focused on fasting, praying, giving to the poor, and visiting the sick to discover her desires.
The Virgin at length appeared to each of them in a dream, and told them "it was her and her Son's will, that they should employ their effects in erecting a church for her on a particular part of the Mons Esquilinus, which they should find covered with snow." The pious husband first communicated the revelation to his wife, who told him, with great surprise, that she had had the same revelation that very night. But, supposing the two dreams had not proved alike, an excess of zeal would have been sufficient to have given them all the conformity that was requisite; These two devotees went immediately and declared their dreams to the pope, who perceived that he was a third man in the revelation; for his holiness had been favoured with the same vision. It was no longer questioned, but that heaven was engaged in this affair. The pontiff assembled the clergy together, and there was a solemn procession to Mount Esquiline, on purpose to find out whether the miracle were real or not; when the place specified in the dream was found covered with snow. The ground was exactly of a suitable extent to erect a church upon, which was afterward called Liberius's Basilica, and St. Mary ad præcepe, (because the manger, which was used as a cradle for our Lady, was brought thither from Bethlehem,) and is now called St. Mary Major. Every festival day, the commemoration of this miracle is revived, by letting fall white jessamine leaves, after so artificial a manner, as to imitate the falling of snow upon the ground. [24]
The Virgin eventually appeared to each of them in a dream and told them that it was her and her Son's wish for them to use their resources to build a church for her in a specific area of the Mons Esquilinus, which they would find covered in snow. The devoted husband first shared the revelation with his wife, who told him, with great surprise, that she had received the same message that very night. However, if their dreams had not been identical, an excessive eagerness would have been enough to create the necessary conformity; these two believers went straight away and shared their dreams with the pope, who realized he was a third participant in the revelation, as his holiness had experienced the same vision. It was clear that heaven was involved in this matter. The pope gathered the clergy, and there was a solemn procession to Mount Esquiline to verify whether the miracle was genuine; when they reached the spot mentioned in the dream, it was indeed covered in snow. The area was just the right size to build a church on, which was later named Liberius's Basilica, and St. Mary ad præcepe (because the manger that served as a cradle for our Lady was brought there from Bethlehem), and is now known as St. Mary Major. Every festival day, the memory of this miracle is celebrated by dropping white jasmine leaves in such a way that it mimics the falling of snow on the ground. [24]
It has even been asserted, that the apostle Peter consecrated a chapel to the Virgin, a story which accords perfectly well with other absurdities. The Spaniards attribute a similar act of devotion to James at Saragossa; and some add, that the angels were the architects of the chapel. It is decorated in the most costly manner with silver angels, lamps, and other furniture, with the Virgin magnificently dressed on a marble pillar. The walls are hung with feet, arms, hands, and other parts of the human body, as grateful oblations to the Virgin, for the miraculous cures she is supposed to have performed upon these members.
It’s even been claimed that the apostle Peter dedicated a chapel to the Virgin, a story that fits right in with other ridiculous tales. The Spaniards attribute a similar act of devotion to James in Saragossa; and some say that angels were the ones who built the chapel. It’s decorated lavishly with silver angels, lamps, and other furnishings, with the Virgin beautifully dressed on a marble pillar. The walls are adorned with feet, arms, hands, and other human body parts, offered as thanks to the Virgin for the miraculous healings she’s believed to have performed on these body parts.
At Madrid, our lady of Atocha resides in a chapel which blazes with a hundred lamps made of gold and silver, and is celebrated for as many miracles as at Loretto and other places. The history of her first settlement at Liesse, in Picardy, is thus related. During the crusades, an Egyptian princess resolving to have an image of the Virgin, addressed herself to three gentlemen of Picardy, who were prisoners at Cairo, one of whom made an attempt to paint her, though ignorant of the art. Having failed, he and his companions presented earnest supplications to the Virgin, after which they fell asleep. As soon as they awoke, they found an image of our Lady, accurately performed, which they transmitted to the princess; who, in return, set them at liberty. She was, of course, converted to the Christian faith by this image; and the three gentlemen miraculously escaped out of Egypt, and on a sudden found themselves, by a continuation of the miracle, in Picardy, on the very spot where the church of our Lady of Liesse is now erected.
At Madrid, our Lady of Atocha is housed in a chapel filled with a hundred lamps made of gold and silver, and is known for as many miracles as places like Loretto. The story of her original site in Liesse, Picardy, goes like this. During the crusades, an Egyptian princess wanted an image of the Virgin. She reached out to three gentlemen from Picardy who were prisoners in Cairo. One of them tried to paint her but was not skilled in the art. After failing, he and his friends earnestly prayed to the Virgin, and then fell asleep. When they woke up, they found a beautifully crafted image of our Lady, which they sent to the princess. In return, she freed them. She, of course, was converted to Christianity because of this image, and the three gentlemen miraculously escaped Egypt and suddenly found themselves, thanks to the miracle, back in Picardy, right at the spot where the church of Our Lady of Liesse now stands.
Her devotees carry representations of the Virgin about them, deck her images with flowers, dress them in silks or other costly ornaments, burn tapers before them, kiss and look upon them with a languishing eye, touch them with their chaplets, rub their handkerchiefs upon them, and salute them with the profoundest veneration.
Her followers carry representations of the Virgin with them, adorn her images with flowers, dress them in silks or other expensive decorations, light candles in front of them, kiss and gaze at them with longing, touch them with their rosaries, rub their handkerchiefs on them, and greet them with deep respect.
Her relics are innumerable--such as her wedding ring, handkerchiefs, combs, slippers and goods of every description, as kitchen furniture, toilette, earthenware, lamps; and even, as it is pretended, her gloves, bed, chair, head-clothes, with other rarities.
Her relics are countless—like her wedding ring, handkerchiefs, combs, slippers, and items of every kind, such as kitchenware, personal items, pottery, and lamps; and even, as it is said, her gloves, bed, chair, head coverings, along with other curiosities.
"Surely," says archbishop Tillotson, "if this blessed among women, the mother of our Lord, (for I keep to the titles which the Scripture gives her,) have any sense of what we do here below, she cannot but look down with the greatest disdain upon that sacrilegious and idolatrous worship which is paid to her, to the high dishonour of the great God and our Saviour, and the infinite scandal of his religion. How can she, without indignation, behold how they play the fool in the church of Rome about her; what an idol they make of her image, and with what sottishness they give divine honour to it; how they place her in their idolatrous pictures in equal rank with the blessed Trinity, and turn the salutation of the angel, Ave Maria, hail Mary, full of grace, into a kind of prayer; and, in their bead-roll of devotion, repeat it ten times, for once that they say the Lord's prayer, as of greater virtue and efficacy? And, indeed, they almost justle out the devotion due to Almighty God and our blessed Saviour, by their endless idolatry to her.
"Surely," says Archbishop Tillotson, "if this blessed among women, the mother of our Lord (because I stick to the titles the Scripture gives her) has any awareness of what we do down here, she must look down with great disdain on the sacrilegious and idolatrous worship given to her, which brings great dishonor to the mighty God and our Savior, and causes endless scandal to His religion. How can she, without feeling anger, see how they act foolishly in the Roman church about her; how they turn her image into an idol, and with what foolishness they offer divine honor to it; how they place her in their idolatrous pictures on the same level as the blessed Trinity, and transform the angel's greeting, Ave Maria, hail Mary, full of grace, into a sort of prayer; and, in their prayer beads, say it ten times for every time they say the Lord's Prayer, treating it as if it has greater value and power? Indeed, they nearly push aside the devotion due to Almighty God and our blessed Savior with their endless idolatry to her."
"So that the greater part of their religion, both public and private, is made up of that which was no part at all of the religion of the apostles and primitive Christians; nay, which plainly contradicts it: for that expressly teacheth us, that there is but one object of our prayers, and one Mediator by whom we are to make our addresses to God. 'There is one God, and one Mediator between God and man, the man Christ Jesus,' says St. Paul, when he gives a standing rule concerning prayer in the Christian church. And yet, notwithstanding all the care that our blessed Saviour and his apostles could take to prevent gross idolatry of the blessed mother of our Lord, how blindly and wilfully have the church of Rome run into it! and, in despite of the clearest evidence and conviction, do obstinately and impudently persist in it, and justify themselves in so abominable a practice."
"So, a big part of their religion, both in public and private, consists of things that weren't part of the beliefs of the apostles and early Christians; in fact, it directly contradicts it: because it clearly teaches us that there is only one object of our prayers, and one Mediator through whom we should reach out to God. 'There is one God, and one Mediator between God and man, the man Christ Jesus,' St. Paul says when he sets a standard for prayer in the Christian church. Yet, despite all the efforts that our blessed Savior and his apostles made to avoid the blatant idolatry of the blessed mother of our Lord, how blindly and intentionally has the Roman church fallen into it! And, in spite of the clearest evidence and conviction, they stubbornly and shamelessly continue in it, justifying themselves in such a terrible practice."
In the homage rendered to the Virgin Mary by the Catholics, the servility of superstition appears blended with the zeal of enthusiasm. Having departed from Scripture, that only light which shines upon the path of obedience, and conducts to God, they naturally lose themselves amidst the perplexities of error and the mazes of falsehood: it need not, therefore, occasion surprise though their course should be eccentric, or their conduct preposterous. The passions being chiefly engaged in this service, and kept in exercise by fear or fondness, reason retires; and imagination, supported by these auxiliaries, sways the sceptre. The absurdities, however, to which under such circumstances the human mind becomes addicted, would seem utterly unaccountable, were it not for the gradual manner of their influence. The victory over judgment and common sense is not secured at a blow, but by perpetual insinuation. The hopes or fears of mankind are wrought upon individually from the period of infancy, long previous to the age when reason attains its vigour and maturity,--and nationally by a slow and almost insensible accumulation of frivolous or ridiculous observances from century to century. A natural consciousness of weakness renders man the dupe of deception, and an equal sense of guilt makes him the slave of terror. Hence he readily avails himself of every means which he fancies capable of alleviating his anxieties, and in his eagerness to escape the wretchedness of apprehension or the suffering of evil, flies to unscriptural resources.
In the devotion shown to the Virgin Mary by Catholics, the submissiveness of superstition seems mixed with passionate enthusiasm. Straying from Scripture, which is the only true guide that leads to obedience and God, they easily get lost in confusion and lies. It shouldn't be surprising if their actions seem odd or unreasonable. With emotions mainly involved in this practice and fueled by fear or affection, reason takes a backseat; imagination, supported by these feelings, takes control. The strange beliefs that people adopt in such situations might seem completely baffling, but this can be explained by how slowly they take hold. The defeat of logic and common sense doesn’t happen suddenly, but through constant suggestion. People’s hopes and fears are influenced individually from childhood, long before reason fully develops, and nationally through the slow and barely noticeable buildup of silly or absurd practices over the centuries. A natural sense of weakness makes people easy targets for deception, and a shared sense of guilt turns them into slaves of fear. As a result, they eagerly turn to anything they think can ease their worries, and in their desperation to escape the torment of fear or suffering, they grab onto unbiblical solutions.
The pre-eminence of man over the brute creation arises chiefly from his capacity of knowing God and serving him in the appointed exercises of religion; and yet the perversion of this capacity, by the invention of superstitious ceremonies, has rendered him utterly contemptible. In the services of real piety, he appears elevated to the summit of creation, his nature seems ennobled, and his character encircled with glory; but, in the practices of superstition, he is degraded to the lowest depth of meanness of which an intellectual and immortal being is capable. By the former he soars to "glory, honour, and immortality;" by the latter he sinks to wretchedness and ruin. In the one case he is useful and happy; in the other, inactive, isolated, and full of disquietude; and thus either rises into grandeur or falls into littleness,--is an angel or a brute!
The superiority of humans over animals mainly comes from our ability to know God and worship Him through religious practices. However, the misuse of this ability through superstitious rituals has made us seem utterly despicable. In true acts of devotion, we appear at the pinnacle of creation, our nature feels elevated, and our character shines with glory. But in superstitious practices, we are brought down to the lowest level of worthlessness that an intelligent and immortal being can reach. Through genuine faith, we rise to "glory, honor, and immortality," while through superstition, we plummet into misery and destruction. In one scenario, we are productive and joyful; in the other, we are inactive, alienated, and full of discomfort. Thus, we either ascend to greatness or descend into insignificance—becoming an angel or a beast!
Whoever reviews the several religious errors of the Pagan, Jewish, and Christian communities, will admit, that the history of superstition constitutes one of the most offensive pages in the annals of mankind; he will see the object of worship misrepresented, the universe partitioned into petty sovereignties, and Deity divided, contracted, and localized; religion turned into mockery, and mockery into religion.
Whoever looks at the various religious mistakes of the Pagan, Jewish, and Christian communities will agree that the history of superstition is one of the most troubling chapters in human history; they will see the object of worship misrepresented, the universe divided into small realms, and God broken down, limited, and confined to specific places; religion twisted into a joke, and that joke turned back into religion.
It is somewhat difficult to trace the operations and to ascertain the true character of superstition, although it has prevailed so extensively in the world, and produced such extraordinary effects. Amongst other anomalies, this is observable, that it not only has led captive weak and ignorant minds, which being unable to detect a specious sophism, or to depart from a general practice, may easily be supposed incapable of resisting its fascination; but it has been known to seduce and enchain some of the noblest orders of intellect, and the most cultivated of human understandings. Whole nations and successive generations have been subjected to its influence, furnishing ample evidence of that statement, which, if it be not repeated in every page of Scripture, lies at the foundation of all its truths; and into which many of the peculiarities of this principle may be resolved: "The world by wisdom knew not God."
It’s somewhat challenging to trace how superstition operates and to understand its true nature, even though it has been so widespread and has caused such incredible effects. One surprising aspect is that it has not only captured the attention of weak and uninformed minds—those who can’t see through a misleading argument or break away from common practices—but it has also been known to attract and dominate some of the brightest minds and the most educated individuals. Entire nations and generations have been under its influence, providing strong support for the idea that, while it may not be stated on every page of the Bible, it is central to all its truths: "The world by wisdom knew not God."
Superstition is unquestionably founded in mean and absurd ideas of the moral attributes of the Deity, which produce corresponding actions, and in assigning to him an arbitrary character, deriving pleasure from what has no connexion with the happiness of the worshipper. A consistent and dignified conduct can only result from a just estimate of the divine perfections, and a correct view of moral obligation. The worship we render to a superior being, must necessarily be shaped and regulated by our conceptions of the nature of God; consequently, mankind will degenerate into error and folly, proportionate to their departure from the representations of Scripture respecting the spirituality of his essence.
Superstition is definitely based on shallow and ridiculous ideas about the moral qualities of God, which lead to corresponding actions, and in giving Him a random character that finds pleasure in things that don’t relate to the happiness of the worshipper. Consistent and dignified behavior can only come from a proper understanding of divine qualities and a clear view of moral responsibility. The worship we give to a higher being must inevitably be shaped and guided by our views on the nature of God; therefore, humanity will fall into error and foolishness in proportion to how far they stray from the portrayals in Scripture regarding the spirituality of His essence.
To this source may be traced especially the principles and practices of the Romish church, in which reason is outraged, religion caricatured, and God dishonoured. Transubstantiation is a doctrine manifestly absurd and impious; and the practice of presenting those supplications to dead saints, which the Supreme Being alone can hear and answer, is no less ridiculous, as well as subversive of true piety. Perhaps, however, no deviation from common sense is more remarkable than those extravagancies of the Catholics which respect the Virgin Mary; and yet these have not only been practised by the multitude, but defended by men of learning with the utmost subtlety and the warmest zeal. In fact, she has been praised by every Catholic pen for ages; and every term that language could supply has been put in requisition to extol her merits.
To this source can be traced especially the principles and practices of the Catholic Church, where reason is violated, religion is mocked, and God is dishonored. Transubstantiation is a doctrine that is clearly absurd and irreverent; and the practice of asking dead saints for help—when only the Supreme Being can hear and respond—is equally laughable and undermines true devotion. However, perhaps the most striking departure from common sense is the extreme views Catholics have regarding the Virgin Mary; yet these beliefs have not only been embraced by the masses, but also defended by educated individuals with great complexity and fervor. In fact, she has been praised by every Catholic writer for centuries; and every word that language could offer has been used to highlight her virtues.
Let the view we have given of these misstatements excite us to self-examination, in order that we may discover any incorrectness or deficiency in our own apprehensions of religion, and become vigilant over those errors into which we may be apt to deviate. It will be studying man to some purpose, if the better we are acquainted with the history of the human mind, the greater the circumspection we exercise over ourselves. We shall then be less imposed upon by the speciousness of falsehood, and less betrayed by the weakness of our passions; we shall be led to "present our bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God," and feel that it is our "reasonable service."
Let the perspective we've shared on these inaccuracies inspire us to reflect on ourselves, so we can identify any misunderstandings or lack of clarity in our own understanding of faith, and stay alert to the mistakes we might fall into. It will be meaningful to study humanity if knowing more about the history of the human mind helps us to be more careful in our own actions. This way, we will be less deceived by the allure of falsehood and less misled by our emotional weaknesses; we will be motivated to "present our bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God," and recognize that it is our "reasonable service."
Elizabeth.
Chapter II.
The angelic Appearance to Zacharias--Birth of John--Characters of Elizabeth and Zacharias--Importance of domestic Union being founded on Religion, shown in them--their venerable Age--the characteristic Features of their Piety--the Happiness of a Life like theirs--the Effect it is calculated to produce on others--the Perpetuation of holy friendship through immortal Ages--the miserable Condition of the irreligious.
The angelic visit to Zacharias—Birth of John—Traits of Elizabeth and Zacharias—The importance of a domestic union based on religion, demonstrated through their lives—their respected age—the defining aspects of their faith—the joy of a life like theirs—the influence it has on others—the enduring nature of holy friendships across eternal ages—the unfortunate state of those without faith.
Obscure as were the circumstances in which Christ appeared, Infinite Wisdom saw fit to furnish miraculous attestations to his character and mission. This evidence attended him during the whole of his career, investing him with a heavenly glory, and rendering his pre-eminence distinctly visible to the eye of faith, notwithstanding his assumed inferiority.
Obscure as the circumstances were in which Christ appeared, Infinite Wisdom chose to provide miraculous proof of his character and mission. This evidence followed him throughout his entire life, surrounding him with a heavenly glory, and making his greatness clearly visible to the eye of faith, despite his chosen humility.
It was in unison with this scheme of Providence to send the most exalted of angelic beings to announce the birth of Messiah, and to prepare the minds of Mary his mother, of the shepherds who were to circulate the intelligence, and of others more nearly or more remotely interested in the event, by celestial visitations. For similar reasons it comported with the nature of this wonderful event, to attach something peculiar and even miraculous to the birth of his precursor, whose destined office it should be to "prepare the way of the Lord," by uttering his "voice in the wilderness," and intimating to mankind the mighty transformations about to be effected in the moral state of the world. Six months, therefore, previously to the annunciation to Mary, the angel Gabriel descended to proclaim "glad tidings" to Zacharias. In the performance of his customary service as a priest, he had gone into the temple to burn incense, while the people were praying without the holy place. On a sudden, he perceived an angel standing on the right side of the altar, and became exceedingly agitated, till the benevolent spirit addressed him in affectionate and congratulatory terms. Ah! they have no reason to dread a message from the world of spirits, or to be filled with apprehensions at the sight of other orders of beings than those with which they are conversant, who are engaged in the discharge of their duties, and live under the influence of religion! However new or extraordinary such revelations, they never could have been real causes of alarm to the servants of God; and were they not at present suspended, in consequence of the completion of the intended communications of truth to mankind, piety ought rather to welcome than to dread them.
It was in line with this plan of Providence to send the highest angelic beings to announce the birth of the Messiah and to prepare the minds of Mary, his mother, the shepherds who would spread the news, and others who were more closely or distantly connected to this event through heavenly visitations. For similar reasons, it suited the nature of this extraordinary event to attach something unique and even miraculous to the birth of his precursor, whose role was to "prepare the way of the Lord" by sharing his "voice in the wilderness" and indicating to humanity the significant changes about to take place in the moral state of the world. Therefore, six months before the announcement to Mary, the angel Gabriel came down to bring "glad tidings" to Zacharias. While performing his usual duties as a priest, he had entered the temple to burn incense while the people prayed outside the holy place. Suddenly, he saw an angel standing on the right side of the altar and became very anxious until the kind spirit spoke to him in warm and congratulatory words. Ah! they have no reason to fear a message from the spirit world or to feel uneasy at the sight of beings different from those they are familiar with, who are fulfilling their duties and are guided by faith! No matter how new or extraordinary such revelations may be, they should never cause alarm for God's servants; and if they were not currently being held back due to the completion of the intended messages of truth to humanity, piety should rather embrace than fear them.
Zacharias was assured that his prayer was heard, and that his wife Elizabeth should have a son to be named John. As a sign of the accomplishment of this prediction, and as a chastisement of the doubt with which the message was at first received, he was struck with dumbness, which continued only till the birth of his child.
Zacharias was told that his prayer was heard and that his wife Elizabeth would have a son named John. As a sign of this promise being fulfilled, and to punish the doubt he initially had about the message, he became mute, a condition that lasted only until the birth of his child.
The interview between Elizabeth and Mary, the mother of our Lord, has been already adverted to in the preceding narrative, where the salutations of these favoured relatives were recited. At the expiration of the appointed time, Elizabeth bare a son whom they would have called after the name of Zacharias, but his mother interposed; and the affair being finally referred to his father, he wrote, to the general astonishment of their neighbours and relatives, who had remonstrated in vain, "His name is John." Immediately his speech was restored, and he broke out in impassioned strains of praise: "Blessed be the Lord God of Israel; for he hath visited and redeemed his people, and hath raised up an horn of salvation for us in the house of his servant David; as he spake by the mouth of his holy prophets, which have been since the world began: that we should be saved from our enemies, and from the hand of all that hate us; to perform the mercy promised to our fathers, and to remember his holy covenant; the oath which he sware to our father Abraham, that he would grant unto us, that we being delivered out of the hand of our enemies might serve him without fear, in holiness and righteousness before him, all the days of our life. And thou, child, shall be called the prophet of the Highest: for thou shall go before the face of the Lord to prepare his ways; to give knowledge of salvation unto his people by the remission of their sins, through the tender mercy of our God; whereby the day-spring from on high hath visited us, to give light to them that sit in darkness and in the shadow of death, to guide our feet into the way of peace."
The interview between Elizabeth and Mary, the mother of our Lord, was mentioned in the previous narrative, where the greetings of these favored relatives were described. When the time came, Elizabeth gave birth to a son whom they wanted to name Zacharias, but his mother objected; and the matter was ultimately referred to his father. To the surprise of their neighbors and relatives, who had argued in vain, he wrote, "His name is John." Immediately, his speech came back, and he burst into passionate praise: "Blessed be the Lord God of Israel; for He has visited and redeemed His people and has raised up a mighty Savior for us in the house of His servant David; as He spoke through the mouth of His holy prophets since the world began: that we should be saved from our enemies and from the hand of all who hate us; to fulfill the mercy promised to our fathers and to remember His holy covenant; the oath He swore to our father Abraham, to grant us that we, being rescued from the hand of our enemies, might serve Him without fear, in holiness and righteousness before Him, all the days of our life. And you, child, will be called the prophet of the Highest; for you will go before the Lord to prepare His ways; to give knowledge of salvation to His people by the forgiveness of their sins, through the tender mercy of our God; whereby the dawn from on high has visited us, to give light to those who sit in darkness and in the shadow of death, to guide our feet into the path of peace."
Reverting to the commencement of this history by the evangelist Luke, we shall be led to notice the domestic characters of Zacharias and Elizabeth, particularly as they illustrate the excellence of a life of piety. While religion adorns every station, it teaches us to fulfil every relative duty; and acting under its influence, a person becomes a light in the world, diffusing through the family, the social circle, and the more extended sphere of busy life, a mild and beneficent radiance.
Revisiting the beginning of this story as told by the evangelist Luke, we are prompted to observe the family life of Zacharias and Elizabeth, especially as they exemplify the virtues of a life devoted to faith. When religion enriches every role, it helps us to carry out each of our responsibilities to others; and by acting with this guidance, a person can shine brightly in the world, spreading a gentle and kind influence throughout the family, social circles, and the broader areas of daily life.
Our attention is first directed to the office of Zacharias, and the descent of his wife. He was a priest, and she "of the daughters of Aaron." The world affords too many evidences, that piety is neither created by station, nor hereditary in its transmission. As Zacharias was a minister of the sanctuary, it was both to be desired and expected that he should not approach the altar with a hardened and unsanctified heart. "Who shall ascend into the hill of the Lord? and who shall stand in his holy place? He that hath clean hands and a pure heart; who hath not lift up his soul unto vanity, nor sworn deceitfully. He shall receive the blessing from the Lord, and righteousness from the God of his salvation." Yet, alas! it is not always to be presumed that real religion accompanies either the brightest profession or the most dignified office! Korah, Dathan, and Abiram, offered "strange fire," Judas betrayed the Son of God, and Paul expresses an apprehension "lest, having preached to others," he should himself "be a castaway." The admonition, therefore, of God by Isaiah is appropriate and striking: "Be ye clean that bear the vessels of the Lord." It is possible to be a preacher of righteousness, and yet a child of Satan--a priest, and yet a demon--a worker of miracles, and yet a "worker of iniquity:" but a pleasing exception to this remark occurs in the history of Zacharias, who was "a priest, and righteous before God." His office and his character accorded, and the light of his example shone with unclouded brightness and attractive glory.
Our focus first shifts to the role of Zacharias and the arrival of his wife. He was a priest, and she was "from the daughters of Aaron." There are too many examples in the world that show that true piety isn't determined by one's position or inherited through family. Since Zacharias served in the sanctuary, it was both expected and desired for him to approach the altar with a sincere and sanctified heart. "Who can go up to the hill of the Lord? Who can stand in his holy place? The one with clean hands and a pure heart; who hasn’t raised their soul to falsehood or sworn deceitful oaths. They will receive blessings from the Lord and righteousness from the God of their salvation." However, it’s a sad reality that genuine faith doesn't always accompany the highest professions or most respected positions! Korah, Dathan, and Abiram offered "strange fire," Judas betrayed the Son of God, and Paul expressed concern "that after preaching to others," he might himself "be disqualified." Thus, God's warning through Isaiah is both relevant and impactful: "Be clean, you who carry the vessels of the Lord." It is possible to be a preacher of righteousness and still be a child of Satan—a priest and yet a demon—a miracle worker and still a "worker of iniquity." Yet, a positive exception to this observation can be found in Zacharias' story, as he was "a priest and righteous before God." His role and his character aligned, and the light of his example shone with clear brightness and captivating glory.
It is observable, that Elizabeth, the wife of this holy priest, was equally distinguished with himself for a sincere and active piety. "They were BOTH righteous before God;" and it was their privilege to live at that eventful moment when the clouds that obscured the past dispensations of Providence were tinged with the rising glory of the day which was just breaking upon the nations of the earth, and which lighted these pilgrims home to their eternal rest. They were some of the last of the Jewish and the first of the Christian economy, and their life seemed to form the bright line which bordered the typical ages and those of unshadowed truth and Christian revelation.
It’s clear that Elizabeth, the wife of this holy priest, was just as notable as he was for her genuine and active faith. "They were BOTH righteous before God;" and it was their privilege to live during that pivotal moment when the past actions of Providence were starting to be illuminated by the emerging glory of the new era that was dawning for the nations of the earth, guiding these pilgrims home to their eternal rest. They were among the last of the Jewish tradition and the first of the Christian faith, and their lives seemed to mark the bright line that separated the symbolic ages from those of clear truth and Christian revelation.
Zacharias and Elizabeth exhibit an attractive picture of union both natural and religious; the hymenial tie was intertwined with celestial roses, which diffused a fragrance over domestic life; their love to each other was strengthened and sanctified by their love to God.
Zacharias and Elizabeth present a beautiful example of both natural and spiritual union; their marriage was intertwined with heavenly blessings that filled their home with a wonderful fragrance. Their love for one another was deepened and made holy by their love for God.
The perfection of conjugal felicity with every good man depends upon the existence of similar religious principles and feelings with those which influence himself in the partner of his life; consequently, it will ever be his concern "to marry in the Lord." No language can express the bitterness of that pang which rends his heart when a dissimilarity of taste prevails in so important an affair. It is a worm for ever gnawing the root of his peace, and will prevent its growth even under the brightest sun of worldly prosperity. Let those especially who are forming connections in life, and who "love Christ in sincerity," reflect on the fatal consequences of devoting their affections to such as can never accompany them to the house of God but with reluctance, or to the throne of grace but with weariness and aversion. If the object of your fondest regard be an unbeliever, what a cloud will darken your serenest days, what unutterable grief disturb your otherwise peaceful sabbaths! Your pleasures and your pains of a religious kind, which are the most intense, will be equally unparticipated. You must walk alone in those ways of pleasantness which would be still more endeared by such sweet society; and you must suffer the keenest sorrows of the heart--perhaps without daring to name them, and certainly without one tear, one word, one look of soothing sympathy. How could you endure it that the very wife of your bosom should manifest the temper of those assassins that murdered your Lord, while in the exercise of a lively faith you hailed him as "the chief among ten thousand, and altogether lovely?" Would it not agonize your heart that she should be indifferent only, not to say inimical, towards him in whom you daily "rejoice with joy unspeakable and full of glory?"
The ultimate happiness in marriage with a good partner relies on sharing similar religious beliefs and feelings that influence each other; therefore, it’s always important to "marry in the Lord." No words can capture the pain that tears at your heart when there’s a mismatch in such a significant matter. It’s a constant worry that eats away at your peace, even when everything else in life is going well. Those who are building relationships and truly "love Christ" should think carefully about the serious consequences of giving their hearts to someone who will only accompany them to church with reluctance, or approach God with fatigue and distaste. If the one you care for the most is an unbeliever, just imagine how a shadow will loom over your happiest days and how deep sorrow will disrupt your peaceful weekends! The joys and sorrows that are the most profound in your faith will remain unshared. You will travel those paths of joy alone, which would be even more cherished with such cherished company; and you will endure the sharpest heartaches—perhaps without being able to speak of them, and certainly without a tear, a word, or a glance of comforting understanding. How could you bear that the very wife you love could show a spirit like those who turned against your Savior, while you hold him dear as "the chief among ten thousand, and altogether lovely?" Wouldn’t it break your heart that she could be indifferent at best, if not outright hostile, towards the one in whom you find daily "joy unspeakable and full of glory?"
In proportion to the wretchedness of such circumstances must be the felicity of the reverse, of which this narrative furnishes a pleasing exemplification. Zacharias and Elizabeth were both righteous, and this union of spirit diffused a holy and gladdening radiance over all the scenes of life. In the family, in the social circle, in the house of God, they were ONE. Together they could bow the knee at the throne of grace, together go up to the temple! The grief or the joy of one was the grief or the joy of both; they could sing the same song, unite in the same prayer, feast on the same spiritual food! This was the perfection of love--this was the triumph of friendship! No contrary current of feeling on either side ruffled the pure stream of domestic and religious pleasure, but it flowed along in a clear, noiseless, and perpetual course. In this case the language of David might be applied with emphatic propriety: "Behold, how good and pleasant a thing it is to dwell together in unity."
In proportion to how miserable such circumstances are, the happiness of the opposite must also be significant, which this story beautifully illustrates. Zacharias and Elizabeth were both righteous, and this unity of spirit spread a holy and uplifting light over all aspects of life. In the family, in social gatherings, in the house of God, they were ONE. Together, they could kneel at the throne of grace and go to the temple! The sorrow or joy of one was the sorrow or joy of both; they could sing the same song, join in the same prayer, and share the same spiritual nourishment! This was the pinnacle of love—this was the victory of friendship! No conflicting feelings on either side disturbed the pure flow of their domestic and spiritual joy, but it ran smoothly, quietly, and continuously. In this case, the words of David could be aptly applied: "Behold, how good and pleasant it is to dwell together in unity."
Elizabeth and her partner were "both well stricken in years." There is something venerable in hoary age, especially when adorned with the graces of the Spirit. The mind reposes with peculiar complacency on those who, having long "adorned the doctrines of God their Saviour in all things," are waiting quietly and confidently for their admission to heaven. They can see the shadows of the evening deepen upon them without a sigh; and while death is unlocking the doors of their appointed house, can sing, "Thanks be to God, that giveth us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ." While the mind of a wicked man, in the near prospect of dissolution, is filled with distraction, and "a fearful looking for of judgment--while his
Elizabeth and her partner were "both advanced in years." There’s something respectable about old age, especially when it’s accompanied by spiritual grace. People find a special comfort in those who have long "lived according to the teachings of God their Savior in all things," as they wait calmly and confidently for their entry into heaven. They can see the shadows of the evening closing in on them without a sigh; and while death is opening the doors to their final resting place, they can sing, "Thanks be to God, who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ." Meanwhile, the mind of a wicked person, when facing the end, is filled with turmoil and "a fearful anticipation of judgment—while his
"------frantic soul
Raves round the walls of her clay tenement,
Flies to each avenue, and cries for help--
But cries in vain;------"
"------frantic soul
Raves around the walls of her clay apartment,
Flies to every street, and screams for help--
But screams in vain;------"
conscious that he is the enemy of God, the abhorrence of saints; the confederate, and will soon become the companion, of evil spirits; the dying Christian looks beyond the confines of mortality into the eternal world, without one sensation but that "of a desire to depart and to be with Christ." In quitting the present world, he expects a transition from sorrow to joy--from the region of shadows to that of realities--from the habitations of sin to the abodes of purity. Embracing Jesus by faith, he exclaims with Simeon, "Now lettest thou thy servant depart in peace, for mine eyes have seen thy salvation;" or with Paul, "I have fought a good fight, I have finished my course, I have kept the faith: henceforth is laid up for me a crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous Judge, shall give me in that day."
Aware that he is an enemy of God, detested by the saints; an accomplice, destined to soon become a companion of evil spirits; the dying Christian looks beyond this life into eternity, feeling only "a desire to depart and to be with Christ." As he leaves this world, he anticipates a shift from sorrow to joy—moving from the shadows to the light, from a life of sin to one of purity. Embracing Jesus through faith, he joyfully declares with Simeon, "Now you let your servant go in peace, for my eyes have seen your salvation;" or with Paul, "I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith: now there is in store for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous Judge, will award to me on that day."
It is pleasing to see the youthful mind impressed with the concerns of religion, devoting its powers to the Saviour, and despising the solicitations of sinful pleasure; but ah! how many cloudless mornings are succeeded by gloomy days--how many false and fruitless blossoms adorn the smiling spring--how many seeds spring up, but perish because they have "no depth of earth!" Early piety, therefore, however gratifying, cannot be contemplated without anxiety, if not suspicion; the force of temptation has not yet been endured--the world has not half exhausted its quiver of poisoned arrows--Satan has not yet tried all his arts and machinations--the race is not yet run!--but in those who, like Zacharias and Elizabeth, are "well striken in years," we witness the stability of principle, the triumph of perseverance, and the reign of grace. Dear and venerable companions in the ways of God, ye have borne the burden and heat of the day! Like a shock of corn, ye shall soon be "gathered in your season;" ye shall soon drop the infirmities of humanity, and be clothed in the robes of light! "Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city."
It’s great to see a young mind engaged with religious matters, dedicating its energy to the Savior and rejecting the temptations of sinful pleasures. But oh! how many bright mornings give way to dark days—how many false and unfruitful blooms appear in the cheerful spring—how many seeds sprout but die because they have “no depth of earth!” Therefore, while early faith is encouraging, it can’t be viewed without some worry, if not suspicion; the weight of temptation hasn’t been faced yet—the world hasn’t come close to using up its supply of poisoned arrows—Satan hasn't deployed all his tricks and schemes—the race isn’t finished yet! Yet in those who, like Zacharias and Elizabeth, are "well stricken in years," we see steadfastness in belief, the victory of persistence, and the reign of grace. Dear and respected companions on the path of God, you have carried the burden and stress of the day! Like a harvest of grain, you will soon be "gathered in your season;" you will soon shed the weaknesses of humanity and be clothed in garments of light! "Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city."
The brief, but comprehensive notice of these venerable saints, in the commencement of the Gospel according to Luke, exhibits at once the characteristic features of their piety.
The short but thorough introduction to these revered saints at the beginning of the Gospel of Luke shows the key aspects of their devotion.
1. It was of a quality approved by God himself: for they are represented as "righteous before God," that is, in the divine estimation. It is this only which can determine our genuine character; for, however "outwardly virtuous before men," the internal spirit and character may be marked by moral deformities which the eye of Omniscience cannot but view with detestation. The most eminent Christians, indeed, are aware that perfection in righteousness is not attainable in the present state, and that when "weighed in the balances," they are in many respects "found wanting:" but while they look for acceptance through the righteousness of Christ, instead of "going about to establish their own," they possess a rectitude of principle, though the degree of holiness be imperfect. They are sincere, habitual in their aim to please God, cherishing a supreme attachment to his name and character, and determined in their resistance of every influence that would seduce them from his service or impel them to commit sin.
1. It had a quality that was approved by God himself: for they are described as "righteous before God," meaning in the divine view. This is the only thing that can determine our true character; because, no matter how "outwardly virtuous before men," the inner spirit and character may be filled with moral flaws that the eye of Omniscience cannot help but see with disgust. The most prominent Christians are aware that achieving perfection in righteousness isn't possible in this life, and that when "weighed in the balances," they are often "found wanting:" but while they seek acceptance through the righteousness of Christ, instead of "trying to establish their own," they maintain a strong sense of principle, even if the degree of holiness is imperfect. They are sincere, consistently aiming to please God, valuing his name and character above all, and committed to resisting any influence that might tempt them away from his service or lead them to sin.
2. Elizabeth and her venerable partner regulated their conduct by divine authority, irrespective of the opinions of men. They are said to "have walked in the commandments and ordinances of the Lord." The Jews were accustomed to blend the traditions of the elders with their religious services; but these believers consulted and obeyed the oracles of Heaven. They repaired at once to the spring-head of wisdom, deriving their faith and obtaining direction with regard to their practice from Him who alone possesses the authority of a master.
2. Elizabeth and her esteemed partner guided their actions by divine authority, regardless of what others thought. They are said to "have walked in the commandments and ordinances of the Lord." The Jews often mixed the traditions of the elders with their religious practices; however, these believers looked to and followed the teachings of Heaven. They went straight to the source of wisdom, drawing their faith and seeking guidance for their actions from Him who alone has the authority of a master.
This was a very decisive evidence of their religion, and is a test which is capable of being applied to every case and to every sphere of life. If the only certain evidence of true piety consisted in becoming martyrs, few could have an opportunity of evincing it, through not being called to this high and holy service; or, if the test were the distribution of ample charities, or self-devotement to the labour of the Christian ministry, the poor, and the ungifted, and ineloquent, would be excluded from the prescribed means of testifying their love to God: but obedience to his commands may be practised in the humblest circumstances, in the lowliest station, and by the most obscure individual. Any where and every where it is possible "to take up our cross," to "deny ourselves," to "mortify the flesh," to "walk in the Spirit."
This was very clear evidence of their faith and is a test that can be applied to every situation and area of life. If the only true sign of genuine faith was becoming a martyr, few would have the chance to show it, since not everyone is called to that noble and sacred duty. Likewise, if the test was about giving generously or dedicating oneself to ministry, then the poor, untalented, and inarticulate would be left out of the required ways to demonstrate their love for God. However, obedience to His commands can be practiced in the simplest situations, in the most humble positions, and by the most unnoticed individuals. Anywhere and everywhere, it is possible to "take up our cross," to "deny ourselves," to "mortify the flesh," and to "walk in the Spirit."
3. The obedience of Elizabeth and Zacharias was universal--not partial or restricted; for they "walked in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord."
3. The obedience of Elizabeth and Zacharias was complete—not limited or selective; for they "walked in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord."
An insincere profession will be distinguished by partiality in its observances. It will practise some duties and reject others, believe some doctrines and hesitate to admit others. Influenced by many subordinate considerations, it will select those requirements which are most easily performed, most calculated to attract public attention, or most conformable to natural prepossessions. It will dispense with some things as difficult, and with others as unnecessary or unimportant. "Then," exclaimed the Psalmist, "shall I not be ashamed when I have respect unto all thy commandments."
An insincere commitment will be marked by bias in its practices. It will follow some obligations and ignore others, accept some beliefs and hesitate to embrace others. Driven by various lesser concerns, it will choose the requirements that are easiest to fulfill, most likely to capture public interest, or most aligned with personal biases. It will overlook some things as too challenging and others as unnecessary or insignificant. "Then," exclaimed the Psalmist, "will I not be ashamed when I regard all your commandments."
4. Elizabeth and her aged companion were distinguished also for a piety which was blameless. It is possible to merit blame even in our very acts of religious obedience. How seldom do we attain that purity of motive, that unostentatious simplicity of manner, that uniformity of conduct, which constitute a blameless piety! In this respect we have daily reason, at the footstool of mercy, to deplore our deficiency, our lanquor, our lukewarmness of spirit, our unprofitableness and vileness. "If thou, Lord, wert strict to mark iniquity, O Lord, who could stand?" There is not a prayer we utter but would be rejected, were it not for the prevalence of the Redeemer's intercession, nor a service we perform, but is so defiled with guilt that it would be an abominable offering, but for the efficacy of that blood which "cleanseth us from all sin." Nor, indeed, was the piety of Zacharias and Elizabeth in itself "blameless," irrespective of this atonement; nor were they "righteous," but as accepted and justified "through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus." To a lively faith they, however, united a holy conversation, and an habitual obedience: their life was a perpetual sacrifice to God, and diffused around a sweet savour of piety.
4. Elizabeth and her elderly companion were also known for a piety that was blameless. It's possible to deserve blame even in our acts of religious obedience. How rarely do we achieve that purity of motive, that humble simplicity of manner, that consistency of conduct, which make up a blameless piety! In this regard, we have daily reason, at the foot of mercy, to mourn our shortcomings, our weariness, our lukewarmness of spirit, our unproductiveness, and our sinfulness. "If you, Lord, kept a record of sins, O Lord, who could stand?" There isn't a prayer we say that wouldn't be rejected if it weren't for the power of the Redeemer's intercession, nor a service we perform that isn't tainted with guilt, making it an unacceptable offering, but for the effectiveness of that blood which "cleanses us from all sin." Furthermore, the piety of Zacharias and Elizabeth wasn't inherently "blameless" without this atonement; they weren't "righteous" except as accepted and justified "through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus." However, they combined a lively faith with a holy lifestyle and consistent obedience: their lives were a continuous sacrifice to God and spread a sweet aroma of piety around them.
Let us contemplate the happiness of such a life. It is common to represent religion as incompatible with true enjoyment, and to describe those who are under its influence as gloomy fanatics, dragging out a miserable existence--the dupes of prejudice and the slaves of melancholy. If a perpetual sense of the divine presence, a well-founded confidence of pardoned sin, free access to the throne of mercy, abundant communications of spiritual good and lively anticipations of a felicity beyond the grave, commensurate with the capacities of an immortal spirit, and with the everlasting ages of eternity; if these produce wretchedness, then, and in no other case, is religion a source of misery. Be not deceived; such allegations result from ignorance and depravity. Zacharias and Elizabeth, joined together by the dear bonds of mutual affection, and the still dearer ties of grace, present a picture of happiness unrivalled in the gay and thoughtless world. We appeal to them, and to those who resemble them, as "epistles" of God, that teach the efficacy of genuine religion. Read them, ye profane, and blush for your impieties! Read them, ye sons and daughters of strife, and banish discord from your houses! Read them, ye fearful, hesitating, lukewarm professors, and learn to walk in "all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord!" Read them, ye worldly wise, ye ambitious, ye "lovers of pleasure," and confess ye have mistaken the true means to happiness, and have "forsaken your own mercies!"
Let’s think about the happiness of such a life. It's common to portray religion as being at odds with real joy and to describe those influenced by it as gloomy fanatics who live miserable lives—victims of prejudice and slaves to sadness. If a constant awareness of the divine presence, true confidence in forgiven sin, open access to mercy, rich experiences of spiritual blessings, and vibrant hopes for happiness beyond this life—suited for an immortal soul and the endless ages of eternity—bring misery, then, and only then, is religion a source of suffering. Don’t be fooled; such claims come from ignorance and moral decay. Zacharias and Elizabeth, bonded by deep love and even stronger ties of grace, offer an unparalleled example of happiness in a superficial world. We point to them, along with those like them, as "letters" from God that demonstrate the power of genuine faith. Read about them, you irreverent ones, and feel ashamed for your wrongdoing! Read about them, you quarrelsome ones, and get rid of discord in your homes! Read about them, you fearful, indecisive, and lukewarm believers, and learn to live by "all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord!" Read about them, you worldly-wise, you ambitious, you "lovers of pleasure," and admit that you've misunderstood the true path to happiness and have "forsaken your own mercies!"
It is a supereminent excellence of the religion of Jesus, that "the peace and joy in believing" which it inspires do not depend on external circumstances. As no worldly condition can create, so neither can it destroy the Christian's felicity; it is firm and immoveable amidst the changes and revolutions of human affairs--in the bright or cloudy day. Like the mariner's compass, which continually points in the same direction amidst changing seasons and varying climes, the most extraordinary vicissitudes of the "present evil world," cannot "move" the mind of a believer from the "hope of the Gospel."
It is a remarkable quality of the religion of Jesus that the "peace and joy in believing" it brings do not rely on external circumstances. Just as no worldly condition can create, neither can it destroy a Christian's happiness; it remains steady and unshakeable amidst the ups and downs of life—whether it's a bright day or a cloudy one. Like a mariner's compass that consistently points in the same direction through changing seasons and various climates, the most significant changes in this "present evil world" cannot "move" a believer's mind away from the "hope of the Gospel."
Reflect further, on the effect which such a life is calculated to produce on others.
Reflect further on the impact that such a life is likely to have on others.
A holy life is a powerful argument for the "truth as it is in Jesus;" and that suspicious eagerness with which the wicked watch the conduct of professors, that patient malignity with which they wait for their halting, and that Satanic joy with which they exult over their misconduct, prove their own convictions of the strength of such an argument. Let us then be concerned to falsify their predictions and disappoint their enmity by "walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless." Consider the impressive appeal of the apostle: "Only let your conversation be as becometh the gospel of Christ." Shine, ye professing Christians, for "ye are the lights of the world"--shine with a holy and steady radiance in the church of God, and pray for daily supplies of the oil of grace, that your light may not degenerate into a feeble glimmering or totally expire; otherwise you may become accessary to the fall and ruin of others, and "their blood may be upon you!" Such a pious union, such holy friendship as that of Elizabeth and Zacharias, will be perpetuated through infinite ages. It is not a transient but an everlasting union; it shall survive the grave and defy the stroke of mortality. They who "sleep in Jesus" will God bring with him. The sepulchre, to such as die in the faith of Christ and in a state of holy friendship with each other, only resembles a vast prison, in which dearest friends are separated only for a time in different cells, and from which they shall be released when the gloomy keeper resigns his keys, when "death is swallowed up in victory." Those humble and affectionate disciples who have "walked together in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord, here, shall take sweet counsel above, and walk together in the fields of immortality." In a nobler sense than the original application of the words, it may be said of all Christian friends, "they were lovely and pleasant in their lives, and in their deaths they were not divided."
A holy life is a strong argument for the "truth as it is in Jesus;" and that suspicious eagerness with which the wicked watch the behavior of believers, that persistent malice with which they wait for their missteps, and that devilish joy with which they revel in their failures, all show their own beliefs about how powerful such an argument is. So, let’s make it our mission to prove them wrong and frustrate their hatred by "walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless." Think about the compelling call from the apostle: "Only let your conversation be as befits the gospel of Christ." Shine, you professing Christians, for "you are the lights of the world"—shine with a holy and steady glow in the church of God, and pray for daily supplies of the oil of grace, so your light doesn’t fade into a weak flicker or completely go out; otherwise, you might contribute to the fall and ruin of others, and "their blood may be upon you!" Such a pious bond, such holy friendship like that of Elizabeth and Zacharias, will be perpetuated through infinite ages. It’s not a temporary but an everlasting bond; it will outlast the grave and defy death. Those who "sleep in Jesus" will God bring with him. The grave, for those who die in the faith of Christ and in a state of holy friendship with each other, is like a vast prison, where dear friends are separated only for a time in different cells, and from which they will be freed when the gloomy keeper hands over his keys, when "death is swallowed up in victory." Those humble and loving disciples who have "walked together in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord here, will take sweet counsel above, and walk together in the fields of immortality." In a more profound sense than originally intended, it can be said of all Christian friends, "they were lovely and pleasant in their lives, and in their deaths they were not divided."
This perpetuation of Christian society and love, is intimated in the most striking manner by our Redeemer when on the point of departure from his disciples, whom he called his "friends." "I will not henceforth drink of this fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father's kingdom." Who can describe the joys of that "marriage-feast," the felicities of that endeared spiritual and eternal intercourse, that union of hearts, that concourse of affections, that flow and mingling of souls! These are some of "the mysteries of godliness"--this is what "eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, nor hath it entered into the heart of man to conceive."
This ongoing existence of Christian community and love is signified in a powerful way by our Savior when He was about to leave His disciples, whom He referred to as His "friends." "I won't drink from this vine again until the day I drink it new with you in my Father's kingdom." Who can express the joy of that "wedding feast," the happiness of that cherished spiritual and eternal connection, that bond of hearts, that gathering of emotions, that blending of souls? These are some of "the mysteries of godliness"—this is what "eye has not seen, nor ear heard, nor has it entered into the heart of man to conceive."
Let these glorious expectations revive our failing courage amidst the conflicts of life. Let us not despair, though we may weep over the companions of our pilgrimage, slain at our side by the irresistible stroke of death. The separation is transitory--the reunion will be eternal. "But I would not have you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning them which are asleep, that ye sorrow not even as others which have no hope. For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him. For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive, and remain unto the coming of the Lord, shall not prevent them which are asleep. For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: then we which are alive and remain, shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. Wherefore comfort one another with these words."
Let these hopeful expectations boost our fading courage amidst life's struggles. Let's not lose hope, even if we mourn for the companions on our journey, taken from us by the unavoidable hand of death. This separation is temporary—the reunion will be everlasting. "But I don’t want you to be uninformed, brothers, about those who have died, so you won’t grieve like the rest who have no hope. For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, then we believe that God will bring with Jesus those who have died in Him. We tell you this based on the Lord’s own words: we who are still alive at the Lord’s coming will not be at a disadvantage to those who have died. For the Lord himself will come down from heaven with a commanding shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trumpet call of God; and the dead in Christ will rise first. After that, we who are still alive and remain will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we will be with the Lord forever. Therefore, encourage one another with these words."
Such as are opposite in character to Zacharias and Elizabeth, and who are "walking in none of the commandments and ordinances of the Lord," should reflect on the misery of their condition, as utterly destitute of all those hopes and privileges which have been described. Who instituted these ordinances?--who gave these commandments?--whose authority is it you dare despise?--or who has released you from your obligations to this authority?--what madness induces you to fly in the face of God--to measure your power against the sword of Omnipotence? O, remember--"the wages of sin is death!"
Those who are completely different from Zacharias and Elizabeth, and who are "not following any of the commandments and rules of the Lord," should think about the misery of their situation, being completely lacking in all the hopes and privileges that have been described. Who set up these rules? -- who gave these commandments? -- whose authority are you daring to disrespect? -- or who has freed you from your responsibilities to this authority? -- what madness drives you to challenge God -- to pit your strength against the power of the Almighty? O, remember -- "the wages of sin is death!"
Anna.
Chapter III.
Introduction of Anna into the sacred Story--inspired Description of her--the aged apt to be unduly attached to Life--Anna probably Religious at an early Period--Religion the most substantial Support amidst the Infirmities of Age--the most effectual Guard against its Vices--and the best Preparation for its End.
Introduction of Anna into the sacred Story—an inspired Description of her—older individuals often become overly attached to Life—Anna likely had a religious background from a young age—Religion provides the strongest support during the challenges of aging—it's the most effective protection against its vices—and the best preparation for its inevitable end.
Two illustrious women have already been presented to the reader as adorning the era of our Saviour's incarnation; the one, the mother of his humanity, the witness of his miracles, and the weeping attendant upon his crucifixion; the other, her venerable relative, the wife of Zacharias, and the parent of John, who was the destined precursor of the "Desire of all nations." We are now to contemplate another female, whose age superadds a charm to her excellences, and whose privilege also it was to witness the commencing brightness of the evangelical day. Like Elizabeth, her "memorial" is short, but it does not "perish with her." She has a place in the chronicles of the redeemed, a name before which that of heroes and heroines fades away, and which it requires no "storied urn nor animated burst" to perpetuate.
Two remarkable women have already been introduced to the reader as part of the time when our Savior was born; one is the mother of his humanity, a witness to his miracles, and the grieving figure at his crucifixion; the other is her esteemed relative, the wife of Zacharias, and the mother of John, who was meant to be the forerunner of the "Desire of all nations." We are now going to consider another woman, whose age adds a special charm to her qualities, and who also had the privilege to see the dawn of the evangelical age. Like Elizabeth, her "memorial" is brief, but it will not "perish with her." She holds a place in the stories of the redeemed, a name that makes the names of heroes and heroines fade, and it doesn’t need any "storied urn nor animated burst" to keep it alive.
Anna is introduced to our notice on the memorable occasion which has been already mentioned, when the parents of Jesus took him after his circumcision to Jerusalem, to "present him to the Lord." Then it was that Simeon broke forth in eloquent and prophetic congratulations, expressive at once of his own triumph over death, in consequence of having witnessed the accomplishment of those prophecies which had so long and so often filled him with delightful anticipations, and of the "glory" which he foresaw would irradiate Israel and enlighten the Gentiles. Scarcely had he finished his address, when Anna, a prophetess, remarkable for her extreme age and exemplary piety, entered the temple, and not only united with Simeon and the rest of the interesting group in "giving thanks unto the Lord," but "spake of him to all them that looked for redemption in Jerusalem."
Anna first catches our attention during the memorable event already mentioned, when Jesus' parents took him to Jerusalem after his circumcision to "present him to the Lord." It was then that Simeon expressed his heartfelt and prophetic congratulations, highlighting his own victory over death, having seen the realization of the prophecies that had long filled him with joyful expectations, as well as the "glory" he envisioned would shine on Israel and enlighten the Gentiles. As soon as he finished speaking, Anna, a prophetess known for her advanced age and deep faith, entered the temple. She joined Simeon and the rest of the captivated group in "giving thanks unto the Lord," and began to "speak of him to all those who were waiting for redemption in Jerusalem."
It was benefiting the majesty of the event which had occurred, that the spirit of prophecy should revive after being dormant for about four hundred years. Since the days of Malachi no such inspiration had been afforded; but the new and glorious period commencing with the incarnation was marked by this as well as other signs and wonders. When Simeon held the infant Saviour in his arms, the Spirit of God touched his tongue with a live coal from the altar; and when the aged "daughter of Phanuel" approached, she caught the glow of kindling rapture, and blended with his her praises and predictions. This eminent woman is represented as "of a great age," as having "lived with a husband seven years from her virginity," and as being "a widow of about four-score and four years, which departed not from the temple, but served God with fastings and prayers night and day." This form of expression does not seem to furnish decisive evidence whether her entire age was eighty-four, or whether she was a widow during that period; if the latter, the seven years in which she had lived with a husband, together with the probable number which constituted her age at the time of her marriage, must be added to the calculation, which would produce considerably more than a hundred years; in either case she must be allowed to occupy a conspicuous place in the records of longevity.
It enhanced the significance of the event that the spirit of prophecy should awaken after being silent for about four hundred years. Since Malachi’s time, no such inspiration had been given; but this new and glorious period, beginning with the incarnation, was marked by this and other signs and wonders. When Simeon held the infant Savior in his arms, the Spirit of God touched his tongue with a burning coal from the altar; and when the elderly "daughter of Phanuel" approached, she caught the spark of excitement and joined him with her praises and predictions. This remarkable woman is described as "very old," having "lived with a husband for seven years after her virginity," and as "a widow of about eighty-four years, who did not leave the temple, but worshiped God with fasting and prayers night and day." This wording doesn’t clearly indicate whether her total age was eighty-four, or if she was a widow for that length of time; if it was the latter, then the seven years she spent with her husband, plus the likely number of years she was married before that, would add to her age, resulting in considerably more than a hundred years; in either case, she deserves a prominent place in the records of longevity.
It has been observed of the aged, that although existence, when extended beyond the usual period of "threescore years and ten," is nothing "but labour and sorrow," they still adhere to life with the utmost tenacity, and are even less disposed to relinquish it than those whose more vigorous powers and undecayed youth capacitate them for its enjoyment. But however surprised we may be to witness this anxiety to live in those who are bending beneath the pressure of years and the load of decrepitude, and to see that this anxiety rather increases than diminishes, there is something in it by no means unnatural. In addition to the love of life which is implanted in every human bosom for the wisest purposes, the aged person cannot but feel that he is nearer than others to that hour of separation from all the connexions and interests of time than the multitude around him--an hour at which nature instinctively shudders, and which is always regarded as painful, whatever may be the result. Corporeal suffering may be considerable; and that change of being which the mortal stroke produces has always something about it awful, mysterious, and terrific. There are few instances in which it can be approached without some degree of dread, some shrinking of mind, whatever be the state of detachment from the present world, and whatever pleasing anticipations may exist with regard to another: as the patient, however assured of the necessity of the measure and the importance of the result, trembles while preparations are making to amputate his disordered limb. It may be observed also of the young, that while they compassionate their aged friends as the prey of a thousand imbecilities both of body and mind, and lament over a state in which man is reduced to a second childhood, there is scarcely an individual who does not harbour in secret the wish to attain an age equal at least, if not superior, to any of his cotemporaries. The reason is similar to that which influences persons at an advanced period of life; the thought of death, with all its concomitant evils, is unwelcome at any time, and consequently it is grateful to the mind to place it at the greatest conceivable distance; so that, were it now within the appointments of Providence or the bounds of probability, little doubt can be entertained that the great proportion of mankind would readily accept as a blessing a patriarchal or antediluvian age.
It has been noted that older people, even though living beyond the typical lifespan of "seventy years" is often "just hard work and sadness," still cling to life with great determination and are even less willing to let go of it than those whose youthful vitality enables them to enjoy life. But as surprising as it may be to see this desire to live in those who are weighed down by age and frailty, and to notice that this desire tends to grow rather than fade, there’s nothing unnatural about it. Besides the inherent love of life that everyone has, especially for wise reasons, older individuals can’t help but realize that they are closer to their final departure from all the connections and interests of this world than the majority around them—an event that nature instinctively fears and is always considered painful, no matter the outcome. Physical suffering can be significant, and the transformation that death causes is always somewhat dreadful, mysterious, and terrifying. Few people face it without some fear, some reluctance, regardless of their detachment from this life, and whatever positive expectations they may have about what comes next: like a patient, even when convinced of the need for surgery and aware of its importance, will still feel anxious during the preparations to amputate a troubled limb. It's also worth mentioning about the young that while they sympathize with their older friends as being burdened by countless weaknesses of both body and mind, and mourn a state that resembles a second childhood, almost no one secretly doesn’t wish to live at least as long, if not longer, than their peers. The reasoning is much the same as that for those later in life; the thought of death, along with all its associated troubles, is unwelcome at any time, so it’s comforting to push it as far away as possible. Therefore, if it were within the plans of fate or even remotely plausible, there’s little doubt that most people would gladly regard the chance to live to an extreme old age as a blessing.
Anna is particularly noticed as the daughter of Phanuel, of whom we have no other information; and as belonging to the tribe of Asher, which was situated in Galilee. This, whether recorded for that purpose or not, might serve to refute the charge, that "out of Galilee ariseth no prophet," since from that quarter proceeded the very first inspirations upon the revival of the prophetic spirit. Asher was a very inferior tribe, and one of the ten carried captive by the Assyrians, having departed from the worship of the true God, and from the house of David, under Jeroboam. But notwithstanding this general defection, there were individuals who returned and reunited themselves with Judah, that they might enjoy the ancient privileges of the people of God. Thus even in the worst of times, and amidst the least favourable circumstances, some portion of true religion has always been preserved in the earth. Though the watchful eye of Providence has occasionally suffered the flame of devotion to languish and almost expire, yet its total extinction has been prevented, and unexpected coincidences have frequently excited it into new and more vigorous action.
Anna is particularly noted as the daughter of Phanuel, about whom we have no other information, and as a member of the tribe of Asher, which was located in Galilee. This detail, whether it was recorded for that purpose or not, might counter the claim that "no prophet comes from Galilee," since that region was where the first inspirations emerged during the revival of the prophetic spirit. Asher was a lesser tribe and one of the ten taken captive by the Assyrians, having turned away from the worship of the true God and the house of David under Jeroboam. However, despite this widespread defection, some individuals returned and rejoined Judah to enjoy the ancient privileges of God's people. So, even in the worst times and under the least favorable conditions, some aspect of true religion has always been maintained in the world. Though the vigilant eye of Providence has occasionally allowed the flame of devotion to dim and nearly go out, its complete extinction has been prevented, and unexpected events have often rekindled it into new and more vigorous action.
We have in the history before us a specimen of a pious old age, remarkable in itself, and calculated to suggest a variety of useful considerations. This holy woman probably lodged in the immediate vicinity, if not in some of the outward apartments of the temple, which gave her an opportunity of indulging in those constant devotions which accorded with her wishes and comported with her age. On every occasion she was present at appointed services, and so entire was her self-devotement to religion, that she was incessantly engaged in fasting and prayers. The world had no claims upon her, being alike unfitted for any of its avocations and indisposed to any of its pleasures: she had bid it a final farewell, and had withdrawn behind the scenes of this vast theatre, which are so artfully painted as to allure and deceive the imaginations of mankind, into the secrecy of devotion and the sanctuary of her God. Peace was the companion of her retirement, and piety shed its serenest ray upon the evening of her mortal existence.
We have before us an example of a devout old age, noteworthy in itself and prompting a range of valuable thoughts. This holy woman likely lived nearby, if not in some of the outer rooms of the temple, which allowed her to engage in the regular prayers that suited her desires and her age. She attended all the scheduled services, and her commitment to her faith was so complete that she was constantly involved in fasting and prayer. The world held no appeal for her, as she was equally unfit for its activities and uninterested in its pleasures: she had said a final goodbye to it and had retreated behind the scenes of this grand stage, which is so skillfully decorated to entice and mislead people's imaginations, into the quiet of devotion and the sanctuary of her God. Peace accompanied her solitude, and piety cast its brightest light on the twilight of her life.
It may be presumed that the religion of Anna was by no means of recent date, but that the seeds of so rich a harvest were sown "in the fields of youth." Whatever is great or eminent is usually the work of time. Nature does not produce the oak, with its spreading branches and solid trunk, in a day or a twelve month; and, in general, a rapid luxuriancy is connected with corresponding weakness and quick decay. The plans of Providence require the lapse of years or ages to accomplish: events of importance seldom burst suddenly upon the world, and without a previous course of preparatory dispensations, tending to point out the purposes of such occurrences, and to awaken human expectations. Nor can excellence of character be formed without the use of means, opportunities of progressive improvement, and that experience which must be slowly gained.
It can be assumed that Anna's religion was not something new, but rather that the foundations for such a rich outcome were laid "in the fields of youth." Anything truly great or significant usually takes time to develop. Nature doesn’t grow an oak tree, with its wide branches and sturdy trunk, overnight or in a year; generally, rapid growth is associated with fragility and quick decline. The plans of Providence take years or even ages to unfold: significant events rarely happen suddenly and usually follow a series of preparatory circumstances that reveal the intentions behind them and build human anticipation. Likewise, excellence of character cannot be achieved without the right means, opportunities for gradual improvement, and the kind of experience that can only be gained over time.
Far be it from us to limit the operations of divine grace: it can, indeed, and in some instances has, produced effects of a nature to which no general rules and principles are applicable: it has instantaneously converted a furious persecutor into a faithful, laborious, and eminent preacher of "the faith which once he destroyed;" it has transformed a malefactor into a saint, and in one hour raised the criminal from the depths of infamy and the agonies of crucifixion to the dignity of a believer in Christ and the joys of paradise. But these surely ought not to be regarded as the ordinary methods of its operation, but rather as miraculous interferences. In general, religious ordinances are to be constantly and perseveringly attended, in order to the acquisition of eminence in religion: holy vigilance must concur with devout and fervent prayer, day by day, to check and finally vanquish the power of depravity, to elevate the mind above the world, and prepare the Christian for his future bliss; as the child must commonly be "trained up in the way he should go," if we hope that "when he is old he will not depart from it." Impressions deepen and acquire the force of principles by degrees, knowledge is obtained by perpetual accumulation, and faith is increased by constant exercise. It would be as vain to look for the wrinkles of age in the face of youth, or the strength of maturity in the arm of an infant, as to expect the experience which can only result from the witness of changes and the operation of circumstances, with its corresponding stability of character, in him who has but just commenced a life of piety. As "the husbandman waiteth for the precious fruits of the earth, and hath long patience for it until he receive the early and the latter rain," so we must in general look for a slow and gradual formation of the character to eminence and spiritual luxuriancy. The account given of Anna would therefore lead us to infer that she had been many years, and in all probability from her youth, devoted to the service of God.
It's not our place to restrict the workings of divine grace: it can, and in some cases has, created effects that can't be explained by general rules and principles. It has instantly turned a fierce persecutor into a dedicated, hardworking, and notable preacher of "the faith he once destroyed." It has changed a criminal into a saint, elevating someone from the depths of shame and the suffering of crucifixion to the status of a believer in Christ and the joys of paradise in just one hour. However, these should not be seen as the usual ways it operates, but rather as miraculous interventions. Generally, religious practices should be regularly and persistently followed if one aims to achieve greatness in faith: holy vigilance must go hand in hand with sincere and passionate prayer every day to confront and ultimately overcome the power of wickedness, to raise the mind above worldly distractions, and to prepare the Christian for their future joy; just as a child must typically be "trained up in the way he should go" if we hope that "when he is old, he will not depart from it." Impressions gradually deepen and become foundational principles, knowledge grows through constant accumulation, and faith is strengthened through regular practice. It would be as pointless to expect the wrinkles of age on a young person's face or the strength of maturity in an infant's arm as to anticipate the experience that can only come from witnessing changes and circumstances, along with the resulting stability of character, in someone who has just begun a life of devotion. Just as "the farmer waits for the precious fruits of the earth, and has long patience for it until he receives the early and the latter rain," we should generally expect a slow and gradual development of character toward greatness and spiritual richness. The account of Anna suggests that she had been committed to God's service for many years, likely since her youth.
She had not to regret that her best days were spent in riot and dissipation, in opposition or indifference to religion, by which so many debase their nature, offend their Maker, and ruin their souls: but while she contemplated the future without alarm, and perhaps with joy, she could review the past with satisfaction.
She didn’t regret that her best days were spent in chaos and excess, in defiance or indifference to religion, which so many use to degrade themselves, offend their Creator, and damage their souls. While she looked to the future without fear, and maybe even with happiness, she could reflect on the past with contentment.
As memory predominates over the other faculties of the mind in declining life, and as so much of our happiness or misery at that period must necessarily result from its exercise, it is of the utmost importance to lay up in store a good provision in the "sacred treasure of the past." Nothing can be more desirable than to leave the mind filled with pleasing recollections; and this can arise only from a life of holiness and purity. How awful is it to think that the last hours should be disturbed by images of crime unrepented of, the intrusion of which into the dying chamber no force can prevent! How lamentable to see the terrors of death aggravated by the remorse and horrors of retrospection! "Life," says a profound writer, [25] "in which nothing has been done or suffered to distinguish one day from another, is to him that has passed it as if it had never been, except that he is conscious how ill he has husbanded the great deposit of his Creator. Life, made memorable by crimes, and diversified through its several periods by wickedness, is indeed easily reviewed, but reviewed only with horror and remorse.
As we age, our memory becomes more dominant over other mental faculties, and a lot of our happiness or misery at that stage stems from how we engage with it. That's why it's crucial to build up a good supply in the "sacred treasure of the past." There’s nothing better than having a mind filled with joyful memories, which can only come from a life led with holiness and purity. It’s terrifying to imagine that our final hours could be disturbed by images of unrepentant crimes, which no force can keep out of the dying room! It's unfortunate to see the fear of death made worse by the guilt and nightmares of what we've done. "Life," says a profound writer, [25], "in which nothing has been done or suffered to distinguish one day from another, is to him that has passed it as if it had never been, except that he is conscious how ill he has managed the great gift of his Creator. A life marked by crimes and characterized by periods of wickedness is easy to look back on, but only with horror and regret."
"The great consideration which ought to influence us in the use of the present moment, is to arise from the effect which, as well or ill applied, it must have upon the time to come; for, though its actual existence be inconceivably short, yet its effects are unlimited, and there is not the smallest point of time but may extend its consequences, either to our hurt or our advantage, through all eternity, and give us reason to remember it forever with anguish or exultation." We may take occasion from the account of Anna to remark, that true religion is the most substantial support amidst the INFIRMITIES of age. This is emphatically the period of "evil days," when diseases prey upon the constitution, and the faculties both of body and mind decay. Then "the sun and the light, the moon and the stars are darkened;" the greatest change takes place in the outward circumstances of gladness and prosperity, the countenance of the man is altered, his complexion faded, and his intellectual faculties, as the understanding and the fancy, weakened. It is at this time "the keepers of the house tremble, and the strong men how themselves; the grinders cease, because they are few, and those that look out of the windows are darkened;" the strongest members of the body fail, the limbs bend beneath the weight of decrepitude and the effects of paralytic distempers, the teeth drop away, while the eyes grow dim and languid; "the doors are shut in the streets when the sound of the grinding is low," the mouth becoming sunken and closed; they "rise up at the voice of the bird," awakened from imperfect slumber when the cock crows or the birds begin their early songs; and "all the daughters of music," the tongue that expresses and the ears that are charmed with it, are "brought low;" they are "afraid of that which is high, and fears are in the way," alarmed at every step they take, lest they should stumble at the slightest obstacle, and especially apprehensive of the difficulties of any ascent. At that age their gray hairs thicken like the white flowers of the "almond tree" when it "flourishes," and even the very "grasshopper is a burden," for they cannot bear the slightest inconvenience, not even the weight of an insect, and "desire fails:" then is the "silver cord loosed, the golden bowl broken; the pitcher is broken at the fountain, and the wheel is broken at the cistern;" all the animal and vital functions at length cease, and every essential organ of life decays; "then shall the dust return to the earth as it was, and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it."
"The main thing we should think about when using the present moment is how it will affect the future, whether positively or negatively. Although this moment is incredibly brief, its impact can be limitless. Every single moment can stretch its consequences, either hurting or helping us, for all eternity, giving us reasons to remember it forever with pain or joy. We can take a lesson from Anna's story that true faith is the best support during the frailties of old age. This is definitely the time of 'evil days,' when illnesses attack the body, and both physical and mental abilities decline. At this point, 'the sun and the light, the moon and the stars are darkened;' the biggest changes can be seen in the external signs of happiness and success; a person's face changes, their complexion dulls, and mental abilities, like understanding and imagination, weaken. It's during this time that 'the keepers of the house tremble, and the strong men bow down; the grinders cease because they are few, and those who look out of the windows are darkened;' the body’s strongest parts fail, limbs bend under the weight of aging and paralysis, teeth fall out, and eyes become dim and tired; 'the doors are shut in the streets when the sound of grinding is low,' with the mouth becoming sunken and closed; they 'rise up at the sound of the bird,' waking from restless sleep at the crow of the rooster or the first songs of the birds; and 'all the daughters of music,' the tongue that speaks and the ears that listen, are 'brought low;' they become 'afraid of what is high, and fears are in the way,' anxious with every step they take for fear of tripping over the slightest thing, and especially wary of climbing. In old age, their gray hair thickens like the white flowers of the 'almond tree' when it 'blooms,' and even 'the grasshopper is a burden,' as they can't tolerate any kind of inconvenience, not even the weight of a bug, and 'desire fails:' at this point, 'the silver cord is loosened, the golden bowl is broken; the pitcher is shattered at the spring, and the wheel is broken at the well;' all bodily and vital functions eventually stop, and every essential organ of life deteriorates; 'then the dust will return to the earth as it was, and the spirit will return to God who gave it.'"
Reduced to the state of feebleness and incapacity, which the sacred penman so beautifully describes, man becomes an object of compassion; and it is affecting to see him struggling amidst the ruins of his former self. The sight becomes increasingly painful from the consideration that this is one day to be our own condition; that we too are destined to grow old, to quit the busy scene and the social circle for the solitude of age, and in our turn to be pitied--perhaps forsaken! But there is one thing capable not only of preserving the old from contempt, but of raising them to grandeur and diffusing lustre over their years of decrepitude. In contemplating Anna we do not think of her infirmities when we observe her piety: the meanness of the woman--tottering, crippled, dying--is lost amidst the majesty of the saint, incessantly serving God in his temple, and advancing to the grave "in a full age, like as a shock of corn cometh in his season." The dawning of a heavenly day seems to arise upon her "hoary head:" which, "being found in the way of righteousness," is a "crown of glory."
Reduced to a state of weakness and incapacity, as the sacred writer so beautifully describes, a person becomes an object of compassion; it's heart-wrenching to see them struggling amidst the ruins of their former self. The sight becomes increasingly painful knowing that this will one day be our own condition; that we too are destined to grow old, to leave the bustling world and social circle for the solitude of age, and in turn to be pitied—perhaps even abandoned! But there is one thing that can not only shield the elderly from contempt but can elevate them to greatness and bring light to their years of decline. When we think of Anna, we don't dwell on her frailties but on her piety: the frailty of the woman—shaky, crippled, dying—is overshadowed by the dignity of the saint, who constantly serves God in His temple, moving toward the grave "in a full age, like a shock of corn that comes in its season." The onset of a heavenly day seems to shine upon her "gray head," which, "being found in the way of righteousness," is a "crown of glory."
Anna's history further suggests, that religion is the most effectual guard against the VICES of advanced age. One of these is a spirit of querulousness. It is the common practice of those who believe themselves entitled to veneration on account of their years, to complain of the arrogant disregard of their counsels, which they impute to the rising generation. Cherishing the highest opinion of their own sentiments, to which they attribute a kind of infallibility, as being founded upon experience, they naturally expect implicit submission to their dictates and an exact conformity to their views: they require not only to be heard, but obeyed, and are impatient at the folly of those who rebel against their wisdom. Hence originate the often repeated tales of the degeneracy of the present times, and the growing insolence of the young. It may, indeed, be admitted, that, other things being equal, the aged have a just claim upon the attention of the young, whom they are sometimes qualified to instruct; but surely they are not always entitled to the same reverence, and age does not necessarily confer wisdom. Genuine humility, however, tends to correct the spirit of dictation, while it combines with an affectionate concern for the interests of those who are newly come into life; and genuine humility is the product of religion, which supplies motives to give advice with kindness, and to endure the rejection of it without anger.
Anna's history suggests that religion is the best defense against the vices of old age. One of these vices is a tendency to be overly critical. It's common for those who feel they deserve respect due to their age to complain about the dismissive attitude of younger people towards their advice. Believing their own opinions to be infallible, based on their life experiences, they naturally expect everyone to follow their guidance and adhere to their views. They want not just to be heard but to be obeyed, and they become frustrated with those who challenge their wisdom. This leads to frequent complaints about the decline of modern times and the increasing audacity of the young. While it's true that, all else being equal, older individuals deserve the attention of younger people and may even be able to teach them, they aren't always entitled to the same level of respect, and age doesn’t automatically mean wisdom. True humility, however, helps to temper the urge to dictate while fostering a genuine concern for the welfare of those who are just starting out in life; and true humility is a gift of religion, which encourages us to offer advice with kindness and to accept rejection without anger.
Another fault of age, is the indulgence of useless regrets for the past. In reviewing life, it is easy to discover instances of our own incaution or negligence, which have possibly influenced our affairs and been connected with many subsequent disappointments. We have not availed ourselves of fortunate conjunctures, or we have rejected profitable offers; one scheme has failed by our precipitancy, another by our procrastination--some persons, perhaps, have been foolishly trusted, and others as foolishly suspected--we have occasionally listened to advice which should not have been taken, or rejected what would have proved advantageous; and the consequence has been some diminution of fortune, some disappointment of our expectations, some failure in the crop of earthly enjoyment which we had anticipated. If it were possible to recall the years which have for ever rolled away, or if the felicity of a rational and immortal being consisted in the possession of temporal abundance, worldly honour, or corporeal gratification, these regrets would have some show of propriety, and might at least secure a patient hearing; hut it is certain, they only betray a weak or a wicked mind; it is perhaps equally certain, they will generally continue to occupy the thoughts of the aged. There is, in fact, but one remedy, "pure and undefiled religion." It is this alone which can fix in the mind a full persuasion of the nothingness of terrestrial pleasures and possessions. This only can console us after our ineffectual efforts to "gain the whole world," or amidst the loss of riches which have "taken to themselves wings," and long since "fled away," by the assurance, that nothing we ever possessed was adequate to render us happy, without other and better enjoyments--that upon a fair estimate, it is questionable whether the perplexities it occasioned did not counterbalance the advantages it either bestowed or promised--and that could we now call our own whatever we have most valued or desired of worldly good, it would prove incapable of making us substantially happy. He need not wish to renew life, who has the hope of a better existence--nor regret the loss of temporal advantages, if he have immortal good. He who "lays up for himself treasures in heaven," may defy the storms of time, and adopt the triumphant language of the apostle, amidst the wreck of earthly good, "having nothing, yet possessing all things."
Another issue that comes with age is the tendency to indulge in pointless regrets about the past. When we reflect on our lives, it's easy to spot moments where we acted carelessly or overlooked opportunities, which have likely impacted our lives and led to many subsequent disappointments. We may not have taken advantage of fortunate circumstances, or we might have turned down beneficial offers; one plan may have failed due to our impulsiveness, while another faltered due to our delay—some people may have been foolishly trusted, while others were unjustly doubted—we’ve sometimes heeded advice we should have disregarded and dismissed advice that could have brought us benefits; and as a result, we've experienced a loss in fortune, disappointment in our expectations, and a failure to enjoy the pleasures of life we had looked forward to. If we could somehow reclaim the years that have irretrievably slipped away, or if the happiness of a rational and eternal being depended solely on material wealth, social status, or physical pleasure, then these regrets might seem somewhat justified and could at least warrant a sympathetic ear; but in reality, they simply reveal a weak or misguided mind; and it is perhaps equally true that they will often occupy the thoughts of the elderly. In fact, there is only one solution: "pure and undefiled religion." It is this alone that can instill in the mind a deep conviction of the futility of earthly pleasures and possessions. This alone can comfort us after our unsuccessful attempts to "gain the whole world," or during the loss of wealth that has "taken to itself wings" and long since "fled away," by reassuring us that nothing we ever owned was enough to make us truly happy, without other and greater joys—that upon careful consideration, it's debatable whether the troubles it caused didn't outweigh the benefits it offered or promised—and that if we could now possess everything we have ever valued or desired in worldly terms, it still wouldn't be capable of making us genuinely happy. He shouldn't wish to relive life, who hopes for a better existence—nor lament the loss of worldly advantages, if he has something eternal to look forward to. He who "stores up treasures in heaven" can withstand life's storms and can confidently echo the apostle’s triumphant sentiment amidst the loss of earthly goods: "having nothing, yet possessing all things."
Similar views and principles alone can correct a third error of age, namely, the aim to prolong juvenility to an unnatural period. "To secure to the old that influence which they are willing to claim, and which might so much contribute to the improvement of the arts of life, it is absolutely necessary that they give themselves up to the duties of declining years; and contentedly resign to youth its levity, its pleasures, its frolics, and its fopperies. It is a hopeless endeavour to unite the contrarieties of spring and winter; it is unjust to claim the privileges of age, and retain the playthings of childhood. The young always form magnificent ideas of the wisdom and gravity of men whom they consider as placed at a distance from them in the ranks of existence, and naturally look on those whom they find trifling with long beards, with contempt and indignation, like that which women feel at the effeminacy of men. If dotards will contend with boys in those performances in which boys must always excel them, if they will dress crippled limbs in embroidery, endeavour at gayety with faltering voices, and darken assemblies of pleasure with the ghastliness of disease, they may well expect those who find their diversions obstructed will hoot them away; and that if they descend to competition with youth, they must bear the insolence of successful rivals." [26]
Similar views and principles can fix a third mistake of age, which is the desire to prolong youth into an unnatural period. "To allow older individuals to hold onto the influence they wish to have, which could greatly benefit the advancement of life’s arts, they must fully embrace the responsibilities that come with aging; they should willingly give up youth’s frivolity, pleasures, playfulness, and vanity. It is futile to try to combine the opposites of spring and winter; it's unfair to demand the rights of age while still clinging to the toys of childhood. Young people always have grand ideas about the wisdom and seriousness of those they see as being far ahead of them in life, and they naturally look down on those who appear trivial, like old men with long beards, with contempt and anger, similar to how women view the delicacy of men. If old folks insist on competing with kids in areas where kids will always outperform them, if they try to adorn frail bodies with fancy dressing, engage in cheerfulness with shaky voices, and darken joyful gatherings with the pallor of illness, they should expect those whose fun is disrupted to boo them away; and if they choose to compete with youth, they must endure the arrogance of their successful rivals." [26]
Religion also must be regarded as the best preparation for that END of life, with which old age is so closely connected. However proper it may be to realize this eventful time, at every period from our earliest to our latest day, it cannot but be regarded as more certainly and evident near at an advanced age. Anna, after the lapse of a century, had greater reason, surely, to apprehend her dissolution, than in the bloom of youth, or at the commencement of her widowhood; and how appaling the prospect!
Religion should also be seen as the best preparation for the end of life, which is closely tied to old age. While it's important to be aware of this significant time at every stage of life, it becomes much more obvious as we get older. After living for a hundred years, Anna had much more reason to fear her death than she did in her youth or when she first became a widow; and what a terrifying thought that is!
It would diminish the impression we have of the terror of death, if his dominion were limited to a part of the world, or to any ascertainable extent of years; but, while his authority continues unimpaired and his stroke irresistible, the power he is permitted to exercise over humankind is universal. In visiting the repositories of the dead, it is calculated to awaken our liveliest sensibilities to trace the reign of the "king of terrors" upon the sepulchral stone, or the marble monument. In characters which time has almost erased, we read the records of the past, and by a more than probable analogy penetrate some of the mysteries of the future. Here and there occur the names of those who were venerable for age, remarkable for their exploits, conspicuous by their station, rank, or talent--GREAT by the consent of their cotemporaries--who once figured upon a stage which is now decayed, or where illustrious in an empire which is now passed away. Some have been smitten by death's withering hand at an earlier, some at a later period of life. Adjoining the grave of age is the tomb of youth. There you see the stone half buried in accumulating heaps of earth, and the inscriptions of love and tenderness obscured by collecting moss; while the hand that wrote them has long since become motionless, and the heart that dictated them ceased to beat.
It would lessen our fear of death if his reign were limited to just part of the world or a specific number of years. However, since his power remains unchallenged and his blow unstoppable, the influence he holds over humanity is all-encompassing. When we visit the resting places of the dead, it distinctly stirs our deepest feelings to see the rule of the "king of terrors" carved into the gravestones or marble monuments. In words that time has nearly erased, we read the history of the past, and through a likely connection, we gain insights into some of the mysteries of the future. Occasionally, we find the names of those who were respected for their age, celebrated for their achievements, distinguished by their position, status, or talent—GREAT by the acknowledgment of their peers—who once played a role on a stage that has now faded, or shone in an empire that has long disappeared. Some were taken by death's cruel grip early in life, while others faced it later. Next to the grave of the aged lies the tomb of the young. There you see the stone partially buried under piles of earth, and the messages of love and affection are hidden beneath growing moss; while the hand that inscribed them has long since gone still, and the heart that inspired them has stopped beating.
It is affecting to visit places of public resort, under the full influence of the consideration, that this busy and anxious crowd will soon disappear--their race will be run, and the immortal prize gained--or--lost! These possessors of the soil will, in a little time, be disinherited--these tenants of a day exchanged--the funeral pall will cover the most ambitious and the most active of them all, and the motley multitude be succeeded by others equally busy, equally anxious, equally thoughtless of another state of being--and equally mortal!
It's striking to visit places where people gather, fully aware that this bustling and worried crowd will soon vanish—their time will pass, and the eternal reward will be won or lost! These landowners will soon be displaced—these temporary residents will be replaced—the funeral shroud will cover the most ambitious and energetic among them, and the diverse crowd will be replaced by others who are just as busy, just as worried, just as oblivious to another state of being—and just as mortal!
But these sentiments, however calculated to fill irreligious persons with dread and melancholy, can produce no despondency in those who, like Anna, are accustomed to the truths of religion, and derive the chief pleasure both of their youthful and decrepit age from the services of religion. With regard to death itself they are taught that his power is limited to the body, and that it is restricted even to a short period over this inferior part of our nature; and as to its consequences, they cannot incessantly frequent the temple, and be occupied in devotion, without learning the value, as well as the reality, of those considerations which are drawn from eternity. They know that "this corruptible shall put on incorruption, this mortal put on immortality," and that then "there shall be no more death." And what do these expressions imply, but, the entire renovation of our nature?--Man is mortal, because he is sinful; and, consequently, the removal of sin will prove the extinction of death. It is only by the introduction of moral evil that the earth has been converted into a vast cemetery, and life become a short and rugged passage to the sepulchre; but when it shall no longer prevail, our sanctified nature will inherit the abodes of purity and undecaying existence. It is this consideration which endears celestial felicity. Exemption from death implies deliverance from sin, and the Christian wishes to possess a character which God shall approve, and to be cleansed from those stains of guilt which infect his present being, and render him offensive to his Father in heaven. Were he destined always to be unholy, he would scarcely contemplate immortality as a blessing; but because he has reason to anticipate "a waking" from the sleep of the grave, in the divine "likeness," he realizes a period in the bright annals of his future being, when he shall no longer have occasion to exclaim, "O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?" The pains of separation, too, which afflict this mortal state, cannot exist in that "better country." Society will unquestionably prove one considerable source of the happiness of heaven, where immortal beings will be so circumstanced and capacitated, as both to receive and impart enjoyment. The very nature of man is constituted social; and though our circumstances in this life often render temporary separations unavoidable, in a perfect state of society they must be needless; consequently they will not be suffered to impair the joys of paradise.
But these thoughts, while likely to fill non-religious people with fear and sadness, can’t bring despair to those like Anna, who are familiar with the truths of faith and find their main joy in worship throughout their lives. When it comes to death itself, they learn that its power is only over the body, and that it lasts a short time for this lesser part of our being; and regarding its consequences, being regularly present in worship and engaged in prayer helps them understand the importance and reality of eternal truths. They know that "this corruptible will put on incorruption, this mortal will put on immortality," and then "there will be no more death." What do these sayings mean but the complete renewal of our nature?—Humans are mortal because they are sinful; thus, the removal of sin will lead to the end of death. It's the presence of moral evil that turned the earth into a massive graveyard, making life a brief and difficult journey to the tomb; but when sin is no longer a problem, our redeemed nature will inherit realms of purity and everlasting life. This thought makes heavenly happiness even more precious. Freedom from death means freedom from sin, and Christians desire to have a character that pleases God and to be cleansed from the guilt that taints their present lives and makes them unacceptable to their Father in heaven. If they were destined to be unholy forever, they wouldn’t see immortality as a blessing; but because they hope for a "waking" from the grave in divine "likeness," they envision a time in the bright story of their future existence when they won't have to cry out, "O wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from this body of death?" The pains of separation that trouble this mortal life won’t exist in that "better country." Community will surely be a significant source of happiness in heaven, where immortal beings will be positioned and able to both receive and share joy. The very essence of humanity is social; and although our circumstances in this life often make temporary separations unavoidable, in a perfect society, they would be unnecessary; therefore, they will not diminish the joys of paradise.
The most afflictive of all separations, is that which is occasioned by death. In all other cases, a lingering hope may exist of a reunion at some period however distant; at least the possibility of it is cheering: but, even if there be no reasonable expectation of this, the very consciousness that our friend is still alive, still on earth, still capable of receiving and performing acts of kindness, still able to communicate with us by letter or by message, to participate our pleasures, to sympathize with our sorrows, and to pray for our welfare, is consoling in every vicissitude;--but when death sets his awful seal upon our companion, relative or friend, we cherish a deeper feeling of grief, and cannot look to any earthly means of consolation--but we can look to a heavenly one! Whatever resource fails, the religion of the Bible supplies inexhaustible springs of comfort. God is on high--Jesus "ever lives"--Christians know they shall soon pass into a world where the happy circle will never be broken, the communion of kindred spirits never cease, the day of blessedness never decline, the sabbath of immortality never terminate.
The hardest separation of all is the one caused by death. In other situations, there might be a lingering hope for a reunion at some point, no matter how far off; at least the thought of it brings some comfort. Even if there’s no real expectation of this, just knowing that our friend is still alive, still here on earth, still able to show kindness, still capable of communicating with us through letters or messages, sharing in our joys, sympathizing with our sorrows, and praying for our well-being, is comforting in every situation. But when death takes our companion, relative, or friend, we feel a deeper grief and can't look to any earthly means for comfort—however, we can look to a heavenly one! No matter what resources fail us, the teachings of the Bible provide endless sources of comfort. God is up high—Jesus “ever lives”—Christians know they will soon enter a world where the happy circle will never be broken, the connection of kindred spirits will never end, the day of happiness will never fade, and the sabbath of immortality will never conclude.
It is in the temple also, that those who like Anna receive just impressions from its services, and live in a state of holy intercourse with God, learn to appreciate the capacities of a spiritual mind for progression in wisdom and felicity, and by consequence to cherish the noblest anticipations of their own future possible elevation of character. How many unfinished schemes are frustrated by death! Our plans of futurity, our purposes of gain, or our resolves of usefulness, may be ended in one short hour. Here the labours of the industrious, the studies of the learned, the investigations of the philosopher, and the career of the pious, close. The grave silences the voice of the preacher, and paralyzes the hand of the charitable. Here the arguments of a Paul end--here the silver tongue of an Apollos is speechless--here the hands of a Dorcas cease to manufacture for the poor, whose unavailing tears cannot recall departed piety.
It’s in the temple where those like Anna receive meaningful impressions from its services and live in a state of close connection with God. They learn to appreciate the potential of a spiritual mind for growth in wisdom and happiness, and as a result, they come to value their highest hopes for future character development. How many unfinished plans are cut short by death! Our future goals, our plans for success, or our intentions to be helpful can all end in just an hour. Here, the efforts of the hardworking, the studies of the educated, the inquiries of the philosopher, and the journey of the faithful all come to an end. The grave silences the preacher’s voice and stops the hands of the charitable. Here, the arguments of a Paul come to a halt—here, the eloquent words of an Apollos fall silent—here, the hands of a Dorcas stop providing for the poor, whose helpless tears cannot bring back the departed faith.
But who will define the limits of possible attainment in knowledge and excellence in a state of deathless existence? Society is always improving, even in the present world, amidst all its imperfections. The researches of past ages have transmitted a vast stock of wisdom to their successors, both in reference to natural science and religious truth. Who can tell what discoveries a Newton might have made, had he possessed a terrestrial immortality? or who can conceive what heights and depths of divine knowledge might have been disclosed, had the apostles of Christ been permitted to live to the present period, and had it been the will of God that they should have received a constant succession of revelations?
But who will set the boundaries of what we can achieve in knowledge and excellence in a state of never-ending existence? Society is always evolving, even today, despite all its flaws. The studies of the past have passed down a vast amount of wisdom to those who come after, in both natural science and religious truth. Who can say what discoveries a Newton could have made if he had lived forever? Or who can imagine the heights and depths of divine knowledge that might have been revealed if Christ's apostles had been allowed to live until now, and if it was God's will for them to continually receive new revelations?
In both these cases, not only has death terminated this series of bright discovery, but this earth is not the destined place, nor time the destined period, for those manifestations of eternal wisdom, which we have reason to believe will take place in another world. Those impediments to knowledge, and those reasons for concealment, which at present exist, will be removed, and truth open all her treasures to immortalized and sanctified spirits. The consequence of the progressive disclosure of spiritual things, of the works and ways of God, will be progressive improvement: and, as in consequence of the clearer development of truth in the Gospel, "he who is least in the kingdom of heaven, is greater than John the Baptist;" so when all the shadows and clouds that bedim our present existence shall have disappeared, and a ray of heaven pours its glorious illumination upon the mysteries of time, the least in the paradise of God will be greater than the most distinguished in his church on earth. And as we never shall cease to improve in knowledge--for there will be no termination to our spiritual researches--there will probably arrive a period in eternity, when he who at the resurrection will be least in the heavenly world in capacity and glory, will become greater in consequence of ever new discoveries, than at that moment will be the greatest of the redeemed universe. And the meanest Christian on earth may indulge the hope that, at a future age, even he may become superior in knowledge, in love, in capacity, and in glory, to what the brightest seraph or the tallest archangel, is at present in the heaven of heavens; for who can tell what God may do for beatified souls? who dare limit the operations of his mercy, or who can imagine to what an elevation of wisdom and felicity an emparadised believer may attain?
In both of these situations, not only has death brought an end to this series of bright discoveries, but this world isn't the right place, nor is this the right time, for the displays of eternal wisdom that we believe will happen in another world. The barriers to knowledge and the reasons for concealment that exist now will be lifted, and truth will reveal all its treasures to immortal and sanctified spirits. The result of the ongoing revelation of spiritual matters and the works and ways of God will be continuous improvement: just as because of the clearer understanding of truth in the Gospel, "the least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than John the Baptist," when all the shadows and clouds that obscure our current existence have vanished, and a ray of heaven shines its glorious light on the mysteries of time, the least in God's paradise will be greater than the most distinguished in His church on earth. And since we will never stop growing in knowledge—there will be no end to our spiritual explorations—there will likely come a time in eternity when the person who is least in the heavenly realm in capability and glory at the resurrection will become greater through ongoing discoveries than the greatest in the redeemed universe at that moment. And even the simplest Christian on earth can hope that, in a future age, they too may surpass the brightest seraph or the mightiest archangel in knowledge, love, capacity, and glory, as they exist now in the highest heaven; for who can predict what God may do for blessed souls? Who can limit the reach of His mercy, or who can imagine how high in wisdom and happiness a glorified believer might rise?
Progression is the law of a thinking being. And why should it not operate upon holy intelligences in the future state, as well as in the present? and why not when "there shall be no more death," to an incalculably greater extent? Why should not every new idea acquired in that world become a seed of truth in the mind, that shall spring up and bear fruit, multiply and expand, without restriction and without end?--
Progression is the principle for a thinking being. And why shouldn’t it apply to holy intelligences in the afterlife, just like it does now? And why not when "there shall be no more death," to an even greater degree? Why shouldn't every new idea gained in that world become a seed of truth in the mind, that will grow and produce fruit, multiply and expand, without limits and without end?
There is not in religion a nobler or a more animating sentiment, than this perpetual advancement of the soul towards perfection. Life has its maturity and decline, nature its boundaries of beauty, human affairs their zenith of glory; but, in "the new heavens and new earth wherein dwelleth righteousness," every thing will be eternally upon the advance--there will be no end to the path of knowledge--present acquisitions will be the basis of subsequent acquirements--we shall be continually outshining ourselves, by making nearer approaches to infinite goodness--and the whole moral creation will be forever beautifying in the eyes of God.
There isn’t a nobler or more inspiring feeling in religion than the constant journey of the soul towards perfection. Life has its peaks and declines, nature has its limits of beauty, and human affairs have their moments of glory; but in "the new heavens and new earth where righteousness resides," everything will be continuously moving forward—there will be no end to the pursuit of knowledge—what we learn now will serve as the foundation for what we’ll discover next—we will always be surpassing ourselves by getting closer to infinite goodness—and all of moral creation will be eternally viewed as beautiful in God’s eyes.
The Woman of Samaria.
Chapter IV.
Account of Christ's Journey through Samaria--he arrives at Jacob's Well--enters into conversation with a Woman of the Country--her Misapprehensions--the Discovery of his Character to her as a Prophet--her Convictions--her Admission of his Claim as the true Messiah, which she reports in the City--the great and good Effect--Reflections.
Account of Christ's Journey through Samaria—he arrives at Jacob's Well—he starts a conversation with a Woman from the area—her misunderstandings—her realization of his identity as a Prophet—her beliefs—her acknowledgment of his claim as the true Messiah, which she shares in the City—the significant and positive impact—reflections.
Every incident in the life of Christ is illustrative of the evangelical testimony, "he went about doing good." His efforts were not partial, nor confined to particular occasions; but, availing himself of all the opportunities which occurred, either in public or in private, to promote the welfare of mankind, time never measured out an idle hour--the sun never sat upon a useless day!
Every event in Christ's life exemplifies the gospel truth that "he went about doing good." His actions were neither limited nor restricted to specific moments; instead, he seized every opportunity that arose, whether in public or private, to enhance the well-being of humanity. Time never allowed for a wasted hour—the sun never set on a meaningless day!
It may be truly said, with regard to those who imbibe the spirit of their Master, "no man liveth to himself." Nothing can be more remote from genuine Christianity, than that selfishness which is characteristic of a worldly disposition, and which with an uniform and undeviating assiduity, seeks its own interests and purposes: while nothing can so fully comport with its nature, and evince its prevalence, as that charity which is limited only by the period of human life, the extent of means, and the boundaries of creation.
It can truly be said about those who embody the spirit of their Master, "no one lives for themselves." Nothing is further from genuine Christianity than the selfishness typical of a worldly mindset, which consistently and relentlessly pursues its own interests and goals. In contrast, nothing aligns more with its essence or shows its impact than the charity that is only limited by the span of human life, the availability of resources, and the boundaries of creation.
"When the Lord knew that the Pharisees had heard that Jesus made and baptized more disciples than John ... he left Judea and departed again into Galilee."
"When the Lord realized that the Pharisees had heard that Jesus was making and baptizing more disciples than John ... he left Judea and went back to Galilee."
The jealousy of his enemies induced them to become narrow observers of all the proceedings of Christ; and, knowing their spirit, he removed to some distance: not, however, through fear--nor (as some expositors have stated) lest they should put him to death; for his hour was not yet come--and it would have been impossible to counteract the purposes of Heaven. He could easily have eluded their utmost vigilance and malignity, as on a certain occasion, when "passing through the midst of them, he went his way." But our Lord did not think proper to disclose himself at once, and in a very public manner. It was not his intention to astonish, but gradually to excite the attention of the Jewish nation, to furnish evidences of his mission to humble and contrite minds, and to lay the foundation of a future work, rather than to operate on a very extended scale himself. In this manner was accomplished the prophecy of Isaiah, "He shall not cry, nor lift up, nor cause his voice to be heard in the street. A bruised reed shall he not break, and the smoking flax shall he not quench: he shall bring forth judgment unto truth."
The jealousy of his enemies made them closely watch all of Christ's actions; and, knowing their motives, he moved away a bit: not out of fear—nor, as some interpreters have suggested, because they might kill him; for his time had not yet come—and it would have been impossible to go against the plans of Heaven. He could have easily slipped past their keen observation and malice, as he did on one occasion when "passing through the midst of them, he went his way." But our Lord chose not to reveal himself immediately and in such a public way. He didn't intend to shock people but rather to gradually draw the attention of the Jewish nation, provide proof of his mission to humble and contrite hearts, and lay the groundwork for future work, rather than to create a large-scale impact himself. This way, the prophecy of Isaiah was fulfilled, "He shall not cry, nor lift up, nor cause his voice to be heard in the street. A bruised reed shall he not break, and the smoking flax shall he not quench: he shall bring forth judgment unto truth."
His route lay through Samaria; any other way to Galilee would have been very circuitous: and this is mentioned, because of the directions to his disciples, "Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not; but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel." The hour for that enlarged operation of mercy amongst the Gentiles, which had been so long predicted, was not yet arrived, though it was now approaching with desirable rapidity. The dispensations of God are inscrutable to mortals, to whom it seems profoundly mysterious, that the purposes of love to man should first be delayed for so many ages, and then manifested by the work of Christ to so limited an extent. Here we must "walk by faith, not by sight;" while, upon every leaf in the great volume of providence, it is legibly written, "My thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the Lord. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways, higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts."
His route went through Samaria; any other path to Galilee would have been very roundabout. This is mentioned because of the instructions to his disciples: "Don’t go the way of the Gentiles, and don’t enter any city of the Samaritans; but go instead to the lost sheep of the house of Israel." The time for that broader act of kindness among the Gentiles, which had been foretold for so long, had not yet come, although it was getting closer at a desirable pace. God's plans are beyond human understanding; it seems deeply mysterious to us that His loving intentions toward humanity would be delayed for so many ages and then revealed through Christ to such a limited degree. Here we must "walk by faith, not by sight;" and on every page of the great book of providence, it is clearly written, "My thoughts are not your thoughts, nor are your ways my ways, says the Lord. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts."
It has been piously remarked, that the evangelist refers, by the expression, "he must needs go through Samaria," to our Saviour's purposes of mercy to that vicinity; and undoubtedly it is true, that he was powerfully impelled and irresistibly guided, wherever he went. Nothing could obstruct his designs of mercy, or his labours of love. No force could prevent his benevolent progress: as well might human or diabolical agency attempt to arrest the sun in his course, or stop the march of time.--"My Father worketh hitherto, and I work." "I must work the works of him that sent me, while it is day; the night cometh, when no man can work."
It has been thoughtfully noted that the evangelist means, by saying "he must needs go through Samaria," that our Savior had a mission of mercy for that area; and it’s certainly true that he was strongly driven and undeniably led wherever he went. Nothing could stand in the way of his merciful intentions or his acts of love. No force could halt his compassionate journey: just as human or demonic power might as well try to stop the sun in its path, or pause the passage of time.--"My Father is working until now, and so am I." "I must do the work of the one who sent me while it is day; the night is coming when no one can work."
In his journey, Jesus came to a city of Samaria called Sychar, which appears to have been the same with the Sichem or Shechem of the Old Testament; [27] where was a well, to which tradition had assigned the name of Jacob, as having been originally dug by that patriarch. It was now about the sixth hour, or noon, and the climate being exceedingly sultry, Jesus, under the pressure of fatigue, sat down by the well.
In his journey, Jesus arrived at a Samaritan city called Sychar, which seems to be the same as the Sichem or Shechem of the Old Testament; [27] where there was a well that tradition said was named after Jacob, as he was believed to have dug it. It was around noon, and with the weather being extremely hot, Jesus, feeling exhausted, sat down by the well.
Let us for a moment turn aside, like Moses, to "see this great sight." Jesus "sat thus on the well," as the weary traveller seeks a renewal of his strength by temporary repose. What majesty and mystery surround the spot, when we recall the ancient oracles to mind, which represent him as "the Wonderful, Counsellor, the mighty God, the everlasting Father, the Prince of Peace;" and compare descriptions of this nature with the evangelical record of his own words, "The foxes have holes, and the birds of the air have nests: but the Son of man hath not where to lay his head."
Let’s take a moment to step aside, like Moses, to "see this great sight." Jesus "sat by the well," just as a tired traveler rests to regain their strength. What majesty and mystery surround this place when we think of the ancient prophecies that describe him as "the Wonderful, Counselor, the mighty God, the everlasting Father, the Prince of Peace;" and compare those descriptions with the biblical record of his own words, "The foxes have holes, and the birds of the air have nests: but the Son of man has nowhere to lay his head."
What a scene for ministering spirits, who had been accustomed to behold and adore him, but who now witnessed his abasement! What a contrast between "the Lamb in the midst of the throne," and Jesus sitting on a well, and afterward suspended on a cross--between the "King of glory:" and the weary traveller--the "Lord of lords," and the "man of sorrows!"
What a sight for the ministering spirits, who were used to seeing and worshipping him, but who now saw his humiliation! What a stark difference between "the Lamb in the midst of the throne" and Jesus sitting by a well, and then hanging on a cross—between the "King of glory" and the tired traveler—the "Lord of lords" and the "man of sorrows!"
Let us derive instruction, as well as consolation, from this scene. "We have not a high-priest, who cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities: but was in all points tempted, like as we are, yet without sin." If the Saviour had appeared upon earth in external splendour, and in a manner which to human apprehension would have comported better with the majesty of his nature and the pre-eminence of his celestial glory, our insignificance would have created a sense of unapproachable distance: we should have been more astonished than attracted--more confounded than, conciliated. But he disrobed himself of ineffable brightness to bring us nigh, and to produce a just and holy familiarity, saying to his disciples, "I have called you friends."
Let’s take lessons and find comfort in this scene. "We don’t have a high priest who isn’t able to empathize with our weaknesses; he was tempted in every way just as we are, yet he never sinned." If the Savior had come to earth in dazzling splendor and in a way that seemed more fitting for his divine nature and heavenly glory, we would have felt too insignificant and far away. We would have been more astonished than drawn in—more overwhelmed than warmly accepted. But he set aside his incredible brightness to bring us closer and create a genuine and holy connection, telling his disciples, "I have called you friends."
Let us be reconciled to the infirmities, pains, and poverty we may suffer; for it is "sufficient for the servant to be as his master." More elevated stations in life would be attended with more danger to our spiritual character, and expose us to more afflictions; as mountains in proportion to their height attract clouds and tempests. The present is a state of trial for the righteous; but however distressing or obscure our way, Jesus has trod it before us--sanctifying the path of sorrow by his presence, and plucking up many of its thorns. Place his example before your eyes--observe his humble life--his assumed poverty--his unaffected condescension! To the poor he preached--with the poor he lived--their dress he wore--and their lowly sphere he chose and honoured!
Let's accept the weaknesses, pains, and poverty we may experience; for it is "enough for the servant to be like his master." Higher positions in life would come with greater risks to our spiritual character and expose us to more hardships; just as tall mountains attract clouds and storms. The present is a time of testing for the righteous; yet no matter how distressing or unclear our path may seem, Jesus has walked it before us—making the path of sorrow holy through his presence and removing many of its thorns. Keep his example in mind—look at his humble life—his deliberately chosen poverty—his genuine humility! He preached to the poor—he lived with the poor—he wore their clothes—and he chose and honored their lowly status!
How many of the most important events of our lives may be traced to trifling circumstances! A single step may have a remote, but very obvious connexion with the greatest results. A single turn in the journey of life may influence the happiness, and direct the course of years! "There cometh a woman of Samaria, to draw water." Nothing could be more apparently incidental; and yet he who thinks rightly will perceive it to be a link in the great chain of Providence, which was absolutely essential to the completion of the whole. It was in the purpose of God, that many of the Samaritans of that city should believe--that this conviction should be wrought by that woman, who herself should be forcibly impressed by the proofs with which she was furnished in the relation of her most private domestic concerns. Had she come earlier or later, Jesus had not been there!
How many of the most important events in our lives can be linked to minor circumstances! A single step can have a distant but clear connection to the biggest outcomes. A single turn in life's journey can affect happiness and shape the course of years! "There comes a woman from Samaria to draw water." It may seem completely incidental; yet, anyone who thinks clearly will see it as a crucial link in the broader plan of Providence, which was vital for the completion of everything. It was God's intention that many of the Samaritans in that city would believe—that this belief would come through that woman, who herself would be deeply moved by the evidence related to her most private domestic issues. If she had come earlier or later, Jesus wouldn't have been there!
We must trace the links of this chain further. The malignity of the Pharisees induced Jesus to leave Judea; and both convenience, and perhaps a moral necessity, impelled him here. His arrival at that hour--his stay--the opportunity occasioned by the absence of his disciples--were all appointed by superintending wisdom. Who knows what a day or an hour may bring forth! Little did this Samaritan woman expect such a meeting, such a traveller, or such a conversation; so wisely and so wonderfully are the plans of Providence arranged!
We need to follow the connections in this chain further. The hostility of the Pharisees caused Jesus to leave Judea, and both convenience and possibly a moral obligation brought him here. His arrival at that moment, his stay, and the chance created by the absence of his disciples were all guided by a higher wisdom. Who knows what a day or an hour might bring! This Samaritan woman had no idea she would encounter such a traveler or have such a conversation; the plans of Providence are arranged so wisely and wonderfully!
How often has the promise been accomplished, "I was found of them that sought me not!" To some unforeseen occurrence--some accidental meeting--some trifling coincidence, Christians may often trace their first conversion, and their best impressions. A stranger--a word, a casualty, has proved the means of spiritual illumination; and while the recollection of these circumstances often solace them in the vale of tears, we doubt not but they will furnish a subject of pleasing contemplation and adorning gratitude, when they shall have attained the perfection of their being on the heights of immortality.
How often has the promise been fulfilled, "I was found by those who weren’t looking for me!" Through some unexpected event—an accidental meeting—a small coincidence—Christians can often trace their first conversion and their most meaningful experiences. A stranger, a word, an incident has sparked their spiritual awakening; and while remembering these moments often brings them comfort during difficult times, we have no doubt that they will provide a source of joyful reflection and gratefulness when they reach the ultimate perfection of their existence in the heights of immortality.
"Jesus saith unto her, Give me to drink:" a very natural request from a weary stranger, and one with which, from the common hospitality of the times, he might expect a ready compliance. The evil effect of luxury is, that it has multiplied our artificial necessities, and diminished our benevolent feelings; in a simpler state of society, the wants of mankind are fewer and more easily supplied.
"Jesus said to her, 'Give me a drink': a very natural request from a tired stranger, and one that, given the hospitality of the time, he might expect to be met with a willing response. The negative impact of luxury is that it has increased our artificial needs and reduced our generous attitudes; in a simpler society, people's needs are fewer and easier to meet."
The woman paused and inquired, "How is it that thou, being a Jew, asketh drink of me, which am a woman of Samaria? for the Jews have no dealings with the Samaritans." Alas! where rancorous animosity exists, how frequently the laws of hospitality, and the principles even of humanity, are sacrificed! The Sanhedrim interdicted any friendly intercourse with the Samaritans, and the Jews cursed them by the secret name of God; and as this mutual animosity existed, the woman received our Saviour's request with a reproachful sneer.
The woman paused and asked, "How is it that you, a Jew, ask me for a drink, a woman from Samaria? Jews don’t associate with Samaritans." It's sad how often hostility overrides the rules of hospitality and even basic human decency! The Sanhedrin prohibited any friendly contact with the Samaritans, and the Jews cursed them with the secret name of God; given this shared hostility, the woman responded to our Savior's request with a scornful sneer.
The enmity subsisting between the Jews and Samaritans was very ancient in its origin, and exceedingly inveterate in its character. It had also been aggravated by different incidents. When the ten tribes revolted in the time of Jeroboam, the calves were set up in Dan and Bethel, with a view to seduce the people from worshipping at Jerusalem, which was of course highly offensive to Judah and Benjamin; and when Shalmaneser, the king of Assyria, carried away the ten tribes into captivity, he colonized the cities of Samaria with the Babylonians and others, who carried their false religion with them; in consequence of which they became odious to the Jews. At first, the providence of God punished these idolatrous settlers, by permitting lions to infest the country, whose ravages induced Shalmaneser to send one of the priests "to teach them the manner of the God of the land;" when they united the worship of the Jehovah with that of their own idols. These people very much discouraged the Jews in the erection of the second temple, after their return from captivity.
The hostility between the Jews and Samaritans dates back to ancient times and was deeply entrenched. It was made worse by various events. When the ten tribes revolted during Jeroboam's reign, they set up golden calves in Dan and Bethel to lure people away from worshipping in Jerusalem, which deeply offended Judah and Benjamin. Later, when Shalmaneser, the king of Assyria, took the ten tribes into exile, he repopulated the cities of Samaria with Babylonians and others, who brought their false religions with them, making them detestable to the Jews. Initially, God's providence punished these idolatrous settlers by allowing lions to roam the land, causing Shalmaneser to send one of the priests "to teach them the manner of the God of the land;" when they combined the worship of Jehovah with their own idols. These people significantly hindered the Jews in building the second temple after they returned from exile.
After this, when Alexander had conquered Syria and Palestine, Sanballat, who governed the province of Samaria for Darius, submitted to the conqueror; and having married his daughter to Manasseh, the brother of Jaddua the high-priest, he obtained permission from Alexander to build a temple on mount Gerizzim, in imitation of that which was built at Jerusalem. [28] Manasseh was constituted the high-priest, a multitude of Jews mixed with the Samaritans, and a distinct service, after the Jewish mode of worship, was conducted. This occasioned great contentions, and suspended all intercourse between the rival nations. The Samaritans are generally said to have admitted little more of the Old Testament than the Pentateuch; but Justin Martyr, who was a native of Sichem, affirms that they received all the prophetic writings. [29]
After this, when Alexander conquered Syria and Palestine, Sanballat, who was in charge of the Samaria province for Darius, submitted to the conqueror. He married his daughter to Manasseh, the brother of Jaddua the high priest, and got Alexander's permission to build a temple on Mount Gerizzim, similar to the one in Jerusalem. [28] Manasseh was made the high priest, a large number of Jews mixed with the Samaritans, and a separate service, following the Jewish style of worship, was held. This led to major conflicts and halted all interactions between the two rival nations. The Samaritans are generally said to have accepted little more of the Old Testament than the Pentateuch, but Justin Martyr, who was from Sichem, claims that they accepted all the prophetic writings. [29]
Drop a pitying tear over human weakness, folly, and crime. What divisions separate the human race, and exasperate men against each other! But of all others, they are the most inveterate, which are produced on account of religion. The Samaritan appoints Gerizzim as the place of worship, in opposition to Jerusalem--the fires of persecution are instantly kindled, and the victims of intolerance suffer martyrdom!
Drop a sympathetic tear for human weakness, foolishness, and wrongdoing. What divides the human race and fuels animosity between people! But the most deep-seated of all are those caused by religion. The Samaritan chooses Gerizzim as the place of worship, opposing Jerusalem—the fires of persecution are quickly ignited, and the victims of intolerance endure martyrdom!
To the reproachful insinuation of the woman, Christ returned no answer, for it kindled no resentment. When he was reviled, he reviled not again: but with his characteristic condescension and eagerness to instruct the ignorant, he said, "If thou knewest the gift of God, and who it is that saith to thee, Give me to drink; thou wouldest have asked of him, and he would have given thee living water." This language was expressive of his readiness and ability to supply the necessities of the destitute, to console the afflicted, and to save the lost. By the "gift of God," he intended divine bounty in general; by "living water," the blessings of salvation, especially the gifts and graces of "his holy Spirit." [30]
To the woman's critical suggestion, Christ didn't respond, as it didn't provoke any anger in him. When he was insulted, he didn't insult back; instead, with his usual kindness and desire to teach those who didn't understand, he said, "If you knew the gift of God and who it is that says to you, 'Give me a drink,' you would have asked him, and he would have given you living water." This statement reflected his willingness and ability to meet the needs of the needy, comfort the suffering, and save those who are lost. By "the gift of God," he meant divine generosity in general; by "living water," he referred to the blessings of salvation, especially the gifts and graces of "his holy Spirit." [30]
The conciliating and affectionate manner of Christ's appeal to the woman, appears to have softened her turbulent spirit, and won her respect. She uses an epithet of respect previously omitted, "Sir,"--perceiving that, though apparently a Jew, he possessed none of that rancorous enmity which characterizes others, and cherished national antipathies. "A soft answer turneth away wrath; but grievous words stir up anger." Offences are likely to arise in the present world; but let us rather aim to disarm malignity by conciliation, than strengthen and envenom it by resistance. Soft words may in time operate on hardened hearts, as water continually dropping on the rock wears it away. Such a mode of proceeding costs us little, but tends much to dignify and exalt us. "Who is a wise man and endued with knowledge among you? let him show out of a good conversation his works with meekness of wisdom. But if ye have bitter envying and strife in your hearts, glory not, and lie not against the truth. This wisdom descendeth not from above, but is earthly, sensual, devilish. For where envying and strife is, there is confusion and every evil work. But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be entreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy. And the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace of them that make peace."
The friendly and caring way Christ spoke to the woman seems to have calmed her restless spirit and earned her respect. She now addresses him with the respectful term "Sir," realizing that, even though he seemed to be a Jew, he didn’t share the hostile feelings that others had and didn’t hold onto national grudges. "A gentle answer turns away anger, but harsh words stir up wrath." Conflicts are bound to happen in this world, but we should choose to defuse negativity through kindness rather than escalate it with resistance. Gentle words can eventually soften the hardest hearts, just like water dripping on a rock gradually wears it down. This approach requires little effort from us, yet it greatly elevates our dignity. "Who among you is wise and understanding? Let them demonstrate their good deeds through their actions, showing humility and wisdom. But if you harbor bitter jealousy and conflict in your hearts, don’t boast or deny the truth. That kind of wisdom doesn’t come from above; it is earthly, unspiritual, and demonic. Where jealousy and conflict exist, there is disorder and every kind of evil. But the wisdom that comes from above is first pure, then peaceful, gentle, and willing to yield, full of mercy and good fruit, without favoritism and insincerity. And the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace by those who make peace."
Our Saviour's discourse was further distinguished by "exceeding great and precious promises;" and the woman seems to have partaken of similar surprise with those who are said to have "wondered at the gracious words which proceeded out of his mouth." As a "fountain of living waters," he was always pouring forth refreshing streams; as the depository of wisdom and knowledge, he incessantly communicated his treasures of sacred instruction; and as the "Sun of righteousness," he constantly imparted his heavenly light and heating beams. Who could approach him without feeling the benign influence, and being benefitted by the rich supply?
Our Savior's message was also marked by "incredibly great and precious promises," and the woman seemed to share the same amazement as those who "marveled at the kind words that came out of his mouth." As a "source of living waters," he was always offering refreshing streams; as the keeper of wisdom and knowledge, he constantly shared his treasures of sacred teaching; and as the "Sun of righteousness," he always gave his heavenly light and warm rays. Who could come near him without feeling his kind influence and being enriched by his abundant gifts?
As the term which Christ had employed in a spiritual sense, simply denoted excellent spring water in common language, the woman at present conceived no other idea of his meaning; and seeing he was a stranger, with no bucket, she expressed her astonishment at his promise. With some mysterious impression, probably, of his extraordinary character, blended with incredulity, she proceeded to inquire, "Art thou greater than our father Jacob, which gave us the well, and drank thereof himself, and his children, and his cattle?"
As the term Christ used in a spiritual way simply referred to excellent spring water in everyday language, the woman currently understood no other meaning. Noticing he was a stranger without a bucket, she expressed her surprise at his promise. With some mysterious sense, likely due to his extraordinary character, mixed with disbelief, she asked, "Are you greater than our ancestor Jacob, who gave us the well and drank from it himself, along with his children and livestock?"
This may furnish an exemplification of the fact, that the "natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned." The terras of Christianity are mysterious, because its doctrines are misunderstood, and cannot be discerned by him, the "eyes of whose understanding" are beclouded, and whose heart is sensual. How deplorable the effects of sin, which has drawn a veil over the moral perceptions of man; in consequence of which, he cannot see the glories of truth, the charms of Jesus, the value of his soul, and the importance of its redemption! Nothing but the glare of earthly grandeur can affect him, while eternity with all its vast concerns disappears.
This shows that the "natural person doesn't accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; nor can he understand them, because they are spiritually discerned." The teachings of Christianity are mysterious because people misinterpret them and can’t perceive them due to their "clouded understanding" and sensual hearts. It’s heartbreaking to see the effects of sin, which has covered the moral perceptions of humanity; as a result, people can’t see the beauty of truth, the allure of Jesus, the worth of their souls, and the significance of their redemption! Only the shine of worldly wealth seems to impact them, while eternity and all its vast issues fade away.
Though the woman at first manifested considerable animosity, and afterward betrayed great ignorance, Jesus was neither provoked by her prejudices, nor irritated by her misconceptions. We must not unnecessarily wound the unenlightened, nor even the perverse, by reproaches; but aim to win them by kindness and forbearance. O for more resemblance to the "Lamb of God," and more of the temper which the apostle inculcates! "And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient, in meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth; and that they may recover themselves out of the snare of the devil, who are taken captive by him at his will." It would exceedingly conduce to the promotion of this spirit, were we frequently to recollect our own former ignorance and slowness to apprehend the "truth as it is in Jesus;" and the patience we have ourselves experienced, especially from "our Master in heaven." We should also consider, that the best and most permanent impressions are often the most gradual; and he who advances to perfection, goes on from strength to strength. Let us not be unduly discouraged, because of our present ignorance and darkness of mind: but pursuing our inquiries with a humble and teachable disposition, we may hope by copious supplies from the Source of wisdom, to increase our knowledge, and enlarge our capacities.
Though the woman initially showed a lot of hostility and later revealed her ignorance, Jesus wasn't angered by her biases or frustrated by her misunderstandings. We shouldn’t unnecessarily hurt those who are unenlightened or even those who are difficult, but rather aim to win them over with kindness and patience. Oh, how we should strive to be more like the "Lamb of God" and embody the attitude that the apostle teaches! "And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient, in meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God perhaps will give them repentance to acknowledge the truth; and that they may recover themselves out of the snare of the devil, who are taken captive by him at his will." It would greatly help promote this spirit if we often remembered our own past ignorance and slow understanding of the "truth as it is in Jesus," and the patience we’ve received, especially from "our Master in heaven." We should also keep in mind that the most profound and lasting impressions often come gradually, and those who move towards perfection grow from strength to strength. Let’s not be overly discouraged by our current ignorance and mental fog; instead, by approaching our inquiries with a humble and teachable spirit, we can hope to increase our understanding and expand our capacities through abundant support from the Source of wisdom.
It appears rather surprising, that instead of questioning the pretentions of Christ, this woman did not at once solicit a fulfilment of his promise, and "draw water from the wells of salvation;" but her method of proceeding is illustrative of a very common case. Religious inquirers are full of doubts and prejudices; for though Jesus invites them to participate the blessings he so liberally dispenses, they imagine, falsely imagine, that some previous qualification is requisite to justify their approach. "Can such a sinner be saved? Am I indeed invited--after all my sins and broken vows? I know not whether I shall be accepted, for what claim have I upon his mercy?"
It’s quite surprising that instead of questioning Christ’s claims, this woman didn’t immediately ask for him to fulfill his promise and "draw water from the wells of salvation." Her approach reflects a very common situation. People searching for religious truth are often filled with doubts and biases; even though Jesus invites them to enjoy the blessings he generously offers, they mistakenly believe that some kind of prerequisite is needed to justify their coming forward. "Can someone like me ever be saved? Am I really invited after all my sins and broken promises? I don’t know if I will be accepted, since what right do I have to his mercy?"
Yet the Saviour still invites--still promises--still encourages--still instructs--and will not let the weakest inquirer go, but guides his feet into the way of peace.
Yet the Savior still invites—still promises—still encourages—still instructs—and won’t let the weakest seeker go, but guides their steps into the path of peace.
"Whosoever," said he to the woman, "whosoever drinketh of this water shall thirst again; but whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him, shall never thirst: but the water that I shall give him, shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life." The allusion is unquestionably to that principle in the heart which is of divine implantation, and which however various its names, and diversified its operations, is uniform in its nature and origin. Sometimes it is represented by the cause, and sometimes the effect. It is the "Spirit given to them that ask him," with regard to agency; it is grace, in point of character; and it is holiness or practical religion, in reference to its outward influence. Jesus Christ beautifully describes this principle in his metaphorical addresses to the woman of Samaria, by an allusion to the thirst which the water of life assuages, the inexhaustible consolation it imparts, as a "well of water;" and the perpetual and perfect blessedness with which it is connected, as "springing up into everlasting life."
"Whoever," he said to the woman, "whoever drinks this water will be thirsty again; but whoever drinks the water I give him will never be thirsty: the water I give him will become in him a well of water springing up to everlasting life." The reference is undoubtedly to that principle in the heart that is divinely implanted, which, regardless of its various names and different functions, is consistent in its nature and origin. Sometimes it is seen as the cause, and sometimes the effect. It is the "Spirit given to those who ask him," in terms of agency; it is grace, in terms of character; and it is holiness or practical religion, in relation to its external impact. Jesus Christ beautifully describes this principle in his metaphorical conversation with the woman of Samaria, referencing the thirst that the water of life satisfies, the endless comfort it brings, as a "well of water;" and the ongoing and complete happiness it is associated with, as "springing up into everlasting life."
Thirstis one of the most powerful propensities of human nature, and is therefore adapted to represent the intensity of that desire with which mankind seek the wealth, the honours, and the pleasures of the world: and though "he that loveth silver shall not be satisfied with silver; nor he that loveth abundance with increase;" the appetite is still insatiable, and the pursuit continued. When under the influence of violent thirst, it is not unusual for persons to avail themselves of the first supply, however unwholesome, and eagerly to drink even of a filthy stream; with similar impatience and satisfaction, the "carnal mind" indulges in its sensualities, seizing forbidden, and contented with polluting joys. But the grace of God in the heart is distinguished for its purifying influence: it cleanses the spirit from guilt--sanctifies it by the "washing of regeneration," and imparts a new desire, a heavenly thirst, a holy ardour for spiritual communications; so that "as the hart pants after the water-brooks, so panteth the soul after God."
Thirst is one of the strongest instincts of human nature, which makes it a fitting representation of the intense desire with which people pursue wealth, honor, and pleasures in life. And even though "those who love silver will never be satisfied with silver; nor will those who love abundance be satisfied with more," the craving remains unquenchable, and the chase continues. When overwhelmed by intense thirst, it’s common for people to grab the first drink available, no matter how unhealthy, and eagerly sip even from a dirty stream; in a similar way, the "carnal mind" indulges in its desires, embracing forbidden pleasures and being content with impure joys. However, the grace of God in the heart is known for its purifying effect: it cleanses the spirit from guilt, sanctifies it through the "washing of regeneration," and instills a new desire, a heavenly thirst, a holy passion for spiritual connection; so that "as the deer longs for streams of water, so my soul longs for God."
This woman had a considerable distance to go in order to procure the water with which it was needful to supply the necessities of her household; and when arrived at the spot, it was a laborious service to draw from the well, and return laden into the city. Our Saviour intimates, on the contrary, the ease with which his divine blessings were attainable, as well as their unfailing abundance. There is imparted to every applicant a fund of peace, in consequence of which "a good man is satisfied from himself." Religion furnishes consolations of a nature precisely adapted to our necessities as fallen and miserable creatures; and it affords them in circumstances, when it is obvious that no other resource remains. The supplies of this world resemble the casual streamlets of winter, cold, and soon exhausted, or lost in evaporation beneath the returning beam of spring: but amidst the vicissitudes of life, and in the hour of dissolution, religion has consolations which never fail. The river of a Christian's consolation runs throughout the wilderness of time, nor stays in its course till it expands into the boundless and fathomless ocean of eternal blessedness.
This woman had a long way to go to get the water needed to support her household. When she reached the spot, pulling water from the well and returning to the city with her load was hard work. In contrast, our Savior shows how easy it is to access His divine blessings, which are always abundant. Everyone who asks receives a sense of peace, and because of this, "a good man is satisfied from himself." Religion offers comfort that is perfectly suited to our needs as fallen and struggling beings, especially in times when it’s clear there’s no other help available. The resources of this world are like the fleeting streams of winter—cold and quickly drained or evaporating under the returning warmth of spring. But amid life’s ups and downs, and in moments of crisis, religion provides never-failing comfort. The river of a Christian's solace flows through the wilderness of time and doesn't stop until it merges into the endless and deep ocean of eternal happiness.
At length, the woman in question is induced to make the request which we wonder she did not at first present; though still she misapprehends the meaning of her divine Teacher, however plain his sentiment may now appear to us; in consequence of which, he condescended to adopt another mode of conveying instruction to her mind. He had excited her attention, he now proceeds to address her conscience.
At last, the woman is prompted to make the request that we wonder she didn’t bring up at first; yet she still misunderstands what her divine Teacher means, no matter how clear his message seems to us now. Because of this, he chose to take a different approach to teach her. He had captured her attention, and now he moves on to address her conscience.
We must not overlook the circumstance that Christ was "wearied with his journey;" but he was not wearied with his work--well doing. If he had now remained silent, it would not have been wonderful; or if, intending to disclose his character to this woman, and by her means to the Samaritans, he had smitten her conscience, removed her prejudices, enlightened her mind, and won her affections, as we know he could have done, in a moment--as when he said to Matthew, "Follow me," and immediately "he left all"--or as when he spake from the clouds with irresistible effect to Saul;--we should not have been astonished that he spared his words, while we must have admired the mighty operation of his grace. But lo! he entered into a long conversation, though in a weary hour, and took the utmost pains to teach her. We have here an example for our imitation. Ought not we to be patient and laborious? Ought not we to recollect the value of the soul, and strive "in season and out of season" to win it, knowing "he that converteth the sinner from the error of his way shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of sins?" "The servant of the Lord must not strive," nor despond; lest consulting his own advantage, he prejudice the divine service; but he must forget his infirmities, and pursue his work.
We can't ignore the fact that Christ was "tired from his journey," but he wasn't tired from his work—doing good. If he had chosen to stay silent, it wouldn't have been surprising; or if he had wanted to reveal his identity to this woman and through her to the Samaritans, he could have easily touched her conscience, removed her biases, enlightened her mind, and gained her affection, as we know he could do in a moment—like when he told Matthew, "Follow me," and right away "he left everything"—or when he spoke from the clouds with undeniable power to Saul; we wouldn’t have been astonished if he had kept his words to a minimum, even though we would have admired the incredible power of his grace. But instead, he engaged in a long conversation, even when he was tired, and made every effort to teach her. We have an example to follow here. Shouldn't we be patient and diligent? Shouldn't we remember the value of a soul and work "in season and out of season" to save it, knowing that "he who turns a sinner from the error of their ways will save a soul from death and cover a multitude of sins?" "The servant of the Lord must not fight," nor lose hope; rather, focusing on his own interests could hinder divine service, but he must forget his weaknesses and continue his work.
To the request, "Sir, give me this water," Jesus does not appear to have returned any direct answer, but said, "Go, call thy husband, and come hither." The reply was, in one view, direct, and he began instantly to communicate the "living water;" for the discourse upon which he entered, though at a superficial glance it may appear foreign to the immediate purpose of her request, and might seem to point her to a different subject, was really intended to produce deep and salutary convictions of sin, and such as were requisite in order to her reception of the living water of spiritual consolation. Nothing in reality could display both the wisdom and goodness of the great Teacher in a more striking manner, than this proceeding. In effect, he takes her by the hand, conducts her through the narrow path of conviction and penetential acknowledgment, to that fountain which has supplied millions, and is still inexhaustible; and by whatever mysterious methods he brings his people to himself and to their final rest, it will ultimately be found the right way to the city of habitation. As the woman did not comprehend his metaphorical language, he determined to disclose his prophetic character. "Jesus saith unto her, Go, call thy husband, and come hither. The woman answered and said, I have no husband. Jesus said unto her, Thou hast well said, I have no husband: for thou hast had five husbands; and he whom thou now hast is not thy husband: in that saidst thou truly." By divine inspiration, an ordinary prophet might be supposed to have been made acquainted with the woman's character and domestic circumstances; but we must contemplate the Saviour on this occasion as supporting his claim to a higher distinction, such as none of them could possess. It is a solemn consideration that we are perpetually inspected by those "eyes which are upon the ways of man," and by him who seeth all his goings, his most retired moments, most secret sins, most private affairs, and most latent thoughts. Even though we should not live in that excess of sensuality which existed in this case, how important is the apostolic entreaty, to "abstain from fleshly lusts;" and how just the assurance, "they war against the soul!"
To the request, "Sir, give me this water," Jesus didn’t really provide a direct answer but said, "Go, call your husband, and come here." His reply, in one way, was straightforward, and he immediately started to share the "living water." Although his discussion might seem unrelated to her request at first glance, it was actually meant to create profound and healthy realizations about sin, which were necessary for her to receive the spiritual comfort of the "living water." Nothing could show the wisdom and goodness of the great Teacher more clearly than this approach. Essentially, he guides her through the narrow path of realization and repentance to that fountain that has satisfied millions and remains endless; whatever mysterious ways he uses to bring people to himself and their ultimate peace, it will ultimately be found to be the right way to the city of habitation. Since the woman didn’t understand his metaphorical language, he decided to reveal his prophetic nature. "Jesus said to her, Go, call your husband, and come here." The woman replied, "I have no husband." Jesus said to her, "You’ve answered correctly, I have no husband; for you’ve had five husbands, and the one you have now isn’t your husband: in that, you spoke truthfully." While it could be assumed that an ordinary prophet might have known about the woman's life and circumstances through divine inspiration, we must see the Savior here as asserting his claim to a higher distinction that none of them could hold. It's a sobering thought that we are constantly observed by those "eyes which are on the ways of man," and by him who sees all our actions, our most private moments, hidden sins, secret affairs, and deepest thoughts. Even if we don’t engage in the same level of indulgence as this woman, the apostolic urge to "abstain from fleshly lusts" is significant; and the warning that "they war against the soul!" is entirely justified.
At length the woman's eyes were opened; she had a glimpse of the glory of her divine Instructer through the influence of that grace which is effectual in its operations, and imparts those perceptions which cannot be otherwise possessed. Happy for us if we have been led to discern the exalted character and excellencies of the Son of God! "Sir," said she, "I perceive that thou art a prophet;" and availing herself of the present favourable opportunity, she proposes a question much and violently agitated between the Jews and Samaritans. When the passions are inflamed by controversial discussion, how apt are we to be mislead by the opinions of men rather than guided by the oppointments of God; and how frequently convenience, instead of conscience, dictates the conduct of religious professors! The Samaritan woman pleads the authority of the fathers for worshipping at mount Gerizzim rather than repairing to Jerusalem. This has frequently proved a source of error; and the history of mankind will furnish ample evidence, that in departing from Scripture, the only "sure word of prophecy," we shall inevitably wander into an endless labyrinth of mistake, and be lost amidst the intricacies of delusion.
At last, the woman's eyes were opened; she caught a glimpse of the glory of her divine Teacher through the influence of that grace which is effective in its workings, giving her insights that can't be gained any other way. How fortunate we are if we have been led to recognize the noble character and qualities of the Son of God! "Sir," she said, "I see that you are a prophet;" and taking advantage of the moment, she asks a question that has caused much debate between the Jews and Samaritans. When emotions run high during heated discussions, how easy it is for us to be swayed by people's opinions instead of being guided by God's truths; and how often does convenience, rather than conscience, shape the actions of those who profess their faith! The Samaritan woman argues for the authority of the ancestors in worshipping at Mount Gerizzim instead of going to Jerusalem. This has often led to mistakes; history shows us that when we stray from Scripture, the only "sure word of prophecy," we will inevitably get lost in a confusing maze of errors and be trapped in a web of deception.
Our Lord intimates the improper proceedings of the Samaritans in consequence of being thus misled by prejudice and by the example of others, and shows that Jerusalem was certainly the ancient place of appointed worship, and the Jews the depositaries of celestial wisdom. From that illustrious people issued the word of the Lord which contained the doctrine of salvation, which descended like the dew from heaven, and was calculated to diffuse spiritual fertility through the earth, and impart universal joy. "Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father. Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship, for salvation is of the Jews. But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in Spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. God is a spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth." In this passage Jesus points out the superior nature of the worship which was now required, and which he was about to introduce to the world. In the former controversy the Jews were certainly right; but the designs of mercy being now accomplished in the mission of the Son of God, and the "fulness of time being come," it was determined to spread the blessings of the "everlasting Gospel" to the widest possible extent, and to render, in honour of the mediation of Christ, the whole earth an universal temple, in which the sacrifice of humble and contrite hearts should be always acceptable.
Our Lord points out the wrong actions of the Samaritans because they were misguided by prejudice and the example of others. He makes it clear that Jerusalem has always been the designated place of worship, and the Jews hold the key to divine knowledge. From that remarkable people came the word of the Lord, which carried the message of salvation, falling like dew from heaven, meant to spread spiritual growth across the earth and bring universal joy. "Woman, believe me, the time is coming when you will worship the Father neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem. You worship what you do not know; we worship what we do know, for salvation comes from the Jews. But the time is coming, and is already here, when true worshippers will worship the Father in Spirit and in truth, for the Father seeks such people to worship Him. God is Spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in Spirit and in truth." In this passage, Jesus highlights the higher form of worship that is now needed and that He is about to bring to the world. In the previous debate, the Jews were definitely correct; however, now that the plans of mercy are fulfilled through the mission of the Son of God and the "fullness of time has come," it was decided to spread the blessings of the "everlasting Gospel" as widely as possible, turning the entire world into a universal temple where the sacrifices of humble and contrite hearts are always welcome.
Two great effects were produced by the introduction of the Christian dispensation. The one respected the mode of worship. It was now no longer to be ceremonial, but spiritual; it was no longer to be conducted in types and shadows, but in truth. In compassion to human infirmity, numerous ceremonies were originally appointed, to impress awe, and to fill the mind of man with a sense of the majesty of God. The conceptions of a fallen creature being too grovelling at first to comprehend the invisible realities of religion, a system of service was admitted which tended to produce general impressions by an appeal to the external senses, and thus slowly to insinuate sublimer facts, and prepare for more noble manifestations; but when "the Lord came to his temple," and made "the place of his feet glorious," darkness vanished, truth shone with effulgent brightness, and simplicity rose to the dominion which ceremony and complexity had assumed: at his presence the new creation smiled, and the Lord of the universe again descended to pronounce upon another series of wonderful works, that "all was very good."
Two major effects came about with the introduction of the Christian faith. The first was about the mode of worship. It was no longer to be ceremonial, but spiritual; it was not to be done in types and shadows, but in truth. Out of compassion for human weakness, many ceremonies were initially established to create awe and fill people's minds with a sense of God's majesty. Since the understanding of a fallen being was initially too low to grasp the invisible truths of religion, a system of service was introduced that aimed to create general impressions through sensory experiences, gradually leading to deeper truths and preparing for more profound revelations. But when "the Lord came to his temple" and made "the place of his feet glorious," darkness disappeared, and truth shone brightly. Simplicity took over where ceremony and complexity had ruled; in His presence, the new creation rejoiced, and the Lord of the universe came down once again to declare about another series of amazing works that "all was very good."
Another effect resulting from the introduction of the Christian age concerned the variety and number of worshippers. The limitations which had hitherto prevailed in communicating truth to the world were to be superseded; for, though the commissioned apostles were to deliver their message "to the Jew first," they were expressly directed to convey it "also to the Gentiles." How calculated is this precedure to allay animosities and unite hearts! and what a motive is here presented to us to dismiss every petulant and revengeful disposition from the Christian sanctuary, remembering that whether Jew or Gentile, rich or poor, bond or free, every one is accepted of God only as he is a SPIRITUAL WORSHIPPER!
Another effect of the start of the Christian era related to the variety and number of worshippers. The restrictions that had previously limited the spread of truth to the world were about to change; for, even though the apostles were to share their message "to the Jew first," they were specifically instructed to convey it "also to the Gentiles." How well-suited is this approach to calm hostilities and bring people together! And what a powerful incentive this gives us to let go of any spiteful or vengeful feelings in the Christian community, remembering that whether Jew or Gentile, rich or poor, slave or free, everyone is accepted by God only as they are a SPIRITUAL WORSHIPPER!
As "God is a spirit," witnessing our movements and acquainted with our thoughts at all times and in every place, we should often consecrate our moments to his service. In the hour of seclusion and retirement, as well as on public occasions and in religious assemblies, it becomes us to direct our meditations to him by whom we are encircled. Let us contemplate GOD, and feel his awful presence. He is on heaven and on earth; his eyes behold us amidst the shades of midnight as well as in the brightest noon of day; he pervades all space, is in all time, above all creatures, before all being, and through all eternity. "Canst thou by searching find out God? canst thou find out the Almighty unto perfection?"
As "God is a spirit," observing our actions and knowing our thoughts at all times and everywhere, we should often dedicate our moments to His service. In times of solitude and reflection, as well as during public events and religious gatherings, we should turn our thoughts to Him who surrounds us. Let’s think about God and feel His awesome presence. He is in heaven and on earth; His eyes see us in the darkness of midnight as well as in the bright noon of day; He fills all space, exists in all time, is above all creatures, before all beings, and throughout all eternity. "Can you by searching find out God? Can you find out the Almighty to perfection?"
At the period of this conversation at Jacob's well, a very general expectation of the speedy appearance of the Messiah was prevalent, and the woman was aware of the reference in the words, "The hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father;" although at present "her eyes were holden," that she did not know him through the concealment of his mean attire and unstately solitariness. This, however, was wisely planned; and while it tended to cast contempt on worldly glory, it enabled him to become a fellow-sufferer with his people, and to cherish a holy familiarity with his disciples. Hence we find him not in palaces, but in cottages--on the highways of common resort--healing the sick at the pool of Bethesda, conversing with a poor woman at Jacob's well, and in other similar situations: and never shall we be worthy to bear his name till we imitate his conduct. "The woman saith unto him, I know that Messias cometh, which is called Christ: when he is come, he will tell us all things. Jesus saith unto her, I that speak unto thee am he." This was the point to which all his discourse was directed, this the revelation he intended from the first to disclose; but how wisely was it delayed! Such an assertion at the commencement of the conversation would have kindled animosity or excited ridicule; but that mind which was originally so prejudiced and so resentful, is brought to receive the most glorious and spiritual discovery. If we wonder at her ignorance, and lament her prejudices previously to this declaration, how much more criminal would she have now been had she persisted in unbelief! Yet, alas, how often is Christ proclaimed, all his glories revealed, and all his truth exhibited, by the ministry of the Gospel, and nevertheless rejected!
At the time of this conversation at Jacob's well, there was a widespread expectation of the Messiah's imminent arrival, and the woman recognized the reference in the phrase, "The hour is coming, and now is, when the true worshippers will worship the Father." However, "her eyes were holden," meaning she didn’t recognize him because of his humble appearance and solitary presence. This was intentional; it not only looked down on worldly glory but also allowed him to share in the struggles of his people and to build a close relationship with his disciples. Therefore, we find him not in palaces but in humble homes—on the common roads—healing the sick at the pool of Bethesda, talking to a poor woman at Jacob's well, and in other similar situations. We will never be worthy to bear his name until we follow his example. "The woman said to him, I know that the Messiah is coming, who is called Christ: when he comes, he will explain everything to us." Jesus replied, "I who speak to you am he." This was the main point of his conversation and the revelation he intended to share from the beginning, but it was wisely held back. Such a declaration at the start would have sparked hostility or mockery; instead, a mind that was initially so biased and angry is now open to receive this incredible and spiritual truth. If we are surprised by her ignorance and regret her biases before this moment, how much more wrong would she have been if she had continued in disbelief! Yet, sadly, how often is Christ proclaimed, all his glory revealed, and all his truth displayed through the Gospel, yet still rejected!
Upon Christ's explanation of his true character, the Samaritan woman immediately left her water-pot, and went into the city, to announce her discoveries to the neighbourhood, and invite her fellow citizens to the Messiah. Glowing with zeal for others, she said, "Come, see a man which told me all things that ever I did: is not this the Christ?" And the historian records the success of her efforts; for "they went out of the city, and came unto him;" and "many of the Samaritans of that city believed on him." This induced them to solicit his continuance for some time amongst them, "and he abode there two days. And many more believed because of his own word; and said unto the woman, Now we believe, not because of thy saying: for we have heard him ourselves, and know that this is indeed the Christ, the Saviour of the world."
Upon Christ's explanation of who He truly was, the Samaritan woman immediately left her water jar and went into the town to share her discoveries with the neighbors and invite her fellow citizens to meet the Messiah. Filled with enthusiasm for others, she said, "Come, see a man who told me everything I've ever done: isn't this the Christ?" The historian notes the success of her efforts; for "they went out of the town and came to him;" and "many of the Samaritans of that town believed in him." This led them to ask him to stay with them for a while, "and he stayed there two days. And many more believed because of his own words; and they said to the woman, 'Now we believe, not because of what you said; for we have heard him ourselves and know that this is indeed the Christ, the Savior of the world.'"
Gratitude becomes us in reflecting upon that diversity of means which divine wisdom uses to promote the circulation of his truth, and "win souls to Christ." The greatest beings are at his control, and are sometimes commissioned to visit the "heirs of salvation"--"Bless the Lord, ye his angels, that excel in strength, that do his commandments, hearkening unto the voice of his word;" while on other occasions he employs the most unlikely agents, or the feeblest instrumentality, to "do his pleasure." He can from the very stones "raise up children unto Abraham," convert an infuriated persecutor into an "apostle of the Gentiles," or change a Samaritan into a Christian, an infidel Gentile into a child of Abraham by faith, and a woman coming casually to draw water for her household, into an instrument of dispensing the living streams of salvation to a perishing vicinity.
Gratitude is fitting as we reflect on the various ways that divine wisdom works to share his truth and "win souls to Christ." The greatest beings are at his command and are sometimes sent to reach the "heirs of salvation" — "Bless the Lord, you his angels, who excel in strength, who carry out his commandments, listening to the voice of his word;" while at other times, he uses the most unexpected agents or the weakest means to "do his will." He can take stones and "raise up children unto Abraham," turn a fierce persecutor into an "apostle of the Gentiles," change a Samaritan into a Christian, transform an infidel Gentile into a child of Abraham by faith, and even change a woman coming to draw water for her household into a messenger of the life-giving streams of salvation for a suffering community.
The early part of the narrative before us, is sufficient to show, that however slow persons whom we have an opportunity of instructing in religious truth may seem in understanding, or however reluctant to obey it, we ought never either to despair of success, or be weary of repeating our instruction. "I charge thee," says Paul in addressing Timothy, "before God and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom; preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all long-suffering and doctrine." Who can tell the favoured period? Who can calculate the extent of the benefit conferred when one sinner is "converted from the error of his ways?" And who would not rejoice at the thought of having his final hour cheered by the recollection of having been the means of letting in the light of an eternal day even upon an individual of the human race, who was once sitting in the darkness of spiritual delusion, and pining in the dungeon of guilt, and misery, and helplessness?
The early part of the story we have here is enough to show that, no matter how slow the people we get to instruct in religious truth may seem to understand, or how reluctant they are to follow it, we should never give up hope for success or get tired of repeating our lessons. "I charge you," says Paul when speaking to Timothy, "before God and the Lord Jesus Christ, who will judge the living and the dead at his coming and his kingdom; preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; correct, rebuke, and encourage with all patience and teaching." Who can predict the fortunate moment? Who can measure the impact when one sinner is "turned from the error of their ways?" And who wouldn't be glad at the thought of having their last moments uplifted by the memory of having brought the light of eternal life to at least one person who was once trapped in the darkness of spiritual confusion, suffering in the prison of guilt and misery, and feeling powerless?
Many things in religion, which we at present misunderstand, may probably become intelligible in the course of future experience, and a great variety of interesting truths now unknown will certainly be revealed in another world. The woman of Samaria could not for a considerable time comprehend the metaphorical allusions of Christ; but when she had "found the Messiah," she was no longer at a loss to ascertain the signification of the stranger's assurance, that he could have given her, had she requested it, "living water." The disclosure of one fact, illustrated another, and in spiritual knowledge and attainment she went on doubtless with a rapidity proportioned to her extraordinary advantages.
Many aspects of religion that we misunderstand now may become clear over time through future experiences, and many fascinating truths that are unknown to us will definitely be revealed in another world. The Samaritan woman took a while to grasp the metaphorical references Christ made; however, once she had "found the Messiah," she no longer struggled to understand the meaning behind the stranger's statement that he could give her "living water" if she asked for it. The revelation of one fact clarified another, and in her spiritual growth and knowledge, she likely progressed quickly due to her unique opportunities.
With what deep interest, at every subsequent period of her life, would this woman recollect the conversation at Jacob's well! Never, surely, would she repair again to that spot, without presenting to her imagination the image of Jesus sitting there, like a weary traveller, asking for water to refresh his pilgrimage, incidentally adverting to topics of supreme importance, addressing her conscience, and gradually unveiling his character to her view--first as a prophet, then as the Messiah of the Jews, and the glory of the Gentiles! Never could she forget that wonderful morning--a morning which shone with such glory in the annals of her existence, and was destined to occupy a conspicuous place in the recollections of eternity! And it is our privilege, as well as duty, to remember the place of our spiritual birth, the instructer of our infant piety, the guide of our religious inquiries, and all "the way in which the Lord our God has led us in the wilderness." Experience will rivet our affections to every circumstance; life will derive a charm, in many of its future years, from such welcome reflections; and memory will not discard, amidst the ineffable joys of paradise, the well--the stranger--the converse--the whole scene of those first impressions, which ripened into religion and were the seeds of immortality.
With such deep interest, at every stage of her life, this woman would remember the conversation at Jacob's well! She would never return to that spot without picturing Jesus sitting there like a tired traveler, asking for water to cool his journey, casually bringing up topics of great importance, speaking to her conscience, and slowly revealing his true nature to her—first as a prophet, then as the Messiah of the Jews and the glory of the Gentiles! She could never forget that amazing morning—it shone brightly in her life and was destined to hold a significant place in the memories of eternity! It is our privilege and duty to remember the place of our spiritual rebirth, the teacher of our early faith, the guide for our religious questions, and all the ways in which the Lord our God has led us through the wilderness. Experience will lock our affections to every detail; life will gain charm in many of its future years from such treasured memories; and memory will not forget, amid the unimaginable joys of paradise, the well—the stranger—the conversation—the entire scene of those first impressions that blossomed into faith and became the seeds of eternity.
In a sense more important than that in which the subject of this narrative originally employed the words, each reader may feel encouraged to address the Saviour, "Give me this water, that I thirst not." Holy prophets concur with the evangelical publishers of "glad tidings," in urging you to partake of the heavenly supply, which is dispensed with perfect freeness, and in undiminishing abundance. "Ho, everyone that thirsteth, come ye to the waters, and he that hath no money; come ye, buy, and eat; yea, come, buy wine and milk without money and without price."
In a way even deeper than the original intent of the words, every reader may feel inspired to ask the Savior, "Give me this water so I won't be thirsty." Holy prophets agree with the gospel messengers spreading "good news," urging you to take part in the heavenly gift, which is offered freely and in endless supply. "Hey, everyone who is thirsty, come to the waters; and whoever doesn’t have money, come and buy and eat; yes, come, buy wine and milk without money and without cost."
The Woman Who Was a Sinner.
Chapter V.
Jesus and John contrasted--the former goes to dine at the House of a Pharisee--a notorious Woman introduces herself, and weeps at his Feet--Remarks on true Repentance and Faith, as exemplified in her Conduct--Surmises of Simon the Pharisee--the Answer of Jesus--the Woman assured of Forgiveness--Instructions deducible from the Parable.
Jesus and John are contrasted—Jesus goes to dinner at a Pharisee's house— a well-known woman arrives, weeping at his feet—comments on true repentance and faith as shown by her actions—Simon the Pharisee’s thoughts—Jesus’ response—the woman assured of forgiveness—lessons to be learned from the parable.
There was a remarkable dissimilarity between Christ and his celebrated precursor. The latter was unbending in his manners, austere in his mode of living, and abrupt in his public discourses: in fact, John was distinguished by all those qualities of a great reformer, which fitted him for the service assigned him by Providence; zealous, eloquent, intrepid, inconsiderate of himself, and resolutely exposing the vices of those around him, to whom he pointed out "a more excellent way." The wildness of the wilderness seemed to accord with the singularity of his character; and the rocky standing from which he might probably often address his auditors, was well adapted to the design of his preaching, and the mode of his appearance. His Divine Master gave ample testimony to his excellence--"What went ye out for to see? a prophet? Yea, I say unto you, and more than a prophet. For this is he of whom it is written, Behold, I send my messenger before thy face, which shall prepare thy way before thee. Verily I say unto you, Among them that are born of women, there has not arisen a greater than John the Baptist."
There was a striking difference between Christ and his famous predecessor. John was rigid in his behavior, strict in his lifestyle, and blunt in his speeches: he was characterized by all the traits of a great reformer, making him suited for the role given to him by Providence; passionate, articulate, fearless, selfless, and determined to expose the flaws of those around him, guiding them towards "a better way." The wildness of the wilderness seemed to reflect his unique character; and the rocky spot from which he often spoke to his audience was perfectly suited to his preaching style and appearance. His Divine Master gave ample praise for his greatness—"What did you go out to see? A prophet? Yes, I tell you, and more than a prophet. For this is he of whom it is written, Behold, I send my messenger before your face, who will prepare your way before you. Truly I say to you, among those born of women, there has not risen a greater than John the Baptist."
But the character of the "Son of man" differed in many respects from that of his forerunner. He was familiar, affable, and ready to associate with others; he assumed no austerity of manners, and no reserve of behaviour. The cast of his public preaching, too, was of a milder and more winning strain, suited to his character as the image of the God who is love, and adapted to the merciful nature of that dispensation which he came to introduce.
But the character of the "Son of man" was quite different from that of his predecessor. He was friendly, approachable, and eager to connect with others; he showed no strictness in his demeanor and no aloofness in his behavior. His public preaching also had a gentler and more charming tone, reflecting his role as the embodiment of the God who is love, and fitting the compassionate nature of the message he came to share.
It was this diversity which excited the malignant revilings of the Jews, who said of John, "he hath a devil;" and of Christ, "Behold a man gluttonous, and a wine-bibber, a friend of publicans and sinners:" but the success of the means has fully justified the use of them, as the prescriptions of the physician are justified by the restoration of health to the diseased, and the mode adopted by the agriculturist in cultivating his soil is effectually vindicated by its fertility. God bestows upon his church a diversity of gifts, and upon men a variety of qualities, that different stations may be occupied to the best advantage, and his cause promoted in the most effectual manner. The formation of suitable instruments to accomplish his purposes, is one of those arrangements of Providence which we can never sufficiently admire. Whatever peculiarities exist, they are all made to concur to the same end, and are all regulated by the same influence: the "gifts" and the "operations" are diverse, but "it is the same God which worketh all in all."
It was this diversity that stirred up the harsh criticisms from the Jews, who said of John, "he has a demon;" and of Christ, "Look, a man who is a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners:" but the success of these methods has fully justified their use, just as a doctor's treatments are justified by restoring health to patients, and the strategies used by farmers in cultivating their land are validated by its productivity. God gives his church a variety of gifts, and people different qualities, so that various roles can be filled effectively, and his mission can be advanced in the best way. The creation of suitable tools to achieve his aims is one of those aspects of Providence that we can never admire enough. Whatever unique traits there are, they all work together toward the same goal, and are all guided by the same force: the "gifts" and the "activities" are varied, but "it is the same God who works in all."
Happily for mankind, there was a sense in which a part of the accusation preferred against Jesus Christ held true. He was indeed "a friend of publicans and sinners"--if he had not been, what would have been the situation of a Matthew, whom he called from the receipt of custom to "follow him;" or of a Zaccheus, whom he addressed in the sycamore tree, and to whose house he "that day" conveyed "salvation;" or of a Bartimeus, "blind and sitting by the highway-side, begging," whose eyes he opened, and to whose mind he imparted faith? If he had not been a "friend of publicans and sinners" the songs of descending spirits would never have charmed the shepherds of Bethlehem--a church would never have been formed on earth and ultimately taken to heaven--the mansions of eternity would never have been peopled by the children of transgression--the hymns of human gratitude would never have mingled with the hallelujahs of the blessed--nor would the sacred writings have contained such a history as that before us of the penitent sinner.
Luckily for humanity, there’s a way in which part of the accusation against Jesus Christ was true. He really was "a friend of tax collectors and sinners"—if he hadn’t been, what would have happened to Matthew, whom he called from collecting taxes to "follow him;" or to Zaccheus, whom he spoke to while he was in the sycamore tree, and to whose house he brought "salvation" "that day;" or to Bartimaeus, "blind and sitting by the roadside, begging," whose sight he restored, and to whose heart he gave faith? If he hadn’t been a "friend of tax collectors and sinners," the songs of heavenly spirits would never have delighted the shepherds of Bethlehem—there would have been no church established on earth to eventually reach heaven—the homes of eternity would never have been filled with the children of wrongdoers—the songs of human gratitude would never have blended with the praises of the blessed—nor would the sacred texts have included such a story as the one we have here about the repentant sinner.
It is introduced by an account of one of the Pharisees having solicited the company of Jesus to dinner, and of his having accepted his invitation. The Pharisees were amongst his bitterest enemies, and yet here is one who courteously introduces him into his house. He might have been affected by his discourses or miracles; and it is pleasing to recollect, that divine grace is not limited in its operations to one community, class, or age, but peoples the heavenly world by the redemption of sinners of every rank in life, every period of time, every degree of moral corruption, and every nation of the globe.
It starts with a story about one of the Pharisees inviting Jesus to dinner, and Jesus accepting the invitation. The Pharisees were some of his fiercest opponents, yet here’s one who graciously welcomes him into his home. He may have been influenced by Jesus' teachings or miracles; it’s nice to remember that divine grace isn’t confined to a single group, class, or era, but instead fills the heavenly realm through the redemption of sinners from all walks of life, all times, all levels of moral failure, and all nations around the world.
Our Saviour's visit to the Pharisee is related for the sake of the incident and discourse with which it was connected, and which are given in the following words: Behold, a woman in the city, which was a sinner, when she knew that Jesus sat at meat in the Pharisee's house, brought an alabaster box of ointment, and stood at his feet behind him weeping, and began to wash his feet with tears, and did wipe them with the hairs of her head, and kissed his feet, and anointed them with the ointment. Now when the Pharisee which had bidden him saw it, he spake within himself, saying, This man, if he were a prophet, would have known who and what manner of woman this is that toucheth him: for she is a sinner. And Jesus answering, said unto him, Simon, I have somewhat to say unto thee. And he saith, Master, say on. There was a certain creditor which had two debtors; the one owed five hundred pence, and the other fifty. And when they had nothing to pay, he frankly forgave them both. Tell me, therefore, which of them will love him most? Simon answered and said, I suppose that he to whom he forgave most. And he said unto him, Thou hast rightly judged. And he turned to the woman, and said unto Simon, seest thou this woman? I entered into thine house, thou gavest me no water for my feet; but she hath washed my feet with tears, and wiped them with the hairs of her head. Thou gavest me no kiss; but this woman, since the time I came in, hath not ceased to kiss my feet. My head with oil thou didst not anoint; but this woman hath anointed my feet with ointment. Wherefore I say unto thee, her sins, which are many, are forgiven; for she loved much: but to whom little is forgiven, the same loveth little. And he said unto her, Thy sins are forgiven. And they that sat at meat with him began to say within themselves, Who is this that forgiveth sins also? And he said to the woman, "Thy faith hath saved thee: go in peace."
Our Savior's visit to the Pharisee is described for the purpose of the incident and conversation that follow: Look, a woman in the city, who was a sinner, learned that Jesus was eating at the Pharisee's house. She brought an alabaster jar of perfume and stood behind him at his feet, weeping. She began to wash his feet with her tears and wiped them with the hair of her head. She kissed his feet and anointed them with the perfume. When the Pharisee who had invited him saw this, he thought to himself, "If this man were a prophet, he would know who and what kind of woman this is who is touching him; for she is a sinner." Jesus answered him, "Simon, I have something to say to you." He replied, "Teacher, say it." There was a certain creditor who had two debtors; one owed five hundred denarii, and the other fifty. When they couldn't pay him back, he forgave them both. So, tell me, which of them will love him more?" Simon answered, "I suppose the one whom he forgave more." Jesus said to him, "You have judged correctly." Turning to the woman, he said to Simon, "Do you see this woman? I came into your house; you gave me no water for my feet, but she has washed my feet with her tears and wiped them with her hair. You didn’t give me a kiss; but this woman has not stopped kissing my feet since I came in. You didn’t anoint my head with oil, but she has anointed my feet with perfume. Therefore I tell you, her many sins have been forgiven, for she loved much; but the one who is forgiven little loves little." Then he said to her, "Your sins are forgiven." The others at the table began to say among themselves, "Who is this who even forgives sins?" And he said to the woman, "Your faith has saved you; go in peace."
The woman is denominated a sinner, because incontinency was her trade and the means of her subsistence. Her character is branded with merited infamy, but her name is mercifully veiled. She was notorious in the city; and one would have imagined that as it could be no defamation to name her, the sacred historian need not have manifested any scrupulousness upon the point; nevertheless, as justice did not require it, and as it was the writer's purpose rather to record her penitence than to expose her crimes, she is mentioned only in general terms, as a sinner, a woman in the city.
The woman is called a sinner because immorality was her profession and her way of making a living. Her reputation is marked with deserved shame, but her name is compassionately kept hidden. She was well-known in the city; and one might think that since naming her wouldn’t be slanderous, the sacred writer wouldn't need to hesitate on this matter. However, since justice didn’t demand it, and the writer intended to focus on her repentance rather than her wrongdoings, she is referred to only in general terms, as a sinner, a woman in the city.
What compassionate mind can help deploring the immoralities of populous towns and crowded cities! What an illustration of human depravity does it afford, that wherever mankind resort in great multitudes, vice is proportionably varied in its nature, atrocious in its character, and barefaced in its practice--as if it were thought that the numbers who perpetrated wickedness, tended to conceal from the view of Omniscience individual delinquency! It is common to acquire boldness by association; and society, which ought rather to purify the mind, is often the means of its pollution. The facilities for secrecy in sin which exist in considerable places, the incalculable variety of forms in which temptation appears, the force of example operating upon an extensive scale, and enhanced by a thousand tributary streams that pour into the tide of transgression flowing down the streets, concur to involve the inhabitants of populous vicinities in circumstances of great moral danger. Apart from all persuasion or direct influence, the very sight of immoralities is liable to injure that delicate sensibility to wrong which it is of the utmost importance to preserve in a pure and uncontaminated state. The nicely polished mind is susceptible of the breath of impurity; and when it once becomes dim and obscure in its perceptions, it is difficult to restore it. Many have on this account withdrawn into retirement, supposing that they should be able to secure that leisure for devotional exercises which they have believed conducive to religious eminence. But they have forgotten that the human heart is sown with unholy principles, which will spring up in solitude as well as in society; that in avoiding dissipation, they are liable to be narrowed into selfishness; and that the honourable and heroic part which Christianity requires, is not to fly from difficulties, but, "in the grace that is in Christ Jesus," to contend with, and conquer them.
What kind-hearted person can help but mourn the wrongdoings in bustling towns and crowded cities? It’s a clear example of human depravity that wherever people gather in large numbers, vice takes on different forms, becomes more outrageous in its nature, and is unapologetically practiced—as if the sheer number of wrongdoers can hide their individual wrongs from the eyes of God! It’s common to gain courage through association; and society, which should purify the mind, often ends up polluting it. The opportunities for secrecy in wrongdoing in large places, the endless variety of temptations, the influence of examples on such a large scale, along with countless other influences that fuel the flood of transgression on the streets, combine to place the residents of busy areas in serious moral danger. Just the sight of immoral behavior can harm the sensitive awareness of right and wrong, which is crucial to maintain in a pure and untainted state. A finely tuned mind can easily be affected by impurity; and once it becomes dim and unclear, it’s hard to bring it back to clarity. Many have chosen to retreat into solitude, thinking they would find the time for spiritual practices that they believe will lead to religious greatness. But they forget that the human heart is full of sinful tendencies that will emerge in solitude just as they do in society; by avoiding distractions, they risk becoming selfish; and the noble and courageous path that Christianity calls for is not to flee from challenges, but to, “in the grace that is in Christ Jesus,” face them and overcome them.
In the woman whose brief but instructive history is to be reviewed, we see indications of a "repentance that needeth not to be repented of." It is to be traced, in the first place, in the posture she assumed, and the tears she shed. When she found that Jesus was dining in the house of Simon, she went and "stood at his feet behind him weeping." She who had known no shame, but whose unblushing impudence and obtrusive familiarities had so often scandalized the city, now avoids a look, shrinks even from respectful notice, and is overwhelmed with a consciousness of guilt.
In the woman whose brief but insightful story we're looking at, we see signs of a "repentance that doesn't need to be regretted." This can first be seen in the posture she took and the tears she cried. When she learned that Jesus was having dinner at Simon's house, she went and "stood at his feet behind him weeping." She, who had never felt shame and whose boldness and overly familiar behavior had often shocked the city, now avoids making eye contact, shrinks from even respectful attention, and is overwhelmed by her sense of guilt.
This conduct bespeaks the most pungent and unaffected sorrow. Her sins present themselves in array before her mind, and she "abhors herself, and repents in dust and ashes." Though all around was festivity, her heart was sad--she wept as in secret; and those eloquent tears bespoke the Saviour's pity, in a manner more powerful than the most studied language could have done! Those tears were precious in his sight--that silence expressed the depth and sincerity of her grief--and he approved it!
This behavior shows deep, genuine sorrow. Her wrongdoings come to mind, and she "hates herself and repents in dust and ashes." Even with all the celebration around her, her heart was heavy—she cried quietly, and those heartfelt tears spoke of the Savior's compassion in a way that words never could. Those tears were valued by him—her silence conveyed the depth and sincerity of her pain—and he accepted it!
With what pleasure must holy angels have contemplated from their radiant spheres this impressive scene; for "there is joy in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner that repenteth!" The gayeties of life, and the appearances of worldly grandeur, excite no satisfaction in them; they are not attracted by those tinsel shows and glittering nonentities which fill the circle of human vanity, and fire the ardent wishes of mankind; the most splendid titles, the most opulent condition, the most celebrated heroes, pass before them like shadows that haste away, unregretted and in quick succession; but they bend from their thrones of light to witness the sorrows of the meanest penitent, and listen to his secret moanings.
With what joy must holy angels have looked down from their shining realms at this powerful scene; for "there is joy in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner that repents!" The pleasures of life and the appearances of worldly success bring them no satisfaction; they aren’t drawn to those flashy displays and sparkling illusions that fill the realm of human vanity and fuel people's desires. The most impressive titles, the wealthiest conditions, the most famous heroes, pass by them like fleeting shadows, quickly forgotten; yet they lean down from their thrones of light to witness the sorrows of the humblest penitent and hear his quiet laments.
It is to be apprehended that many substitute an external reformation of manners for solid repentance towards God. They lay aside the filthy garments of gross immorality, and invest themselves in the decent attire of correct conduct; but the principle of genuine penitence consists in a just estimate of the perfections of that Being whom we have offended, and of the nature of sin, as violating those obligations which devolve on us as creatures. It is an humbling consideration, that God must perceive the guilt of sin with infinitely greater distinctness than is possible to the most self-examining penitent; and that their number and variety must be perfectly discerned by the eyes of his purity. We are apt to throw them together, as in a confused heap; and instead of realizing them in detail, to contemplate them only in the aggregate and mass, by which their individual atrocity is overlooked.
Many people confuse changing their outward behavior with true repentance towards God. They reject the dirty habits of serious immorality and put on the proper behavior of good conduct. However, true penitence involves a clear understanding of the qualities of the Being we have offended, as well as the nature of sin, which violates the responsibilities we have as beings. It's humbling to consider that God sees the guilt of sin much more clearly than any self-reflective penitent can. He perceives the number and variety of our sins perfectly through His purity. We tend to lump them together in a chaotic way and, instead of recognizing them individually, we only see them as a whole, which causes us to overlook their individual seriousness.
The true penitent views sin in connexion with his personal obligations, and the requirements of the divine law. The Being against whom he rebels, has, he knows, conferred upon him all the blessings of existence; and has, consequently, the most indisputable claim upon his entire obedience--an obedience, however, which, in his presumption and folly, he has refused to render.
The genuine person seeking forgiveness sees sin in relation to their personal responsibilities and the demands of divine law. They understand that the Being they rebel against has given them all the blessings of life, and therefore has an undeniable right to their complete obedience—obedience that, in their arrogance and foolishness, they have chosen not to give.
It may be remarked, also of repentance, that it possesses a character of universality. Its regrets extend to every sin, without exception or excuse: it has no apologies to offer, and cannot hold the balance to measure with cold and calculating nicety, the respective demerits of the offences which have been committed, with a view to conciliate the mercy of heaven, or institute a plea in mitigation of punishment. It is, besides, a deep and permanent impression, which is perpetually renewed by reflection, and by witnessing the transgressions of a degenerate world. What are "the sacrifices of God," but a "broken spirit?" verily, "a broken and a contrite heart, O God, thou wilt not despise."
It can also be said about repentance that it has a universal quality. Its regrets cover every sin, without exception or excuse: it makes no excuses and can't weigh the relative severity of the offenses committed in order to win the mercy of heaven or lessen the punishment. Furthermore, it's a deep and lasting impression that is constantly refreshed by reflection and by observing the wrongs of a corrupt world. What are "the sacrifices of God," if not a "broken spirit?" Truly, "a broken and contrite heart, O God, you will not despise."
We observe, in the next place, if not the words, certainly the very spirit of confession in this once profligate but now penitent woman. It is impossible to imagine a finer or more complete specimen of self-debasement than that which she exhibited upon this occasion. How easily could she have avoided such an exposure of herself, and spared those lamentations! She was under no necessity to introduce herself into the presence of that holy man, whose looks would condemn her immoralities, and whose words, should he condescend to address her, might be expected to convey severe reproof. Surely she might have remained at home:--no--it could not be--she was unable to avoid this exposure, and to spare those lamentations; she was under a most imperious necessity to go to the house of Simon--she could not have remained at home: the irresistible influence of "godly sorrow" urged her in to these circumstances, and her bursting heart was forced to seek relief at the feet of Jesus, Her own vileness tormented her recollections; her views of sin were of the most tragic and affecting kind; in the depths of humiliation, the waves and billows rolled over her; and her tears were confessions of guilt, which he who was perfectly acquainted with the emotions of her spirit, know how to interpret.
We see, next, if not the words, definitely the very spirit of confession in this once reckless but now remorseful woman. It's hard to imagine a better or more complete example of self-degradation than what she showed at this moment. She could have easily avoided exposing herself like this and spared herself those cries of sorrow! There was no need for her to put herself in front of that holy man, whose gaze would condemn her wrongdoings, and whose words, if he decided to speak to her, might be expected to deliver harsh criticism. Surely she could have stayed home: no—she was unable to avoid this exposure and to spare those lamentations; she had an overwhelming need to go to Simon's house—she could not have stayed home: the irresistible pull of "godly sorrow" compelled her into this situation, and her breaking heart was driven to seek comfort at the feet of Jesus. Her own shame tormented her memories; her understanding of sin was deeply tragic and moving; in her profound humiliation, the waves and billows washed over her; and her tears were confessions of guilt, which he who fully understood her feelings knew how to interpret.
How common is it for persons suffering pain of conscience, to plunge into new excesses, in order to disengage themselves from wretchedness of remorse, and, as they hope, to divert their sorrows! This infatuation is attended with mischievous effects: it diminishes sensibility to sin, and confirms the habit. The thorns which at first grew in the path of indulgence, are trampled down by frequent passage; and a return to God becomes every day less and less probable. Familiarity with the various modes of vice weakens the impression of disgust which is originally felt; as we lose by degrees the horror with which an unsightly countenance was beheld at the first interview, till at length we can more than tolerate distortion, and even court deformity. Never was a more important maxim delivered by the Saviour for the guidance of his disciples, than that which respected their avoidance of the first step in transgression. "Watch ye and pray," said he, "lest ye enter into temptation." The fence which is placed around the forbidden fruit-tree, by the interdictions of Heaven, being once violated, the most alarming consequences ensue; and, unless grace prevent, the transgressor must inevitably perish. Avoid then, studiously avoid, whatever leads to the way of death. Escape for thy life, O sinner, from the brink of transgression, if thou hast unhappily ventured so far; and tremble at the yawning gulf below. If thou hast fallen, while thou hast not yet passed the boundaries of life, thou art not irrecoverably lost; but, O let a sense of thy danger induce thee to lift up thine eyes to view the weeping penitent standing in the presence of Jesus Christ, of whom she is accepted, and open thine ears to hear the voice of kind invitation: "Return, thou backsliding Israel, saith the Lord; and I will not cause mine anger to fall upon you: for I am merciful, saith the Lord, and I will not keep anger forever. Only acknowledge thine iniquity, that thou hast transgressed against the Lord thy God, and hast scattered thy ways to the strangers under every green tree, and ye have not obeyed my voice, saith the Lord.... Return, ye backsliding children, and I will heal your backslidings.... He that covereth his sins shall not prosper: but whoso confesseth and forsaketh them, shall have mercy."
How common is it for people feeling guilt to dive into new excesses to escape the misery of remorse, hoping to distract themselves from their sadness! This foolishness has harmful effects: it reduces sensitivity to sin and reinforces the habit. The thorns that once grew on the path of indulgence get trampled down with frequent use, making a return to God increasingly unlikely. Familiarity with different types of vice dulls the initial disgust we feel; just like we gradually lose the horror we experienced when first confronted with an ugly face, until we can even tolerate it and sometimes seek out deformity. There was never a more important principle given by the Savior for guiding his followers than the advice to avoid the first step into wrongdoing. "Watch and pray," he said, "lest you enter into temptation." Once the barrier placed around the forbidden fruit by God's commands is breached, the most serious consequences follow; and unless grace intervenes, the wrongdoer will surely perish. So avoid, carefully avoid, anything that leads to death. Run for your life, O sinner, from the edge of transgression if you have unfortunately gone this far, and be afraid of the gaping chasm below. If you have fallen, and haven't yet crossed the line of life, you are not beyond recovery; but, let the awareness of your danger lead you to look up and see the weeping penitent before Jesus Christ, who accepts her, and open your ears to hear the inviting voice: "Return, you backsliding Israel, says the Lord; and I will not let my anger fall upon you: for I am merciful, says the Lord, and I will not be angry forever. Just acknowledge your wrongs, that you have sinned against the Lord your God, and have gone your own way under every green tree, and you have not obeyed my voice, says the Lord.... Return, you backsliding children, and I will heal your backslidings.... He who hides his sins will not prosper: but whoever confesses and turns away from them will receive mercy."
Further, this woman, who went into Simon's house at Nain, upon the occasion already mentioned, is celebrated by Jesus himself for her faith, which "worked by love." Addressing her in the presence of the astonished company, he said, "Thy faith hath saved thee, go in peace."
Further, this woman who went into Simon's house at Nain, on the occasion already mentioned, is praised by Jesus himself for her faith, which "worked through love." Speaking to her in front of the amazed crowd, he said, "Your faith has saved you, go in peace."
The Pharisees treated others with scornful contempt, especially those whom they deemed to be of notorious character. Theirs was not like Christianity, the religion of compassion--the religion, that, deriving its characteristic peculiarities from its Author, pities the deluded, sympathises with the miserable, seeks to reclaim the criminal, and marks the tears of the penitent; but "trusting in themselves that they were righteous, they despised others." Disregardful, however, of the sneers or reproaches which she might have to encounter, this penitent woman presses to the house of the Pharisee, because Jesus was a guest. Her object was not concealment, but forgiveness; she was willing to be rebuked, so that she might be saved; and while by obtruding in this manner into the house of Simon, she exposed herself to the insults which her dissolute habits would be likely to incur, she courageously adopted a course of proceeding which brought her under the most solemn obligations to future chastity and holiness of life. She was willing that the whole assembly or city should witness her change, and that the reality of her penitence, and the strength of her attachment to Christ, should be as notorious as her former irregularities. Her courage, then, demands notice, and deserves imitation. What might be the opinion of the motley assemblage who were the spectators of her conduct, seemed to have had no influence upon her mind; but obeying the impulse of sorrow for sin, and hope in Jesus, she dismissed every thought of personal exposure, and with tears of undissembled grief, hastened to him who was "full of grace and truth."
The Pharisees looked down on others with disdain, especially those they considered morally questionable. Their attitude was nothing like Christianity, which is a faith of compassion—one that, rooted in its founder, shows pity for the lost, empathizes with the suffering, aims to help the guilty, and values the tears of the repentant. Instead, “trusting in themselves that they were righteous, they despised others.” Unfazed by the ridicule or criticism she might face, this repentant woman made her way to the Pharisee’s house because Jesus was there. She didn’t seek to hide; she sought forgiveness. She was ready to face criticism to find salvation, and by entering Simon’s house, she risked the insults that her past would likely bring. Yet, she bravely chose a path that put her under a deep commitment to live a life of purity and holiness. She was willing for the whole crowd or city to see her transformation and for the reality of her repentance and devotion to Christ to be as well-known as her previous wrongdoings. Her bravery deserves recognition and emulation. The opinions of the diverse crowd watching her actions seemed to have no effect on her. Driven by sorrow for her sins and hope in Jesus, she pushed aside any thoughts of personal shame and, with tears of genuine grief, rushed to the one who was “full of grace and truth.”
Timorousness, arising from an undue regard to the world, is too often a hinderance to religious profession. Persons who have been awakened to some sense of the evil of sin, and have perceived the importance, while they have felt in some degree the claims of piety, frequently, alas! have been deterred from that avowal of their sentiments, which is essential to verify their convictions, and to honour God in the eyes of men. They would be servants of Christ, if they were not slaves to human opinion: they would go to Jesus, if it were not in the observers who stand around: they would renounce the world, if they could avoid reproach: they would, in a word, be decided, but they dare not be singular!
Timidity, stemming from an excessive concern for others' opinions, often gets in the way of truly expressing one's faith. People who have come to realize the seriousness of sin and recognize the importance of being pious, while also feeling some responsibility towards their beliefs, frequently, unfortunately, hold back from openly sharing their views, which is necessary to confirm their beliefs and to honor God in the eyes of others. They want to be followers of Christ, but they feel trapped by what others think; they want to approach Jesus, but they're worried about the onlookers around them; they would like to turn away from worldly things if they could avoid criticism; they want to be clear in their faith, but they hesitate to stand out!
We are required to "confess Christ before men," and it is only by such a confession we can evince the sincerity of our attachment. Jesus Christ was not ashamed to call us brethren, to assume our nature, to fill our humble station, to suffer our sorrows, and to die an ignominious death:--he is not ashamed to own his connexion with us, now he is ascended into the highest heavens, or to be engaged in preparing a place for us amidst the mansions of glory. Shall we be ashamed of him, or his cause? Shall we be afraid to avow our regard, if we feel it?
We are called to "confess Christ before men," and it's only through such a confession that we can show how genuine our commitment really is. Jesus Christ was never embarrassed to call us brothers, to take on our human nature, to embrace our humble position, to share in our sufferings, and to die a shameful death. He isn’t ashamed to acknowledge his connection with us now that he has ascended to the highest heavens, or to be involved in preparing a place for us among the glorious mansions. Should we be ashamed of him, or his mission? Should we be scared to express our feelings if we truly have them?
It is the design of Christ to establish an interest in the world which shall be universally prevalent, and this cause is rendered visible by the public profession of its adherents. In the apostolic age, therefore, to embrace Christianity, and to profess it, were considered as inseparably connected; and why should they now be separated? "Then they that gladly received the word were baptized."
It’s Christ’s intention to create a global influence that is widespread, and this purpose is made clear through the public expression of its followers. In the early church, accepting and professing Christianity were seen as connected; so why should they be separated now? "Then those who gladly accepted the message were baptized."
Do any circumstances now exist to render it proper to act contrary to apostolical example and precept? Is not the world the same? is not the command of Jesus the same? is not his religion the same as in primitive ages? This cause is to be now maintained as then; not by fear, but by firmness--not by compliance with the world, but by resisting it--not by sloth, inactivity, and shrinking into a corner, but by "putting on the whole armour of God," and pressing to the field of battle. Not to be for Christ, is to be against him; inactivity is enmity; a dread of standing in the ranks, or a refusal to enlist under the banners of Immanuel, are indications of disloyalty, rebellion, and treason. The territories of his grace are invaded by the troops of hell--the great power that "ruleth in the children of disobedience" is opposing the kingdom of the Redeemer, and extending his influence over the hearts of men. Not to resist his encroachments, therefore, not to withstand in our own person his dominion, and declare our cause, is, in fact, to favour his designs, and betray him whom we profess to love. It is stated, that at the second appearance of Christ "he will be glorified in his saints, and admired in all them that believe;" and it is in them he expects now to be glorified before men; and the most effectual way to honour him is to "confess him," to avow before the world our determination to be "on the Lord's side.
Do any circumstances exist now that would make it appropriate to go against the example and teachings of the apostles? Is the world not the same? Is Jesus' command not the same? Is his religion not the same as it was in the early days? This cause should be upheld now as it was then; not out of fear, but with determination—not by conforming to the world, but by resisting it—not through laziness, inactivity, or hiding away, but by "putting on the whole armor of God" and stepping into the battle. To not stand for Christ is to stand against him; inactivity is enmity; a fear of taking a stand or a refusal to join the ranks under the banners of Immanuel are signs of disloyalty, rebellion, and betrayal. The domains of his grace are being attacked by the forces of evil—the great power that "rules in the children of disobedience" is opposing the kingdom of the Redeemer and spreading his influence over the hearts of people. Therefore, to not resist his advances, to not stand against his rule personally, and to not declare our allegiance, is essentially to support his plans and betray the one we claim to love. It is said that at Christ's second coming "he will be glorified in his saints, and admired in all who believe;" and it is in them that he expects now to be glorified before others; the most effective way to honor him is to "confess him," to publicly declare our commitment to being "on the Lord's side."
"Perfect love," remarks an apostle, "casteth out fear;" of which we have a striking exemplification in this woman of Nain. The expressions of her attachment to Jesus were such as could not be mistaken, for she not only caressed him, but made considerable sacrifices to show her love. The gifts of nature had been the instruments of dissipation. With what care had she been accustomed to adjust her smiles, to throw fascination into her countenance, to beautify her person, to arrange her dress and her hair, and to cultivate every exterior charm! What sums of money had she lavished upon herself, with a view to attract admiration! Behold her now at the feet of Jesus, careless of her personal attractions, and absorbed in the contemplation of her Saviour: she washes his feet with her tears, wipes them with the hairs of her head, kisses his feet, [31] and even expends an alabaster box of ointment, very precious and costly, in anointing them. Whatever has been the occasion or the means of transgression, becomes an object of dislike; and in the true spirit of penitence, she not only deserts what is obviously criminal, but detests and relinquishes whatever may tend to renew the remembrance of indulgence, or rekindle the expiring flame of desire. She renounces every superfluity, submits cheerfully to every privation, and slays at once with unreluctant severity, the dearest lusts that twine about her heart. It is thus that a sincere Christian will abandon both the practice and principle of sin, and aware of his peculiar propensities, he will watch with a scrupulousness proportioned to his sense of danger, over those sins to which he knows himself to have been most inclined in the days of his unregeneracy. "If thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell. And if thy right hand offend thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell."
"Perfect love," says an apostle, "drives out fear;" and we see a clear example of this in the woman from Nain. Her expressions of love for Jesus were unmistakable, as she not only showed him affection but also made significant sacrifices to demonstrate her devotion. The gifts she had from nature had been the means of her indulgence. She had meticulously crafted her smiles, used charm to enhance her looks, beautified herself, arranged her outfit and hair, and cultivated every external allure! She had spent a fortune on herself to attract admiration! But now, here she is at Jesus' feet, unconcerned about her appearance and fully focused on her Savior: she washes his feet with her tears, dries them with her hair, kisses his feet, [31] and even pours out an expensive alabaster jar of ointment to anoint them. Whatever led to her wrongdoing now feels repulsive to her; in true repentance, she not only turns away from what is clearly wrong but also hates and lets go of anything that might remind her of past indulgences or reignite her former desires. She gives up every excess, willingly endures every hardship, and decisively cuts off the deepest desires that have wrapped around her heart. This is how a genuine Christian will forsake both the actions and the motivations of sin, and being aware of their struggles, they will vigilantly guard against the sins they have been most prone to in their unregenerate days. "If your right eye causes you to stumble, gouge it out and throw it away; it is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell. And if your right hand causes you to stumble, cut it off and throw it away; it is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to go into hell."
Reader! examine into the state of thy mind, the propensities that reign within, and the principles that predominate in thy heart! Hast thou professed an attachment to Jesus Christ? "Dost thou believe in the Son of God?" What sacrifices hast thou made, tending to evince the sincerity of thy declarations, and the ardour of thy love? Hast thou braved reproach--stood firm amidst opposition--abandoned criminal practices and guilty associates--assisted the cause of thy Lord--encouraged and supplied his disciples--and for his sake been willing even to renounce indulgences, which, if they were innocent, might have proved offensive to others, or ensnaring to thyself. Decision of character is important, both as a proof of our own sincerity, and as a means of confirming others in religion; for neutrality, which Christ himself has so pointedly condemned, is even more prejudicial than hostility.
Reader! Take a moment to reflect on your mind, the tendencies that dominate within you, and the values that are most important in your heart! Have you claimed to love Jesus Christ? "Do you believe in the Son of God?" What sacrifices have you made to show the honesty of your words and the depth of your love? Have you faced criticism—stood strong amid challenges—given up bad habits and harmful friends—supported the mission of your Lord—encouraged and aided his followers—and for his sake, been ready to give up pleasures, which, even if they are innocent, might upset others or trap you? Being decisive in your character is crucial, both as proof of your sincerity and as a way to strengthen others in their faith; for being neutral, which Christ himself condemned so clearly, is even more damaging than being openly against it.
But it is not sufficient to inquire into the extent of those sacrifices which may have been offered to the service of religion, the nature of those sacrifices must be investigated; otherwise there may be "a fair show in the flesh," while the individual is destitute of the essential principles of Christianity. The love of the world, and indulgence in secret sin, may be compatible with an ostentatious religion. What is difficult to some, may prove comparatively easy to others, whose constitutional tendencies or mental prepossessions are of another description. The sacrifice, for example, of a spendthrift to religion must be of a different kind from that of a miser; otherwise the one may obtain undue credit for splendid charities, and the other for pious scrupulosity. In estimating, therefore, the characters of men, or apportioning their duties, the respective casts of mind, habits, and inclinations, are to be investigated, in order to judge of the one, or prescribe the other. To gain advantage from a course of self-inspection, it is requisite to study the peculiarities of our own mind, and to ascertain what is really a sacrifice to ourselves, and how far we have made it, or are prepared to offer it, to Christ. What gratifications have we relinquished? what sins have we resisted? what lusts have we overcome? Where are we in point of moral progress? Has our professed penitence led us to Christ? What degree of assimilation to him have we attained? Have we, in fact, devoted to life service our ENTIRE BEING--and do we feel that
But it's not enough to look at the amount of sacrifices that may have been made for religion; we also need to examine the meaning of those sacrifices. Otherwise, there could be "a fair show in the flesh," while the person lacks the fundamental principles of Christianity. Love for the world and indulging in hidden sins can exist alongside a flashy religion. What is tough for some might be relatively easy for others, whose natural tendencies or mental biases are different. For instance, the sacrifice made by a spendthrift for religion will be different from that of a miser; otherwise, one could get undue praise for generous giving, while the other could be recognized for false piety. So, when evaluating people's characters or assigning their responsibilities, we should consider their respective mindsets, habits, and inclinations in order to assess one or dictate the other. To benefit from self-reflection, we need to understand the unique traits of our own minds and to determine what truly counts as a sacrifice for ourselves, and how far we've made it or are willing to give it to Christ. What pleasures have we let go of? What sins have we fought against? What desires have we conquered? How far have we progressed morally? Has our claimed repentance brought us closer to Christ? How much have we aligned ourselves with him? Have we truly dedicated our ENTIRE BEING to a life of service--and do we feel that
"Our lives and thousand lives of ours"
"Our lives and a thousand lives beyond ours"
can neither discharge our obligations, nor repay his love?
can neither fulfill our obligations nor return his love?
The state of the mind is often indicated by trifles, better than by what appears to be of greater magnitude and importance. There are, certain actions not intended for the public, and, therefore, not dressed up for inspection, which mark the feelings of the heart, and the meaning of which no vigilant observer can mistake. There is a truth and a certainty about them sufficiently obvious; they as infallibly show the state of the man, as the index points to the hour of the day. In the history of the penitent sinner, the negligence of her dress and hair, which had doubtless before been decorated, according to the habit of the age, with jewels, was such an indication. Some professed penitents would have given, perhaps, the costly presentation of the alabaster box of ointment, but would have found it infinitely more difficult to renounce their vanity: but here the sacrifice was complete; her best affections were engrossed with the new object of her delight, and she virtually said, "Perish, thou love of the world; perish, thou fond and criminal passion for show; perish, all ye ministers of iniquity, at the feet of Jesus! I willingly exchange masters; and henceforth I shall be regardless of personal attractions, solicitous only of participating the blessings of salvation!"
The state of the mind is often revealed by small things, even more than by what seems to be more significant and important. There are certain actions not meant for public view that reveal the feelings of the heart, and their meaning is unmistakable to any careful observer. There’s a truth and certainty about them that’s obvious; they show the state of a person just as clearly as a clock shows the time of day. In the story of the repentant sinner, the neglect of her clothing and hair, which had likely once been adorned, according to the fashion of the time, was a clear indication. Some so-called penitents might have willingly given the expensive alabaster box of ointment, but would have found it much harder to give up their vanity. Here, though, the sacrifice was complete; her best feelings were focused on her new source of joy, and she effectively said, "Goodbye, love of the world; goodbye, yearning for attention; goodbye, all you temptations, at the feet of Jesus! I willingly switch my allegiance; from now on, I won’t care about appearances, only about sharing in the blessings of salvation!"
Simon, during all this time, was an attentive observer of what passed; but rashly concluded within himself that Jesus could not be a prophet, as he seemed ignorant of the character of the woman whom he admitted to such familiarity. He mistook both the character of the woman, and that of his divine guest. She was not, in his sense of the term, a sinner, but a penitent and a believer; nor was Jesus capable of contamination by her touch. He knew perfectly, "who and what manner of woman it was," though the Pharisee was too proud to see or acknowledge it. The important change which had been produced upon her, essentially altered the case. She was no longer what she had been, and what Simon supposed her. Grace had constituted her a chosen vessel, and purified her heart by the impartation of heavenly principles. The impurities of her life were rectified by the "renewal of a right spirit" within her. She had been snatched from the jaws of destruction; she had resorted to the "fountain opened for sin and uncleanness," and proved that she was one of those "lost sheep" which Jesus came into the wilderness to "seek and to save."
Simon, all this time, was closely watching everything that happened; but he foolishly decided on his own that Jesus couldn’t be a prophet, as he seemed unaware of who the woman was that he allowed to become so familiar with him. He misunderstood both the woman’s character and that of his divine guest. She was not, in his definition, a sinner, but a penitent and a believer; nor was Jesus susceptible to contamination from her touch. He knew exactly "who and what manner of woman it was," even though the Pharisee was too proud to see or admit it. The significant transformation that had taken place in her fundamentally changed the situation. She was no longer who she used to be, and what Simon thought she was. Grace had made her a chosen vessel and cleansed her heart by instilling heavenly principles. The impurities of her life were corrected by the "renewal of a right spirit" within her. She had been rescued from the brink of destruction; she had come to the "fountain opened for sin and uncleanness," and showed that she was one of those "lost sheep" that Jesus came into the wilderness to "seek and to save."
Simon had not expressed his ideas, but the Saviour knew them with perfect certainty, and answered them with unerring wisdom. Having first claimed the attention of his host, which was respectfully conceded, Jesus delivered a parable respecting a creditor having two debtors, who owed, the one five hundred, and the other fifty pence, but were both forgiven in consideration of their poverty; and he put it to the Pharisee, which of them would love him most? he properly answered, "he to whom he forgave most." Then turning to the woman--and, O what sensations of joy must have thrilled through her agitated bosom!--he continued to direct his discourse to Simon; "Seest thou this woman?" q.d. "Art thou aware of the extent and value of those sacrifices she has made to me? Hast thou observed the tears she has shed, and the love she has manifested? Has it struck thy mind, that the conduct of this woman, whom thou art despising in thy heart, is far more deserving of my approbation than thine?" Mark, with what punctuality and detail he proceeds to enumerate every act of kindness! He mentions her tears, her caresses, the kisses, and the ointment which she had lavished upon his feet--nothing is forgotten or omitted--everything is distinctly told--her love is extolled, and her sins are pardoned: Simon, "her sins, which are many, are forgiven"--Woman, "thy sins are forgiven." There is a beauty and a propriety in this repetition, which was well calculated to stimulate the inquiries, and to correct the errors of the Pharisee, while it ministered consolation to the weeping penitent. Ah! our secret desires, our silent tears, our meanest services, are noticed by our Master and Lord! He will "reward us openly" having given the grace of penitence, he will bestow the joys of faith; our many sins shall be overlooked and forgiven; our few services remembered and recorded for his sake!
Simon hadn’t shared his thoughts, but the Savior knew them clearly and responded with flawless wisdom. After getting the attention of his host, which was given respectfully, Jesus shared a parable about a creditor with two debtors: one owed five hundred pence, and the other fifty, but both were forgiven because of their financial hardship. He asked the Pharisee which of them would love him more, and the Pharisee correctly responded, "the one who was forgiven more." Then Jesus turned to the woman—oh, what joy must have surged through her troubled heart!—and continued speaking to Simon, saying, "Do you see this woman?" meaning, "Are you aware of the sacrifices she’s made for me? Have you noticed her tears and the love she’s shown? Have you considered that her actions, which you are despising in your heart, are far more worthy of my approval than yours?" Notice how he carefully lists each act of kindness! He talks about her tears, her touches, the kisses, and the ointment she poured on his feet—nothing is forgotten or left out—everything is clearly stated—her love is praised, and her sins are forgiven: Simon, "Her many sins are forgiven." Woman, "Your sins are forgiven." There’s a beautiful and fitting quality in this repetition that was designed to provoke questions and correct the Pharisee's misunderstandings, while also bringing comfort to the weeping penitent. Ah! Our secret desires, our silent tears, our smallest acts of service are recognized by our Master and Lord! He will "reward us openly;" having granted the grace of repentance, he will give us the joys of faith; our many sins will be overlooked and forgiven; our few acts of service will be remembered and cherished for his sake!
This parable is illustrative of our moral obligations, and of our total incapacity to discharge them. We are all debtors--to God; we are so, it is true, in different proportions--some owe five hundred and some fifty pence. A difference exists in the nature and atrocity of our respective crimes--we have run to greater or less extravagances of iniquity--our sins are more or less notorious, more or less limited or extensive in their influence on others; more or less aggravated by knowledge, by vows, and by repetition--indulged in for a longer or a shorter period, as there was a great diversity of moral character between the Pharisee and the woman; but "all have sinned, and, come short of the glory of God"--all have incurred debt--and it is important to remark, that all are equally incapable of discharging it--of atoning for their guilt, or rescuing themselves from the pains and penalties they have incurred.
This parable illustrates our moral responsibilities and our complete inability to fulfill them. We are all debtors—to God; that’s true, but in different amounts—some owe five hundred and others fifty pence. There is a difference in the nature and severity of our respective wrongdoings—we have indulged in varying degrees of sin. Our sins are more or less well-known, more or less limited or widespread in their impact on others; they are more or less worsened by awareness, by promises, and by repetition—indulged in for a longer or shorter time, reflecting the significant difference in moral character between the Pharisee and the woman. Yet, "all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God"—all have incurred debt—and it’s crucial to note that all are equally unable to pay it off—unable to atone for their guilt or save themselves from the consequences they have brought upon themselves.
However plain this statement, and however frequently repeated, it is but little believed and felt. If it were--if mankind were actually convinced of the utter inefficiency of every attempt to recommend themselves to God, and regain his forfeited favour; whence is it that they are perpetually "going about to establish their own righteousness?" Why do they endeavour to persuade themselves that sin is a trifling concern, or that at least their sins are trivial and excusable? It is obvious, that they form very low and inadequate ideas of the greatness of their debt, and the utter worthlessness of their own merit--they do not realize their ruined and bankrupt condition, nor are they sufficiently persuaded that they have "nothing to pay" not an atom of righteousness, not a grain of inherent goodness, not a particle of real virtue!
However straightforward this statement is, and however often it's repeated, it’s not widely believed or felt. If it were—if humanity truly grasped the complete ineffectiveness of any efforts to win God’s approval and regain His lost favor—then why are they constantly “trying to establish their own righteousness”? Why do they try to convince themselves that sin is a minor issue, or that at least their sins are insignificant and justifiable? It’s clear that they have a very limited and insufficient understanding of the magnitude of their debt and the total uselessness of their own merits—they don't recognize their ruined and bankrupt state, nor are they fully convinced that they have "nothing to pay"—not a speck of righteousness, not a bit of inherent goodness, not an ounce of real virtue!
Sinner, come to the test. Hear the indictment, and see if thou hast any defence, if thou hast any plea, or if thou canst put in any just demurrer to stay the proceedings of eternal justice and equity. But how shall human language express the debt? Thou hast violated every divine precept, pursued a course diametrically opposite to the commandments of God, trampled on his authority, and lived to thyself. Every action, word, and thought, has augmented the already incalculable debt. God has called, but thou hast refused; his providence has warned thee, but thou hast despised it, and made a covenant with hell. While thy personal transgressions have abounded like the drops of the ocean, or the sands upon the shore, thy example has perniciously influenced others. Thou owest thy whole existence and all thy faculties, thy entire obedience and constant affection, to God. He is thy Father--thy Creator--thy Benefactor, and what hast thou to pay? what are thy resources? Future obedience, supposing it perfect, could not expiate past offences. Pains, prostrations, pilgrimages, penances, and mortifications, can be of no avail. Hecatombs of animals would not suffice, or ten thousand rivers of oil; but, if they would, the treasures are not thine: "for every beast of the forest is mine, and the cattle upon a thousand hills. I know all the fowls of the mountains: and the wild beasts of the field are mine. If I were hungry, I would not tell thee: for the world is mine, and the fulness thereof. Will I eat the flesh of bulls, or drink the blood of goats?" What then hast thou to pay?--Nothing! absolutely nothing!
Sinner, come to the test. Listen to the charges against you and see if you have any defense, any plea, or if you can present any valid reason to halt the proceedings of eternal justice and fairness. But how can human language express the debt? You have broken every divine command, followed a path that is the complete opposite of God's commandments, disrespected His authority, and lived for yourself. Every action, word, and thought has increased the already unimaginable debt. God has called you, but you have refused; His providence has warned you, but you have ignored it and made a deal with destruction. While your personal wrongdoings have piled up like the drops in the ocean or the grains of sand on the shore, your example has negatively influenced others. You owe your entire existence and all your abilities, your complete obedience and unwavering love, to God. He is your Father—your Creator—your Benefactor, and what do you have to offer? What are your resources? Future obedience, even if it is perfect, cannot atone for past wrongs. Suffering, acts of humility, pilgrimages, penances, and self-denial will not help. Sacrificing countless animals would not be enough, nor would ten thousand rivers of oil; but even if it would, the treasures are not yours: "for every beast of the forest is mine, and the cattle upon a thousand hills. I know all the birds of the mountains: and the wild animals of the fields are mine. If I were hungry, I would not tell you: for the world is mine, and everything in it. Will I eat the flesh of bulls, or drink the blood of goats?" So what do you have to pay?—Nothing! absolutely nothing!
But the parable in question represents the free pardon, which it is the privilege of the vilest transgressors to participate upon their return to God, And we should mark the sovereignty, blended with the mercy of this procedure. It is not supposed that the recipients of divine bounty and blessing have any claim upon such favors; nor, indeed, that they can plead any extenuating circumstance to conciliate offended justice. The debtors had "nothing to pay," and their impoverished condition was a sufficient excitement to their creditor to remit his dues. He "remembered them in their low estate;" and, with a liberality characteristic of him to whom we are so deeply indebted in a moral sense, he discharged them from every obligation. There is not the slightest intimation of any urgency or solicitation on their part; but he "frankly forgave them." If sinners had any just conception of their state, they would indeed seek mercy with the utmost importunity, and relinquish their present courses with the most fixed resolution of mind; but the grace of God operates in calling men to repentance, as well as in constraining their attention and acquiescence. They are "made willing" in "the day of his power;" and, like a gale that rises upon a vessel drifting to a rocky shore, and bears it from destruction, this influence effectually propels them to "the hope set before them" in the Gospel.
But the parable in question shows the free forgiveness that even the worst offenders can receive when they turn back to God. We should note the sovereignty combined with the mercy in this process. It’s not assumed that those who receive divine grace and blessings have any right to such favors; nor can they argue any mitigating circumstances to appease offended justice. The debtors had "nothing to pay," and their desperate situation was enough for their creditor to waive what they owed. He "remembered them in their low estate;" and with a generosity typical of the one we owe so much to morally, he freed them from every obligation. There’s no hint of any pressure or plea from them; he "frankly forgave them." If sinners truly understood their condition, they would earnestly seek mercy and give up their current ways with a strong determination. But God’s grace works in calling people to repentance, as well as in capturing their attention and willingness. They are "made willing" in "the day of his power;" and like a gust of wind that saves a ship drifting toward a rocky shore, this influence effectively drives them toward "the hope set before them" in the Gospel.
The exercise of mercy is distinguished also for its extensive and diversified application. Simon the Pharisee, and the woman who was a sinner, differed in the nature and proportion of their guilt. He was as much condemned for self-righteousness, as she for impurity--he transgressed by pride, and she by rebellion: but "he frankly forgave them both." "Who is a God like unto thee, that pardoneth iniquity, and passeth by the transgression of the remnant of his heritage? he retaineth not his anger for ever, because he delighteth in mercy! He will turn again, he will have compassion upon us; he will subdue our iniquities; and thou wilt cast all their sins into the depths of the sea."
The act of showing mercy is also notable for its wide and varied application. Simon the Pharisee and the sinful woman had different types and levels of guilt. He was just as condemned for his self-righteousness as she was for her immorality—he sinned out of pride, while she sinned out of rebellion: yet "he forgave them both." "Who is a God like you, who forgives wrongdoing and overlooks the rebellion of his people? He doesn't stay angry forever because he takes pleasure in showing mercy! He will come back to us; he will have compassion on us; he will deal with our sins, and you will throw all their sins into the depths of the sea."
If, reader, thou art impressed with a sense of guilt, and ready to exclaim, "What must I do to be saved?" it is with unspeakable satisfaction and confidence we point to "the Lamb of God that taketh away the sins of the world." That heart which was melted by the tears of this woman, is not closed against thee! That Saviour who was all pity and benevolence in the days of his humiliation, still waits to be gracious now he is exalted to his throne!
If you, reader, feel a sense of guilt and are ready to shout, "What must I do to be saved?" we are filled with immense satisfaction and confidence as we direct you to "the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world." The heart that was moved by this woman's tears is not closed off to you! That Savior, who was full of compassion and kindness during his time of humility, still waits to be gracious now that he is elevated to his throne!
Hast thou experienced the efficacy of his grace, and the joys of his salvation? Be stimulated to love him much. What sins, what rebellions, what broken vows, what ingratitude has he forgiven thee! All are obliterated from the book of his remembrance; all are lost and buried in the ocean of his grace; and he has fixed thy name amongst a thousand promises, and in a page which his eye never peruses but with ineffable complacency!
Have you felt the power of his grace and the joy of his salvation? Be inspired to love him greatly. What sins, what defiance, what broken promises, what ingratitude has he forgiven you! All are erased from the record of his memory; all are gone and buried in the sea of his grace; and he has placed your name among a thousand promises, on a page that he never looks at without indescribable pleasure!
The plan upon which forgiveness is dispensed to a sinful world, and which is now more fully developed, demands our admiration, as it glorifies God, exalts the sinner, and harmonizes the universe.
The plan through which forgiveness is given to a sinful world, and which is now more fully developed, deserves our admiration, as it honors God, uplifts the sinner, and brings harmony to the universe.
It glorifies God. The work of redemption by our Lord Jesus Christ is the central point, where all the perfections of Deity assemble and meet. Every attribute of God pointing to Calvary, seems to devout believers to say, as Jesus did to his disciples, with reference to their last interview on a mountain in Galilee, "There shall ye see me." His perfections had hitherto appeared in the world in their distinct forms.--Justice in its inflexible decisions, Truth in its firm decrees, Holiness in its terrible inflictions, operated powerfully, but often separately--as in the destruction of Pharaoh, and the deliverance of Israel--in the earthquake that devoured the rebels who presented strange fire--in the deluge that overwhelmed the world--in the burning tempest that descended upon Sodom, and the sword that scattered the nations of Canaan; but round the brink of that "fountain which was opened" on Calvary for "sin and uncleanness," they seem to unite and say, "Glory to God in the highest." This is the common and sacred ground, on which "mercy and truth can meet together." Inflexible justice does not remit her claims, but "the Lamb that was slain" satisfies them--she still demands blood--and blood is shed--she demands the life of the guilty, and the guilty are furnished with a victim who can endure the curse and suffer the chastisement--she requires a recompense for the violated law; and "he hath magnified the law and made it honorable," by becoming "obedient unto death, even the death of the cross!"
It glorifies God. The work of redemption by our Lord Jesus Christ is the central point where all the attributes of God come together. Each quality of God pointing to Calvary seems to tell devoted believers, just as Jesus did to his disciples during their last meeting on a mountain in Galilee, "There you will see me." His attributes had previously shown themselves in the world in distinct forms. Justice displayed its rigid decisions, Truth stood firm in its decrees, Holiness was evident in its fierce consequences, all acting powerfully but often separately—like in the destruction of Pharaoh and the liberation of Israel, in the earthquake that consumed the rebels offering strange fire, in the flood that drowned the world, in the fiery storm that fell on Sodom, and in the sword that drove out the nations of Canaan. But around the edge of that "fountain which was opened" on Calvary for "sin and uncleanness," they seem to come together and proclaim, "Glory to God in the highest." This is the common and sacred ground where "mercy and truth can meet together." Inflexible justice does not drop her demands, but "the Lamb that was slain" meets them—she still requires blood—and blood is shed—she demands the life of the guilty, and the guilty are provided a victim who can bear the curse and endure the punishment—she seeks a payment for the broken law; and "he has magnified the law and made it honorable" by becoming "obedient unto death, even the death of the cross!"
This plan of mercy exalts the sinner. If the requisitions of justice were strictly personal, and the economy of Heaven such as to admit of no substitute, the sinner's salvation would have been impossible; because his individual sufferings, though the just consequence of his guilt, could never become the meritorious means of its removal. Suffering, extreme in its nature, and perpetual in its duration, was the desert of transgression; but it could neither repair the injury which sin had done, nor constitute a claim upon divine forgiveness; or, if it could--by the very supposition there would be no possibility of any period arriving when that mercy could be enjoyed, because the suffering must be eternal. Such, however, was the infinite merit of the Saviour, that in the plan of forgiving mercy, his death was accepted as an equivalent for the sufferings of creatures. By exercising faith in his name, we transfer the burden of our debt, and he liquidates it: we confess we have nothing to pay, and wholly confide in his ability to discharge on our behalf every obligation; in consequence of which the transgressor is treated as innocent; he is released--the door is opened, his chains are broken off, and he is exalted to the favour and friendship of God; and "Who," he inquires, "shall lay any thing to the charge of God's elect? It is God that justifieth. Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us"
This plan of mercy elevates the sinner. If the requirements of justice were strictly personal and Heaven's system allowed for no substitutes, the sinner's salvation would have been impossible; because their individual suffering, though a rightful consequence of their guilt, could never be the way to remove it. Extreme and everlasting suffering was the penalty for wrongdoing; but it could neither fix the damage caused by sin nor create a claim for divine forgiveness; or, if it could—by that very assumption, there would never be a time when that mercy could be experienced, because the suffering would have to be eternal. However, the Saviour's infinite merit meant that in the plan of forgiving mercy, his death was accepted as a substitute for the sufferings of beings. By having faith in his name, we shift the weight of our debt to him, and he takes care of it: we admit we have nothing to offer and fully trust in his ability to settle every obligation for us; as a result, the sinner is considered innocent; they are freed—the door is opened, their chains are broken, and they are raised to the favor and friendship of God; and "Who," he asks, "can bring any charge against God's chosen? It is God who justifies. Who is there to condemn? It is Christ who died, yes, rather, who has risen again, who sits at the right hand of God and also intercedes for us."
This plan of mercy harmonizes the universe. Sin has separated chief friends--it has divided man from God, man from angels, and man from his neighbour. It has introduced a general war, and generated universal anarchy and strife. But redemption is the great work that restores order and promotes concord. It is on Calvary the terms are made, and the great treaty ratified--divided interests are reunited, and peace on earth proclaimed. It is there "God is in Christ reconciling the world to himself;" and there, realizing the efficacy of atoning blood, and weeping over the follies and criminality of past rebellion, the penitent exclaims, "Abba, Father!" Thus God and man are united. It is there holy angels, instead of being executioners of vengeance, become "ministering spirits to the heirs of salvation;" while every Lazarus begins to anticipate the period of "absence from the body," when "he shall be carried by angels to Abraham's bosom," and be "ever present with the Lord." Thus men and angels become one. It is there also before the cross, having "tasted that the Lord is gracious," "the brother of low degree rejoices in that he is exalted, and the rich in that he is made low." There the murderer Saul meets his victim Stephen, with "all who in every place call on the name of the Lord;" and (O happy change!) embraces as a brother him whom he believed a foe! There the turbulence of passion is allayed--the violence of animosity ceases--the battle of conflicting interests and petty selfishness rages no more. Those who were enemies in the world, become friends at the cross. The barbarian, Scythian, bond, and free, drink together the cup of blessing, partake the "common salvation," and imbibe the fraternal spirit. Thus man and man unite, while "Christ is all and in all."
This plan of mercy harmonizes the universe. Sin has separated close friends; it has pulled man away from God, man from angels, and man from his neighbors. It has led to widespread conflict and created chaos and strife. But redemption is the powerful force that restores order and fosters harmony. It is at Calvary where the terms are set, and the great agreement is confirmed—divided interests come together, and peace on earth is announced. Here, “God is in Christ reconciling the world to himself;” and there, grasping the power of atoning blood and grieving over the mistakes and wrongdoings of past rebellion, the penitent cries out, “Abba, Father!” In this way, God and man are brought together. It is here that holy angels, instead of acting as agents of vengeance, become “ministering spirits to the heirs of salvation;” while every Lazarus starts to look forward to the time of “absence from the body,” when “he shall be carried by angels to Abraham's bosom,” and be “ever present with the Lord.” Thus men and angels become one. It is also here before the cross, having “tasted that the Lord is gracious,” “the brother of low degree rejoices in that he is exalted, and the rich in that he is made low.” There the murderer Saul meets his victim Stephen, along with “all who in every place call on the name of the Lord;” and (O happy change!) he embraces as a brother the one he thought was an enemy! Here the turmoil of passion calms—the violence of hatred stops—and the battles of conflicting interests and petty selfishness end. Those who were enemies in the world become friends at the cross. The barbarian, Scythian, bond, and free all share the cup of blessing, partake in the “common salvation,” and embrace the spirit of brotherhood. In this way, man and man unite, while “Christ is all and in all.”
"Religion, in all its parts, requires the exercise of forgiveness. It is required by its precepts, its spirit, and its prospects. Its precepts--we are not to render evil for evil, but contrariwise blessing: we are to love our enemies, to forgive our brother as often as he returns acknowledging his misconduct, and saying, 'I repent.' Its spirit; the Gospel, or the religion of Jesus, is emphatically styled 'the ministry of reconciliation.' Its prospects; we are members of the same family, heirs of the same kingdom, and going to the same heaven. Heaven is a state of perfect and universal harmony and love. Nothing must enter there, either to defile or disturb. There must be no little disputes, no rising resentment, no shadow of reserve. All must be of one heart and of one soul. Yes, if we both be Christians indeed, there we must meet our brother, with whom wo have been angry, and towards whom we have even indulged our anger; an anger upon which not only the 'sun went down,' but over which life itself passed. Yes, happy necessity! there we must meet him! There will be no passing' by on the other side, no refusing to go into his company. Countenance must sparkle to countenance, thought must meet thought, bosom must expand to bosom, and heart bound to heart forever."
"Religion, in all its aspects, demands the act of forgiveness. It's required by its teachings, its essence, and its future. Its teachings—we should not repay evil with evil, but instead respond with kindness: we are to love our enemies and forgive our brothers whenever they acknowledge their wrongdoing and say, 'I’m sorry.' Its essence; the Gospel, or the religion of Jesus, is clearly referred to as 'the ministry of reconciliation.' Its future; we are part of the same family, heirs to the same kingdom, and heading to the same heaven. Heaven represents a state of complete and universal harmony and love. Nothing should enter there that would tarnish or disrupt it. There should be no petty arguments, no rising resentment, no lingering grudges. Everyone must be united in heart and soul. Yes, if we are truly Christians, we must meet our brother there, even if we have been angry with him, allowing our anger to linger long after the 'sun went down,' affecting our lives. Yes, what a joyful necessity! We must encounter him! There will be no avoiding him, no refusing to engage with him. Faces must light up in recognition, thoughts must connect, hearts must open to one another, and souls must bond together forever."
The Syrophenician; or Canaanitish Woman.
Chapter VI.
Introductory Observations--Christ could not be concealed--the Syrophenician Woman goes to him on Account of her Daughter--her Humility--Earnestness--Faith--the Silence of Christ upon her Application to him--the Disciples repulsed--the Woman's renewed Importunity--the apparent Scorn with which it is treated--her Admission of the contemptuous Insinuation--her persevering Ardour--her ultimate Success--the Necessity of being Importunate in Prayer--Remarks on the Woman's national Character--Present State of the Jews--the Hope of their final Restoration.
Introductory Observations--Christ couldn't be hidden--the Syrophenician Woman approaches him for her daughter--her humility--urgency--faith--Christ's silence in response to her request--the disciples' rejection--the woman's persistent appeal--the seeming disdain with which it is met--her acknowledgment of the disrespectful implication--her relentless determination--her eventual success--the importance of being persistent in prayer--comments on the woman's national identity--current situation of the Jews--the hope for their eventual restoration.
The facts and incidents of the New Testament furnish the best exposition of its doctrines. Owing to the imperfection of human language, as a medium of communicating truth, and, the very limited capacities of the human mind, as well as the numerous prejudices that darken our understandings in the present state, some obscurities will always attend even the clearest revelations of Heaven. "Touched with a feeling of our infirmities," our blessed Saviour often adopted a parabolic method of instruction, which was calculated to awaken attention and to stimulate inquiry, as well as to simplify the great principles he was perpetually inculcating; and he has caused those frequent conversations into which he entered with different individuals during his personal ministry, to be transmitted to succeeding times for their instruction. We have by this means an opportunity of witnessing the diversified modes in which truth operates on men; we see the various workings of the passions, the progress of conviction, the development of character, and the designs of Infinite Mercy. The sublimest doctrines and the finest precepts are taught by example; and we are shown what they are, by seeing what they accomplish. The sacred history introduces us to persons of like passions with ourselves, and, by its interesting details, gives us a participation of their hopes and fears, their joys and sorrows, their difficulties and their successes. We are not introduced into the school of Socrates, the academy of Plato, or the Lyceum of Aristotle, where some wise maxims were undoubtedly dictated to the respective admirers of these eminent men; but we are conducted from the region of abstractions to real life. Christianity is taught, by showing us, Christians--humility by holding up to view the humble--repentance by exhibiting the penitent--charity by pointing out the benevolent--faith by displaying, as in the narrative before us, the true believer.
The facts and events of the New Testament provide the best explanation of its teachings. Due to the limitations of human language as a way to convey truth, the restricted capacity of the human mind, and the many biases that cloud our understanding in the current state, some uncertainties will always be present, even in the clearest heavenly revelations. "Touched with a feeling of our weaknesses," our blessed Savior often used parables to teach, which were designed to grab attention and encourage questioning, as well as simplify the important principles he consistently promoted. He ensured that the many conversations he had with different people during his ministry were passed down through the ages for our learning. This allows us to see the various ways in which truth affects people; we observe the different expressions of emotions, the journey of belief, the growth of character, and the intentions of Infinite Mercy. The highest teachings and the best principles are presented through examples, and we understand what they are by witnessing what they achieve. The sacred history connects us with people who share similar feelings to our own and, through its captivating details, lets us share in their hopes and fears, joys and sorrows, challenges and triumphs. We are not brought into the school of Socrates, the academy of Plato, or the Lyceum of Aristotle, where some wise sayings were undoubtedly given to the followers of these great thinkers; instead, we are guided from abstract ideas to real life. Christianity is taught by showing us Christians—humility through examples of the humble—repentance through the presentation of the repentant—charity by highlighting the generous—and faith by illustrating, as in the story before us, the true believer.
The case was this. Jesus went into the coasts of Tyre and Sidon, where, having entered into a house, he intimated his wish for privacy and concealment, "but he could not be hid;" upon which an ingenious writer [32] observes: "I think I see three principal reasons for the conduct of our Saviour; 'He would have no man know it.' Why? because he would fulfil the prophecy--explain his own character--and leave us an example of virtue. Once, 'when great multitudes followed him and he healed them all, he charged them that they should not make him known; that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Esaias the prophet, saying, Behold, my servant shall not cause his voice to be heard in the streets;' that is, he shall not affect popularity, nor stoop to use any artifice to make proselytes. Most likely this was one reason of our Lord's desiring to be concealed on this occasion. Probably, he intended also to explain his own character to the family where he was. Jesus was a person of singular modesty, and a high degree of every virtue that can adorn a man, was a character of the promised Messiah. It was necessary to give frequent proofs by his actions of the frame and temper of his heart, and he discovered the tenderness of a friend to the family where he was, and to his disciples, who were along with him, just as he had done before, when there were so many coming and going, that they had no leisure so much as to eat.' Then 'he said unto his apostles, Come ye yourselves apart into a desert place, and rest awhile. And they departed into a desert place by ship privately.' Further, in the case before us we have a fine example of the conduct proper for men exalted above their fellows. They ought not to make a public show of themselves, nor to display their abilities in vain ostentation. All their abilities should scent of piety and the fear of God. The apostle Paul reproved the Corinthians for abusing extraordinary gifts to make the people think them prophets and spiritual persons, while they ought to have applied them to the 'edifying of the church.' 'God,' adds this apostle, 'is not the author of confusion, but of peace.' For such reasons we suppose our blessed Saviour desired concealment in this house; and so much right had he to rest after a journey, to refresh himself with food and sleep, to retire from the malice of his enemies, and to enjoy all the uninterrupted sweets of privacy, that had not his presence been indispensably necessary to the relief and happiness of mankind, one would have wished to have hushed every breath, and to have banished every foot, lest he should have been disturbed; but he could not be hid."
The situation was this. Jesus went to the regions of Tyre and Sidon, where, after entering a house, he expressed his desire for some privacy and quiet, "but he could not be hidden;" upon which a thoughtful writer [32] notes: "I see three main reasons for our Saviour's actions; 'He didn't want anyone to know.' Why? Because he wanted to fulfill the prophecy—clarify his own character—and set an example of virtue for us. At one point, 'when large crowds followed him and he healed them all, he instructed them not to reveal his identity; so that what was spoken by the prophet Isaiah might be fulfilled, saying, Behold, my servant shall not raise his voice in the streets;' meaning, he would not seek popularity or resort to tricks to gain followers. This was likely one reason for our Lord's desire for privacy on this occasion. He probably also intended to clarify his character to the family he was with. Jesus was known for his extraordinary modesty and a high level of every virtue that reflects a great man, which was a characteristic of the promised Messiah. It was essential for him to frequently demonstrate through his actions the nature of his heart, showing kindness to the family he was with and to his disciples, just as he had previously done when so many were coming and going that they didn’t even have time to eat.' Then 'he said to his apostles, Come, let’s go away to a remote place and rest for a while.' They departed to a secluded spot by boat in private.' Moreover, in this instance, we have a strong example of how people in elevated positions should act. They should not seek to showcase themselves publicly, nor flaunt their skills for the sake of vanity. All their talents should reflect piety and a reverence for God. The apostle Paul admonished the Corinthians for misusing extraordinary gifts to give the impression that they were prophets and spiritual individuals, when they should have been using them for the 'uplifting of the church.' 'God,' this apostle adds, 'is not the author of confusion, but of peace.' For these reasons, we believe our blessed Saviour sought privacy in this house; and so much right had he to rest after a journey, to rejuvenate himself with food and sleep, to escape the malice of his enemies, and to savor the uninterrupted joys of solitude, that if his presence hadn’t been absolutely necessary for the relief and happiness of humanity, one would have wished for silence and stillness all around, to avoid disturbing him; but he could not be hidden."
Having heard of the miracles which Christ performed, for long since his fame had gone throughout all Syria, a woman of Canaan, a Syrophenician by birth, and a Greek by religion, [33] repaired to the house with haste, under the pressure of a severe domestic calamity. Her young daughter had an unclean spirit, or, as she expressed it, was "grievously vexed with a devil." There was something peculiarly awful and mysterious in the nature of this affliction, which was very prevalent in the days of Christ, and is frequently mentioned by the historians of the New Testament. It does not appear any longer to afflict mankind, and if the reason be inquired, perhaps it is that the victorious power of Messiah might he displayed in the expulsion of evil spirits, by his presence upon the earth.
Having heard about the miracles Christ performed, since his fame had spread all over Syria, a Canaanite woman, a Syrophenician by birth and a Greek by religion, [33] hurried to the house in desperation due to a severe family crisis. Her young daughter was possessed by an unclean spirit, or as she put it, was "terribly troubled by a demon." There was something particularly horrifying and mysterious about this affliction, which was quite common during Christ's time and is often mentioned by the New Testament historians. It doesn't seem to affect people anymore, and if we try to understand why, it might be because the powerful presence of the Messiah was demonstrated through the casting out of evil spirits while he was on earth.
This Syrophenician woman then was induced to hasten to Jesus, in consequence of the distressing situation of her poor possessed daughter. [34] How often has affliction proved the successful messenger of Providence, when every other failed! It has gone out into the "highways and hedges," and "compelled them to come in," when no entreaty or remonstrance could overcome the obduracy of sinners, and thus has replenished the table of mercy with thankful guests. It cannot be doubted, that a part of the felicity of glorified spirits in eternity will consist in tracing the mysterious goodness of God in conducting them through a variety of painful dispensations in the present world; and it is by no means improbable, that the very events of life, which once occasioned the greatest perplexity, and filled the mind with the most overwhelming anxieties, will hereafter prove the noblest sources of gratitude, and the strongest incentives to praise. A personal or a relative affliction, which agonizes the soul by the suddenness of its occurrence, or by its dreadful nature, which embitters life, distracts the mind, confuses every scheme, and confounds every hope, has often proved the real, though perhaps unknown or unacknowledged means of turning the feet of the transgressor into the way of peace. It has led the wayward mind to reflection, and the wandering heart to its rest. It has proved the first effectual means of exciting attention to religion; it has subdued and softened the mind, and subjected it to divine teachings; and the once untractable rebel has become tamed into submission, penitence, and obedience. In this manner affliction is often essentially connected with salvation, and the apostolic statement pleasingly realized; "Our light affliction, which is but for a moment, worketh for us a far more exceeding and eternal weight of glory."
This Syrophenician woman was prompted to rush to Jesus because of the troubling situation of her poor possessed daughter. [34] How often has suffering proven to be the effective messenger of Providence, when everything else has failed! It has gone out into the "highways and hedges," and "compelled them to come in," when no plea or argument could break the stubbornness of sinners, thus filling the table of mercy with grateful guests. There’s no doubt that part of the happiness of glorified souls in eternity will involve recognizing the mysterious goodness of God in guiding them through various painful experiences in this world; and it’s quite possible that the very events in life that once caused the greatest confusion and filled the mind with overwhelming worries will later become the best sources of gratitude and the strongest motivations for praise. A personal or family hardship, which torments the soul with its suddenness or terrible nature, which makes life bitter, distracts the mind, complicates every plan, and shatters every hope, has often turned the transgressor's heart towards the way of peace, even if this is unknown or unacknowledged. It has led the wayward mind to reflect and the wandering heart to find rest. It has often been the first effective means of catching someone’s attention to religion; it has softened and humbled the mind, exposing it to divine teachings; and the once stubborn rebel has become compliant through submission, repentance, and obedience. In this way, suffering is frequently closely linked with salvation, and the apostolic statement resonates beautifully: "Our light affliction, which is but for a moment, works for us a far more exceeding and eternal weight of glory."
When this poor woman came to Jesus, she fell at his feet, explained her situation, and earnestly entreated his kind interposal. Disregarding every spectator, waiting for no formal introduction, and convinced of his mighty power, she rushed into his presence, and with all the vehemence of maternal agony, urged her suit.
When this poor woman approached Jesus, she fell at his feet, shared her situation, and urgently asked for his help. Ignoring everyone around her, not waiting for any formal introduction, and believing in his great power, she hurried into his presence and with all the intensity of a mother’s pain, pleaded her case.
Her conduct evinced great humility. She not only assumed the attitude, but felt the spirit of a suppliant. It does not appear that the external appearance of Jesus was in any respect remarkable, for on some occasions where he was unknown, he was equally unnoticed. When he sat over against the treasury observing the poor widow, he attracted no particular attention--when he visited the sick and dying at the pool of Bethesda, he was not at first recognized as any extraordinary personage, and the prophet intimates that he possessed "no form nor comeliness: but his visage was marred more than any man, and his form more than the sons of men." It was before the majesty of his character this Syrophenician woman bowed with holy reverence and humble admiration. Conscious of having no claim upon his notice, but such as her affliction conferred--and this indeed was to him, who "went about doing good," no insignificant recommendation--and overawed by a deep sense both of her own unworthiness, and his greatness and goodness, she "fell at his feet." O, that with genuine prostration of spirit, we always presented ourselves before the Lord! This is essential to success in all our applications to the "throne of grace." Divested of this quality, our best services will prove but religious mockery and useless parade; for "God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble."
Her behavior showed great humility. She not only took on the role but also felt the spirit of a petitioner. It doesn't seem like Jesus's outward appearance was remarkable in any way, because there were times he went unnoticed when he was unknown. When he sat near the treasury observing the poor widow, nobody paid him much attention. When he visited the sick and dying at the pool of Bethesda, at first, they didn't recognize him as someone extraordinary, and the prophet suggests he had "no form nor comeliness: but his visage was marred more than any man, and his form more than the sons of men." It was before the greatness of his character that this Syrophenician woman bowed with holy respect and humble admiration. Aware that she had no claim for his attention except what her suffering gave her—which was certainly a meaningful credential for him, who “went about doing good”—and deeply aware of both her own unworthiness and his greatness and kindness, she "fell at his feet." Oh, that we would always come before the Lord with genuine humility of spirit! This is crucial for success in all our requests to the "throne of grace." Without this quality, our best efforts will merely be religious pretense and empty show; for "God resists the proud, but gives grace to the humble."
The language of this woman is highly impassioned, and indicative of extreme earnestness. She besought "him that he would cast forth the devil out of her daughter;" she "cried out," like one overwhelmed with grief, "Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou Son of David!" The case is completely her own. The precious life for which she pleads is dear as her own existence. But who can realize, or what language can express her feelings? The affectionate mother alone, who has watched over the sick or dying bed of a languishing daughter, or the agonized parent who has seen some mighty and incurable disorder befall his child--some member withered--some essential faculty enfeebled or destroyed--perhaps reason distracted; can imagine the emotions of that moment when the woman exclaimed, "Have mercy on me!!" What reason have we to be grateful for domestic health, while many are afflicted by the severest trials!
The words of this woman are full of passion and show her deep sincerity. She pleaded with “him to cast the devil out of her daughter;” she “cried out,” like someone overwhelmed with sorrow, “Have mercy on me, O Lord, Son of David!” This situation is entirely personal for her. The precious life she’s fighting for is as important to her as her own. But who can truly understand, or what words can capture, her feelings? Only a loving mother who has cared for a sick or dying daughter, or a heartbroken parent who has witnessed a serious and incurable illness in their child—perhaps seeing a limb withered, an essential ability weakened or lost, or even reason disrupted—can begin to imagine the emotions she felt at that moment when the woman cried, “Have mercy on me!!” What reason do we have to be thankful for our family’s health while so many endure such painful struggles?
We have here a remarkable specimen of faith. When, the father of the young man who had a dumb spirit brought him to Jesus, "If," said he, after describing his case, "if thou canst do any thing, have compassion on us, and help us." This was an implication deregatory to the glory, and disparaging to the power of the Son of God. It implied at least a doubt of his capacity to afford the requisite assistance, and consequently occasioned the remonstrance; "If thou canst believe, all things are possible to him that believeth." q.d. "The question is not whether I possess power, but whether you can exercise faith. Nothing obstructs my benevolent exertion but human infidelity. This, and this only, is the great barrier, the insurmountable impediment to the more universal display of my character, and the multiplication of my wonderful works" This woman, however, expressed no suspicion, intimated no doubt; but, with unhesitating confidence, addressed him as the "Lord, the Son of David."
We have here an amazing example of faith. When the father of the young man with a mute spirit brought him to Jesus, he said, "If you can do anything, please have compassion on us and help us." This suggested a lack of respect for the glory and power of the Son of God. It implied at least some doubt about His ability to provide the needed help and led to the response, "If you can believe, everything is possible for the one who believes." In other words, "The issue isn't whether I have the power; it's whether you can have faith. The only thing that blocks my ability to help is human unbelief. This is the true barrier, the insurmountable obstacle to revealing my character fully and performing more of my miraculous works." However, this woman showed no doubt or suspicion; she addressed Him with unwavering confidence as "Lord, the Son of David."
"O blessed Syrophenician, who taught thee this abstract of divinity? What can we Christians confess more than the Deity, the humanity, and the Messiahship of our glorious Saviour? His Deity as Lord, his humanity as a son, his Messiahship as the son of David. Of all the famous progenitors of Christ, two are singled out by way of eminence, David and Abraham, a king and a patriarch; and though the patriarch was first in time, yet the king is first in place; not so much for the dignity of his person, as the excellence of the promise, which, as it was both later and fresher in memory, so more honorable. To Abraham was promised multitude and blessing of seed, to David perpetuity of dominion. So as, when God promiseth not to destroy his people, it is for Abraham's sake; when not to extinguish the kingdom, it is for David's sake. Had she said, 'the Son of Abraham,' she had not come home to this acknowledgment. Abraham is the father of the faithful, David of the kings of Judea and Israel; there are many faithful, there is but one king; so as in this title she doth proclaim him the perpetual king of his church, the rod or flower which should come from the root of Jesse, the true and only Saviour of the world. Whoso shall come unto Christ to purpose, must come in the right style; apprehending a true God, a true man, a true God and man: any of these severed from other, makes Christ an idol, and our prayers sin." [35]
"O blessed Syrophenician, who taught you this understanding of divinity? What can we Christians confess more than the divinity, humanity, and Messiahship of our glorious Savior? His divinity as Lord, his humanity as a son, and his Messiahship as the son of David. Among all the notable ancestors of Christ, two stand out: David and Abraham, a king and a patriarch; and although the patriarch came first in time, the king is first in importance; not just because of the dignity of his status, but because of the significance of the promise, which, being later and more vivid in memory, is therefore more honorable. To Abraham was promised a multitude and blessing of descendants, while to David was promised an everlasting reign. So when God promises not to destroy his people, it is for Abraham's sake; when he promises not to end the kingdom, it is for David's sake. Had she said, 'the Son of Abraham,' she wouldn't have made this acknowledgment. Abraham is the father of the faithful, David is the father of the kings of Judea and Israel; there are many faithful, but only one king; thus in this title she proclaims him the eternal king of his church, the branch or flower that would come from the root of Jesse, the true and only Savior of the world. Whoever comes to Christ with intent must come in the right way; recognizing him as true God, true man, and true God and man: any of these separated from the others makes Christ an idol, and our prayers sinful." [35]
The disadvantageous circumstances of this woman illustrate the superiority of her faith. There is no evidence of her having seen the Saviour before, much less of her having been a witness of his miraculous works. She had only heard the report of them in her distant residence, and yet, under the guidance of that Spirit who wrought conviction in her mind, hastened to cast herself at his feet. Hers was the blessedness of those who have "not seen, and yet have believed." What a fine contrast do her faith and zeal exhibit to the conduct of the Scribes and Pharisees of the Jewish nation, who in defiance of evidence, of signs and wonders daily performed before their eyes, persisted not only in rejecting Christ as the Messiah, but in plotting against his life. She beheld the rising brightness of the Sun of Righteousness, and was attracted by his glory, though at a distance; whilst they who were near shut their eyes against his heavenly light. She was, therefore, not only distinguished from her fellow-countrywomen, but from the mass of the Jewish people, who voluntarily forfeited their noblest privileges; and, under the influence of the basest prejudice, eventually completed the long train of their iniquities in rejecting and stoning the prophets, by crucifying the Son of God.
The difficult situation of this woman highlights the strength of her faith. There's no sign that she had ever seen the Savior before, let alone witnessed his miraculous acts. She had only heard about them from far away, yet guided by the Spirit that sparked conviction in her heart, she hurried to kneel at his feet. She experienced the blessedness of those who have "not seen, and yet have believed." Her faith and enthusiasm stand in stark contrast to the actions of the Scribes and Pharisees of the Jewish nation, who, despite the clear evidence of signs and wonders happening right before them, not only rejected Christ as the Messiah but also plotted against his life. She saw the dawning light of the Sun of Righteousness and was drawn to his glory, even from a distance; while those who were close chose to ignore his divine light. Therefore, she was set apart from her fellow countrywomen, as well as from the wider Jewish community, who willingly gave up their greatest privileges and, driven by deep-seated prejudice, completed their long history of wrongdoing by rejecting and stoning the prophets, ultimately crucifying the Son of God.
Happy would it be for the best interests of mankind, did the annals of succeeding ages present no other specimens of the same infatuation! But, alas! similar follies are reacted every day. Amidst the most favourable circumstances for spiritual improvement, what awful degeneracy of character exists! Multitudes who have enjoyed the best means, who have been religiously educated, repeatedly admonished, and carefully superintended; who have been taught the holy Scriptures from their youth--who have been led to the house of God, and had "line upon line, and precept upon precept"--on whose behalf a thousand supplications have been presented to heaven, and over whom ten thousand thousand tears have been shed--have continued to manifest an aversion against the claims of truth, and the disobedience of spirit to the commands of Christ. Like the barren fig-tree, they have remained unproductive of any good fruits, notwithstanding unusual cultivation; and have been unsightly as well as useless "cumberers of the ground;"--on the other hand, some whose early habits and irreligious connections were singularly unfavorable to piety, have nevertheless been "brought out of darkness into marvellous light" Our privileges enhance our responsibility: let us, therefore, anxiously avoid the misconduct of the Jews, and beware lest those who have fewer means of improvement, advance, through a better use of them, to higher degrees of spiritual attainment and excellence.
It would be great for the best interests of mankind if future generations didn't show any more examples of such foolishness! But sadly, similar mistakes happen every day. Even in the best situations for spiritual growth, there is such a terrible decline in character! Many people who have had the best resources, who were raised in religious environments, constantly warned, and carefully guided; who have been taught the holy Scriptures from a young age—who have been taken to church, and received "line upon line, and precept upon precept"—for whom countless prayers have been offered to heaven and for whom innumerable tears have been shed—still show resistance to the truth and a rebellious spirit towards the commands of Christ. Like the barren fig tree, they remain unproductive despite extraordinary care; they have become unsightly and merely "cumberers of the ground." On the other hand, some who started with unfavorable habits and irreligious associations have still been "brought out of darkness into marvelous light." Our advantages increase our responsibility: let’s, therefore, carefully avoid the mistakes of the Jews and be cautious that those with fewer opportunities for growth don’t progress to higher levels of spiritual achievement and excellence through better use of what they have.
The humility, the earnestness, and the faith we have been contemplating, it is natural to expect, met with a welcome reception. It is true that mankind often repay confidence with coldness, and shut the hand and the heart against the most importunate entreaties. It is true there are wolves in sheep's clothing, monsters in human form, who aggravate by unkindness the wounds which Providence has inflicted, and who tear and devour as their prey those whom they should supply as their pensioners; but Jesus was "the Lamb of God"--he was "touched with the feeling of our infirmities"--he "went about doing good"--he pronounced blessings on "the merciful"--he was no stranger to personal suffering--it was his nature to sympathize--his element to relieve--the grand predicted feature of his gentle character, that he should "come down like rain upon the mown grass," and should "spare the poor and needy." Who can express the tenderness of that spirit which cherished "pity for us in our low estate" while surrounded by the glories of his Father's throne, and charmed with the harps of heaven, voluntarily descending into this vale of affliction to dry up the tears that flow so copiously from the mourner's eye! We are prepared then, to witness the overflowings of tenderness in his reception of this afflicted mother! But, lo! "he answered her not a word." Mysterious silence! And what were thy feelings, O thou agonized stranger, in these moments of sad suspense? And what explanation can be offered for this extraordinary conduct? Had she escaped his notice amidst the crowd? Had she fallen unobserved at his feet? Did he not then hear that piercing cry--that powerful appeal--that humble entreaty--those words of agony and of faith?--Yes--but "he answered her not A WORD!"
The humility, earnestness, and faith we've been thinking about deserve a warm reception. It's true that people often respond to trust with indifference, shutting their hearts and hands against even the most urgent pleas. There are those who pretend to be kind but are actually cruel, worsening the wounds that life has dealt and prey on those they should help. But Jesus was "the Lamb of God"—he was "in tune with our weaknesses"—he "went about doing good"—he blessed "the merciful"—he knew personal suffering—he naturally sympathized—his purpose was to help—his gentle nature was foretold, that he would "come down like rain on mowed grass" and would "spare the poor and needy." Who can capture the tenderness of that spirit which felt "pity for us in our low state" while surrounded by the glories of his Father's throne, enchanted by the music of heaven, yet voluntarily coming down to this world of suffering to wipe away the tears of the grieving? We are ready then to see the outpouring of compassion in his response to this troubled mother! But, wait! "he answered her not a word." Mysterious silence! And what were your feelings, O you anguished stranger, in these moments of painful uncertainty? And what explanation can we offer for this unusual response? Did she go unnoticed in the crowd? Did she fall at his feet without him seeing? Did he not hear that heart-wrenching cry—that desperate plea—that humble request—those words filled with pain and faith?—Yes—but "he answered her not A WORD!"
This is not, indeed, a solitary instance. When the adulterous transgressor was brought into his presence by the Scribes and Pharisees, Jesus "stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground as though he heard them not;" but this was to disappoint their malice, whose sole purpose was to obtain some materials for his accusation. When he was attacked by reiterated calumnies in the presence of Pilate, "he answered nothing;" because he would manifest a holy indignation against their unreasonable and exasperating conduct. The railing of the impenitent malefactor, who was his fellow-sufferer on the cross, could provoke no reply; although this dignified reserve was instantly changed into language of gracious promise, when the other entreated his mercy. He could not remain a moment inattentive to the penitent's petition, and far exceeded his desires; for he requested only a place in his memory, but he gave him a place in his kingdom. Delightful pledge, that "he will do for us exceeding abundantly above all we ask or think."
This isn't an isolated case. When the adulterous sinner was brought before him by the Scribes and Pharisees, Jesus "bent down, and with his finger wrote on the ground as if he didn't hear them;" but this was to thwart their malicious intent, which was solely to gather evidence for his accusation. When he faced repeated slanders in front of Pilate, "he said nothing;" because he wanted to show a holy anger against their unreasonable and annoying behavior. The insults from the unrepentant criminal, who was crucified beside him, didn't elicit a response; although this dignified silence quickly turned into a promise of grace when the other asked for his mercy. He couldn't ignore the penitent's plea for even a moment, and he went far beyond what the man hoped for; he only asked for a place in his memory, but Jesus gave him a place in his kingdom. What a wonderful promise, that "he will do for us far more abundantly than all we ask or think."
If we were unable to discover any satisfactory reason for his silence, when in the most supplicating attitude and with the profoundest humility the Syrophenician woman besought him to restore her daughter, it would he the height of imprudence to impeach his benevolence. His general conduct, the kindness of all his other actions, the gentleness of his words, the universal benignity of his deportment, would forbid our imputing this apparent deviation from his general goodness to any other than some latent cause, which it might not have been necessary or proper to disclose, or the statement of which the brevity of the inspired narrative precluded. But too frequently we misjudge, and even murmur against the divine proceedings, because our limited capacities cannot trace their ultimate design, or even their present connections and combinations. With a characteristic presumption we act as if we expected that the plans of Heaven ought to be submitted to our inspection, or stopped in their progress to await our approval; whereas it is neither proper nor possible to disclose to us more than "parts of his ways!"
If we couldn't find any good reason for his silence, especially when the Syrophenician woman begged him so humbly to heal her daughter, it would be completely unwise to question his kindness. His overall behavior, the compassion shown in all his other actions, the gentleness of his words, and the kindness he displayed would prevent us from attributing this seeming inconsistency to anything other than some hidden reason that he may not have needed or wanted to reveal, or perhaps the brief nature of the inspired narrative just didn't allow for it. But too often we jump to conclusions and even complain about divine actions because our limited understanding can’t connect the dots or see their ultimate purpose. With a sense of entitlement, we act as if we expect the plans of Heaven to be laid out for us or to be paused until we give our approval; however, it's neither fitting nor feasible for us to be shown more than "parts of his ways!"
Many reasons, however, might be assigned for this remarkable silence. The principal one was probably the purpose of proving her character, and encouraging a perseverance, which from the strength of her faith he knew would be the result, and which would eventually illustrate both her character and his own. How many, had they even advanced to this point of submission, would have withdrawn in disgust, and misrepresented the conduct they could not comprehend! But she is not offended at this seeming neglect. She does not exclaim, with the sarcastic vehemence of disappointed hope, "Is this Son of David--the wonder-worker of Israel--the meek, the compassionate, the condescending person of whom we have heard such extraordinary reports?--Am I to be neglected while others are relieved?"--but patiently waits the result, still persevering in her suit. "O woman, great is thy faith!" Of this we may be fully assured on every occasion of supplicating the throne of mercy, that if the "cry of the humble" he deferred, it is not "forgotten," and that the trials to which we are exposed always bear a well-adjusted proportion both to the necessity of the case and to our capacity of endurance.
Many reasons might explain this remarkable silence. The main one was likely to test her character and encourage a perseverance that, given her strong faith, he knew would result, ultimately showcasing both her character and his own. How many people, if they had reached this point of submission, would have backed out in disgust and misrepresented behavior they couldn’t understand! But she isn’t offended by this apparent neglect. She doesn’t shout with sarcastic bitterness of disappointed hope, "Is this the Son of David—the miracle worker of Israel—the gentle, compassionate, humble person we’ve heard such amazing stories about? Am I to be ignored while others are helped?" Instead, she patiently waits for the outcome, continuing to make her plea. "O woman, great is your faith!" We can be fully assured in every instance of asking for mercy that if the "cry of the humble" is delayed, it is not "forgotten," and that the challenges we face are always appropriately balanced with the necessity of the situation and our ability to endure.
In this interval the disciples interceded for her dismission with the answer she requested. They pleaded her vehement importunity; and, as Christ had expressed a wish for concealment, they probably supposed her cries would excite an unwelcome degree of popular observation. To this he answered, "I am not sent, but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel." As this was said in the hearing of this distressed woman, it was not only calculated to silence the disciples, but to discourage the suppliant. A mere inattention to her urgent plea might have been imputed to some deep abstraction of mind, which we know sometimes renders a person in the full exercise of his faculties as indifferent and insensible to external objects or sounds as if he were in a profound sleep; or he might have been supposed to be occupied in meditating upon the woman's distress, and devising means to afford her an effectual and speedy assistance: but his language is an argument to justify his disregard, rather than to solicit time for consideration. His commission was to Israel; he was a "minister of the circumcision;" and that period was not yet arrived when "the Gentiles were to be brought to his light, and kings to the brightness of his rising." That favoured people, who were for so many ages distinguished by celestial visitations, were destined notwithstanding their ingratitude, to receive the first communications of the Son of God. Amongst them he came to labour, to preach, and to die!
In this time, the disciples asked for her dismissal with the answer she wanted. They argued her desperate insistence; since Christ had expressed a desire for privacy, they likely thought her cries would draw unwanted attention. He replied, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel." Since this was said in front of the distressed woman, it not only aimed to quiet the disciples but also to discourage her plea. Ignoring her urgent request might have been seen as a sign of deep thought, which can sometimes make a person seem as indifferent and unaware of their surroundings as if they were in a deep sleep; or it could be thought that he was focused on her suffering, figuring out how to give her effective and quick help. But his words argue that he disregarded her rather than needed time to think. His mission was to Israel; he was a "minister to the Jews" and that time hadn’t come yet when "the Gentiles would come to his light, and kings to the brightness of his rising." That favored group, who had been blessed with divine encounters for so long, was intended—despite their ingratitude—to be the first to hear from the Son of God. He came to work, to preach, and to die among them!
The solicitude of the disciples on this occasion was highly laudable. It becomes the fellow-members of the great mystical body to sympathize with each other. By this we fulfil the law of nature, but especially "the law of Christ:" and in nothing can this sentiment be better expressed than in fervent available prayers. "As the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body; so also is Christ. For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.... And whether one member suffer, all the members suffer with it, or one member be honoured, all the members rejoice with it. Now ye are the body of Christ and members in particular."
The concern shown by the disciples in this situation was truly commendable. It's important for fellow members of the great mystical body to support one another. By doing this, we fulfill the law of nature, and especially "the law of Christ." There's no better way to express this sentiment than through heartfelt, meaningful prayers. "As the body is one and has many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body; so also is Christ. For by one Spirit we are all baptized into one body, whether we are Jews or Gentiles, whether we are slaves or free; and we have all been made to drink into one Spirit. And if one member suffers, all the members suffer with it, or if one member is honored, all the members rejoice with it. Now you are the body of Christ and individually members of it."
Driven perhaps to the very borders of despondency, and yet unwilling to relinquish every hope, this agonizing mother again rushed forward, prostrated herself at the Saviour's feet, and with impetuous zeal earnestly cried out, "Lord, help me!" She seemed reduced to the last extremity; and yet, like Esther, who resolved to go in to the king, whether she perished or not, and like Jonah, tossing about amongst the waves of the ocean, determining "to look again towards the holy temple of Jehovah," she ventured to renew her application, and in language implying her conviction of his ability, and a glimmering hope of his willingness, she does not merely say, "Lord, deign some answer--even if it be a refusal," but "Lord, help me!" She was vigorous in faith. She "laid hold of the horns of the altar"--she "cleaved to the Lord with full purpose of heart." Reader, what shall we say?--"Go thou and do likewise."
Driven maybe to the edge of despair, yet still not ready to give up all hope, this suffering mother rushed forward again, fell at the Savior's feet, and passionately cried out, "Lord, help me!" She seemed to be at her wit's end; and yet, like Esther, who decided to approach the king whether she lived or died, and like Jonah, tossed about in the ocean waves, deciding "to look again towards the holy temple of Jehovah," she dared to renew her plea. With words that showed her belief in His power and a flicker of hope for His willingness, she didn't just say, "Lord, give me some answer—even if it's a no," but "Lord, help me!" She was strong in her faith. She "held onto the horns of the altar"—she "clung to the Lord with all her heart." Reader, what can we say?—"Go and do the same."
Her entreaties obtain an answer, Jesus turns to address the suppliant. He is no longer deaf to her petitions or blind to her tears. Her throbbing heart beats with unutterable emotion, and at that glad moment she is all ear to the long-sought reply. "Who now can expect other than a fair and yielding answer to so humble, so faithful, so patient a suppliant? What can speed well, if a prayer of faith from the knees of humility succeeds not? And yet behold, the further she goes the worse she fares: her discouragement is doubled with her suit. 'It is not meet to take the children's bread and to cast it to dogs.' First, his silence implied a contempt, then his answer defended his silence; now his speech expresses and defends his contempt. Lo, he hath turned her from a woman to a dog, and, as it were, spurns her from his feet with a harsh repulse. What shall we say?--Is the Lamb of God turned lion? Doth that clear fountain of mercy run blood? O Saviour, did ever so hard a word fall from those mild lips? Thou calledst Herod fox--most worthily, he was crafty and wicked; the Scribes and Pharisees a generation of vipers, they were venomous and cruel; Judas a devil, he was both covetous and treacherous. But here was a woman in distress, and distress challenges mercy; a good woman, a faithful suppliant, a Canaanitish disciple, a Christian Canaanite, yet rated and whipped out for a dog by thee who wert all goodness and mercy! How different are thy ways from ours! Even thy severity argues favour. The trial had not been so sharp if thou hadst not found the faith so strong, if thou hadst not meant the issue so happy. Thou hadst not driven her away as a dog, if thou hadst not intended to admit her for a saint; and to advance her so much for a pattern of faith, as thou depressedst her for a spectacle of contempt." [36]
Her pleas get a response, and Jesus turns to speak to her. He is no longer ignoring her requests or overlooking her tears. Her racing heart is filled with overwhelming emotion, and at that joyful moment, she is ready to hear the long-awaited reply. "Who could expect anything other than a kind and accepting reply to such a humble, faithful, and patient supplicant? What can go well if a heartfelt prayer from the knees of humility is not answered? And yet, the further she goes, the worse it gets for her: her discouragement grows alongside her plea. 'It isn't right to take the children's bread and throw it to the dogs.' First, his silence suggested disdain, then his answer justified that silence; now his words express and reinforce his contempt. Look, he has reduced her from a woman to a dog, and seems to push her away with a harsh rejection. What shall we say? Is the Lamb of God acting like a lion? Does that clear fountain of mercy flow with blood? Oh Savior, did such a harsh word ever come from your gentle lips? You called Herod a fox—rightly so, he was sly and wicked; the Scribes and Pharisees a brood of vipers, they were poisonous and cruel; Judas a devil, he was both greedy and treacherous. But here is a woman in distress, and distress calls for mercy; a good woman, a faithful supplicant, a Canaanite disciple, a Christian Canaanite, yet treated like a dog by you, who are all goodness and mercy! How different are your ways from ours! Even your harshness suggests favor. The test wouldn’t have been so tough if you hadn’t found her faith so strong, if you hadn’t intended a happy outcome. You wouldn’t have driven her away like a dog if you didn’t mean to accept her as a saint; and to elevate her as a model of faith, as you pushed her down for a spectacle of scorn." [36]
In nothing is the preposterous arrogance of mankind more apparent than in the violence of their national antipathies. Did not the history of all ages and countries furnish an ample catalogue of opprobrious epithets, which they have not scrupled to bestow upon each other, we might wonder that the Jews should have accustomed themselves to speak so contemptuously of others as to call them dogs. Owing to the natural propensity of human nature to villify and degrade, the vocabularies of all languages have been swelled with such odious terms; and till the principles of the Gospel have been universally disseminated, we cannot indulge the hope of seeing the animosities of mankind removed. Then only will they love their neighbours as themselves. It is to be most deeply lamented, that even where Christianity has taken root in the mind, this unholy leaven does not seem to be entirely purged away; and mutual jealousies, bickerings, and recriminations exist, where love should be the ruling principle and bond of union. O, when will the reign of perfect charity, that "thinketh no evil," commence! When will "the whole earth be filled with the glory of the Lord!" When will men of every rank and class associate as Christians, and Christians of every order unite as brethren!
In no way is the ridiculous arrogance of humanity more obvious than in the intensity of their national hostilities. If history didn't provide a long list of insulting names they've unashamedly used against each other, we might wonder why the Jews have gotten used to looking down on others by calling them dogs. Because of the natural tendency of human nature to belittle and demean, every language has been filled with such hateful terms; and until the principles of the Gospel are spread everywhere, we can’t hope to see the animosities of humanity disappear. Only then will they love their neighbors as themselves. It is truly sad that even where Christianity has taken hold in people's hearts, this unholy influence doesn’t seem to be completely removed; and mutual jealousy, arguments, and blame still exist where love should be the main guiding principle and bond of unity. Oh, when will the era of perfect charity, that "thinketh no evil," begin! When will "the whole earth be filled with the glory of the Lord!" When will people of all ranks and classes come together as Christians, and Christians of every kind unite as brothers and sisters!
The term dog in the mouth of our Saviour, and as applied to this distressed supplicant, must not, however, be considered as used in conformity to the vulgar prejudices of his countrymen, but for the double purpose of a sarcastic allusion to the unreasonableness of their degrading views of others, who were Gentiles by birth, and to try still further a faith which he knew would endure the test, and display this persevering woman to the greatest advantage. Jesus Christ must necessarily, in point of personal feeling, have been infinitely superior to all those unworthy littlenesses which were conspicuous in the multitude around him; and as he was acting for the moment, to answer an important purpose, in an assumed character, we cannot be surprised that he should personate a Jew elated with self-conscious superiority, by saying, "it is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs." We are reminded of Joseph, an eminent antitype of Christ, who, though he knew his brethren, and was overflowing with fraternal tenderness, "made himself strange unto them, and spake roughly unto them;" and we are led to reflect also on the impenetrable darkness which, to the human eye, sometimes envelopes the dispensations of Heaven; when, as a pious poet represents it,
The term dog used by our Savior regarding this distressed person shouldn't be seen as a reflection of the common prejudices of his people. Instead, it serves a dual purpose: to sarcastically highlight the unreasonable, degrading views they held of Gentiles, and to further test a faith that he knew would withstand scrutiny, showcasing this determined woman in the best light. Jesus Christ, in his personal feelings, was far above the petty attitudes evident in the crowd around him. As he spoke in this moment to fulfill an important purpose while taking on a certain persona, it's not surprising that he would act as a Jew filled with self-importance when he said, "it is not right to take the children's bread and toss it to the dogs." This reminds us of Joseph, a significant figure like Christ, who, despite knowing his brothers and feeling deep compassion for them, "made himself strange unto them and spoke roughly unto them." It also leads us to think about the impenetrable darkness that can sometimes shroud divine plans from human understanding; as a thoughtful poet suggests,
Behind a frowning providence
He hides a smiling face.
Behind a grim exterior,
He conceals a cheerful expression.
The woman at once acknowledges the charge, but instantly extracts an argument from her very discouragements. "Truth, Lord--the dogs ought not to be fed with the supply designed for the children. I own the general fact, and humbly submit to the painful but obvious application. It is not from any conviction of meriting thy interposing mercy, that I have ventured to solicit it, and to reiterate my plea. I am indeed a sinner--a Gentile--a dog. 'And yet,'if I may pursue the allusion, 'the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table.' One act of kindness I entreat amidst thy boundless liberalities--one word of consolation from thy lips, which drop as the honey and the honeycomb--one, only one supply from thine inexhaustible plenitude of grace and power--one fragment from the table!"
The woman immediately acknowledges the accusation but quickly turns her discouragement into a discussion point. "You're right, Lord—the dogs shouldn't get the food meant for the children. I accept that truth and reluctantly recognize the painful reality it brings. I'm not asking for your mercy because I believe I deserve it; I’m just repeating my request. I truly am a sinner—a Gentile—a dog. 'And yet,' if I can continue with that comparison, 'the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masters' table.' I ask for just one act of kindness amidst your endless generosity—just one word of comfort from you, which is sweeter than honey—just one small blessing from your infinite grace and power—just one crumb from the table!"
It is done!--Joseph unveils himself! Jesus reassumes his proper character! The stern air and attitude of repulsion is dismissed--he smiles with ineffable affection--commends her faith, and with commanding authority bestows the wished-for blessing; and though at so great distance, expels the demon from the afflicted daughter. "Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith; he it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour."
It is done!—Joseph reveals himself! Jesus takes on his true nature again! The serious demeanor and look of disgust are gone—he smiles with deep affection—praises her faith, and with strong authority grants the blessing she desired; and even from such a distance, he casts out the demon from the troubled daughter. "Then Jesus answered and said to her, O woman, great is your faith; let it be done for you as you wish. And her daughter was made well from that very hour."
Such was the result of persevering importunity, which must ever characterize successful prayer, and will necessarily spring from a genuine and deep-rooted faith. We have been contemplating one of the finest specimens of it that ever occurred in the world; and we are solemnly exhorted to the practice of it in the introductory passage to one of our Lord's parables--"Men ought always to pray, and not to faint."
Such was the result of persistent insistence, which must always define successful prayer and will naturally come from a true and deep-seated faith. We have been looking at one of the best examples of it that has ever happened in the world; and we are earnestly encouraged to practice it in the opening lines of one of our Lord's parables--"People should always pray and not give up."
Sometimes people are under the influence of very needless discouragements. They "grow weary and faint in their minds," because they do not meet with immediate success; though this consideration constitutes no essential part of the divine promises, would in many cases be injurious to our best interests, and is by no means characteristic of some of the most remarkable examples of successful prayer. At other times impatience arises from observing that "the Father of lights," to whose wisdom it becomes us to refer every petition, does not answer our requests in the manner which we had anticipated, and, perhaps, dared presumptuously to prescribe. But while in this, or in any other way, we approach God in the spirit of dictation, rather than of faith and submission, we virtually renounce the blessing even whilst we solicit it. From the history of the Syrophenician woman we may learn, that our applications for mercy must be sincere, fervent, and incessant. Whatever delays may occur, it is our happiness to be assured that the ear of Infinite Goodness is always open; "the throne of grace," to which we may approach "boldly," is always accessible. The petitions of faith cannot escape the notice, or be obliterated from the memory, of him to whom they are presented, but will prove ultimately effectual; and, as prayer is the appointed means of divine communication, it is necessary to obtain the blessings of Heaven. "Whosoever asketh, receiveth."
Sometimes people experience unnecessary discouragement. They "grow weary and faint in their minds" because they don't achieve immediate success; even though this expectation isn't a key part of the divine promises, it can often work against our best interests and isn't reflective of the most notable examples of successful prayer. Other times, impatience comes from noticing that "the Father of lights," to whose wisdom we should turn for every request, doesn't respond in the manner we expected, and possibly even foolishly tried to dictate. However, when we approach God with a sense of entitlement instead of faith and submission, we essentially give up the blessing even while asking for it. From the story of the Syrophenician woman, we learn that our pleas for mercy must be genuine, passionate, and persistent. No matter how long it takes, we can be happy knowing that the ear of Infinite Goodness is always open; "the throne of grace," which we can approach "boldly," is always available. The prayers of faith cannot go unnoticed or be forgotten by the one to whom they are directed, and they will ultimately be effective; since prayer is the chosen way to communicate with the divine, it is necessary to receive the blessings of Heaven. "Whosoever asketh, receiveth."
The value of the mercies we are required to seek is such as ought to excite our utmost importunity. If the Syrophenician woman were so eager and so persevering in order to obtain a temporal blessing, surely it becomes us to manifest at least an equal zeal for spiritual good. She entreated the cure of her possessed daughter; we are assured that "ALL things whatsoever we ask in prayer, believing, we shall receive." At the voice of prayer the treasures of grace are unlocked, the windows of heaven opened, the riches of eternity dispensed. The language of petition ascends above the language of praise, and is heard amidst the songs of angels. "O thou that hearest prayer, unto thee shall all flesh come." The interesting consideration, that this woman was a Canaanite, ought not to be overlooked. This people was particularly denounced by Noah in the person of their guilty progenitor, and in the following terms: "Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren." The descendants of Canaan, that is, primarily of Ham, were remarkably wicked and idolatrous. "Their religion," as bishop Newton observes, "was bad, and their morality, if possible, worse; for corrupt religion and corrupt morals usually generate each other, and go hand in hand together." Some centuries after their predicted subjugation to the yoke of Shem and Japheth, the Israelites, under the command of Joshua, smote thirty of their kings, and Solomon made such as were not before extirpated or enslaved his tributaries. The Greeks and Romans afterward subdued Syria and Palestine, and conquered the Tyrians and Carthaginians. Subsequently to this period, the Saracens, and finally the Turks, fastened upon them the iron yoke of servitude.
The importance of the mercy we are called to seek should motivate us to be incredibly persistent. If the Syrophoenician woman was so eager and determined to receive a temporary blessing, we should certainly show at least as much passion for spiritual goodness. She sought healing for her possessed daughter; we are promised that "whatever we ask in prayer, believing, we will receive." Through prayer, the treasures of grace are revealed, the windows of heaven are opened, and the riches of eternity are shared. The language of petition rises above the language of praise and is heard among the songs of angels. "O you who hear prayer, to you shall all flesh come." It's important to note that this woman was a Canaanite. This group was specifically condemned by Noah through the actions of their guilty ancestor, in these words: "Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren." The descendants of Canaan, namely, those from Ham, were notoriously wicked and idolatrous. "Their religion," as Bishop Newton points out, "was corrupt, and their ethics, if possible, were even worse; for corrupt religion and corrupt morals usually fuel each other and go hand in hand." Centuries after their predicted domination under Shem and Japheth, the Israelites, led by Joshua, defeated thirty of their kings, and Solomon made those not eradicated or enslaved pay tribute. Later, the Greeks and Romans conquered Syria and Palestine, taking down the Tyrians and Carthaginians. Eventually, the Saracens, followed by the Turks, imposed on them an oppressive yoke of servitude.
Behold, then, from among the accursed Canaanites, a woman outstrips in zeal and faith thousands, and tens of thousands, who were her superiors in birth and privilege; and Jesus withholds not his blessing from this insignificant Gentile! What an encouragement to the meanest, the obscurest, and the most unworthy, to apply with instant haste to this Almighty Saviour! His free and abundant salvation is dispensed to penitents irrespectively of national distinctions or individual demerit; and, instead of its being derogatory to his dignity to condescend to persons of low estate, he chose to publish his Gospel to the poor, and to "save the children of the needy." "His blood cleanseth from all sin." He came "not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance." We have here a specimen and pledge of the influence of Christ and his salvation. He is become the centre of universal attraction, the powerful magnet of the world, pervading by his influence the moral creation, and gradually drawing all into himself. The designs of mercy were now enlarging, the scale of its operations extending, and the ancient lines of demarcation between Jew and Gentile were overstepped by the zeal of the Lord of Hosts. In the person of this Canaanite we witness the first "lively stone" brought from the Gentile quarry, and placed on the chief corner-stone of the great spiritual edifice of the Christian church. "They shall come," said our Saviour, "from the east and from the west, from the north and from the south."
Look here, from among the cursed Canaanites, a woman stands out in her zeal and faith above thousands, even tens of thousands, who were of higher birth and privilege; and Jesus does not hold back his blessing from this unremarkable Gentile! What a boost for the lowliest, the most obscure, and the least deserving to rush towards this Almighty Savior! His free and abundant salvation is offered to repentant people without regard to national differences or individual shortcomings; and rather than it being beneath his dignity to reach out to those in humble positions, he chose to share his Gospel with the poor and to "save the children of the needy." "His blood cleanses from all sin." He came "not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance." Here, we have a glimpse and assurance of the power of Christ and his salvation. He has become the center of universal attraction, the strong magnet of the world, influencing the moral landscape and gradually drawing everyone toward himself. The plans for mercy are now expanding, the scope of its actions widening, and the old boundaries between Jew and Gentile are being crossed by the zeal of the Lord of Hosts. In the Canaanite woman, we see the first "living stone" taken from the Gentile quarry, laid upon the chief cornerstone of the great spiritual structure of the Christian church. "They shall come," said our Savior, "from the east and from the west, from the north and from the south."
The present condition of the Jews forms an awful contrast, to those clays of boasted pre-eminence, How are they, who once regarded all other nations as dogs, become contemptible in consequence of their treatment of the Son of God, while the cordial reception given him by many Gentile nations has elevated them into the dignity of children! For nearly eighteen centuries the once honored people of the Jews have been dispersed in every direction upon the surface of the globe. They furnish an example of one of these dreadful recriminations of Providence which have sometimes been inflicted on atrocious sinners in their collective and national capacities. Never did the universe before witness so astonishing a spectacle, as a nation destroyed as a nation, but preserved as individuals--preserved to suffer, and to be accounted the offscouring of all things. At this moment they are destitute of a temple, a priest, a sacrifice, a country, and a king. The temporal dominion of their rulers and the succession of their priests have ceased since the destruction of Jerusalem. No oblations and sacrifices now exist. The fire burns no longer on the holy altar--the incense ascends no more from the demolished temple--the flood of ages has swept away the sacred edifices, and Desolation sits enthroned upon their ruins. The house of Israel is, in consequence of the rejection of Christ, become a spectacle to angels and to men--a melancholy monument of wo, on which the hand of recriminating justice has inscribed in legible characters a condemnatory sentence, which is read with silent awe by the inhabitants of heaven, and by every king, and people, and nation of the globe.--But the period of Jewish dispersion is hasting to its close. Party names and ancient prejudices shall soon disappear, and mankind of every class and country be eternally united in one blessed fraternity. "And it shall come to pass in that day, that the Lord shall set his hand again the second time to recover the remnant of his people, which shall be left, from Assyria, and from Egypt, and from Pathros, and from Cush, and from Elam, and from Shinah, and from Hamath, and from the islands of the sea. And he shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth. The envy also of Ephraim shall depart, and the adversaries of Judah shall be cut off: Ephraim shall not envy Judah, and Judah shall not vex Ephraim."--"Other sheep," said Christ, "I have, which are not of this fold; them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice: and there shall be one fold and one shepherd."
The current situation of the Jews is a shocking contrast to the days when they were proudly at the top. How have those who once viewed all other nations as inferior become so lowly due to their treatment of the Son of God, while many Gentile nations warmly embraced Him and were elevated to the status of children? For nearly eighteen centuries, the once-respected Jewish people have been scattered all over the world. They serve as an example of the terrible penalties that Providence sometimes inflicts on wicked sinners in their collective and national forms. Never before has the world seen such an incredible sight: a nation destroyed as a nation but preserved as individuals—preserved to suffer and to be seen as the dregs of society. Right now, they lack a temple, a priest, a sacrifice, a homeland, and a king. Their rulers' earthly power and the line of their priests have ended since the fall of Jerusalem. There are no more offerings and sacrifices. The fire no longer burns on the holy altar—incense no longer rises from the ruined temple—the passage of time has swept away the sacred buildings, and Desolation sits in judgment over their ruins. Because of their rejection of Christ, the house of Israel has become a sight for angels and humans— a sorrowful monument of woe, where the hand of justice has inscribed a condemning sentence that is read with silent awe by the inhabitants of heaven, and by every king, people, and nation on earth. But the time of Jewish dispersion is quickly coming to an end. Divisions and old biases will soon fade away, and people from all backgrounds and nations will be eternally united in one blessed brotherhood. "And it shall come to pass in that day, that the Lord shall set his hand again the second time to recover the remnant of his people, which shall be left, from Assyria, and from Egypt, and from Pathros, and from Cush, and from Elam, and from Shinar, and from Hamath, and from the islands of the sea. And he shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth. The envy also of Ephraim shall depart, and the adversaries of Judah shall be cut off: Ephraim shall not envy Judah, and Judah shall not vex Ephraim."—"Other sheep," said Christ, "I have, which are not of this fold; them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice: and there shall be one fold and one shepherd."
Martha and Mary.
Chapter VII.
Bethany distinguished as the Residence of a pious Family, which consisted of Lazarus and his two Sisters--their diversity of Character--the Faults of Martha, domestic Vanity and fretfulness of Temper--her counterbalancing Excellences--Mary's Choice and Christ's Commendation--Decease of Lazarus--his Restoration to Life at the Voice of Jesus--Remarks on Death being inflicted upon the People of God as well as others--the Triumph which Christianity affords over this terrible Evil--Account of Mary's anointing the Feet of Jesus, and his Vindication of her Conduct.
Bethany was known as the home of a devout family made up of Lazarus and his two sisters. Each of them had distinct personalities—Martha’s flaws included her domestic pride and a tendency to be irritable, but she also had her strengths. Mary made a significant choice that Jesus praised. The story includes Lazarus's death and his miraculous return to life at Jesus's command. It reflects on how death affects both the people of God and everyone else, highlighting the victory Christianity offers over this fearsome reality. Additionally, it recounts the moment Mary anointed Jesus's feet and Jesus's defense of her actions.
Almost every spot in the vicinity of Jerusalem may be regarded as "holy ground." The enraptured imagination cannot traverse this district without recalling the many wonderful transactions that occurred there in different periods of the Jewish history, but especially during the personal residence of the Son of God upon the earth. Within the small circumference of a few miles round the city, what a multitude of great events have taken place! What miracles have been wrought! What mercies have been distributed! What doctrines have been revealed! What characters have appeared! What a development has been made of human nature! What a surprising display of the perfections of the blessed God! What an exhibition of the love of the incarnate Redeemer! Who, then, can think without emotion, of Bethlehem--of Bethpage--of Bethany--of Mount Olivet--of the brook Kedron--of Emmaus--and of Calvary?
Almost every spot around Jerusalem can be considered "holy ground." It's hard to think about this area without recalling the many incredible events that happened here throughout Jewish history, especially during the time that the Son of God lived on Earth. Within just a few miles of the city, so many significant events have occurred! So many miracles have been performed! So many acts of mercy have been shared! So many teachings have been revealed! So many remarkable people have appeared! We've seen such a deep understanding of human nature! We've witnessed an astounding display of God's perfection! And such a demonstration of the love of the incarnate Redeemer! Who can think of Bethlehem, Bethpage, Bethany, Mount Olivet, the brook Kedron, Emmaus, and Calvary without feeling a surge of emotion?
Excepting only that mountain where Jesus "suffered, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God," and where "once in the end of the world" he "put away sin by the sacrifice of himself," the village of Bethany may, perhaps, be considered as the most interesting point in this all-attractive scene. It is situated at the foot of the Mount of Olives, on the way to Jericho. To this neighborhood the Son of God frequently retired for meditation and prayer; thence he began to ride in triumph to Jerusalem; thither he repaired after eating the last supper with his disciples, and there they witnessed his ascending glory and heard his last benediction--for "he led them out as far as to Bethany; and he lifted up his hands and blessed them. And it came to pass, while he blessed them, he was parted from them, and carried up into heaven. And they worshipped him, and returned to Jerusalem with great joy; and were continually in the temple, praising and blessing God."
Except for the mountain where Jesus "suffered, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God," and where "once in the end of the world" he "put away sin by the sacrifice of himself," the village of Bethany might be considered the most interesting point in this beautiful scene. It lies at the foot of the Mount of Olives, on the way to Jericho. The Son of God often went to this area for meditation and prayer; from there, he began his triumphant ride to Jerusalem; there he went after having his last supper with his disciples, and there they witnessed his glory as he ascended and heard his final blessing—because "he led them out as far as to Bethany; and he lifted up his hands and blessed them. And it came to pass, while he blessed them, he was parted from them and carried up into heaven. And they worshipped him and returned to Jerusalem with great joy, and were continually in the temple, praising and blessing God."
Bethany, however, claims our present attention chiefly as being the residence of one of the "households of faith," with whom our Saviour was particularly intimate, and with whose history some remarkable circumstances are connected. It was a small but happy family, consisting of only three members, Lazarus, Martha, and Mary. The two sisters, though united by the ties of nature, and the still dearer bond of grace, were distinguished by a considerable dissimilarity of character, which will furnish us with some instruction. While charmed into an effort to imitate remarkable persons by a description of their excellences, it is of great importance to notice their defects, not only for the purpose of avoiding them, but that we may not be overawed into despondency and paralyzed into inaction by their superiority. Biography, to be useful, must be brought to our level, capacities, and circumstances. We must see excellence that is attainable, and view the same infirmities which are incident to our nature, acting in our sphere, and struggling with perplexities, resistance, vicissitude, and trial, similar to what we ourselves experience. The appeal is powerful when we are called upon to be "followers of them who," though circumstanced as we are, "through faith and patience inherit the promises."
Bethany, however, draws our attention mainly because it's the home of one of the "households of faith," with which our Savior had a special connection, and whose story includes some remarkable events. It was a small but happy family, made up of only three members: Lazarus, Martha, and Mary. Although the two sisters were bonded by family ties and an even deeper spiritual connection, they had significant differences in their personalities, which will provide us with valuable lessons. While it's tempting to try to emulate extraordinary people by highlighting their strengths, it's also important to recognize their flaws, not just to avoid them but so we don’t feel overwhelmed or paralyzed by their greatness. To be truly helpful, biographies need to resonate with our own lives, abilities, and situations. We should see excellence as something achievable and recognize the same weaknesses that come with being human, confronting challenges, resistance, change, and trials similar to what we face. The call becomes powerful when we are urged to be "followers of them who," despite being in similar circumstances, "through faith and patience inherit the promises."
"Once they were mourners here below.
And wet their couch with tears;
They wrestled hard, as we do now,
With sins, and doubts, and fears."
"Once they were mourners down here.
And soaked their bed with tears;
They fought hard, just like we do now,
With sins, doubts, and fears."
A history of angels might, indeed, excite our admiration, but would conduce less to our real improvement than a history of our fellow-creatures. We wish to witness the actions, and to be admitted into the secret feelings, of those who, whatever elevation they may have since obtained, were once in the same probationary state with ourselves, and subjected to the same course of moral discipline. In this view it is desirable to be introduced into the privacies of domestic life. It is in the family and at the fireside we all occupy some station, and have some appropriate duties to discharge; and on this account the narrative before us is pre-eminently attractive. We are led to the native village--the chosen residence--the family--the fireside--the home--of Martha and Mary. We see them in all the undisguised reality of private life, and participate at once their pleasures and their pains. We join the social circle. We hear the Saviour conversing with them. We see them in affliction--the common lot, the patrimony to which are all born--and while we participate their sorrows, learn to sustain and profit by our own.
A history of angels might actually inspire our admiration, but it would contribute less to our real growth than a history of our fellow humans. We want to witness the actions and understand the deep feelings of those who, no matter how high they may have risen since, were once in the same testing phase as us and went through the same moral lessons. In this sense, it’s valuable to be let into the private moments of everyday life. It’s within the family and at home where we all hold a role and have specific responsibilities to fulfill; for this reason, the story we’re looking at is particularly engaging. We are taken to the hometown—the chosen place—the family—the home—of Martha and Mary. We see them in the full honesty of their private lives and experience both their joys and their sorrows. We join their social circle. We hear the Savior talking with them. We see them facing hardship—the common experience, the inheritance to which all are born—and while we share in their grief, we also learn to endure and grow from our own.
In vain, to the great purposes of spiritual improvement, do we read the lives of statesmen, heroes princes, philosophers, poets, orators, and the mighty dead that emblazon the historic page. They excite our astonishment, and perhaps our pity, and some moral lessons may be gained from their reverses or the varieties of their characters; but the most useful history is the history of religion--religion in the village, and in the family--religion as exhibited at Bethany, in the house of Martha and Mary.
In vain, for the important goal of spiritual growth, do we read about the lives of statesmen, heroes, princes, philosophers, poets, orators, and the great figures that fill the pages of history. They amaze us, and perhaps invoke our sympathy, and we can learn some moral lessons from their downfalls or the different sides of their personalities; but the most valuable history is the history of religion—religion in the village and in the family—religion as shown at Bethany, in the home of Martha and Mary.
It is a pleasing peculiarity of this household, that they were all the devoted disciples of Jesus Christ. Lazarus appears to have been a solid, established professor of religion, and of the two sisters it is recorded, they "sat at Jesus's feet." We do not hear of another disciple in the whole village, and all Judea could furnish but few, if any, similar instances of three in a single dwelling; three solitary lights amidst surrounding darkness; three flowers expanding to the newly risen Sun of Righteousness, and blooming in a desolate wilderness. The dispensations of providence and of grace are sometimes mysterious to the human eye, and we feel disposed to inquire into the reasons why so few were touched by divine influences, and bidden to follow Christ during his incarnation? Could not that same commanding authority which drew twelve apostles and seventy disciples into his train, and that same power which kindled the lamp of truth in one village or city, and left another in moral darkness, have filled Judea and the world with the glory of the Lord? Could not that energy which pervades the universe, and imparts such inconceivable fleetness to the morning beam when it irradiates the earth, have spread the knowledge of salvation with equal rapidity, and multiplied the disciples like the drops of dew?--Undoubtedly. No limits can be assigned to divine efficiency; but in the present state no explanations are afforded of the secret principles of his eternal government. Curiosity may often be disposed to inquire, with one of the hearers of Christ, "Lord, are there few that shall be saved?" But Scripture checks such investigations, and admonishes us rather to cherish an availing solicitude for our personal salvation: "Strive to enter in at the strait gate."
It’s an interesting feature of this household that they were all devoted followers of Jesus Christ. Lazarus seems to have been a solid believer, and the two sisters are noted for having "sat at Jesus's feet." We don’t hear about any other disciples in the entire village, and all of Judea could offer very few similar examples of three in a single home; three solitary lights in a surrounding darkness; three flowers blossoming in the light of the newly risen Sun of Righteousness, thriving in a barren wilderness. The workings of providence and grace can sometimes be mysterious to us, and we may find ourselves wondering why so few were influenced by divine grace and called to follow Christ during his time on earth. Couldn’t that same powerful presence that gathered twelve apostles and seventy disciples around him, and that same force that lit the lamp of truth in one village while leaving another in moral obscurity, have filled Judea and the entire world with the glory of the Lord? Couldn’t that energy that fills the universe and brings such incredible speed to the morning light as it brightens the earth have spread the knowledge of salvation just as quickly, multiplying disciples like droplets of dew?—Absolutely. There are no limits to divine power; however, in our current state, no explanations are provided for the hidden principles of his eternal governance. Curiosity might often prompt us to ask, like one of Christ’s listeners, "Lord, are there few that will be saved?" But Scripture discourages such inquiries and encourages us instead to focus on our own salvation: "Strive to enter in at the strait gate."
The state even of the civilized world at this day is truly deplorable. Although whole nations profess the Christian faith, yet every city, every village, and almost every hamlet, contains families in which there is not a single disciple of Jesus. The sun rises and sets upon a prayerless roof. No altar is erected to God--no love exists to the Saviour--nothing to attract his attachment or to furnish a subject for angelic joy--no repentance--no faith--and none of "the peace of God which passeth all understanding." Whatever may be the temporal circumstances of such families, Christian benevolence cannot avoid weeping over their spiritual condition. In many cases, the society admitted into their houses is of a most pernicious class. Uninfluenced by the sentiments of David, who said, "I am a companion of all them that fear thee," the friendships they form are but too plainly indicative of their own principles. You will not see them, like Martha and Mary, choosing the excellent of the earth, and welcoming Christ or his disciples to their tables, to share their comforts, to refine and improve their intercourse; but if they occupy a high station in life, the gay, the dissipated, or the thoughtless--if in an inferior situation, the vulgar, the sordid, the intemperate, and the profane, frequent their dwellings. Religion is in both cases too often treated with ridicule and contempt, vilified as mean-spirited in its principle, and enthusiastic in its pretensions; and the truth of the Gospel treated, as its Author was when upon earth, and would be were he still incarnate, with contemptuous rejection.
The condition of the civilized world today is truly sad. Even though entire nations claim to follow the Christian faith, every city, every village, and almost every small community has families where not a single person follows Jesus. The sun rises and sets on homes without prayer. There’s no altar dedicated to God—no love for the Savior—nothing that draws His affection or brings joy to angels—no repentance—no faith—and none of "the peace of God which surpasses all understanding." Whatever the material circumstances of these families may be, Christian compassion cannot help but mourn their spiritual state. Often, the people they allow into their homes are of a harmful nature. Without sharing David's sentiment of "I am a companion of all who fear you," the friendships they cultivate clearly reflect their own values. You won't see them, like Martha and Mary, choosing the best people and welcoming Christ or His disciples into their homes to share joy and elevate their interactions; instead, if they hold a high social position, they’ll be surrounded by the flashy, the careless, or the indifferent—if they are in a lower position, they’ll associate with the crass, the greedy, the excessive drinkers, and the disrespectful. Religion is often treated with mockery and disdain in both cases, dismissed as weak in its principles and overly enthusiastic in its claims; and the truth of the Gospel is handled with the same contempt that was shown to its Author when He was on earth and would still be if He were incarnate today.
Some pleasing exceptions may be found to these observations. In many families exist at least one example of genuine piety--an Abijah in the impious family of a Jeroboam. There is reason to congratulate young persons especially who dare to be singular, to incur reproach, and to dismiss prejudices. The conquest in such instances is proportionably honorable as the propensity in human nature is powerful to follow a multitude to do evil. Such holy daring possesses great attractions, and the most beneficial consequences have been known to result. The child has become instrumental to the conversion of the parent, the parent to that of the child; the brother has proved a blessing to the sister, the wife to her husband: "for what knowest thou, O wife, whether thou shall save thy husband? or how knowest thou, O man, whether thou shall save thy wife?" In other instances the sword of division is sharpened, and the discordances already existing become more settled, more irreconcileable, and more violent. The natural mind betrays its malignant animosity against the spiritual principle, "and he that is born after the flesh persecutes him that is born after the Spirit." But here the whole family was of "one heart and of one soul." Religion was the law of the family, and the bond of delightful union. They were possessed of one spirit; and, as Bishop Hall observes, "jointly agreed to entertain Christ."
Some positive exceptions can be found to these observations. In many families, there’s at least one example of genuine faith—an Abijah in the godless family of a Jeroboam. Young people, in particular, deserve congratulations for being unique, risking judgment, and letting go of prejudices. The victory in these situations is just as admirable as the natural tendency in human nature to follow the crowd into wrongdoing. This kind of holy boldness is very appealing, and many positive outcomes have been known to arise from it. A child has been instrumental in converting a parent, a parent in converting a child; a brother has been a blessing to a sister, a wife to her husband: "for what do you know, O wife, whether you will save your husband? Or how do you know, O man, whether you will save your wife?" In other cases, division becomes sharper, and existing discord intensifies, becoming more entrenched and more violent. The natural mind shows its wicked hostility toward the spiritual principle, "and he who is born of the flesh persecutes him who is born of the Spirit." But here, the whole family was "of one heart and one soul." Religion was the family's guiding principle and the source of their joyful unity. They shared one spirit; as Bishop Hall notes, they "jointly agreed to entertain Christ."
Can it be doubted, that the favored dwelling of Martha and Mary contained a very large portion of domestic felicity--a felicity founded on the noblest basis, cemented by the tenderest affection, and stamped with an immortal character? The religion of Jesus is indeed calculated to diffuse real happiness wherever it prevails; although, as we have intimated, it may become the occasion of discord in consequence of the perverseness of human nature. Sin has disordered the mental and moral constitution of man, and thrown the world into a state of anarchy. The unbridled dominion of the passions disturbs the peace of the individual, and the harmony of society. Sin makes a man at variance with himself, with his neighbors, with his nearest connections, and with the whole constitution of the universe. He becomes restless as the ocean, impelled by every contrary wind, and tost about by every sportive billow. The desire of happiness exists, but he is ignorant how to obtain it, and pursues those means which only plunge him into greater misery. To this cause may be attributed all the mental distresses and all the bodily afflictions of individuals--the disturbances which too often prevent domestic enjoyment--the bickerings and jealousies of families with their various alliances--the animosities that annoy social life--the intestine broils, ambitious emulations, and endless contentions, that distract a state, with every other form and mode of evil. Hence the importance of promoting that kingdom which is "righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost;" the basis of which is the truth which Christ came into the world to propagate. It is this, and this only, which renders mankind happy in every connection. It will harmonize and felicitate to whatever extent it is diffused. It will allay the discord of families, pacify the turbulence of nations, and silence the din of war. There will be "great joy" in the heart, in the family, in the city, and in the world. Under this influence "the wolf shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf, and the young lion, and the fattling together, and a little child shall lead them.... They shall not hurt nor destroy in all God's holy mountain."
Can we really doubt that Martha and Mary’s home was filled with a great amount of happiness—happiness built on the strongest foundation, bonded by the deepest love, and marked by an everlasting nature? The teachings of Jesus are truly designed to spread genuine happiness wherever they are embraced; although, as we mentioned, they can also lead to conflict because of the flaws in human nature. Sin has disrupted our mental and moral makeup, plunging the world into chaos. The unchecked power of our passions disrupts individual peace and societal harmony. Sin causes a person to be at odds with themselves, their neighbors, their closest relationships, and the entire universe. They become as restless as the sea, pushed by conflicting winds and tossed by every wave. The desire for happiness is there, but they don’t know how to achieve it and instead pursue paths that only lead to greater misery. This is the root of all mental suffering and physical distress—disruptions that often prevent family happiness, the quarrels and jealousies of families with their various connections, the animosities that plague social life, the internal conflicts, ambitious rivalries, and endless disputes that distract a society, along with every other kind of evil. Therefore, it’s crucial to promote the kingdom characterized by "righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Spirit," based on the truth that Christ came to share with the world. It is this, and only this, that brings happiness to humanity in every aspect of life. It will create harmony and joy as far as it spreads. It will ease family conflicts, calm the unrest of nations, and silence the clamor of war. There will be "great joy" in hearts, in families, in cities, and in the world. Under this influence, "the wolf will live with the lamb, and the leopard will lie down with the goat; and the calf and the young lion will feed together, and a little child will lead them.... They will not harm or destroy on all of God’s holy mountain."
One, however, as Martha and Mary were in principle, they differed in character. When our Saviour first entered the house, it appears that they both welcomed him, and listened for a time to his instructions. He was in no haste for any refreshment, but eagerly improved every moment to benefit his beloved friends. It was his meat and drink to do the Father's will, and no kindness could afford him such satisfaction as a devout attention to his words. It was, in fact, less to receive than to communicate that he turned aside on his journey to visit these happy sisters. But if, at first, they both attended to the "gracious words that proceeded out of his mouth," Martha, anxious to furnish a suitable repast for their guest, withdrew to make what she deemed the necessary preparations. Mary continued riveted to the spot by a conversation which she could on no terms relinquish. She would not lose a word. Every faculty was absorbed in attention. Her eldest sister busied herself for sometime with her preparations, till at length becoming impatient, she hastily demanded of Jesus to send Mary to her assistance. This intrusion incurred the memorable censure, "Martha, Martha, thou art careful and troubled about many things, but one thing is needful; and Mary hath chosen that good part which shall not be taken away from her."
One, however, as Martha and Mary were in principle, they differed in character. When our Savior first entered the house, it seems they both welcomed him and listened to his teachings for a while. He wasn't in a hurry for any refreshments but instead used every moment to connect with his beloved friends. Doing the Father's will was what nourished him, and nothing brought him more satisfaction than their sincere attention to his words. In fact, it was less about receiving and more about sharing that made him stop on his journey to visit these happy sisters. But if, at first, they both listened to the "gracious words that came from his mouth," Martha, eager to prepare a proper meal for their guest, stepped away to make what she thought were the necessary arrangements. Mary, on the other hand, stayed completely focused on the conversation she couldn't possibly give up. She didn't want to miss a single word. Every part of her was fully engaged. Her older sister worked on her preparations for a while, but eventually, getting frustrated, she quickly asked Jesus to send Mary to help her. This interruption earned her the well-known response, "Martha, Martha, you are worried and troubled about many things, but one thing is necessary; and Mary has chosen the good part which will not be taken away from her."
The defective points of Martha's character seem to have been two. The first of these was domestic vanity and parade. Upon the arrival of her divine guest she is "cumbered about much serving," anxious not only to show a becoming hospitality, but to provide a great entertainment. In this she betrayed a false estimate of our Saviour's spirit. He who willingly submitted to every deprivation during his earthly career--who suffered hunger, and thirst, and peril, and wretchedness, in every form, although he could have commanded ten legions of angels to guard his life, or to supply his necessities, could not have felt a moment's anxiety respecting the abundance or the quality of the provision. This worthy woman not only knew that he could have turned every stone of the wilderness into bread, had he wished to pamper his appetite by luxurious living, but she had surely sufficient opportunities to perceive his disposition, and the perfect exemption of his mind from any kind of concern about his own accommodation. Her anxiety was therefore mistaken in its object, as well as excessive in its degree. And while remarking upon this subject, O that we could impress upon all the ministers of his word the necessity of imitating the conduct of their Master! It becomes them, as his avowed disciples, and as persons who are perpetually exhorting others to self-denial and courteousness, to manifest no care about their own convenience, to give as little trouble as possible to those who, for the sake of their office and their Master, treat tthemwith kind hospitality, and to receive even a cup of cold water in a spirit corresponding to that in which humble piety bestows it.
The flaws in Martha's character seem to come down to two main issues. The first was her sense of domestic pride and showiness. When her divine guest arrived, she was "distracted by all the preparations," eager not just to offer proper hospitality but to provide an extravagant feast. In doing so, she misjudged our Savior's nature. He who willingly faced every hardship during his time on Earth—who endured hunger, thirst, danger, and suffering in every form, even though he could have called upon ten legions of angels for protection or to meet his needs—would not have worried for a second about the amount or quality of food. This well-meaning woman not only knew that he could have turned every stone in the wilderness into bread, had he wanted to indulge in luxury, but she also had plenty of chances to understand his attitude and how completely free he was from any worries about his comfort. Her anxiety was therefore misplaced as well as excessive. While discussing this, I wish we could impress upon all ministers of his word the importance of following their Master's example! As his open disciples, and as individuals constantly encouraging others to be self-denying and gracious, they should show no concern for their own comfort, create as little inconvenience as possible for those who, out of kindness and respect for their role and their Master, offer them hospitality, and to accept even a simple cup of cold water with the same humble spirit in which it is given.
While thus betraying a false estimate of Christ, Martha's principal fault becomes glaringly conspicuous. She is full of bustle, full of eagerness. Her servants were, probably, dispatched in every direction to prepare a sumptuous meal. Every thing must be in order; every dish in place. The food, the arrangement, the preparation of every description, she was probably solicitous should do her credit, as well as display the undoubted affection which she cherished for her Lord. Who can tell what she lost by her excessive care! He, "in whom dwelt all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge," was, during all this time, conversing with her sister; and would have freely communicated the same instructions to her, had not she precluded herself by needless anxieties.
While showing a misunderstanding of Christ, Martha's main flaw becomes very obvious. She's full of activity and eagerness. Her servants were likely sent out in every direction to prepare an extravagant meal. Everything had to be perfect; every dish in its place. She was probably anxious that the food, the setup, and all the preparations reflected well on her and showed the clear love she had for her Lord. Who can say what she missed out on because of her excessive worry! He, "in whom dwelt all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge," was, during all this time, talking with her sister; and would have freely shared the same teachings with her, had she not shut herself off with unnecessary anxieties.
But while we wonder at this voluntary sacrifice of spiritual advantages, advantages too, which, generally speaking, she did not undervalue, let us ask ourselves whether we have never merited a similar censure, whether we have not been seduced by our worldly cares into a similar and culpable remissness in religious duties? Happily, perhaps, like Martha, we love the Saviour, we avow our attachment, we welcome him in the persons of his representatives into our families; hut, at the same time, forfeit our privileges, lose our opportunities, and suffer temporal concerns to supersede the habitual impression of spiritual realities. Let pious women, especially, take a lesson from this incident. Martha was by no means an unique. She represents a very numerous class of female professors. Here is a glass into which they may look and see a perfect reflection of themselves; and we trust they will not retire from the salutary exhibition of their own blemishes, forgetting what manner of persons they are. Domestic care, like every other, is liable to degenerate into excess. There are many ladies whose piety excites universal admiration, but who, from some constitutional proneness or some acquired habit, bestow a disproportionate, and therefore, on many accounts, highly pernicious concern upon their household arrangements. We are not the apologists of uncleanliness or disorder; but it is possible to be over nice and over anxious: by the former, we may injure the comfort of others, as well as become burdensome even to ourselves; by the latter, we may soon interfere with the superior claims of religion. The care of a family cannot extenuate the guilt of neglecting private devotion or public duties; it cannot exculpate a neglect of the word or the ordinances of God; and to be "cumbered about much serving," is not only waste of time, but unfits the mind for profitable intercourse, and is likely to produce an unhappy effect upon the disposition.
But while we admire this voluntary sacrifice of spiritual advantages, advantages that she generally appreciated, let’s ask ourselves whether we’ve ever deserved a similar criticism, whether we have allowed our worldly concerns to lead us to a similar and blameworthy neglect of our religious duties? Fortunately, like Martha, we love the Savior, we acknowledge our loyalty, we welcome Him through His representatives into our homes; however, at the same time, we forfeit our privileges, miss our opportunities, and let earthly matters replace the ongoing awareness of spiritual truths. Let devout women especially take a lesson from this story. Martha was by no means unique. She represents a large group of women of faith. Here’s a mirror they can look into and see a true reflection of themselves; and we hope they won’t shy away from the helpful revelation of their own flaws, forgetting who they really are. Domestic duties, like any others, can easily turn into an excess. There are many women whose piety inspires widespread admiration, but who, due to a natural tendency or a learned habit, give an excessive, and often very damaging, amount of attention to their household arrangements. We are not justifying uncleanliness or disorder; but it is possible to be overly concerned and overly fussy: by being too particular, we can harm the comfort of others and become burdensome to ourselves; by being too anxious, we can easily interfere with the higher priorities of faith. The responsibilities of a household cannot lessen the shame of neglecting personal prayer or public duties; they cannot excuse ignoring God’s word or ordinances; and being "weighed down by too much serving" not only wastes time but also makes the mind unfit for meaningful engagement and can lead to an unhappy state of mind.
This leads us to notice the second great defect in Martha, which the present occasion tended to illustrate. This was fretfulness of temper. Her language indicates extreme irritation. "Lord, dost thou not care that my sister hath left me to serve alone? Bid her, therefore, that she help me." It might be expected, that, overawed by the dignified and holy presence of the Son of God, this woman would have felt ashamed to show her impatience, and have been contented to remain silent. But nothing could restrain her. Something went wrong. There was some mistake, some confusion, or perhaps some dish out of order. She was bustling about to make preparations upon a scale which no necessity existed to justify, and she wanted the assistance of Mary. But Mary was bettor employed. She "sat at Jesus's feet, and heard his word."
This brings us to recognize the second major flaw in Martha, which this situation highlights. This flaw was her fretfulness. Her words show clear irritation: "Lord, do you not care that my sister has left me to serve on my own? Tell her to help me!" One might expect that, feeling the weight of the dignified and holy presence of the Son of God, she would have been embarrassed to express her impatience and would have chosen to stay quiet. But nothing could hold her back. Something was off. There was some mistake or confusion, or maybe a dish was out of order. She was rushing around to make preparations that weren't really necessary, and she wanted Mary to help. But Mary was better occupied. She "sat at Jesus's feet and listened to his word."
Let pious women beware of that anxiety which generates peevishness. It is a greater fault than any which servants can commit by mere negligence, to allow of those intemperate sallies against their misconduct, which, by degrading their mistresses in their eyes, diminish the good effect a genuine piety might otherwise produce. It is a weakness to be excessively rigid about trifles--to be always contending, morose, and dissatisfied. The particular sphere in which a woman is called to act, seems indeed beset with temptations to this evil; but this consideration should serve to awaken care and circumspection. Religion ought to be exemplified in overcoming the difficulties of our situation, whatever they maybe; and the more numerous they are, the more honourable the resistance. Private life is a sphere of useful exertion. Though retired, it is important. If it be not a field of valour, it is one for patience. If women cannot obtain the laurels of heroism, they may win the better trophies of general esteem and domestic attachment.
Let pious women be careful of that anxiety that leads to irritability. Allowing that unrestrained outburst against their servants' mistakes, which degrades their mistresses in the eyes of others, is a bigger fault than any mere negligence on the servants' part. It's a weakness to be excessively strict about small things—to always be arguing, grumpy, and unsatisfied. The specific role a woman is called to seems indeed filled with temptations to this issue; however, this should prompt vigilance and caution. Religion should be demonstrated by overcoming the challenges we face, no matter what they are; and the more challenges there are, the more honorable the resistance. Private life is a realm of useful effort. Even though it may be quiet, it's significant. If it’s not a battleground for heroism, it’s still a place for patience. While women might not earn the medals of bravery, they can earn the better rewards of general respect and domestic love.
The animadversions we have thought proper to make upon the faults of Martha, ought not however to obscure the view of her excellences. Jesus Christ did not censure her concern, but the excess of it. It was the unnecessary trouble she took, and as a consequence the extreme impatience of temper she manifested, that produced this solemn remonstrance, and led him to contrast her conduct with the silent piety of her sister. We must still admire her generous hospitality, and her warm affection for Christ, although her natural temperment and mistaken views betrayed her into an improper mode of expressing it. She presents a lively contrast to those who manifest no regard to religion or its ministers, and whose errors originate not in mistake, but in cherished hostility and inveterate prejudice. Her Master knew how to appreciate her character: and if he censured her with a seriousness proportionable to her fault, the rebuke was attempered with a kindness expressive of his friendship. The historian distinctly records his personal affection for each member of this happy family. "Now, Jesus loved Martha and her sister, and Lazarus." Let us remember, then, that the real followers of Christ have their defects, defects which perhaps appear the more conspicuous from their association with such opposite excellences: and let us learn, like our divine Master, to esteem even imperfect goodness, while we take every suitable opportunity of affectionately, yet faithfully, correcting its follies.
The criticisms we've chosen to make about Martha's faults shouldn’t overshadow her strengths. Jesus didn’t criticize her concern, but rather the extent of it. It was her unnecessary worries, along with her extreme impatience, that led to this serious admonition, as he contrasted her behavior with her sister’s quiet devotion. We should still admire her generous hospitality and her deep affection for Christ, even if her natural temperament and misunderstandings led her to show it inappropriately. She stands in stark contrast to those who show no regard for religion or its leaders, whose mistakes come not from misunderstanding but from deep-seated hostility and ingrained prejudice. Her Master knew how to value her character: and while he addressed her shortcomings with the seriousness they deserved, his critique was softened by a kindness that reflected his friendship. The writer makes it clear that he personally cared for each member of this joyful family: “Now, Jesus loved Martha and her sister, and Lazarus.” So let’s remember that true followers of Christ have their flaws, which may seem more pronounced due to their association with such contrasting virtues, and let’s learn, like our divine Master, to appreciate even imperfect goodness while taking every appropriate chance to lovingly yet honestly correct its shortcomings.
Reader! pause for a few moments, to reflect upon the important apophthegm pronounced by Christ upon this occasion, and the benediction upon Mary, with which it was accompanied: "One thing is needful!" This was virtually pronouncing religion, which involves a pre-eminent regard to the eternal interests of the soul, to be supremely important--a principle of holiness, a source of peace, and a pledge of immortal joy. It is, besides, of universal concern, and comprehends whatever is essential to the present and future felicity of a rational creature. "We should judge very ill of the nature of this care, if we imagined that it consisted merely in acts of devotion or religious contemplation; it comprehends all the lovely and harmonious band of social and humane virtues. It requires a care, of society, a care of our bodies and of our temporal concerns; but then all is to be regulated, directed, and animated by proper regards to God, Christ, and immortality. Our food and our rest, our trades and our labors, are to be attended to; and all the offices of humanity performed in obedience to the will of God, for the glory of Christ, and in a view to the improving of the mind in a growing meetness for astate of complete perfection. Name any thing which has no reference at all to this, and you name a worthless trifle, however it may be gilded to allure the eye, however it may be sweetened to gratify the taste. Name a thing, which, instead of thus improving the soul, has a tendency to debase and pollute, to enslave and endanger it, and you name what is most unprofitable and mischievous, be the wages of iniquity ever so great; most foul and deformed, be it in the eyes of men ever so honorable, or in their customs ever so fashionable." [37]
Reader! Take a moment to think about the important saying Jesus expressed on this occasion, along with the blessing for Mary: "One thing is needful!" This highlights that religion, which focuses on the eternal well-being of the soul, is of the utmost importance—it is a principle of holiness, a source of peace, and a promise of everlasting joy. Additionally, it pertains to everyone and includes everything essential for both present and future happiness of a rational being. "We would misunderstand the nature of this concern if we thought it was only about acts of devotion or religious contemplation; it also includes the beautiful and harmonious mix of social and humane virtues. It involves caring for society, our bodies, and our worldly matters; however, everything should be guided, directed, and inspired by proper respect for God, Christ, and eternity. We must pay attention to our food and rest, our work and efforts, and perform all acts of humanity in obedience to God's will, for Christ's glory, and with the aim of enhancing our minds to prepare for a state of complete perfection. Mention anything that doesn’t relate to this, and you have named something insignificant, no matter how it may be dressed up to catch the eye or sweetened to please the palate. Name something that, instead of uplifting the soul, tends to degrade and pollute it, to bind it and put it at risk, and you have named what is most unhelpful and harmful, no matter how great the rewards of wrongdoing may seem; most ugly and misshapen, even if it appears honorable in the eyes of people, or fashionable in their customs." [37]
How important is it, that we should make a similar choice with that of Mary! This is obvious from the words of Christ, who represents it as "that good part which shall not be taken away from her." Genuine piety is calculated to prevent innumerable evils and sources of misery, by preventing those indulgences which pollute while they gratify, poisoning the constitution, impairing the reputation, and displeasing God: and by elevating the affections to the purity of heaven. It augments incalculably the pleasure which is derived from the possession of all other good of a subordinate nature. While it possesses the power of extracting the distasteful ingredients that imbitter the cup of adversity, it sweetens the sweetest portion of prosperous life; and such is its prevailing efficacy, that no changes can possibly deprive us of its consolations. It shall "not be taken away." How strange, then, is the infatuation of such as make a different choice, and how unfounded their seasons for such a guilty preference! However their conduct may be artfully varnished over with fair pretences, they betray consummate folly. The very foundation of all their hopes will fail, the specious appearances of the world will prove deceptive, like the rainbow that stretches its radiant curve over half the heavens, but vanishes as you approach it into mist and nothingness, and their condemnation will be no less remarkable than their ultimate disappointment. O that, with Mary, we may sit at the feet of Jesus, and by a prompt obedience to his comments "find rest to our souls."
How important is it that we make a choice similar to Mary’s! This is clear from Christ’s words, who describes it as "that good part which shall not be taken away from her." True piety helps prevent countless evils and sources of misery by stopping indulgences that, while satisfying, pollute us, harm our reputation, and displease God. It also elevates our hearts to a heavenly purity. It greatly increases the joy we get from all other good things. While it can remove the unpleasant aspects that sour life's hardships, it also sweetens the most joyful moments of a prosperous life; and its power is such that no changes can take away its comfort. It shall "not be taken away." How strange, then, is the foolishness of those who make a different choice, and how unfounded their reasons for such a guilty preference! No matter how cleverly they disguise their choices with good excuses, they display total foolishness. The very foundation of all their hopes will collapse; the appealing appearances of the world will prove to be deceptive, like a rainbow that arches beautifully across the sky but disappears into mist and nothingness as you approach it, and their downfall will be as notable as their eventual disappointment. Oh, that we, like Mary, may sit at the feet of Jesus and, through immediate obedience to his words, "find rest for our souls."
Scarcely have we read of the privileges of the two sisters at Bethany, when we are introduced to an account of their trials: so closely do pleasures and pains follow each other in the train of human events! The fairest fruit is often beset with thorns, the clearest day liable to be overcast with clouds; and should the morning of life rise in brightness, and the evening set in serenity, who can reasonably hope that no changes shall occur in its intermediate hours? Religion indeed promises consolation amidst afflictions, but not exemption from them: she is the guardian of our spiritual interests, but not the disposer of our terrestrial condition. How happily was the previous intercourse of Martha and Mary with Jesus calculated to prepare them for their more gloomy visiter, DEATH!
Scarcely have we read about the blessings of the two sisters at Bethany when we’re introduced to their challenges: pleasure and pain follow each other so closely in human life! The sweetest fruit often has thorns, and the brightest day can be overshadowed by clouds; and if the morning of life shines brightly, and the evening is calm, who can reasonably expect that nothing will change in between? Religion does promise comfort during hardships, but not a way to avoid them: it watches over our spiritual well-being, but it doesn't control our earthly situation. How well their earlier interactions with Jesus prepared Martha and Mary for the arrival of the much darker visitor, DEATH!
Lazarus, the brother of these excellent women, was taken ill, upon which they immediately sent to inform their divine Friend of the distressing circumstance. As soon as he heard it, he remarked to his disciples that this event would prove the occasion of enhancing his own and his Father's glory; but notwithstanding the ardent friendship which he cherished for the family, and which the evangelist particularly notices, [38] he did not hasten, as it seemed natural he should, to Bethany, but remained where he was two days longer. It was his intention, doubtless, to prove the faith of his disciples, to try the spirit of the two sisters, and to furnish an opportunity of working the miracle with which he afterward astonished the Jews. After this mysterious delay, he announced his purpose of proceeding into Judea: upon which his disciples remonstrated with him, representing the persecuting spirit of the people, which of late had been displayed in attempts upon his life. To this he answered there were twelve hours in the day, and consequently it was requisite to use despatch in the performance of the labour assigned to him who would not stumble in the night, or leave his work unfinished; and then intimating the departure of their friend Lazarus, he said, "I go that I may awake him out of sleep." Mistaking his meaning, and imagining that he had been speaking only of "taking rest," in natural sleep, the disciples replied, that if this were the case, it was probable he would soon recover, and therefore it was unnecessary to go to Bethany. Jesus then said plainly, "Lazarus is dead." Seeing the intrepidity of their Master, the disciples, stimulated by Thomas, resolved to accompany him into Judea, and encounter every danger to which their attachment might expose them.
Lazarus, the brother of these amazing women, got sick, so they immediately sent word to their divine Friend about the troubling situation. When he heard this, he told his disciples that this event would lead to greater glory for both him and his Father. However, despite his deep friendship for the family, which the writer highlights, [38] he didn't rush to Bethany as one might expect; he stayed where he was for two more days. His intention was likely to test his disciples' faith, examine the feelings of the two sisters, and create an opportunity for the miracle that would later astonish the Jews. After this mysterious delay, he announced his plan to go to Judea. His disciples tried to dissuade him, pointing out the hostility of the people, who had recently tried to harm him. He replied that there are twelve hours in the day, so it’s important to act quickly and not stumble in the dark or leave the work unfinished. Then, mentioning that their friend Lazarus had "fallen asleep," he said, "I go that I may awaken him from sleep." Misunderstanding him and thinking he meant regular sleep, the disciples said that if that were the case, Lazarus would likely recover soon, so there was no need to go to Bethany. Jesus then stated clearly, "Lazarus is dead." Seeing their Master’s courage, the disciples, encouraged by Thomas, decided to go with him to Judea and face any danger their loyalty might bring.
When Jesus had arrived in the vicinity of Bethany, he found that his beloved friend had been interred four days; and as this village was not more than two miles from Jerusalem, many of the inhabitants who were acquainted with the family, were come to condole with them upon their loss. Martha hastened to meet Jesus, as soon as she heard of his approach; but Mary, who perhaps was not yet informed of it, continued sitting upon the ground, in the usual posture of mourners.
When Jesus got near Bethany, he learned that his dear friend had been buried for four days. Since this village was only about two miles from Jerusalem, many local residents who knew the family came to comfort them during their loss. Martha rushed out to meet Jesus as soon as she heard he was coming, but Mary, who might not have known yet, stayed sitting on the ground, like mourners typically do.
Having expressed her surprise at his delay, Martha intimated to Jesus that she well knew that God would now grant every thing he might see fit to request, and if he had been present before, the death of her brother might have been prevented. Compassionating her distress, he replied, "Thy brother shall rise again;" to which she answered, that she had the fullest conviction of this fact, as she believed the doctrine of the final resurrection. Her heart, however, was still overwhelmed with grief at her present calamitous bereavement; and it was not without extreme reluctance, that she admitted the idea of never seeing him more till that distant period. Jesus then gave her the assurance of his being "the resurrection and the life," and of the mighty power which he as the agent in accomplishing this work, would display in elevating all his people to the felicities of another and a better existence; in consequence of which death ought not to be regarded with terror, but merely as the season of repose previous to the morning of eternity, which would soon break with ineffable splendour upon the tomb. Martha declared her full persuasion of this sublime truth, founded upon her knowledge of him who addressed her as the true Messiah, the Son of God, to whom all power in heaven and earth was intrusted.
Having expressed her surprise at his delay, Martha hinted to Jesus that she understood God would grant whatever he asked, and if he had been there earlier, her brother's death could have been avoided. Feeling her pain, he replied, "Your brother will rise again," to which she responded that she was fully convinced of this, as she believed in the final resurrection. However, her heart was still heavy with grief over her current loss; she reluctantly accepted the thought of never seeing him again until that distant time. Jesus then assured her that he was "the resurrection and the life," and that the incredible power he would show in raising all his followers to a better existence meant that death should not be feared, but seen as a period of rest before the dawn of eternity, which would soon shine with unimaginable glory upon the grave. Martha declared her complete belief in this wonderful truth, based on her understanding of him who spoke to her as the true Messiah, the Son of God, to whom all authority in heaven and earth was given.
Upon this, she went by desire of Jesus to call her sister. As she had communicated the information to Mary in a whisper, her friends who were present supposed, when she rose up hastily, that she was going to visit the sepulchre of Lazarus, there to renew her griefs and bewail her bereavement. As soon as she found Jesus, she prostrated herself at his feet, and expressed herself in terms similar to those of Martha, indicative of a conviction that the death of her beloved relative might have been prevented, if he had but hastened to Bethany upon the news of his dangerous illness. This afflicting scene excited the deepest concern in him, who, though he had every passion under the most perfect control, now chose to indulge and to manifest his tenderness for Lazarus. He inquired where they had laid him, and, as they conducted him to the spot, he wept. Remembrance of the dead, sympathy for the living, and pity for the impenitent Jews, drew forth his tears, which, while they sanction the grief of his people at the loss of earthly connections, do not justify its excess.
Upon this, she went to call her sister because Jesus asked her to. Since she had quietly shared the information with Mary, her friends present assumed that when she got up quickly, she was going to the tomb of Lazarus to renew her mourning. As soon as she found Jesus, she fell at his feet and expressed herself similarly to Martha, believing that her loved one’s death could have been avoided if he had come to Bethany sooner when he first heard about his serious illness. This heartbreaking scene stirred deep concern in him, who, despite perfectly controlling his emotions, chose to show his compassion for Lazarus. He asked where they had laid him, and as they led him to the place, he wept. Memories of the deceased, sympathy for the living, and pity for the unrepentant Jews brought forth his tears, which, while they acknowledge the grief of his people over their earthly losses, do not excuse its excess.
The spectators, in general, were affected with this testimony of friendship: but some of them inquired among themselves, whether he who had opened the eyes of the blind, could not have prevented the calamity which he appeared so deeply to deplore. This was a very natural question; and he was about to convince them that he could, by performing a miracle far more splendid and important than such an interposition. The sepulchre of Lazarus was a cave, with a large stone upon its mouth. Jesus commanded them to remove this stone, not choosing to do it miraculously, in order to avoid unnecessary parade. Martha, who seems to have been agitated by a great conflict of feelings, very improperly exclaimed against this proceeding; and alleged, that as he had been interred four days, the corpse must have become offensive. Jesus with his characteristic gentleness, reminded her that he knew well what he had ordered: and that his previous assurance, that if she would only believe she should see the glory of God, ought to have sealed her lips in silence.
The spectators were generally touched by this expression of friendship, but some of them wondered among themselves if the one who had opened the eyes of the blind could not have prevented the tragedy he seemed to mourn so deeply. This was a very reasonable question, and he was about to show them that he could by performing a miracle that was far more impressive and meaningful than such an intervention. The tomb of Lazarus was a cave with a large stone at its entrance. Jesus instructed them to roll away the stone, not wanting to do it miraculously to avoid unnecessary show. Martha, who appeared to be struggling with strong emotions, inappropriately protested this action and argued that since he had been buried for four days, the body must be starting to smell. Jesus, with his typical kindness, reminded her that he was fully aware of what he had commanded and that his earlier assurance that if she believed, she would see the glory of God should have kept her quiet.
The stone being removed according to the request of Jesus, he uttered a short but expressive prayer to Heaven; and then with a loud voice, cried out, "Lazarus, come forth." The realms of death heard his sovereign mandate, and their gloomy monarch yielded up his captive; "and he that was dead came forth, bound hand and foot, with grave clothes: and his face was bound about with a napkin. Jesus saith unto them, Loose him, and let him go." The effect of this miracle was considerable; for many of the Jews, who had come to sympathize with the bereaved sister, believed in Christ, though others instantly repaired to the Pharisees, to inflame their malignity by reciting what they had witnessed. With similar diversity of effect, is the Gospel now proclaimed to men; its facts and evidences kindling the resentment of some, or hardening them into increased obduracy; while they convince the minds of others, interesting their best affections, conquering their prejudices, and operating their salvation.
The stone was removed at Jesus' request, and he said a short but powerful prayer to Heaven; then, in a loud voice, called out, "Lazarus, come out." The realms of death responded to his commanding call, and their dark ruler gave up his captive; "and the man who had been dead came out, bound hand and foot with grave clothes, and his face wrapped in a napkin. Jesus said to them, 'Unbind him and let him go.'" The impact of this miracle was significant; many Jews who had come to comfort the grieving sister believed in Christ, while others immediately went to the Pharisees to stir up their anger by sharing what they had seen. Similar to how the Gospel is presented today, its truths and evidence provoke strong reactions in some, making them more resentful or hardened, while convincing others, touching their deepest feelings, overcoming their biases, and leading to their salvation.
If there were any exception to that universal law which consigns man to the grave, it might be hoped that such as compose the church of God, being redeemed by the blood of his Son, called according to his purpose, and sealed by his Spirit to the day of redemption, would be freed from this calamity; but death extends his dreadful dominion over the families of the righteous, as well as the impious. The people of God might, if he pleased, have been delivered from the present curse: his goodness might have indemnified them from the common evils which afflict human life, and appointed them some favoured region, the Goshen of the universe, where they should have passed their days in a state of rich possession and unmolested tranquillity; but, if he have ordained otherwise, it is for wise reasons; some of which, perhaps, we may succeed in explaining.
If there were any exception to the universal law that leads everyone to the grave, it would be reasonable to hope that those who make up the church of God—redeemed by the blood of His Son, called according to His purpose, and sealed by His Spirit until the day of redemption—would be spared from this tragedy. However, death extends its terrifying reach over both the righteous and the wicked. God could have chosen to protect His people from this current curse; His goodness could have shielded them from the common woes of human life and placed them in a blessed area, like the Goshen of the universe, where they could live in abundance and peace. But if He has chosen differently, it is for wise reasons, some of which we may be able to understand.
Is not such a dispensation, for instance, calculated to impress an awful sense of the malignity of sin? So abominable is it, that the blessed God, who has made an ample provision for the future, felicity of his saints, and who is daily imparting to them on earth the invaluable blessings of his grace, cannot, it seems, consistently with his perfection, exempt them from the stroke of death. It is requisite that his detestation of it should be evinced in a complete and undistinguishing overthrow of the race of mortals, amongst whom even those whose names are written in the book of life, on account of their nature being contaminated with depravity must suffer the punishment of temporal death, and show to admiring immortals, that God is "of purer eyes than to behold iniquity, and cannot look upon sin."
Isn't such a situation meant to deeply emphasize the seriousness of sin? It’s so dreadful that the blessed God, who has made ample provisions for the future happiness of His saints and who is consistently giving them invaluable blessings of grace here on earth, cannot, it seems, in keeping with His perfection, spare them from death. It’s necessary that His hatred of sin be shown through the complete and indiscriminate downfall of humanity, among whom even those whose names are written in the book of life must, due to their nature being tainted by sin, face the punishment of death. This illustrates to the eternal beings that God is "of purer eyes than to behold iniquity, and cannot look upon sin."
Besides, this demolition of the corporeal frame is an essential means of its purification. The leprosy has infected every part of the building, the members of the body have become instrumental to the working of unrighteousness; and, consequently, "the earthly house of this tabernacle must be dissolved."
Besides, breaking down the physical body is a crucial way to purify it. The leprosy has tainted every part of the structure, and the body's members have become tools for wrongdoing; therefore, "the earthly house of this tabernacle must be dissolved."
The infliction of this calamity upon believers in Christ as well as upon others, is calculated also to maintain their faith in vigorous and perpetual exercise. Were it permitted to them to pass into another world, as Enoch or Elijah did, by a sudden transportation beyond the regions of mortality to those of undecaying existence, without undergoing "the pains, the groans, the dying strife," or without experiencing the frightful alteration that occurs in other human beings, there would no longer exist the same opportunity as at present for the display of one of the noblest principles of a renewed mind. Who can contemplate the debased condition of the body, who can realize the amazing change which "flesh and blood is heir to"--the icy coldness, the stony insensibility, the universal inanimation that pervades the whole frame, the putrefaction to which it is subject, and the general loathsomeness of that which once appeared the fairest structure amongst the works of God, without an instinctive shuddering, and without perceiving that faith alone can give the victory over death? There is nothing surely in the state of the body after this event to indicate a future existence, but rather every thing to perplex such a sentiment, and to confound such an expectation. There is nothing in its aspect which seems to foretel life--nothing to predict resuscitation. In general, however desperate the case, hope is sustained by the most trifling circumstances, the feeblest glimmerings of the yet unextinguished lamp; if there be the gentlest breath, or the slightest motion, the solicitude of wakeful tenderness is still maintained, and the possibility at least of a return to health is admitted as a welcome and not irrational idea; but when the breath entirely fails, when motion is paralyzed, when the lamp is extinct, whence can any thought of a revival be obtained? What succeeds the fatal moment, but progressive decay? And who can discover the least trace of an indication that the departed friend will resume his life? Every hour seems to widen the breach, to increase the distance that separates the dead from the living, and to complete the triumph of our mortal foe. All the powers of nature in combination would prove incompetent to produce life in the smallest particle--the most insignificant atom of dust; and hope naturally expires when animation ceases. When Christians, therefore, are required to part with their companions, or to die themselves, their only confidence must be in God; and whoever cannot receive his word, and rely upon the assurances which he has given with regard to the exercise of divine power in the recovery of man from the grave, has no adequate consolation amidst the desolations that await him.
The impact of this tragedy on believers in Christ and others is also meant to keep their faith actively engaged. If they were allowed to transition to another world like Enoch or Elijah—being suddenly transported out of mortality to a state of eternal existence, without experiencing "the pains, the groans, the dying struggle," or without facing the terrifying transformation that affects other humans, there wouldn’t be the same chance as there is now to showcase one of the greatest principles of a renewed mind. Who can witness the degraded state of the body, who can grasp the incredible change that "flesh and blood inherit"—the icy coldness, the stone-like numbness, the complete stillness that fills the entire form, the decay it faces, and the overall repulsiveness of what was once the most beautiful creation among God’s works—without feeling a natural shudder and recognizing that only faith can conquer death? There is nothing in the state of the body after this event that suggests a future existence, but rather everything that complicates such a belief and challenges such hope. Its appearance offers no indication of life—nothing to foresee revival. Generally, however dire the situation, hope is sustained by the slightest signs, the faintest flickers of a still-alive ember; if there’s the tiniest breath or the smallest movement, the tenderness of watchful care continues, and the idea of the possibility of recovery remains a welcome and reasonable thought; but when breath fully stops, when movement is frozen, when the flame goes out, how can any thought of revival emerge? What follows that deadly moment but gradual decline? And who can find even the slightest hint that their departed friend will return to life? Each hour seems to widen the gap, to increase the distance between the dead and the living, ultimately handing victory to our mortal enemy. All of nature’s powers combined would be incapable of sparking life in the tiniest speck of dust; and hope naturally fades when life ceases. Therefore, when Christians are asked to part from loved ones or face their own deaths, their only assurance must be in God; and whoever cannot accept his word, and trust in the promises He has made regarding divine power in restoring man from the grave, has no true comfort in the desolation that lies ahead.
Christians also must pass through the change of death, because the glory of Jesus Christ in the resurrection could not otherwise be so illustriously displayed. Never did the character of the Son of God appear with more commanding majesty than when he recalled the spirit of Lazarus from the invisible state, and at a word raised his body from the sepulchre. "Lazarus," said he, "come forth:" the summons entered the ear of death, and the "last enemy" felt himself "destroyed."
Christians also must go through death because the glory of Jesus Christ in the resurrection couldn't be showcased so powerfully otherwise. The character of the Son of God never appeared more majestically than when he brought Lazarus's spirit back from the unseen and, with just a word, raised his body from the tomb. "Lazarus," he said, "come out:" the call reached the ears of death, and the "last enemy" knew he was "defeated."
The scene is infinitely cheering. Though we "fade as a leaf," dropping one by one into the tomb like the foliage of autumn; the eternal spring advances, when "they that are in the grave shall hear his voice, and shall come forth"--renewed in vigour, purified in character, perfected in felicity--to return no more to this sublunary sphere, to descend no more to the dust, to struggle no more with sin and sorrow, to be assaulted no more with the "fiery darts of the devil."
The scene is incredibly uplifting. Even though we "fade like leaves," falling one by one into the grave like autumn foliage; eternal spring approaches, when "those who are in the grave will hear his voice and come out"—renewed in strength, cleansed in spirit, perfected in happiness—never to return to this earthly realm, never to fall back to the dust, never to struggle again with sin and sorrow, never to be attacked again by the "fiery darts of the devil."
Death is so truly alarming to human nature and to shortsighted reason, so calculated by its external appearances to fill the mind with anxiety, that in order to suppress our fears and cherish our hopes, it seemed requisite to bring another existence into the nearest possible view, to render it in a sense visible, and to embody immortality. In the resurrection of Lazarus, as well as by other miraculous manifestations, this great purpose was effected. We perceive incontestably that death is not annihilation, and that the appearance which it assumes of an extinction of being is not a reality. That power which was exerted in one case, reason says may, and revelation declares shall, be exerted in another; and that, by the voice of Omnipotence, all the saints shall be raised at the last day from the abodes of darkness and silence. It is here Christianity takes her firmest stand--here she discloses her brightest scenes! Glorious expectation of rising to eternal life, and through Jesus, "the first begotten of the dead," becoming superior to our most formidable enemy! What a train of happy beings will then be witnesses of his glory, trophies of his power, and inhabitants of his kingdom! This will be the jubilee of all ages, the anticipation of which is well calculated to suppress our anxieties, and quicken us to every duty.
Death is incredibly unsettling to human nature and to short-sighted reasoning, so much so that its external appearances can fill our minds with anxiety. To cope with our fears and nurture our hopes, it seems necessary to bring another existence into clearer view, to make it somewhat visible, and to embody the idea of immortality. This purpose was achieved through the resurrection of Lazarus and other miraculous events. We can clearly see that death is not the end, and that the idea it represents—a complete loss of being—is not real. The power shown in one case, reason suggests, may be applied in another, and revelation promises that it will be. Through the voice of Omnipotence, all the saints will be raised on the last day from their places of darkness and silence. This is where Christianity firmly establishes itself—here it reveals its most radiant visions! The glorious hope of rising to eternal life, and through Jesus, "the firstborn from the dead," overcoming our greatest enemy! What a multitude of joyful beings will then bear witness to his glory, be trophies of his power, and dwell in his kingdom! This will be the celebration of all time, the anticipation of which is designed to ease our worries and motivate us towards our responsibilities.
What mutual congratulations must have circulated through the family of Lazarus, when he was restored to the affectionate embraces of his sisters! What a renewal of love would take place on that happy day! How was their sorrow turned into joy, and their lamentations info praises! What a triumph of mind did they feel over the grave, and what expressions of gratitude to their Deliverer burst from every heart! But who can imagine the transports of that moment, when the same power that raised Lazarus from the tomb, shall be exerted upon every believer in Jesus, who shall "meet the Lord in the air," and be introduced to the eternal society of kindred minds; when the redeemed world shall assemble on the celestial shore, to recount their past labours and mercies, to renew their spiritual fellowship, to hail each other's escape from the conflicts, the temptations, and the diversified evils of mortal life, to behold the glory of Him who has washed them in his blood and saved them by his grace, to take possession of their destined thrones, and to mingle their strains of acknowledgment with the holy by innings of the blest!
What joyful congratulations must have spread through Lazarus' family when he was reunited with his loving sisters! What a revival of love happened on that happy day! Their sorrow turned into joy, and their mourning became praise! They felt a triumphant victory over death, and their gratitude to their Deliverer overflowed from every heart! But who can imagine the joy of that moment when the same power that raised Lazarus from the tomb will be unleashed upon every believer in Jesus, who will "meet the Lord in the air," and be welcomed into the eternal company of like-minded souls; when the redeemed will gather on the heavenly shore to share their past struggles and blessings, renew their spiritual connections, celebrate each other's freedom from the challenges, temptations, and various evils of earthly life, behold the glory of Him who has redeemed them with His blood and saved them by His grace, take possession of their promised thrones, and blend their voices of gratitude with the holy chorus of the blessed!
How terrible then is death, but how delightful! Death is the end of life; death is the beginning of existence! Death closes our prospects, and death opens them! Death debases our nature--death purifies and exalts it! "Let me die the death of the righteous, and let my last end be like his!"
How awful death is, but how beautiful! Death is the end of life; death is the start of existence! Death shuts down our opportunities, and death opens them! Death lowers our nature—death cleanses and elevates it! "Let me die the death of the righteous, and let my last moments be like his!"
Curiosity, ever disposed to pry into what the wisdom of God has not thought proper to reveal, has frequently inquired into the history of Lazarus after his resurrection. It has been asked, what were his feelings, what the nature of his recollections, and what the topics of his conversation? Did he communicate to his sisters any important intelligence from the invisible state, or was he withheld by any divine interdiction from explaining the secrets of his prison-house? Was it not to be expected that some record of those transactions in which he afterward engaged, or of the manner in which he was at last removed from the world, should have been given in Scripture, or of the impressions of his mind respecting the amazing changes which he had experienced?
Curiosity, always eager to dig into what God hasn’t revealed, has often wondered about Lazarus’s life after his resurrection. People have asked what he felt, what he remembered, and what he talked about. Did he tell his sisters anything significant from the afterlife, or was he prevented by some divine command from sharing the secrets of his time in the grave? Shouldn’t we expect some record of what he did afterward or how he ultimately left the world, or at least his thoughts on the incredible changes he went through?
The probability is, that Lazarus had no remembrance of the state into which he had passed during the four days of his interment; and that, as it could answer no good purpose to himself or others to perpetuate in this world impressions suited only to the spirit in another condition of existence, the images of those realities were obliterated from his mind, like the visions of a dream that have for ever vanished away. It is sufficient for us, as it was enough for him, to know that the doctrine of the resurrection was exhibited to the Jews, with an evidence which, but for the violence of their prejudices, must have proved to all, as it did to many of them, irresistibly convincing.
The likelihood is that Lazarus had no memory of the state he experienced during the four days he was buried; and since it served no purpose for him or anyone else to hold onto impressions meant only for a different realm of existence, those memories were erased from his mind, like dreams that have completely faded away. It is enough for us, just as it was for him, to understand that the doctrine of resurrection was presented to the Jews with evidence that, except for their strong biases, must have been undeniably convincing to all, as it was to many of them.
Six days before the passover, Lazarus appears again upon the page of Scripture history, at supper with Jesus at Bethany; but our attention is less directed to him than to his sisters and their divine Guest. Martha, as usual, was busied with domestic preparations; and Mary, with her characteristic zeal and affection, "took a pound of ointment of spikenard, very costly, and anointed the feet of Jesus, and wiped his feet with her hair: and the house was filled with the odour of the ointment."
Six days before Passover, Lazarus shows up again in the biblical story, having dinner with Jesus in Bethany; however, our focus shifts more to his sisters and their divine guest. Martha, as usual, was occupied with household tasks, while Mary, with her typical enthusiasm and love, "took a pound of expensive spikenard ointment and anointed Jesus' feet, wiping them with her hair: and the house was filled with the fragrance of the ointment."
The disciples were displeased at what they deemed this waste of the rich balsam, and murmured against her. One of them especially, Judas Iscariot, exclaimed, "Why was not this ointment sold for three hundred pence, and given to the poor?" [39] But this objection, so far from being dictated by any kindness for the needy, arose entirely from his eagerness to increase the store with which he was intrusted, and which he was intending to appropriate to himself. Aware of this design, and disapproving the uncharitable disposition manifested by his disciples, Jesus reproved them; and expressed his satisfaction with Mary's conduct as indicative of a regard for which she should hereafter be celebrated throughout the world. He intimated that he should soon leave them, and that this might be considered as an expression of fondness towards a friend who might be almost viewed as already dead, and to whom she would have few other opportunities of testifying her affection.
The disciples were unhappy about what they saw as a waste of the expensive balsam and complained about her. One of them, Judas Iscariot, said, "Why wasn't this ointment sold for three hundred pence and given to the poor?" [39] But this concern wasn't really about helping the needy; it came from his desire to boost the funds he was managing, which he planned to pocket for himself. Knowing this, and disapproving of the unkind mindset shown by his disciples, Jesus rebuked them and expressed his approval of Mary's actions, highlighting that she would be honored for them throughout history. He hinted that he would be leaving them soon, and that this gesture could be seen as a way of showing love to a friend who might already be considered gone, and to whom she would have few other chances to show her affection.
And shall not we be ready to consecrate our most valued possessions to the service of such a Master? Shall we hesitate to devote to him whatever he claims, or whatever we can bestow? Shall we feel a moment's reluctance to aid his cause by the application of some considerable part of our pecuniary resources to his church and people? He has bequeathed his poor to our care, and it is a solemn charge; neglecting which we shall miss the honor of his final benediction; but fulfilling it, we may indulge the delightful hope that he will recompense even the most trifling attention, and inscribe upon each future crown, in characters visible to the whole intelligent universe, he or "she HATH DONE WHAT SHE COULD."
And shouldn't we be ready to dedicate our most valued possessions to serve such a Master? Should we hesitate to give him whatever he asks for, or whatever we can offer? Should we feel any reluctance to support his cause by contributing a significant portion of our financial resources to his church and community? He has entrusted his poor to our care, and that's a serious responsibility; if we neglect it, we will lose the privilege of his final blessing. But if we fulfill it, we can cherish the hopeful expectation that he will reward even the smallest act of kindness and write on each future crown, in words visible to the entire intelligent universe, he or "she HAS DONE WHAT SHE COULD."
The Poor Widow.
Chapter VIII.
Account of Christ's sitting over against the Treasury--He particularly notices the Conduct of an obscure Individual--She casts in two Mites--it is to be viewed as a religious Offering--the Ground on which it is eulogized by Christ--the Example honorable to the female Sex--People charitable from different Motives--two Reasons which might have been pleaded as an Apology for withholding this Donation, she was poor and a Widow--Her pious Liberality notwithstanding--all have Something to give--the most trifling Sum of Importance--the Habit of bestowing in pious Charity beneficial--Motives to Gratitude deduced from the Wretchedness of others, the Promises of God, and the Cross of Jesus.
Account of Christ sitting across from the Treasury—He specifically notices the actions of an unknown individual—She puts in two small coins—this is seen as a religious offering—Christ praises it for certain reasons—this example is commendable for women—People give for various reasons—Two justifications could have been given to withhold this donation: she was poor and a widow—Her generous spirit despite this—Everyone has something to give—even the smallest amount matters—The habit of giving to charity is beneficial—Reasons for gratitude come from the suffering of others, the promises of God, and the sacrifice of Jesus.
Uncharitableness does not seem to have been characteristic of the Jews at any period of their history, who erred rather on the side of ostentation than of parsimony. During the three great annual festivals, the offerings to the temple were very considerable, and of various kinds; although, in the time of Christ, the country was in a state of comparative depression, as tributary to the Roman empire. Many individuals, however, were no less distinguished for their liberality than their opulence. But it is common to be deceived by appearances; and an action which we may estimate as good, may be of little value in the sight of that Being who "searcheth the reins and hearts," and who will "give to every one according to their works."
Unkindness doesn't seem to have been a trait of the Jews at any point in their history; if anything, they leaned more towards showing off than being stingy. During the three major annual festivals, the contributions to the temple were quite significant and varied; although, in the time of Christ, the country was relatively down, being under the Roman Empire. Many individuals, however, were just as known for their generosity as their wealth. But it's easy to be misled by appearances; an act that we might see as good could have little worth in the eyes of the Being who "searches the reins and hearts" and who will "give to everyone according to their works."
In the history before us our Saviour is represented as sitting "over against the treasury;" for though on every proper, and almost on every possible occasion, he addicted himself to solitude, both for the purpose of exemplifying the propriety of frequent retirement, and of obtaining spiritual refreshment; yet, at other times, he mixed with society to notice and to correct the follies of mankind. His observant eye could not overlook the minutest diversities of human character; and he never permitted a favorable opportunity of deducing from these appearances salutary lessons for his disciples, to pass unimproved. Happy, thrice happy men, to have such an Instructer at hand--to live so near the "Light of the world"--to have constant and intimate access to him, "in whom dwelt all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge!" And happy, thrice happy we, notwithstanding our comparative disadvantages of time and circumstance, who possess the recorded instructions of "the faithful and true Witness," in the page of inspiration, while "darkness covers" so vast a proportion of "the earth, and gross darkness the people!"
In the history we study, our Savior is described as sitting "opposite the treasury." Even though he often sought solitude for reflection and spiritual renewal, he also engaged with society to observe and address people's mistakes. His keen eye noticed even the smallest differences in human behavior, and he never missed a chance to teach important lessons to his followers from these observations. How fortunate were those men to have such a Teacher nearby—to live so close to the "Light of the world"—to have ongoing and personal access to him, "in whom all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge" resided! And how fortunate we are, despite our challenges in time and circumstance, to have the recorded teachings of "the faithful and true Witness" in the pages of inspiration, while "darkness covers" much of "the earth, and gross darkness the people!"
In the situation which Jesus had chosen, he distinctly saw the people casting money into the treasury, and particularly noticed the large sums which many rich persons contributed to this sacred fund. Little did they suspect what an eye was upon them, watching their movements, and estimating their motives! It is probable that the majority of those who came to present their gifts on this occasion, had no personal knowledge of the Saviour, who assumed no extraordinary appearance, excepting that of extreme poverty of condition and deep humiliation of spirit; and that of those who might recognize him, some had been so discomfited by his superior wisdom in the field of argument, as to feel no inclination either to dare another contest, or to submit to his decisions; others were too indolent to make inquiries after heavenly truth, too ignorant to penetrate beyond his humble exterior, or too fearful to incur the censure of ecclesiastical authority, for seeming by a respectful approach to become his disciples; while few, if any, who passed by, were aware that "he knew what was in man."
In the situation Jesus had chosen, he saw people putting money into the treasury and especially noticed the large amounts many wealthy individuals were contributing to this sacred fund. Little did they realize that someone was watching them closely, assessing their actions and motivations! Most of those who came to give their gifts that day probably didn't know the Savior personally, as he didn't stand out in any remarkable way, except for his extreme poverty and deep humility. Among those who might recognize him, some had been so overwhelmed by his wisdom in debate that they felt reluctant to challenge him again or accept his conclusions; others were too lazy to seek out spiritual truth, too ignorant to see beyond his humble appearance, or too afraid of upsetting religious authorities by approaching him respectfully to become his followers. Very few, if any, of those passing by understood that "he knew what was in man."
If there were many among the wealthy contributors to the treasury who gave from motives of vanity and ostentation, it is reasonable to believe that others were characterized by genuine benevolence, and as such approved by their unknown observer. They were not influenced either by a spirit of rivalry or pride, but devoutly wished to be serviceable to religion and acceptable to God. If some came in the temper of the boasting Pharisee, who is represented as professing to pray in these words, "God, I thank thee that I am not as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican: I fast twice in the week, I give tithes of all that I possess"--others, no doubt, as they cast in the liberal offering, felt if they did not exclaim with the publican, "God, be merciful to me a sinner."
If there were many wealthy donors to the treasury who gave out of vanity and show, it's fair to think that others acted out of true kindness, and their unknown observer approved of them. They weren't driven by competition or pride but sincerely wanted to support religion and be pleasing to God. While some might have come with the attitude of the bragging Pharisee, who is depicted praying, "God, I thank you that I am not like other men—thieves, unfair, adulterers, or even like this tax collector: I fast twice a week, and I give a tenth of everything I have"—others, without a doubt, as they made their generous contribution, felt, if they didn't openly say it, like the tax collector, "God, have mercy on me, a sinner."
Although the Son of God has reassumed his glory, being exalted "far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come;" he minutely investigates the characters and actions of men, and will hereafter "appear in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory," for the purpose of "rendering to every man according to his deeds." The proceedings of that day will be marked by the utmost impartiality and justice, founded upon a perpetual and complete inspection of all human actions, and a most perfect knowledge of their motives.
Although the Son of God has taken back His glory, being elevated "far above all authority, power, strength, dominion, and every name that is named, not just in this world, but also in the next;" He closely examines the characters and actions of people, and will in the future "appear in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory," to "render to everyone according to their deeds." The events of that day will be characterized by complete fairness and justice, based on a continuous and thorough review of all human actions and a perfect understanding of their motives.
"Can we think, O Saviour, that thy glory hath diminished aught of thy gracious respects to our beneficence? or that thine acceptance of our charity was confined to the earth? Even now that thou sittest at the right hand of thy Father's glory, thou seest every hand that is stretched out to the relief of thy poor saints here below. And if vanity have power to stir up our liberality, out of a conceit to be seen of men; how shall faith encourage our bounty in knowing that we are seen of thee, and accepted by thee? Alas! what, are we the better for the notice of those perishing and impotent eyes, which can only view the outside of our actions; or for that waste wind of applause, which vanisheth in the lips of the speaker? Thine eye, O Lord, is piercing and retributive. As to see thee is perfect happiness, so to be seen of thee is true contentment and glory.
"Can we believe, O Savior, that your glory has diminished even a little of your gracious consideration for our generosity? Or that your acceptance of our charity is limited to this earth? Even now that you sit at the right hand of your Father's glory, you see every hand reaching out to help your poor saints down here. And if vanity can prompt our generosity just to be seen by others, how much more should faith drive our giving, knowing that we are seen and accepted by you? Alas! What good does it do us to be noticed by those fading and powerless eyes, which can only perceive the surface of our actions, or to receive the empty praise that vanishes from the lips of the speaker? Your gaze, O Lord, is penetrating and just. Just as seeing you brings perfect happiness, being seen by you brings true contentment and glory."
"And dost thou, O God, see what we give thee, and not see what we take away from thee? Are our offerings more noted than our sacrileges? Surely, thy mercy is not more quicksighted than thy justice. In both kinds our actions are viewed, our account is kept; and we are as sure to receive rewards for what we have given, as vengeance for what we have defaulted. With thine eye of knowledge, thou seest all we do; but we do well, thou seest with an eye of approbation!" [40]
"And do you, O God, see what we give you and not notice what we take away from you? Are our offerings more important than our wrongdoings? Surely, your mercy isn't more aware than your justice. In both ways, our actions are observed, our accounts are recorded; and we can be sure to receive rewards for what we have given, just as we will face consequences for what we have failed to do. With your eye of knowledge, you see everything we do; but when we do well, you see it with an eye of approval!" [40]
After stating the general notice which Jesus Christ took of the variety of opulent contributors to the treasury, the sacred narrative informs us of his particularly remarking the offering of a certain individual, whom he exhibited to his disciples as a pattern of unrivalled generosity. The comparative value and magnitude of this gift are recorded; and though the name of this honorable character is concealed, the benevolent deed can never be forgotten.
After mentioning the different wealthy donors to the treasury, the sacred story tells us that Jesus specifically pointed out the offering of a certain person, whom he presented to his disciples as an example of unmatched generosity. The relative worth and significance of this gift are noted, and even though the name of this admirable individual is kept a secret, the kind act will never be forgotten.
We are not informed of the sums given respectively by wealthy persons upon this occasion, but only in general that they were very considerable: "many that were rich cast in much." It is astonishing what large contributions have been sometimes advanced for charitable and other religious purposes: and from knowing that Jesus Christ selected for remark, and distinguished by an extraordinary eulogium, the offering of a certain woman to the treasury, we are eager to inquire who was the donor, and what the gift so celebrated.
We don’t know the exact amounts that wealthy people donated on this occasion, but it is generally understood that they were quite significant: “many rich people threw in a lot.” It’s impressive how much money has sometimes been given for charitable and other religious causes. Since Jesus Christ specifically highlighted and praised the offering of a certain woman to the treasury, we’re keen to find out who she was and what the celebrated gift was.
But we must suspend our prejudices. Let us remember, that "God seeth not as man seeth"--that our calculations of value and of magnitude are often false, because we do not use the balances of the sanctuary, but are governed by the erroneous opinions of mankind--and then we shall be prepared to learn, that on that memorable day, when Jesus sat over against the treasury beholding the numerous and splendid donations of the rich, a female, a widow, "cast in more than they all"--more than any one individually, and more than all collectively!
But we need to put aside our biases. Let’s remember that “God sees things differently than we do”—that our assessments of value and significance are often incorrect because we don't use the true measures of worth, but are influenced by the flawed opinions of society—and then we'll be ready to understand that on that significant day when Jesus sat by the treasury watching the many impressive donations from the wealthy, a woman, a widow, “gave more than all of them”—more than anyone individually, and more than all of them combined!
What then were her resources? Was she some Eastern potentate, who, like the queen of Sheba, "came to Jerusalem with a very great train, with camels that bare spices, and very much gold and precious stones"--a queen who was able to present Solomon with "a hundred and twenty talents of gold, and of spices very great store, and precious stones?" No, she was a poor widow! Our astonishment increases. But some poor persons have great future prospects, or great present connections. Had she then sold an hereditary reversion, or borrowed extensively of some wealthy friends, and impelled by a zeal for God, given it to the treasury? No--she gave only out of her poverty--"she threw in two mites, which make a FARTHING," or about two pence, according to the proportionate value of English money. [41] This was the donation that led Jesus to call his disciples, and address them thus, "Verily, I say unto you, that this poor widow hath cast more in than all they which have cast into the treasury: for all they did cast in of their abundance; but she of her want did cast in all that she had, even all her living."
What were her resources, then? Was she like some Eastern ruler, who, like the queen of Sheba, "came to Jerusalem with a very great entourage, with camels carrying spices, and a lot of gold and precious stones"—a queen who could present Solomon with "a hundred and twenty talents of gold, and a huge amount of spices, and precious stones?" No, she was a poor widow! Our surprise grows. But some poor people have great future prospects or strong current connections. Did she then sell an inherited asset or borrow heavily from wealthy friends, driven by a passion for God, to give to the treasury? No—she gave only out of her poverty—"she threw in two mites, which make a FARTHING," or about two pence, based on the current value of English money. [41] This was the offering that led Jesus to call his disciples and say to them, "Truly, I tell you, this poor widow has put in more than all of them who contributed to the treasury: for they all gave out of their surplus; but she, out of her need, gave everything she had, all she had to live on."
It is proper to remark, that this gift was rather religious than charitable, the offering of piety as distinguished from that of almsgiving. This will be obvious, upon considering that the contributions to the treasury were not for the support of the poor, but for the supply of sacrifices and other necessary services. Dr. Lightfoot states that there were thirteen treasure-chests, called Shopheroth, and collectively Corban or Corbonah, which were placed in that part of the temple denominated the Court of the Women. Two of these chests were for the half shekel, which every Israelite was to pay according to the law; and eleven others were appropriated to the uses specified in their respective inscriptions. 1. For the price of the two turtle-doves, or two young pigeons. 2. For the burnt-offering of birds. 3. For the money offered to buy wood for the altar. 4. For those who gave money to buy frankincense. 5. For those who offered gold for the mercy-seat. 6. For the residue of the money for the sin-offering. 7. For the residue of the money for a trespass-offering. 8. For the residue of an offering of birds. 9. For the surplus of a Nazarite's offering. 10. For the residue of a leper's trespass-offering. 11. For whosoever would offer an offering of the herds.
It’s important to note that this gift was more about faith than charity, an expression of devotion rather than just giving to the needy. This becomes clear when you consider that the donations to the treasury weren't meant to support the poor, but to fund sacrifices and other essential services. Dr. Lightfoot mentions that there were thirteen treasure chests, called Shopheroth, collectively known as Corban or Corbonah, located in an area of the temple known as the Court of the Women. Two of these chests were designated for the half shekel that every Israelite was required to pay according to the law, while the other eleven were designated for specific purposes indicated on their labels: 1. For the price of the two turtle-doves, or two young pigeons. 2. For the burnt-offering of birds. 3. For the money offered to buy wood for the altar. 4. For those who gave money to buy frankincense. 5. For those who offered gold for the mercy-seat. 6. For the remaining money for the sin-offering. 7. For the remaining money for a trespass-offering. 8. For the remaining offering of birds. 9. For the surplus of a Nazarite's offering. 10. For the remaining money for a leper's trespass-offering. 11. For anyone who wanted to offer an offering of the herds.
Our Saviour eulogized the gift of this good woman less, probably, on account of its comparative superiority to the more splendid donations of opulent contributors to the treasury, whose circumstances were so widely different from hers, than because her motives were more pure and pious. The intention to purchase renown or self-approbation, diminishes the excellence of the most costly offering; while the simple desire to honour God and promote his cause, superadds substantial worth to the meanest donation. Jesus Christ perceived the workings of genuine faith and love in this woman's heart, and estimated them at a price above the choicest jewels or the purest gold.
Our Savior praised the gift from this good woman, not so much because it was better than the more extravagant donations from wealthy contributors to the treasury, whose situations were so different from hers, but because her intentions were more pure and sincere. The desire to gain fame or self-approval takes away from the value of even the most expensive gift, while the simple wish to honor God and support His cause adds real value to even the smallest donation. Jesus Christ recognized the genuine faith and love in this woman's heart and valued it more than the finest jewels or the purest gold.
He saw and he approved the holy zeal of her mind, and well knew that the operations of her benevolence were restricted solely by the limitation of her means. These alone presented an impassable barrier to a liberality of spirit which impelled her far beyond the allowance of a timid policy, or a calculating prudence; and we may reasonably conclude, that she knew no regret at the scantiness of her pecuniary resources, and the inferiority, of her condition, save what originated in perceiving her small capacity of usefulness. She who could cast into the treasury the only two mites that she possessed, would have adorned a higher station. Had Providence placed her amongst the princesses of the earth, while she retained such a disposition, what an extensive blessing to society would she have proved! Such, however, in two many instances, is the corrupting influence of large possessions, that it is always questionable, whether in the very great majority of cases an increase of riches would not deteriorate the principle of benevolence; and whether, if placed amidst the splendid scenes of elevated rank, our eyes would not be soon so dazzled, as to incapacitate us either for seeing the wants of the poor, or the necessities of the church of Christ.
He observed and approved of her passionate dedication, fully aware that the impact of her kindness was limited only by her financial means. These limitations created an insurmountable barrier to the generosity that pushed her far beyond the constraints of cautious or calculating behavior. We can reasonably conclude that she felt no regret over her lack of money or her lower status, except for the understanding that it restricted her ability to help others. She, who could give her last two coins to the treasury, would have flourished in a higher position. If Providence had placed her among the world's royalty, while she maintained such a spirit, she would have been a tremendous blessing to society. However, in many cases, the corrupting influence of great wealth makes it questionable whether an increase in riches wouldn’t diminish one’s generosity. It's uncertain whether, amidst the glittering scenes of high status, we wouldn't quickly become so dazzled that we’d lose sight of the needs of the poor or the demands of the church of Christ.
How exquisite and how enviable must have been the feelings of this pious woman, when she cast her last two mites into the treasury! What a noble generosity! what disinterested zeal! She could not delay a moment to inquire respecting the means of her future subsistence, or the comfort of the present day; the impulse was too powerful to be resisted, and was amply recompensed by an instantaneous enhancement of her happiness.
How amazing and how admirable must have been the feelings of this devoted woman when she put her last two coins into the collection box! What a noble generosity! What selfless enthusiasm! She couldn't take a moment to think about how she would get by in the future or how to feel comfortable today; the urge was too strong to resist, and it was quickly rewarded with a sudden boost in her happiness.
This example is highly honorable to the female sex. It is not the language of flattery, but of truth, to say that they are distinguished by acute sensibility, quick sympathy, and persevering patience in doing good. They are naturally compassionate, and have the best opportunities of gratifying a charitable disposition. From constitution they are more susceptible, from habit more considerate, and from character more prompt than the other sex in promoting benevolent purposes. They generally require less urging to useful measures, and the flame of charity often burns with more brightness and perpetuity in their bosoms.
This example is very admirable for women. It's not flattery, but the truth, to say that they are known for their strong feelings, quick empathy, and enduring patience in doing good. They are naturally caring and have great opportunities to express their charitable nature. By nature, they are more sensitive, by habit, more thoughtful, and by character, more proactive than men in supporting good causes. They usually need less motivation to take action and often have a stronger and more lasting passion for helping others.
In the church of Christ, women have ever been pre-eminent in numbers and in character; they have been the first to profess Christ, and the last to dishonour him; they have joined the train of his followers, borne the reproach of his accusers, sustained the cross of self-denial, and aspired to the crown of martyrdom; they are recorded with marked distinction by an apostolic pen, "Women received their dead raised to life again, and others were tortured, not accepting deliverance, that they might obtain a better resurrection;"--in a word, whenever they have been required to suffer for Christ, they have willingly surrendered life with all its joys; and whenever called to maintain his cause by pecuniary supplies, they have been found ready, like the poor widow, to give even to their last two mites.
In the church of Christ, women have always been prominent in numbers and character; they were the first to profess their faith in Christ and the last to dishonor him. They have followed him, faced the criticism of his accusers, embraced self-denial, and aspired to the honor of martyrdom. They are notably mentioned by an apostolic writer: "Women received their dead raised to life again, and others were tortured, not accepting deliverance, that they might obtain a better resurrection;"—in short, whenever they were called to suffer for Christ, they willingly gave up life with all its joys. And whenever they were asked to support his cause financially, they were ready, like the poor widow, to give even their last two mites.
Some persons will not be liberal, unless they can be praised. They are anxious to see their names exciting public attention, and their benefactions proclaimed upon some public list. If you will allow them to be "seen of men," they will reconcile themselves to make some sacrifice for the good of others; and overcome their heartfelt reluctance to give, when they are assured of being repaid in a proportionate measure of fame. And thus, in fact, their charity is nothing but a sordid traffic; they barter for renown, and aim to insure the recompense before they hazard the gift. But we may be assured, that this is of all speculations the meanest, the most detestable, and ultimately the most ruinous. The poor widow had no suspicion of the kind of observance to which she was exposed, and no wish to attract attention. She silently dropped her money into the chest, and departed. The whole world was, in her estimation, ignorant of the deed; and the whole world could not have bestowed upon her so rich a gratification.
Some people won’t be generous unless they can get praise for it. They’re eager for their names to be in the spotlight and their donations to be listed publicly. If you let them be “seen by others,” they’ll be willing to make some sacrifice for the benefit of others and will push past their genuine hesitation to give when they know they’ll get a corresponding amount of fame in return. So, really, their charity becomes a selfish deal; they’re trading for recognition and want to ensure their reward before making the gift. But we can be sure that this is the most pathetic, most despicable, and ultimately the most damaging way to approach charity. The poor widow had no idea she was being watched, nor did she want any attention. She quietly dropped her money into the collection box and left. In her mind, no one knew what she had done, and the whole world couldn’t have given her a more fulfilling sense of satisfaction.
Persons of the class alluded to will sometimes admit of concealment. They adopt many measures to hide their virtue from the eyes of others; they will by no means court public attention, or allow a formal publication of their deeds: but if perchance they are whispered abroad, if any indiscretion betrays them, if though not written, they are stated; they are the last persons on earth to feel any offence, and congratulate themselves on having effectually secured the applauses of mankind.
People in that class sometimes allow themselves to be hidden. They take many steps to keep their good deeds from being seen by others; they definitely do not seek public attention or let their actions be formally known. But if by chance their actions are talked about, if any slip-up reveals them, even if not written down, but stated; they are the last people to take offense and instead feel proud of having effectively earned the praise of others.
"Good actions," as the admirable Achbishop Leighton remarks, "cannot well be hid; and it may sometimes be necessary for example and exciting others, that they know of it; but take heed that vanity creep not in under this. And further than either unavoidable necessity, or some evident further good of thy neighbour carries it, desire to be unknown and unseen in this. When it must be public, let thy intention be secret; take no delight in the eyes of men on thee; yea, rather count it a pain; and still eye God alone, for he eyes thee. And remember it even in public acts of charity, and other such like, he sees in secret; though the action be no secret, the spring, the source of it, is; and he sees by what weights the wheels go, and he still looks upon that, views thy heart, the bidden bent and intention of it, which man cannot see. So then, though in some cases thou must be seen to do, yet in no case do to be seen: that differs much; and where that is, even the other will be as little as it may be."
"Good actions," as the admirable Archbishop Leighton says, "can’t really be hidden; and sometimes it’s necessary for others to know about them to set an example and inspire. But be careful that pride doesn’t sneak in. Unless it’s truly unavoidable or there’s a clear benefit for your neighbor, aim to remain unknown and out of sight in this. When it has to be public, keep your intentions private; don’t take pleasure in being noticed by others; instead, see it as a burden; and focus solely on God, because He is watching you. And remember, even in public acts of charity, He sees in secret; though the act isn’t secret, its motivation is, and He observes the driving force behind your actions. He looks at your heart, the hidden purpose and intention behind what you do, which people can’t see. So, even if you have to be seen doing something, don’t do it just to be seen: there’s a big difference. And where that ego-driven desire is present, even the other will be minimized."
There are other persons who, though they cannot in all cases be censured for penuriousness, have imbibed a very pernicious error. They plead that they have scarcely sufficient for themselves, that they cannot therefore afford to contribute even to a good cause; and that if they were to do any thing, it must necessarily be so little as to be useless. What, say they, could our insignificant donations avail in aid of a fund which requires the most liberal and constant supplies? Could our drop of charity materially increase the tide, or swell the ocean? Would it become us to take from our few necessities, what could not much augment the comforter minister to the wants of others? Or does God require that his cause should be sustained by the poor, and the poorest of the poor, when he can command the purses of the opulent, or turn the stones of the desert into gold.
There are other people who, while they can’t always be blamed for being cheap, have picked up a really harmful belief. They argue that they barely have enough for themselves, so they can’t afford to give even to a good cause; and if they were to do anything, it would be so small that it wouldn’t make a difference. What, they ask, can our tiny donations do to help a fund that needs generous and steady support? Could our little bit of charity really add to the flood or swell the ocean? Should we take from our few necessities something that wouldn’t significantly improve the comfort of others? Or does God expect his cause to be supported by the poor, and by those who are struggling the most, when he can easily call on the wealthy or turn desert stones into gold?
To this reasoning the instructive history we are considering is a direct reply. There were two circumstances in her lot, which not only merited compassion, but would have furnished as strong arguments against her contributing to the treasury as it is perhaps possible to adduce.
To this reasoning, the informative story we're looking at serves as a direct response. There were two situations in her life that not only deserved sympathy but could also provide compelling reasons against her contributing to the treasury, as strongly as can be argued.
She was in the first place POOR--poor in the extreme; for when she cast in "two mites" it was "all her living" Poverty is helpless. It does not possess the means of alleviating its own distresses, much less of assisting others to any considerable extent. "Wealth," says Solomon, "maketh many friends, but the poor is separated from his neighbour"--separated by his neighbour's selfishness, who is too much occupied with his own concerns to cast his eyes beyond the narrow limits of personal interest--separated by his neighbour's insensibility, whose heart is often cold and motionless to pity as the stone which paves his doorway--separated by his neighbor's avarice, who idolizes gold, and grasps it with unyielding tenacity--separated by his neighbour's pride, who looks with contempt upon his unoffending inferior--separated by his neighbour's servility, who flatters greatness even by acquiescing in its unfounded dislike of the poor--ah! "the poor is separated from his neighbour!"
She was in the first place POOR—extremely poor; for when she put in "two mites," it was "all her living." Poverty is helpless. It can't ease its own suffering, let alone help others significantly. "Wealth," says Solomon, "makes many friends, but the poor is separated from his neighbor"—separated by his neighbor's selfishness, who is too wrapped up in his own problems to look beyond his own interests—separated by his neighbor's insensitivity, whose heart is often as cold and unfeeling as the stone that paves his doorway—separated by his neighbor's greed, who worships money and clings to it with a tight grip—separated by his neighbor's pride, who looks down on those less fortunate—separated by his neighbor's servility, who flatters the powerful even by submitting to their unfounded dislike of the poor—ah! "the poor is separated from his neighbor!"
You plead poverty as an excuse for disregarding every claim upon you; but are you as destitute as this obscure yet excellent woman, who had but a farthing, and gave it even without solicitation? Be encouraged by recollecting who observes and who can repay you. Indeed the poor of every class were the particular objects of the Saviour's attention during his residence on earth; and he has rendered the tattered garment of poverty respectable by having worn it himself.
You claim you can’t help others because you’re broke, but are you really as poor as this humble yet remarkable woman who had only a penny and gave it willingly? Remember who sees your actions and who can reward you. In fact, people from all walks of life were the focus of the Savior’s compassion while he was on earth, and he made the worn clothing of poverty respectable by wearing it himself.
There is one consideration, above all others, which seems to appeal most forcibly to the inferior classes of society in behalf especially of the cause of Christ, and to urge some, even the smallest donations, to the treasurer, of the Christian temple, however incapacitated they may be for other benevolent exertions, namely, that poverty appears to be the peculiar object of divine complacency and provision. It is the common condition of the people of God, who "hath chosen the poor of this world, rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom which he hath promised to them that love him." The vale of poverty seems to be the favourite walk of celestial mercy. Here she distributes her charities--here she spreads her table--here she sends her ministers of grace. It was here the Saviour "went about doing good." The discourses he delivered were adapted to the poor--he consulted their capacities, instructed their minds, felt for their circumstances, and relieved their necessities. Whom others despised he honored--whom others forsook he sought--whom others suffered without a sigh to perish, he supplied, and comforted, and saved!
There’s one important point that resonates most strongly with the lower classes of society, especially when it comes to supporting the cause of Christ. This idea encourages some, even if just a little, to donate to the treasurer of the Christian church, regardless of their inability to contribute in other ways. This point is that poverty seems to be particularly favored by divine grace and provision. It’s the common state of the people of God, who "has chosen the poor of this world, rich in faith and inheritors of the kingdom he promised to those who love him." The realm of poverty appears to be the preferred pathway of heavenly mercy. Here, she shares her blessings—here, she lays out her offerings—here, she sends her ministers of grace. It was in this context that the Savior "went about doing good." His teachings were aimed at the poor—he understood their needs, educated their minds, empathized with their situations, and addressed their hardships. Those whom others looked down on, he honored. Those whom others abandoned, he sought out. Those whom others allowed to suffer without concern, he helped, comforted, and saved!
The Gospel itself was expressly addressed to the poor, and is peculiarly suited to their condition; and the messengers of heaven are directed to go out into the highways and hedges to compel men to come in. The promises of Scripture are peculiarly appropriated to the necessities of the poor. They have no money; hence the blessings of the everlasting covenant are described as "wine and milk," and are to be procured "without money and without price." The poor are subject to fatigue through excess of labor; hence it is "the weary and heavy-laden," whom Christ invites to "come to him," promising them "rest." The poor, being deprived of those means of mental cultivation which the rich enjoy, are usually ignorant; hence the source of the Redeemer's grateful appeal to the Father, "Thou has hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes." The poor are the servants of others; hence we read of "the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free," and "if the Son make you free ye shall be free indeed." The felicities of the invisible state are represented in terms which form a complete contrast to the present condition of the poor. Are they now the tenants of the lowly cottage? "In my Father's house are many mansions"--"we have a building of God, a house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens." Must they now look on all the fields around them, and sigh to think that they belong to another?' Through the grace of the Gospel they anticipate "an inheritance incorruptible, undefiled, and that fadeth not away." Are they now clothed in wretched attire?--they may expect to be adorned with "white robes" and "a crown of glory." Are they now in a state of obscurity--their names unknown--their condition mean and despised?--hereafter they shall have a "name better than of sons and daughters;" they shall "shine as the brightness of the firmament," and "as the stars, for ever and ever." Is their condition on earth eminently "the house of mourning?" Do a scanty meal, a starving family, a pining partner, a wasting disease for which poverty forbids their procuring the most skilful means, frequently excite the bitter, the burning, the unavailing tear? In heaven "the days of our mourning shall be ended," and "God himself shall wipe away all tears from our eyes."
The Gospel was specifically addressed to the poor and is especially relevant to their situation; the messengers of heaven are instructed to go out into the streets and alleyways to bring people in. The promises in Scripture are particularly relevant to the needs of the poor. They have no money; therefore, the blessings of the everlasting covenant are described as "wine and milk," which are to be obtained "without money and without price." The poor experience fatigue from excessive work; that's why it's "the weary and heavy-laden" whom Christ invites to "come to him," promising them "rest." The poor often lack the means of education that the rich have, leading to their usual ignorance; this is the basis of the Redeemer's grateful appeal to the Father, "You have hidden these things from the wise and prudent and have revealed them to babies." The poor are the servants of others; hence we read of "the liberty wherewith Christ has set us free," and "if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed." The joys of the invisible state are described in terms that sharply contrast with the current situation of the poor. Are they now living in a simple cottage? "In my Father's house are many mansions"—"we have a building of God, a house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens." Must they currently look at all the fields around them and sigh, knowing they belong to someone else? Through the grace of the Gospel, they can look forward to "an inheritance incorruptible, undefiled, and that does not fade away." Are they now dressed in shabby clothing?—they can expect to be adorned with "white robes" and "a crown of glory." Are they currently in a state of obscurity—unknown names, their position lowly and disregarded?—they will one day have a "name better than of sons and daughters;" they will "shine like the brightness of the sky," and "as the stars, forever and ever." Is their life on earth primarily "the house of mourning?" Do sparse meals, a starving family, a struggling partner, and an illness that poverty prevents them from treating often lead to bitter, painful, and futile tears? In heaven, "the days of our mourning will be over," and "God himself will wipe away all tears from our eyes."
Had this poor woman been disposed rather to have evaded the gift to the treasury than to have volunteered so large a donation as that of "all her living," the circumstance of her being A WIDOW would seem to have been a sufficient apology. No condition of life can be conceived more wretched. A widow is deprived; "of the object of tenderest regard, the soother of her cares, the defence of her weakness, and the staff of her life." She is left to bewail in solitude--to suffer alone; or, if her children surround her, by tracing in their features the resemblance of her departed husband, she perpetually opens afresh the wound that time was kindly healing, and blends her fond caresses with tears of unavailing regret. She must now support herself--and perhaps struggle to supply them, whose childhood both disqualifies them from affording any assistance, and renders the incessant vigilance of maternal care essential to their very preservation. If, in addition to this, her poverty incapacitates her for resisting the arm of oppression, or vindicating herself against the unmerited reproaches of the censorious and the impious, her situation is inconceivably deplorable. Some part of this description certainly applies, and perhaps all, to the character under consideration. She was a poor widow: and yet the miseries of her own state did not prevent her casting in a liberal supply, even "all her living," into the treasury of God. She trusted for to-morrow to that Providence which had supplied her to-day; a confidence which we cannot doubt experienced its appropriate reward.
Had this poor woman been more inclined to avoid giving to the treasury rather than generously donating "all her living," her status as a WIDOW would have seemed a valid reason. No way of life can be imagined that is more miserable. A widow is left without "the one she cherished the most, the comforter of her troubles, the protector of her vulnerabilities, and the support of her life." She mourns in isolation—suffering alone; or, if her children are with her, she continually opens the wound that time was gently healing by seeing their features resemble those of her late husband, mixing her loving touches with tears of regret. She now has to take care of herself—and perhaps struggle to provide for those whose childhood makes them incapable of helping her and requires her constant attention for their survival. If, on top of this, her poverty leaves her powerless against oppression or unable to defend herself against unjust criticism from the judgmental and the immoral, her situation is unbelievably tragic. Some part of this description certainly applies, and perhaps all, to the character in question. She was a poor widow: and yet her own hardships didn’t stop her from generously contributing "all her living" to the treasury of God. She relied for tomorrow on the Providence that had taken care of her today; a trust that would certainly have been rewarded appropriately.
In addition to these considerations, and as a reply to the sophisms already adverted to, by which so many in far superior circumstances to this good woman endeavour to fence themselves against the charge of illiberality, we remark--
In addition to these considerations, and in response to the arguments already mentioned, which so many people in much better positions than this kind woman use to protect themselves from being accused of narrow-mindedness, we note--
1. It is by no means evident that you have absolutely nothing that can be applied to the purposes of a pious charity. In order to prove this, it would be requisite to show that all your labour is scarcely sufficient to procure your subsistence--a subsistence that does not require or admit the smallest redundancy or the least indulgence. You must prove that you never pamper one appetite or gratify one lust; and that, in compliance with the exhortation of Christ, you "take no thought for the morrow." This is a case of so extreme a nature that its occurrence seems a bare possibility, and will not surely exonerate those who, if they are but scantily supplied in comparison with the ample abundance which enriches the condition of others, have nevertheless the means of a sufficient and perhaps a comfortable support. From those who possess much, much is required; and of those who have little something--to prove that the spirit of benevolence is not extinct, nor the claims of humanity and religion disregarded. You may be unable to pour in gold and silver, but surely you can contribute two miles'. It is an excellent piece of advice, "If thou have but a little, be not afraid to give according to that little; for thou layest up a good treasure for thyself against the day of necessity."
1. It's not at all obvious that you have absolutely nothing that could be used for a charitable cause. To prove this, you'd need to show that all your work barely covers your basic needs—needs that leave no room for extra comfort or indulgence. You would have to demonstrate that you never spoil any desire or satisfy any craving; and that, following Christ’s teaching, you "don't worry about tomorrow." This situation is so extreme that it seems almost unlikely, and it won’t excuse those who, even if they have limited resources compared to those with plenty, still have enough for a decent living, possibly even a comfortable one. Those who have a lot are expected to give a lot; and those who have little should still give something—to show that the spirit of generosity isn't gone, and that we haven't forgotten our obligations to humanity and faith. You might not be able to give money, but you can definitely offer two miles. It's good advice: "If you have only a little, don't be afraid to give from that little; because you are storing up a treasure for yourself for times of need."
2. Whatever may be our estimate of the merit or utility of a small donation, the most trifling addition is of some importance. The seed which is sown in the field of benevolence will bear some fruit and help to swell the harvest. The immeasurable extent of sand upon the sea-shore is made up of grains, and the loftiest mountains are composed of diminutive particles of dust. If the millions who are able to contribute their mites could be induced to do so, the treasury would soon be full; but if they withhold them, the uncertain, capricious, and ostentatious, though large contributions of the opulent, may fail to replenish it.
2. No matter how we view the value or usefulness of a small donation, even the tiniest contribution matters. The seeds planted in the field of kindness will yield some results and help grow the overall impact. The vast amount of sand on the beach is made up of individual grains, and the tallest mountains are formed from tiny particles of dust. If the millions who can give even a little were encouraged to do so, the funds would quickly accumulate; but if they hold back, the unpredictable, flashy, and sometimes excessive contributions from the wealthy might not be enough to fill the gap.
3. The habit of giving, however small the sum, is inconceivably beneficial to the contributor himself. It is an important means of cherishing in the breast that divine principle, which without exercise and use would be likely to languish: for whatever sentiments we feel, whatever theories we adopt, and in whatever eloquence of language and warmth of spirit we expatiate upon the excellences of liberality, unless we give to the necessitous ourselves, the heart will become hardened and cold; and a theoretical religion can never preserve us from a real impiety.
3. The habit of giving, no matter how small the amount, is incredibly beneficial to the giver. It’s an important way to nurture that divine principle within us, which without practice would likely fade away: because no matter what feelings we have, what beliefs we hold, or how passionately we speak about the virtues of generosity, if we don’t give to those in need ourselves, our hearts will become hard and cold; and a theoretical religion will never protect us from a real impiety.
"The peculiar nature of our religion," observes Dr. Barrow, [42] "specially requires it, and the honour thereof exacts it from us; nothing better suits Christianity, nothing more graces it, than liberality; nothing is more inconsistent therewith, or more disparageth it, than being miserable and sordid. A Christian niggard is the veriest nonsense that can be; for what is a Christian? What but a man who adores God alone, who loves God above all things, who reposes all his trust and confidence in God? What is he, but one who undertaketh to imitate the most good and bountiful God; to follow, as the best pattern of his practice, the most benign and charitable JESUS, the Son of God; to obey the laws of God and his Christ, the sum and substance of which is charity; half whose religion doth consist in loving his neighbour as himself! What is he further, but one who hath renounced this world, with all the vain pomps and pleasures of it; who professes himself in disposition and affection of mind to forsake all things for Christ's sake; who pretends little to value, affect, or care for any thing under heaven, having all his main concernments and treasures--his heart, his hopes, and his happiness, in another world? Such is a Christian: and what is a niggard? All things quite contrary. One whose practice manifestly shows him another thing besides and before God; to love mammon above God, and more to confide in it than in him; one who bears small goodwill, kindness, or pity towards his brother; who is little affected or concerned with things future or celestial; whose mind and heart are rivetted to this world; whose hopes and happiness are settled here below; whose soul is deeply immersed and buried in earth; one who, according to constant habit, notoriously breaketh the two great heads of Christian duty, 'loving God with all his heart, and his neighbour as himself. It is, therefore, by comparing those things very plain, that we pretend to reconcile gross contradictions and inconsistences, if we profess ourselves to be Christians and are illiberal. It is indeed the special grace and glory of our religion, that it consisteth not in barren speculations, or empty formalities, or forward professions; not in fancying curiously, or speaking zealously, or looking demurely; but in really producing sensible fruits of goodness, in doing (as St. Paul signifies) things good and profitable, unto men."
"The unique nature of our faith," notes Dr. Barrow, [42] "especially demands it, and the honor of it requires us to embrace it; nothing fits Christianity better, nothing enriches it more, than generosity; nothing is more inconsistent with it, or more diminishes it, than being cheap and greedy. A stingy Christian is the most nonsensical thing there can be; for what is a Christian? Isn’t it someone who worships God alone, who loves God above all else, who places all his trust and confidence in God? Isn’t he someone who strives to imitate the most good and generous God; to follow the most kind and charitable JESUS, the Son of God, as the ultimate example; to obey the laws of God and his Christ, which at their core is all about love; with half his religion based on loving his neighbor as himself? What else is he, but someone who has renounced this world and all its empty glories and pleasures; who claims to be willing in spirit and mind to give up everything for Christ’s sake; who shows little interest or care for anything on this earth, having all his main concerns and treasures—his heart, his hopes, and his happiness—in another world? That’s a Christian: and what is a miser? Everything completely opposite. Someone whose actions clearly indicate that he values something else more than God; who loves money more than God, and trusts it more than Him; someone who shows little goodwill, kindness, or compassion towards his brother; who is hardly concerned with future or heavenly matters; whose mind and heart are fixated on this world; whose hopes and happiness are anchored here; whose soul is deeply buried in earthly things; one who, as a constant habit, notoriously violates the two main commandments of Christian duty, 'loving God with all his heart, and his neighbor as himself. It is, therefore, by clearly comparing these ideas that we attempt to reconcile the glaring contradictions and inconsistencies if we call ourselves Christians while being stingy. It is indeed the special grace and glory of our religion that it does not consist of hollow speculations, empty rituals, or superficial professions; not in overthinking, or speaking with zeal, or looking pious; but in truly producing tangible fruits of goodness, in doing (as St. Paul indicates) things good and beneficial to others."
The story of the poor widow is eminently calculated to inspire gratitude in the hearts of those who are mercifully exempted from the wretchedness of such extreme poverty, which exposes to the temptation of repining at the dispensations of Heaven, and of pursuing improper measures for obtaining relief. Nor is its least evil that of cherishing an envious spirit towards those who are in superior circumstances. From the abodes of penury and want it is indeed a pleasing fact that Divine Grace has chosen its objects, and from lowly vales and humble cottages elevated them to thrones of immortality. We hear apostles saying, "Silver and gold have we none;" and Bartimeus, brought into the train of disciples from "the highway-side," where he was "blind" and "begging." And though it is a delightful consideration, that religion Can alleviate the rigours of want, and infuse sweetness into the bitterest waters of sorrow; yet poverty, with its concomitant evils, is an affliction from which, in its extreme form, we may pray to be relieved. Though in the strictest sense, the Christian, like the apostle, while "having nothing," may yet be said to "possess all things;" yet that degree of necessity which arises from extreme poverty is far from being desirable either for the body or the soul.
The story of the poor widow is clearly meant to inspire gratitude in those who are thankfully spared from the misery of such extreme poverty, which can lead to the temptation of complaining about divine circumstances and seeking inappropriate ways to find relief. One of the lesser evils it creates is fostering envy towards those who are better off. From lives of hardship and need, it’s a comforting thought that Divine Grace chooses its subjects and lifts them from humble valleys and modest homes to thrones of eternal glory. We hear the apostles saying, "We have no silver or gold," and Bartimeus, who was brought into the group of disciples from the roadside where he was "blind" and "begging." Although it's encouraging to know that religion can ease the harshness of need and bring comfort even in the deepest sorrow, poverty, along with its associated struggles, is a burden we may hope to be freed from, especially in its most severe form. While, in the truest sense, a Christian, like the apostle, might declare that while "having nothing," they can still "possess all things," the level of desperation that comes with extreme poverty is far from ideal for either body or soul.
In the most destitute circumstances, however, the promises of our Father in heaven, and the examples which we find upon sacred record, are encouraging. "I have never seen the righteous forsaken, nor his seed begging bread"--"He causeth the grass to grow for the cattle, and herb for the service of man: that he may bring forth food out of the earth; and wine that maketh glad the heart of man, and oil to make his face to shine, and bread which strengtheneth man's heart." Of Zion it is asserted, "I will abundantly bless her provision; I will satisfy her poor with bread:" and "He that walketh righteously, and speaketh uprightly; he that despiseth the gain of oppressions, that shaketh his hands from holding of bribery, that stoppeth his ears from hearing of blood, and shutteth his eyes from seeing evil; he shall dwell on high: his place of defence shall be the munitions of rocks: bread shall be given him; his waters shall be sure."
In the toughest situations, though, the promises of our Father in heaven and the examples we find in sacred writings are uplifting. "I have never seen the righteous abandoned, nor their children begging for food" -- "He causes plants to grow for the animals and crops for our needs, so that we can get food from the ground; and wine that makes people's hearts happy, and oil that makes their faces shine, and bread that strengthens our hearts." Regarding Zion, it is said, "I will greatly bless her resources; I will provide for her needy with bread:" and "The one who acts righteously and speaks honestly; who rejects the profit from oppression, who shakes off bribes, who closes their ears to violence, and shuts their eyes to wrongdoing; they will dwell on high: their place of safety will be like strongholds in the mountains: they will be given bread; their water will be dependable."
Remember the interpositions of God to supply the necessities of the destitute. Go to Egypt and Canaan, and trace the wonderful appointments of that providence which supplied the famished household of Jacob! Go into the wilderness of Sin, and behold an extraordinary kind of dew covering the camp of Israel and sparkling in the morning sun, in fulfilment of the prediction, "I will rain bread from heaven for you!" Observe the famished prophet at "the brook Cherith, that is before Jordan," and see the ravens of heaven descending with bread and flesh to supply Elijah! Follow Jesus into a desert place, where five thousand weary, wayworn strangers, besides women and children, are fed by his liberal hand and his miraculous power! "Behold the fowls of the air; for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they? Which of you by taking thought can add one cubit unto his stature? and why take, ye thought for raiment? Consider the lilies of the field how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin: and yet I say unto you, that even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. Wherefore, if God so clothe the grass of the field, which to-day is, and to-morrow is cast into the oven, shall he not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith? Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or What shall we drink? or Wherewithal shall we he clothed? (For after all these things do the Gentiles seek:) for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things."
Remember how God intervenes to provide for those in need. Look at Egypt and Canaan, and observe the amazing ways in which blessings were given to the hungry family of Jacob! Explore the wilderness of Sin, and see the miraculous dew covering the camp of Israel, shining in the morning sun, fulfilling the promise, "I will rain bread from heaven for you!" Notice the starving prophet by "the brook Cherith, that is before Jordan," and watch as the ravens bring him bread and meat from the sky to sustain Elijah! Follow Jesus into a deserted area, where He feeds five thousand tired and weary men, not counting the women and children, with his generous hand and miraculous power! "Look at the birds in the sky; they don’t plant or harvest or gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not more valuable than they? Which of you can add even a single hour to your life by worrying? And why do you worry about clothing? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they don’t labor or spin, yet I tell you that even Solomon in all his splendor was not dressed like one of these. If God takes care of the grass in the field, which is here today and gone tomorrow, won't He care for you, you of little faith? So don’t worry, saying, ‘What will we eat?’ or ‘What will we drink?’ or ‘What will we wear?’ (For the pagans run after all these things;) for your heavenly Father knows that you need them all."
O, how sweetly does that spirit rest which reclines upon the lap of providence, and feeds contentedly on "daily bread!" The storms may rise and the winds may blow--the clamours of human competition may fill the air; but nothing can disturb his repose. "Thou wilt keep him in perfect peace, whose mind is stayed on thee: because he trusteth in thee." When Solomon was about to ascend his throne, how earnestly did he implore superior wisdom, and how readily leave the disposal of earthly good to his God and Father! And what was the consequence? "God said unto him, Because thou hast asked this thing, and hast not asked for thyself long life; neither hast asked riches for thyself, nor hast asked the life of thine enemies; but hast asked for thyself understanding to discern judgment; behold, I have done according to thy Words: lo, I have given thee a wise and an understanding heart; so that there was none like thee before, neither after thee shall any arise like unto thee. And I have also given thee that which thou hast not asked, both riches and honour: so that there shall not be any among the kings like unto thee all thy days."
Oh, how sweetly that spirit rests who leans on the goodness of providence and happily enjoys "daily bread!" Storms may rise and winds may blow—the noise of human competition may fill the air; but nothing can disturb his peace. "You will keep him in perfect peace, whose mind is focused on you: because he trusts in you." When Solomon was about to take the throne, how earnestly did he seek greater wisdom and how willingly did he leave the management of earthly goods to his God and Father! And what was the result? "God said to him, Because you have asked for this thing, and have not asked for a long life for yourself, nor asked for riches for yourself, nor asked for the life of your enemies, but have asked for understanding to discern judgment; behold, I have done according to your words: I have given you a wise and understanding heart; so that there has been none like you before, nor shall any arise like you after. And I have also given you what you did not ask for, both riches and honor: so that there will not be anyone among the kings like you all your days."
Finally, let us deduce motives for consolation under the pressure of sorrow, and for the limitation of our wishes to the necessary subsistence of life, from "a greater than Solomon." Who was it that stooped to a manger and a cross? Who fasted forty days and forty nights in the desert, refusing to employ his power in furnishing a miraculous table? Who had not "where to lay his head?" Who lived on the scanty fare of a small purse in common with the family of his disciples? Who withdrew from the entertainments of Jerusalem to the humble cottage of Mary and Martha, cheerfully subsisting on the most homely and casual provision?--HE, who has taught us to limit our desires of temporal good within the narrow circle of one short request--"GIVE US THIS DAY OUR DAILY BREAD."
Finally, let’s deduce the reasons for seeking comfort amidst sorrow and why we should limit our desires to what we truly need for survival, from "someone greater than Solomon." Who was it that humbled himself to a manger and a cross? Who fasted for forty days and nights in the desert, choosing not to use his power to create a miraculous feast? Who didn’t have "a place to rest his head?" Who lived on a meager diet, sharing the little he had with his disciples? Who stepped away from the parties in Jerusalem to find solace in the simple home of Mary and Martha, happily making do with whatever food was available? -- HE, who taught us to keep our desires for earthly goods within the tight boundaries of one short request--"GIVE US THIS DAY OUR DAILY BREAD."
Sapphira.
Chapter IX.
Mixed Constitution of the Church of Christ--benevolent Spirit of the primitive Believers at Jerusalem--Anxiety of Ananias and Sapphira to appear as zealous and liberal as others--Ananias repairs to the Apostles to deposit the price of his Possessions--is detected in Deception and dies--similar Deceit and Death of Sapphira--Nature and Progress of Apostasy--peculiar Guilt of Sapphira--Agency of Satan distinctly marked--diabolical influence ascertained--consolatory Sentiments suggested to Christians.
The Mixed Constitution of the Church of Christ—benevolent spirit of the early believers in Jerusalem—Ananias and Sapphira's desire to seem as dedicated and generous as others—Ananias goes to the Apostles to give the money from his property—is caught deceiving and dies—Sapphira's similar deceit and death—nature and progression of apostasy—unique guilt of Sapphira—clear role of Satan noted—identified diabolical influence—comforting thoughts offered to Christians.
"The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field: but while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way. But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also. So the servants of the householder came and said unto him, Sir, didst thou not sow good seed in thy field? from whence then hath it tares? He said unto them, An enemy hath done this.... The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one; the enemy that sowed them is the devil."
"The kingdom of heaven is like a man who planted good seeds in his field. But while people were sleeping, his enemy came and planted weeds among the wheat and then left. When the crops began to grow and produced grain, the weeds appeared as well. The owner's servants came to him and said, 'Sir, didn’t you plant good seeds in your field? Where did the weeds come from?' He answered, 'An enemy has done this.' ... The field is the world; the good seeds are the children of the kingdom; but the weeds are the children of the evil one. The enemy who planted them is the devil."
This parable, so descriptive of the mixed constitution of the church of Christ, from the primitive times down to the present age, is strikingly exemplified in the history of Ananias and Sapphira. These were some of the first tares that appeared in the apostolic field of labour; and we should feel grateful that their names and characters are transmitted to us upon whom the ends of the world are come, for the purpose of salutary warning. Their singular atrocity was but a more full development of the very same evil principles that exist in embryo in the hearts of mankind in general; and their signal and immediate punishment, which was some deviation from the more ordinary methods of Providence, which permits the tares and the wheat to grow together till the harvest or "end of the world," was, under all the circumstances, a necessary expression of divine displeasure.
This parable, which vividly illustrates the mixed nature of the church of Christ from early times to today, is highlighted in the story of Ananias and Sapphira. They were among the first deceitful individuals to emerge in the apostolic mission; we should be thankful that their names and actions are remembered by us, who live at the end of the age, as a valuable warning. Their shocking wrongdoing was simply a more pronounced version of the same negative traits that are inherently present in all people. Their prompt and severe punishment, which deviated from the usual ways God typically acts—allowing both good and bad to coexist until the end of time—was, given the circumstances, an important indication of divine disapproval.
During the first age of Christianity, when it was propagated by apostles and their holy coadjutors, and when Jesus Christ, having so recently departed from the world, had left an unusual glow of ardor and affection in their minds, it seems natural to anticipate not only extensive success in the establishment of Christian churches, but a peculiar purity in the sentiments and conduct of their members. And where shall we find such union, such fervour, such simplicity, such energy, as prevailed in that golden age? Persecution separated them indeed, but could not dissolve their attachment either to the cause or to each other; it could not extinguish their ever-burning zeal. But in vain should we hope for perfection even in the purest societies on earth. If a Judas insinuated himself amongst the apostles during the personal residence of Christ on earth, and under his immediate eye, it is not surprising that an Ananias and a Sapphira intruded into the earliest and best of his churches; nor should it prove unduly discouraging to his ministers or people at any period, when they witness similar instances of deceit and impiety. The more valuable the coin, the greater is the reason to apprehend its being counterfeited; and the more excellent religion appears, and the more highly it is esteemed, the greater will be the probable number of hypocritical professors.
During the early days of Christianity, when apostles and their devoted helpers were spreading the faith, and Jesus Christ had just recently left the world, leaving a strong sense of passion and love in their hearts, it seems natural to expect not only great success in establishing Christian churches but also a unique purity in the thoughts and actions of their members. Where can we find such unity, such fervor, such simplicity, and such energy as in that golden age? Persecution did separate them, but it couldn’t break their bond to the cause or to each other; it couldn’t extinguish their burning passion. However, hoping for perfection in even the purest societies on earth would be in vain. If a Judas managed to slip in among the apostles while Christ was personally with them and under his watchful eye, it’s not surprising that Ananias and Sapphira found their way into the earliest and best of his churches; nor should it be overly discouraging for his ministers or followers at any time when they see similar acts of deceit and wickedness. The more valuable the coin, the greater the chance of it being counterfeited; similarly, the more remarkable religion seems and the more it is valued, the higher the number of hypocritical followers is likely to be.
The history of these two offenders is intimately blended. Their sin and punishment were similar; but there, were some circumstances connected with the transaction which exhibit the guilt of Sapphira in characters of more conspicuous enormity. While reviewing the inspired narrative, let us not cherish the feeling of Hazael, who indignantly demanded of the prophet, "Is thy servant a dog, that he should do this!" but, deeply aware of our inward propensities and our moral dangers, let us unite fervent prayer with sleepless circumspection, "lest we enter into temptation."
The history of these two offenders is closely intertwined. Their wrongdoing and punishment were similar; however, there are some circumstances related to the situation that highlight Sapphira's guilt in more striking terms. As we reflect on the inspired story, let’s not adopt the attitude of Hazael, who angrily asked the prophet, "Am I a dog, that I would do this?" Instead, being fully aware of our inner tendencies and moral risks, let's combine earnest prayer with constant vigilance, "so that we do not fall into temptation."
The church at Jerusalem possessed one peculiarity, resulting from the remarkable exercise of a pure, exalted, disinterested benevolence. Rising superior to every selfish interest, and, in the spirit of unbounded love and liberality, concurring in every measure that was devised to promote the general good; "as many as were possessors of lands or houses, sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold, and laid them down at the apostles' feet; and distribution was made to every man according as he had need." The great proportion of converts were probably indigent, for in no age have "the mighty and the noble" been attracted by the unostentatious simplicity of the religion of Jesus; but some were persons of property. They had lands and houses, with which, however, they willingly parted to supply the necessities of their poorer fellow-Christians. This was a generosity which could not fail of exciting the admiration of the whole society, and of acquiring for them considerable influence. While the apostles approved their disinterestedness, the widows, the orphans, and the indigent of every class, would pour their best benedictions upon their heads, and look up lo them as the ministering angels of Providence. Too often, indeed, the supplies of benevolence are received with a coldness which is truly repulsive, and which bespeaks a secret conviction in the minds of the wretched, that they have a right to expect, and that the opulent are bound to bestow them; but these were Christian poor, and were influenced, we should hope, by a gratitude which such benefactions were calculated to inspire. At the same time, even the unthankfulness of the recipient ought not to shut up our "bowels of compassion."
The church in Jerusalem had one unique trait, stemming from the extraordinary display of pure, noble, and selfless kindness. Rising above all selfish interests and embodying unbounded love and generosity, they supported every effort designed to promote the common good: "as many as were owners of land or houses sold them, brought the proceeds of what was sold, and laid them at the apostles' feet; and distribution was made to everyone according to their needs." Most of the converts were likely poor, since throughout history, "the mighty and the noble" have rarely been drawn to the humble simplicity of Jesus' message; however, some were individuals of means. They owned land and houses, which they willingly sold to help meet the needs of their less fortunate fellow Christians. This act of generosity naturally garnered the admiration of the entire community and gave them significant influence. While the apostles praised their selflessness, the widows, orphans, and needy from all walks of life showered them with heartfelt blessings, viewing them as the caring angels of Providence. Often, the help given is met with a cold reception that can be truly off-putting and indicates a hidden belief among the unfortunate that they are entitled to assistance and that the wealthy are obligated to provide it; but these were Christian poor, and we should hope they were motivated by the gratitude that such gifts inspire. At the same time, even if the recipients are ungrateful, it shouldn't prevent us from showing our "compassion."
Ananias and Sapphira were anxious, amidst such fine specimens of disinterested goodness, not to appear backward. They might be conscious that the respectability of their situation, and the zeal of their profession, excited expectations amongst the other disciples; and though they were certainly under no obligation to practise this profuse charity, they seemed unwilling to lose the opportunity of enhancing their fame: We may justly suspect, that a long struggle was maintained between the love of money and the love of applause. They consulted together;--they were anxious to devise an expedient by which they might gratify their vanity, and yet retain at least the principal part of their property. Ambition and avarice were to be alike gratified, but they were to contrive the concealment of their hypocrisy. With this view, they agreed upon a course of meanness and dissimulation, which involved the most tragical consequences. Ananias seems to have proposed, and Sapphira to have abetted, the transaction. With her consent, which he chose to obtain, and which might have been legally necessary, their estate was sold; and part only of the purchase-money was laid at the apostles' feet, as if it were the whole, and as if Christian charity had dictated this liberal distribution of it.
Ananias and Sapphira were worried, surrounded by examples of genuine kindness, about looking bad. They were likely aware that their respectable status and commitment to their beliefs raised expectations among the other disciples; and even though they weren't required to give generously, they seemed hesitant to miss the chance to boost their reputation. It’s reasonable to think there was a long internal conflict between their desire for money and their desire for recognition. They talked it over; they were eager to come up with a plan that would let them feed their vanity while still keeping most of their wealth. They aimed to satisfy both their ambition and greed but wanted to hide their dishonesty. To achieve this, they agreed on a scheme of deceit that led to tragic results. Ananias appears to have suggested the plan, with Sapphira supporting him. With her approval, which he sought and might have needed for legal reasons, their property was sold; and only a part of the sale proceeds was brought to the apostles, as if it were the entire amount and as if true Christian generosity had inspired this seemingly generous act.
Hypocrites, we perceive, are frequently very much influenced by example and popular applause. How many ostentatious charities may be traced to this polluted source! It is not to do good, to assist the needy, to promote the cause of Jesus Christ; but to escape censure, or to purchase renown, that men often unite in pious contributions. They will slot be outshone by others, or submit to the dishonor of being reputed niggardly and ungenerous. But however such persons abound in visible acts of benevolence, their charity does not resemble the subterraneous rivulet, that revives the drooping flower, and refreshes the languishing herb, wherever it directs its secret and silent course.
Hypocrites, we notice, are often heavily influenced by what others do and by public approval. How many showy acts of charity can we trace back to this tainted motivation! It's not about truly helping those in need or promoting the cause of Jesus Christ; rather, it's about avoiding criticism or seeking fame that leads people to make these charitable donations. They don't want to be outdone by others or be seen as stingy and unkind. But even though these individuals are involved in many visible acts of kindness, their charity is nothing like the hidden stream that nourishes the wilting flower and revitalizes the weary plant wherever it flows silently and secretly.
What a fine opportunity was afforded on this occasion to Sapphira, for fulfilling the high but difficult duties of her situation! How would she have immortalized her name, had she suggested proper advice to her husband, and acted with an upright firmness herself! If, instead of coinciding with his impious plan, she had objected to the proposal, and warned him of the probable consequences of his dissimulation, a strong remonstrance from so dear a relative might have produced the happiest effect upon his mind; and had he still persisted, would at least have vindicated her refusal. Wives are indeed required to "submit to their husbands," but there are cases in which resistance is a virtue of the noblest class. If, transgressing the proper bounds of civil dominion, he attempts to lord it over her conscience, and urges, however authoritatively, her concurrence in iniquity, she must steadfastly oppose temptation. However painful the contest, it is honourable. It will be owned in heaven as a war of duty and necessity.
What a great opportunity this was for Sapphira to fulfill the important but challenging responsibilities of her position! How she could have made her name unforgettable if she had offered the right advice to her husband and acted with integrity herself! If, instead of going along with his wrong plan, she had opposed his idea and warned him about the potential consequences of his deceit, a strong objection from such a close relative could have had a positive impact on his thinking; and even if he had still gone through with it, it would have justified her refusal. Wives are indeed expected to "submit to their husbands," but there are times when standing up is a high virtue. If he exceeds reasonable authority and tries to dictate her conscience, pressuring her to join him in wrongdoing in any way, she must firmly resist temptation. No matter how difficult the struggle, it is honorable. It will be recognized in heaven as a battle of duty and necessity.
In some cases, the woman proves the first instigator to evil, or the prime coadjutor in mischief; but, in others, her sentiments may be sought with advantage. A wise man will seldom engage in an affair of considerable importance without soliciting advice, for "in the multitude of counsellors there 5s safety;" but who so naturally expects, or who so much deserves to be consulted, as the wife of the bosom? Her opinion is likely to be the most disinterested and the most affectionate of any that can be obtained; and if we could obtain a faithful history of domestic life, it would appear that a consultation so natural and proper, has often proved the means of guiding in perplexity and rescuing from error.
In some cases, a woman is the first to start trouble or plays a major role in mischief; however, in other situations, her opinions can be very helpful. A wise person rarely takes on something important without asking for advice, because "in the multitude of counselors, there is safety;" but who is more likely to be consulted or deserves to be consulted more than a partner? Her insights are probably the most unbiased and caring of any advice you can get; and if we could get an honest account of family life, it would show that such a natural and appropriate consultation has often helped to navigate confusion and avoid mistakes.
In the full confidence that their scheme had been concerted with the utmost privacy, Ananias, after the sale of his possessions, hastened to deposit a part of the price in the hands of the apostles. He, no doubt, expected to be welcomed in the warmest terms of commendation. With what astonishment and horror, therefore, must be have heard the terrible appeal of Peter, "Why bath Satan filled thine heart to lie to the Holy Ghost, and to keep back part of the price of the land? Whiles it remained, was it not thine own? and after it was sold, was it not in thine own power? Why hast thou conceived this thing in thine heart? Thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God!" Instantaneous as the lightning of heaven, Almighty vengeance descended upon the unhappy criminal, and withered him in a moment. "Ananias hearing these words, fell down and gave up the ghost; and great fear came on all them that heard these things." He was immediately buried, and about three hours afterward, his wife, totally unacquainted with the melancholy fate of her infatuated husband, and glowing with expectation of sharing the praises which the assembled disciples, as she supposed, were bestowing upon their generosity, presented herself to the apostles. Peter immediately demanded an explicit answer to the question, whether the sum which Ananias had subscribed were the real purchase-money of their estate? To this she deliberately replied in the affirmative. "How is it," said Peter, excited to holy indignation, "how is it that ye have agreed together to tempt the Spirit of the Lord? Behold, the feet of them which have buried thy husband are at the door, and shall carry thee out." Immediately, to the universal astonishment and terror of all the spectators, "she fell down at his feet and yielded up the ghost; and the young men came in and found her dead, and carrying her forth, buried her by her husband."
In full confidence that their plan had been kept completely secret, Ananias, after selling his possessions, quickly went to give part of the money to the apostles. He probably expected to be praised warmly. So, with shock and horror, he must have heard Peter's severe words: "Why has Satan filled your heart to lie to the Holy Spirit and keep back part of the money from the land? While it remained, was it not your own? And after it was sold, was it not under your control? Why have you conceived this thing in your heart? You have not lied to men, but to God!" Just like that, God's punishment struck the unfortunate man, and he collapsed in an instant. "Hearing these words, Ananias fell down and died; and great fear came on all those who heard these things." He was promptly buried, and about three hours later, his wife, completely unaware of her husband's tragic fate and eager to share in the praise that she thought the gathered disciples were giving for their generosity, came to the apostles. Peter immediately asked her directly if the amount that Ananias had promised was indeed the full purchase price of their property. She calmly answered yes. "How is it," Peter said, filled with righteous anger, "how is it that you have agreed together to test the Spirit of the Lord? Look, the feet of those who buried your husband are at the door, and they will carry you out." In a moment, to everyone's shock and fear, "she fell down at his feet and died; and the young men came in and found her dead, and carried her out and buried her beside her husband."
The apostle, by representing the atrocious sin of these offenders as "lying unto God," and "tempting the Spirit of the Lord," intended to intimate that as the ambassadors of heaven, and endowed with miraculous powers and discernment, they who attempted to deceive them, virtually offered an insult to that Holy Spirit that resided in them. They were his representatives and agents, acting by his authority and under his influence. God was present with the apostles in a manner totally different from the mode of his manifestation to any other persons; and in attempting to deceive them, they virtually denied the agency of the Omniscient Spirit, in communicating to them a capacity to discern the inmost motives of the mind.
The apostle, by describing the terrible sin of these offenders as "lying to God" and "tempting the Spirit of the Lord," meant to suggest that, as representatives of heaven with miraculous powers and insight, anyone trying to deceive them was basically insulting the Holy Spirit that was within them. They were his representatives and agents, acting on his authority and under his influence. God was present with the apostles in a way that was completely different from how he appeared to anyone else; and by trying to deceive them, they effectively denied the role of the all-knowing Spirit in giving them the ability to understand the deepest intentions of the mind.
It is not with a view to extenuate the guilt of Ananias or Sapphira, but merely to detect character and illustrate the progress of sin, that we suggest the probability that when they first determined upon the sale of their estate, it might be under the impulse of a momentary benevolence, and that the device of retaining a part of the price was a subsequent consideration. Hypocrites are not profoundly acquainted with their own hearts, or with all the secret operations of a spirit of self-delusion. A sinner does not always, nor perhaps often, imagine the extreme lengths of impiety to which one erroneous step may ultimately conduct him. If he could be brought to see at the period of first indulgence the odious outline, not to say the finished picture, of his future self, he would start with instinctive horror, and blush with unutterable confusion. Secret wickedness is frequently long concealed from all but the eyes of God, by a religious deportment. It remains buried deep in the recesses of the soul till occasion exhibits it, as the needle continues at rest till the magnetic influence approaches. Hence the church of Christ is sometimes astonished and alarmed by the misconduct of a character in whom, perhaps, it had reposed the utmost confidence, or placed the warmest affection; and which, though immediately produced by some sudden temptation, was really the result, the natural, easy, and almost necessary result of a previous course of secret iniquity. The train had been long preparing, but it required some kindling touch to produce the explosion.
It's not to lessen the guilt of Ananias or Sapphira, but simply to examine character and show how sin can develop, that we propose the idea that when they first decided to sell their property, it might have been out of a momentary urge to do good, and that the plan to keep part of the money came later. Hypocrites often don’t really know their own hearts or the hidden workings of their self-deception. A sinner doesn't always, or even often, realize how far one wrong choice can lead him into wickedness. If he could see, at the moment of his first indulgence, the terrible outline—let alone the completed image—of his future self, he would recoil in horror and feel deep shame. Hidden wrongdoing is often hidden from everyone but God due to a seemingly righteous behavior. It stays buried deep in the soul until a situation brings it to light, much like a needle stays still until a magnetic force draws near. As a result, the church of Christ can sometimes be shocked and disturbed by the misbehavior of someone in whom it had placed great trust or affection; and while that behavior may seem to arise from a sudden temptation, it's really the outcome of a long history of hidden wrongdoing. The setup had been in place for a long time, but it just needed a spark to trigger an explosion.
The progress to apostacy is, indeed, usually gradual, though rapid, resembling the irresistible haste of persons travelling down a precipitous path, or the descent of a heavy body towards the earth, whose velocity is accelerated in proportion as it approaches its destination. The first compliance with temptation is accompanied with misgivings--trembling-- restlessness--the very thought of sin is admitted with difficulty, and the determination to practise it, is formed amidst a thousand relentings and prickings of conscience. Still the mind lingers with the object--still the fancy plays about the forbidden fruit, till the hand is stretched forth to gather it--an increased appetite is superinduced, accompanied with a diminished resolution. How many youthful persons, deterred for a time by a religious education and sedate habits, have paused--and paused--and paused on the brink of danger; like Cæsar ere he crossed the Rubicon; their passions and their conscience have held a warm debate--till induced in some fatal hour of illusion to comply, they have progressively advanced to a state of confirmation in guilt, and have made a covenant with hell!
The path to abandoning one’s faith is often slow, yet can feel swift, much like people hurriedly going down a steep hill or a heavy object falling to the ground, gaining speed as it gets closer to the ground. The first time someone gives in to temptation comes with doubts—fear—restlessness—the mere idea of sin is hard to accept, and the choice to act on it is made amid countless second thoughts and feelings of guilt. Yet, the mind stays fixated on the temptation—the imagination hovers around the forbidden fruit, until the hand reaches out to take it—an increased desire builds, while willpower fades. How many young people, initially held back by their religious upbringing and serious behavior, have hesitated—paused—paused again at the edge of danger; like Caesar before he crossed the Rubicon; their desires and conscience are engaged in a heated argument—until, in some moment of delusion, they give in, gradually moving towards a point of no return in their wrongdoing, making a deal with the devil!
The character of Sapphira seems marked with even a deeper stain of guilt than that of her husband. She had more time for reflection, and received a salutary premonition by the question of Peter. Not to advert to the period in which she might probably be left alone during the various transactions of the sale of the estate, three hours elapsed between the infliction of judgment upon Ananias, and her coming to the apostolic assembly. If her concurrence in this base action had resulted in any degree from mistake, from momentary illusion, or from mere persuasion, she had time to correct her error by immediate repentance: or if she had hitherto sinned with deliberation, it was a time in which conscience might hive been heard, and the wretched backslider have yet been reclaimed. This was the golden moment, the period of long-suffering and mercy, the "accepted time!" Repentance was not yet too late--return to reason and duty was not even now impossible--she might still have retracted her steps, though her worthless husband had suffered for his iniquity, and had passed the boundaries of time, the sacred enclosure, the hallowed ground where celestial mercy dispenses her pardons. Every thing was favourable to penitence. She was alone, and solitude has sometimes shaken the purpose of the sinner, and opened his eyes to an awful perception of the atrociousness of guilt. But Sapphira was "hardened through the deceitfulness of sin." Long since she had dismissed every compunctious feeling, and was hurried on to perdition by the fiends of avarice and vanity, to whom she had resigned the dominion of her soul. The inquiry of Peter, pointed and abrupt--"Tell me whether ye sold the land for so much?" Would have startled an ordinary transgressor, and produced those sensations of shame and confusion which a consciousness of detection is calculated to excite--O, if she had even then trembled, confessed her iniquity, and sought forgiveness through the blood which cleanseth from all sin, who will affirm that she could not have obtained mercy, and perhaps escaped both temporal and eternal punishment! But she was obdurate. The falsehood which Ananias had acted, she deliberately affirmed, and justice instantly dismissed her to the society of her kindred transgressor in a state of condemnation. Here, then, we read in characters too legible to be mistaken, that "it is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God."
The character of Sapphira seems to bear an even heavier weight of guilt than her husband's. She had more time to think and received a crucial warning from Peter's question. Not to mention the time she might have been alone during the various deals of the estate sale, three hours passed between the judgment on Ananias and her arrival at the apostolic gathering. If her involvement in this wicked act came from a misunderstanding, a fleeting illusion, or mere persuasion, she had time to correct her mistake through immediate repentance; or if she had sinned intentionally up to that point, it was still a moment when her conscience could have been heard and she could have been saved from her disastrous path. This was the golden opportunity, a time of patience and mercy, the "accepted time!" It wasn’t too late for repentance—she could still have returned to reason and duty—she could have changed her course, even though her worthless husband had paid the price for his wrongdoing and crossed into the realm where divine mercy offers forgiveness. Everything was right for repentance. She was alone, and solitude can sometimes shake a sinner’s resolve and make them realize the terrible nature of their guilt. But Sapphira was hardened by the deceitfulness of sin. Long ago, she had dismissed any feelings of remorse and was driven toward destruction by the spirits of greed and vanity, which she had allowed to take control of her soul. Peter’s sharp and direct question—"Tell me whether you sold the land for so much?"—would have startled an ordinary wrongdoer, stirring the feelings of shame and confusion that come with being caught. Oh, if she had even then trembled, confessed her wrongdoing, and sought forgiveness through the blood that cleanses from all sin, who can say she wouldn’t have found mercy and perhaps escaped both temporary and eternal punishment! But she was unyielding. The falsehood that Ananias had acted upon, she purposely affirmed, and justice immediately sent her to join her fellow transgressor in a state of condemnation. Here, we read in words too clear to misinterpret that "it is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God."
If we pursue this subject, it will conduct us far beyond the sight of mere temporal punishment. Sin not only incurs present misery, but has opened the gates of despair, and kindled inextinguishable flames. That wrath which must have inevitably consumed the whole of Adam's posterity, but for the Redeemer's interposition, will rage forever against the impenitent and the apostate. "Thine hand shall find out all thine enemies; thy right hand shall find out those that hate thee. Thou shall make them as a fiery oven in the time of thine anger; the Lord shall swallow them up in his wrath, and the fire shall devour them." "Upon the wicked he shall rain snares, fire and brimstone, and a horrible tempest; this shall be the portion of their cup."
If we dive into this topic, it will take us well beyond the view of just temporary punishment. Sin not only brings present suffering but has also opened the door to despair and ignited unquenchable flames. That wrath, which would have consumed all of Adam's descendants if it weren't for the Redeemer's intervention, will endlessly rage against those who are unrepentant and the fallen. "Your hand will find all your enemies; your right hand will find those who hate you. You will make them like a fiery oven in the time of your anger; the Lord will consume them in his wrath, and the fire will destroy them." "Upon the wicked, he will rain snares, fire and brimstone, and a terrible storm; this will be their portion."
It is surely wonderful to holy angels, that by persevering acts of impiety and rebellion, men should voluntarily reduce themselves to a state in which it "had been good for them if they had never been born." Can there be a more important gift than life, or a more valuable quality attached to it than immortality? Yet apostates, by their degeneracy, convert this greatest of blessings into a curse--this noblest good into an infinite evil. "As righteousness tendeth to life, so he that pursueth evil, pursueth it to his own death." Who can paint the horror of that moment, when the final, the irrevocable sentence will be passed upon a guilty race--when INFINITE LOVE will denounce INFINITE WO--when every word proceeding from the mouth of eternal justice will prove a poisoned arrow, struck into the destiny of transgressors--when that face which has always illuminated the regions of glory with smiles of ineffable grace, will gather blackness and look despair! O what a crush!--what a ruin!--what a wreck!--How many human temples, defiled by intolerable abominations, will in a moment fall into the gulf of perdition to supply its everlasting fires!--What lightnings will accompany the "thunder of his power!"--What fervid heat will melt these elements--what terror shake the lowest abyss of hell! O, could we descend to the regions of despair, whence "the smoke of their torment ascendeth up forever and ever;" or, transported on a seraph's wing, rise to listen only for a single moment, to those rapturous sounds which warble from immortal harps, and bespeak infinite felicity--with what feelings should we return to this probationary state! How should we be alarmed and allured--terrified and enraptured--deterred by "sights of wo," excited by scenes of glory! but, "if we hear not Moses and the prophets," Christ and the apostles: if "God who at sundry times, and in divers manners spake in times past unto the fathers by the prophets, hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son," to no purpose: "neither should we be persuaded though one rose from the dead."
It’s truly amazing to holy angels that through persistent acts of disrespect and rebellion, people would willingly bring themselves to a point where "it would have been better for them if they had never been born." Is there a more precious gift than life, or a more valuable aspect of it than immortality? Yet, by their own corruption, those who turn away from the faith twist this greatest blessing into a curse—this highest good into an infinite evil. "Just as righteousness leads to life, so whoever pursues evil leads to their own death." Who can capture the horror of that moment when the final, irreversible judgment will fall on a guilty world—when INFINITE LOVE will declare INFINITE WO—when every word from the mouth of eternal justice will be like a poisoned arrow, striking the fate of wrongdoers—when that face which has always filled the realms of glory with smiles of unimaginable grace will turn dark and reflect despair! Oh, what a collapse!—what a disaster!—what a wreck!—How many human lives, defiled by unbearable sins, will suddenly plunge into the pit of destruction to feed its eternal flames! What flashes of lightning will accompany the "thunder of his power!"—What intense heat will melt these elements—what fear will shake the deepest abyss of hell! Oh, if we could plunge into the depths of despair, where "the smoke of their torment rises forever and ever;" or, carried on a seraph's wing, rise up just to hear for a fleeting moment those blissful sounds that flow from immortal harps, expressing infinite happiness—how we would return to this trial-filled state! How we would be disturbed and tempted—terrified yet enchanted—deterred by "visions of woe," stirred by glimpses of glory! But, "if we do not listen to Moses and the prophets," Christ and the apostles: if "God, who spoke to our ancestors through the prophets in various ways at different times, has in these last days spoken to us by his Son," it would be futile: "we would not be convinced even if someone rose from the dead."
This dreadful history ought not to excite despondency in trembling saints. Ministerial anxieties are principally excited by a presumptuous state of mind. It is not the timid, the diffident, the cautious, that awaken apprehensions, but the forward, the fearless, the bold. That solicitude which agitates the pious mind, is an effectual antidote against the evil it dreads, while that confidence which possesses the hypocrite, prevents the good it anticipates. The one obtains through fear, the other loses through presumption. The one is victorious, by maintaining a constant petty warfare with all his corruptions; the other is over-thrown through rushing fearlessly forward, and falling into the ambuscade which Satan has prepared for him. Hypocrisy is contriving, full of artifice, and arrogant--sincerity is quite the reverse, aiming to be right--fearing mistake--avoiding even trifling deviations and slight compliances-- "sitting at the feet of Jesus"--"clothed with humility,"--and in a "right mind!"
This troubling history shouldn't lead to despair among anxious believers. Worries in ministry mainly come from an arrogant mindset. It’s not the shy, the uncertain, or the cautious that trigger fears, but those who are bold, confident, and daring. The concern that stirs a faithful mind acts as a strong defense against the evil it fears, while the self-assuredness of the hypocrite hinders the good they expect. One gains strength through fear, while the other loses it through arrogance. The former triumphs by constantly battling their flaws, while the latter is defeated by rushing ahead and falling into the traps that Satan has set for them. Hypocrisy is cunning, filled with tricks, and boastful—sincerity is the opposite, striving to do what's right, fearing mistakes, avoiding even small errors and slight compromises—"sitting at the feet of Jesus"—"clothed with humility"—and possessing a "clear mind!"
Let us adore the grace which has hitherto prevented our falling, and humbly depend upon it for future preservation. Conscious of our infantine weakness, let us lean upon the arm of Omnipotence. Under the conduct of him who directed the march of ancient Israel by the pillar of cloud by day and of fire by night, wo may hope to be upheld, protected, and guided in our journey to Canaan. Hail, happy hour, which shall put us in possession of our rest! Hail, celestial morning, whose bright beams shall disperse the shadows of death, and diffuse the splendours of immortal day upon our inheritance!
Let’s appreciate the grace that has kept us from falling and humbly rely on it for our future safety. Aware of our childlike weakness, let’s lean on the strength of the Almighty. Under the guidance of the one who led ancient Israel with a pillar of cloud by day and fire by night, we can hope to be supported, protected, and directed on our journey to Canaan. Cheers to the happy hour that will bring us our rest! Cheers to the heavenly morning, whose bright rays will chase away the shadows of death and fill our inheritance with the brilliance of eternal daylight!
In the account of the crime by which Ananias and Sapphira have acquired such an awful celebrity, the agency of SATAN is distinctly marked--"Why," said Peter, hath Satan filled thine heart?--This a subject so seldom treated, and yet of such great importance, that it seems proper to avail ourselves of this statement, in order to examine it with some attention, and to suggest some consolatory reflections to the timid Christian.
In the story of the crime that made Ananias and Sapphira infamous, the role of SATAN is clearly highlighted—"Why," Peter asked, "has Satan filled your heart?" This is a topic that is rarely discussed, yet it's very important, so it seems right to take this statement and look at it closely, as well as offer some comforting thoughts to the anxious Christian.
The earliest mention we have of Satanic influence is at the fall. Assuming the body of a serpent, this evil spirit attacked the first woman and seduced her into a transgression which "brought death into the world, and all our wo." If Satan were permitted to practise his detestable machinations in the earthly paradise, who will presume to say that it is improbable he may yet be able to tempt man in the wilderness? He knew the position of human affairs, he manifested extraordinary skill in the adaptation of the means which he employed to promote his purposes, and in the incidental conversation, which he contrived with our first parent; and although Christians have run into great extremes in their estimate of his powers, he unquestionably possesses superior knowledge and capacity. His talents like those of other wicked beings, are probably not impaired by his fall, but even sharpened and invigorated by malignant practice. In the aspect of this creation, and in the character of a degenerate world, we may perceive the infernal fiend. We may see his dark hand in the strifes of society, supplying the burning fuel to intemperate passions and discordant societies. We may mark his detestable footsteps in the field of death, staining provinces with blood, where human brothers are polluted with the guilty spirit of assassination, and sacrifice to the glory of war, the hopes of nations, the comforts of life, and the earthly existence of infuriated millions, unprepared to enter an eternal state. In these mighty tempests and desolating whirlwinds, we may hear the hissing breath of his malice, and the yell of his infernal joy. If he seduced our parent in innocency, is it incredible he should seduce her race in their apostasy? if he were the chief agent in the first of sins, is it improbable that he should instigate other crimes peculiarly connected with human misery and degradation?
The earliest mention we have of Satanic influence is at the fall. Taking on the form of a serpent, this evil spirit attacked the first woman and seduced her into a sin that "brought death into the world, and all our sorrow." If Satan was allowed to execute his vile schemes in paradise, who can claim it's unlikely he could tempt humans in the wilderness? He understood the state of human affairs and showed remarkable skill in adapting his methods to achieve his goals, especially in the conversations he had with our first parent. Although Christians have varied greatly in their views on his powers, he clearly possesses superior knowledge and ability. His talents, like those of other wicked beings, are probably not diminished by his fall but rather sharpened and strengthened by his evil actions. In the world we see around us, and in the character of a broken society, we can recognize the infernal fiend. We can see his dark influence in societal conflicts, fueling intense passions and discord. We can trace his vile mark in the realm of death, staining lands with blood, where human brothers are tainted by the guilt of murder, sacrificing to the glory of war the hopes of nations, the comforts of life, and the futures of enraged millions, unprepared for an eternal existence. In these great storms and devastating upheavals, we can hear the hissing breath of his malice and the cries of his wicked joy. If he seduced our first parent in innocence, is it so hard to believe he could seduce her descendants in their moral decline? If he was the main agent in the first sin, is it unlikely he would incite other crimes closely linked to human suffering and degradation?
Scripture, which we take as the "lamp to our feet, and light to our path," represents delusion as the appropriate work of the arch-fiend. It is not for us to inquire by what means he operates upon the mind, because we know so little of the economy of the spiritual world, of the manner in which spirit can operate on spirit, and consequently of the nature of that influence which superior beings are capable of exercising upon others in this world, that we could at best only make a vague conjecture. It is sufficient for all moral purposes to ascertain the fact, that such an influence is possible to evil spirits, and permitted by Providence, that it forms a part of the trial of good men in this state of existence, and often tends to accelerate the too rapid progress of human impiety.
Scripture, which we consider as the "lamp to our feet and light to our path," depicts delusion as the fitting work of the arch-enemy. It's not our place to question how he affects the mind, since we understand so little about the workings of the spiritual world, how one spirit can influence another, and thus the nature of the influence that higher beings can have on others in this world. At best, we can only make a vague guess. For all moral purposes, it's enough to recognize that such influence is possible for evil spirits and allowed by Providence, that it is part of the trials faced by good people in this life, and often contributes to the dangerously fast spread of human wrongdoing.
Satan then is possessed of great subtlety, and addicted to wiles, snares, and devices, for the purpose of deluding mankind. He is thus described by Christ: "He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own; for he is a liar, and the father of it." Peter, in addressing Ananias said, "Why hath Satan filled thine heart to lie to the Holy Ghost?" "We are not ignorant," says the same apostle, "of Satan's devices." "If our Gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost: in whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious Gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them."
Satan is known for his great cunning and is always using tricks, traps, and schemes to mislead humanity. Christ described him this way: "He was a murderer from the beginning and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own nature; for he is a liar and the father of lies." Peter, when speaking to Ananias, asked, "Why has Satan filled your heart to lie to the Holy Spirit?" The same apostle also said, "We are not unaware of Satan's schemes." "If our Gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing: the god of this world has blinded the minds of those who do not believe, so that the light of the glorious Gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, might not shine on them."
"I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtlety, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ." In speaking of the deceptive practices of false apostles, he thus alludes to infernal power--"No marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light." And in writing to the Ephesians, Paul exhorts--" Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil." Antichrist is described by a similar allusion: "Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan, with all power, and signs, and lying wonders, and with all deceivableness of unrighteousness." "And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit, and a great chain in his hand. And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years, and cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled; and after that he must be loosed a little season."
"I worry that, just as the serpent deceived Eve with his cleverness, your minds could be led astray from the straightforwardness of Christ." When addressing the misleading tactics of false apostles, he references demonic power: "It's not surprising, since Satan himself disguises himself as an angel of light." In his letter to the Ephesians, Paul urges, "Put on the full armor of God so you can stand against the schemes of the devil." Antichrist is described with a similar reference: "He will come in accordance with the work of Satan, with all power, signs, and false wonders, and with every kind of deception." "And I saw an angel come down from heaven, holding the key to the abyss and a huge chain. He seized the dragon, that ancient serpent, who is the devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years, throwing him into the abyss and locking it, sealing it over him so he could no longer deceive the nations until the thousand years were over; after that, he must be released for a short time."
Satan doubtless attacks mankind by diversified modes of operation, and deceives them on various occasions and by different means. In the parabolical representations of our Lord, he is described as "sowing tares in the field," and as "coming immediately" where the word is sown, "to take away the word that was sown in their hearts." This is indeed a figurative statement, but nevertheless descriptive of a fact. The essence of the representation is real, though decked out in the attractive garb of imagery, to win attention and to excite inquiry. To suppose otherwise in this or in other cases, would be to reduce Scripture to the standard of Tales for Children, or Arabian Nights' Entertainments. What, then, is the truth intended to be conveyed here? It is that Satan possesses some mode of access to the human mind, that he is peculiarly attentive to the impression which the ministry of the word is producing, and that he uses his utmost skill to neutralize its effect: probably, by tempting the hearer to doubt its truth, to dispute its importance, or to defer immediate regard to its holy requisitions. And in the human heart there is such an ample supply of materials upon which to work--such a tendency to evil--such depravity of spirit--such corruption of nature--such love of the world--such enmity against God, that he soon succeeds in erecting an edifice of delusory hope, in which the deluded soul takes shelter from the sharp-pointed arrows of ministerial fidelity and scriptural appeal.
Satan undoubtedly attacks humanity in various ways, deceiving people on different occasions and through different methods. In the parables told by our Lord, he's depicted as "sowing tares in the field" and as "coming immediately" where the word is sown, "to take away the word that was sown in their hearts." This is indeed a figurative expression, but it still represents a reality. The core of the message is real, even if it's presented in an engaging way to grab attention and encourage curiosity. To think otherwise in this or similar situations would be to reduce Scripture to the level of children's stories or Arabian Nights' tales. So, what truth is being conveyed here? It is that Satan has some way of accessing the human mind, that he pays special attention to the impact of the ministry of the word, and that he uses his best skills to undermine its effects: probably by tempting the listener to doubt its truth, question its importance, or postpone responding to its sacred demands. In the human heart, there's such an abundance of raw material to work with—such a tendency toward evil—such a depravity of spirit—such a corruption of nature—such a love of the world—such hostility toward God, that he quickly succeeds in building a false sense of hope, where the misled soul seeks refuge from the penetrating arrows of ministerial honesty and scriptural truth.
"Your adversary the devil," is represented as walking "about, seeking whom he may devour;" which intimates the settled enmity of this spirit. He is your adversary--at once the most malignant, most subtle, most invisible, and often least suspected of all others. This passage describes his powerful superiority; he is a roaring lion--remarkable for fury, strength, and zeal. It represents his incessant activity, secrecy, and watchfulness; "he walketh about." It proclaims his destructive purpose--"to devour." He is not, it seems, confined to place, but fixed in torment, and destined in all ages to suffer a perpetual aggravation of his misery, in consequence of the increase of his guilt, and the frequent discomfiture of his devices.
"Your enemy the devil" is described as roaming "around, looking for someone to devour;" which indicates the deep-seated hostility of this being. He is your enemy—the most vicious, cunning, hardest to see, and often the least suspected of all. This passage highlights his powerful dominance; he is a roaring lion—notable for his rage, strength, and fervor. It showcases his constant activity, secrecy, and vigilance; "he walks around." It declares his destructive intent—"to devour." He doesn't seem to be limited to one place but is trapped in torment, destined to suffer an endless increase in his misery due to his growing guilt and the frequent failures of his schemes.
The severest contests of the Christian are with this adversary, who, being possessed of insinuating subtlety, powerful resources, constant vigilance, distinguished sagacity, and invisible means of operation, combined with infernal malignity, must be acknowledged to be a most formidable foe. It is both needless and unscriptural to assign ubiquity to Satan, but by himself and his emissaries he undoubtedly possesses a very extensive range in this lower world, and his favourite employment is to cherish the rebellious principle, to perpetuate the backsliding character, and thus to form the finished apostate. He observes with a vigilant inspection every tree planted in the garden of the Lord, and provided there be no real fruits of righteousness, he is not displeased at the leaves of profession. He knows this will never prevent the decree, "Cut it down, why cumbereth it the ground?"
The toughest battles for Christians are against this enemy, who, with his cunning tricks, powerful resources, constant watchfulness, sharp intellect, and hidden methods, combined with evil intentions, is definitely a serious opponent. It's unnecessary and unbiblical to say that Satan is everywhere, but he and his followers certainly have a wide influence in this world, and his main job is to nurture rebellion, encourage a life of backsliding, and create a complete apostate. He watches every tree in the Lord's garden closely, and as long as there are no real fruits of righteousness, he is perfectly fine with the mere appearance of faith. He knows this will never stop the command, "Cut it down, why does it take up space on the ground?"
Pregnant with horrors as this subject appears to be, the Scriptures supply two most desirable sources of consolation, with the mention of which I shall hasten to conclude it.
Pregnant with horrors as this subject appears to be, the Scriptures provide two highly desirable sources of comfort, which I will quickly mention before concluding.
1. While considering the terrific facts of the existence and works of the devil, recollect the limitation of his agency. If no kind of restraint were imposed upon his efforts, if his untractable malice were allowed to act with all its diabolical force, and were absolutely under no restrictions, the idea of his being and of his malignity would be unutterably appalling: but the giant foe is held in the mighty grasp of Omnipotence. His power is only permitted to operate to a certain extent, and under the regulations of certain laws ordained by the eternal mind. He who says to the raging ocean, "Here shall thy proud waves be stayed," assigns the sphere of infernal influence, and places impassable barriers of a moral nature to his further encroachment. Evil of every description, and evil beings of every order, are under divine superintendence and control. The lion is chained--the dragon cannot add one cubit to his stature--a point to his tongue--or a drop to his venom. The serpent may hiss, but he cannot devour.
1. While thinking about the shocking facts regarding the existence and actions of the devil, remember the limitations of his power. If there were no restrictions on his efforts, if his uncontrollable malice were allowed to act with full force and faced no limitations, the concept of his being and his wickedness would be incredibly terrifying: but this giant enemy is held in the powerful grip of Omnipotence. His power is only allowed to operate to a certain degree and under specific laws set by the eternal mind. He who commands the raging ocean, "Here your proud waves will be stopped," determines the extent of infernal influence and places unbreakable moral barriers to his further advance. All forms of evil and evil beings of every kind are under divine supervision and control. The lion is chained—the dragon cannot grow any bigger—add anything to its reach—or increase its venom. The serpent may hiss, but it cannot consume.
The influence of Satan resembles every other test that Divine Wisdom sees fit to apply to human character. It is probationary. The people of God are put to the proof, and their principles subjected to fiery trials. But gold will endure the furnace, and real piety will "resist the devil, and he will flee." He could tempt the Son of God, and he can torment his followers; but he possesses no compulsory power. His attacks can never be successful, unless we give them efficacy by our criminal negligence and compliance.
The influence of Satan is like any other test that Divine Wisdom sees necessary to apply to human character. It serves as a trial. The people of God are challenged, and their principles face intense scrutiny. But gold can withstand the furnace, and true piety will "resist the devil, and he will flee." He was able to tempt the Son of God, and he can torment his followers; however, he has no power to force anyone. His attacks can only succeed if we empower them through our negligence and compliance.
Nor is it just to suppose, as many good people do to their inexpressible but useless alarm, that every individual is under his constant power, or every moment exposed to his incessant attacks. This would be to assign him a degree of omnipresence wholly incompatible with his nature and the economy of providence. Like other evil beings he walketh about. His movements may be more rapid as a spirit, and his capacities more extended and certainly his malignity more violent, than those of other wicked beings; still he is hut a creature--he has his appointed sphere of exertion--his capacities are finite--and he is observed by the unsleeping eye of God. He may prowl around the sheepfold of Christ, but the guard is too strong for him; and if he seize, or attempt the feeblest of the flock, Omnipotence will ultimately rescue the prey from the hand of the terrible.
It’s not fair to assume, as many well-meaning people do with their deep but pointless fear, that every individual is constantly under his control or at risk of his relentless attacks every moment. That would be to give him a level of omnipresence that doesn’t fit his nature or the workings of providence. Like other evil beings, he prowls around. His movements might be quicker as a spirit, and his abilities might be broader, and certainly, his malice is more intense than that of other wicked beings; still, he is just a creature—he has his designated area of influence—his powers are limited—and he is watched by the ever-vigilant eye of God. He may lurk around Christ’s flock, but the protection is too strong for him; and if he captures or tries to harm even the weakest of the flock, Omnipotence will ultimately save the victim from the grip of the evil one.
2. Let us realize with holy satisfaction the destruction of Satanic power. "For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil." The apostle John, in his Revelation, describes "the devil" as "cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night forever and ever."
2. Let’s recognize with holy satisfaction the destruction of Satanic power. "For this purpose, the Son of God was revealed, so that he could destroy the works of the devil." The apostle John, in his Revelation, describes "the devil" as "cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and will be tormented day and night forever and ever."
In conceiving of the destruction of this hateful dominion, we may realize it as certain. Although the issue of the war between good and evil, Christ and Belial, heaven and hell, be deferred to a distant age, it is not doubtful or precarious. It is ever present in the eye of God, and forms a part of that irresistible destiny which infernal power cannot avert. There is no escape from the chains of darkness which Omnipotence will finally rivet on; and this irreversible doom of fallen spirits is essential to the final arrangements of that wonderful period, which will develope "the consummation of all things."
In thinking about the downfall of this hateful rule, we might see it as certain. Even though the battle between good and evil, Christ and Belial, heaven and hell might be pushed to a distant time, it is not uncertain or shaky. It is always present in God's view, and it’s part of that unstoppable fate that evil cannot escape. There’s no way to break free from the chains of darkness that Omnipotence will ultimately enforce; and this unavoidable judgment of fallen beings is crucial to the final setup of that amazing time, which will reveal "the consummation of all things."
It is the glory of the religion of Christ, that none of its promises or plans are precarious. The hopes of Christians cannot be lost in the crush of nature or the wreck of the world; and the condemnation of impenitent sinners and of Satan cannot be averted by any mistake of evidence, by any confusion, of multitude, or by any unevenness of balance in the scales of justice in the day of judgment.
It is the greatness of Christianity that none of its promises or plans are uncertain. The hopes of Christians can’t be destroyed by the chaos of nature or the downfall of the world; the punishment of unrepentant sinners and of Satan cannot be changed by any errors in evidence, by any confusion from the crowd, or by any imbalance in the scales of justice on judgment day.
The destruction of Satan and his power may be considered as gradual in the mode of its accomplishment. The whole system of revealed truth, from the period of the first prediction, points to this predestined end; and the whole scheme of Providence, including the rise and fall of empires, the work of Christ, and all the events of time through successive generations, respects this mighty and this marvellous result--a result connected so essentially with the glory of God, the honour of Christ, and the felicity of a redeemed universe.
The defeat of Satan and his power can be seen as gradual in how it happens. The entire system of revealed truth, starting from the first prediction, points to this intended outcome; and the whole plan of Providence, including the rise and fall of empires, the work of Christ, and all historical events through different generations, is aimed at this incredible and powerful result—one that is deeply intertwined with the glory of God, the honor of Christ, and the happiness of a redeemed universe.
"For this purpose the Son of God was manifested that he might destroy the works of the devil." But it was not deemed fit to do it at once, and at a single blow; if it had, he who commanded the boisterous winds and the raging seas, and they were still--he who expelled demons at a word, and cured diseases by a touch--he whose creative energy restored lost limbs to the victims of misery--who reanimated the dead and the putrifying, and remanded their spirits from an invisible state--could have withered at a touch the power of hell, crushed in a moment the throne of diabolical authority, and bound the dragon himself in his eternal chain. But the wisdom of God, which at first permitted evil to stain his moral creation, designs to admit the reign or influence of Satan for an appointed period, and to overturn his dominion by a gradual establishment of truth and righteousness in the earth. The great adversary was smitten by his hand when the first promise of salvation was given to our race; the stroke was repeated, in successive predictions to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; and the death-blow inflicted when the expiring Redeemer exclaimed on the cross, "It is finished!" Still, like a dying monster, who raves amidst his agonies, and terrifies spectators by his terrific aspect and more terrific efforts, and destroys or mangles all who venture within the reach of his arm, Satan still rages and raves--sometimes languishing into comparative inaction, at other times breathing out threatening and slaughter against the church of God--still conscious that his power is declining, and that the whole system of providence is preparing for his final overthrow.
"For this reason, the Son of God was revealed to destroy the works of the devil." However, it wasn't considered appropriate to do it all at once and in a single act; if it had been, the one who commanded the raging winds and stormy seas, and they obeyed—who cast out demons with a word, and healed diseases with a touch—who restored lost limbs to those suffering—who brought the dead back to life and called their spirits from an unseen state—could have easily defeated the power of hell with a single touch, crushed the throne of evil in an instant, and chained the dragon forever. But the wisdom of God, which initially allowed evil to taint His moral creation, intends to let Satan's reign or influence exist for a set time, and to eventually overthrow his dominion by gradually establishing truth and righteousness on earth. The great adversary was struck when the first promise of salvation was given to humanity; the blow was repeated in further predictions to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; and the fatal blow was delivered when the dying Redeemer cried out on the cross, "It is finished!" Yet, like a dying monster, who rages in pain and frightens onlookers with his horrific presence and desperate actions, harming or maiming anyone who comes within his reach, Satan continues to lash out—sometimes fading into relative inactivity, at other times issuing threats and violence against the Church of God—still aware that his power is waning, and that the entire system of providence is gearing up for his ultimate defeat.
This overthrow will be complete. He will never more ascend from his confinement, to fill the earth with plagues or the church of Christ with terror. The "new heaven and earth wherein dwelleth righteousness," will never be exposed to his awful revisitings--the contest will have for ever ended--the struggle eternally ceased; and the harps of angels, with the holy hymnings of ten thousand times ten thousand before the throne--
This overthrow will be complete. He will never rise again from his confinement to spread plagues across the earth or instill fear in the church of Christ. The "new heaven and earth where righteousness dwells" will never be subjected to his terrifying returns—the struggle will have ended forever; the fight will be eternally over; and the harps of angels, along with the holy hymns of countless thousands before the throne—
"Blest voices, uttering praise!"
"Blessed voices, singing praise!"
will proclaim the full, the final, the everlasting victory. And in the heavenly city "there shall be no more curse; but the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it; and his servants shall serve him: and they shall see his face; and his name shall be in their foreheads. And there shall be no night there; and they need no candle, neither light of the sun; for the Lord God giveth them light: and they shall reign for ever and ever." (See APPENDIX.)
will proclaim the complete, final, and eternal victory. And in the heavenly city "there shall be no more curse; but the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it; and his servants shall serve him: and they shall see his face; and his name shall be in their foreheads. And there shall be no night there; and they need no candle, neither light of the sun; for the Lord God gives them light: and they shall reign forever and ever." (See APPENDIX.)
Dorcas.
Chapter X.
Joppa illustrious on many accounts, particularly as the residence of Dorcas--she was a Disciple of Christ--Faith described as the Principle of Discipleship--the inspired Testimony to the Character of Dorcas--she was probably a Widow or an aged Maiden--Remarks on the Reproaches commonly cast upon the latter Class of Women--Dorcas exhibited as a Pattern of liberality, being prompt in the Relief she afforded--her Charities abundant--and personally bestowed--Observations on the Propriety of visiting the Poor--the Charities of Dorcas often free and unsolicited--wise and conducted upon a Plan--the Pretences of the uncharitable stated and confuted--Riches only valuable as they are used in bountiful Distribution.
Joppa is notable for many reasons, especially as the home of Dorcas—she was a Disciple of Christ. Faith is described as the foundation of Discipleship. There's an inspired account that highlights Dorcas's character; she was likely a widow or an older woman. There are comments on the criticisms often directed at the latter group of women. Dorcas serves as an example of generosity, always quick to help those in need—her charitable actions were plentiful and personally offered. There are thoughts on the importance of visiting the needy. The charities of Dorcas were often given freely and without being asked—thoughtful and organized with a purpose. The excuses of those who are uncharitable are addressed and refuted. Wealth is only valuable when used for generous sharing.
Seven of the most celebrated cities of antiquity (Smyrna, Rhodes, Colophon, Salamis, Chios, Argos, and Athens) are said to have disputed the glory of having given birth to Homer; and it must be admitted that places and families acquire an importance from their connection with names which appear conspicuous on the page of history, and have been praised by the united voices of successive generations. We cannot hear, without an instinctive glow, of the cities of Rome, Athens, Sparta, Syracuse, and others which respectively produced a Cæsar, a Demosthenes, a Lycurgus, and an Archimedes; of the islands of Samos and Ægina, whence emanated the resplendent genius of a Pythagoras and a Plato; of the villages of Alopece and Andes, immortalized as having produced a Socrates and a Virgil.
Seven of the most famous cities of ancient times (Smyrna, Rhodes, Colophon, Salamis, Chios, Argos, and Athens) are said to have competed for the honor of being Homer's birthplace. It's true that places and families gain significance from their association with names that stand out in history and have been celebrated by generations of people. We can't help but feel a sense of pride when we hear about the cities of Rome, Athens, Sparta, Syracuse, and others that produced legendary figures like Cæsar, Demosthenes, Lycurgus, and Archimedes; or the islands of Samos and Ægina, which inspired the brilliant minds of Pythagoras and Plato; or the towns of Alopece and Andes, forever remembered for being the homes of Socrates and Virgil.
But let not the enchanting annals of Roman literature or Grecian wisdom detach our minds from the nobler records of inspiration, or diminish the conviction which religion must ever inspire, that the birth place of benevolence and piety is more illustrious than the birthplace of genius and philosophy. On this principle we look with admiration upon the town of Joppa, which, if it cannot boast a prodigy of valour, talent, or learning, is nevertheless conspicuous as the residence of one "of whom the world was not worthy." She was not, indeed, rich in wealth, but in good works. She was not a conqueror of nations or a distributor of crowns, but a giver of alms. She had no name on earth beyond the limits of a small Christian church, but her record was on high, and her memorial has not perished with her.
But let's not let the captivating stories of Roman literature or Greek wisdom distract us from the greater truths of inspiration, or lessen the belief that the birthplace of compassion and faith is far more significant than the birthplace of talent and philosophy. With this idea in mind, we admire the town of Joppa, which, although it may not boast extraordinary feats of bravery, skill, or knowledge, is notable as the home of someone "of whom the world was not worthy." She wasn't rich in material wealth, but in good deeds. She wasn't a conqueror of nations or a distributor of crowns, but a giver of charity. Her name might not have reached beyond the boundaries of a small Christian community, but her legacy lives on, and her memory has not faded away.
Joppa was the nearest seaport to Jerusalem on the Mediterranean. It was situated in the tribe of Dan in a fine plain, and has acquired the modern name of Jaffa. This place is frequently mentioned in Scripture. The materials for the construction of Solomon's temple were sent thither in floats, by Hiram, the king of Tyre, whence they were easily conveyed by land to Jerusalem. Jonah, in his flight from the presence of the Lord, embarked at this port, and gave occasion to the mythological fable of Andromeda. Here the apostle Peter enjoyed that remarkable vision, in which he saw heaven opened, and a great sheet descending to the earth, which seemed to contain every variety of beasts, and creeping things, and fowls of the air; intimating to him the abolition of the Mosaic law, and the removal of those distinctions which had so long separated the Jews and the Gentiles. It is probable Philip preached the Gospel here in his progress through various cities to Cesarea; but the history of Dorcas, or, as she was originally called in the Syriac dialect, Tabitha, has given it peculiar prominence in the sacred page.
Joppa was the nearest seaport to Jerusalem on the Mediterranean. It was located in the tribe of Dan in a beautiful plain, and has the modern name of Jaffa. This place is frequently mentioned in the Bible. The materials for building Solomon's temple were sent there on rafts by Hiram, the king of Tyre, from where they were easily transported overland to Jerusalem. Jonah, while trying to escape from the Lord, set sail from this port, which contributed to the mythological story of Andromeda. Here, the apostle Peter had that remarkable vision in which he saw heaven opened, and a large sheet descending to the earth, appearing to contain every kind of animal, creeping thing, and bird; indicating to him the end of the Mosaic law and the removal of the barriers that had long separated Jews and Gentiles. It's likely that Philip preached the Gospel here on his journey through various cities to Cesarea; however, the story of Dorcas, or as she was originally called in the Syriac language, Tabitha, has given it special significance in the sacred text.
The memorial of this excellent woman is short, but replete with instruction. Her character is sketched at a stroke, and by the introduction of an incident as full of significance and interest as can well be imagined. Dropping those minute details and accidental circumstances which are not necessary to character, and which the New Testament so seldom mentions, the most instructive part of her story is preserved and set in the most brilliant point of light.
The tribute to this remarkable woman is brief but full of valuable lessons. Her character is outlined clearly, highlighted by an event that is as meaningful and captivating as one could imagine. Leaving out the minor details and random occurrences that aren’t essential to understanding her character—which the New Testament rarely addresses—the most enlightening aspects of her story are retained and presented in the best possible light.
She is simply announced, in the first place, as "a certain disciple," or one that embraced the faith of Christ, and professed it by baptism and a public union with his church. Whatever might be her situation in other respects was of little consequence; this was her best, her most substantial distinction. It invested her with a real glory, which however overlooked by those who are chiefly attracted by exterior splendour, surpassed every vain and glittering honour of the world. It raised her to the dignity of a name in the volume of inspiration, and the unfading distinction of a place in the annals of eternity.
She is simply introduced as "a certain disciple," meaning someone who accepted the faith of Christ and showed it through baptism and a public joining with his church. Whatever her situation might have been in other areas didn't matter much; this was her greatest and most significant distinction. It gave her a true sense of honor, which, although ignored by those who are mostly drawn to outward appearances, surpassed every empty and showy recognition of the world. It elevated her to the honor of being mentioned in the sacred text, and the lasting distinction of having a place in the records of eternity.
How poor and how perishable is human fame; and yet with what eagerness is it universally sought! What is it but like a bubble, excited by some accidental cause, to sparkle for a moment on the stream of passing ages, and then to disappear for ever! And yet the love of fame has been called, and perhaps with propriety, the ruling passion; for so much does it blend itself with human motives, that there are comparatively few of our actions, at least such as are visible to the public eye, which may not be traced to this feeling, or which do not receive a tone from its influence.
How fleeting and fragile is human fame; and yet how eagerly it is pursued by everyone! What is it but a bubble, stirred up by some random event, that sparkles for a moment on the surface of time, only to vanish forever? Still, the desire for fame has been referred to, and rightly so, as the driving passion; because it intertwines so deeply with human motivations that there are relatively few of our actions, especially those visible to the public, which cannot be linked to this desire, or which aren’t influenced by it.
But how shall we describe that faith which is often mentioned in the New Testament, which so marked the character of Dorcas, and which, perhaps, may not be inaptly called the principle of discipleship?
But how should we describe that faith which is often talked about in the New Testament, which so defined Dorcas's character, and which, perhaps, may not be incorrectly referred to as the principle of discipleship?
This term is of various import, and of very extensive application in Scripture. It signifies belief, and refers to testimony either human or divine; but is restricted in its evangelical use to the latter. Revelation in general is the object of faith: and those invisible realities which it discloses to the mental eye are seen with equal distinctness, and believed with equal conviction, as if they were capable, from possessing some material quality, of impressing the corporeal senses. Faith glorifies its great Object and Author by paying an implicit deference to his authority. It asks no other bond than his promise, no other evidence or attestation than his veracity. It not only ranges through worlds which mortal eye could never explore, but which human reason could never discover: and as by transgression man has fallen under the dominion of his senses, it delivers its happy possessor from this state of degradation and wretchedness.
This term has various meanings and is widely used in Scripture. It signifies belief and refers to testimony, either human or divine; however, in a religious context, it specifically refers to the latter. Revelation as a whole is what we have faith in, and the invisible truths it reveals to our minds are seen as clearly and believed with as much certainty as if they could impact our physical senses due to some tangible quality. Faith honors its great Object and Author by showing complete respect for His authority. It requires no assurance other than His promise, no proof or validation beyond His truthfulness. It not only explores realms that the human eye could never see but also areas that human reason could never uncover; and as sin has led humanity to be dominated by the senses, faith frees its fortunate holder from this state of misery and decline.
But though this be a general signification of the word, its more precise and appropriate use in the Gospel is expressed by the phrase, "believing that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God." Here the general and the particular use are necessarily blended. Faith is belief--but belief in "the truth as it is in Jesus." To believe, in the ordinary sense, is to admit a fact, to assent to the statement of an accredited or respectable witness; to believe in Jesus as the Son of God, is to acknowledge his real character, to perceive his true dignity, to view and to love him, not only as distinguished by perfect excellence; but as specifically the Saviour of lost sinners; for "whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ, is born of God." Faith comprehends what he is, contemplates him in all his glorious offices, and from the manger of meanness traces him to the throne of power, relying upon what he has suffered and said as the infallible pledge of what he will accomplish. It is not only well informed, but humble. It resided in his heart who exclaimed, "Lord, save me!" It dictated his language who cried out, "Lord, remember me when thou comest into thy kingdom." It gave efficacy to the prayer of that humble petitioner who said, "Speak the word only, and my servant shall be healed." It is pleasing to God, essential to salvation, and his own gift: for "Enoch had this testimony, that he pleased God"--"a man is justified by faith"--and "by grace ye are saved through faith, and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God."
But while this is a general meaning of the word, its more specific and fitting use in the Gospel is captured by the phrase, "believing that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God." Here, the general and specific meanings are intertwined. Faith is belief—but belief in "the truth as it is in Jesus." To believe, in the usual sense, is to accept a fact, to agree with the statement of a credible or respected witness; to believe in Jesus as the Son of God means to recognize his true nature, to see his real worth, to regard and love him not only for his perfect excellence, but specifically as the Savior of lost sinners; for "whoever believes that Jesus is the Christ is born of God." Faith includes who he is, considers him in all his glorious roles, and traces his story from the humble manger to the powerful throne, depending on what he has endured and said as a sure promise of what he will achieve. It is not only well-informed but also humble. It lived in the heart of the one who exclaimed, "Lord, save me!" It guided the words of the one who cried out, "Lord, remember me when you come into your kingdom." It gave power to the prayer of that humble person who said, "Just say the word, and my servant will be healed." It pleases God, is essential for salvation, and is his gift: for "Enoch was commended as one who pleased God"—"a person is justified by faith"—and "by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not from yourselves; it is the gift of God."
Faith is not dormant, but active and operative. It resembles good seed sown in the cultivated soil, which expands, and grows, and produces fruit. This holy vegetation exists in very different degrees of vigour, according to the diversities of Christian character, but it is apparent in all--the mark of true religion, the pleasing verdant hue that covers the whole surface of the spiritual creation. We cannot point to every pious person as a Dorcas, who presents a singular fertility of some of the noblest graces; but of all it may be said, "the root of the matter is found in them," and "their root shall not be rottenness, nor their blossom go up as dust."
Faith isn't passive; it's active and effective. It’s like good seed planted in well-tended soil, which expands, grows, and bears fruit. This spiritual growth varies in strength depending on different types of Christian character, but it’s evident in everyone—the sign of genuine faith, the vibrant green that covers the entirety of spiritual life. We can’t say that every devout person is like Dorcas, showcasing a unique abundance of the finest virtues; however, it can be said of all, "the root of the matter is found in them," and "their root shall not be rottenness, nor their blossom go up as dust."
It is the nature of genuine faith to stimulate to the most laborious duties, to sustain amidst the most poignant sufferings, to produce the greatest purity of character, to communicate the noblest kind of happiness of which a creature in the present state can be susceptible, to nerve the feeblest arm with strength, to give the dullest eye perception, above all, to "work by love." For these reasons, and because of its transforming influence, we denominated it the principle of discipleship. It operates by love to its object and to all its subjects, as well as to the divine commandments in general; and influences its possessor to practise universal philanthropy. To the latter our particular attention is now directed by the example of Dorcas; but it must not be forgotten, that though the particular specimen of her excellence be taken from the common offices of kindness and the act of almsgiving, the existence and proportionate vigour of the great principle from which her minor charities resulted must be presupposed, as by observing the fertility of a branch, or the verdure of a twig, or even the greenness of a leaf, we infer the growth of the tree, its root, its stem, and all its various ramifications. While we contemplate this flourishing plant of grace, we know that it was deeply "rooted and grounded" in faith.
Genuine faith naturally drives us to take on the toughest challenges, helps us endure the deepest suffering, fosters the highest purity of character, brings the greatest happiness possible, empowers the weakest among us, sharpens the dullest perceptions, and ultimately "works through love." For these reasons, and due to its transformative power, we call this the principle of discipleship. It acts out of love for its object and everyone involved, as well as for divine commandments in general, influencing its holder to practice universal kindness. Right now, we’re focusing on this idea through the example of Dorcas; however, we must remember that while her acts of kindness and charity are highlighted, we must assume the existence and strength of the underlying principle that drives her smaller acts of charity. Just as we can tell a tree's health by looking at the abundance of its branches, leaves, or twigs, we can infer the growth of the tree from its roots, trunk, and branches. As we observe this thriving plant of grace, we understand that it is deeply "rooted and grounded" in faith.
The inspired testimony is as follows: "This woman was full of good works and alms-deeds, which she did." Amongst other acts of beneficence, she was accustomed to make "coats and garments" for "the widows." Her own circumstances are not specified. If she were poor, as the mass of Christian converts in the apostolic times appears to have been, her readiness in furnishing these supplies was admirable indeed. As Paul testified of the Macedonian believers, she contributed to the utmost, yea, and beyond her power: nor are these solitary instances of persons willingly impoverishing themselves in obedience to the fine impulse of a pious sympathy. While others have calculated, they have acted, incapable of a cold arithmetic and a measured benevolence. If Dorcas were rich, she is perhaps entitled to a still higher commendation. So many are the obstructions which "great possessions" cast in the way of charity, so many temptations to a lavish expenditure, beset the opulent, and to support this, on the other hand, to a parsimonious, saving habit; so easy is it to frame excuses, and by trifling precautions to escape importunity, or at once to silent it; that it may well excite both wonder and delight to find charity associated with splendour. It is surprising, however, and no less deplorable than surprising, that persons of this class will not consider for a moment, how easily, with how few sacrifices even of time or money, they might be extensively useful. A single drop of supply from their replenished cup of worldly prosperity, would often make "the widow's heart sing for joy," and prove a healing cordial to the sufferings of perishing humanity. A slight taxation upon even acknowledged superfluity, would in some cases produce an ample revenue for many indigent families, although religion claims on their behalf more than a scanty and unwilling pittance; for "he which soweth sparingly shall reap also sparingly; and he which soweth bountifully, shall reap also bountifully. Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give; not grudgingly or of necessity, for God loveth a cheerful giver."
The inspired testimony says: "This woman was full of good works and charitable deeds, which she did." Among other acts of kindness, she regularly made "coats and garments" for "the widows." Her own situation isn’t mentioned. If she was poor, like most Christian converts in the early church seemed to be, her willingness to provide these supplies was truly admirable. As Paul noted about the Macedonian believers, she contributed to the fullest extent, even beyond what she could manage: there are many examples of people willingly giving up their own resources in response to a genuine feeling of compassion. While others have calculated their giving, they have acted without being cold or calculating about their generosity. If Dorcas was rich, she deserves even greater praise. There are so many obstacles that "great possessions" put in the way of charity, and so many temptations to overspend that affect wealthy individuals, making it easy to justify keeping their wealth to themselves and avoiding any discomfort. It's both surprising and unfortunate that people in this position won’t consider how easily, with very few sacrifices of their time or money, they could be greatly beneficial. Just a small contribution from their overflowing wealth could often make "the widow's heart sing for joy" and provide a much-needed remedy for the suffering of those in need. Even a slight contribution from excess would provide significant support for many struggling families, although religion asks for more than just a meager and reluctant donation; for "he which soweth sparingly shall reap also sparingly; and he which soweth bountifully shall reap also bountifully. Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give; not grudgingly or of necessity, for God loveth a cheerful giver."
From the sacred narrative, we are led to infer that Dorcas was either a widow herself, possessed perhaps of a moderate competence, a state which seems of all others the most favourable to a benevolent disposition; or one of the class of females, sometimes designated by the reproachful epithet of old maids. And having introduced the term, it may not be improper to make a short digression upon this subject.
From the sacred story, we can gather that Dorcas was either a widow herself, maybe with a decent amount of money, which seems to be the most favorable situation for a kind nature; or she was one of the women often labeled with the unflattering term of old maids. Now that we've mentioned it, it might be worth taking a brief detour on this topic.
It cannot be doubted that a life of celibacy is unnatural, and contrary to the general appointment of Infinite Wisdom; consequently, a voluntary seclusion of this kind from the duties of our proper sphere as social beings, unless the case be very remarkable, and the counteracting obligation singularly clear, must deserve censure. By this conduct whatever important results are connected with the marriage union by the law of Providence, are deliberately opposed, and the principle is no less sinful than it is pernicious. But the case of determined celibacy is far less common among females than with the other sex, and where it does exist, is usually attended with less evil effects upon the good of society.
It’s clear that living a life of celibacy goes against nature and the overall plan of Infinite Wisdom. Therefore, choosing to isolate oneself from our responsibilities as social beings, unless there are very exceptional circumstances and a strong reason to do so, should be criticized. This choice actively goes against the important outcomes associated with marriage as intended by Providence, and the principle is just as harmful as it is wrong. However, the choice of lifelong celibacy is much less common among women than men, and when it does occur, it tends to have fewer negative effects on society’s well-being.
In respect to the two most frequent occasions of continuing single, among women of piety, the one demands admiration, the other pity; but neither can, without a total dereliction of all reason and propriety, excite ridicule. The first which has been made, is that of a voluntary resignation of the pleasures and solicitudes of matrimony, for the sake of more extensive usefulness, and at the call of duty. Such is the case of women who deem themselves required, or are considered by others as remarkably qualified for foreign and missionary service in the cause of God, or who, from the high tone of their irreligious feeling, have ascended to an unusual degree of spiritual elevation of character, and whether called to labour abroad or at home, are desirous of an entire and incessant self-devotement to Jesus Christ. These instances are indeed rare, and can scarcely be estimated by ordinary rules, but they were not unprecedented in the primitive age of Christianity. Dorcas might possibly be a woman of this extraordinary character. Her works were at least worthy of one who was thus bearing the cross, for "the kingdom of heaven's sake."
Regarding the two most common reasons for remaining single among devout women, one is admirable and the other evokes sympathy; however, neither should ever be subject to ridicule, as that would completely ignore reason and propriety. The first reason is a voluntary choice to give up the pleasures and responsibilities of marriage in pursuit of greater usefulness and in response to duty. This applies to women who believe they are called, or are regarded by others as particularly suited, for foreign and missionary work in service to God, or who, prompted by strong feelings of faith, have reached a higher level of spiritual devotion. Whether they are called to work abroad or at home, they wish to wholly dedicate themselves to Jesus Christ. These examples are indeed rare and can't be judged by ordinary standards, but they were not unheard of in the early days of Christianity. Dorcas could very well have been such a remarkable woman. Her deeds were certainly worthy of someone undertaking this kind of self-sacrifice "for the sake of the kingdom of heaven."
The second class of aged single females presents a subject for compassionate sympathy. They are not solitaries by choice, but necessity: and whoever sports with their destiny, betrays a cruel, if not a wicked mind. They have already been the prey of disappointments the most agonizing to the mind; let them not be the objects of unmeaning contempt or impious sarcasm. There was a time when the morning of life rose upon them in all its enchantment and beauty. Every thing around them smiled, and their yet unwithered hopes were alive to every delightful impression. Who knows but the object of their tenderest earthly affection was severed from them by death, whose murderous instrument inflicted an incurable wound? Who can say, but that the very sex which dares to load them with contumely for their solitary condition, was, by its base flatteries and delusive promises, the very occasion of their unhappiness? Who can deny, but that religion itself might have been honoured by their noble heroism, in refusing the solicitations of some, who, although distinguished for many accomplishments, possessions, and connexions, were either enemies to the Gospel or indifferent about it? They trembled, perhaps, to please their taste, and "lose their own souls."
The second group of older single women deserves our compassionate sympathy. They are not alone by choice, but out of necessity; anyone who makes fun of their situation shows a cruel, if not wicked, mindset. They have already suffered the most painful disappointments; let's not make them targets of meaningless contempt or impious sarcasm. There was a time when the beginning of their lives shone with all its enchantment and beauty. Everything around them was uplifting, and their hopes were vibrant with every delightful experience. Who knows if the object of their deepest earthly affection was taken from them by death, which inflicted an irreversible wound? Who can say that the very people who mock them for being alone are the ones who, through their empty flattery and false promises, caused their unhappiness? Who can deny that religion itself could have been enriched by their noble strength in resisting the advances of those who, despite being accomplished and well-connected, were either enemies of the Gospel or indifferent to it? They might have feared, perhaps, pleasing their own desires and "losing their own souls."
Nameless and numberless may be the occasion of an involuntary, and therefore justifiable celibacy. Besides, how has this condition been improved! How have some of these venerable women gone about doing good! What a wise and holy improvement have they made of the dispensations of providence! Their very disappointments have become the means of increased zeal in the best of causes, and given an impulse to their activity. They have arisen from the golden dreams of pleasure and promotion, to the dignity of the saint indeed. Their temporal sorrows have awakened their spiritual energies. They have lost the blessings of a family, but have from that moment adopted, under that sacred name, the whole community of mankind. Let ridicule be abashed before the majesty of such characters!
The reasons for being single can be countless and often justifiable. Plus, look at how much this situation has changed! Many of these remarkable women have made a real impact by doing good! They’ve turned life’s challenges into opportunities for growth. Instead of letting their disappointments hold them back, they’ve channeled that energy into their passions, becoming truly inspiring figures. Their personal struggles have sparked their spiritual drive. They may have missed out on family life, but they have embraced the entire human community as their family. Let anyone who mocks step back in awe of such incredible individuals!
The excellent woman in question seems to have partaken much of the spirit which pervaded the church at Jerusalem in these times of primitive simplicity and zeal, when all temporal considerations appear to have been overwhelmed by the hope of eternal blessedness. "And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul; neither said any of them that aught of the things which be possessed was his own; but they had all things in common.... Neither was there any among them that lacked; for as many as were possessors of lands or houses, sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold, and laid them down at the apostles' feet; and distribution was made unto every man, according as he had need."
The remarkable woman in question seems to embody much of the spirit that filled the church in Jerusalem during those early days of simplicity and passion, when all earthly concerns seemed to be overshadowed by the hope of eternal happiness. "And the multitude of those who believed were of one heart and one soul; none of them claimed that anything they owned was their own; but they shared everything in common.... There were no needy people among them; for those who owned land or houses sold them, brought the proceeds of the sales, and laid them at the apostles' feet; and distribution was made to each person, according to their needs."
Although this community of goods is not to be regarded as an absolute precedent for our imitation, considering that it is impracticable in all cases, was chiefly restricted to one Christian society in a very peculiar situation, and is never enjoined upon others; yet, no duty is more expressly commanded, or more solemnly inculcated in Scripture, than that of liberality to the poor. In the enactments of Moses it is vigorously enforced, it is urged by the prophets and apostles; and represented by Christ himself as an evidence of the highest perfection of character; "If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor." In those passages where a summary of religion is presented by an enumeration of its most important points, this virtue is distinctly mentioned. It is stated as an invariable characteristic of the most eminent saints, as Abraham, Job, and others; it is often called righteousness, is represented as a fulfilment of the divine law, or the best expression of our love to God; and while tremendous judgments are threatened to those who disregard this sacred duty, the most ample rewards are promised to the pious benefactors of mankind. "Blessed," said Christ, "are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy." "To do good and communicate forget not, for with such sacrifices God is well pleased." Such persons are described as "making themselves bags which wax not old, a treasure in the heavens that faileth not"--as "making themselves friends of the mammon of unrighteousness, that when they fail, they may he received into everlasting habitations"--and as "laying up in store for themselves a good foundation against the time to come, that they may lay hold on eternal life." The equitable decisions of the last day are to be founded upon a reference to these principles, as the basis of that sentence which will irreversibly fix our destinies. "When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory: And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats: And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left. Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For I was an hungered, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink; I was a stranger, and ye took me in: naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me. Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungered, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink? When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee? Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee? And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me. Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels: For I was an hungered, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not. Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungered, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee? Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me. And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteousness into life eternal."
Although this community of goods shouldn't be seen as a strict example for us to follow—since it’s impractical in many cases, was mainly limited to one Christian community in a very unique situation, and isn’t mandated for others—there is no duty more clearly commanded and emphasized in Scripture than that of generosity toward the poor. It's strongly emphasized in Moses' laws, advocated by the prophets and apostles, and portrayed by Christ himself as a sign of ultimate character perfection: "If you want to be perfect, go and sell what you have and give to the poor." In passages that summarize religion by listing its key points, this virtue is notably mentioned. It’s described as a consistent trait of the greatest saints, like Abraham and Job; it’s frequently called righteousness, seen as fulfilling divine law, or the best expression of our love for God. While harsh judgments are warned for those who ignore this sacred duty, the most generous rewards are promised to those who do good for humanity. "Blessed," said Christ, "are the merciful, for they will receive mercy." "Don’t forget to do good and share, for with such sacrifices God is pleased." Such individuals are characterized as "making themselves bags that don’t wear out, a treasure in heaven that never fails"—as "making themselves friends of worldly wealth, so that when it’s gone, they can be welcomed into eternal homes"—and as "storing up a good foundation for the future, so they can obtain eternal life." The just decisions of the final day will be based on these principles, serving as the foundation for the judgment that will permanently determine our destinies. "When the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the holy angels with Him, He will sit on His glorious throne: All nations will be gathered before Him, and He will separate them one from another, as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. He will put the sheep on His right and the goats on His left. Then the King will say to those on His right, 'Come, you who are blessed by my Father; inherit the kingdom prepared for you since the foundation of the world. For I was hungry, and you gave me something to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave me something to drink; I was a stranger, and you invited me in; I needed clothes, and you clothed me; I was sick, and you looked after me; I was in prison, and you came to visit me.' Then the righteous will answer Him, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?' The King will reply, 'Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.' Then He will say to those on His left, 'Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels: For I was hungry, and you gave me nothing to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave me nothing to drink; I was a stranger, and you did not invite me in; I needed clothes, and you did not clothe me; I was sick and in prison, and you did not look after me.' They will also answer, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?' He will reply, 'Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.' Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life."
The history of Dorcas is very instructive as to the genuine character of charity, and the best mode of distribution. It teaches us not only to cultivate this heavenly temper, but in what manner it may become most useful. We have here, indeed, a fine and finished picture; and we cannot do better than study it closely, and copy it with all possible accuracy.
The story of Dorcas is really informative about the true nature of charity and the best ways to give. It shows us not only how to develop this noble spirit but also how it can be most effective. We have a beautiful and complete example here, and we should study it carefully and replicate it as accurately as we can.
This venerable woman was prompt and undelaying in the relief she afforded to the necessitous. She was not all promise and all tardiness, quick to feel but slow to succour. It is not uncommon for the most parsimonious persons to be liberal in good words, and to superadd the pang of disappointment to the already almost insupportable sufferings of the destitute. What is the language of commiseration unaccompanied with substantial assistance, but a drop of burning caustic poured into the wounded heart, instead of a healing cordial? To listen to the tale of wo, and to solicit by apparent kindness its minute and tragical details, only to mock expectation by professed incapacity, is the very perfection of cruelty, the forfeiture of a solemn pledge which is given in the very assumption of a listening attitude, and highly dishonourable; for we have no right to know the history of distress, if we feel indisposed to relieve it. "If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food, and one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled, notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit?"
This respected woman was quick and prompt in helping those in need. She didn't just make promises and delay action; she felt compassion and acted to support others. It's common for the stingiest people to offer kind words but add disappointment to the already unbearable suffering of the needy. What is the point of expressing sympathy without providing real help, if not like pouring burning acid into a wounded heart instead of offering a healing drink? To listen to someone’s sad story, asking for all the painful details just to end up mocking their hopes with unfulfilled promises, is the height of cruelty, breaking a serious promise that comes with simply being attentive, and it's highly dishonorable; we have no right to know about someone’s suffering if we aren't willing to help. "If a brother or sister is naked and lacks daily food, and one of you says to them, ‘Go in peace, be warmed and filled,’ yet doesn't give them what they need for their body, what good is that?"
There is a posthumous charity which often purchases to the dispenser considerable reputation when he little deserves it, and which is utterly vain to him who is inevitably beyond the reach of human applause or censure. If the charity of Dorcas had been of this questionable nature, we should not have read of the widows that stood Weeping by her death-bed, and exhibiting the various articles of clothing she made "while she was with them." Assured that life was the proper time of action, and that opportunities of usefulness could never be recalled, she "did with her might whatever her hands found to do." It is deplorable to see the numbers who, while possessing ample means and rich opportunities of feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, and visiting the sick, consume their lives in forming their plans, or proclaiming their intentions. They are indeed great benefactors in their wills, and with unsparing liberality distribute their wealth, when they can no longer keep it. They were bountiful, only because they were mortal; and notwithstanding the misplaced commendations of their survivors, bestow reluctantly what death extorts. Dorcas was "full of good works and alms-deeds which she DID." A person, with whom the writer is acquainted, had specified a large sum in his will to be appropriated to the purpose of erecting convenient alms-houses for the poor; but bethinking himself of the possibility that his life might be extended to a distant period, and that in the meantime the poor would continue to buffer, and many of them perish without the projected aid, he became the instant executor of his own will, and lived for years to be a gratified witness of that comfort which must otherwise have been so long delayed. It is descriptive of the "good man," that "he HATH dispersed, he HATH given to the poor."
There’s a kind of charity that often gives the giver a lot of recognition when they don’t really deserve it, and it’s completely pointless to someone who is beyond the reach of human praise or criticism. If Dorcas’s charity had been of this questionable kind, we wouldn’t have read about the widows who stood weeping by her deathbed, showcasing the different pieces of clothing she made "while she was with them." She knew that life was the right time for action, and that chances to help others would never come again, so she "did with her might whatever her hands found to do." It’s sad to see so many people who, while having plenty of resources and great chances to feed the hungry, clothe the naked, and visit the sick, waste their lives planning or talking about their intentions. They’re really generous in their wills, sharing their wealth after they can no longer use it. They were only giving because they were mortal, and despite the misplaced praise from those left behind, they give reluctantly what death forces them to. Dorcas was "full of good works and alms-deeds which she DID." A person I know had set aside a large amount in his will to build nice homes for the poor; but realizing that he might live for a long time and that in the meantime the needy would continue to suffer, many of them dying without the help he planned, he immediately acted on his own will, and spent years witnessing the comfort he would have otherwise delayed. It describes the "good man" that "he HATH dispersed, he HATH given to the poor."
Another feature in the beautiful portrait of female excellence before us, is the abundance and variety of her charities. Dorcas is represented as. "full of good works and alms-deeds?" and though I the coats and garments which she gave to the widows are only mentioned, they are to be considered as one specimen only of a very extended system of benevolence. She was neither capricious, nor merely occasional in her bounty; but "glorified the Father, by bearing much fruit."
Another aspect of the beautiful portrait of female excellence in front of us is the abundance and variety of her charitable acts. Dorcas is portrayed as "full of good works and acts of kindness," and while the coats and garments she gave to the widows are the only ones mentioned, they represent just one example of a much larger system of generosity. She wasn't unpredictable or just sporadic in her giving; instead, she "glorified the Father by bearing much fruit."
Some persons are the mere creatures of impulse. When affected by any violently exciting cause, they start into momentary vigour, and by a kind of convulsive effort resist the inwrought habit of their minds, but instantly relapse into greater insensibility. If a necessitous case be presented to their attention under deeply afflicting circumstances, with powerful recommendations, especially from those whom they are solicitous of pleasing, or with whom they expect to be enrolled in the popular and widely circulated list of donations, they may at times he found "willing to communicate," but even then never attain the noble pre-eminence of "a cheerful giver." It would have pleased them, however, to have remained unasked; and if by any petty artifice they could have evaded the application, they would most readily have adopted it, provided they could have saved their reputation as well as their pence.
Some people are just driven by impulse. When something really exciting happens, they quickly get energized and, through a kind of frantic effort, push against their usual habits, but they soon slip back into apathy. If they encounter a pressing situation presented in a very emotional way, especially with strong suggestions from people they want to impress or with whom they hope to be seen positively in well-known donation lists, they might sometimes be found "willing to help," but even then, they never reach the lofty status of being "a cheerful giver." They would have preferred to be asked for help rather than to have to offer it, and if they could find some sneaky way to avoid the request while still keeping their good name and saving some money, they would gladly take it.
You may sometimes meet with persons who are indeed charitable, but their charity is sectarian. They do good within certain limits, but never take a wider range; and if they do not "forbid" others, who "follow not with them," they afford no encouragement to their exertions. They have chosen a particular spot to cultivate, and beyond the encircling fence which bigotry has marked out, they cannot he persuaded to impart even a drop of refreshing supply. What they do seems, in some measure, an apology for what they omit; but what they omit detracts from the value of what they do. They are not "FULL of good works."
You might occasionally come across people who are genuinely charitable, but their charity is limited to their own group. They do good within certain boundaries, but they never expand their efforts. Even if they don't actively stop others who don't align with them, they don't really support those people's efforts. They've chosen a specific area to focus on, and beyond the barriers that their narrow-mindedness has created, they can't be convinced to share even a little help. What they do seems like a way to excuse what they don't do, and their omissions lessen the value of their actions. They're not "FULL of good works."
Others have certain stated charities; and though they have passed the narrow boundary of party prejudice, have made no provision in their plans for cases of singular and sudden calamity. Their charity walks in particular districts, and cannot go a step out of the beaten track. They have allotted a certain portion of their income to the regular calls of necessity, which cannot be exceeded, and have a specified circle of objects which cannot be changed; and, if one may judge by their comparative callousness to all other claims, it would be natural to infer that they had taken a certain quantum sufficit from their stock of sensibility, which bore an invariable proportion to their calculations. In vain you plead for the most urgent distress, in vain you solicit the smallest contribution; they have no sympathies left; and, beyond u certain sphere, they are relentless, impenetrable, and cruel.
Others have specific charities they support; and while they have moved beyond strict party biases, they haven't made any plans for unexpected and unique disasters. Their charity is limited to certain areas and doesn't extend beyond the usual path. They've set aside a specific portion of their income for regular needs, which they won't exceed, and have a defined group of recipients that cannot be changed; judging by their indifference to all other requests, it seems they've exhausted a certain quantum sufficit of sensitivity, which remains proportional to their calculations. You can plead for the most urgent needs or request even a small donation in vain; they have no compassion left; outside their limited sphere, they are unyielding, unreachable, and harsh.
In proportion as charity is methodical, it is apt to become cold; and though we cannot plead for that diffusiveness which is bounded by no prescribed limits, regulated by no order, or influenced by no preferences, yet care should be taken lest it suffer by restriction. If this holy fire be too much confined, it will be in danger of extinction.
As charity becomes more systematic, it tends to grow cold. While we can't argue for the kind of generosity that has no boundaries, follows no rules, or is swayed by personal preferences, we must also be careful not to limit it too much. If this holy fire is overly restricted, it risks going out.
Another and a pleasing peculiarity in the benevolence of Dorcas, is, that, so far as appears from her brief history, her benefactions were personally bestowed. She is represented as making the garments given to the poor widows herself; and doubtless to ascertain what they wanted, and the proportion of their respective necessities, she was in the habit of visiting their habitations, for the purposes of inquiry and inspection. These visits, besides, would afford favourable opportunities for pious conversation. How often she wept over their sorrows--what words of peace and consolation she uttered--what salutary instructions she communicated--what fervent petitions she uttered, cannot indeed now be ascertained; but there is a book which has recorded them in imperishable characters, and a day approaching when they shall be disclosed and rewarded. "For we must all appear before the judgment-seat of Christ, that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad."
Another nice thing about Dorcas's kindness is that, as far as we can tell from her brief history, she personally gave her help. She is described as making the clothes she donated to the poor widows herself; and to understand what they needed and the extent of their different situations, she regularly visited their homes to ask questions and check on them. These visits likely provided good opportunities for meaningful conversations. We may never know how often she cried over their troubles, what words of comfort she shared, what helpful advice she offered, or what heartfelt prayers she said, but there is a book that has recorded these in lasting words, and a day is coming when they will be revealed and rewarded. "For we must all appear before the judgment-seat of Christ, that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad."
It would be easy to specify many reasons why the charitable should visit the poor. Independently of the inferiority of the impression which is produced on the mind by the mere recital of the sufferings of others, it is scarcely possible to obtain correct information respecting their actual and diversified necessities, without repairing to their cottages. The most faithful narrator will not deem it necessary or proper to enter into certain particulars, which the vigilant eye of sympathizing benevolence would at once discover, and the heart of pity must deeply feel. Owing to the different effects which the same distress produces on persons whose natural constitutions are dissimilar, it may often happen that the most afflicting part of their condition is overlooked; and the prompt assistance which would otherwise be afforded, is lost through some omission or unintentional misstatement. "To visit the fatherless and the widows in their affliction," is no less represented by an apostle as constituting the best exemplification of "pure religion," than "to keep himself unspotted from the world;" and in the transactions of the final judgment, the supreme Arbiter is described as noticing with peculiar approbation, as even making the very determining point of his people's character and destiny, their visiting the sick and those in a state of imprisonment, in order to supply them with the necessaries or comforts of existence.
It would be easy to list many reasons why those who are charitable should visit the poor. Aside from the weaker impact of just hearing about the suffering of others, it’s nearly impossible to get accurate information about their actual and varied needs without going to their homes. Even the most honest storyteller might not think it's necessary or appropriate to include certain details that the observant eye of compassionate kindness would immediately notice, and that a caring heart would profoundly feel. Because different people react differently to the same distress based on their individual nature, it's often the case that the most painful aspects of their situation are missed; as a result, the immediate help that could have been provided is lost due to some oversight or unintentional inaccuracy. "Visiting orphans and widows in their distress" is depicted by an apostle as the best example of "pure religion," alongside "keeping oneself unblemished by the world." In the description of the final judgment, the highest Judge is shown to pay special attention to the acts of his followers visiting the sick and those in prison, as a determining factor in their character and fate, to provide them with the essentials or comforts of life.
Ladies are respectfully urged to these labours of love, from the consideration that they possess the most leisure and the best opportunities of doing them. It would prove a wise and pleasurable mode of employing some of the intervals of domestic engagement, and furnish both useful and interesting subjects of reflection to fill up the vacuities of thought. But if the multiplicity of their concerns furnish some plausible excuse for, at least, a less constant and busy attention to the wants of poverty; single ladies, on whom the cares of a family have not yet devolved, should feel it their duty, and will ever find it their privilege, to be thus devoted to the cause of suffering humanity. Their time is their own, their property at their command. They are responsible alone to God and their own consciences; and by these services to the community are every day and hour giving a practical and unanswerable reply to the scoffings of an illiberal world. How much better are these visits of mercy than visits of ceremony, in which useless hours are squandered away amidst the butterflies of fashion, insufferable fatigue is sustained, scandal circulated, and religion outraged! Sweet and refreshing is the sleep of active benevolence: it knows no tossings, is visited by no bitter compunctions or terrific visions; it is cradled in innocence, lulled to rest by the music of gratitude, and guarded by the sleepless eye of Providence.
Ladies are encouraged to engage in these meaningful tasks because they have the most free time and the best opportunities to do so. It would be a smart and enjoyable way to use some of the free moments they have between household responsibilities and would provide valuable and interesting topics to think about. However, if their many obligations offer some reasonable excuse for not being consistently attentive to the needs of those in poverty, single women, who do not yet have family responsibilities, should see it as their duty—and will always find it a privilege—to dedicate themselves to helping those who are suffering. Their time is theirs, their resources are at their disposal. They are only accountable to God and their own conscience; by contributing to the community, they consistently give a strong and undeniable answer to the criticisms of a narrow-minded world. How much better are these acts of kindness than social visits that waste time on superficial matters, where useless hours are lost among the trends of fashion, exhausting conversations are endured, gossip is spread, and faith is disrespected! The peaceful sleep that comes from active kindness is sweet and refreshing: it is free from restlessness, haunted by no regrets or frightening thoughts; it is cradled in purity, lulled to rest by the appreciation of others, and protected by the watchful eye of Providence.
The habit of visiting the abodes of misery is an important means of improving our sympathies. They will become less sickly and less capricious. Those who have only wept over fictitious sorrow, will learn to shed tears of real feeling at the sight of real grief; and will gradually associate the idea of doing good with the strong emotions of a genuine liberality. It is of importance for our own sakes, as well as for the welfare of others, that sentiments of this kind should fill the mind, and that the fine edge of sensibility should never be blunted. Some, it is true, are very little solicitous for the improvement of any of their faculties; but let them remember that the faculty which is not improved, usually and almost necessarily suffers deterioration; and that he who does not warm and expand into benevolence, is likely to contract into contemptible selfishness.
The habit of visiting places of hardship is an important way to enhance our empathy. Our compassion will become less superficial and less unpredictable. Those who have only felt sorrow for made-up stories will learn to cry genuine tears when faced with real pain; and will gradually link the idea of helping others with the deep feelings of true generosity. It’s essential for our own well-being, as well as for the welfare of others, that such sentiments fill our minds, and that our sensitivity never dulls. Some people, it is true, don’t care much about improving their abilities; but they should remember that any ability that isn’t nurtured typically declines; and that a person who doesn’t grow into kindness is likely to shrink into pitiful selfishness.
Mere pecuniary aid, or indeed any other form of donation, is after all a cheap description of charity. The most avaricious persons may sometimes. resort to annual or other stated contributions, as expedients to save trouble and to pacify conscience; and while we duly appreciate this periodical goodness, it is insufficient as the basis of a claim to philanthropy of spirit. How many in the carpeted walks of wealth will readily purchase, by this means, an exemption from the inconvenience of soiling their shoes, or hurting their delicacy, by going to witness scenes of real distress.
Simply giving money, or any other type of donation, is really just a shallow form of charity. Even the most greedy people might make regular contributions just to avoid hassle and ease their conscience; while we do recognize this regular generosity, it isn't enough to prove a genuine philanthropic spirit. How many wealthy people will gladly pay to avoid the discomfort of getting their shoes dirty or facing the harsh realities of true suffering?
Ladies of opulence or of leisure should reflect further, that in paying an occasional visit to the dwellings of poverty and suffering, they are not only likely to discover many cases of silent, unobtrusive wretchedness, which but for their personal inquiries and researches might sink into the grave without the smallest relief, while clamorous wo sometimes gains the ear of the most thoughtless passenger, but they become the means of imparting a twofold blessing. In addition to what they give, the sense of their sympathy enhances the favour, and it is received with double pleasure. Man is possessed of a social principle, which operates with peculiar energy in cases of affliction. As a consciousness of neglect excites disgust and resentment, so a conviction of being the object of solicitude and sympathy produces the most grateful emotions. It may, therefore be safely asserted, that a donation to the poor, when personally bestowed by the donor, is, in consequence of the effect produced on the mind of the sufferer, of incalculably greater importance and use than the same or even a superior sum contributed by the cold agency of some unfeeling distributor. Besides, a charitable soul has a perpetual feast. Who can remain an unaffected spectator of the tearful eye--the speaking look--the thankful smile? The very silence which an overwhelming sense of kindness imposes, is more delightful to a benevolent spirit than dainties to the taste or music to the ear.
Wealthy or leisurely women should think more deeply about the impact of occasionally visiting places of poverty and suffering. They are likely to encounter many cases of quiet misery that might go unnoticed and unrelieved if not for their personal inquiries and efforts, while loud cries for help often reach even the most indifferent passerby. Their visits bring a twofold blessing. Besides their contributions, the feeling of being cared for increases the value of what they offer, and it's received with even more gratitude. Humans have a natural social instinct that particularly resonates during times of hardship. Just as feelings of neglect can create distaste and anger, knowing that others care about them brings about the most heartfelt gratitude. It can therefore be confidently stated that a gift to the poor, when given personally by the donor, has a significantly greater impact on the sufferer's mind than the same or even a larger amount given through an unfeeling distributor. Moreover, a kind-hearted person experiences a constant joy. Who can remain untouched by a tearful eye, a meaningful glance, or a grateful smile? The very silence that follows an overwhelming act of kindness is more satisfying to a generous spirit than delicacies are to the palate or music is to the ears.
In dispensing charity, many valuable acquisitions may be gained. It is, in fact, a profitable service; and he makes an excellent exchange indeed, who, while bestowing money or goods to assist the poor, obtains substantial instruction. Here then, in the meanest hovel, in the most shattered and weather-beaten shed, amidst cries of distress and sights of sorrow, the wisest may gain knowledge. What a lesson of gratitude is taught in every scene and circumstance! Who maketh thee to differ from another in point of temporal possession, mental superiority, or religious distinction? What hast thou, that thou hast not received? That humble cottager is human, like thyself! That nest of callowness and weakness contains the same species with thyself, on whom Providence has bestowed wings to soar to heights of prosperity and enjoyment. Thou art descended from the same common Father, and art heir of the same common dust! Thy life is no less precarious, if it be less wretched, than that which animates a meaner clay, and breathes in a less decorated exterior! If the one be porcelain, and the other earthen ware, both are brittle! "God hath made of one blood all nations of men." Sometimes a cottage furnishes an impressive lesson respecting the independence of happiness upon external circumstances. It teaches the salutary truth, that it is in the power of religion to impart substantial felicity in every condition, to communicate exalted enjoyment, to form an ennobled character in the meanest habitation, and to inspire the sublime sentiment of the poet:
In giving to charity, you can gain a lot of valuable insights. It's truly a rewarding act; it's a great trade when, by donating money or goods to help those in need, you learn important lessons in return. Here, even in the simplest home or the most beaten-down shed, surrounded by cries for help and sights of sorrow, the wisest people can gain knowledge. Every situation teaches a lesson of gratitude! Who makes you better than anyone else when it comes to wealth, intelligence, or faith? What do you have that you haven’t received? That humble villager is just as human as you are! That person, filled with fragility and vulnerability, belongs to the same species as you, someone whom Providence has allowed to rise to heights of prosperity and joy. You both come from the same common Father and are made from the same common dust! Your life is just as fragile, even if it's not as miserable, as that of someone living in a simpler situation with less glamorous surroundings! Whether it's fancy porcelain or plain earthenware, both can break! "God has made of one blood all nations of men." Sometimes a small cottage provides a powerful lesson about the independence of happiness from external circumstances. It teaches the valuable truth that religion can bring true happiness in any condition, provide deep enjoyment, build a noble character even in the humblest home, and inspire the uplifting sentiment of the poet:
"Give what thou wilt, without thee I am poor,
And with thee rich, take what thou wilt away."
"Give what you want, without you I am poor,
And with you I am rich, take what you want away."
COWPER.
COWPER.
Poverty has been the lot of the most distinguished of the human species; and if ever the vanity of riches, and the incurable emptiness of temporal splendour are felt, surely it must be when visiting the dwellings of the pious poor. No riches can inspire their songs of praise, or purchase a title to their immortal inheritance. No rank or dignity can attract the eyes of those holy spirits that hover round the spot to which affliction has confined an outcast Lazarus, or kindle such rapturous sensations and holy congratulations, as they manifest at the repentance of a sinner. Piety hallows the dwelling which it inhabits, and felicitates as well as sanctifies the heart, the family, and the city which it pervades. In the primitive ages of Christianity, the disciples of our Lord could see the rapacious oppressor seize the last portion of their worldly goods, and "take it joyfully;" they could "most gladly glory in their infirmities, that the power of Christ might rest upon them;" they could hail the martyr's stake, while they anticipated the martyr's crown; and, in the days of Paul and Silas, if there were a spot on earth where celestial joy took up her residence, it was, at least for one happy night, in the very dungeon of persecution.
Poverty has affected even the most distinguished members of humanity; and if there’s ever a moment to feel the emptiness of wealth and the fleeting nature of earthly grandeur, it’s surely when visiting the homes of the devout poor. No amount of riches can inspire their songs of praise or buy a place in their eternal legacy. No status or honor can catch the attention of those holy spirits that gather around the place where affliction has trapped a forsaken Lazarus, or spark the ecstatic joy and heartfelt blessings they show at the repentance of a sinner. Faith makes the place it inhabits sacred, and enriches as well as blesses the heart, family, and community it touches. In the early days of Christianity, the followers of our Lord could watch the greedy oppressor take the last of their belongings and "take it joyfully;" they could "gladly boast in their weaknesses, so that the power of Christ could rest on them;" they could greet the martyr's stake, while looking forward to the martyr's crown; and in the time of Paul and Silas, if there was ever a place on earth where heavenly joy found a home, it was, at least for one blissful night, in the very dungeon of persecution.
To return to Dorcas. Her character is so described, as to imply that hers were free, and often unsolicited charities. She did not indolently wait for applications, or contrive a thousand delays, while misery was pining into the grave; but, like her Divine Master, "went about doing good." She penetrated the obscurest retreats, not waiting to be pressed and urged to afford a trifling relief; but her benevolence resembled the course of the sun, which pours its beneficent radiance upon the earth with undistinguishing liberality. It ought not to be forgotten, that sometimes minds of the most delicate constitution are involved in all the miseries of poverty, and placed in a situation of all others the most painful, that of persons reduced from former competency and comfort. The privations of life are far more sensibly felt by those who have once known plenteousness. To them the wind of adversity blows with tenfold keenness, and the crust of want seems peculiarly unpalatable. They are reluctant, not to say "ashamed, to beg." The blushes of an instinctive sensibility suffuse their countenances, and petitions for assistance falter on their tongues. They have to contend not only with the afflictions of poverty, but with all the timidity which a consciousness of degradation superinduces. In many cases of this description, persons of eminent worth have been found, who could not overcome their scruples, till absolute want forced them abroad to suffer the rebuffs of an unfeeling world, or to gain the scanty pittance which mere importunity extorted from reluctant opulence. Dorcas is celebrated for having particularly selected such a class of sufferers. She had sought out the widows, who had lost their dearest relatives, by whose daily and cheerful labours they were perhaps enabled to live in decent sufficiency, or by whose sympathizing tenderness they were at least consoled amidst inevitable sorrows. The weakness of their sex, or the infirmities of their advanced age, prevented their contending with the storms of life; and, no doubt, many of them surrounded by a numerous family, at the decease of the beloved of their hearts, were left to struggle with accumulated difficulties.
To go back to Dorcas. Her character is portrayed in a way that suggests she offered generous and often unrequested assistance. She didn’t idly wait for people to ask for help, or create reasons to delay while others suffered; instead, like her Divine Master, she "went about doing good." She ventured into the darkest places, not waiting to be pushed or encouraged to provide a little support; her kindness was like the sun, which shines down generously on the earth without discrimination. It should not be overlooked that sometimes individuals with the most sensitive nature are caught in the depths of poverty, facing one of the most painful situations: those who have fallen from a place of comfort and stability. The hardships of life are felt much more intensely by those who once experienced abundance. For them, the winds of hardship blow with sharper intensity, and the sting of lack hits particularly hard. They feel hesitant, even "ashamed, to ask for help." The flush of an innate sensitivity colors their faces, and requests for aid stumble on their lips. They not only have to deal with the struggles of poverty, but also with the shyness that comes from feeling degraded. In many cases like this, individuals of great worth have found it difficult to overcome their hesitations until sheer necessity pushed them out to face the indifference of the world, or to scrape together the meager support that sheer persistence could wring from reluctant wealth. Dorcas is known for focusing on this specific group of sufferers. She sought out the widows, who had lost their closest relatives, whose daily cheerful efforts had perhaps allowed them to live comfortably, or whose caring presence had at least provided solace amid inevitable grief. The fragility of their gender or the limitations of their old age prevented them from withstanding life’s challenges; undoubtedly, many of them, surrounded by a large family, found themselves struggling with increased hardships after losing their beloved.
Women on whom Providence has bestowed a sufficiency, might here find ample means of usefulness among persons of their own sex. A helping hand might rescue many a widow from the deep waters of overwhelming grief: a trifling sum would in many cases prove an inestimable boon; and a very small expense of time and trouble might produce the most valuable results. A well-constructed system of benevolence resembles a fine adjustment of mechanism: by a gentle force or a moderate supply, judiciously applied, the whole machinery is kept in motion, and the greatest burdens are removed.
Women who have been fortunate enough to have what they need could find plenty of ways to help others in their community. A simple act of kindness could lift a widow out of her deep sorrow: even a small amount of money could make a huge difference in many situations; and with just a little time and effort, significant positive outcomes can be achieved. A well-organized system of charity functions like a well-tuned machine: with a light touch or a reasonable contribution, applied wisely, the entire system keeps running smoothly, and the heaviest burdens can be eased.
This leads us to remark another characteristic feature in the charity of Dorcas. It was wise and prudential. She had a plan which was not only unexceptionable, but singularly excellent and worthy of imitation. This consisted in furnishing the poor with substantial assistance, and providing for the proper application of her aid to their real and most pressing necessities. She made "coats and garments" for widows. It is to be feared, that the good intentions of persons charitably disposed are often frustrated by the improper manner in which they render assistance to the poor. They fulfil the impulse of a benevolent spirit by sending or giving their money, leaving the mode of its expenditure to their own judgment. But it is notorious, that such as are in reduced circumstances, and who feel the particular pressure of the moment which they are most anxious to relieve, have very little sense of the real value of money and of the propriety of providing against the difficulties of futurity. They take the cordial to-day, draining out every drop, forgetting that the phial will be empty to-morrow. In consequence of this extreme improvidence and inconsideration, the pecuniary help they receive frequently does little good, and fails of all the purposes which a pious charity intended.
This brings us to another important aspect of Dorcas's charity. It was smart and thoughtful. She had a plan that was not only sound but also exceptionally good and worth following. This involved providing the poor with real help and ensuring that her support met their genuine and urgent needs. She made "coats and garments" for widows. Unfortunately, it's often the case that the good intentions of charitable people are undermined by how they choose to help the poor. They act on the impulse of kindness by giving money or items, leaving it to others to decide how to use those resources. But it’s well-known that those in difficult situations, who are feeling the immediate pressure they want to alleviate, often have little understanding of the true value of money or the importance of preparing for future challenges. They use whatever help they get right away, consuming everything without thinking that soon enough, there will be nothing left. Because of this extreme lack of foresight and carelessness, the financial help they receive often does little good and fails to achieve the aims of true charitable giving.
The depravity of mankind, which must be expected to operate in the poor as well as in the rich, is another occasion of the misuse of benevolent aid. The friendly supply is consumed upon their lusts. Abandoned in character and selfish in principle, many heads of poor families addict themselves to bad company, despoiling their families of their earnings and of charitable supplies, and stupifying their consciences in the cup of intoxication. The discovery of such a misapplication ought not to extinguish the feeling of sympathy, but rather excite it afresh; both because the individuals themselves are to be doubly pitied for their destitution of moral feeling and want of religion, as well as of necessary subsistence, and because their outraged families demand renewed attention. It ought also to render liberal persons particularly watchful of the use which is made of their benefactions. It should not shut the heart, but regulate the course of feeling. The sin of others does not exempt us from the duty of contributing to the alleviation of their miseries, though it ought to induce us to study the best expedients for counteracting it. It is in fact quite as requisite that we should see to the application of what is given as to give, in all cases where this is possible or convenient. Dorcas appears to have adopted the useful plan of expending the money which she appropriated to the poor widows, for them; partly because she was probably better able to judge of the most useful mode of assisting them, and partly because the very same sum would prove doubly efficient in consequence of the savings which would acrue from working with her own hands.
The depravity of humanity, which can be seen in both the poor and the rich, is another reason for the misuse of charitable help. The generous assistance often gets spent on their own desires. Many heads of poor families, lacking character and being selfish, associate with the wrong people, wasting their earnings and charitable support, and numbing their consciences with alcohol. Discovering such misuses should not dampen our sense of sympathy but should actually renew it; we should feel doubly sorry for these individuals who lack moral values and religion, as well as basic necessities, and we should also be mindful of the suffering families affected by their actions. This should make generous donors more vigilant about how their contributions are used. It shouldn't close off our hearts but should direct our compassion. The wrongdoing of others doesn't free us from the responsibility to help relieve their suffering, though it should push us to find better ways to address it. It's just as important that we ensure the aid we give is used wisely as it is to give, whenever possible. Dorcas seems to have adopted the practical approach of using the money she set aside for poor widows, for them; partly because she likely knew better how to assist them effectively, and partly because the same amount could be more impactful due to the savings generated from her own labor.
The pretences by which men excuse themselves from giving to the poor are stated, and satisfactorily answered, by Dr. Paley, [43] in the following words: "1. 'That they have nothing to spare,' i.e. nothing for which they have not provided some other use: nothing which their plan or expense, together with the savings they have resolved to lay by, will not exhaust: never reflecting whether it be in their power, or that it is their duty, to retrench their expenses, and contract their plan, 'that they may give to them that need: or rather that this ought to have been part of their plan originally.
The excuses men make to avoid helping the poor are outlined and effectively addressed by Dr. Paley, [43] in these words: "1. 'That they have nothing to spare,' i.e. nothing that they haven’t already allocated for some other purpose: nothing that their budget or planned expenses, along with the savings they intend to set aside, won’t completely use up: never considering whether it is within their power, or that it is their duty, to cut back on their spending and simplify their plans, 'so they can give to those in need: or rather that this should have been part of their plan from the start.
"2. 'That they have families of their own, and that charity begins at home.' The extent of this plea will be considered when we come to explain the duty of parents."
"2. 'That they have families of their own, and that charity begins at home.' We will discuss the significance of this argument when we explain the responsibilities of parents."
N. B. The explanation is, that the duties of parents comprehend "maintenance, education, and a reasonable provision for the child's happiness in respect to outward condition.... A father of a family is bound to adjust his economy with a view to these demands upon his fortune; and until a sufficiency for these ends is acquired, or in due time probably will be acquired (for in human affairs probability ought to content us,) frugality and exertions of industry are duties. He is also justified in declining expensive liberality: for, to take from those who want, to give to those who want, adds nothing to the stock of public happiness. Thus far, therefore, and no farther, the plea of 'children,' of 'large families,' charity begins at home,' &c. is an excuse for parsimony, and an answer to those who solicit our bounty. Beyond this point, as the use of riches becomes less, the desire of laying up should abate proportionably.
N. B. The explanation is that the responsibilities of parents include "support, education, and a reasonable provision for the child's happiness regarding their living conditions.... A father of a family is required to manage his finances with these needs in mind; and until he has enough for these purposes, or in due time likely will have enough (because in human affairs likelihood should be sufficient for us), being frugal and working hard are essential duties. He is also justified in avoiding unnecessary extravagance; for taking from those who are in need to give to those who are in need does not increase overall public happiness. Up to this point, and not beyond, the rationale of 'children,' 'large families,' 'charity begins at home,' etc., is simply an excuse for stinginess and a response to those who ask for our generosity. Beyond this point, as the value of wealth decreases, the desire to save should also proportionately lessen.
"3. 'That charity does not consist in giving money, but in benevolence, philanthropy, love to all mankind, goodness of heart,' &c. Hear St. James: "If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food, and one of you say unto them, Depart in peace; be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit?" James ii. 15, 16.
"3. 'Charity isn’t just about giving money; it’s about kindness, philanthropy, love for all people, and having a good heart,' etc. Listen to St. James: 'If a brother or sister is naked and in need of daily food, and one of you says to them, “Go in peace; keep warm and well-fed,” yet you do not give them what they need for their bodies; what good is that?' James ii. 15, 16."
"4. 'That giving to the poor is not mentioned in St. Paul's description of charity in the thirteenth chapter of his first epistle to the Corinthians.' This is not a description of charity, but of good nature; and it is not necessary that every duty be mentioned in every place.
"4. 'The act of giving to the poor isn’t mentioned in St. Paul's description of charity in the thirteenth chapter of his first letter to the Corinthians.' This isn’t a description of charity, but rather of kindness; and it’s not required that every obligation be stated in every instance."
"5. 'That they pay the poor-rates.' They might as well allege that they pay their debts: for the poor have the same right to that portion of a man's property which the laws assign to them, that the man himself has to the remainder.
"5. 'That they pay the poor-rates.' They might as well claim that they pay their debts: because the poor have the same right to the part of a person's property that the laws set aside for them, as that person has to the rest."
"6. 'That they employ many poor persons:'--for their own sake, not the poor's;--otherwise it is a good plea.
"6. 'That they hire many poor people:'--for their own benefit, not the poor's;--otherwise it is a valid argument."
"7. 'That the poor do not suffer so much as we imagine; that education and habit have reconciled them to the evils of their condition, and make them easy under it.' Habit can never reconcile human nature to the extremities of cold, hunger, and thirst, any more than it can reconcile the hand to the touch of a red hot iron; besides, the question is not, how unhappy any one is, but how much more happy we can make him.
"7. 'The poor don’t suffer as much as we think; education and habit have made them adapt to the difficulties of their situation, allowing them to cope with it.' Habit can never make people okay with the harsh realities of cold, hunger, and thirst, just like it can't make a hand okay with touching a hot iron; besides, the real question isn’t how unhappy someone is, but how much happier we can make them."
"8. 'That these people, give them what you will, will never thank you, or think of you for it.' In the first place, this is not true; in the second place, it was not for the sake of their thanks that you relieved them.
"8. 'These people, no matter what you give them, will never thank you or think of you for it.' First of all, that's not true; and second, you didn't help them just for their gratitude."
"9. 'That we are liable to be imposed upon.' If a due inquiry be made, our merit is the same; besides that the distress is generally real, although the cause be untruly stated. "10. 'That they should apply to their parishes.' This is not always practicable: to which we may add, that there are many requisites to a comfortable subsistence which parish relief does not supply; and that there are some, who would suffer almost as much from receiving parish relief as by the want of it; and lastly, that there are many modes of charity to which this answer does not relate at all.
"9. 'That we might be taken advantage of.' If a proper inquiry is made, our worth remains the same; moreover, the hardship is usually genuine, even though the reason might be inaccurately presented. "10. 'That they should turn to their local parishes.' This isn't always possible: we should also note that there are many essentials for a decent living that parish aid doesn't cover; and some individuals would almost feel as distressed from receiving parish support as they would from lacking it; finally, there are numerous forms of charity that this response doesn’t address at all."
"11. 'That giving money encourages idleness and vagrancy.' This is true only of injudicious and indiscriminate generosity.
"11. 'Giving money promotes laziness and homelessness.' This is only true of careless and thoughtless generosity."
"12. 'That we have too many objects of charity at home, to bestow any thing upon strangers; or that there are other charities, which are more useful, or stand in greater need.' The value of this excuse depends entirely upon the fact, whether we actually relieve those neighbouring objects, and contribute to those other charities.
"12. 'We have too many local causes to support to give anything to outsiders; or there are other charities that are more helpful or in greater need.' The validity of this excuse relies completely on the fact of whether we truly help those nearby and contribute to those other charities."
"Besides all these excuses, pride, or prudery, or delicacy, or love of ease, keep one half of the world out of the way of observing what the other half suffer."
"Aside from all these excuses, pride, modesty, sensitivity, or a desire for comfort prevent one half of the world from seeing what the other half endures."
The sentiments expressed by the profound Dr. Barrow [44] will form an appropriate conclusion to the present chapter.
The thoughts shared by the insightful Dr. Barrow [44] will serve as a fitting conclusion to this chapter.
"If we contemplate our wealth itself, we may therein descry great motives to bounty. Thus to employ our riches, is really the best use they are capable of; not only the most innocent, most worthy, most plausible; but the most safe, most pleasant, most advantageous, and consequently in all respects most prudent way of disposing of them. To keep them close, without using or enjoying them at all, is a most sottish extravagance or a strange kind of madness; a man thence affecting to be rich, quite impoverished himself, dispossesseth himself of all, and alienateth from himself his estate; his gold is no more his than when it was in the Indies, or lay hid in the mines; his corn is no more his than if it stood growing in Arabia or China; he is no more owner of his lands than he is master of Jerusalem or Grand Cairo; for what difference is there, whether distance of place or baseness of mind sever things from him? whether his own heart or another man's hand detain them from his use? whether he hath them not at all, or hath them to no purpose? whether one is a beggar out of necessity or choice? is pressed to want, or a volunteer thereto? Such an one may fancy himself rich, and others, as wise as himself, may repute him so; but so distracted persons, to themselves and to one another do seem great princes, and style themselves such; with as much reason almost he might pretend to be wise or to be good. Riches are Χρηματα things whose nature consists in usefulness; abstract that, they become nothing, things of no consideration or value; he that hath them is no more concerned in them than he that hath them not. It is the heart, and skill to use affluence of things wisely and nobly, which makes it wealth, and constitutes him rich that hath it; otherwise the chests may be crammed, and the barns stuffed full, while the man is miserably poor and beggarly; 'tis in this sense true which the wise man says, 'There is that maketh himself rich, yet hath nothing'"
"If we think about our wealth, we may see strong reasons to be generous. Using our money is truly the best way to spend it; it's not only the most innocent, worthy, and reasonable choice, but also the safest, most enjoyable, and most beneficial way to use it. Keeping it all to ourselves, without using or enjoying it at all, is quite foolish or a strange kind of madness; a person who pretends to be rich ends up making themselves poor, losing all they have, and separating themselves from their property. Their gold no longer belongs to them than when it was in the Indies or hidden in the mines; their grain is no more theirs than if it were growing in Arabia or China; they are no more the owner of their land than they are the master of Jerusalem or Cairo, because what difference does it make whether it’s distance or a lack of generosity that keeps things away from them? Whether it's their own heart or someone else's hand that denies them use of it? Whether they don’t have it at all or have it without purpose? Whether someone is a beggar out of necessity or by choice? Such a person may think of themselves as rich, and others as foolish as they are may see them that way too; but such deluded people may seem like great princes to themselves and call themselves that; with just as much reason as one might claim to be wise or good. Wealth is defined by its usefulness; if you take that away, it becomes nothing, something of no value; a person who has it is as affected by it as someone who does not. It’s the heart and the ability to use an abundance of things wisely and nobly that makes it wealth and defines the rich; otherwise, the chests might be filled, and the barns could be overflowing, while the person is miserably poor and needy; in this sense, it's true what the wise man says, 'There is that maketh himself rich, yet hath nothing'."
Lydia.
Chapter XI.
Account of Paul and his Companions meeting with Lydia by the River-side at Philippi--the Impression produced upon her Heart by the Preaching of Paul--Remarks on Conversion as exemplified in the Case of this Disciple--its Seat the Heart--its Accomplishment the Result of divine Agency--the Manner of it noticed--the Effects of a divine Influence upon the human Mind, namely, attention to the Word of God and the Ordinances of the Gospel, and affectionate Regard to the Servants of Christ--Remarks on the Paucity of real Christians--the multiplying Power of Christianity--its present State in Britain--Efforts of the Bible Society.
Account of Paul and his Companions meeting Lydia by the riverside in Philippi—the impact of Paul’s preaching on her heart—thoughts on conversion as shown in this disciple's case—its source is the heart—its achievement is the result of divine action—the way it happens is noted—the effects of divine influence on the human mind, such as attention to the Word of God and the practices of the Gospel, along with a heartfelt respect for Christ's servants—thoughts on the scarcity of true Christians—the multiplying power of Christianity—its current status in Britain—efforts of the Bible Society.
The historical part of the New Testament, called the ACTS or THE APOSTLES, contains a faithful record of the early propagation of the Gospel and the incessant exertions of the first labourers in the vineyard. They were not men who "wasted their strength in strenuous idleness," or dissipated the time of action in "laboriously doing nothing;" but were endowed with extraordinary qualifications and an inextinguishable zeal for their novel and interesting employment. They reflected the light of the Sun of Righteousness upon a dark age, and glowed with the very spirit of their ascended Lord. Remarkable effects were produced upon the moral world, notwithstanding the counteracting influence of human prejudice and opposition; and as they quitted the world, amidst the whirlwinds of persecution and in the flames of martyrdom, they dropped from their ascending chariots the mantle upon their successors in office, who "entered into their labours," and continued "with great power" to give "witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus; and great grace was upon them all."
The historical section of the New Testament, known as the ACTS or THE APOSTLES, provides an accurate account of the early spread of the Gospel and the relentless efforts of the first workers in the field. They weren't people who "wasted their strength in strenuous idleness," or spent their time "laboriously doing nothing;" rather, they were gifted with remarkable abilities and an unquenchable passion for their new and exciting mission. They brought the light of the Sun of Righteousness into a dark era and radiated the very spirit of their risen Lord. Significant changes occurred in the moral landscape, despite the opposing forces of human bias and resistance; and as they left this world, amidst the storms of persecution and the fires of martyrdom, they passed down their mantle to their successors, who "entered into their labors" and continued "with great power" to bear "witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus; and great grace was upon them all."
So wonderful are the appointments of Providence, that we find a youth who took an active part in the murder of the first martyr to the Christian cause, and afterward breathed forth an unrelenting hostility against all its adherents, selected as the chief instrument of its extension in various countries. That mighty energy which "commanded the light to shine out of darkness," as he was on a persecuting expedition to Damascus, "shined into his heart," and by a miraculous interposition not only checked him in his career, but communicated to him "the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Christ Jesus," and turned all the energies of his character into a new and most important course of exertion. He became a Christian, a preacher, an apostle, and a missionary to the Gentile world: and while by his indefatigable labours he benefitted so large a proportion of his contemporaries, by his inspired epistles he has instructed the church 'of God in every succeeding age of the world.
So incredible are the plans of Providence that we see a young man who played a major role in the murder of the first martyr for the Christian cause, and later showed relentless hostility toward all its followers, become the main instrument for spreading it in various countries. That powerful energy which “commanded the light to shine out of darkness,” while he was on a mission to persecute in Damascus, “shined into his heart,” and through a miraculous intervention not only paused his actions but also gave him “the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Christ Jesus,” redirecting all his energy into a new and crucial direction. He became a Christian, a preacher, an apostle, and a missionary to the Gentile world: and while his tireless efforts benefited many of his contemporaries, his inspired letters have educated the church of God in every age that followed.
Paul appears to have travelled over a considerable portion of Asia and part of Europe. Barnabas, and afterward Silas and Timotheus, accompanied him. In many places he suffered great personal injury, and his valuable life was repeatedly endangered. Having passed through Phrygia and the proconsular province of Asia, of which Ephesus was the capital, Paul and Silas came at length to Troas, where the former had a vision, in which he saw an inhabitant of Macedonia standing before him, and uttering this request, "Come over and help us." This impressed his mind with a conviction that he was called in providence to preach the gospel in that part of Greece; and he immediately sailed down the Aegean Sea by the island of Samothracia and the port of Neapolis, and from thence to Philippi, which was a Roman colony. [45]
Paul seems to have traveled extensively across Asia and parts of Europe. Barnabas, and later Silas and Timothy, were with him. In many places, he faced serious harm, and his life was often in danger. After passing through Phrygia and the proconsular province of Asia, with Ephesus as its capital, Paul and Silas finally arrived at Troas, where Paul had a vision. In this vision, he saw a man from Macedonia standing before him, asking, "Come over and help us." This left him convinced that he was meant to preach the gospel in that part of Greece. He then immediately sailed down the Aegean Sea, passing by the island of Samothracia and the port of Neapolis, and from there to Philippi, which was a Roman colony. [45]
In this city, whither it seems probable from the history, that Luke had accompanied them, they remained some days; and here we are introduced to the brief but instructive account of the excellent woman whose name is prefixed to this chapter.
In this city, where it seems likely from the history that Luke had joined them, they stayed for several days; and here we are introduced to the short but insightful account of the great woman whose name is mentioned at the start of this chapter.
Paul, and the companions of his missionary tour, first met with Lydia at one of the Jewish places of prayer by the river-side, which ran near the city. The Temple at Jerusalem, and previously the Tabernacle, were the appointed places for the public worship of God, in the open court of which, before the altar, the people assembled. But such as lived at a distance, or from local inconveniences could not constantly repair to the place of general association, were allowed to build Proseuchiæ, or Oratories, in one of which our Saviour continued all night in prayer. They had no covering like synagogues, but were surrounded by porticoes, to afford shelter from the inclemency of the weather, and were erected in the suburbs of a city, by the baths or near rivers, on account of the purifications so frequent with the Jews, and usually on very elevated spots of ground. The proseucha signalized by the devotions of Christ was on a mountain. Some have supposed that Isaac went out to meditate in the evening in a place of this description. These were probably the high places of ancient times, in or near which groves were planted, and which are only condemned in Scripture when appropriated to idolatrous purposes. "I am like a green olive tree," says the Psalmist, "in the house of God."
Paul and his companions on their missionary journey first met Lydia at one of the Jewish prayer spots by the river that flowed near the city. The Temple in Jerusalem, and previously the Tabernacle, were designated for public worship, where people gathered in the open court, before the altar. However, those who lived far away or couldn’t regularly make it to the main gathering place were allowed to build Proseuchiæ or Oratories, one of which our Savior spent the entire night in prayer. These didn’t have roofs like synagogues; instead, they were surrounded by porches to provide shelter from bad weather and were built on the outskirts of a city, near baths or rivers, due to the frequent purification practices of the Jews, often on elevated ground. The proseucha where Christ prayed was on a mountain. Some believe that Isaac went out to meditate in the evening at a place like this. These were likely the high places of ancient times, where groves were planted, and they are only condemned in Scripture when used for idolatry. "I am like a green olive tree," says the Psalmist, "in the house of God."
Availing themselves of the opportunity afforded by the resort of devout persons to these religious retirements, these zealous ministers of the Gospel conversed and preached to the people, who on this occasion were chiefly women. But though many were addressed, it does not appear that more than one was substantially benefitted. Her attention was excited, her heart opened, and her profession of the name of Jesus immediate and public. The several points of her character deserve particular and distinct illustration.
Taking advantage of the chance provided by the resort of devoted individuals to these religious retreats, these passionate ministers of the Gospel spoke and preached to the crowd, which was mostly made up of women. Although many were addressed, it seems that only one person was truly impacted. Her interest was sparked, her heart was opened, and she publicly professed the name of Jesus right away. The different aspects of her character deserve special and detailed attention.
Lydia is said to have been of the city of Thyatira; but whether she had removed to Philippi, or was only come for the purpose of trade, is not certain. She was one who "worshipped God," that is, one who, in distinction from the heathen around her, had learned the character of Jehovah, and was probably a Jewish proselyte. [46] Instructed in the ancient records of that extraordinary nation, which had been so many past ages the only depository of divine truth, she was expecting the predicted Messiah; and while, from the natural aversion of mankind to the humiliating doctrine of salvation through a crucified person, the greater proportion of Jews rejected him, she experienced a true conversion, not only from the principles of heathenism, but from those of Judaism, to the Gospel of Jesus Christ. A few instances of this description occur in the evangelical record to show the sovereignty and diversified operations of the grace of God.
Lydia is said to be from the city of Thyatira, but it’s unclear whether she had moved to Philippi or was just there for business. She was someone who "worshipped God," meaning she had learned about the nature of Jehovah, setting her apart from the surrounding non-believers, and was likely a Jewish convert. [46] Educated in the ancient scriptures of that remarkable nation, which for many ages had been the sole keeper of divine truth, she was anticipating the promised Messiah. While many Jews rejected him due to humanity’s natural resistance to the humbling idea of salvation through a crucified figure, she underwent a genuine conversion, turning away not only from pagan beliefs but also from Judaism, to embrace the Gospel of Jesus Christ. There are a few examples in the biblical accounts that illustrate the sovereign and varied workings of God’s grace.
That moral change, that spiritual renovation, which has been called CONVERSION, is, we are aware, and ever will be, the subject of profane ridicule amongst unbelievers. It does not indeed produce any astonishment, although it awakens extreme regret, that one of the most obvious effects resulting from the publication of the Gospel of Christ should be so unblushingly denied by this class of mankind. "The natural man discerneth not the things of the Spirit of God, because they are spiritually discerned." The scriptures themselves predict this incapacity, even in some of the most refined and intellectual of our species, to form a conception of this marvellous change; and experience evinces the truth of what they affirm, and which originates in the very nature of things. It is characteristic of human perversity to disbelieve what is imperceptible to reason or invisible to sense, and to vaunt itself upon that very infidelity as a distinctive mark of pre-eminence, which is, in fact, a proof of debasement and guilt. If a system of religion were to be so constructed as to be exempt from the ridicule of the profane, it must be itself ridiculous; because their distorted minds cannot discern the beauties of truth, and their depraved feelings will not admit her claims. To secure their approbation religion must change her character, alter her doctrines, new cast her precepts, and new modify her principles.
That moral change, that spiritual renewal, which is called CONVERSION, is, as we know, and always will be, the target of mockery from non-believers. It's not surprising, although it evokes deep regret, that one of the most obvious effects of spreading the Gospel of Christ is so blatantly denied by this group. "The natural person doesn’t understand the things of the Spirit of God because they are spiritually discerned." The scriptures themselves predict this inability, even among the most refined and educated individuals, to grasp this remarkable change; and experience confirms the truth of what they state, which stems from the very nature of things. It's a hallmark of human stubbornness to reject what cannot be understood by reason or seen by the senses, and to take pride in that very disbelief as a sign of superiority, which is, in reality, a sign of degradation and guilt. If a religion were designed to be free from mockery by the irreverent, it would have to be absurd itself; because their twisted minds cannot appreciate the beauty of truth, and their corrupt feelings will not accept its claims. To gain their approval, religion would have to change its nature, alter its doctrines, reframe its teachings, and modify its principles.
Lydia presents an interesting specimen not only of the reality but of the nature of the great work of conversion; and, however contemptible the subject may appear in the eye of a dissipated world, or to the mind of a prejudiced reader, we hesitate not to state the sentiments which necessarily arise out of the present example respecting the seat and source of this change, the agent by whom it is accomplished, and the corresponding effects produced.
Lydia provides a fascinating example not just of the reality but also of the nature of significant transformation; and, no matter how trivial the subject might seem to a hedonistic society or to someone with a biased perspective, we confidently express the thoughts that naturally stem from this case regarding the origin and cause of this change, the person responsible for it, and the resulting effects produced.
1. Our attention is, in the first place, to be directed to the seat of this spiritual renovation. It is said of Lydia, that her HEART was opened. This change, therefore, is of a moral nature, not merely circumstantial, but radical. It does not consist in assuming a new name, professing new opinions, using a new language, performing a few rites and ceremonies, or reforming a few exterior vices, These are only branches--the tree itself must be made good--the crab stock of nature must be grafted with spiritual principles, and by being planted in the garden of the Lord be brought under a heavenly culture. It is then only "the fruits of righteousness" may be anticipated, "which are to the glory and praise of God."
1. Our focus must first be on the source of this spiritual renewal. It is said of Lydia that her HEART was opened. This change is, therefore, moral in nature, not just situational but fundamental. It doesn't involve just taking on a new name, adopting new beliefs, speaking differently, performing a few rituals, or fixing a few outward faults. These are merely the branches—the core must be made right—the flawed nature must be transformed with spiritual principles, and by being planted in the Lord's garden, it must be nurtured spiritually. Only then can we expect "the fruits of righteousness," "which are for the glory and praise of God."
The disordered state of the passions is a striking evidence of human degeneracy. In consequence of this a thousand mistakes are committed, and a thousand follies practised. Each passion is fixed on a wrong object, pursues an unworthy end, and is susceptible of false impressions. Indeed, the will is totally perverted, and chooses, with obstinate resolution, whatever is erroneous and criminal; on which account men are represented in the metaphorical language of Scripture, as "loving darkness rather than light." So astonishing is the degree of this perversion, that the Supreme Good is dreaded and avoided as if he were the only evil in the universe; and, however vain the attempt, guilt is continually seeking concealment in some secret covert, some supposed security from his omniscient inspection. Captivated by deceitful appearances, human confidence is perpetually misplaced, and therefore perpetually betrayed; the siren song of pleasure soothes the unhappy captives of her bewitching charms into the bosom of destruction--the splendour of earthly distinctions dims the eye of sense, and prevents its perception of the bright realities of heaven. In fact, such has been the melancholy effect of sin upon the perceptions of the human soul, that every thing is seen through the medium of sensual passions in an inverted position--good seems evil, and evil good--and till this disorder become rectified by a divine touch, the heart will remain at enmity against God, the refuge and resort of the worst dispositions, and the great central pandemonium of every diabolical affection. Such is the statement of Jesus Christ himself, "From within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness; all these things come from within, and defile the man."
The chaotic state of our emotions is clear evidence of human decline. Because of this, countless mistakes are made and countless foolish actions are taken. Each emotion is fixated on the wrong target, chases an unworthy goal, and can easily be misled. In fact, the will is completely twisted, stubbornly choosing whatever is wrong and immoral; that's why people are described in the metaphorical language of Scripture as "loving darkness rather than light." The level of this distortion is so remarkable that the Supreme Good is feared and avoided as if He were the only evil in the universe; and, no matter how futile the effort, guilt continuously tries to hide in some secret corner, seeking a supposed safety from His all-knowing gaze. Misled by deceptive appearances, human trust is constantly misplaced and thus always betrayed; the alluring call of pleasure lulls the unfortunate victims of its enchanting pull into destruction—the allure of worldly status blinds the senses, preventing the recognition of the brilliant realities of heaven. Indeed, the sorrowful impact of sin on the human soul's perception is such that everything is viewed through the lens of distorted passions—good appears evil, and evil seems good—until this disorder is corrected by a divine touch, the heart will remain hostile toward God, becoming a refuge for the worst inclinations and the central hub of every wicked desire. This is echoed in the words of Jesus Christ himself: "From within, out of the heart of men, come evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness; all these things come from within, and defile the man."
As the intellectual and moral state of man are, in a religious view, closely connected, the renovation of the heart is essentially connected with an important change in the understanding. The latter may, indeed, be considerably improved and informed when no spiritual effect is produced upon the former, but the former cannot be renewed without corresponding and coincident effects on the latter; and the illumination of the understanding is so universal, that believers are said to be "light in the Lord." Their perceptions of truth are not mere gleamings and streaks of divine radiance thrown across the obscurity of the mind, but all is light. Nor is it merely new light diffused over objects familiar to the thoughts, but a discovery of new scenes. The soul, in a sense, changes its hemisphere, emerges from darkness, ascends to the summits of Pisgah, and contemplates the ineffable glories of a new creation. "If any man be in Christ, he is a new creature; old things are passed away, behold all things are become new." How touching and how worthy of adoption the poet's language:
As the mental and moral state of a person are closely linked from a religious perspective, the renewal of the heart is fundamentally associated with a significant change in understanding. The understanding can indeed be greatly improved and informed even if there isn’t a spiritual impact on the heart, but the heart cannot be renewed without similar and simultaneous effects on understanding; and the enlightenment of the understanding is so comprehensive that believers are described as being "light in the Lord." Their understanding of truth isn't just fleeting glimpses of divine light shining through the darkness of the mind, but rather it is all light. It's not just new light cast on familiar concepts; it reveals entirely new landscapes. The soul, in a way, shifts its perspective, steps out of darkness, rises to the heights of Pisgah, and contemplates the indescribable wonders of a new creation. "If anyone is in Christ, he is a new creature; old things have passed away; behold, all things have become new." How moving and how deserving of our embrace is the poet's expression:
"Celestial light
Shine inward, and the mind through all her powers
Irradiate; there plant eyes, all mist from thence
Purge and disperse!"
"Heavenly light
Shine within, and illuminate the mind in all her capacities
Remove and clear away all fog from there!"
MILTON.
MILTON.
The total renovation of the heart is evinced by susceptibility of conscience. This moral faculty, in an unregenerate state, is either perverted or hardened. In the former case, our obligations are not clearly discerned, or are easily dispensed with; in the latter, the most powerful appeals to love or fear are resisted. In the progress of sin to its most awful consummation, those gentle whispers which were at first noticed, and made the transgressor tremble till he sometimes let fall the forbidden fruit, are at length unheard. Every intimation is silenced by guilty merriment, which perhaps was at first forced, but soon becomes habitual. Where conscience is not lulled into total inaction, it is, in this state of character, violated with little remorse. The mind loses sight of the glory of God, its best regulating principle; it is alive to personal interests only, and discards every thing of a nobler nature. But, in the sincere and humble Christian, conscience is tender, easily offended with evil, and gradually approximating that state of susceptibly in respect to sin, in which it resembles a well-polished mirror, that shows the slightest particle of dust or damp upon its surface. Such a conscience is no less rigorous than it is tender, and repels temptation with persevering energy. It will hold no debate with the tempter; and so far from seeking to ascertain how far it may advance towards sinful compliances without contracting actual guilt, it will "abstain from all appearance of evil."
The complete transformation of the heart is shown by the sensitivity of conscience. This moral sense, when not renewed, is either distorted or hardened. In the first case, our responsibilities are unclear or easily ignored; in the second, strong appeals to love or fear are pushed away. As sin progresses toward its most terrible outcome, those gentle nudges we first noticed, which made the wrongdoer tremble and sometimes drop the forbidden thing, eventually go unheard. Every sign is drowned out by guilty laughter, which may have started as forced but soon becomes routine. Where conscience isn't completely silenced, it is often violated with little guilt. The mind loses sight of the glory of God, which is its best guiding principle; it focuses only on personal interests and rejects anything nobler. However, in a sincere and humble Christian, the conscience is sensitive, easily hurt by evil, and gradually becomes highly sensitive to sin, similar to a well-polished mirror that reveals even the tiniest speck of dust or moisture. Such a conscience is no less strict than it is sensitive, resisting temptation with determined strength. It does not negotiate with the tempter; instead of trying to figure out how far it can go toward wrongdoing without being guilty, it will "abstain from all appearance of evil."
In stating that the heart is the seat of those principles and the source of that transformation of character which is comprehended in the term conversion, it is intended to express the permanent nature of the change. It is not an opinion or an emotions resembling the morning cloud and early dew that pass away, but an abiding and deep-wrought alteration. "He which hath begun a good work in you, will carry it on until the day of Christ Jesus;" in consequence of which, "the path of the just is as the shining light that shineth more and more unto the perfect day."
In saying that the heart is the center of those principles and the source of the character transformation known as conversion, it emphasizes the lasting nature of the change. It’s not just a fleeting opinion or emotion like the morning clouds and early dew that disappear, but a deep and enduring transformation. "He who has started a good work in you will continue it until the day of Christ Jesus;" as a result, "the path of the righteous is like the shining light that shines brighter and brighter until the perfect day."
"That such improvements of character often have occurred, and are often taking place now, cannot be denied by any philosophic observer of human nature: to disregard them, or to neglect an investigation of their use, is to neglect one of the most interesting classes of facts observable amongst mankind. Who has not either heard of or witnessed the most extraordinary changes of conduct, produced through the apparent influence (to say the least) of religious motives? I say nothing here of the three thousand converted in one day at the feast of Pentecost--of the conversion of St. Paul and others mentioned in the Acts of the Apostles--because those are usually ascribed to the miraculous and extraordinary influences of the Holy Spirit in the apostolic times. But I may call your attention ttomatters of more recent occurrence. You have witnessed instances of men running eagerly the career of folly and dissipation, who have been suddenly arrested, and changed from 'lovers of pleasure' to 'lovers of God.' You have known others who have devoted themselves early to the military profession, who literally knew no fear, who have spent their lives in the pursuit of glory, who have approached the verge of life full of scars and full of honours, still panting after 'glory, honour, immortality,' but thinking nothing of 'eternal life;' till, touched by an irresistible hand, they have been transformed from good soldiers to 'good soldiers of Jesus Christ,' have buckled on 'the armour of God,' 'fought the good fight of faith,' and following 'the Captain of their salvation,' have obtained 'the victory,' and been rewarded with unfading laurels. Others again, you have known, who have been strong and high-minded, professing never to be subdued but by the force of argument, and dexterously evading an argument when it was forcible, if it were calculated to expose the sophistry of 'free-thinking,' (as it is called,) or to exhibit the reasonableness and advantages of being pious; you have seen them increase in the dexterity of unbelief, and in callousness to moral impression, year after year,
"That such character improvements have often happened, and are still happening today, can't be denied by any thoughtful observer of human nature: ignoring them or failing to investigate their significance means overlooking one of the most fascinating aspects of human behavior. Who hasn’t heard of or seen the most remarkable changes in behavior influenced (to put it mildly) by religious motivations? I'm not mentioning the three thousand converts on the day of Pentecost or the conversion of St. Paul and others noted in the Acts of the Apostles, since those are typically attributed to the miraculous and extraordinary influences of the Holy Spirit in apostolic times. However, I can point out more recent examples. You've seen men passionately pursuing a life of excess and debauchery, who have suddenly changed from being 'lovers of pleasure' to 'lovers of God.' You’ve known people who dedicated themselves to the military at a young age, who knew no fear, spent their lives chasing glory, approached the end of life covered in scars and honors, still yearning for 'glory, honor, immortality,' but giving no thought to 'eternal life;' until, touched by an undeniable force, they've been transformed from good soldiers into 'good soldiers of Jesus Christ,' put on 'the armor of God,' 'fought the good fight of faith,' and followed 'the Captain of their salvation,' obtaining 'the victory' and being rewarded with unfading laurels. Others you’ve known have been strong and proud, saying they'd only be convinced by solid arguments, skillfully avoiding a compelling argument if it threatened to expose the flaws in so-called 'free-thinking' or show the reasonableness and benefits of being pious; you’ve watched them grow more skilled in disbelief and more indifferent to moral impressions year after year."
'Gleaning the blunted shafts that have recoil'd,
Aiming them at the shield of truth again;'
'Collecting the dull arrows that have bounced back,
Pointing them at the shield of truth once more;'
and when a band of them has gone to church for the purpose of quizzing, or of staring out of countenance some preacher of rather more than usual energy and zeal, have known one of this band pierced by 'a dart from the archer,' convinced that religion is 'the one thing needful,' and though he came 'to scoff, remaining to pray.'" [47]
and when a group of them has gone to church to mock or to intimidate some preacher who is especially energetic and passionate, I've seen one of this group touched by 'a dart from the archer,' convinced that faith is 'the one thing necessary,' and even though he came 'to scoff, he ended up staying to pray.' [47]
II. The second observable circumstance in the inspired account of Lydia's conversion is, its accomplishment by divine agency. It is stated that the LORD opened her heart. The effect is not ascribed to the apostle Paul, or his illustrious coadjutors in the Christian ministry. They might speak with the tongue of angels, and hum with the zeal of seraphs; to them might be given in trust "the everlasting Gospel," which, like the apocalyptic angel, they were carrying through "the midst of heaven" to the inhabitants of the earth, "to every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people;" they might indeed possess the power not only of placing facts in the clearest light, or urging arguments in the most forcible manner, but even of working miracles; still they could not "open the heart." Indefatigable as they were in their labours, they could not command success. At this precise point human instrumentality ceases, and divine agency commences.
II. The second noticeable thing in the inspired account of Lydia's conversion is its accomplishment by divine agency. It is said that the LORD opened her heart. The result isn't credited to the apostle Paul or his remarkable companions in the Christian ministry. They might speak with the eloquence of angels and be filled with the enthusiasm of seraphs; they might be entrusted with "the everlasting Gospel," which, like the apocalyptic angel, they were bringing through "the midst of heaven" to the people of the earth, "to every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people;" they might even have the power not only to present facts clearly or argue convincingly, but also to perform miracles; still, they could not "open the heart." No matter how tireless they were in their efforts, they could not guarantee success. At this exact point, human effort ends, and divine intervention begins.
It is by no means an unfrequent effect of ministerial fidelity, to confirm the native aversion of the impenitent to the doctrines of Christ. Pride resists conviction, and fosters prejudice; and however unanswerable the statements, or fervent the appeals which may be addressed to them, the mind still remains unsubdued, the heart is still unopened. It requires the interposal of a mightier power than either reason, remonstrance, or miracle, to accomplish this wonderful transformation of character. Hosts of apostles and legions of angels would be incompetent by their own unaided exertions, to do "any thing as of themselves;" to give light to one blind eye, or to rectify one prejudiced heart.
It’s not uncommon for loyal ministers to reinforce the natural resistance of unrepentant people to the teachings of Christ. Pride fights against conviction and promotes bias; no matter how solid the arguments or passionate the appeals may be, the mind remains unyielding and the heart stays closed. It takes a stronger power than reason, warnings, or miracles to bring about this incredible change in character. Even countless apostles and many angels would be unable, on their own, to do "anything as of themselves;" to give sight to one blind eye or to change one biased heart.
Human agency, then, cannot be of itself effectual. It is the Lord who opens the ear, the eye, the conscience, the understanding, and the heart. The weapons of that spiritual warfare, in which Christian ministers are engaged, can alone "pull down strong holds, cast down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God," and "bring into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ," being "mighty through God." What would the weapon accomplish, if the hand of Almighty power were not to grasp and wield it? The experience of modern preachers, no doubt, resembles that of their apostolic predecessors in the same field of holy labour. When stout-hearted sinners have been attacked by all the force of argument, all the power of eloquence, all the fire of zeal, all the holy violence of appeal, all the tenderness of tears, and all the terrors of denunciation--and when it might have been expected that a heart of marble thus smitten must yield and break, and yet no emotion, at least no repentance, no relinquishment of sin, and no obedience to Christ has resulted--how often have they retired exclaiming, "O the impotence of human instrumentality!" But when returning to their work, desponding or deeply apprehensive, "going forth weeping, bearing precious seed," they have at length seen the rebel struck, and in a moment abashed, humbled, penitent--melted at a word--his prejudices dashed to the ground, like Lucifer from heaven--his heart opened, like that of Lydia, and the bitter stream of his enmity turned into the sweetness of Christian love--They have paused--inquired--wondered--beheld the "excellency of the power," which was "not of man, but of God;" and have retired exclaiming, "O the omnipotence of divine grace!"
Human agency, therefore, isn't effective on its own. It's the Lord who opens our ears, eyes, consciences, understanding, and hearts. The tools for the spiritual fight that Christian ministers engage in can solely "tear down strongholds, cast down imaginations, and every high thing that sets itself against the knowledge of God," and "take every thought captive to obey Christ," being "mighty through God." What would the tool achieve if it weren't held and wielded by the Almighty power? The experiences of modern preachers likely mirror those of their apostolic predecessors in the same sacred work. When determined sinners have faced the full force of reasoning, the power of eloquence, the intensity of passion, the earnestness of appeal, the tenderness of tears, and the fears from denunciation—and it might have seemed that a heart of stone would surely yield and break—but no emotion, no repentance, no letting go of sin, and no obedience to Christ has occurred—how often have they walked away exclaiming, "Oh, the powerlessness of human effort!" Yet when they return to their mission, feeling discouraged or deeply concerned, "going forth weeping, carrying precious seed," they eventually see the rebellious struck down, suddenly humbled, remorseful—softened by a word—his biases shattered, like Lucifer cast out of heaven—his heart opened, like Lydia's, and the harsh flow of his hostility transformed into the sweetness of Christian love—They have paused—questioned—wondered—witnessed the "excellency of the power," which was "not of man, but of God;" and have left exclaiming, "Oh, the all-powerful grace of God!"
It is an extraordinary circumstance, that the agency of God, in the production of the natural world, should be universally admitted, because no other adequate cause can be assigned; and yet that it should, with so little hesitation, be denied in the moral world. Why is God to be excluded from this superior creation, but because men "do not like to retain him in their knowledge," and because corrupted reason would deify itself and dethrone the Almighty?--And here we have the characteristic distinction between religion and irreligion. The former assigns God as the cause and agent in every thing, born interior and exterior to us. It places him upon the throne, subordinates every thing to his will, attributes every thing to his influence. It contemplates his dominion as infinite, and his will as the law of nature and of nations. It fully believes, that naturally and spiritually "in him we live, and move, and have our being." Irreligion--and we may comprehend in the term, not only extravagant immorality or gross impiety, but a system which is found to exist under the cloak of religion, and the pretence of doing God service--irreligion of every class and in every form is perpetually limiting the empire of the Deity, prescribing bounds to his influence, criticising and defining his prerogatives, and refusing him the "right to reign over us."
It’s remarkable that people generally accept God’s role in creating the natural world since no other reasonable explanation exists, yet they deny His involvement in the moral realm with little hesitation. Why is God pushed out of this higher creation, if not because people “don’t want to keep Him in their knowledge,” and because corrupted reasoning seeks to elevate itself and marginalize the Almighty? This highlights the key difference between religion and irreligion. The former recognizes God as the cause and agent behind everything, both internally and externally. It places Him on the throne, subjects everything to His will, and attributes all things to His influence. It views His dominion as limitless and His will as the law of nature and nations. It firmly believes that “in Him we live, and move, and have our being,” both naturally and spiritually. Irreligion—encompassing not just extreme immorality or blatant impiety, but also systems masquerading as religion while pretending to serve God—constantly seeks to restrict God’s authority, setting limits on His influence, questioning and defining His rights, and denying Him the “right to reign over us.”
The Scriptures uniformly ascribe the first principle, all the successive actions, and the final consummation of religion in the heart, to the Spirit of God. It is the subject of express promise: "And the Lord thy God will circumcise thine heart, and the heart of thy seed, to love the Lord thy God with all thine heart and with all thy soul, that thou mayest live."--"This shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel: After those days, saith the Lord, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts, and will be their God, and they shall be my people."--"A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you; and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you a heart of flesh; and I will put my Spirit within you, and cause you to walk in my statutes, and ye shall keep my judgments and do them." The nature of this moral transformation is distinctly stated in such passages as the following--"Born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God"--"Ye are not in the flesh, but in the spirit, if so be the Spirit of God dwell in you. But if any man have not the Spirit of God, he is none of his"--"As many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God"--"We are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath ordained, that we should walk in them." In the same manner, the increase of religion is ascribed to the Spirit. "He which hath begun a good work in you, will perform it unto the day of Jesus Christ"--"Now the God of peace, that brought again from the dead our Lord Jesus, that great Shepherd of the sheep, through the blood of the everlasting covenant, make you perfect in every good work to do his will, working in you that which is well pleasing in his sight, through Jesus Christ." Let us then, as Moses expresses it respecting the bush which he saw at the back of Horeb, burning, but still unconsumed, "turn aside and see this great sight." "God is every where by his power. He rolls the orbs of heaven with his hand, he fixes the earth in its place with his foot, he guides all the creatures with his eye, and refreshes them with his influence; he makes the powers of bell to shake with his terrors, and binds the devils with his word, and throws them out with his command, and sends the angels on embassies with his decrees.... God is especially present in the hearts of his people, by his Holy Spirit; and indeed the hearts of holy men are temples in the truth of things, and in type and shadow they are heaven itself. For God reigns in the hearts of his servants: there is his kingdom. The energy of grace hath subdued all his enemies; this is his power. They serve him night and day, and give him thanks and praise; that is his glory. The temple itself is the heart of man; Christ is the high priest, who from thence sends up the incense of prayers, and joins them to his own intercession, and presents all together to his Father; and the Holy Ghost, by his dwelling there, hath also consecrated it into a temple; and God dwells in our hearts by faith, and Christ by his Spirit, and the Spirit by his purities; so that we are also cabinets of the mysterious Trinity; and what is short of heaven itself, but as infancy is short of manhood, and letters of words?" [48]
The Scriptures clearly attribute the foundational principle, all subsequent actions, and the ultimate fulfillment of religion in the heart to the Spirit of God. It is the subject of a direct promise: "And the Lord your God will cleanse your heart and the hearts of your descendants, so you can love the Lord your God with all your heart and soul, so that you may live."–"This is the covenant I will establish with the house of Israel: After those days, says the Lord, I will put my law in their hearts and write it on their hearts; I will be their God, and they will be my people."–"I will also give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you; I will remove your heart of stone and give you a heart of flesh. I will put my Spirit in you and help you follow my decrees and keep my laws and do them." The nature of this moral transformation is clearly stated in passages such as: "Born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God"–"You are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if indeed the Spirit of God lives in you. If anyone does not have the Spirit of God, they do not belong to him"–"Those who are led by the Spirit of God are the children of God"–"We are his creation, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do." Similarly, the growth of religion is attributed to the Spirit: "He who began a good work in you will carry it on to completion until the day of Christ Jesus"–"Now may the God of peace, who brought up from the dead our Lord Jesus, the great Shepherd of the sheep, through the blood of the everlasting covenant, equip you with everything good for doing his will, working in you what is pleasing in his sight through Jesus Christ." So, let us, as Moses described the burning bush he saw on the back of Horeb, which was burning but not consumed, "turn aside and see this great sight." "God is everywhere by his power. He moves the celestial bodies with his hand, secures the earth in its place with his foot, guides all creatures with his eye, and refreshes them with his influence; he makes the powers of hell tremble with his terrors, restrains demons with his word, expels them with his command, and sends angels on missions with his decrees... God is especially present in the hearts of his people through his Holy Spirit; the hearts of holy people are, in truth, temples, and in type and shadow, they are heaven itself. For God reigns in the hearts of his servants: that is his kingdom. The power of grace has defeated all his enemies; this is his strength. They serve him day and night, giving him thanks and praise; that is his glory. The heart of man is the true temple; Christ is the high priest, who sends up the incense of prayers from there, combining them with his own intercession and presenting them all to his Father; and the Holy Spirit, by dwelling there, has also consecrated it into a temple; and God dwells in our hearts by faith, and Christ by his Spirit, and the Spirit by his purity; so we are also vessels of the mysterious Trinity; and what falls short of heaven itself is like how childhood falls short of adulthood, and words are just letters." [48]
How inconceivably glorious is the beauty of holiness in the renovated soul! That "God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness," should "shine into our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Christ Jesus"--that the vileness of our nature should be superseded by the purity of grace--that sinners should be pardoned and sin subdued--that the good seed should vegetate in such a barren and overgrown wilderness of desolation--that we who were "sometime darkness" should become "light in the Lord," is truly marvellous. This establishment of "the kingdom of God within us," excites the gratitude of saints, the wonder of angels, and the loud anthems of triumph that vibrate from the harps of heaven. When God made a fair world from a formless mass of matter, "the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy;" but when he devised the plan to make a holy human being from a base and fallen rebel, they sung "Glory to God in the HIGHEST."
How incredibly beautiful is the holiness in a renewed soul! That "God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness" should "shine into our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Christ Jesus"—that our sinful nature should be replaced by the purity of grace—that sinners should be forgiven and sin conquered—that good seeds should grow in such a barren and overgrown wilderness of desolation—that we who were "once darkness" should become "light in the Lord," is truly amazing. This establishment of "the kingdom of God within us" stirs the gratitude of saints, the amazement of angels, and the loud songs of triumph that resonate from the harps of heaven. When God created a beautiful world from a chaotic mass of matter, "the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy;" but when He planned to create a holy human being from a fallen rebel, they sang "Glory to God in the HIGHEST."
How animating the consideration, that the hope of salvation inspired in the soul by the Spirit of God, can never be extinguished! The grace that powerfully impels him to take the first step in the Christian life, as forcibly urges him forward to the end of his course. The light which is kindled in his bosom will burn and brighten, and consummate his immortal bliss. It is itself the pledge of this increase and perfection. The felicity of the Christian here is similar in its essence to his glory hereafter, as the first ray of morning is the same in nature with the noontide brightness. It may struggle through obscurities, but will rise to perfect day. Death indeed is rapidly approaching: but as the solar orb plunges for a short season into darkness, to reappear with new splendour; so will the righteous eventually ascend above the tomb and, the worm, to "shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father."
How uplifting is the thought that the hope of salvation, inspired in the soul by the Spirit of God, can never be extinguished! The grace that strongly drives someone to take the first step in the Christian life also powerfully urges them forward to the end of their journey. The light that is ignited in their heart will burn brightly and lead to their eternal happiness. It is itself the promise of this growth and perfection. The joy of the Christian here is similar in essence to their glory in the future, just as the first light of morning is the same in nature as the brightness of noon. It may struggle through darkness, but it will rise to a perfect day. Death is indeed approaching quickly; but just as the sun dips for a short time into darkness, only to return with renewed brilliance, so the righteous will eventually rise above the grave and, beyond decay, "shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father."
The manner of Lydia's conversion ought not to be overlooked. Her heart was opened. There is something gentle, as well as effectual, in the representation. The Spirit of God not only operates by a variety of instruments, but by a considerable diversity of modes. He descends on Sinai in tempests, and on Calvary in smiles. Sometimes his manifestations are terrible, and sometimes soothing; sometimes he breaks, and sometimes opens the heart. In scripture we are furnished with illustrations of this diversified operation. Manasseh, who "made Judah and the inhabitants of Jerusalem to err, and to do worse than the heathen," and who "would not hearken" to divine monitions, was taken by the Assyrians "among the thorns, and bound with fetters, and carried to Babylon." He who was unaffected, either by mercies or menaces, in his prosperity, "when he was in affliction, besought the Lord his God, and humbled himself greatly before the God of his fathers, and prayed unto him; and he was entreated of him and heard his supplication, and brought him again to Jerusalem into his kingdom. Then Manasseh knew that the Lord he was God." Paul, who breathed out threatening and slaughter against the Christian church, was suddenly struck to the earth by a miraculous light from heaven, and from a persecutor transformed into an apostle. The Philippian jailer exclaimed amidst his terrors, "What must I do to be saved?" and was not only prevented from committing suicide, but directed to heaven by the doctrine of his apostolic prisoner, which through grace he cordially received: "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shall be saved, and thine house." On the other hand, Samuel, Timothy, and Lydia, were "drawn with bands of love." They heard the whispers of mercy, and felt the attractions of grace. Each of their hearts, like that of Lydia, was opened. Passion subsided, prejudice withdrew, ignorance melted away. They were not taken by storm, but made willing "in the day of his power."
The way Lydia was converted shouldn't be overlooked. Her heart was opened. There's something gentle, as well as effective, in this description. The Spirit of God works through different instruments and in a variety of ways. He appears on Sinai with tempests, and on Calvary with kindness. Sometimes His manifestations are frightening, and sometimes comforting; sometimes He breaks the heart, and sometimes He opens it. Scripture gives us examples of this diverse operation. Manasseh, who "led Judah and the inhabitants of Jerusalem astray, doing worse than the pagans," and who "would not listen" to divine warnings, was captured by the Assyrians "among the thorns, bound with chains, and taken to Babylon." He, who was unaffected by either blessings or threats during his success, "when he was in trouble, sought the Lord his God, humbled himself greatly before the God of his ancestors, and prayed to Him; and He was moved by his plea and listened to him, bringing him back to Jerusalem and restoring his kingdom. Then Manasseh realized that the Lord was God." Paul, who was threatening and persecuting the Christian church, was suddenly knocked to the ground by a miraculous light from heaven, transforming from a persecutor into an apostle. The Philippian jailer cried out in fear, "What must I do to be saved?" and was not only stopped from taking his own life but was pointed to heaven by the teachings of his apostolic prisoner, which he accepted through grace: "Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved, along with your household." On the other hand, Samuel, Timothy, and Lydia were "drawn with bands of love." They heard the whispers of mercy and felt the pull of grace. Each of their hearts, like Lydia's, was opened. Passion calmed down, prejudice faded away, and ignorance disappeared. They weren't overwhelmed but were made willing "in the day of His power."
The importance of this change is intimated in the remarkable declaration of Jesus Christ to Nicodemus, "Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of heaven." It is essential to the possession of paradise; it constitutes the very basis of the Christian character; and to be indifferent to it is a mark of condemnation. Its present influence, and its future consequences, are so wonderful, that it becomes us to cherish an immediate and incessant solicitude upon the subject. Look upward--Almighty love "waits to be gracious"--Is it not recorded, and can it ever be forgotten, that "every one that asketh receiveth; and he that seeketh findeth; and to him that knocketh it shall be opened? If a son shall ask bread of any of you that is a father, will he give him a stone? or if he ask a fish, will he for a fish give him a serpent? or if he shall ask an egg, will he offer him a scorpion? If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your children, how much more shall your heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to them that ask him?"
The significance of this change is highlighted in Jesus Christ's powerful statement to Nicodemus: "Unless someone is born again, they cannot see the kingdom of heaven." It's essential for experiencing paradise; it's the foundation of the Christian faith, and being indifferent to it is a sign of condemnation. Its current effects and future implications are so amazing that we should maintain a constant and deep concern about it. Look up—Almighty love "waits to be gracious." Is it not written, and can it ever be forgotten, that "everyone who asks receives; and the one who seeks finds; and to the one who knocks, it will be opened? If a son asks for bread from any of you who is a father, will he give him a stone? Or if he asks for a fish, will he give him a snake instead of a fish? Or if he asks for an egg, will he offer him a scorpion? If you then, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to those who ask Him?"
III. The account of Lydia is further illustrative of the effects resulting from a divine influence upon the human heart.
III. Lydia's story further illustrates the effects of divine influence on the human heart.
The first of these effects is intimated by the statement, that "she attended unto the things which were spoken of Paul." Her spirit was exceedingly different from that of the hearers of Ezekiel: "Thou son of man, the children of thy people still are talking against thee by the walls and in the doors of the houses, and speak one to another, every one to his brother, saying, Come, I pray you, and hear what is the word that cometh forth from the Lord. And they come unto thee as the people cometh, and they sit before thee as my people, and they hear thy words, but they will not do them; for with their mouth they show much love, but their heart goeth after their covetousness And lo, thou art unto them as a very lovely song of one that hath a pleasant voice, and can play well on an instrument; for they hear thy words, but they do them not." Lydia, on the contrary, heard to profit. She listened, reflected, and "inwardly digested," the truths of the Gospel. She heard with seriousness and with self-application. The doctrine was to her novel and interesting. The Gospel came to her, "not in word only, but also in power, and in the Holy Ghost, and in much assurance;" for she "received the word of God which she heard, not as the word of men, but, as it is in truth, the word of God," which "effectually worketh" in believers.
The first of these effects is suggested by the statement that "she paid attention to what Paul said." Her attitude was very different from that of the listeners in Ezekiel's time: "Son of man, the people of your nation are still talking against you by the walls and in the doorways of their homes, saying to one another, 'Come, please, and listen to what the Lord has to say.' They come to you like the people come and sit before you like my people, and they hear your words, but they won't act on them; for with their mouths they show much love, but their hearts are after their greed. And look, you are to them like a beautiful song sung by someone with a lovely voice who can play well on an instrument; they hear your words, but they don't follow them." Lydia, on the other hand, listened to learn. She heard, reflected, and "internally processed" the truths of the Gospel. She listened seriously and personally. The teaching was new and interesting to her. The Gospel came to her "not just in words, but also in power, and in the Holy Spirit, and with great assurance;" for she "received the word of God that she heard, not as the word of men, but, as it truly is, the word of God," which "works effectively" in believers.
And is this descriptive of our views and feelings? Do we pay attention to divine instructions, and "hear so that our souls may live?" Is the word of God to us like descending manna from the skies, which we go forth with eager haste to gather for our spiritual subsistence? Whenever we repair to "the house of God," are we "more ready to hear, than to give the sacrifice of fools?" Do we dwell upon the lips of the preacher? Do we aim to remember, seek to understand, and humbly resolve to practise what is taught? Or, do we go to public worship with reluctant and hesitating steps, compelled alone by the force of habit, education, example, or terror? When arrived, do we enter with irreverence, assume a careless and familiar attitude, give the rein to our wandering thoughts, resign our bodies or our consciences to unhallowed slumber, or watch with frequent glances the slowly revolving hour that will free us from an irksome service? When retired from public engagements, do we forget God our Maker, dissipate consecrated hours, and at length lose every salutary impression amidst the cares of life, and the subordinate concerns of a moment?
And does this reflect our views and feelings? Do we pay attention to divine instructions and "listen so that our souls may live?" Is the word of God to us like falling manna from the heavens, which we eagerly rush to collect for our spiritual nourishment? Whenever we go to "the house of God," are we "more ready to listen than to offer the sacrifice of fools?" Do we focus on the preacher's words? Do we try to remember, seek to understand, and genuinely commit to practicing what is taught? Or do we attend public worship with hesitant and reluctant steps, driven only by habit, education, example, or fear? When we arrive, do we enter with disrespect, adopt a careless and casual attitude, let our thoughts wander, surrender our bodies or our consciences to unholy slumber, or frequently glance at the clock as we await the moment we can escape from a tedious service? When we retreat from public engagements, do we forget God our Creator, waste sacred time, and ultimately lose every beneficial impression amidst the stresses of life and the lesser matters of the moment?
It is possible you may even plead temporal anxieties and business, as an extenuation of the guilt of religious negligences, or as a sufficient ground of exemption from the claims of piety. You are forsooth too busy, too needy, too perplexed in establishing connections or conducting commercial transactions, to pay an immediate regard to the interests of the soul and eternity; and although you at present defer such considerations, you apologize for your folly by saying, it does not arise from aversion, but inconvenience. You do not deny, you only procrastinate. But who has insured your life? Who has perused for you the page of destiny, which numbers the years of your mortal existence? Who has given you any evidence, that the distant day of intentional repentance, shall be a day of health, seriousness, and leisure? Who can tell that the sun, which illumines the path of your prosperity at this period of irresolution, will not, upon the arrival of the predicted hour of penitence, shine only upon your grave? Who has given you authority to invert the order which Christ has established in the admonition, "Seek ye FIRST the kingdom of God and his righteousness?"
You might even argue that your worries and busy schedule excuse your neglect of religious duties or justify your lack of commitment to spirituality. You claim to be too busy, too broke, or too overwhelmed with building relationships or handling business deals to focus on the state of your soul and eternity right now; and while you put off these thoughts, you defend your choices by saying it’s not because you dislike them, but simply because it’s inconvenient. You’re not denying the need, you’re just delaying it. But who has guaranteed your life? Who has looked at your destiny and counted the years left in your life? Who has shown you any proof that when you finally decide to repent, it will be a time of health, seriousness, and free time? Who can say that the light guiding your path to success today won’t only shine on your grave when that anticipated moment of repentance arrives? Who gave you the right to change the order that Christ set forth in the reminder, "Seek FIRST the kingdom of God and his righteousness?"
But we have a valuable example to cite. Go to Philippi. Learn of a woman, whose name cannot perish, though generations pass away, and the stars become extinct. Lydia was not a person of leisure; she was a "seller of purple," or cloths, which were died of a purple colour, or purple silks. [49] She had surely sufficient occupation, and yet she has no apologies at hand. She was not too much engaged to be concerned about her eternal salvation; but when the apostle of the Gentiles preaches, she must go, she must hear, she must attend. She was "diligent in business," but this did not preclude her being "fervent in spirit." As a seller of purple she could only have become rich--the acmè, indeed, and summit of human wishes, but a miserable barter for real and everlasting happiness; as a hearer of Paul, she might and did become "wise to salvation."
But we have a valuable example to mention. Look at Philippi. Learn about a woman whose name will never fade, even as generations come and go, and the stars burn out. Lydia wasn’t living a life of leisure; she was a "seller of purple," meaning she sold cloth that was dyed a rich purple color, or purple silks. [49] She definitely had plenty to keep her busy, yet she didn’t have any excuses. She wasn’t too busy to care about her eternal salvation; when the apostle of the Gentiles preached, she knew she had to go, she had to listen, she had to be there. She was "diligent in business," but that didn’t stop her from being "fervent in spirit." As a seller of purple, she could have only become wealthy—the ultimate goal for many, but a poor trade for true and everlasting happiness. As a listener of Paul, she had the chance and did become "wisdom for salvation."
Every thing is beautiful in its season. We must not wander from our proper business under pretence of religion, nor must we neglect religion upon a plea of business. Religion does not require a relinquishment of our calling and station in society, but no civil engagements can justify a disregard of religion. We may sell our purple--but we must also attend to the instructions of the ministry and the word of God. If we imitate Lydia in diligence, let us not forget to imitate her in piety. It is vain and wicked to aver, that, the concerns of this world and those of another interfere; because an ardent religion is not only compatible with worldly occupations, but promotes both their purity and integrity, if it do not secure their success.
Everything is beautiful in its own time. We shouldn’t stray from our responsibilities under the guise of religion, nor should we ignore religion using work as an excuse. Religion doesn’t demand that we abandon our jobs and roles in society, but no work can justify neglecting our faith. We can sell our goods—but we must also pay attention to the teachings of the ministry and the word of God. If we follow Lydia's example in hard work, let’s not forget to follow her example in faith, too. It’s pointless and wrong to claim that the issues of this world clash with those of the next; because a passionate faith is not only compatible with worldly pursuits, but it also enhances their purity and integrity, if it doesn’t ensure their success.
Another effect of divine influence upon the heart of Lydia, and essentially connected with her reception of the great principles of Christianity, was an immediate attention to the ordinance of baptism. "She was baptized and her household." In the true spirit of that apostle from whose lips she received the truth of heaven, and by whom she was directed to "the Lamb of God that taketh away the sin of the world," "she conferred not with flesh, and blood." With a promptitude which was at once expressive of the sincerity of her faith and the zeal of her mind, she did not hesitate to observe the baptismal institution of her Lord and Saviour. What were to her the wonder of ignorant spectators--the ridicule of her fellow-traders--the reflections of her heathen neighbours--when balanced against the approbation of God and her own conscience? She had "bought the truth," and would not sell it--she had found "the pearl of great price," and went and sacrificed every temporal consideration for it--she had "found the Messiah," and was resolved to follow his foot-steps whithersoever they conducted her. She did not dispute or hesitate, but she obeyed. May the bright example of Lydia stimulate us to a similar conduct!
Another effect of divine influence on Lydia's heart, closely related to her acceptance of the core principles of Christianity, was her immediate focus on the act of baptism. "She was baptized, along with her household." In the true spirit of the apostle from whom she heard the heavenly truth and who directed her to "the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world," "she did not consult with anyone." With a readiness that clearly showed her sincere faith and eagerness, she didn't hesitate to follow her Lord and Savior’s command to be baptized. What did the awe of ignorant onlookers, the mockery from her fellow traders, or the scorn from her pagan neighbors matter compared to the approval of God and her own conscience? She had "bought the truth" and would not sell it—she had discovered "the pearl of great price" and sacrificed all earthly concerns for it—she had "found the Messiah" and was determined to follow His path wherever it led her. She didn’t argue or hesitate, but she obeyed. May Lydia's shining example inspire us to do the same!
In the primitive times it is obvious that whoever received the Gospel was baptized in the name of Christ, and to express a resolution to adhere to him. And this obedience is a part of that decision of character which should distinguish the genuine disciple of Christ. He demands it as a proof of love, and by virtue of his supreme authority in the church. The command to be baptized is, in the New Testament, usually connected with the exhortation to repent, because this is the order of things which the Son of God has established, and the most convincing evidence that we have voluntarily devoted ourselves to his service. Baptism was significant of a burial and resurrection with Christ, of being regenerated by his Spirit, renewed by his influence, and separated from all the unholy principles of a depraved nature, and from the sinful practices of a corrupt world. The abundant use of water in this institution was considered as illustrative of the purifying influences of the Holy Spirit, of his miraculous descent on the day of Pentecost, and of the overwhelming sufferings of the crucifixion. The precursor of our Lord predicted Christ as coming to "baptize them with the Holy Ghost and with fire." John immersed our Saviour himself in the river Jordan; when, as he "went up straightway out of the water," he beheld the "heavens opened unto him," saw the descending Spirit of God like a dove, "lighting upon him," and heard a voice saying, "This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased." Viewing in awful perspective the tragical scenes of his life, which were to terminate in the more tragical sufferings of his last hour, he exclaimed, "I have a baptism to be baptized with, and how am I straitened till it be accomplished!"
In ancient times, it was clear that anyone who accepted the Gospel was baptized in the name of Christ to show their commitment to him. This obedience is part of the character that should set apart a true disciple of Christ. He requires it as evidence of love and based on his ultimate authority in the church. The command to be baptized in the New Testament is usually linked with the call to repent, as this reflects the order established by the Son of God and serves as the most convincing proof that we have willingly dedicated ourselves to his service. Baptism symbolizes a burial and resurrection with Christ, being reborn by his Spirit, renewed by his influence, and separating ourselves from the unholy principles of a corrupted nature and from the sinful behaviors of a corrupt world. The abundant use of water in this practice illustrates the purifying impact of the Holy Spirit, his miraculous arrival on the day of Pentecost, and the overwhelming sufferings of the crucifixion. The forerunner of our Lord predicted that Christ would come to "baptize them with the Holy Ghost and with fire." John baptized our Savior himself in the River Jordan; as he "came up straightway out of the water," he saw the "heavens opened" to him, witnessed the Spirit of God descending like a dove "landing on him," and heard a voice saying, "This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased." Reflecting on the tragic events of his life that would lead to the even more tragic sufferings of his last moments, he exclaimed, "I have a baptism to be baptized with, and how am I straitened till it be accomplished!"
Happily, Lydia was not alone in her public profession of religion. She had the satisfaction of seeing her household introduced by baptism into the church of Christ. We are not informed either of their number, sex, or age. The circumstances of the case seem most naturally to point out her servants or adult children, to whom, as in the instance of the jailer, the word of the Lord might be addressed. She no doubt felt extreme solicitude for their spiritual interests, and from the moment of her own conversion would give them every opportunity of attending the apostolic instruction. To have witnessed in them the kindlings of divine love, the workings of genuine penitence, the dawnings of true religion, must have afforded her the richest pleasure, in comparison with which all the accumulations of trade and commerce dwindled into perfect insignificance.
Fortunately, Lydia wasn't alone in her public expression of faith. She found joy in seeing her family baptized into the church of Christ. We aren't told how many of them there were, or their gender or age. It seems likely that this involved her servants or adult children, to whom, like in the case of the jailer, the word of the Lord could be spoken. She probably felt deep concern for their spiritual well-being and, from the moment she converted, she would have made sure they had every chance to attend the apostolic teachings. Witnessing in them the sparks of divine love, genuine remorse, and the beginnings of true faith must have brought her immense joy, making all her successes in business seem trivial by comparison.
But let us inquire whether we resemble Lydia. Do we monopolize the hopes of salvation and the cup of spiritual blessing? or are we active distributors of the heavenly bounty? What do we feel for our families, our children, our domestics, our dependants, our friends and connections? What have we done for them? They need instruction--they possess souls to be saved, or lost--they are responsible creatures--they are given us in charge by providence, and will finally meet us at the tribunal of God. Should it not awaken alarm to be accessary in any degree to their destruction by negligence, if not by compulsion or by bad example? Is it not worthy of a holy ambition to become instrumental to their eternal welfare? Do you lead them to the domestic altar? Do you watch over their conduct with a vigilant and paternal eye? Do you guide them to the house of God?--To show them the path to heaven--to be instrumental in lodging one important sentiment in their minds--to sow, if but a single grain, that may vegetate and rise into a tree of holiness, is incalculably more satisfactory and more honourable than to obtain the victories of an Alexander, or the riches of a Croesus. O, let us never remain content with a solitary religion; but aim, like Lydia, to multiply our satisfactions, and in the spirit of an exalted charity, to distribute happiness in the earth! "None of us liveth to himself, and no man (as a Christian,) dieth to himself."
But let's ask ourselves if we’re like Lydia. Do we hoard the hopes of salvation and spiritual blessings for ourselves, or are we actively sharing the gifts from above? What do we feel for our families, our children, our household members, our dependents, our friends, and our connections? What have we done for them? They need guidance—they have souls that need saving or are at risk of being lost—they are responsible beings—they’ve been entrusted to us by providence, and we will ultimately meet them in God’s judgment. Shouldn't it alarm us to be in any way complicit in their downfall due to negligence, even if not by force or poor example? Isn't it worthy of a noble ambition to play a role in securing their eternal welfare? Do you lead them to family prayers? Do you watch over their behavior with a caring and protective eye? Do you guide them to the house of God?—To show them the way to heaven—to instill one significant idea in their hearts—to plant even a single seed that might grow into a tree of holiness is far more rewarding and honorable than winning the battles of an Alexander or accumulating the wealth of a Croesus. Oh, let’s never be satisfied with a solitary faith; instead, let’s strive, like Lydia, to multiply our joys and share happiness generously on this earth! "None of us lives for ourselves, and no one (as a Christian) dies for themselves."
A third and most visible effect of Lydia's conversion, was an affectionate regard to the servants of Christ. With the zeal of a new convert and the generosity of a genuine Christian, she invited Paul and the companions of his labours to "come into her house and abide there." She thus proved herself "a lover of hospitality, a lover of good men;" which although it be one of the appropriate characteristics of "a bishop," or spiritual overseer and pastor, enters into the very elements of a religious character in every station. We are exhorted "to do good to all men, especially to them that are of the household of faith:" and Jesus Christ has represented love to the brethren as an indication of discipleship.
A third and most noticeable effect of Lydia's conversion was her warm regard for the servants of Christ. With the enthusiasm of a new believer and the kindness of a true Christian, she invited Paul and his coworkers to "come into her house and stay there." She showed herself to be "a lover of hospitality, a lover of good people," which, although it's a key quality of "a bishop," or spiritual leader and shepherd, is essential to the very makeup of a religious character in any role. We are encouraged "to do good to all people, especially to those who are part of the household of faith;" and Jesus Christ identified love for fellow believers as a sign of being His disciple.
The invitation of Lydia was not cold and formal. She did not merely pass the compliment of asking these holy guests to her board, but solicited it as a favour, and with an unusual degree of importunity. She entreated--she "constrained" them. Her plea was modest, but so expressed as to be irresistible. They could not deny her request when put upon this basis: "If ye have judged me to be faithful to the Lord, come into my house."
The invitation from Lydia wasn't stiff or formal. She didn't just politely invite these holy guests to her home; she asked them as a favor and with an uncommon level of insistence. She begged—she "urged" them. Her request was humble but presented in a way that was hard to refuse. They couldn't reject her appeal when she framed it this way: "If you believe I've been faithful to the Lord, come to my house."
Gratitude was undoubtedly a principal occasion of this urgency. She had received through their instrumentality the best gift of Heaven. The eyes of her understanding had been enlightened--the affections of her heart had been excited and sanctified to a noble purpose. They had proclaimed to her with surprising effect, "Jesus and the resurrection;" and, although she had been a devout proselyte of the Jewish religion, she would not, humanly speaking but for them, have become acquainted with the Christian, of which the former was only a pre-figurative shadow. They had unlocked the door of wisdom, and put her in possession of the ample treasures of truth; they had taught her the evil of sin, and shown her "the Lord our righteousness;" they had dispersed her doubts, dispelled her fears, removed her darkness, satisfied her inquiries, and conducted her to "the light of the world," new risen upon benighted nations, and whose blessed radiance was already diffused in every direction. Lydia was anxious to repay these benefits, or rather to testify her overwhelming sense of their immensity. What could she do but invite them home? They were "strangers," amongst senseless idolaters and persecuting foes, and she "took them in," conscious of having incurred an obligation which she could but imperfectly discharge. And have we cherished similar sentiments? Have we revered and ministered to the servants of our Lord? Have we supplied their necessities--cherished their persons--guarded their reputation? Have we thus "rendered honour to whom honour is due"--esteeming them very highly in love for their work's sake--and having made "partakers of their spiritual things," considered it our "duty to minister unto them in carnal things?" Respect for the truth itself ought to generate a suitable predilection for such as faithfully dispense it. We should value the "earthen vessels" for the sake of "the heavenly treasure" they contain. If in any instances the professed ministers of the Gospel act inconsistently with their character, a mind like that of Lydia, would not become dissatisfied with the truth itself, nor hastily utter extravagant censure. We have known persons take an apparent pleasure in detailing the faults of persons eminent either for character, or for official situation. They have betrayed, by their triumphant air, significant inuendoes, or needless circumstantiality, a secret and criminal gratification, whilst loudly protesting their sorrow. But a sincere piety, which sympathises with all the adversities and prosperities of the Christian cause, and knows the general and especially the personal consequences of such deplorable inconsistencies, will commiserate, and weep, and pray.
Gratitude was clearly a main reason for her urgency. Through them, she had received the greatest gift from Heaven. Her understanding had been enlightened—the feelings of her heart had been stirred and dedicated to a noble purpose. They had proclaimed to her with amazing impact, "Jesus and the resurrection;" and although she had been a devoted follower of the Jewish faith, she wouldn’t have come to know the Christian faith, which was merely a foreshadowing of the latter, if not for them. They had opened the door to wisdom and given her access to the vast treasures of truth; they had shown her the wrongness of sin and introduced her to "the Lord our righteousness;" they had cleared her doubts, calmed her fears, lifted her darkness, answered her questions, and led her to "the light of the world," newly risen over darkened nations, whose blessed glow was already spreading in all directions. Lydia was eager to repay these blessings, or rather to express her overwhelming gratitude for them. What could she do but invite them home? They were "strangers" among thoughtless idolaters and hostile enemies, and she "welcomed them in," aware that she had taken on a debt that she could only partially repay. And have we held similar feelings? Have we respected and served the servants of our Lord? Have we met their needs—valued their well-being—protected their reputation? Have we thus "rendered honor to whom honor is due," holding them in high regard for their work—and having become "partakers of their spiritual gifts," considered it our "duty to support them in practical ways?" Respect for the truth itself should inspire a proper affection for those who faithfully convey it. We should appreciate the "earthen vessels" for the sake of the "heavenly treasure" they hold. If, in any case, the claimed ministers of the Gospel act inconsistently with their role, a mindset like Lydia's wouldn’t lead one to be dissatisfied with the truth itself or quickly voice extreme criticism. We’ve seen people seemingly enjoy highlighting the faults of those who are distinguished either for character or position. They have revealed, through their self-satisfied demeanor, suggestive hints, or unnecessary detail, a hidden and wrongful delight, all while loudly expressing their sorrow. But a genuine piety, which resonates with all the struggles and successes of the Christian mission, and understands the general and particularly personal effects of such troubling inconsistencies, will empathize, mourn, and pray.
The importunity of Lydia was no less honorable to Paul and his coadjutors than to herself. It proves their delicacy and consideration. They felt unwilling to accept her hospitality, lest it should prove burdensome or troublesome. These were not men to take advantage of the impressions they produced, and to gain a subsistence by art and fraudulence. They knew how to use prosperity, and how to sustain adversity, how to "abound, and to suffer want." They were not ashamed of poverty, nor afraid of labour. Hardship, imprisonments, scourgings, and even death, had lost their terrors; and on every occasion they were solicitous of evincing a disinterestedness of spirit that might compel their bitterest enemies to attest the purity of their motives. Hence Paul could appeal to the elders of the Ephesian church, "I have coveted no man's silver, or gold, or apparel. Yea, you yourselves know, that these hands have ministered unto my necessities, and to them that were with me;" and to the Corinthian believers, "what is my reward then? Verily, that when I preach the gospel, I may make the gospel of Christ without charge; that I abuse not my power in the gospel." His language to the Thessalonians is still more remarkable: "We did not eat any man's bread for nought; but wrought with labour and travel night and day that we might not be chargeable to any of you."
The insistence of Lydia was every bit as honorable to Paul and his companions as it was to her. It shows their sensitivity and thoughtfulness. They were hesitant to accept her hospitality because they didn’t want it to become a burden or hassle for her. These were not men who took advantage of the feelings they stirred up or made a living through trickery and deceit. They knew how to handle success and how to endure hardship, how to "have plenty and to go without." They weren’t ashamed of being poor or afraid of hard work. Hardship, imprisonment, beatings, and even death had lost their fear factor; and they were always keen to demonstrate a selflessness that could make even their harshest critics acknowledge the integrity of their intentions. That’s why Paul could tell the leaders of the Ephesian church, "I haven’t coveted anyone's silver, gold, or clothing. You all know that these hands have provided for my needs and for those with me;" and to the believers in Corinth, he said, "So what’s my reward? Truly, it’s that when I preach the gospel, I can share the gospel of Christ without charging anything; so I don’t misuse my authority in the gospel." His words to the Thessalonians are even more striking: "We didn’t take anyone’s food for free; instead, we worked hard day and night so that we wouldn’t be a burden to any of you."
Lydia might probably be influenced in making this request by another consideration. She expected great advantage from more familiar intercourse with her guests. In the social hour--at the friendly table--in the retirement of home--she could propose inquiries, which such a man as Paul would be happy to hear, and ready to answer. He who could thus address the saints at Rome--I long to see you, that I may impart unto you some spiritual gift, to the end ye may be established; that is, that I may be comforted together with you, by the mutual faith both of you and me--"must have proved an interesting companion to so pious and inquisitive a woman." She would receive him as a father and honour him as an apostle. Happy, thrice happy for us, when we make a proper selection of our bosom friends, and improve the hours of social intercourse to the purposes of spiritual improvement! Nothing is more advantageous than reciprocal communication; it elicits truth, corrects mistake, improves character, conduces to happiness, animates to diligence, and gives anew impulse to our moral energies. "Then they that feared the Lord spake often one to another, and the Lord hearkened and heard it; and a book of remembrance was written before him for them that feared the Lord and that thought upon his name. And they shall be mine, saith the Lord of hosts in that day when I make up my jewels; and I will spare them as a man spareth his own son that serveth him. Then shall ye return and discern between the righteous and the wicked; between him that serveth God and him that serveth him not."
Lydia was likely influenced to make this request by another thought. She anticipated great benefits from getting closer to her guests. During social time—at the friendly dinner table—in the comfort of her home—she could ask questions that someone like Paul would be happy to hear and eager to answer. He, who could address the saints in Rome—"I long to see you so I can share some spiritual gift with you, to help establish you; that is, to bring comfort to both of us through our shared faith"—must have been an intriguing companion to such a devout and curious woman. She would welcome him as a father and honor him like an apostle. We're so fortunate when we choose our close friends wisely and use our social time for spiritual growth! There's nothing more beneficial than open communication; it brings out truth, corrects mistakes, enhances character, leads to happiness, motivates us to work hard, and gives a fresh boost to our moral strength. "Then those who feared the Lord spoke often to one another, and the Lord listened and heard it; and a book of remembrance was written before Him for those who feared the Lord and thought about His name. 'They shall be mine,' says the Lord of hosts, 'in that day when I gather my precious ones; and I will spare them as a man spares his own son who serves him. Then you will return and see the difference between the righteous and the wicked; between those who serve God and those who do not.'"
In reviewing this history, we cannot help regreting the specimen it affords of the paucity of real Christians. The whole city of Philippi furnished only Lydia, the jailer, and a few others, who attended to the preaching of Paul. Immersed in business, devoted to superstition, or depraved by sensuality, the glad tidings of salvation were despised or disregarded. They had neither eyes to see, ears to hear, nor hearts to feel. The God of this world blinded them, that they did not believe. There was not even a Jewish synagogue in Philippi--not one altar erected to the true God--and only a small retreat by the river-side, to which a few female inquirers resorted unnoticed or abhorred. Such is the world in miniature! In reviewing the long track of ages, we can observe but here and there a traveller along the road to Zion. The "narrow way" appears an unfrequented path, while thousands and myriads crowd the "broad road that leadeth to destruction." The page of history is not adorned with the names of saints, but, blessed be God, they are recorded in Scripture, and will shine forever in the annals of eternity.
In looking back at this history, we can’t help but regret how few true Christians there were. The entire city of Philippi had only Lydia, the jailer, and a few others who listened to Paul’s preaching. People were too caught up in their businesses, focused on superstitions, or consumed by their desires to care about the good news of salvation. They had neither the ability to see, hear, nor feel. The God of this world had blinded them so they wouldn’t believe. There wasn’t even a Jewish synagogue in Philippi—no altar dedicated to the true God—only a small gathering by the riverside, where a few curious women came, unnoticed or rejected. This reflects the world in miniature! As we look through the ages, we can spot only a few travelers on the road to Zion. The "narrow way" seems lonely, while thousands and thousands take the "broad road that leads to destruction." The pages of history aren’t filled with the names of saints, but thankfully, they are recorded in Scripture and will shine forever in the records of eternity.
The subject, however, presents another aspect. Lydia was the first convert to the Christian faith in EUROPE! In her heart was deposited the first seed that was sown in this new field of labour, in which so rich and extensive a harvest has since sprung up. It was then, indeed, according to the parabolical representations of Christ, but as "a grain of mustard seed," which is the "least of all seeds;" but what a plant has it since become, striking deep its roots, and waving wide its branches, so that the nations recline beneath its refreshing shade, and feel the healing virtue of its sacred leaves! At that distant period, while Asia was under spiritual culture, Europe presented nothing to the eye but an outstretched wilderness of desolation--ignorance spread over her fairest regions "gross darkness," and the very "shadow of death"--and superstition reigned upon his gloomy throne with triumphant and universal dominion. The particular state of Britain may be inferred from the general condition of the world; but if any difference existed, there is reason to suppose, from its peculiar disadvantages and insular situation, that a blacker midnight enveloped this region, than spread over the more civilized provinces of the Roman empire. There was, indeed, no nation in which the grossest practices of idolatry did not prevail, and where human nature did not appear in a state of awful degeneracy. Their very reason was folly; their very religion impiety. Let us, then, be unceasingly grateful to that providence, which has not only sent the gospel to Europe, but has caused the light to shine with peculiar glory in this favoured land, which, at its first promulgation, was in a state of singular depravity; fixed, so to speak, in the very meridian of the benighted hemisphere.
The topic, however, has another side. Lydia was the first person to convert to the Christian faith in EUROPE! In her heart was planted the first seed sown in this new field of work, from which such a rich and extensive harvest has since grown. At that time, it was, according to Christ's parables, just "a grain of mustard seed," the "smallest of all seeds;" but look at what it has become, spreading deep roots and wide branches, so that nations can find rest in its refreshing shade and feel the healing power of its sacred leaves! Back then, while Asia was experiencing spiritual growth, Europe looked like a vast wilderness of desolation—ignorance masked its most beautiful regions with "thick darkness," and the very "shadow of death" loomed over them—while superstition ruled with triumphant and widespread control. The state of Britain can be inferred from the general condition of the world; but if there were any differences, it’s likely that due to its unique disadvantages and insular position, this area was covered in a darker night than the more civilized provinces of the Roman Empire. Indeed, there was no nation where the most outrageous practices of idolatry didn’t exist, and where humanity didn’t seem to be in a state of terrible decline. Their very logic was foolishness; their very religion was irreverence. So let’s always be thankful to that providence, which has not only brought the gospel to Europe but has caused its light to shine with special brilliance in this favored land, which, at its first emergence, was in a state of remarkable depravity; fixed, so to speak, at the very center of the dark hemisphere.
Britain has now emerged into day; and has not only caught the rising beam of mercy, but is becoming the very centre of illumination to every kindred and people of the globe. The different orders of Christians engaged in missionary under-takings--Moravian, Baptist, Independent, and Church Societies, ought to be mentioned with distinguished approbation, and hailed as FELLOW LABOURERS in the vineyard. May they ever co-operate and not control each other! May they be one in spirit, though diverse in operation! May they unite their respective energies in one common cause, while bigotry retires abashed from the glory of such a scene!
Britain has now stepped into the light of day; it has not only embraced the dawn of compassion but is also becoming the very center of enlightenment for all nations and peoples around the world. The various Christian denominations involved in missionary work—Moravian, Baptist, Independent, and Church Societies—should be acknowledged with great respect and welcomed as FELLOW WORKERS in the field. May they always collaborate and not compete with each other! May they be united in spirit, even if they operate differently! May they combine their efforts for a common purpose, while intolerance steps back, humbled by such a glorious sight!
Above all, "the United Kingdoms may fairly claim, what has been freely and cheerfully accorded by foreign nations, the honor of giving birth to an institution, (the British and Foreign Bible Society,) the most efficacious ever devised, for diffusing that knowledge which was given to make men wise unto salvation.
Above all, "the United Kingdoms can rightfully claim what has been willingly and happily granted by other countries: the honor of creating an institution, (the British and Foreign Bible Society,) the most effective ever established for spreading the knowledge intended to lead people to salvation."
"But although the approbation so generally bestowed on the British and Foreign Bible Society, may be received as a gratifying homage to the simplicity, purity, benevolence, and importance of its design, it is not to the praise of men, but to the improvement of their moral and religious state, that the Society aspires. Acting under the influence of an ardent desire to promote the glory of God, and adopting the spirit of the apostolic injunction, 'As we have opportunity let us do good unto all men, especially to those who are of the household of faith;' its object is to administer comfort to the afflicted, and rest to the weary and heavy-laden; to dispense the bread and water of life to those who hunger and thirst after righteousness; to feed the flock of Christ at home and abroad; and to impart to those who sit in darkness the cheering rays of the Sun of Righteousness.
"But while the widespread approval of the British and Foreign Bible Society can be seen as a positive acknowledgment of the simplicity, purity, kindness, and significance of its mission, the Society aims not for human praise but for the betterment of people’s moral and spiritual condition. Driven by a strong desire to honor God, and embracing the spirit of the apostolic command, 'As we have opportunity, let us do good to all people, especially to those of the faith,' its goal is to provide comfort to those in distress and rest to the weary and burdened; to offer the bread and water of life to those who seek righteousness; to nurture the flock of Christ both locally and internationally; and to bring the hopeful light of the Sun of Righteousness to those in darkness."
"The theatre on which the Society displays its operations, is that of the whole world. Considering all the races of men as children of one common Father, who 'maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust;' and who wills 'that all men should come to the knowledge of the truth;' the British and Foreign Bible Society offers the records of eternal life to the bond and the free, to Heathens and Christians,--in the earnest hope that they may become a lamp unto the feet, and a light unto the paths of those who now receive them, and of generations yet unborn.
"The stage on which the Society operates is the entire world. Viewing all people as children of one common Father, who 'makes the sun rise on both the evil and the good, and sends rain on the just and the unjust;' and who desires 'that everyone comes to know the truth;' the British and Foreign Bible Society offers the records of eternal life to both the enslaved and the free, to non-believers and Christians--in the hopeful belief that these may serve as a guide to those who receive them and to future generations."
"To support the character which the British and Foreign Bible Society has assumed, to realize the hopes which it has excited, to foster and enlarge the zeal which it has inspired, are obligations of no common magnitude, and which cannot be discharged without correspondent exertions. 'As a city that is set on a hill cannot be hid,' the eyes of nations look up to it with expectation. Immense portions of the globe, now the domains of idolatry and superstition; regions where the light of Christianity once shone, but is now dim or extinguished; and countries where the heavenly manna is so scarce, that thousands live and die without the means of tasting it,--point out the existing claims on the benevolence of the Society.
"Supporting the role that the British and Foreign Bible Society has taken on, fulfilling the hopes it has raised, and nurturing the enthusiasm it has generated are significant responsibilities that require considerable effort. 'Like a city on a hill that can't be hidden,' nations look to it with anticipation. Vast areas of the world, currently dominated by idolatry and superstition; regions where the light of Christianity once shone but is now dim or gone; and countries where the spiritual nourishment is so scarce that thousands live and die without experiencing it—these highlight the urgent needs that call for the Society's generosity."
"To supply these wants, fill up these voids, and display the light of revelation amidst the realms of darkness, will long require a continuance of that support which the British and Foreign Bible Society has derived from the public piety and liberality, and perhaps the persevering efforts of succeeding generations. Let us not, however, be weary in well doing; 'for in due season we shall reap, if we faint not.'
"To meet these needs, fill these gaps, and shine the light of revelation in the midst of darkness will require ongoing support from the public's generosity and devotion, as well as the determined efforts of future generations. However, let us not get tired of doing good; 'for in due season we shall reap, if we do not give up.'"
"Whatever may be the extent of the existing or increasing claims on the British and Foreign Bible Society, it has ample encouragement to proceed in its sacred duty of disseminating the Word of Life.
"Whatever the size of the current or growing demands on the British and Foreign Bible Society, it has plenty of motivation to continue its important mission of spreading the Word of Life."
"'I will bring the blind by a way that they knew not; I will lead them in paths that they have not known; I will make darkness light before them, and crooked things straight.'
"'I will guide the blind along a path they haven't known; I will lead them on roads they haven't traveled; I will turn darkness into light for them, and make the crooked things straight.'"
"These are the words of the Almighty himself. Let the British and Foreign Bible Society, uniting its prayers with those that are daily offered up at home and abroad for the blessing of God on its proceedings, humbly hope that it may become the instrument of his providence, for accomplishing his gracious promises; and that, by means of the Scriptures distributed through its exertions, or by its influence and encouragement, nations now ignorant of the true, God, may learn 'to draw water from the wells of salvation.' The prospect is animating, the object holy, its accomplishment glorious; for the prospective efforts of the Society are directed to a consummation, (whether attainable by them or not, is only known to Him who knoweth all things,) when all the ends of the earth, adopting the language of inspiration, shall unite their voices in the sublime strains of heavenly adoration: 'Blessing and honour, and glory and power, be unto Him that sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb for ever and ever: Hallelujah! for the Lord God Omnipotent reigneth!"' [50]
"These are the words of the Almighty himself. The British and Foreign Bible Society, joining its prayers with those that are offered daily at home and around the world for God's blessing on its efforts, humbly hopes to be an instrument of His providence, fulfilling His gracious promises; and that, through the Scriptures distributed by its work, or by its influence and support, nations that currently don't know the true God may learn 'to draw water from the wells of salvation.' The outlook is inspiring, the goal is sacred, and achieving it would be glorious; for the future efforts of the Society are aimed at a completion, (whether they can achieve it or not is known only to Him who knows all things), when all the ends of the earth, using the language of inspiration, will raise their voices in the beautiful hymns of heavenly praise: 'Blessing and honor, and glory and power, be unto Him that sits upon the throne, and unto the Lamb forever and ever: Hallelujah! for the Lord God Omnipotent reigns!'" [50]
Essay on What Christianity Has Done for Women
At this distance of time, and possessing only the very brief information with which it has pleased Infinite Wisdom to furnish us in the commencing chapters of the book of Genesis, it is impossible to ascertain with precision the nature of that disparity which originally subsisted between the first parents of mankind. The evidence does not seem to be decisive, whether their characteristic differences were merely corporeal or mental, exterior or internal, natural and essential, or accidental. It is questionable whether the superiority of Adam arose out of the revelations he received, and the priority of his existence to his "fair partner Eve," or from an innate pre-eminence which marked him, not only as the head of the inferior creation, but as the appointed lord of the woman. A close examination of the subject, perhaps, would lead us to infer, that an equality subsisted in all those respects which are not strictly classed under the epithet constitutional; and that the authority which revelation has conceded to the man, results from his present fallen condition.
Given the time that has passed and relying only on the brief information provided by Infinite Wisdom in the opening chapters of the book of Genesis, it’s impossible to accurately determine the nature of the differences that originally existed between the first human parents. The evidence doesn’t clearly indicate whether their differences were purely physical or mental, external or internal, natural and essential, or accidental. It's uncertain whether Adam's superiority came from the revelations he received and his existence before his "beautiful partner Eve," or from an inherent status that identified him not only as the leader of the lower creation but also as the designated authority over the woman. A deeper exploration of the topic might suggest that there was equality in all areas that don’t strictly fall under the term constitutional; and that the power granted to men through revelation comes from their current fallen state.
It is indeed observable, that when God determined upon the creation of the woman, because it was not deemed good that the man should be alone, she is represented as the intended "help meet for him;" but this expression is not perhaps to be understood, as referring so much to subserviency as to suitability. The capacity of one being to promote the happiness of another, depends on its adaptation. The virtuous and the vicious, the feeble and the strong, the majestic and the mean, cannot be associated together to any advantage, and a general equality appears requisite, to render any being capable of becoming the help meet to a perfect creature. This idea of his new-formed companion pervades the language of Adam, when she was first brought to him by her Almighty Creator: "This," said he, "is now bone of my bone, and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of man. Therefore shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall cleave unto his wife, and they shall be one flesh."
It’s clear that when God decided to create woman, since it wasn't good for man to be alone, she is described as the intended "help fit for him." However, this phrase shouldn’t just be understood in terms of being subservient, but more about being suitable. The ability of one person to enhance another's happiness relies on their compatibility. The virtuous with the vicious, the weak with the strong, the majestic with the humble, can't really work together in a beneficial way, and some level of equality is necessary for any being to effectively support a perfect being. This concept of his newly formed companion is reflected in Adam's words when she was first presented to him by her Creator: “This,” he said, “is now bone of my bone, and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of man. Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother, and shall join his wife, and they shall be one flesh.”
To this it may be added, that subjection to the man is expressly enjoined as a part of the original curse upon the female. This infliction necessarily implies a previous equality in rank and station. There was evidently before, no competition, no struggle for dominion, and no sense of inferiority or pre-eminence. The language of Jehovah in denouncing the respective destinies of these transgressors, unquestionably conferred a power or claim upon man, which he did not originally possess, and which was intended as a perpetual memento of the woman having been the first to disobey her Maker. "Unto the woman" he said, "I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shall bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall ride over thee."
To add to this, it's important to note that being submissive to man is explicitly referred to as part of the original curse on women. This punishment implies that there was once equality in status and position. Clearly, there wasn't any competition, struggle for power, or feeling of inferiority or superiority before. When Jehovah spoke about the different fates of these wrongdoers, he undeniably granted a power or claim to man that he originally didn't have, which was meant to serve as a lasting reminder that the woman was the first to defy her Creator. "To the woman," he said, "I will greatly increase your pain in childbirth; in pain you will give birth to children; your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you."
But, whatever were the original equalities or inequalities of the human race, this, at least, is certain, that the influence of depraved passions since the fall, is sufficiently conspicuous in rendering the claims and duties of both sexes more and more ambiguous, and disarranging the harmonies of the first creation. In proportion to the degree in which society is corrupt, power will assume an authority over weakness, and they who ought to be help meets will become competitors. Opposition generates dislike, and dislike, when associated with power, will produce oppression. It is in vain to plead the principle of right, to solicit attention to the voice of reason, or to attempt to define the boundaries of influence, when no means exist of enforcing the attention of him who can command obedience. There is no alternative but submission or punishment. Upon this principle, the female sex may be expected to become the sport of human caprice, folly, and guilt. But Christianity tends to rectify the disorders which sin has introduced into the universe, and both in a natural and moral sense, to restore a lost paradise. Like that mighty Spirit, which in the beginning moved upon the surface of the waters, when the earth was without form and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep, it corrects the confusion of the moral system, pervades and reorganizes the formless mass of depraved society, and pacifies the turbulence of human passions. With a majesty that overawes, a voice that will be heard, an influence that cannot be resisted, it renews the world, and will eventually diffuse its unsetting glory through every part of the habitual globe.
But regardless of the initial equalities or inequalities of the human race, it is clear that the impact of corrupt passions since the fall has made the claims and responsibilities of both genders increasingly unclear, disrupting the harmony of creation. The more corrupt society becomes, the more power will dominate those who are weak, and those who should be supportive partners will turn into rivals. Conflict breeds animosity, and animosity, when combined with power, leads to oppression. It's pointless to argue for the principle of right, to seek the attention of reason, or to try to outline the limits of influence when there’s no way to compel those who hold power to listen. The only options are submission or punishment. Based on this, we can expect women to become victims of human whims, foolishness, and wrongdoing. However, Christianity aims to correct the chaos that sin has introduced into the world, striving both in a natural and moral sense to restore a lost paradise. Like that great Spirit that once moved over the waters when the earth was formless and empty, and darkness was across the deep, it addresses the disorder of the moral framework, infiltrates and reorganizes the chaotic mass of corrupt society, and calms the turbulence of human desires. With an awe-inspiring majesty, a voice that demands attention, and an irresistible influence, it renews the world and will ultimately spread its everlasting glory throughout every part of the earth.
The subject before us presents a large field of research, and it would well repay the labour to walk with a deliberate step around its spacious borders and throughout its ample extent; but we must content ourselves with tracing out some of its principal varieties, and collecting comparatively a few of its productions.
The topic in front of us offers a vast area for research, and it would be worthwhile to take a thoughtful approach as we explore its wide-ranging aspects; however, we have to settle for outlining some of its main types and gathering only a handful of its outcomes.
Our plan will require the induction of facts, as the necessary basis of argument or illustration; and these refer to the state of women, in countries and during periods in which the religion of the Bible was wholly unknown, as in the nations of Pagan antiquity, in Greece and Rome; in savage, superstitious, and Mahometan regions; and their condition previously to the establishment of Christianity, in patriarchal time and places, or during the Jewish theocracy.
Our plan will need to introduce facts, which are essential for supporting our arguments or illustrations; these will focus on the status of women in times and places where the Bible was completely unknown, such as in the pagan ancient nations of Greece and Rome, in savage, superstitious, and Muslim areas; and their situation before the rise of Christianity, in patriarchal times and locations, or during the Jewish theocracy.
I. The Pagan Nations of Antiquity demand the first consideration.
I. The Pagan Nations of Ancient Times demand the first consideration.
Our knowledge of the ancient Egyptians is extremely limited, being derived from the Greek writers, whose accounts are often contradictory. Their testimony, however, is sufficiently precise respecting the prevalence of domestic servitude. The Egyptians were a people remarkable for jealousy, which was carried to such an extreme, that after the death of their wives, they even entertained apprehensions respecting the embalmers. [51] Having decreed it to be indecent in women to go abroad without shoes, they deprived them of the means of wearing them, by threatening with death any one who should make shoes for a woman. They were forbidden music, probably with a view of preventing their possessing so dangerous an attraction as that of an elegant accomplishment.
Our understanding of the ancient Egyptians is very limited, mainly based on Greek writers whose accounts are often conflicting. However, their descriptions are clear enough about the widespread presence of domestic servitude. The Egyptians were notably jealous, to the point that after their wives died, they even worried about the embalmers. [51] They considered it inappropriate for women to go outside without shoes, so they took away the ability to wear them by threatening death to anyone who made shoes for a woman. Women were also banned from music, likely to prevent them from having the risky allure of a refined skill.
With regard to the Celtic nations, it is true, that the Romans were surprised at the degree of estimation in which these barbarous tribes held their women, and the privileges which they conceded to them; and it must be admitted that certain stern virtues characterized those who were addicted to military achievements, resulting partly from their incessant occupation as warriors, and partly from some indefinite but splendid ideas of fame and glory. Seduction and adultery were vices of rare occurrence; the bridegroom bestowed a dowery upon the bride, consisting of flocks, a horse ready bridled and saddled, a shield, a lance, and a sword; [52] and they were often stimulated by their presence and excitement in their warlike expeditions. But though generally contented with one wife, the nobles were allowed a plurality, either for pleasure or show; the labours of the field, as well as domestic toil, devolved on the women; which, though practised in very ancient times, even by females of the most exalted rank, evidently originated in the general impression of their inferiority in the scale of existence. Their great Odin, or Odinus, excluded from his paradise all who did not by some violent death follow their deceased husbands; and in time they were so degraded, that by an old Saxon law, he that hurt or killed a woman was to pay only half the fine exacted for injuring or killing a man. But the argument in favour of Christianity, as assigning women their proper place in society, is corroborated by observing the extremes of oppression and adulation, to which the Scandinavian nations alternately veered. While polygamy and infanticide prevailed, the practice of raising into heroines, prophetesses, and goddesses, some of their women, was no less indicative of a very imperfect sense of the true character of the female sex. [53] The public and domestic life of the Greeks exhibit unquestionable evidences of barbarity in the treatment of women. Homer, and all their subsequent writers, show that they were subjected to those restrictions, which infallibly indicate their being regarded only as the property of men, to be disposed of according to their will. Hence they were bought and sold, made to perform the most menial offices, and exposed to all the miseries and degradation of concubinage. The daughters, even of persons of distinction, were married without any consultation of their wishes, to men whom, frequently, they had never seen, and at the early age of fourteen or fifteen; previous to which period, the Athenian females were kept in a state of as great seclusion as possible. Their study was dress; and slaves, their mothers excepted, were their only companions. The duties of a good wife were, in the opinion of the wisest of the Greeks, comprised in going abroad to expose herself as little as possible to strangers, taking care of what her husband acquired, superintending the younger children, and maintaining a perpetual vigilance over the adult daughters. After marriage, some time elapsed before they ventured to speak to their husbands, or the latter entered into conversation with them. At no time were wives intrusted with any knowledge of their husbands' affairs, much less was their opinion or advice solicited; and they were totally excluded from mixed society. One of the most excellent of the Athenians admitted, there were few friends with whom, he conversed so seldom as with his wife. [54]
With regard to the Celtic nations, it's true that the Romans were surprised by how much these barbaric tribes valued their women and the privileges they gave them. It must be acknowledged that certain strict virtues characterized those who were focused on military achievements, stemming partly from their constant role as warriors and partly from some vague but grand ideas about fame and glory. Seduction and adultery were rare vices; the bridegroom gave a dowry to the bride that included flocks, a horse ready to ride, a shield, a lance, and a sword; [52] and they were often motivated by the excitement of their warlike pursuits. Although they were generally satisfied with one wife, nobles were allowed multiple wives for either pleasure or show; the work in the fields and household chores fell to the women, which, though practiced since ancient times, even by women of high status, clearly stemmed from a general perception of their inferiority. Their great Odin, or Odinus, excluded from his paradise all who did not die violently after their husbands; over time, they were so degraded that an old Saxon law stated that if someone hurt or killed a woman, they only had to pay half the fine required for harming or killing a man. However, the argument for Christianity assigning women their proper place in society is supported by observing the extremes of oppression and idolization to which the Scandinavian nations alternately resorted. While polygamy and infanticide were common, the practice of elevating some of their women to the status of heroines, prophetesses, and goddesses also revealed a very flawed understanding of the true nature of women. [53] The public and domestic lives of the Greeks show clear evidence of barbarity in how women were treated. Homer and all subsequent writers reveal that women were subjected to restrictions that clearly indicated they were seen merely as men's property, to be dealt with according to men's will. Thus, they were bought and sold, made to perform menial tasks, and faced all the hardships and degradation of being concubines. Even the daughters of distinguished individuals were married without regard for their wishes, often to men they had never met, at the young age of fourteen or fifteen; before that age, Athenian girls were kept as secluded as possible. Their main focus was on appearance, and aside from their mothers, slaves were their only companions. According to the wisest Greeks, a good wife's duties included going out as little as possible, managing what her husband earned, overseeing the younger children, and constantly watching over the adult daughters. After marriage, it took some time before they would speak to their husbands or before their husbands would engage in conversation with them. Wives were never entrusted with knowledge of their husbands' affairs, much less were their opinions or advice sought; they were completely excluded from mixed social gatherings. One of the most respected Athenians admitted that he conversed with his wife less frequently than with almost anyone else. [54]
Solon, in his laws, is silent with regard to the education of girls, though he gave very precise regulations for that of boys. That legislator imagined that women were not sufficiently secluded, and therefore directed that they should not go abroad in the daytime, except it were in full dress; or at night, but with torches and in a chariot. He prohibited their taking eatables out of the houses of their husbands of more value than an obolus, or carrying a basket more than a cubit in length. [55] The Athenians had previously possessed the power of selling their children and sisters; and even Solon allowed fathers, brothers, and guardians, this right, if their daughters, sisters, and wards, had lost their innocence. From various enactments, it appears that adultery was extremely common, and female modesty could not be preserved even by legislative restraint. Most of the Greeks, and even their philosophers, concurred with the Eastern nations in general in associating with courtesans; who were, indeed, honoured with the highest distinctions. The Corinthians ascribed their deliverance, and that of the rest of Greece, from the power of Xerxes, to the intercession of the priestess of Venus, and the protection of the goddess. At all the festivals of Venus, the people applied to the courtesans as the most efficacious intercessors; and Solon deemed it advantageous to Athens, to introduce the worship of that goddess, and to constitute them her priestesses. In the age of Pericles, and still more afterward, prostitution, thus yoked with superstition, and sanctioned by its solemnities, produced the most baneful effects upon public morals. From idolatrous temples, the great reservoirs of pollution, a thousand streams poured into every condition of life, and rolling over the whole of this cultivated region, deposited the black sediment of impurity upon the once polished surface of society, despoiling its beauty, discolouring its character, and ruining its glory.
Solon, in his laws, doesn't address the education of girls, even though he set clear regulations for boys. He believed women weren't kept enough out of public view, so he ordered that they should only go outside during the day if they were fully dressed, and at night only with torches and in a chariot. He forbade them from taking food worth more than a small coin from their husbands' homes or from carrying a basket longer than about a foot. [55] In the past, Athenians were allowed to sell their children and sisters, and even Solon permitted fathers, brothers, and guardians this right if their daughters, sisters, and wards had lost their purity. Various laws indicate that adultery was very common, and female modesty couldn't be preserved even by laws. Most Greeks, including their philosophers, agreed with Eastern nations in associating with courtesans, who were actually honored with high status. The Corinthians credited their freedom, as well as that of the rest of Greece, from Xerxes's power to the priestess of Venus and the goddess's protection. At all the festivals of Venus, people turned to the courtesans as the most effective mediators; Solon thought it beneficial for Athens to introduce the worship of that goddess and to make them her priestesses. During the time of Pericles, and even more so afterward, prostitution, intertwined with superstition and backed by rituals, had a highly damaging impact on public morals. From idolatrous temples, which were major sources of corruption, countless streams flowed into every aspect of life, spreading the dark sediment of impurity across the once polished surface of society, tarnishing its beauty, distorting its character, and ruining its glory.
The Athenians did not hesitate to take their wives and daughters to visit the notorious Aspasia in the house of Pericles, though she was the teacher of intrigue, and the destroyer of morals. The most celebrated men lived in celibacy, only to secure the better opportunities of practising vice, which however did not conceal her hideous deformity in the shades, but stalked forth at noonday, emblazoned by the eloquence of a Demosthenes, and enriched by treasuries of opulence.
The Athenians freely took their wives and daughters to visit the infamous Aspasia at Pericles' house, even though she was known for her manipulative ways and moral corruption. The most famous men chose to remain single, just to have more chances to indulge in vice, which, however, didn't hide her ugly flaws in the shadows, but instead came to light at noon, highlighted by the brilliance of a Demosthenes and backed by immense wealth.
In many respects the Spartans differed from the other Greeks in their treatment of the female sex. The women were as shamefully exposed as those of the other states were secluded; being introduced to all the exercises of the public gymnasium at an early age, no less than the other sex, and taught the most shameless practices. The laws of Lycurgus were in many instances utterly subversive of morality, and too outrageous for citation. The depravity of the sex was extreme even at an early period, and Xenophon, Plutarch, and Aristotle, impute to this cause the ultimate subversion of the Spartan state.
In many ways, the Spartans were different from other Greeks in how they treated women. While women in other states were kept hidden away, Spartan women were openly engaged in athletic activities from a young age, just like men, and were even taught practices that would be considered improper. The laws of Lycurgus often went against common morals and were too extreme to quote. The corruption among women was significant even early on, and thinkers like Xenophon, Plutarch, and Aristotle believed this was a key reason for the eventual downfall of the Spartan state.
The Romans differed materially from the Greeks and the oriental nations in one point with regard to their treatment of women; namely, in never keeping them in a state of seclusion from the society of men: but the husbands were very incommunicative: and it seems at least to have been an understood, if not a written law, that they should avoid all inquisitiveness, and speak only in the presence of their husbands. In the second Punic war, the Oppian law prohibited the women, from riding in carriages and wearing certain articles of dress; which was, however, afterward repealed. The ancient laws considered children as slaves, and women as children who ought to remain in a state of perpetual tutelage. According to the laws of Romulus and Numa, a husband's authority over his wife was equal to that of a father over his children, excepting only that he could not sell her. The wife was stated to be in servitude, though she had in name the rights of a Roman citizen. From the moment of her marriage she was looked upon as the daughter of her husband and heir of his property, if he had no children; otherwise she was considered as his sister, and shared an equal portion with the children. Wives had no right to make wills, nor durst they prefer complaints against their husbands; and the power of the latter over them was as unrestricted as that which they possessed over their children: in fact, the husband could even put his wife to death, not only for gross immoralities, but for excess in wine. [56]
The Romans significantly differed from the Greeks and Eastern nations in their treatment of women by never keeping them isolated from men. However, husbands were quite uncommunicative, and it seemed to be an understood rule, if not a formal one, that they should limit their questions and only speak in front of their husbands. During the second Punic War, the Oppian law banned women from riding in carriages and wearing certain types of clothing, though this was later repealed. Ancient laws viewed children as slaves and women as children who should remain in a constant state of guardianship. According to the laws of Romulus and Numa, a husband's authority over his wife was equal to a father's control over his children, except he couldn't sell her. A wife was considered to be in servitude, although she had the rights of a Roman citizen in name. Once married, she was regarded as her husband's daughter and heir to his property if he had no children; otherwise, she was seen as his sister and would share equally with the children. Wives had no right to create wills and couldn't file complaints against their husbands; the husbands' power over them was as absolute as their control over their children: indeed, a husband could even kill his wife, not just for serious immoral acts, but also for drinking too much. [56]
Considerable changes took place in the laws after the period of the destruction of Carthage, some of which allowed greater privileges to females; but as divorces became more frequent, crimes multiplied. In the latter periods of the republic women had the principal share in public plots and private assassinations, and practised the worst of sins with the most barefaced audacity.
Significant changes happened in the laws after Carthage was destroyed, some of which granted more rights to women; however, as divorces increased, so did crimes. In the later stages of the republic, women played a major role in public conspiracies and private murders, engaging in the worst sins with shocking boldness.
The morals of women are indicative of the state of society in general, and of the estimation in which they are held in particular. If the other sex treat them as slaves, they will become servile and contemptible, a certain degree of self-respect being essential to the preservation of real dignity of character. The way to render human beings of any class despicable is to undervalue them; for disesteem will superinduce degeneracy. If this be the case, then the state of women in any age or country is a criterion of public opinion, since the vices of their lives indicate their condition; upon which principle, Greece and Rome exhibit wretched specimens of female degradation.
The morality of women reflects the overall state of society and how they are valued in particular. If men treat them like slaves, they will become submissive and despised, as a certain level of self-respect is crucial for maintaining true dignity. The best way to make any group of people contemptible is to devalue them; a lack of respect will lead to degeneration. If this is true, then the status of women in any time or place serves as a measure of public opinion, since the flaws in their lives reveal their condition; based on this principle, Greece and Rome show terrible examples of female degradation.
But there is one circumstance in the history of the Romans which must not be wholly overlooked. Their conduct was marked by capriciousness. Though the usual treatment of their women resembled that of other Pagan nations in barbarity, like some of them, too, they frequently rendered them extraordinary honours. On some occasions they even transferred to their principal slaves the right of chastising their wives; and yet, on others they paid them distinguished deference: as in the case of vestals, and the privileges conceded to them after the negotiation between the Romans and Sabines. Various individual exceptions to a barbarous usage might be adduced; sufficient, however, only to evince the general debasement of the female sex, and the total absence of all fixed principles of moral action in unchristianized man.
But there is one aspect of Roman history that shouldn't be overlooked. Their behavior was marked by whimsicality. While the way they treated their women was often just as brutal as other Pagan cultures, they also sometimes gave them remarkable honors. At times, they even allowed their top slaves the authority to discipline their wives; however, in other instances, they showed them notable respect, like in the case of the vestals and the privileges granted to them after negotiations between the Romans and the Sabines. There might be some individual exceptions to this harsh treatment, but they only serve to highlight the overall degradation of women and the complete lack of fixed moral principles in unchristianized humanity.
II. Next to the nations of antiquity, the state of women in SAVAGE, SUPERSTITIOUS, AND MAHOMETAN COUNTRIES, comes under review.
II. Next to the ancient nations, the situation of women in WILD, SUPERSTITIOUS, AND MUSLIM COUNTRIES is examined.
In treating this part of the subject, it will be necessary to make a rapid circumnavigation of the globe, touching at least at the most remarkable places.
In discussing this part of the topic, we should quickly travel around the world, stopping at least at the most notable locations.
Europe.
GREENLAND. The situation of females in this country might well justify the exclamation of an ancient philosopher, who thanked God that he was born a man and not a woman. The only employment of girls, till their fourteenth year, is singing, dancing, amusements, attending on children, and fetching water; [57] after which they are taught, by their mothers, to sew, cook, tan the skins of animals, construct houses, and navigate boats. It is common for the men to stand by as idle spectators, while the women are carrying the heaviest materials for building; the former never attempting to do any thing but the carpenter's work. Parents frequently betroth their daughters in infancy, and never consult their wishes respecting marriage; if no previous pledge be given, they are disposed of to the first suiter that chances to make the application. From their twentieth year, the usual period of marriage, the lives of the women, says Cranz, are a continued series of hardships and misery. The occupations of the men solely consist in hunting and fishing; but so far from giving themselves the trouble to carry home the fish they have caught, they would think themselves eternally disgraced by such a condescension.
GREENLAND. The position of women in this country might make one echo the words of an ancient philosopher, who expressed gratitude for being born a man and not a woman. Until they turn fourteen, girls are occupied with singing, dancing, playing, taking care of children, and fetching water; [57] after that, they learn from their mothers how to sew, cook, tan animal skins, build houses, and navigate boats. It's common for men to stand by and watch as women carry the heaviest materials for construction; the men only take on the carpentry work. Parents often arrange marriages for their daughters when they're still infants and never consider their preferences regarding marriage; if there isn’t an existing agreement, daughters are simply given to the first suitor who shows interest. After turning twenty, which is the typical age for marriage, women, according to Cranz, experience a constant cycle of hardship and suffering. The men’s activities are limited to hunting and fishing; however, they would consider it a great shame to carry home the fish they've caught, believing it beneath them.
The Greenlanders have two kinds of boats, adapted to procure subsistence. One of them is the great woman's boat called the umiak, from twelve to eighteen yards in length, and four or five in width. These boats are rowed by four women, and steered by a fifth, without any assistance from the men, excepting in cases of emergency. If the coast will not allow them to pass, six or eight women take the boat upon their heads, and carry it over land to a navigable place.
The Greenlanders have two types of boats designed for gathering food. One of them is the large woman’s boat called the umiak, which measures between twelve to eighteen yards long and four or five yards wide. Four women row these boats, while a fifth woman steers, without any help from the men, except in emergencies. If the coastline doesn't allow them to pass, six or eight women lift the boat onto their heads and carry it overland to a spot where they can navigate.
Mothers-in-law are absolute mistresses in the houses of their married sons, who frequently ill-treat them; and the poor women are sometimes obliged to live with quarrelsome favourites, and may be corrected or divorced at pleasure. Widows who have no friends, are commonly robbed of a considerable portion of their property by those who come to sympathize with them by an affected condolence; and can obtain no redress,--on the contrary, they are obliged to conciliate their kindness by the utmost obsequiousness. After a precarious subsistence in different families, and being driven from one hut to another, they are suffered to expire without help or notice. When widows have grown-up sons, their condition is much superior to that in which they formerly lived with their husbands. When aged women pretend to practise, or are suspected of witchcraft--if the wife or child of a Greenlander happen to die--if his fowling piece miss fire, or his arrow the mark at which it was shot--the supposed sorceress is instantly stoned, thrown into the sea, or cut in pieces by the angekoks or male magicians. There have even been instances of sons killing their mothers, and brothers their sisters. The infirmities of age expose women to violent deaths, being sometimes with their own consent, and sometimes forcibly, interred alive by their own offspring.
Mothers-in-law hold significant power in the homes of their married sons, who often mistreat them; these unfortunate women sometimes have to live with difficult favorites and can be dismissed or divorced at will. Widows with no support frequently lose a large part of their property to those who come to "comfort" them with fake sympathy and can’t find any justice—instead, they must win over their kindness with extreme submission. After struggling to get by in various households and being pushed from one place to another, they are left to die without help or acknowledgment. When widows have grown sons, their situation is much better than when they lived with their husbands. When elderly women are suspected of practicing witchcraft—if a Greenlander’s wife or child dies, if his gun misfires, or if his arrow misses its target—the supposed witch is quickly stoned, thrown into the sea, or dismembered by male shamans. There have even been cases of sons killing their mothers and brothers harming their sisters. The frailty of old age makes women vulnerable to violent deaths, often being buried alive by their own children, sometimes with consent and sometimes against their will.
RUSSIA. Over this extensive empire, including sixteen different nations, the condition of women is such as equally to evince the degraded character of the men. Among the Siberians, an opinion is entertained that they are impure beings, and odious to the gods; in consequence of which, they are not permitted to approach the sacred fire, or the places of sacrifice. In the eastern islands, in particular, there exists tribes to whom the nuptial ceremony is unknown; and in cases where the daughters are purchased by goods, money, or services, their fathers never consult their children, and their husbands treat them as slaves or beasts of burden. In Siberia, conjugal fidelity is bartered for gain, or sacrificed at the shrine of imaginary hospitality. The sale of their wives is by no means uncommon, for a little train oil, or other paltry considerations. To this the women offer no objection, and at an advanced age frequently seek younger wives for their husbands, and devote themselves to domestic drudgery. [58] The same degrading facts apply to the Tungusians and other tribes. In some respects the Kamtschadales differ from the rest, but the extreme debasement arising from their libidinous brutality must not be described, and can scarcely be credited. [59]
RUSSIA. Throughout this vast empire, which includes sixteen different nations, the status of women reflects the lowly nature of men. Among the Siberians, there is a belief that women are unclean and detestable to the gods, leading to restrictions that prevent them from approaching sacred fires or places of sacrifice. In the eastern islands, especially, there are tribes where marriage ceremonies do not exist; when daughters are 'bought' with goods, money, or services, their fathers never consult them, and their husbands treat them like slaves or pack animals. In Siberia, marital loyalty is exchanged for profit or sacrificed in the name of false hospitality. The sale of wives is not uncommon, often occurring for trivial items like a small amount of train oil or other meager considerations. Women often do not resist this and, as they grow older, frequently seek younger wives for their husbands, dedicating themselves to household chores. [58] The same degrading truths apply to the Tungusians and other tribes. The Kamtschadales differ from the others in some ways, but the extreme degradation due to their crude brutality is beyond description and hard to believe. [59]
Among all the Slavon nations of Europe, wives and daughters have ever been kept in a state of exclusion. Brides are purchased, and instantly become slaves. Formerly sons were compelled by blows to marry, and daughters dragged by their hair to the altars; and the paternal authority is still unbounded. The lower classes are doomed to incessant labour, and are obliged to submit to the utmost indignities. [60]
Among all the Slavic nations of Europe, wives and daughters have always been kept in a position of exclusion. Brides are bought, and immediately become slaves. In the past, sons were forced into marriage through violence, and daughters were literally dragged by their hair to the altars; paternal authority remains unchecked. The lower classes are condemned to endless work and forced to endure the worst humiliations. [60]
The picture of Russian manners varies little with reference to the prince or the peasant.... They are all, high and low, rich and poor, alike servile to superiors; haughty and cruel to their dependants, ignorant, superstitions, cunning, brutal, barbarous, dirty, mean. The emperor canes the first of his grandees; princes and nobles cane their slaves; and the slaves their wives and daughters. [61]
The depiction of Russian behavior doesn't change much whether it's about the prince or the peasant. They are all, whether high or low, rich or poor, equally submissive to their superiors; proud and harsh to those below them, ignorant, superstitious, sly, brutal, uncivilized, filthy, and petty. The emperor punishes his top nobles; princes and nobles punish their slaves; and the slaves punish their wives and daughters. [61]
ITALY AND SPAIN. These two countries may be classed together, because the condition of the female sex is very similar in both: the education of woman is totally neglected, and they are not ashamed of committing the grossest blunders in common conversation. Such is their situation that they cannot intermeddle with the concerns of their husbands, without exciting their jealousy. Girls are in early years left to the care of servants who are both ill educated and immoral; the same may be said of their mothers, whose conversation and public conduct tend to perfect the growth of licentiousness in their uncultivated children.
ITALY AND SPAIN. These two countries can be grouped together because the status of women is quite similar in both: women's education is completely ignored, and they aren’t embarrassed about making the biggest mistakes in everyday conversations. Their situation is such that they can’t get involved in their husbands' affairs without stirring up jealousy. Young girls are often left in the hands of servants who are poorly educated and have questionable morals; the same goes for their mothers, whose discussions and behavior in public encourage the development of immorality in their unrefined children.
PORTUGAL. Young women in this kingdom are not instructed in any thing truly useful or ornamental; and even those who belong to respectable families, are often ignorant of reading and writing. Parents keep their daughters in the most rigid confinement, frequently not allowing them even to go abroad to church to hear mass, and never unattended. They are secluded from all young persons of the other sex, who are not permitted to visit families where there are unmarried females. The consequence of this austerity is an extended system of intrigue, for the purpose of evading all this circumspection--by which means they are full of cunning and deceit.
PORTUGAL. Young women in this kingdom aren’t taught anything truly useful or decorative; even those from respectable families often can’t read or write. Parents keep their daughters in strict confinement, frequently not allowing them to go out even to church to attend mass, and never alone. They are isolated from all young men, who are not allowed to visit households with unmarried women. The result of this strictness is a widespread web of secret affairs, aimed at getting around all these restrictions—making them very crafty and deceptive.
TURKEY. Women, in Constantinople, are confined in seraglios for life, or shut up in their apartments. They are not permitted to appear in public without a vail, and can only obtain their freedom by devoting themselves to prostitution.
TURKEY. Women in Constantinople are kept in seraglios for life or locked away in their apartments. They aren't allowed to go out in public without a veil and can only gain their freedom by turning to prostitution.
"The slave market," says Mr. Thornton, "is a quadrangle, surrounded by a covered gallery, and ranges of small and separate apartments. The manner of purchasing slaves is described in the plain and unaffected narrative of a German merchant, which, as I have been able to ascertain its general authenticity, may be relied on as correct in this particular. He arrived at Kaffa, in the Crimea, which was formerly the principal mart of slaves; and hearing that an Armenian had a Georgian and two Circassian girls to dispose of, feigned an intention of purchasing them, in order to gratify his curiosity, and to ascertain the mode of conducting such bargains. A Circassian maiden, eighteen years old, was the first who presented herself; she was well dressed, and her face was covered with a vail. She advanced towards the German, bowed down, and kissed his hand: by order of her master, she walked backwards and forwards in the chamber to show her shape, and the easiness of her gait and carriage: her foot was small, and her gesture agreeable. When she took off her vail, she displayed a bust of the most attractive beauty. She rubbed her cheeks with a wet napkin, to prove that she had not used art to heighten her complexion; and she opened her inviting lips, to show a regular set of teeth of pearly whiteness. The German was permitted to feel her pulse, that he might be convinced of the good state of her health and constitution. She was then ordered to retire, while the merchants deliberated upon the bargain. The price of this beautiful girl was four thousand piastres, [equal to four thousand five hundred florins of Vienna."] [62]
"The slave market," Mr. Thornton says, "is a square area surrounded by a covered walkway and rows of small, separate rooms. The way slaves are bought is described in the straightforward account of a German merchant, which I've been able to verify for its general accuracy, so it can be trusted in this regard. He arrived in Kaffa, in Crimea, which used to be the main slave market; upon learning that an Armenian had a Georgian girl and two Circassian girls for sale, he pretended he wanted to buy them to satisfy his curiosity and see how these deals were done. The first one to come forward was an eighteen-year-old Circassian girl; she was well-dressed and her face was covered by a veil. She moved towards the German, bowed deeply, and kissed his hand. By her master’s command, she walked back and forth in the room to show off her figure and how gracefully she moved; her foot was small, and her movements were pleasant. When she took off her veil, she revealed an extraordinarily beautiful bust. She rubbed her cheeks with a wet cloth to prove she hadn’t used makeup to enhance her complexion and opened her inviting lips to reveal a perfect set of pearly white teeth. The German was allowed to check her pulse to confirm she was in good health. Then she was told to step back while the merchants discussed the deal. The price for this beautiful girl was four thousand piastres, about four thousand five hundred florins from Vienna." [62]
GREECE. The condition of females, in Modern Greece, may be inferred from an anecdote or two related by Lieutenant Collins. He and his friends were approaching Macri, on the coast of Asia Minor. "Encouraged to proceed," he remarks, "we approached the second groupe, which we passed in a similar manner; but some woman, who were near them, appeared to fly at our approach, and view us at a distance with astonishment and fear. But no sooner had we advanced, than, as with general consent, they all caught their children in their arms, and with the fears of a mother apprehensive for the safety of a beloved child, flew to their houses, and shut themselves in, and we saw no more of them till our return.
GREECE. The status of women in Modern Greece can be understood through a couple of stories told by Lieutenant Collins. He and his friends were nearing Macri, on the coast of Asia Minor. "Encouraged to proceed," he notes, "we approached the second group, which we passed in a similar way; but some women nearby seemed to react to our presence with shock and fear. No sooner had we moved forward than, almost in unison, they all grabbed their children and, with the instincts of mothers worried about the safety of their precious kids, rushed to their homes, locking themselves in, and we didn’t see them again until we returned."
"Our company during dinner consisted of Greeks only--it was served up by the women, attended by one of her children, who with all the family appeared in an abject state; for on offering her a little of the wine, which they so kindly furnished us with, she shrunk back, with an expression of surprise at our condescension, which excited ours also; and the man understanding a little Italian, we inquired the reason; 'Such,' says he, is the inferiority and oppression we labour under, that it is in general thought too great honour for a Turk to present a person of this description with, any token of respect, and forward in her to accept it, which is the reason of her timidity, in not accepting the wine from you.'" [63]
"Our dinner company was entirely Greek—it was served by the women, attended by one of their children, who, along with the entire family, looked very downtrodden. When we offered her a little of the wine they kindly provided, she recoiled in surprise at our kindness, which surprised us too. The man, who understood a bit of Italian, explained, 'The inferiority and oppression we endure is such that it’s generally considered too great an honor for a Turk to offer a person like her any sign of respect, and she feels too intimidated to accept it from you.'" [63]
In Greece, the women are closely confined at home; they do not even appear at church till they are married. The female slaves are not Greeks, but such as are either taken in war or stolen by the Tartars from Russia, Circassia, or Georgia. Many thousands were formerly taken in the Morea, but most of them have been redeemed by the charitable contributions of the Christians, or ransomed by their own relations. The fine slaves that wait upon great ladies, are bought at the age of eight or nine years, and educated with great care to accomplish them in singing, dancing, embroidery, &c. They are commonly Circassian, and their patron rarely ever sells them, but if they grow weary of them, they either present them to a friend, or give them their freedom.
In Greece, women are kept mostly at home; they don’t even go to church until they’re married. The female slaves aren’t Greek; they’re usually captured in war or taken by Tartars from Russia, Circassia, or Georgia. Many thousands were captured in the Morea, but most have been saved through the generosity of Christians or ransomed by their families. The well-trained slaves that serve wealthy women are bought at around eight or nine years old and are carefully raised to excel in singing, dancing, embroidery, etc. They’re usually Circassian, and their owners typically don’t sell them. If they tire of them, they either give them to a friend or set them free.
Asia.
TARTARY. This immense country, in its utmost limits, reaches from the Eastern Ocean to the Caspian Sea; and from Corea, China, Thibet, Hindoostan, and Persia, to Russia, and Siberia; including a space of three thousand six hundred miles in length, and nine hundred and sixty in width, and comprehending all the middle region of Asia. Its two great divisions are into Eastern and Western; the former chiefly belongs to the emperor of China, the latter to Russia.
TARTARY. This vast country extends from the Eastern Ocean to the Caspian Sea, and from Korea, China, Tibet, India, and Persia to Russia and Siberia; it covers approximately three thousand six hundred miles in length and nine hundred sixty miles in width, encompassing all the central region of Asia. Its two main divisions are Eastern and Western; the Eastern part mainly belongs to the emperor of China, while the Western part is under Russia.
The Mahometan Tartars are continually waging war against their neighbours for the purpose of procuring slaves. When they cannot obtain adults, they steal children to sell, and even make no scruple of selling their own, especially daughters. In case of any disgust, their wives share a similar fate. Among the pagan Tartars incestuous practices are prevalent, and their wives are generally dismissed at, or previous to, the age of forty. The mothers of sultans, among the Crim Tartars, neither eat with their sons, nor sit in their presence. They are, in fact, the slaves of their caprice, often ill-treated by them, and sometimes even put to death. [64]
The Muslim Tartars are constantly fighting their neighbors to capture slaves. When they can't get adults, they kidnap children to sell, and they don't hesitate to sell even their own kids, especially daughters. If there's any annoyance, their wives face a similar fate. Incestuous behavior is common among the pagan Tartars, and their wives are typically dismissed at or before the age of forty. The mothers of sultans among the Crimean Tartars do not eat with their sons or sit in their presence. They are essentially at their mercy, often mistreated and sometimes even killed. [64]
The Calmucks are considered as remarkably lenient in their conduct to the women: but fathers dispose of their daughters without their consent, and even antecedently to their birth. Their chiefs and princes have, besides, large harems or seraglios where domestic rivalship imbitters existence. They are, moreover, regarded in general as servants, and infidelity is compensated by a trifling offering to their mercenary rapacity.
The Calmucks are seen as surprisingly lenient in how they treat women, but fathers arrange marriages for their daughters without their permission, even before they are born. Their leaders and nobles also have large harems where jealousy makes life difficult. Additionally, women are generally viewed as servants, and infidelity is brushed aside with a small gift to appease their greedy nature.
The Georgians and Circassians are celebrated for their surpassing beauty, and their young women are brought up to some industrious habits. The daughters of slaves receive a similar education, and are sold according to their beauty, at from twenty to a hundred pounds each, or upwards. They consider all their children in the light of property, exposing them to sale as they would their cattle, and too often obtain large sums from the agents of despotism and depravity.
The Georgians and Circassians are known for their stunning beauty, and their young women are raised with a strong work ethic. The daughters of slaves receive a similar upbringing and are sold based on their looks, for prices ranging from twenty to a hundred pounds or more. They view all their children as property, selling them like livestock, and all too often, they receive large payments from the agents of tyranny and corruption.
CHINA. In this, and almost all the countries of Southern Asia, the condition of women is truly deplorable. Forced marriages and sales are universal, and the Chinese are so excessively jealous, that they do not permit their wives to receive any visitors of the other sex, and transport them from place to place in vehicles secured by iron bars. Their concubines are not only treated with the most degrading inhumanity, but are slaves to the wives, who never fail to sway a despotic sceptre; they are besides liable at any time to be sold. The children of concubines are regarded as the offspring of the legitimate wife; hence they manifest no affection for their real mothers, but often treat them with the most marked disrespect. The laws of China and Siam allow the lawful wives and sons, after the death of their husbands and fathers, to exclude concubines and their children from all share in the property of the deceased, and to dispose of their persons by public or private sale.
CHINA. In this country, as in almost all of Southern Asia, the status of women is truly appalling. Forced marriages and sales are commonplace, and the Chinese are so excessively jealous that they don’t allow their wives to have any visitors of the opposite sex, transporting them from place to place in vehicles secured by iron bars. Concubines are not only treated with extreme cruelty, but are also slaves to the wives, who wield absolute power; they can be sold at any time as well. The children of concubines are considered the offspring of the legal wife, so the wives show no affection for their biological mothers and often treat them with significant disrespect. The laws of China and Siam permit lawful wives and sons, after the death of their husbands and fathers, to exclude concubines and their children from any share in the deceased's property and to dispose of them through public or private sale.
The wives of people of rank are always confined to their apartments from motives of jealousy; those of a middle class are a kind of upper servants deprived of liberty; and the wives of the lower orders are mere domestic drudges. The handsomest women are usually purchased for the courts and principal mandarins.
The wives of high-ranking individuals are often kept in their rooms due to jealousy; those from the middle class act like upper servants without freedom; and the wives of the lower class are just household workers. The most beautiful women are typically acquired for the courts and top officials.
"We can readily," says a respectable writer, "give credit to the custom of a landlord taking the wife of a ryat or peasant, as a pledge for rent, and keeping her till the debt is discharged (in the kingdom of Nepaul;) since we know, on the best authority, that their wise polished neighbours, the Chinese, have found it necessary to enact a prohibitory statute against lending wives and daughters on hire." [65]
"We can easily," says a respected writer, "acknowledge the practice of a landlord taking the wife of a tenant or peasant as collateral for rent, and holding her until the debt is paid off (in the kingdom of Nepal); since we know, from reliable sources, that their sophisticated neighbors, the Chinese, have deemed it necessary to create a law against lending out wives and daughters for hire." [65]
Another writer observes, "Since the philosophical inquiry into the condition of the weaker sex, in the different stages of society, published by Millar, [66] it has been universally considered as an infallible criterion of barbarous society, to find the women in a state of great degradation. Scarcely among savages themselves is the condition of women more wretched and humiliating than among the Chinese. A very striking picture of the slavery and oppression to which they are doomed, but too long for insertion in this place, is drawn by M. Vanbraam. [67] Mr. Barrow informs us, that among the rich, the women are imprisoned slaves; among the poor, drudges; 'many being,' says he, 'compelled to work with an infant upon the back, while the husband, in all probability, is gaming,--I have frequently seen women,' he adds, 'assisting to drag a sort of light plough, and the harrow. The easier task, that of directing the machine, is left to the husband.' [68] The Chinese value their daughters so little, that when they have more children than they can easily maintain, they hire the midwives to stifle the females in a basin of water as soon as they are born.' [69] Nothing can exceed the contempt towards women which the maxims of the most celebrated of their lawgivers express. 'It is very difficult,' said Confucius himself, 'to govern women and servants; for if you treat them with gentleness and familiarity, they lose all respect; if with rigour, you will have continual disturbance.'
Another writer notes, "Since the philosophical exploration into the status of women at different stages of society, published by Millar, [66] it has been universally viewed as a clear indicator of a barbaric society if women are in a state of severe degradation. Hardly anywhere, even among savages, is the condition of women more miserable and humiliating than in China. M. Vanbraam paints a very vivid picture of the slavery and oppression they endure, but it’s too lengthy to include here. [67] Mr. Barrow tells us that among the wealthy, women are treated as imprisoned slaves; among the poor, they are laborers; 'many being,' he says, 'forced to work with a baby on their back, while the husband, likely, is gambling. I have often seen women,' he continues, 'helping to pull a type of lightweight plow and harrow. The easier task, of managing the machine, is left to the husband.' [68] The Chinese value their daughters so little that when they have more children than they can support, they pay midwives to drown the female newborns in a basin of water right after birth.' [69] Nothing surpasses the contempt for women expressed in the teachings of their most famous lawmakers. 'It is very difficult,' said Confucius himself, 'to manage women and servants; for if you treat them gently and like friends, they lose all respect; if with strictness, you will have constant trouble.'"
"Women are debarred almost entirely from the rights of property; and they never inherit. Among the worst savage nations, their daughters are sold to their husbands, and are received and treated as slaves. [70] When society has made a little progress, the purchase-money is received only as a present, and the wife, nominally at least, is not received as a slave. Among the Chinese, the daughter, with whom no dowry is given, it uniformly exchanged for a present; and so little is the transaction, even on a purchase, disguised, that Mr. Barrow has no scruple to say, 'the daughters may be said to be invariably sold.' [71] He assures us, that 'it is even a common practice among the Chinese to sell their daughters, that they may he brought up as prostitutes.'" [72] [73]
"Women are mostly denied property rights, and they never inherit. Even among the most primitive cultures, daughters are sold to their husbands and treated like slaves. [70] As society progresses, the money received is seen more as a gift, and the wife is technically not regarded as a slave. In Chinese culture, daughters, who don’t come with a dowry, are consistently exchanged for a gift; and the nature of the transaction, even in a purchase, is so openly acknowledged that Mr. Barrow freely states, 'the daughters may be said to be invariably sold.' [71] He emphasizes that 'it is even a common practice among the Chinese to sell their daughters so they can be raised as prostitutes.'" [72] [73]
BIRMAN EMPIRE. This extensive dominion comprehends the state of Pegu, Ava, Arracan, and Siam. Women are not secluded from the society of men, but they are held in great contempt. Their evidence is undervalued in judicial proceedings. The lower classes sell their women to strangers, who do not, however, seem to feel themselves degraded. In Pegu, Siam, Cochin China, and other districts, adultery is regarded as honourable. Herodotus mentions a people called Gendanes, where the debasement of the female character is such, that their misconduct is an occasion of boasting and a source of distinction.
BIRMAN EMPIRE. This vast territory includes the regions of Pegu, Ava, Arracan, and Siam. Women are not kept apart from men, but they are treated with great disdain. Their testimony carries little weight in court cases. The lower classes sell their women to outsiders, who don’t seem to see it as a disgrace. In Pegu, Siam, Cochin China, and other areas, adultery is viewed positively. Herodotus talks about a group called the Gendanes, where the degradation of women is so extreme that their wrongdoing is a cause for pride and recognition.
HINDOOSTAN. The following extracts, from the letters of the Baptist missionaries, in India, will speak volumes, and might, if it were necessary, be corroborated by a thousand similar citations.
HINDOOSTAN. The following excerpts from the letters of the Baptist missionaries in India will say a lot, and could, if needed, be backed up by a thousand similar examples.
At an early period of the Baptist mission to India, Dr. Carey communicated the following interesting account to a friend:--"As the burning of women with their husbands is one of the most singular and striking customs of this people, and also very ancient, as you will see by the Reek Bede, which contains a law relating to it, I shall begin with this. Having just read a Shanscrit book, called Soordhee Sungraha, which is a collection of laws from the various Shasters, arranged under their proper heads, I shall give you an extract from it, omitting some sentences, which are mere verbal repetitions. Otherwise, the translation may be depended on as exact. The words prefixed to some of the sentences are the names of the original books from which the extracts are made.
At an early stage of the Baptist mission in India, Dr. Carey shared an intriguing account with a friend:--"Since the practice of burning women with their husbands is one of the most unique and striking customs of this people, and also very ancient, as you will see in the Reek Bede, which contains a law about it, I will start with this. Having just read a Sanskrit book called Soordhee Sungraha, which is a collection of laws from various Shasters, organized by topic, I will provide you with an excerpt from it, omitting some sentences that are simply repetitive. Otherwise, you can rely on the translation as accurate. The words at the start of some sentences are the names of the original books from which the extracts are taken."
"Angeera. After the husband's death, the virtuous wife who burns herself with him, [74] is like an Asoondhatee, [75] and will go to bliss.--If she be within one day's journey of the place where he dies, and indeed virtuous, the burning of his corpse shall be deferred one day for her arrival.
"Angeera. After her husband's death, the devoted wife who chooses to self-immolate alongside him, [74] is like an Asoondhatee, [75] and will achieve eternal happiness. If she is within a day’s travel from the location of his death, and truly virtuous, the cremation of his body will be postponed for one day to allow her to arrive."
"Brahma Pooran. If the husband die in another country, the virtuous wife shall take any of his effects; for instance, a sandal, and binding it on her thigh, shall enter the fire with it. [76]
"Brahma Pooran. If the husband dies in another country, the virtuous wife shall take any of his belongings; for example, a sandal, and tying it on her thigh, shall enter the fire with it. [76]
"Reek, Bede. If a wife thus burn with her husband, it is not suicide; and her relations shall observe three days' uncleanness for her; after which her Shraddha [77] must he properly performed.--If she cannot come to the place, or does not receive an account of her husband's death, she shall wait the appointed ten days of uncleanness, [78] and may afterwards die in a separate fire.--If she die in a separate fire, three days' uncleanness will be observed; after which the Pinda must be performed.--After the uncleanness on account of the husband is over, the Shraddha must be performed according to the commandment.--Three days after his death, the Dospinda [79] must be made, and after ten days the regular Shraddha.
"Reek, Bede. If a wife burns herself with her husband, it's not considered suicide; her family should observe three days of impurity for her. After that, her Shraddha [77] must be properly performed. If she can’t make it to the place or doesn't hear about her husband's death, she will wait the ten days of impurity [78] and can then die in a separate fire. If she dies in a separate fire, three days of impurity will be observed, after which the Pinda must be performed. After the impurity from her husband ends, the Shraddha must be performed according to the rules. Three days after his death, the Dospinda [79] must be done, and ten days later, the regular Shraddha should take place."
"Goutam. Brahmmanee can only die with her husband, on which account she cannot burn in another fire. When a woman dies with her husband, the eldest son, or nearest relation, shall set fire to the pile; whose office also it is to perform the Dospinda, and all the obsequies. He who kindles the fire shall perform the Dospinda: [80] but her own son, or nearest relations, must perform the Shraddha.--If a woman burn separately, only three days' uncleanness will be observed for her; but if in the same fire ten days.
"Goutam. Brahmmanee can only die with her husband, which is why she cannot be cremated with another fire. When a woman dies alongside her husband, the eldest son or nearest relative is responsible for lighting the pyre; it is also their duty to perform the Dospinda and all the funeral rites. The person who lights the fire must perform the Dospinda: [80] but her own son or nearest relatives must carry out the Shraddha. If a woman is cremated separately, there will be a period of three days' ritual impurity observed for her; however, if she is cremated in the same fire as her husband, it will be ten days."
"Asouch Shunkar. If another person die before the last day of uncleanness for a death or birth, then the uncleanness on account of the second person's death will be included in the first, and the time not lengthened out.
"Asouch Shunkar. If another person dies before the final day of uncleanness due to a death or birth, then the uncleanness resulting from the second person's death will be combined with the first, and the duration will not be extended."
"Bishnoo Pooran. If the husband die in war, only present uncleanness, or till bathing, will be observed for him: if, therefore, the wife burn with him only one night's uncleanness will be observed for her; but, if in a separate fire, three days; and in that case the husband's Pinda will be at the end of three days.--If the husband and wife burn in one fire, they will obtain separate offerings of the Shraddha.--If a woman die with her husband voluntarily, the offerings to her, and all her obsequies will be equal to his.--If they die within a Tithee, or lunar day, the offerings will be made to both at the same time.--If the person be Potect, or sinful; that is, has killed a Brahmman, or drinks spirituous liquors, or has committed some sin in his former life, on account of which he is afflicted with elephantiasis, consumption, leprosy, &c. [81] all will be blotted out by his wife burning with him, after proper atonement has been made. [82]--A woman with a young child, or being pregnant, cannot burn with her husband.--If there be a proper person to educate the infant, she may be permitted to burn.--If any woman ascend the pile, and should afterward decline to burn, through love of life or earthly things, she shall perform the penance Prazapatya, and will then be free from sin.'" [83]
"Bishnoo Pooran. If the husband dies in battle, the only period of mourning observed will be for his immediate impurity, or until bathing; therefore, if the wife chooses to join him in death, she will observe only one night of mourning. However, if she does so by another fire, she will observe three days of mourning; and in that case, the husband’s Pinda will be offered after three days. -- If the husband and wife die in the same fire, they will receive separate offerings for the Shraddha. -- If a woman dies together with her husband willingly, her funeral offerings and all her last rites will be treated the same as his. -- If they both pass away on the same Tithee, or lunar day, the offerings will be made for both at the same time. -- If the person is Potect, or sinful; meaning he has killed a Brahmman, drinks alcohol, or has committed some sin in a previous life, resulting in ailments like elephantiasis, tuberculosis, leprosy, etc. [81] all will be forgiven if his wife burns with him, after proper atonement has been performed. [82] -- A woman with a young child, or who is pregnant, cannot burn with her husband. -- If there is someone suitable to care for the infant, she may be allowed to burn. -- If a woman climbs onto the pyre but later refuses to burn due to a desire for life or earthly possessions, she must undergo the penance Prazapatya, and then she will be free from sin." [83]
The following statement is taken from the more recent communication of another of the Baptist missionaries to India:--
The following statement is taken from a recent communication by another Baptist missionary in India:--
"Jan. 9, 1807. A person informing us that a woman was about to be burnt with the corpse of her husband near our house, I, with several of our brethren, hastened to the place; but, before we could arrive, the pile was in flames. It was a horrible sight. The most shocking indifference and levity appeared among those who were present: I never saw anything more brutal than their behaviour. The dreadful scene had not the least appearance of a religious ceremony, It resembled an abandoned rabble of boys in England, collected for the purpose of worrying to death a cat or a dog. A bamboo, perhaps twenty feet long, had been fastened at one end to a stake driven in the ground, and held down over the fire by men at the other. Such were the confusion, the levity, the bursts of brutal laughter, while the poor woman was burning alive before their eyes, that it seemed as if every spark of humanity was extinguished by this cruel superstition. That which added to the cruelty was, the smallness of the fire. It did not consist of so much wood as we consume in dressing a dinner: no, not this fire that was to consume the living and the dead! I saw the legs of the poor creature hanging out of the fire, while her body was in flames. After a while they took a bamboo, ten or twelve feet long, and stirred it, pushing and beating the half-consumed corpse, as you would repair a fire of green wood, by throwing the unconsumed pieces into the middle. Perceiving the legs hanging out, they beat them with the bamboo for some time, in order to break the ligatures which fastened them at the knees; (for they would not have come near to touch them for the world.) At length, they succeeded in binding them upwards into the fire; the skin and muscles giving way, and discovering the knee-sockets bare, with the balls of the leg bones; a sight this, which, I need not say, made me thrill with horror; especially when I recollected that this hopeless victim of superstition was alive but a few minutes before. To have seen savage wolves thus tearing a human body limb from limb, would have been shocking; but to see relations and neighbours do this to one with whom they had familiarly conversed not an hour before, and to do it with an air of levity, was almost too much for me to bear! Turning to the Brahmman who was the chief actor in this horrid tragedy, a young fellow of about twenty-two, and one of the most hardened that ever I accosted, I told him that the system which allowed of these cruelties, could no more proceed from God than darkness from the sun; and warned him, that he must appear at the judgment-seat of God, to answer for this murder. He, with a grin, full of savage contempt, told me that 'he gloried in it, and felt the highest pleasure in performing the deed.' I replied, 'that his pleasure might be less than that of his Master; but seeing it was in vain to reason with him, I turned to the people, and expostulated with them. One of them answered, that 'the woman had burnt herself of her own free choice, and that she went to the pile as a matter of pleasure.'--'Why, then, did you confine her down with that large bamboo?'--'If we had not, she would have run away'--'What, run away from pleasure!' I then addressed the poor lad, who had been thus induced to set fire to his mother. He appeared about nineteen. 'You have murdered your mother! your sin is great. The sin of the Brahmman, who urged you to it, is greater; but yours is very great.'--'What could I do? It is the custom.'--'True, but this custom is not of God; but proceedeth from the devil, who wishes to destroy mankind. How will you bear the reflection that you have murdered your only surviving parent?' He seemed to feel what was said to him; but, just at this instant, that hardened wretch, the Brahmman, rushed in, and drew him away, while the tears were standing in his eyes. After reasoning with some others, and telling them of the Saviour of the world, I returned home with a mind full of horror and disgust.
"Jan. 9, 1807. A person informed us that a woman was about to be burned along with her husband's corpse near our house, so I, along with several others, hurried to the scene; but by the time we arrived, the pyre was already ablaze. It was a horrific sight. The people present showed the most shocking indifference and a disturbing lightheartedness: I had never witnessed anything more brutal than their behavior. The ghastly scene lacked any semblance of a religious ceremony; it resembled a group of reckless boys in England gathered to torment a cat or dog to death. A bamboo pole, maybe twenty feet long, had been secured at one end to a stake in the ground and was being held down over the fire by men on the other end. Amid the chaos, the apathy, and the bursts of savage laughter, the poor woman was burning alive before their eyes, as if every spark of humanity had been snuffed out by this cruel superstition. What made it even more horrifying was the small size of the fire. It didn't consist of more wood than we use to prepare dinner; this was the fire meant to consume both the living and the dead! I saw the poor woman's legs protruding from the flames while her body was engulfed in fire. Eventually, they used a bamboo, ten or twelve feet long, to poke and beat the half-charred corpse, as if trying to manage a fire made of green wood by throwing unburned pieces into the center. Noticing the legs sticking out, they struck them with the bamboo for a while, trying to break the bindings at the knees; they wouldn't dare touch them directly. In the end, they managed to push them into the fire; the skin and muscles gave way, exposing the bare knee sockets and the ends of the leg bones. This was a sight that made me shiver with horror, especially when I remembered that this hopeless victim of superstition had been alive just moments before. To have seen savage wolves tearing a human body apart would have been shocking; but to witness friends and family doing this to someone they had just spoken with an hour earlier, all while acting so nonchalant, was almost unbearable! Turning to the Brahmin who was the main actor in this horrific scene, a young man about twenty-two and one of the most cold-hearted I've ever encountered, I told him that a system allowing for such cruelties could not possibly come from God, just as darkness cannot come from the sun; I warned him that he would have to answer for this murder at God's judgment seat. He grinned, full of savage contempt, and told me that he 'took pride in it and felt the greatest pleasure in doing the act.' I replied that his pleasure might be less than that of his Master; but realizing it was pointless to reason with him, I turned to the crowd and argued with them. One replied that 'the woman had chosen to burn herself of her own free will and that she went to the pyre as if it were a source of joy.' --'Then why did you tie her down with that large bamboo?'--'If we hadn’t, she would have run away.'--'Run away from pleasure?' I then addressed the poor young man who had been manipulated into setting fire to his mother. He looked about nineteen. 'You have murdered your mother! Your sin is huge. The sin of the Brahmin who pushed you into it is even bigger; but yours is still very significant.'--'What could I do? It's the custom.'--'True, but this custom is not of God; it comes from the devil, who seeks to destroy humanity. How will you live with the fact that you've killed your only surviving parent?' He seemed to feel the weight of my words, but at that moment, the hardened wretch, the Brahmin, rushed in and dragged him away, even as tears filled his eyes. After reasoning with some others and telling them about the Savior of the world, I returned home, my mind filled with horror and disgust."
"You expect, perhaps, to hear that this unhappy victim was the wife of some Brahmman of high cast. She was the wife of a barber who dwelt at Serampore, and had died that morning, leaving the son I have mentioned, and a daughter about eleven years of age. Thus has this infernal superstition aggravated the common miseries of life, and left these children stripped of both their parents in one day! Nor is this an uncommon case. It often happens to children far more helpless than these; sometimes to children possessed of property, which is then left, as well as themselves, to the mercy of those who have decoyed their mother to their father's funeral pile." [84]
"You might expect to hear that this unfortunate victim was the wife of some high-caste Brahmin. She was actually the wife of a barber living in Serampore, and she passed away that morning, leaving behind the son I mentioned and a daughter around eleven years old. This cruel superstition has made the everyday struggles of life even worse, leaving these children without both parents in a single day! And this isn’t an isolated incident. It often happens to children who are even more vulnerable than they are; sometimes to kids who have property, which then gets left, along with them, at the mercy of those who lured their mother to their father's funeral pyre." [84]
CEYLON. "Idolatrous procession. Each carriage has four wheels of solid wood, and requires two hundred men to drag it. When they are dragged along the streets, on occasions of great solemnity, women, in the phrensy of false devotion, throw themselves down before the wheels, and are crushed to death by their tremendous weight; the same superstitious madness preventing the ignorant crowd from making any attempt to save them." [85]
CEYLON. "Idolatrous procession. Each carriage has four solid wood wheels and requires two hundred people to pull it. When these carriages are pulled through the streets during major ceremonies, women, in a frenzy of misguided devotion, throw themselves in front of the wheels and are crushed by their immense weight; the same superstitious madness stops the ignorant crowd from trying to rescue them." [85]
SUMATRA. "The modes of marriage," says Mr. Marsden, "according to the original institutions of these people, are by jujur, by arnbel anak, or by Semando. The jujur is a certain sum of money, given by one man to another, as a consideration for the person of his daughter, whose situation, in this case, differs not much from that of a slave to the man she marries, and to his family; his absolute property in her depends, however, upon some nice circumstances. Besides the botang jupu, (or main sum,) there are certain appendages, or branches, one of which, the tali kulo, or five dollars, is usually, from motives of delicacy or friendship, left unpaid; and so long as that is the case, a relationship is understood to subsist between the two families, and the parents of the woman have a right to interfere on occasions of ill treatment; the husband is also liable to be fined for wounding her: with other limitations of absolute right. When that sum is finally paid, which seldom happens but in cases of violent quarrel, the tali kulo, (tie of relationship,) is said to be putus, (broken,) and the woman becomes to all intents the slave of her lord. She has then no title to claim a divorce in any predicament; and he may sell her, making only the first offer to her relations."
SUMATRA. "The methods of marriage," says Mr. Marsden, "according to the original customs of these people, are by jujur, by arnbel anak, or by Semando. The jujur is a specific amount of money paid by one man to another as compensation for his daughter, whose situation in this case is not much different from that of a slave to her husband and his family; however, the man’s complete ownership of her depends on some subtle circumstances. In addition to the botang jupu (or main sum), there are certain additional amounts, one of which, the tali kulo, or five dollars, is usually left unpaid for reasons of delicacy or friendship; as long as that remains unpaid, a relationship is understood to exist between the two families, and the parents of the woman have the right to intervene in cases of mistreatment; the husband can also be fined for hurting her: with other limitations on absolute authority. When that sum is finally paid, which rarely occurs except in cases of serious disputes, the tali kulo (tie of relationship) is said to be putus (broken), and the woman essentially becomes the property of her husband. She then has no claim to a divorce under any circumstances; he may sell her, offering her relatives the first chance to buy her."
Speaking of another part of the country, (Batta,) he says, "the men are allowed to marry as many wives as they please or can afford, and to have half a dozen is not uncommon. The condition of the women appears to be no other than that of slaves, the husbands having the power of selling their wives and children." [86]
Speaking of another part of the country, (Batta,) he says, "men can marry as many wives as they want or can support, and having six isn't unusual. The situation for women seems to be no different from that of slaves, as husbands have the authority to sell their wives and children." [86]
JAVA. At Bantam, and in other parts of the island, fathers betroth their children at a very early age, lest they should be taken from them to supply the harems of kings, or be sold for slaves on the death of the fathers by the monarch, who is heir of all his subjects. [87]
JAVA. In Bantam and other areas of the island, fathers arrange marriages for their children at a very young age, to prevent them from being taken to fill the harems of kings or being sold into slavery after their fathers die, as the monarch inherits all his subjects. [87]
Among all the nations of Southern Asia, and the East Indian and South Sea Islands, the women are despised and oppressed; the wives and daughters of every class are offered to strangers, and compelled to prostitute themselves. They are moreover used with the utmost cruelty by their husbands, and not permitted to eat, or even to sit down, in the presence of the men; and yet, with marvellous inconsistency, many nations allow themselves to be governed by women, who sometimes reign with despotic authority.
Among all the countries in Southern Asia, as well as the East Indian and South Sea Islands, women are looked down upon and oppressed. The wives and daughters from all classes are given to strangers and forced into prostitution. They are treated with extreme cruelty by their husbands and aren't allowed to eat or even sit down in front of the men. Yet, in a remarkable contradiction, many nations allow women to govern, and they sometimes rule with absolute power.
NEW HOLLAND. "The aboriginal inhabitants of this distant region are, indeed, beyond comparison, the most barbarous on the surface of the globe. The residence of Europeans has been wholly ineffectual; the natives are still in the same state as at our first settlement. Every day are men and women to be seen in the streets of Sydney and Paramatta naked as in the moment of their birth. In vain have the more humane of the officers of the colony endeavoured to improve their condition: they still persist in the enjoyment of their ease and liberty in their own way, and turn a deaf ear to any advice upon this subject." [88]
NEW HOLLAND. "The native people of this remote area are, without a doubt, the most uncivilized on the planet. The presence of Europeans has had no real impact; the locals remain in the same condition as when we first arrived. Every day, men and women can be seen in the streets of Sydney and Parramatta completely naked, just as they were at birth. Efforts by the more compassionate officials of the colony to improve their situation have been in vain: they continue to enjoy their freedom and lifestyle on their own terms and ignore any suggestions regarding this issue." [88]
"They observe no particular ceremony in their marriages, though their mode of courtship is not without its singularity. When a young man sees a female to his fancy, he informs her she must accompany him home; the lady refuses; he not only enforces compliance with threats, but blows; thus the gallant, according to the custom, never fails to gain the victory, and bears off the willing, though struggling pugilist. The colonists, for some time, entertained the idea that the women were compelled, and forced away against their inclinations; but the young ladies informed them, that this mode of gallantry was the custom, and perfectly to their taste." [89]
"They don't follow any specific rituals for their marriages, but their way of dating is quite unique. When a young man sees a woman he likes, he tells her she has to come home with him; the woman refuses; he not only pressures her with threats but also with physical force; as a result, the suitor, following tradition, always wins and takes away his willing, albeit reluctant, companion. The colonists initially thought the women were being forced against their will, but the young ladies explained that this method of courtship was customary and completely to their liking." [89]
PERSIA. "Women are not allowed to join in the public prayers at the mosques. They are directed to offer up their devotions at home, or if they attend the place of public worship, it must be at a period when the male sex are not there. This practice is founded upon the authority of the traditionary sayings of the prophet, and is calculated to confirm that inferiority and seclusion, to which the female sex are doomed by the laws of Mahomed.
PERSIA. "Women are not allowed to participate in public prayers at the mosques. They are instructed to pray at home, or if they go to the mosque, it must be during times when men are not present. This practice is based on the traditional teachings of the prophet and is intended to reinforce the inferiority and seclusion that women are subjected to by the laws of Muhammad.
"In Persia, women are seldom publicly executed; nor can their crimes, from their condition in society, be often of a nature to demand such examples; but they are exposed to all the violence and injustice of domestic tyranny; and innocent females are too often included in the punishment of their husbands and fathers, particularly where those are of high rank. Instances frequently occur where women are tortured, to make them reveal the concealed wealth of which they are supposed to have a knowledge; and when a nobleman or minister is put to death, it is not unusual to give away his wives and daughters as slaves; and sometimes (though rarely) they are bestowed on the lowest classes in the community. There are instances of the wives of men of high rank being given to mule-drivers." [90]
"In Persia, women are rarely executed in public; nor are their crimes, given their position in society, often serious enough to warrant such actions. However, they endure all the violence and injustice of domestic oppression, and innocent women are too often punished alongside their husbands and fathers, especially when those men hold high status. It's common for women to be tortured to force them to disclose hidden wealth they are believed to know about; when a noble or minister is executed, it's not unusual for his wives and daughters to be given away as slaves, and sometimes (though rarely) they end up with the lowest classes in society. There are cases of the wives of high-ranking men being handed over to mule drivers." [90]
ARABIA. The ancient Arabs considered the birth of a daughter as a misfortune, and they frequently buried daughters alive as soon as they were born, lest they should be impoverished by having to provide for them, or should suffer disgrace on their account. [91]
ARABIA. The ancient Arabs viewed having a daughter as bad luck, and they often buried daughters alive right after they were born to avoid the expense of raising them or the shame that might come with it. [91]
"The horrid practice of female infanticide has been an usage of many nations. Among the ancient Arabs, as among the Rajpoots of the present day, it proceeded as much from a jealous sense of honour, as the pressure of want." [92]
"The terrible practice of female infanticide has been common in many nations. Among the ancient Arabs, just like the Rajputs today, it stemmed as much from a jealous sense of honor as from the pressure of poverty." [92]
Of eastern manners, in general, it has been remarked, that "excepting the Chinese and Javanese, all the nations of the south of Asia, and all the inhabitants of the East Indian and South Sea islands, offer the Europeans their wives and daughters, or compel them to prostitute themselves to strangers." [93]
Of eastern customs, it's been noted that "aside from the Chinese and Javanese, all the countries in southern Asia and all the people from the East Indian and South Sea islands, present their wives and daughters to Europeans or force them to sell themselves to strangers." [93]
"A man, in the East, dares not inquire concerning the health of the wife or daughter of his most intimate friend, because this would instantly excite suspicion of illicit views and connections; neither does etiquette permit him to make mention himself of his own wife or daughter. They are included among the domestic animals, or comprehended in the general denomination of the house or the family. When, however, an Oriental is obliged to mention his wife or his daughter, in conversation with a physician, or any other person whom he wishes to treat with deference and respect, he always introduces the subject with some such apology as we make in Europe, when we are obliged to speak of things which are regarded as disgusting or obscene. Conformably with this Asiatic prejudice, Tamerlane was highly affronted with the vanquished Turkish emperor Bajazet, for mentioning, in his presence, such impure creatures as women are considered by the Orientals." [94]
A man in the East doesn't dare to ask about the health of his close friend's wife or daughter, as that would immediately raise suspicions of inappropriate intentions or relationships. Etiquette also doesn't allow him to bring up his own wife or daughter. They are seen as part of the household, like pets, or simply referred to as family. However, when someone from the East has to mention his wife or daughter while talking to a doctor or anyone he wants to show respect to, he usually leads into the topic with an apology that we might use in Europe when discussing things that are seen as unpleasant or inappropriate. Reflecting this Asian bias, Tamerlane was deeply offended when the defeated Turkish emperor Bajazet mentioned women, as they're viewed as unclean by those in the Orient. [94]
America.
NORTHERN INDIANS.
Northerners.
Here all the gentle morals, such as play
Through life's more cultur'd walks, and charm the way;
These far dispers'd, on tim'rous pinions fly,
To sport and flutter in a kinder sky.
Here, all the gentle morals, like playful breezes
Flow through life's more refined paths and make the journey enjoyable;
These are scattered far and wide, flying on timid wings,
To frolic and flutter in a friendlier sky.
GOLDSMITH.
JEWELER.
The women cook the victuals, but though of the highest rank, they are never permitted to partake of it, till all the males, even the servants, have eaten what they think proper; and in times of scarcity, it is frequently their lot to be left without a single morsel; and should they be detected in helping themselves during the business of cookery, they would be subject to a severe beating; and be considered afterward, through life, as having forfeited their character.
The women prepare the food, but even though they are of the highest rank, they are never allowed to eat until all the males, including the servants, have eaten what they want. During times of scarcity, they often end up with nothing to eat at all. If they are caught taking food for themselves while cooking, they would face a harsh beating and would be seen as having lost their reputation for the rest of their lives.
"The accounts we have had of the effects of the small pox on that nation (the Maha Indians) are most distressing; it is not known in what way it was first communicated to them, though probably by some war party. They had been a military and powerful people; but when these warriors saw their strength wasting before a malady which they could not resist, their phrensy was extreme; they burnt their village, and many of them put to death their wives and children, to save them from so cruel an affliction, and that all might go together to some better country." [95]
"The reports we’ve received about the impact of smallpox on the Maha Indians are truly heartbreaking. It's unclear how the disease first reached them, though it likely came through a war party. They had been a strong and formidable people, but when their warriors witnessed their strength fading in the face of an unstoppable illness, their rage was overwhelming. They set their village on fire, and many of them killed their wives and children to spare them from such a cruel fate, wanting everyone to leave together for a better place." [95]
WEST INDIES. Hayti (late St. Domingo.) Extract of a letter, dated Nov. 1810. "The Indigenes, or natives of Hayti, are extremely ignorant; but few can read: their religion is Catholic; but neither it, or its priests, are much respected. That they are in a most awful state of darkness, is but too evident: mothers are actually panders to their own daughters, and reap the fruit of their prostitution. The endearing name of father is scarcely ever heard, as the children but rarely know to whom they are indebted for existence." [96]
WEST INDIES. Haiti (formerly St. Domingo.) Extract of a letter, dated Nov. 1810. "The natives of Haiti are extremely uneducated; very few can read. Their religion is Catholic, but neither it nor its priests are held in much regard. It’s painfully clear that they live in a terrible state of ignorance: mothers actually encourage their own daughters to engage in prostitution and benefit from it. The affectionate term 'father' is hardly ever heard, as children rarely know who is responsible for their existence." [96]
SOUTH AMERICA. In this region there are whole nations of cannibals, who devour their captives. Sometimes they slay their own wives, and invite their neighbours to the repast.
SOUTH AMERICA. In this region, there are entire nations of cannibals who eat their captives. Sometimes they kill their own wives and invite their neighbors to the feast.
NEW ZEALAND. "Tippechu, the chieftain," says Mr. Savage, "has a well-constructed dwelling on this island, and a large collection of spears, war-mail, and other valuables. A short distance, from the residence of the chief is an edifice, every way similar to a dove-cote, standing upon a single post, and not larger than dove-cotes usually are. In this, Tippechu confined one of his daughters several years; we understood she had fallen in love with a person of inferior condition, and that these means were adopted to prevent her from bringing disgrace upon her family. The space alloted to the lady would neither allow of her standing up, or stretching at her length; she had a trough, in which her food was deposited as often as was thought necessary, during her confinement; and I could not find that she was allowed any other accommodation. These privations, and all converse being denied her, proves that Tippechu was determined to exhibit a severe example to his subjects; at least to such of the young ladies of this part of New Zealand, as might be inclined to degrade themselves and their families by unsuitable alliances. The long confinement with all its inconveniences, produced the desired effect, in rendering the princess obedient to the wishes of her royal parent. This barbarous case, which is ornamented with much grotesque carving, still remains as a memento in terrorem to all the young ladies under Tippechu's government." [97]
NEW ZEALAND. "Tippechu, the chief," says Mr. Savage, "has a well-built house on this island, along with a large collection of spears, armor, and other valuables. Not far from the chief's home is a structure, similar to a dove-cote, standing on a single post, and about the same size as typical dove-cotes. In this, Tippechu kept one of his daughters for several years; we learned she had fallen in love with someone of lower status, and these measures were taken to prevent her from bringing shame to her family. The space allocated to her didn’t allow her to stand or lie down comfortably; there was a trough for her food, which was given to her as often as deemed necessary during her confinement, and I found no evidence that she was given any other comfort. These deprivations, along with the complete lack of conversation, demonstrate that Tippechu was determined to set a harsh example for his subjects; especially for the young women in this part of New Zealand who might be tempted to dishonor themselves and their families with inappropriate relationships. The lengthy confinement, with all its hardships, had the desired effect of making the princess obedient to her father's wishes. This cruel case, adorned with much elaborate carving, still serves as a warning to all young women under Tippechu's rule." [97]
Africa.
TUNIS. "The Tunisines have a curious custom of fattening up their young ladies for marriage. A girl, after she is betrothed, is cooped up in a small room; shackles of silver and gold are put upon her ancles and wrists, as a piece of dress. If she is to be married to a man who has discharged, despatched, or lost a former wife, the shackles which the former wife wore, are put upon the new bride's limbs: and she is fed, until they are filled up to the proper thickness. This is sometimes no easy matter, particularly if the former wife was fat, and the present should be of a slender form. The food used for this custom, worthy of barbarians, is a seed called drough; which is of an extraordinary fattening quality, and also famous for rendering the milk of nurses rich and abundant. With this seed, and their national dish 'cuscusu,' the bride is literally crammed, and many actually die under the spoon." [98]
TUNIS. "The Tunisians have a strange tradition of fattening up their young women for marriage. Once a girl is engaged, she is confined to a small room; silver and gold shackles are placed on her ankles and wrists as part of her attire. If she is marrying a man who has lost a previous wife, the shackles worn by the former wife are put on the new bride. She is then fed until she reaches the desired size. This can be quite challenging, especially if the previous wife was heavy and the new bride is slim. The food used for this barbaric custom is a seed called drough, which is known for its exceptional fattening properties and for making a nurse's milk rich and plentiful. With this seed and their national dish 'cuscusu,' the bride is literally stuffed, and many actually die from overeating." [98]
MOROCCO. "When an ill-disposed husband becomes jealous or discontented with his wife, he has too many opportunities of treating her cruelly; he may tyrannize over her without control; no one can go to her assistance, for no one is authorized to enter his harem without permission. Jealousy or hatred rises so high in the breast of a Moor, that death is often the consequence to the wretched female, who has excited, perhaps innocently, the anger of her husband. A father, however fond of his daughter, cannot assist her even if informed of the ill treatment she suffers; the husband alone is lord paramount; if, however, he should he convicted of murdering his wife, he would suffer death; but this is difficult to ascertain, even should she bear the marks of his cruelty or dastardly conduct, for who is to detect it? Instances have been known, when the woman has been cruelly beaten and put to death, and the parents have been informed of her decease as if it had been occasioned by sickness, and she has been buried accordingly; but this difficulty of bringing men to justice, holds only among the powerful bashaws, and persons in the highest stations; and these, to avoid a retaliation of similar practices on their children, sometimes prefer giving their daughters in marriage to men of an inferior station in life, who are more amenable to justice." [99]
MOROCCO. "When a jealous or unhappy husband feels upset with his wife, he has too many chances to treat her badly; he can control her without limits. No one can come to her aid because no one is allowed to enter his harem without his permission. Jealousy or hatred can build up so intensely in a Moor that it often leads to death for the unfortunate woman, who may have unintentionally angered her husband. Even a father who loves his daughter can’t help her if he learns about the mistreatment she endures; the husband is the ultimate authority. If he is found guilty of murdering his wife, he would face the death penalty, but proving this is very difficult, even if she shows signs of his abuse, because who is there to identify it? There have been cases where women were brutally beaten and killed, and their parents were told that she had died from illness, leading to her burial under those circumstances. However, this difficulty in bringing men to justice mostly affects powerful officials and those in high positions; to avoid similar retaliation against their own children, they sometimes choose to marry their daughters off to men of lower status, who are more likely to be held accountable." [99]
This writer informs us also, that "in Morocco, slaves are placed in the public market-place, and there turned about and examined, in order to ascertain their value." p. 249. "A young girl of Houssa, of exquisite beauty, was once sold at Morocco, whilst I was there, for four hundred ducats [of 3s. 8d. sterling,] whilst the average price of slaves is about one hundred; so much depends on the fancy or the imagination of the purchaser." p. 247.
This writer tells us that "in Morocco, slaves are displayed in the public marketplace, where they are turned around and examined to determine their value." p. 249. "A young girl from Houssa, who was incredibly beautiful, was sold in Morocco while I was there for four hundred ducats [of 3s. 8d. sterling], while the average price of slaves is about one hundred; it all depends on the buyer's preference or imagination." p. 247.
DARFOR. "Slaves indeed, both male and female, rarely draw near their master, if he be seated, except creeping on their knees. A man, who is possessed of several women, rarely enters the apartments of any of them, hut sends for one or more of them at a time to his own. Whether free or slaves, they enter it on their knees, and with indications of timidity and respect.... The slaves are rarely allowed to wear any covering on their feet. Free women, on the contrary, are ordinarily distinguished by a kind of sandal; which, however, is always taken off when they come into the presence of, or have occasion to pass, a person of any consideration of the other sex. It is not uncommon to see a man on a journey, mounted idly on an ass; whilst his wife is pacing many a weary step on foot behind him; and moreover, perhaps, carrying a supply of provisions or culinary utensils. Yet it is not to be supposed, that the man is despotic in his house; the voice of the female has its full weight." [100]
DARFOR. "Slaves, both men and women, rarely approach their master when he’s sitting, unless they crawl on their knees. A man who has several women usually doesn’t visit their rooms; instead, he calls for one or more of them at a time to come to him. Whether free or enslaved, they enter on their knees and show signs of shyness and respect. Slaves are hardly ever allowed to wear anything on their feet. In contrast, free women usually wear a type of sandal, but they take it off when they enter the presence of, or pass by, any notable man. It’s common to see a man traveling lazily on a donkey while his wife walks many exhausting steps behind him, possibly carrying food or cooking utensils. However, that doesn’t mean the man is tyrannical in his home; the woman's voice holds significant influence." [100]
MANDINGOES. "About noon," says Mr. Park, "I arrived at Kolor, a considerable town; near the entrance into which I observed, hanging upon a tree, a sort of masquerade habit, made of the bark of trees; which, I was told on inquiry, belonged to MUMBO JUMBO. This is a strange bugbear, common to all the Mandingo towns, and much employed by the Pagan natives in keeping their women in subjection; for as the Kafas are not restricted in the number of their wives, every one marries as many as he can conveniently maintain; and as it frequently happens that the ladies disagree among themselves, family quarrels sometimes rise to such a height, that the authority of the husband can no longer preserve peace in his household. In such cases, the interposition of Mumbo Jumbo is called in and is always decisive.
MANDINGOES. "Around noon," says Mr. Park, "I arrived at Kolor, a notable town; near the entrance, I noticed a type of masquerade costume, made from tree bark, hanging from a tree. When I asked about it, I was told it belonged to MUMBO JUMBO. This is a mysterious figure, common to all the Mandingo towns, and is often used by the Pagan locals to keep their women in line; since the Kafas are not limited in the number of wives they can have, each man marries as many as he can support. When tensions arise among the wives, family disputes can escalate to the point where the husband’s authority fails to maintain peace in the home. In such situations, the intervention of Mumbo Jumbo is sought, and it is always effective."
"This strange minister of justice (who is supposed to be either the husband himself, or some person instructed by him,) disguised in the dress that has been mentioned, and armed with the rod of public authority, announces his coming (whenever his services are required) by loud and dismal screams in the woods near the town. He begins the pantomime at the approach of night; and, as soon as it is dark, he enters the town, and proceeds to the Bentang, at which all the inhabitants immediately assemble.
"This odd justice minister (who is meant to be either the husband himself or someone he sent) dresses in the outfit mentioned earlier and, wielding the power of public authority, announces his arrival (whenever he’s needed) with loud, eerie screams in the woods near the town. He starts this act at nightfall, and as soon as it gets dark, he enters the town and heads to the Bentang, where all the residents quickly gather."
"It may easily be supposed, that this exhibition is not much relished by the women; for as the person in disguise is entirely unknown to them, every married female suspects that the visit may possibly be intended for herself: but they dare not refuse to appear, when they are summoned; and the ceremony commences with songs and dances, which continue till midnight, about which time Mumbo fixes on the offender. This unfortunate victim being thereupon immediately seized, is stripped naked, tied to a post, and severely scourged with Mumbo's rod, amidst the shouts and derision of the whole assembly; and it is remarkable, that the rest of the women are the loudest in their exclamations on this occasion against their unhappy sister. Daylight puts an end to this indecent and unmanly revel." [101]
"It can easily be assumed that the women don't really enjoy this event; since the person in disguise is completely unknown to them, every married woman worries that the visit might be aimed at her. However, they can't refuse to show up when called. The ceremony starts with songs and dances that go on until midnight, around the time when Mumbo identifies the offender. This unfortunate victim is then immediately captured, stripped naked, tied to a post, and harshly whipped with Mumbo's rod, while the entire crowd shouts and mocks her. It's notable that the other women are the loudest in their outcry against their unfortunate sister. Daylight finally brings an end to this indecent and cowardly celebration." [101]
"In the Mandingo countries," says Durand, "there is a mosque in every town, from the steeple of which the people are called to prayers, the same as in Turkey. Polygamy is practised in these regions in its utmost latitude. The women are frequently hostages for alliance and peace; and the chiefs of two tribes, who have been at war, cement their treaties by an exchange of their daughters: private individuals do the same; and this circumstance may be the reason why the chiefs, in particular, have such a great number of women. A girl is frequently betrothed to a man as soon as she is born. On the day agreed on for the marriage, the bridegroom places on the road which the bride has to pass, several of his people at different distances, with brandy and other refreshments; for if these articles be not furnished in abundance, the conductors of the bride will not advance a step further, though they may have got three parts of the way on their journey. On approaching the town, they stop, and are joined by the friends of the bridegroom, who testify their joy by shouting, drinking, and letting off their pieces." [102]
"In the Mandingo countries," Durand says, "there's a mosque in every town, from the steeple of which the people are called to prayers, just like in Turkey. Polygamy is widely practiced in these areas. Women are often used as hostages for alliances and peace; chiefs of two tribes that have been at war solidify their treaties by exchanging their daughters: individuals do the same; and this might explain why the chiefs, in particular, have so many wives. A girl is often promised to a man as soon as she’s born. On the agreed wedding day, the groom sets up several of his people at different points along the bride's route, offering brandy and other refreshments; if these aren’t provided in large quantities, the bride's party won’t move forward, even if they’re already three-quarters of the way there. As they near the town, they stop and are joined by the groom's friends, who show their excitement by shouting, drinking, and firing their guns." [102]
MOORS OF BENOROM, &c. "The education of the girls is neglected altogether: mental accomplishments are but little attended to by the women; nor is the want of them considered, by the men, as a defect in the female character. They are regarded, I believe, as an inferior species of animals; and seem to be brought up for no other purpose, than that of administering to the sensual pleasures of their imperious masters. Voluptuousness is, therefore, considered as their chief accomplishment, and slavish submission as their indispensable duty." [103]
MOORS OF BENOROM, &c. "The education of girls is completely overlooked: the women hardly focus on mental skills; and the men don’t see a lack of them as a flaw in women's character. They are viewed, I think, as an inferior kind of being; and it seems they are raised solely to cater to the desires of their demanding masters. Therefore, being sensual is seen as their main skill, and obedient submission is viewed as their unavoidable duty." [103]
KAMALIA. "If a man takes a fancy to any one [of the young women,] it is not considered as absolutely necessary, that he should make an overture to the girl herself. The first object is to agree with the parents, concerning the recompense to be given them for the loss of the company and services of their daughter. The value of two slaves is a common price, unless the girl is thought very handsome; in which case, the parents will raise their demand very considerably. If the lover is rich enough and willing to give the sum demanded, he then communicates his wishes to the damsel; but her consent is, by no means, necessary to the match; for if the parents agree to it, and eat a few kolla-nuts, which are presented by the suiter as an earnest of the bargain, the young lady must either have the man of their choice, or continue unmarried, for she cannot after be given to another. If the parents should attempt it, the lover is then authorized, by the laws of the country, to seize upon the girl as his slave.
KAMALIA. "If a man takes a liking to any of the young women, it’s not seen as absolutely necessary for him to approach the girl directly. The first step is to reach an agreement with her parents regarding the compensation for the loss of their daughter’s company and services. Typically, the going price is the value of two slaves, unless the girl is considered very attractive; in that case, the parents will significantly increase their demand. If the suitor is wealthy enough and willing to meet the asked price, he will then express his intentions to the girl, but her agreement isn’t really needed for the match to happen; if the parents agree and share a few kolla nuts, which the suitor presents as a sign of the deal, the young lady has to either accept the man they chose or remain unmarried, as she cannot be given to someone else afterward. If the parents try to do so, the lover is legally allowed, under the country’s laws, to take the girl as his slave."
"The negroes, whether Mahomedan or Pagan, allow a plurality of wives. The Mahomedans alone are, by their religion, confined to four; and as the husband commonly pays a great price for each, he requires from all of them the utmost deference and submission, and beats them more like hired servants than companions." [104]
"The Black people, whether Muslim or Pagan, practice having multiple wives. Only the Muslims are limited to four by their religion, and since the husband typically pays a significant amount for each wife, he expects total respect and obedience from them, treating them more like hired help than partners." [104]
BANISERILE. "One of our slatus was a native of this place, from which he had been absent three years. This man invited me to go with him to his house; at the gate of which his friends met him with many expressions of joy, shaking hands with him, embracing him, and singing and dancing before him. As soon as he had seated himself upon a mat, by the threshold of his door, a young woman (his intended bride) brought a little water in a calabash, and kneeling down before him, desired him to wash his hands; when he had done this, the girl, with a tear of joy sparkling in her eyes, drank the water; this being considered as the greatest proof she could possibly give him of her fidelity and attachment." [105]
BANISERILE. "One of our group was originally from this area, where he hadn’t been for three years. He invited me to his home; at the gate, his friends greeted him with lots of excitement, shaking hands, hugging him, and singing and dancing around him. Once he settled on a mat by his door, a young woman (his future bride) brought a little water in a calabash, knelt in front of him, and asked him to wash his hands; after he did this, the girl, with a joyful tear in her eye, drank the water, which was seen as the greatest sign of her loyalty and love." [105]
THE KAFFERS. The principal article of their trade with the Tambookie nation, is the exchange of cattle for their young women. Almost every chief has Tambookie wives, though they pay much dearer for them than for those of their own people. Polygamy is allowed in its fullest extent, and without any inconvenience resulting from the practice, as it is confined nearly to the chiefs. The circumstances of the common people will rarely allow them the indulgence of more than one wife, as women are not to be obtained without purchase. The females being considered as the property of their parents, are invariably disposed of by sale. The common price of a wife is an ox, or a couple of cows. Love with them is a very confined passion, taking but little hold on the mind. When an offer is made for the purchase of a daughter, she feels little inclination to refuse; she considers herself as an article in the market, and is neither surprised, nor unhappy, nor interested, on being told that she is about to be disposed of. There is no previous courtship, no exchange of fine sentiments, no nice feelings, nor little kind attentions, which catch the affections and attach the heart. [106]
THE KAFFERS. The main item in their trade with the Tambookie nation is trading cattle for their young women. Almost every chief has Tambookie wives, although they pay a lot more for them than for women from their own people. Polygamy is completely accepted, and it doesn’t cause any issues since it mainly involves the chiefs. The average person usually can't afford more than one wife since women must be bought. Women are seen as the property of their parents and are typically sold off. The usual price for a wife is an ox or a couple of cows. For them, love is a very limited emotion and doesn't occupy their minds much. When someone makes an offer to buy a daughter, she feels little reason to refuse; she views herself as a commodity and is neither surprised, nor unhappy, nor concerned when told that she’s about to be sold. There’s no courtship, no sharing of sweet words, no deep feelings, or small gestures that build affection and connect hearts. [106]
THE PEOPLE OF SNEUWBERG, GRAAFF REGNET, "The only grievance of which I ever heard them complain," says Mr. Barrow, "and which appears to be a real inconvenience to all who inhabit the remote parts of the colony, is a ridiculous and absurd law respecting marriage: and as it seems to have no foundation in reason, and little in policy, except, indeed, like the marriage-acts in other countries, it be intended as a check to population, it ought to be repealed. By this law, the parties are both obliged to be present at the Cape, in order to answer certain interrogatories, and pass the forms of office there, the chief intention of which seems to be that of preventing improper marriages from being contracted; as if the commissaries appointed to this office, at the distance of five or six hundred miles, should be better acquainted with the connexions and other circumstances regarding the parties; than the landrost, the clergyman, and the members of the council residing upon the spot. The expense of the journey to the young couple is greater than they can frequently well afford. For decency's sake they must set out in two wagons, though in the course of a month's journey across a desert country, it is said they generally make one serve the purpose; the consequence of which is, that nine times out of ten the consummation of the marriage precedes the ceremony. This naturally produces another bad effect. The poor girl, after the familiarities of a long journey, lies entirely at the mercy of the man, who, having satisfied his curiosity or his passion, sometimes deserts her before their arrival at the altar; and it has sometimes happened, that the lady has repented of her choice in the course of the journey, and driven home again in her own wagon. Though, in our own country, a trip to Scotland be sometimes taken, when obstacles at a nearer distance could not safely be surmounted, yet it would be considered as a very ridiculous, as well as vexatious law, that should oblige the parties intending to marry, to proceed from the Laud's End to London to carry their purpose into execution. The inhabitants of Graaff Regnet must travel twice that distance, in order to be married." [107]
THE PEOPLE OF SNEUWBERG, GRAAFF REGNET, "The only complaint I’ve ever heard them make," says Mr. Barrow, "and which seems to be a real hassle for everyone living in the more distant parts of the colony, is a silly and unreasonable law about marriage: and since it appears to have no basis in logic and little in policy, except, like the marriage laws in other countries, to act as a limit on population, it should be repealed. According to this law, both parties must be present at the Cape to answer certain questions and complete the necessary formalities there, with the main goal appearing to be to stop inappropriate marriages from happening; as if the officials assigned to this job, located five or six hundred miles away, know the connections and situations of the couples better than the local landrost, the clergyman, and the council members residing in the area. The cost of the trip for the young couple is often more than they can afford. For the sake of appearance, they are required to set out in two wagons, although during a month-long journey across a desert, they typically end up using just one; which often means that nine times out of ten, the marriage is consummated before the official ceremony. This naturally leads to another negative effect. The poor girl, after the close interactions of a long journey, finds herself completely at the man's mercy, who, after satisfying his curiosity or desire, sometimes abandons her before they reach the altar; and it has been known for the woman to regret her decision during the journey and return home in her own wagon. Although in our own country, a trip to Scotland is sometimes necessary when closer obstacles can’t be managed, it would be seen as a ridiculous and annoying law that would require couples intending to marry to travel from Land's End to London to get married. The people of Graaff Regnet have to travel twice that distance to tie the knot." [107]
NEGRO NATIONS. "It is a practice equally, nay, perhaps still more common among the negroes than among the Americans, to offer their wives and daughters to Europeans." [108] "Parents sell their daughters not only to lovers, but to suiters of any kind, without doubting or even asking their consent. The negroes in general, receive for their daughters a few bottles of brandy, and at the furthest, a few articles of wearing apparel; and when these prices are paid, the fathers conduct their willing children to the huts of the purchasers." [109] "A negro may love his wife with all the affection that is possible for a negro to possess, but he never permits her to eat with him, because he would imagine himself contaminated, or his dignity lessened, by such a condescension; and at this degrading distance, the very negro-slaves in the West Indies keep their wives, though it might be presumed that the hardships of their common lot would have tended to unite them in the closest manner." [110] "The poorest and meanest negro, even though he be a slave, is generally waited upon by his wife as by a subordinate being, on her knees. On their knees the negro women are obliged to present to their husbands tobacco and drink; on their knees they salute them when they return from hunting, or any other expedition; lastly, on their knees, they drive away the flies from their lords and masters while they sleep." [111]
NEGRO NATIONS. "It’s a practice just as common, if not more so, among Black people than among Americans to offer their wives and daughters to Europeans." [108] "Parents sell their daughters not just to lovers, but to any suitor, without questioning or even seeking their consent. Generally, Black people receive a few bottles of brandy and, at most, a few pieces of clothing for their daughters; and once these payments are made, the fathers take their compliant children to the buyers’ homes." [109] "A Black man may love his wife with all the affection he can muster, but he never allows her to eat with him, as he would think himself degraded or his dignity diminished by such an act of affection; and at this belittling distance, even Black slaves in the West Indies maintain this separation, though one might assume that the shared hardships of their lives would bring them closer." [110] "The poorest and lowest-ranking Black man, even if he is a slave, is typically served by his wife as though she is an inferior being, on her knees. On their knees, Black women are expected to present their husbands with tobacco and drinks; on their knees, they greet them when they return from hunting or other outings; and lastly, on their knees, they shoo away the flies from their lords and masters while they sleep." [111]
GAGERS. Various writers of credit and veracity report, that in the southern portion of Africa, many princes and chieftains keep great numbers of young girls, not merely to gratify their passions, but to satiate their tigerlike appetite for human flesh. In order to convince ourselves, that the fate of the black women of Africa is not less severe than the condition of the brown females of the American continent, it is sufficient to state, that among the negro-women, to whom Cavazzi administered baptism, some acknowledged with tears that they had killed five, others seven, and others again ten children, with their own hands. Notwithstanding the despotic authority of the legislatrix of the Gagers, she was unable, even by the strictest prohibition, to restrain her warriors from regaling themselves with the flesh of women. Rich and powerful chieftains continued to keep whole flocks of young girls, as they would of lambs, calves, or any other animals, and had some of them daily slaughtered for the table; for the Gagers prefer human flesh to every other species of animal food, and among the different classes of human kind, they hold that of young females in particular estimation. [112]
GAGERS. Various credible writers report that in the southern part of Africa, many princes and chiefs keep many young girls, not just to satisfy their passions, but to fulfill their brutal craving for human flesh. To understand that the fate of black women in Africa is as harsh as that of brown women in the Americas, it’s enough to mention that among the Black women whom Cavazzi baptized, some admitted tearfully that they had killed five, others seven, and some even ten children with their own hands. Despite the strict authority of the ruler over the Gagers, she could not stop her warriors from indulging in the flesh of women. Rich and powerful chiefs continued to keep entire groups of young girls, just as they would with lambs, calves, or other animals, and had some of them slaughtered daily for meals; for the Gagers prefer human flesh to any other kind of meat, especially valuing that of young females. [112]
III. PATRIARCHAL TIMES, AND THE PERIOD OF THE JEWISH THEOCRACY, require a brief examination, as a necessary means of elucidating the general subject.
III. PATRIARCHAL TIMES, AND THE PERIOD OF THE JEWISH THEOCRACY, require a brief examination, as a necessary means of clarifying the general subject.
Having already, in the preceding inquiries, ascended to an early date, and traced the condition of women through a long series of historic record to the present age, it may seem an imperfection in the plan to conduct the reader back to a still more remote antiquity than has hitherto been noticed; but this arrangement will be allowed, perhaps, to be founded in propriety, upon observing that the design was first to exhibit a complete series of illustrations, derived from a view of the circumstances of mankind as destitute of the light of revelation, and then to compare the condition of the female sex under the influence of a precursory and imperfect system of the true religion, with their actual state, or with the privileges secured to them by the nobler manifestations of CHRISTIANITY. By this mode of conducting the argument we trace the great epochs in the history of female melioration: the glory of woman appears at first eclipsed, as behind a dark cloud, which the passions of a degenerate race had interposed to hide and debase her: she then emerges, though partially, to view, through the mists and obscurities of a temporary dispensation, adapting itself to the circumstances of mankind as they then existed, but unsuited to what they were destined to become--till at length, "fair as the moon," ascending to the noon of her glory, and tinging with the mildness of her beam every earthly object, woman attains her undisputed eminence, and diffuses her benignant influence in society.
Having already examined an early date in the previous inquiries and traced the condition of women through a long series of historical records to the present age, it may seem like a flaw in the plan to take the reader back to an even more distant past than what has been covered. However, this approach might be considered appropriate since the goal was first to provide a complete series of illustrations based on the circumstances of humanity as devoid of the light of revelation, and then to compare the condition of women under the influence of an incomplete system of the true religion with their current state, or with the rights secured to them by the higher expressions of CHRISTIANITY. By following this structure in the argument, we can trace the important milestones in the history of women's improvement: the glory of women initially appears overshadowed, as if behind a dark cloud cast by the passions of a declining society that sought to hide and diminish her. She then partially re-emerges through the mists and uncertainties of a temporary system, adapting to the circumstances of humanity as they existed then, but not fitting what they were meant to become—until finally, "fair as the moon," she rises to the peak of her glory, illuminating every earthly object with her gentle light, and woman achieves her undisputed prominence and spreads her positive influence throughout society.
Were we to attach entire credit to the pleasing descriptions of the muses, we must admit, that the earliest ages of the world deserved the epithet of "golden" as exhibiting man devoid of those artificial wants which refinement and luxury have superinduced, and divested of those violent prejudices, that selfishness and that arrogance, which have filled the cup of human wo to the brim: we should see him inhabiting a tent of the simplest construction, furnishing himself with necessary subsistence with his own hands, sharing with his companion the services of domestic life, breathing the very soul of hospitality, and adorned with the most attractive manners: we should even see princes and princesses devoting themselves to what we are accustomed to denominate the menial offices both of husbandry and house-keeping, but without any sense of degradation in the one sex, or any tyrannical assumption in the other.
If we were to fully believe the appealing descriptions of the muses, we would have to agree that the earliest ages of the world truly deserve the title "golden." Those times showcased humans free from the artificial desires created by refinement and luxury, and stripped of the strong prejudices, selfishness, and arrogance that have filled the cup of human suffering to overflowing. We would see them living in the simplest tents, providing for their basic needs with their own hands, sharing domestic responsibilities with their companions, embracing the spirit of hospitality, and displaying the most charming manners. We would even witness princes and princesses engaged in what we now consider menial tasks of farming and household management, but without any feeling of shame for one gender or any oppressive sense of superiority from the other.
The authority of the sacred writings also upon this point is express and decisive. The most distinguished of the human race were, in patriarchal times, devoted to rural occupations and to plain habits; and it is not easy, nor is it altogether desirable, to divest oneself of those feelings of enchantment which the view of such scenes and manners naturally inspires. Who can remain unaffected at the recital of the story of an Abraham, running to the herd and fetching a young and tender calf to refresh his angelic visiters; or at the various memorable instances of simplicity that occur in the stories of Isaac, Jacob, and their contemporaries?
The authority of the sacred writings on this matter is clear and decisive. The most notable people in history, during patriarchal times, were devoted to farming and simple lifestyles; and it’s not easy, nor is it entirely appealing, to shake off the feelings of wonder that the sight of such scenes and ways of life naturally inspires. Who can remain untouched by the story of Abraham, rushing to the herd to bring back a young, tender calf for his angelic visitors? Or by the memorable examples of simplicity found in the stories of Isaac, Jacob, and their contemporaries?
But the question is, whether the actual condition of women did or did not indicate the lordly views of their husbands, and a general state of slavish subordination? What can be said to the practices of polygamy and concubinage, which prevailed even in these golden times and in pious families? Do they evince any proper estimate of the character of women? or have they not an evident tendency to degrade them? Does not their very institution assert the subserviency of the one sex to the will and pleasure of the other? [113] The state of women may not only be inferred under such circumstances, but is clearly seen. Wives possessed no other advantages over concubines than the right of inheriting; and domestic unions were formed without any reference to the nobler felicities of social intercourse. Hence infertility not only excited dislike, but was held to justify repudiation. In the earliest ages, marriage was not only very unceremonious with regaird to the mode in which it was conducted, but this important union was arranged without any previous agreement between the parties, and wives were often purchased. Men had the right of annulling all the oaths and engagements of their daughters and wives, if they had, not been present when they were contracted. "We can discover," says Segur, "in these first ages, nothing worthy of the title of 'golden,' which has been applied to them. Abraham and Isaac were continually afraid of being assassinated for their wives; and the oath which they enacted from their neighbours not to attempt their lives, savoured little of a golden age."
But the question is whether the actual situation of women reflected the controlling attitudes of their husbands and a general state of submissiveness. What can we say about the practices of polygamy and concubinage, which were common even in these supposedly golden times and in religious families? Do they show any real respect for the character of women? Or do they not clearly tend to degrade them? Doesn't their very existence imply the subservience of one sex to the will and desires of the other? [113] The condition of women can not only be inferred in such situations but is also clearly evident. Wives had no other advantages over concubines apart from the right to inherit; and domestic unions were formed without regard for the more fulfilling aspects of social interaction. As a result, infertility not only caused discontent but was seen as a justification for divorce. In the earliest ages, marriage was not only very casual in terms of how it was conducted, but this important union was arranged without any prior consent from the parties involved, and wives were often bought. Men had the authority to nullify all the promises and commitments made by their daughters and wives if they had not been present at the time they were made. "We can discover," says Segur, "in these early ages, nothing deserving of the title of 'golden,' which has been applied to them. Abraham and Isaac were constantly afraid of being killed for their wives; and the oath they demanded from their neighbors not to attempt their lives hardly reflects a golden age."
Under the Jewish theocracy the Levitical law appointed a variety of regulations which evinced their imperfect emancipation from a state of inferiority. They were in particular subjected to the trial of the waters of jealousy, not only in cases of real departure from conjugal fidelity, but when a suspicion existed in the mind of the husband, even though it were without any foundation: and there were cases in which misconduct of a similar natute exposed them to be stoned to death. The doctrine of vows also, in the cases of daughters, wives, and widows, corroborates the general argument, by evincing the marked subordination of the woman to the man. "If a woman also vow a vow unto the Lord, and bind herself by a bond, being in her father's house in her youth; and her father hear her vow, and her bond wherewith she hath bound her soul, and her father shall hold his peace at her: then all her vows shall stand, and every bond wherewith she hath bound her soul shall stand. But if her father disallow her in the day that he heareth; not any of her vows, or of her bonds, wherewith she hath bound her soul, shall stand: and the Lord shall forgive her, because her father disallowed her. And if she had at all an husband, when she vowed, or uttered aught out of her lips, wherewith she bound her soul; and her husband heard it, and held his peace at her in the day that he heard it: then her vows shall stand, and her bonds wherewith she bound her soul shall stand. But if her husband disallowed her on the day that he heard it; then he shall make her vow which she vowed, and that which she uttered with her lips, wherewith she bound her soul, of none effect: and the Lord shall forgive her. But every vow of a widow, and of her that is divorced, wherewith they have bound their souls, shall stand against her. And if she vowed in her husband's house, or bound her soul by a bond with an oath; and her husband heard it, and held his peace at her, and disallowed her not: then all her vows shall stand, and every bond wherewith she bound her soul shall stand. But if her husband hath utterly made them void on the day he heard them; then whatsoever proceeded out of her lips concerning her vows, or concerning the bond of her soul, shall not stand: her husband hath made them void; and the Lord shall forgive her. Every vow, and every binding oath to afflict the soul, her husband may establish it, or her husband may make it void. But if her husband altogether hold his peace at her from day to day; then he establisheth all her vows, or all her bonds, which are upon her: he confirmeth them, because he held his peace at her in the day that he heard them. But if he shall any ways make them void after that he hath heard them, then he shall bear her iniquity."
Under the Jewish theocracy, the Levitical law set many rules that showed their incomplete freedom from a sense of inferiority. They were especially subjected to the trial of the waters of jealousy, not just in cases of actual infidelity but also when a husband suspected infidelity, even without any real evidence. There were situations where similar misconduct could lead to them being stoned to death. The rules about vows, concerning daughters, wives, and widows, further highlight the clear subordination of women to men. "If a woman makes a vow to the Lord and commits herself by a promise while she is living in her father's house as a young girl; and her father hears her vow and her commitment but does not say anything to her, then all her vows will remain valid, and every commitment she has made will stand. But if her father disallows her on the day he hears it, none of her vows or commitments will count; the Lord will forgive her because her father rejected her. If she is married when she makes a vow or speaks a commitment, and her husband hears it but does not say anything on the day he hears it, then her vows will remain valid, and her commitments will stand. But if her husband disapproves on the day he hears it, then he nullifies her vow and whatever she has said that commits her; the Lord will forgive her. Every vow made by a widow or a divorced woman remains valid against her. If she vowed in her husband's house or committed herself with an oath, and her husband heard it but did not say anything or disallow her, then all her vows and commitments will stand. But if her husband completely voids them on the day he hears them, then whatever she said regarding her vows or commitments won't count; her husband has voided them, and the Lord will forgive her. Every vow and every binding oath to afflict the soul can be either confirmed or nullified by her husband. If he stays silent about them day after day, then he confirms all her vows or commitments; he validates them because he remained silent on the day he heard them. But if he nullifies them in any way after he has heard them, then he will bear her wrongdoing."
From the dark and deeply shaded back-ground of the picture of female degradation, formed by the facts which have now been adduced, and which might easily be corroborated by an immense accumulation of evidence, Christianity is brought forward with conspicuous prominence, and in all her gracefulness. The contrast is at once striking and affecting: the moral scene brightens upon the view as we contemplate this attractive figure combining majesty and mildness--fascination in her smiles and heaven in her eye.
From the dark and deeply shaded background of the picture of women's degradation, created by the facts that have now been presented, and which could easily be supported by a vast amount of evidence, Christianity stands out clearly and beautifully. The contrast is immediately striking and moving: the moral landscape brightens as we look at this appealing figure that blends strength and gentleness—captivation in her smile and divinity in her gaze.
The superiority which the religion of Jesus has secured to women above the state of barbaric degradation, Mahometan slavery, and Jewish subjection, proclaims the glory of that system, which has already meliorated society to its minutest subdivisions, and will eventually transform the moral desert of human being into a paradise of beauty and bliss. The argument, however, will be seen with more distinctness, by the following brief detail.
The advantage that the religion of Jesus has given women over the conditions of barbaric degradation, Islamic slavery, and Jewish subjugation highlights the greatness of that system, which has already improved society at every level and will ultimately turn the moral wasteland of humanity into a paradise of beauty and joy. However, the argument will be clearer with the following brief explanation.
1. The personal conduct of the divine Author of Christianity, tended to elevate the female sex to a degree of consideration in society before unknown. During the life of our Lord, women were admitted to a holy familiarity with him, attended his public labours, ministered to his wants, and adhered to him with heroic zeal, when their attachment exposed them to insult, danger and death.
1. The personal conduct of the divine Author of Christianity helped to raise the status of women in society to an unprecedented level. During the life of our Lord, women were welcomed into a close relationship with him, participated in his public activities, supported his needs, and stayed loyal to him with remarkable courage, even when their devotion put them at risk of insult, danger, and death.
Immediately after the marriage of Cana in Galilee, where he attended with his mother, he accompanied her with his brethren and disciples to Capernaum. That excellent spirit, for which he was remarkable from his earliest years, continued to influence his mind in maturer life, and taught him justly to appreciate and perfectly to exemplify the domestic and social duties. He did not scruple to converse with a Samaritan woman, who came to draw water at Jacob's well, though his disciples, in whose minds Jewish prejudices continued to prevail, expressed their astonishment at his condescension. Never was there so fine a specimen of patience, gentleness, and humility, blended with true dignity, as upon that remarkable occasion. He instructed her ignorance, endured her petulance, corrected her mistakes, awakened her conscience, converted her heart, and eventually honoured her as a messenger of mercy and salvation to her Samaritan friends. At another time, when the disciples rebuked those who brought their little children to him, that he might put his hands on them and pray, he kindly interposed; and evincing the most sympathetic tenderness towards the solicitudes which, on such an occasion, would necessarily pervade the maternal bosom, he said, "Suffer little children, and forbid them not to come unto me; for of such is the kingdom of heaven: and he laid his hands on them." On various occasions, when he performed some of his most illustrious miracles, females were personally concerned, and shared his distinguished notice and condolence. Such particularly was the case when he met the funeral procession at Nain: it was that of a young man, represented in the simple and affecting language of the evangelist, as "the only son of his mother, and she was a widow." The meeting was apparently casual; but Jesus was instantly and deeply impressed with the circumstances: he in particular felt compassion for the weeping parent--addressed her in kind and gentle terms--remanded the spirit from its eternal flight, to inhabit again for a season the body from which it had so lately departed, and delivered the reanimated youth to his mother. He blended his tears with those of Martha and Mary, at the sepulchre of their brother; and after instructing them upon the subject of the resurrection from the dead, restored him to their wishes and affections." Women "ministered unto Jesus of their substance,"--"the daughters of Jerusalem" bewailed him when he was led to crucifixion--and the "women that followed him from Galilee were deeply interested spectators of his sufferings, observed his sepulchre, and prepared spices and ointments. It was Mary Magdalene who enjoyed the honour and happiness of a first manifestation after Jesus was risen from the dead, and she was commissioned to go and inform the rest of his sorrowing disciples. "The frequent mention," says Doddridge "which is made in the evangelists of the generous and courageous zeal of some pious women in the service of Christ, and especially of the faithful and resolute constancy with which they attended him in those last scenes of his suffering, might very possibly be intended to obviate that haughty and senseless contempt, which the pride of men, often irritated by those vexations to which their own irregular passions have exposed them, has in all ages affected to throw on that sex, which probably, in the sight of God, constitute by far the better half of mankind; and to whose care and tenderness the wisest and best of men generally owe and ascribe much of the daily comfort and enjoyment of their lives."
Immediately after the wedding at Cana in Galilee, where he was there with his mother, he went with her, his brothers, and his disciples to Capernaum. That wonderful character, which he had shown from a young age, continued to shape his thoughts in adulthood and taught him to value and demonstrate his family and social responsibilities perfectly. He didn't hesitate to talk to a Samaritan woman who came to draw water at Jacob's well, even though his disciples, who held onto the biases of their culture, were surprised by his willingness. There never was a better example of patience, gentleness, and humility combined with true dignity than on that noteworthy occasion. He taught her what she didn’t know, put up with her irritability, corrected her errors, stirred her conscience, changed her heart, and ultimately honored her as a messenger of mercy and salvation to her Samaritan friends. At one point, when the disciples scolded those bringing little children to him so that he could bless them, he kindly stepped in. Showing genuine compassion for the worries that would naturally fill a mother's heart in such a situation, he said, "Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them; for to such belongs the kingdom of heaven," and he laid his hands on them. On different occasions, when he performed some of his most amazing miracles, women were directly involved and received his special attention and compassion. This was especially true when he encountered the funeral procession in Nain for a young man described in the simple and touching words of the evangelist as "the only son of his mother, and she was a widow." The meeting seemed accidental, but Jesus was immediately and profoundly moved by the situation; he particularly felt for the grieving mother—addressed her with kind and gentle words—brought the spirit back from its eternal journey to inhabit once more the body it had just left, and handed the revived young man back to his mother. He shared tears with Martha and Mary at their brother’s tomb; and after teaching them about the resurrection, he returned him to their embrace. Women "provided for Jesus out of their own resources,"—"the daughters of Jerusalem" lamented for him as he was led to crucifixion—and the "women who followed him from Galilee were heartfelt witnesses to his suffering, saw his tomb, and prepared spices and ointments. It was Mary Magdalene who had the privilege and joy of being the first to see Jesus after he rose from the dead, and she was tasked with informing the rest of his mourning disciples. "The frequent mention," says Doddridge, "of the generous and brave commitment of some devout women in serving Christ, especially the faithful and courageous manner in which they supported him during his final hours of suffering, may have been meant to counteract the disdainful and senseless contempt that men's pride, often frayed by their own unruly passions, has poured onto the female sex throughout history—a gender that likely comprises, in the eyes of God, the better half of humanity; and for whose care and compassion the wisest and best of men generally owe much of their daily comfort and happiness."
2. As the conduct of Christ naturally induced his disciples to imitate the example of their illustrious Master, the subsequent admission of women to all the privileges of the Christian Church, tended exceedingly to confirm their elevation, and evince their importance in society. When the primitive converts to the Christian faith wished publicly to avow their dereliction of heathen idolatry, and their emancipation from the bondage of Judaism, by being baptized in water, both sexes were admitted without distinction to this solemn rite. At a very early period of the primitive church, when the city of Samaria received the word of God by the preaching of Philip, which with its accompanying miracles, diffused an universal joy, "they were baptized, both MEN and WOMEN;" and the apostle Paul, in writing to the Galatians, expresses himself in this triumphant strain: "For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ, have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither MALE nor FEMALE, for ye are ALL ONE in Christ Jesus."
2. As Christ's behavior naturally inspired his disciples to follow the example of their great Master, the later inclusion of women in all the privileges of the Christian Church greatly reinforced their status and showed their significance in society. When the early converts to the Christian faith wanted to publicly declare their rejection of pagan idol worship and their liberation from the constraints of Judaism by being baptized in water, both genders were welcomed without distinction to this important rite. At a very early stage in the early church, when the city of Samaria embraced the word of God through Philip's preaching, accompanied by miracles that spread joy, "they were baptized, both MEN and WOMEN;" and the apostle Paul, in his letter to the Galatians, states triumphantly: "For you are all children of God through faith in Christ Jesus. For all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, neither slave nor free, neither MALE nor FEMALE, for you are ALL ONE in Christ Jesus."
Sentiments like these, combined with the practice of an institution so expressive and so remarkable, tended to circulate among the primitive Christians those feelings of respect and affection for women, which, by elevating them to their proper rank in society, must necessarily purify the public morals, meliorate individual character, and ennoble the intercourse of life. Admitted to an equal participation of the privileges of God's house, where every minor distinction is annihilated by the predominance of a diffusive charity, and feeling that their present joys and future destinies were blended with those of the "holy brethren, partakers of the heavenly calling;" the female part of the community rose into importance as rational, but especially as immortal beings.
Sentiments like these, along with the practices of such a meaningful and extraordinary institution, encouraged early Christians to develop feelings of respect and affection for women. By elevating women to their rightful place in society, this was bound to improve public morals, enhance individual character, and enrich social interactions. Given equal access to the privileges of God’s house, where all minor distinctions fade away in the presence of widespread love, and feeling that their current joys and future destinies were intertwined with those of the “holy brethren, partakers of the heavenly calling,” women in the community gained significance as rational, and particularly as immortal beings.
After the ascension of Christ, the historian of the Acts of the Apostles informs us, that "the WOMEN, and Mary, the mother of Jesus," assembled with the apostles to worship in the upper room at Jerusalem; being equally interested in the great events which had recently occurred, and in the devotional services in which they now engaged. Paul directs Timothy to treat "the elder women as mothers, the younger as sisters, with all purity." He also desires him to "honour widows that are widows indeed," and to afford them all proper relief by charitable contributions, a practice for which the first Christians were highly distinguished. Women are represented by an apostle himself as fellow-labourers in the Gospel, assisting them, not only by their example, to which he willingly pointed the attention of the churches, but by their prayers, their visits of mercy, and other similar methods of co-operatiug in the propagation of the truth, and the promotion of individual happiness.
After Christ's ascension, the historian of the Acts of the Apostles tells us that "the WOMEN, and Mary, the mother of Jesus," gathered with the apostles to worship in the upper room in Jerusalem. They were equally invested in the significant events that had just taken place and in the worship services they were now participating in. Paul instructs Timothy to treat "the elder women as mothers, the younger as sisters, with all purity." He also wants him to "honour widows that are widows indeed" and provide them with proper support through charitable contributions, a practice for which the early Christians were well-known. An apostle himself describes women as fellow-labourers in the Gospel, helping not only through their example, which he intentionally highlighted to the churches, but also through their prayers, acts of kindness, and other similar ways of working together to spread the truth and improve individual happiness.
As the immediate effects of original transgression upon the woman were most obvious and most deplorable, and as her debasement from the eminence assigned her by the Creator has been completed by the misrule of passion, and the gradual advancement of human degeneracy: so the direct operation of Christianity is apparent, according to the degree of its prevalence, in elevating her to a state which was known before only in the garden of Eden--a state in which she again assumes a rank, which regenerated man cheerfully concedes, wherein she regains the lost paradise of love and tenderness; while the more remote influence of this system is discernible in the recognition of her rights, wherever its benign dominion extends. Now she ascends to the glory of an intelligent creature, gladdens by her presence the solitary hours of existence, beguiles by her converse and sympathy the rough and tedious paths of life, and not only acquires personal dignity and importance, but in some measure new modifies, purifies, and exalts the character of man. If we cannot but weep over the affecting representation of the departure of Adam and Eve from the scene of innocence and of celestial manifestation, when
As the immediate effects of the original sin on the woman were most clear and unfortunate, and as her fall from the greatness intended for her by the Creator has been completed through the chaos of passion and the slow decline of humanity: so the direct impact of Christianity is evident, depending on how widespread it is, in raising her to a position that was only known in the garden of Eden—a position where she regains a role that renewed humanity gladly gives her, allowing her to reclaim the lost paradise of love and compassion; while the more remote effects of this faith are seen in the acknowledgment of her rights wherever its kind influence reaches. Now she rises to the honor of an intelligent being, brings joy to the lonely moments of life, comforts with her conversation and empathy through the rough and tiring paths of existence, and not only gains personal dignity and significance but also somewhat transforms, purifies, and elevates the character of man. If we cannot help but mourn the poignant image of Adam and Eve leaving the sphere of innocence and divine presence when
"The brandish'd sword of God before them blaz'd
Fierce as a comet: which with torrid heat
And vapours, as the Libyan air adust,
Begun to parch that temperate clime; whereat
In either hand the hast'ning angel caught
Our ling'ring parents, and to the eastern gate
Led them direct, and down the cliff as fast
To the subjected plain----"
"The sword of God shone brightly in front of them,
Fierce like a comet: which with intense heat
And fumes, like the dry air of Libya,
Started to scorch that mild climate; at that moment,
The swift angel grabbed our delayed parents in both hands,
And led them straight to the eastern gate,
Quickly down the cliff to the lowland----"
and when, taking a hasty retrospect of their lost felicity, in consequence of transgression, and cherishing gloomy forebodings of that melancholy futurity, which seemed already to pour from its dark clouds the deluging rain of grief and misery--
and when, looking back quickly at their lost happiness because of their mistakes, and holding onto dark thoughts about the sad future that already seemed to be spilling over with heavy rain of sorrow and suffering--
"Some natural tears they dropp'd, but wip'd them soon;
The world was all before them, where to choose
Their place of rest, and Providence their guide;
They, hand in hand, with wand'ring steps and slow
Through Eden took their solitary way;----"
"They shed a few natural tears, but quickly wiped them away;
The world lay ahead of them, open for them to choose
Their resting place, with Providence guiding them;
They walked hand in hand, with wandering steps and slow
Through Eden on their lonely path;----"
--if we must mourn over so sad a scene, Christianity a wakens sympathies of an opposite description, by exhibiting a goodly number of their descendants as inhabitants of the CHRISTIAN CHURCH--the grand repository of heavenly blessings, and the dwelling-place of peace--at whose holy altar of truth souls are wedded, and at whose sacramental board they celebrate an everlasting union. Nothing can present a scene more worthy the attention of mankind, or more attractive to the eyes of witnessing angels, than this association of persons in pious fellowship, without distinction of birth or country, age or sex; participators in equal proportions of the same happiness, children of one common parent, and heirs of one rich inheritance!
--if we must grieve over such a sad scene, Christianity awakens feelings of a different kind by showing many of their descendants as members of the CHRISTIAN CHURCH--the great source of heavenly blessings and a place of peace--where souls are united at the holy altar of truth, and where they celebrate an everlasting bond at the sacramental table. Nothing can showcase a scene more deserving of humanity's attention or more appealing to witnessing angels than this gathering of people in shared faith, regardless of background, nationality, age, or gender; sharing equally in the same joy, children of one common creator, and inheritors of a shared wealth!
3. The, great principles asserted by the religion of Jesus, secure to women, as an unquestionable right, that exaltation in society, which his conduct, and that of his followers conferred. These principles may he traced in the New Testament, either as necessarily comprehending, by their generality, a proper treatment of the female sex, or as developing themselves in particular regulations and enactments.
3. The great principles established by the teachings of Jesus guarantee women an undeniable right to the elevated status in society that his actions and those of his followers provided. These principles can be found in the New Testament, either by inherently including, through their broad nature, a respectful treatment of women or by being expressed in specific rules and laws.
Christianity breathes a spirit of the most diffusive charity and good will: and wherever its "power" is felt, it moulds the character into the image of benevolence. Love is the beauty and the strength of this "spiritual building;" a love, at once comprehensive in its range, and minute in its ramifications: adjusting the diversified claims of society and religion with perfect exactness, and directing the exercise of all the social affections. The fountain being purified, the streams become pure; the heart, which is the centre mid spring of moral action, being renewed, the conduct will be distinguished by a corresponding degree of virtue, goodness, and sanctity. But as Christianity produces a general transformation of character, by subduing the ferocious and brutal propensities of man; clearing away the rank and noxious weeds that overspread human nature, and sowing the seeds of moral excellence, the effect must be discernible in the whole intercourse of life. Immorality trembles, domestic tyranny retires abashed before the majesty of religion, and peace pervades that dwelling where power was law, and woman a slave. In fact, every precept of the Gospel that inculcates kindness, sympathy, gentleness, meekness, courtesy, and all the other graces that bloom in the garden of the Lord--indirectly, and by no unintelligible or forced application, provides for the honour and glory of the female sex. If the most effectual method of degrading woman be to barbarize man, the certain means of dignifying her is to christianize him.
Christianity embodies a spirit of widespread charity and goodwill, and wherever its influence is felt, it shapes character into the image of kindness. Love is both the beauty and strength of this "spiritual building"; a love that is broad in its reach and detailed in its expressions, perfectly balancing the various demands of society and religion while guiding all social feelings. When the source is purified, the streams become clean; with the heart, the center and source of moral action, renewed, behavior will reflect a corresponding level of virtue, goodness, and holiness. As Christianity brings about a total transformation of character, subduing humanity's fierce and brutal instincts, removing the harmful and toxic traits that afflict human nature, and planting the seeds of moral excellence, the effects will be evident in every aspect of life. Immorality shudders, domestic tyranny retreats in shame before the power of religion, and peace fills the home where power once ruled and women were oppressed. In fact, every teaching of the Gospel that promotes kindness, empathy, gentleness, humility, courtesy, and all the other virtues that thrive in the garden of the Lord indirectly ensures the honor and respect of women. If the best way to demean women is to dehumanize men, then the surest way to uplift her is to instill Christian values in him.
It is to be noticed also, that there is no sex in conscience, and that for the discharge of the duties of piety, each is equally capacitated, and therefore equally responsible. If men were to give an account at the tribunal of heaven, not only for their personal actions and principles, but for those of women, to whom they are related by the ties of consanguinity, or with whom they are connected by circumstances, there would be some reason in assuming a jurisdiction over their faith, and disputing their claims to rationality and to respectful treatment; but not to insist upon the moral constitution of the female sex, and the whole drift of divine revelation, the very terms of the initiatory ordinance of the Christian church, to which they are equally entitled, illustrates and secures their prerogatives--for it is "the answer of a good conscience towards God." When men impose fetters upon other men, condemning, imprisoning, fining, scourging, burning, and anathematizing them, merely because they dare to think for themselves in matters which can only concern God and their own souls, and will not have their faith decreed by arbitrary power and exasperated ignorance, it need not excite surprise, that they should assume the right of behaving to the weaker sex with all the capriciousness of despotism; and no authority but that of Scripture, which maintains the privileges of all thinking beings, can effectually restrain the wickedness of man's UNMANLY usurpation.
It should also be noted that there is no gender in conscience, and that for fulfilling the duties of devotion, everyone is equally capable and therefore equally responsible. If men were accountable at the judgment seat of heaven, not only for their own actions and beliefs but also for those of the women they are connected to by blood or circumstances, there would be some justification for claiming authority over their faith and questioning their rights to rationality and respect. However, insisting on the moral nature of women and the entire focus of divine revelation, along with the very terms of the initiation ceremony of the Christian church to which they are equally entitled, illustrates and protects their rights—it is "the answer of a good conscience towards God." When men impose restrictions on other men, condemning, imprisoning, fining, whipping, burning, and excommunicating them simply because they choose to think for themselves in matters that only concern God and their own souls, and refuse to have their beliefs dictated by arbitrary power and stubborn ignorance, it should come as no surprise that they would feel entitled to treat the weaker sex with all the whims of a tyrant. Only the authority of Scripture, which upholds the rights of all thinking beings, can effectively limit the evil of man's UNMANLY usurpation.
The precepts of Christianity bespeak its characteristic regard to the reciprocal duties and respective rank of the sexes, adjusting their claims with a nicety that precludes disputation, and an authority that commands assent. They are not arbitrary enactments; but being founded in the highest reason, and connected with individual felicity, approve themselves to every well-regulated mind. In our behaviour to others, we are not only prohibited from indulging the vindictive and malignant passions, but exhorted to do them good by the employment of our pecuniary resources, social opportunities, and moral means, to advance both their temporal and eternal interests. While these principles necessarily comprise the discharge of all relative duties, these are besides specifically enumerated and enforced. Husbands, in whose hands barbarism had placed a tyrannic sceptre, are required by the religion of Jesus to renounce their unjust domination, and to descend to the regulated and affectionate intercourse of the domestic hearth. It is expressly enjoined upon them to "love their wives," and not to be "bitter against them." "Let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself: so ought men to love their wives as their own bodies."--"Ye husbands, dwell with your wives according to knowledge, giving honour unto the wife as unto the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the grace of life." "Let one of you in particular so love his wife as himself, and the wife see that she reverence her husband."
The teachings of Christianity clearly emphasize the mutual responsibilities and roles of men and women, balancing their needs with precision that avoids argument and an authority that earns agreement. These are not random rules; they are based on deep reasoning and linked to personal happiness, making sense to any well-adjusted person. In our interactions with others, we are not only discouraged from indulging in spiteful and harmful feelings, but we are also encouraged to do good by using our money, social connections, and ethical means to support both their temporary needs and their eternal well-being. While these principles inherently include fulfilling all relationship duties, they are also specifically outlined and reinforced. Husbands, who previously wielded an oppressive power, are called by the teachings of Jesus to abandon their unfair control and engage in a respectful and loving relationship at home. They are explicitly instructed to "love their wives" and not to be "harsh with them." "Each of you should love his wife as himself; men should love their wives as their own bodies." - "Husbands, live with your wives in an understanding way, honoring the wife as the weaker partner and as heirs together of the grace of life." "Each husband should love his wife as himself, and the wife should respect her husband."
Christianity also expressly abolishes, at least by necessary implication, polygamy and the power of divorce, as they existed among barbarous nations, perpetuating the degradation of women, and spreading confusion in society. "Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away, doth commit adultery." "Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them that know the law.) how that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth? For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as be liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband." And, "Let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband." Paley remarks, "The manners of different countries have varied in nothing more than in their domestic constitutions. Less polished and more luxurious nations have either not perceived the bad effects of polygamy, or, if they did perceive them, they who in such countries possessed the power of reforming the laws, have been unwilling to resign their own gratifications. Polygamy is retained at this day among the Turks, and throughout every part of Asia in which Christianity is not professed. In Christian countries it is universally prohibited. In Sweden it is punished with death. In England, besides the nullity of the second marriage, it subjects the offender to transportation, or imprisonment and branding, for the first offence, and to capital punishment for the second. And whatever may be said in behalf of polygamy when it is authorized by the law of the land, the marriage of a second wife during the lifetime of the first, in countries where such a second marriage is void, must be ranked with the most dangerous and cruel of those frauds by which a woman is cheated out of her fortune, her person, and her happiness.
Christianity clearly eliminates, at least by necessary implication, polygamy and the ability to divorce, as they were practiced among primitive societies, which degraded women and caused chaos in society. "Anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery; and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery." "Don't you know, brothers, (for I speak to those who understand the law) that the law has authority over someone only as long as they live? For a woman is bound to her husband by law as long as he is alive; but if her husband dies, she is released from the law regarding her husband." And, "Let each man have his own wife, and let each woman have her own husband." Paley points out, "The customs of different countries have varied greatly in their family structures. Less refined and more indulgent societies have either not recognized the negative impacts of polygamy, or if they did, those who had the power to change the laws were unwilling to give up their own pleasures. Polygamy is still practiced today among Turks and in many parts of Asia where Christianity is not followed. In Christian countries, it is completely banned. In Sweden, it is punishable by death. In England, in addition to the invalidity of the second marriage, the offender faces transportation, imprisonment and branding for the first offense, and death penalty for the second. Regardless of any arguments in favor of polygamy when it is allowed by law, marrying a second wife while the first is still living, in countries where such a second marriage is invalid, must be seen as one of the most harmful and cruel deceptions by which a woman is stripped of her wealth, her identity, and her happiness.
"The ancient Medes compelled their citizens, in one canton, to take seven wives; in another, each woman to receive five husbands; according as war had made, in one quarter of their country, an extraordinary havoc among the men, or the women had been carried away by an enemy from another. This regulation, so far as it was adapted to the proportion which subsisted between the number of males and females, was founded in the reason upon which the most improved nations of Europe proceed at present.
"The ancient Medes forced their citizens in one region to have seven wives and in another, each woman to have five husbands. This arrangement was made because war had caused significant losses among the men in one area of their country, or because women had been taken by an enemy from elsewhere. This rule, reflecting the balance between the number of men and women, was based on the same reasoning that the most developed countries in Europe use today."
"Cæsar found among the inhabitants of this island a species of polygamy, if it may be so called, which was perfectly singular. Uxores, says he, habent deni duodenique inter se communes; et maxime fratres cum fratribus, parentesque cum liberis: sed si qui sint ex his nati, corum habentur liberi, quo primum virgo quaque deducta est."
"Cæsar discovered among the people of this island a unique form of polygamy, if it can be called that. They have wives in common, usually in groups of ten or twelve; primarily brothers with brothers, and parents with their children: but if any children are born from these unions, they are considered the offspring of the first man to whom each girl was married."
The same perspicuous writer adds, upon the subject of divorce, "The Scriptures seem to have drawn the obligation tighter than the law of nature left it. 'Whosoever,' saith Christ, 'shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away, doth commit adultery.' The law of Moses, for reasons of local expediency, permitted the Jewish husband to put away his wife; but whether for every cause, or for what causes, appears to have been controverted amongst the interpreters of those times. Christ, the precepts of whose religion were calculated for more general use and observation, revokes this permission, (as given to the Jews 'for the hardness of their hearts,') and promulges a law which was thenceforward to confine divorces to the single cause of adultery in the wife. And I see no sufficient reason to depart from the plain and strict meaning of Christ's words. The rule was new. It both surprised and offended his disciples, yet Christ added nothing to relax or explain it.
The same clear writer also discusses divorce, saying, "The Scriptures seem to have made the obligation stronger than natural law did. 'Whoever,' says Christ, 'puts away his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery; and whoever marries her who has been put away, commits adultery.' The law of Moses allowed Jewish husbands to divorce their wives for practical reasons, but it seems there was debate among interpreters about whether it was for any reason or specific ones. Christ, whose teachings were meant for broader application, revoked this permission (given to the Jews 'because of their hard hearts') and established a law that limited divorces to the sole reason of the wife's adultery. I see no compelling reason to interpret Christ's words differently. This rule was new. It surprised and upset his disciples, yet Christ didn’t add anything to clarify or soften it."
"Inferior causes may justify the separation of husband and wife, although they will not authorize such a dissolution of the marriage contract as would leave either party at liberty to marry again; for it is that liberty, in which the danger and mischief of divorces principally consist. If the care of children does not require that they should live together, and it is become, in the serious judgment of both, necessary for their mutual happiness that they should separate, let them separate by consent. Nevertheless, this necessity can hardly exist, without guilt and misconduct on one side or on both. Moreover, cruelty, ill usage, extreme violence, or moroseness of temper, or other great and continual provocations, make it lawful for the party aggrieved to withdraw from the society of the offender, without his or her consent. The law which imposes the marriage vow, whereby the parties promise to 'keep to each other,' or in other words to live together, must be understood to impose it with a silent reservation of these cases; because the same law has constituted a judicial relief from the tyranny of her husband, by the divorce à mensa et toro, and by the provision which it makes for the separate maintenance of the injured wife. St. Paul, likewise, distinguishes between a wife merely separating herself from the family of her husband, and her marrying again: 'Let not the wife depart from her husband; but, and if she do depart, let her remain unmarried.'" [114]
"Less serious reasons may justify the separation of a husband and wife, but they won't allow for a complete ending of the marriage contract that would permit either party to marry again; because that freedom is where the main risks and problems of divorce lie. If caring for the children doesn't require that they live together, and both believe that separating is necessary for their mutual happiness, they should separate by agreement. However, this necessity usually implies some wrongdoing or fault on one or both sides. Additionally, cruelty, mistreatment, extreme violence, a bad temper, or ongoing serious provocation makes it acceptable for the hurt party to leave the company of the offender without consent. The law that enforces the marriage vow, which requires them to 'be faithful to each other,' or in other words, live together, must be interpreted with an unspoken exception for these situations; because the same law has created a legal remedy against a husband's abuse through divorce à mensa et toro, and provisions for the separate support of the wronged wife. St. Paul also makes a distinction between a wife merely leaving her husband's home and her remarrying: 'Let not the wife leave her husband; but if she does leave, let her stay unmarried.'" [114]
Notwithstanding the survey we have taken of the general degradation of the female sex, where the benign influences of Christianity have been unfelt, the argument may be confronted by a formidable array of plausible objections. It may be said, that amidst the barbarity of the SCANDINAVIAN NATIONS, they treated their women with extraordinary respect. The Scythians exempted the daughter from the punishment in which the son was obliged to partake with the father, and the German women even inherited the throne. Some of the laws, among the Goths, respecting illicit intercourse, were highly reasonable and just, and our remote ancestors may be cited as examples of treating women with the utmost veneration. It may seem indicative also of the prevalence of similar sentiments, that the ancient mythologies abound in female divinities: the Phoenicians worshipped the goddess Astarte, the Scythians, Appia, the Scandinavians, Friggia, the wife of Odin. It may be further urged, with regard to the GREEKS and ROMANS, that though the melancholy picture we have already drawn of their conduct be true, yet their history presents some remarkable evidences of the elevated condition of their women, and the honourable regard which they obtained. Among the former, indeed, few instances can be adduced, in addition to that of Areta, the daughter of Aristippus, who fixed upon her son the surname of Μητροδιδακτος, or disciple of his mother, in consequence of her having been his instructer in the sciences and philosophy. The Romans, at some periods of their history, paid extraordinary respect to their women; the institution of the vestals is a memorial of the estimation in which female virtue was held, and the emperor Heliogabalus was desirous that his wife should have a voice in the senate. They allowed their women to celebrate an annual feast, to commemorate the reconciliation between them and the Sabines, by means of their wives; and they erected an equestrian statue to Cloelia, and a temple to Fortune, in honour of the sex; because the mother and wife of Coriolanus had caused that hero to retire weeping from his native country, when he was irresistible by arms. [115] But the most plausible objection to the general argument seems derivable from the history of CHIVALRY, under whose influence it is alleged that women were not only not degraded, but were actually advanced to the highest condition, and possessed the most commanding influence. The knights, at their installation, took solemn vows of self-devotement to the cause of female honour; and ladies were constantly engaged as umpires at tournaments, took off the armour of the conquerors, and irivested them with magnificent robes. The middle ages witnessed the extraordinary sight of knight-errants wandering over distant countries, with their sword and lance in hand, to contest the point of the beauty and virtue of their ladies, with all who ventured to intimate the slightest doubt or suspicion on the subject. Their expeditions were usually made in consequence of some requisition on the part of their mistresses, or to fulfil a vow voluntarily incurred in a moment of intoxication and excitement.
Despite the survey we’ve conducted on the overall decline of women’s status in places where the positive impacts of Christianity have been absent, there are many strong counterarguments to consider. It could be said that despite the brutality of the Scandinavian nations, they treated their women with remarkable respect. The Scythians exempted daughters from the punishments that sons had to endure alongside their fathers, and German women could even inherit the throne. Some laws among the Goths regarding illicit relationships were quite reasonable and fair, and our distant ancestors can be pointed to as examples of treating women with the highest respect. It might also suggest the prevalence of similar attitudes that ancient mythologies are filled with female deities: the Phoenicians worshipped the goddess Astarte, the Scythians honored Appia, and the Scandinavians revered Frigga, the wife of Odin. Furthermore, regarding the Greeks and Romans, while the sad picture we’ve already painted of their behavior is accurate, their history does show some remarkable evidence of the elevated status of their women and the respect they received. Among the Greeks, indeed, few examples can be cited, aside from Areta, the daughter of Aristippus, who gave her son the name Μητροδιδακτος, or disciple of his mother, since she was his teacher in sciences and philosophy. The Romans, at certain times in their history, showed great respect for their women; the institution of the Vestals is a testament to how female virtue was valued, and the emperor Heliogabalus wished for his wife to have a say in the Senate. They allowed their women to celebrate an annual feast to commemorate their reconciliation with the Sabines, thanks to their wives; and they erected an equestrian statue to Cloelia and a temple to Fortune in honor of women because the mother and wife of Coriolanus caused that hero to leave his homeland in tears when he was unbeatable in battle. [115] However, the most convincing counterargument to the general position seems to come from the history of chivalry, which claims that women were not only not degraded but were actually elevated to the highest status and held significant influence. During their initiation, knights took solemn vows to devote themselves to the cause of women's honor; ladies frequently served as judges at tournaments, removed the armor from the victors, and dressed them in splendid robes. The Middle Ages saw the remarkable sight of knight-errants traveling to far-off lands, sword and lance in hand, to defend the beauty and virtue of their ladies against anyone who dared to express even the slightest doubt or suspicion about it. Their quests were typically undertaken at the request of their mistresses or to fulfill a vow made impulsively in a moment of excitement and intoxication.
The reply to these general objections has been in part anticipated. Christianity assigns to women their proper place in society, neither admitting of their being tyrannized over by despotic authority, nor impiously honoured by a ridiculous adulation. They are to be viewed as help meets, not, as slaves; to be respected and loved, but not deified. While the religion of Jesus raises them to great consideration in the scale of society, it imposes a salutary restraint upon human passions, and checks every approach to the assumption of an unnatural superiority. It bestows a rank which secures them from contempt or disregard, while it equally prevents a senseless adoration: so that its principles disallow the barbaric treatment of uncivilized nations and the follies of the chivalrous ages.
The response to these general objections has been partially anticipated. Christianity gives women their rightful place in society, rejecting both the oppression by authoritarian rule and the ridiculous flattery that can be equally disrespectful. They are meant to be seen as partners, not as slaves; to be respected and loved, but not idolized. While the teachings of Jesus elevate their status within society, they also impose a healthy restraint on human desires and prevent any claim to an unnatural superiority. This faith grants them a position that shields them from disdain or neglect, while also preventing foolish idolization, thereby rejecting the cruel treatment found in uncivilized societies and the absurdities of chivalric times.
In the different periods and places to which the objection refers, the conduct of mankind was marked with inconsistency. Greece and Rome exhibit ample specimens of this nature; and the time of chivalry afford illustrations equally remarkable. The knights of the order were not distinguished by fidelity to their wives, or by a concern for the education of their daughters: their devotion to the female sex was, in fact, without principle and without love; they fought, from vanity and fashion, for persons whom they had basely dishonoured and secretly despised; and while their flattery and folly were sufficiently discreditable to their own understandings and hearts, they tended in a deplorable degree to corrupt the principles of those whom they professed to value.
In the various times and places referenced by the objection, people's behavior was marked by inconsistency. Greece and Rome provide plenty of examples of this; the era of chivalry also offers notable illustrations. The knights of the order weren't known for their loyalty to their wives or their interest in educating their daughters. Their devotion to women was actually without principle and love; they fought out of vanity and fashion for those they had dishonored and secretly looked down on. While their flattery and foolishness were damaging to their own minds and hearts, they also significantly corrupted the principles of those they claimed to care about.
It is further obvious, that in the very best periods of Greek and Roman history there existed no security against a change in the treatment of women, arising from the general recognition of any of those great principles of moral conduct which constitute the basis of good government and of well-regulated society. Passion predominated above reason, and received its impulse solely from casual circumstances. It was, in fact, accidental, whether it should operate amiably or malignantly; and the felicity of one half of the human species depended upon the precarious and ever vacillating humour of the other. Virtue was scarcely seen upon the earth, except at occasional and often distant visitations, or as she shed a fitful and flickering light into the retreats of systematic philosophy. Woman was at the mercy of every wind--to-day honoured--to-morrow despised--now a goddess--and anon a slave! Viewing heathen countries in the most favourable aspect in which history presents them, and admitting to the fullest extent the correctness of those details of virtue and valour which she has transmitted to us, the conduct of the Celtic and Scandinavian nations, and instances deduced from cultivated and classic regions, or from modern times, can only be considered as exceptions which do not impugn the general alignment, corroborated as it has been by a historical and geographical delineation of society in every age of the world, and every quarter of the globe.
It is also clear that even during the best times in Greek and Roman history, there was no guarantee that women would be treated well, despite any recognition of important moral principles that form the foundation of good governance and a well-ordered society. Emotion took precedence over reason and was influenced only by random circumstances. Whether this influence was positive or negative was, in fact, accidental; the happiness of one half of humanity depended on the unstable and unpredictable moods of the other. Virtue was rarely seen, making only occasional and often distant appearances, or casting a faint and flickering light into the depths of systematic philosophy. Women were subject to shifting fortunes—one day honored, the next day scorned; now treated like goddesses, and soon after reduced to slavery! Even when considering pagan societies in the best light history offers, and fully acknowledging the accounts of virtue and bravery they provide, the behavior of the Celtic and Scandinavian nations, along with examples from educated, classical regions or modern times, can only be viewed as exceptions that do not contradict the general pattern supported by a historical and geographical overview of society throughout every era and across the globe.
Behold Christianity, then, walking forth in her purity and greatness to bless the earth, diffusing her light in every direction, distributing her charities on either hand, quenching the flames of lust and the fires of ambition, silencing discord, spreading peace, and creating all things new! Angels watch her progress, celebrate her influence, and anticipate her final triumphs! The moral creation brightens beneath her smiles, and owns her renovating power; at her approach man loses his fierceness and woman her chains; each becomes blessed in the other, and God glorified in both!
Look at Christianity, then, stepping forward in her purity and greatness to bless the world, spreading her light in every direction, sharing her kindness on both sides, putting out the flames of desire and the fires of ambition, calming disputes, promoting peace, and making everything new! Angels observe her journey, celebrate her impact, and look forward to her ultimate victories! The moral world brightens under her smile and acknowledges her renewing power; as she arrives, man loses his harshness and woman her bonds; each becomes a blessing to the other, and God is glorified in both!
Appendix.
(SEE p. 320.)
(SEE p. 320.)
The concurrent evidence of a variety of passages of Scripture respecting the existence of Satan, ind his interference in human concerns, have been rejected with singular and pertinacious audacity, solely upon the ground that the whole of these representations must be figurative, because they are not consonant to human reason--which seems to be a very dignified sort of personage, assuming to herself the right of calling revelation to her bar, and disposing at pleasure of the doctrines of Heaven. As, however, truth will always bear investigation, it may not be improper to devote a few additional pages to this subject, with a view of satisfying; the humble inquirer, that sound sense and divine testimony are really and entirely coincident.
The combined evidence from various scripture passages about the existence of Satan and his involvement in human affairs has been dismissed with a remarkable and stubborn arrogance, purely on the basis that these representations must be figurative, as they don’t align with human reason—which seems to be quite a self-important entity, assuming the authority to put revelation on trial and dismiss the doctrines of Heaven at will. However, since truth can withstand scrutiny, it might be worthwhile to dedicate a few more pages to this topic, to reassure the sincere inquirer that sound reasoning and divine testimony genuinely and wholly align.
Whatever is revealed it becomes us to believe, and simply on this account, that it is revealed; if the subject of the revelation be mysterious or incomprehensible, this does not annul our obligation implicitly to believe it, because sufficient reasons may exist in the Eternal Mind for the concealment of its nature, or it may surpass the comprehension of our limited capacities; but if it be naturally capable of investigation--if it be not only a fact, but a fact in proof of which evidences may be adduced, and explanations furnished, our minds cannot be better employed, than in thus superinducing substantial evidence or vivid probability upon the testimony of divine inspiration.
Whatever is revealed, we should believe, simply because it is revealed. If the subject of the revelation is mysterious or hard to understand, that doesn't cancel our obligation to believe it implicitly. There may be good reasons in the Eternal Mind for keeping its nature hidden, or it might be beyond our limited understanding. However, if the subject can be investigated—if it's not just a fact but a fact that has evidence and explanations that can be provided—then our minds are best employed in adding substantial evidence or strong probability to the testimony of divine inspiration.
I. It is highly reasonable to suppose, that there are beings of a distinct and superior order to ourselves in the universe. Nothing can be more improbable than to imagine that this earth is the only inhabited region of universal empire, the only peopled province in the creation of God; especially when we observe that it forms but one, and that a small globe of matter belonging to a system in which others, and some very superior bodies, are found moving round the came centre, and legulated by similar laws; and that this whole system itself is but one out of ten thousand others that constitute the heavenly constellations, and "pave the shining way to the divine abode."
I. It makes a lot of sense to think that there are beings of a different and higher order than us in the universe. It’s hard to believe that Earth is the only inhabited place in the vast empire of the universe, the only populated area in God's creation; especially when we see that it is just one small globe of matter in a system that includes other, even greater bodies moving around the same center and governed by similar laws. Plus, this entire system is just one of countless others that make up the heavenly constellations and "pave the shining way to the divine abode."
The productions of Infinite Wisdom are wonderfully diversified. In the present world we have an opportunity of observing them only in the descending scale, from man, the summit of creation, down through all the gradations of animal existence, to the scarcely discernible insects that flit in the summer sunbeams, and to the minuter world of microscopic discovery. But analogy would lead us to infer, that there may be beings in the vast dominion of universal space as much superior to man as man himself is superior to insects or animalculæ. It is not probable that creative power should cease to operate precisely at the point where human existence commences; and especially as mind admits of incalculable diversity in the extent of its energies and capacities, and as it is found in all cases to possess a power of improvement and expansion, it is likely, under other circumstances and in other worlds, it may he inconceivably superior to the highest elevation it his ever attained in this lower region. Hence we infer the great probabilily of angelic existence.
The productions of Infinite Wisdom are wonderfully varied. In our current world, we can only see them on a descending scale, starting from humans, the peak of creation, down through all the levels of animal life, to the barely noticeable insects that dart in the summer sunlight, and down to the minute world of microscopic discoveries. However, we can reasonably assume that there could be beings in the vast universe that are as much superior to humans as humans are superior to insects or tiny organisms. It's unlikely that creative power would stop operating exactly where human existence begins, especially since mind allows for countless variations in its energies and capacities, and it is found to possess the ability for improvement and growth. It's likely that in different circumstances and in other worlds, that mind could be unimaginably superior to the highest level it has ever reached in this lower realm. Thus, we conclude that the existence of angels is highly probable.
II. It is reasonable to suppose, that superior intelligences were constituted free agents, and capable therefore of retaining or forfeiting their primeval character and happiness, for this is the evident lay of the rational creation, so far it comes within the limits of our observation. If this be the case, some of these beings may probably have misused their liberty, and become depraved and corrupt. It is essential to the notion of free agency, to suppose this possible, and though from the infinite benignity of the Divine Being, we should infer that he would create them holy and happy, we cannot conclude they must necessarily be preserved in such a state. There is nothing in the nature of the blessed God, as a just and holy Being, to require this, no obligation to do so resulting from the mere circumstance of their being thus created, and nothing, in a perfect system of holy government, to demand it. Indeed, quite the reverse, because it is natural to infer, that the subjects of divine government, however elevated in character and condition, should be responsible to their Ruler, and liberty of thought and action, the power of choice, and refusal of obedience and disobedience, is essential to responsibility. There may, therefore, probably exist unholy or evil spirits, such as have not kept their first estate, and consequently amenable to righteous laws, and proper objects of punishment.
II. It's reasonable to think that superior intelligences were created as free agents, which means they could keep or lose their original nature and happiness. This seems to be the clear structure of rational creation, at least as far as we can observe. If this is true, some of these beings might have misused their freedom and become corrupted. It's essential to the concept of free agency to consider this possibility. While we might assume, due to the infinite goodness of the Divine Being, that He would create them holy and happy, we can't conclude that they must necessarily remain in that state. There’s nothing in the nature of the blessed God, as a just and holy Being, that requires this, and no obligation exists solely because they were created that way, nor is there anything in a perfect system of holy governance that demands it. In fact, the opposite is likely true, as it’s natural to conclude that subjects of divine governance, no matter how elevated their character and condition, should be accountable to their Ruler. Freedom of thought and action, the power of choice, and the ability to obey or disobey are vital for accountability. Therefore, it’s probable that there are unholy or evil spirits that have not maintained their original state and are consequently subject to righteous laws and appropriate punishment.
III. As it is reasonable to suppose that the government of God may admit of the existence of fallen and evil spirits, as well as those of a more honourable class, it is equally so to conclude, that a similar or analogous variety of talent, capacity, and guilt may obtain to that which we observe in the constitution of other intelligent creatures both good and evil, in this world. Wicked men are not satisfied to be sought by criminals, they have no wish to be alone in sin but are uniformly anxious to seduce others into the perpetration of those iniquities which they themselves have dared to commit. The first action of Eve after her transgression, was to hand the forbidden fruit to her husband, and persuade him to eat, and it is the earliest wish of a rebellious heart to involve others in the guilt and misery of their own deeds, partly for the sake of concealing their enormity, by diverting the eye from observing the awful proportions of then individual offences, and partly to acquire encouragement and support in the commission of yet unpractised crimes. Hence "one sinner destroyeth much good." According to his capacity or opportunity he becomes the centre of a large circle of impious association, he sways inferior minds, and forms them into so many satellites round his person, who individually acquire a lustre from his pre-eminence, and feel the attraction of his base superiority. Hence the world of wickedness is ruled by an incalculable number of petty princes, who each assume independent empire, but all combine to carry on eternal war against the order of providence, the good of society, and the glory of God,
III. It’s reasonable to assume that God’s government might allow for the existence of fallen and evil spirits, just as it does for those who are more honorable. It’s equally valid to conclude that a similar variety of talent, ability, and wrongdoing exists among intelligent beings, both good and evil, in this world. Wicked people are not satisfied just to be pursued by criminals; they don’t want to be alone in their sins. They consistently try to lure others into committing the same wrongs they have dared to do. The first thing Eve did after her transgression was to give the forbidden fruit to her husband and persuade him to eat it. It’s a natural desire of a rebellious heart to involve others in their own guilt and misery, partly to hide the severity of their individual offenses and partly to gain encouragement and support for crimes they haven’t yet committed. Hence, "one sinner destroyeth much good." Depending on their ability or opportunity, they become the center of a broad network of wrongdoing, influencing weaker minds and drawing them in like satellites. Each one gains a bit of shine from their connection to this individual's prominence and feels the pull of their base superiority. Thus, the world of wickedness is led by countless minor rulers, each claiming their own power, all working together to wage a constant battle against divine order, societal good, and the glory of God.
It is not absurd, then, to conclude, that a similar diversity prevails amongst evil beings of a superior class, that some may be far more atrocious in their characters than others, and more capacitated to do extensive mischief. It is equally likely, that their influence over other evil spirits may be proportioned to these circumstances, and that their example or advice may excite to deeds of infernal daring. These considerations would eventually conduct us to the probability of the existence of one, pre-eminent above the rest in crime and in capacity, who may influence the several chiefs of the infernal empire, as they exercise a power over inferior demons; or that Satan, or the devil, is "the prince of the power of the air."
It’s not unreasonable to conclude that a similar variety exists among more powerful evil beings, where some may be much more heinous than others and have a greater ability to cause widespread harm. It’s also possible that their influence over other evil spirits varies accordingly, and that their actions or suggestions might encourage acts of extreme wickedness. These thoughts would ultimately lead us to consider the likelihood of a singular figure, one who stands out above the rest in both crime and ability, who may sway the various leaders of the underworld, just as they wield power over lesser demons; or that Satan, or the devil, is "the prince of the power of the air."
IV. The invisible nature of diabolical agency can be no sufficient objection to its existence. Admitting that there are other proofs, this circumstance could not diminish their force, much less destroy their evidence. It must be granted, that without other proofs it would be a radical objection, because in such a case the whole statement would he gratuitous and conjectural. If it were allowable to suppose such an agency, it might be equally so to refuse admitting it; every one may be amused or not with a pure fiction, an imaginary creation. But do not plead, that the invisibility of diabolical agency is any proof or any presumption of its reality; but simply that it is no objection, that it has no power to neutralize the evidence produced, and that unbelievers have no authority, on this account, to treat the subject with that profane and impertinent ridicule, which is a mere commonplace artifice to evade unwelcome convictions.
IV. The invisible nature of evil forces doesn't really count as a valid reason to deny their existence. Even if there are other proofs, this fact doesn't weaken their strength or dismiss the evidence. It has to be acknowledged that without additional proof, it would be a fundamental objection, as the entire claim would then be pointless and speculative. If we were allowed to imagine such a force, it would be just as acceptable to dismiss it; anyone can be entertained or not by a piece of pure fiction or an imaginary concept. But don’t claim that the invisibility of evil forces serves as any proof or presumption of their existence; rather, it simply isn’t an objection. It doesn’t diminish the evidence presented, and skeptics have no right to approach the topic with that irreverent and rude mockery, which is just a common tactic to avoid uncomfortable truths.
God is invisible--but is this any argument against his being? The human soul is invisible--is this a proof that it does not exist? The magnetic influence cannot be seen--is this a reason that it does not operate? Are the opinions or philosophers deduced from the analogies of nature, that suns and stars and systems occupy the distant regions of space, which have never yet been penetrated by the best constructed telescopes, rendered improbable by the allegation, that no eye and no instrument can discern them? The existence and operations of the devil are admitted to be invisible to sense, and in many cases, perhaps, difficult of investigation by reason--what then? Nothing.
God is invisible—but does that really mean He doesn't exist? The human soul is invisible—does that prove it isn't real? We can't see magnetic forces—does that mean they don't work? Do the theories of philosophers, based on the natural world, about suns and stars and systems in the far reaches of space—which even the best telescopes haven't been able to reach—become less likely just because no eye or instrument can see them? The existence and actions of the devil are accepted as invisible to our senses and, in many cases, maybe hard to understand through logic—so what? Nothing.
V. The supposition that the operation of invisible spirits is secret and imperceptible to ourselves, cannot be adduced as demonstrative against its reality. What is more difficult to ascertain than the operation of our own minds, and the motives by which we are impelled? Nor is it difficult only to trace the process of reasoning that has led us to any particular conclusion, and to recall the fleeting thoughts flinch have passed through the mind in rapid succession, so as to tell how we came to be influenced to a certain conclusion; but we often cannot discover what external objects or what incidental circumstances, first directed us into the inquiry, or led to the result.
V. The idea that the actions of invisible spirits are hidden and undetectable by us cannot be used as proof against their existence. What is harder to understand than the workings of our own minds and the reasons that drive us? It's not just challenging to follow the reasoning that brought us to a specific conclusion and to remember the quick thoughts that rushed through our minds, showing how we arrived at a certain idea; we also often struggle to identify what outside factors or random events initially prompted us to start questioning or led to the outcome.
Still more inconceivable is the manner in which spirit operates upon spirit, where there is no external agency; and it is inconceivable, because of our little experience on the subject, and because the usual modes of impression are through the medium of sense. The ear, the eye, the touch, convey impressions to the spirit; but when neither are sensibly affected, we cannot trace the influence exercised upon us, although it is highly irrational to deny its possibility. Besides, we know that "God, who is a Spirit, operates upon our souls at times and under circumstances, when we are unconscious of this influence; and, if we had no evidence from Scripture, reason must admit that such an operation is not improbable."
Still more unbelievable is how spirit influences spirit without any outside force; this seems unbelievable because we have so little experience with it, and because our usual ways of experiencing things involve our senses. The ear, the eye, and touch send impressions to the spirit, but when we aren't affected by these senses, we can't see the influence that impacts us, even though it's unreasonable to deny that it's possible. Furthermore, we know that "God, who is a Spirit, works on our souls at times and in situations when we are unaware of this influence; and even if we had no evidence from Scripture, reason must acknowledge that such an operation isn't unlikely."
The only objection which can arise here, is that of supposing the evil spirit in any respects independent of God; a supposition, however, which is not to be charged upon the advocates of diabolical agency. "It is evident," says Dr. Leland, "to the common sense of mankind, that there is a vast difference between the supposition of an almighty and independent evil being, a supposition full of absurdity and horror; and that of an inferior dependent being, who was made originally pure and upright, but fell by his own voluntary defection into vice and wickedness; and who, though permitted in many instances to do mischief, and to act according to his evil inclinations, as wicked men are often permitted to do in this present state, yet are still under the sovereign control of the most holy, wise, and powerful Governor of the world. For, in this case, we may be sure, from the divine wisdom, justice, and goodness, that God will, in the fittest season, inflict a punishment upon that evil being and his associates, proportionable to their crimes; and that in the mean time, he setteth bounds to their malice and rage, and provideth sufficient assistance for those whom they endeavour to seduce to evil, whereby they may be enabled to repel their temptations, if it be not their own faults; and that he will in his superior wisdom bring good out of their evil, and overrule even their malice and wickedness, for promoting the great ends of his government, This is the representation made to us of this matter in the Holy Scripture, nor is there any thing in this that can be proved to be contrary to sound reason. And we may justly conclude, that in the final issue of things, the wisdom as well as righteousness of this part of the divine administration will most illustriously appear."
The only objection that might come up is the idea of the evil spirit being in any way independent of God; however, this idea shouldn't be blamed on those who advocate for diabolical influence. "It is clear," says Dr. Leland, "to the common sense of people that there is a significant difference between imagining an all-powerful and independent evil being—an idea full of absurdity and horror—and that of a lesser, dependent being, who was originally created pure and upright but fell into vice and wickedness through his own choice. Even though this being is often allowed to cause harm and act on his evil tendencies, just as wicked people can in this world, he is still under the ultimate control of the most holy, wise, and powerful Governor of the universe. In this case, we can be assured, based on God's wisdom, justice, and goodness, that He will, at the right time, punish that evil being and his followers in proportion to their wrongdoings; and in the meantime, He sets limits on their malice and fury, providing enough support for those they try to lead into wrongdoing, enabling them to resist temptation unless it is their own fault. Also, in His greater wisdom, God will bring good from their evil and even use their malice and wickedness to advance the important purposes of His governance. This is how the matter is represented in Holy Scripture, and nothing here contradicts sound reason. We can rightly conclude that in the ultimate outcome, both the wisdom and righteousness of this aspect of divine administration will be most clearly revealed."
END.
Understood. Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.
Footnotes
7. This remarkable time cannot be stated with any certainty. The earliest antiquity determines nothing upon the subject. Towards the end of the second, or beginning of the third century only, was this attempted; when those who were most curious in their researches fixed it about the twentieth of May. Clemens Alexandrinus thinks that it was the twenty-eighth year after the battle of Actium; that is, the 41st year of Augustus; but Joseph Scaliger places it in his forty-second year; and, after a most laborious investigation, shows that Christ was born about the autumnal equinox, the latter end of September, or beginning of October. SCALIG. Animad. ad Chron. Euseb. p. 174, et seq.--It was not till the fourth century that this great event was believed to have occurred on the twenty-fifth of December. They have not failed to assign what they deemed important reasons for this decision. As the sun, they say, is then beginning to rise on our hemisphere, and again to approach our pole, it is the proper period to which the rising of the Sun of Righteousness should be referred. The Romans have another reason, deduced from the preceding. At the return of the sun the feast of the Saturnalia was celebrated at Rome. It was thought proper to substitute in the place of this feast, which was distinguished by its profane rejoicings, that of our Saviour's birth, for the purpose of inducing the people to separate joy from riot. It is, however, the event, and not the day, we celebrate. Comp. SAURIN, Discours Historiques, Critiques, &c. continuez par Beausobre, tom. ix. p. 146-148, 8vo.
7. This remarkable time can't be stated with any certainty. The earliest history doesn’t clarify much on the subject. It was only towards the end of the second century, or the beginning of the third, that this was attempted; those who were most curious in their research placed it around May 20th. Clemens Alexandrinus believed it was the twenty-eighth year after the Battle of Actium, which is the 41st year of Augustus; but Joseph Scaliger put it in his forty-second year, and after a thorough investigation, he argued that Christ was born around the autumn equinox, towards the end of September or the beginning of October. SCALIG. Animad. ad Chron. Euseb. p. 174, et seq.--It wasn’t until the fourth century that this significant event was thought to have occurred on December 25th. They provided what they deemed important reasons for this decision. They say that since the sun is beginning to rise in our hemisphere and approach our pole, it's an appropriate time to refer to the rise of the Sun of Righteousness. The Romans have another reason based on this. At the return of the sun, the Saturnalia festival was celebrated in Rome. It was thought appropriate to replace this celebration, which was marked by its profane festivities, with that of our Savior's birth, to encourage people to separate joy from excess. However, it is the event, and not the day, that we celebrate. Comp. SAURIN, Discours Historiques, Critiques, & c. continuez par Beausobre, tom. ix. p. 146-148, 8vo.
9. "This (wise men from the East) is not only an indefinite, but an improper version of the term. It is indefinite, because those called μαγοι were a particular class, party, or profession among the Orientals, as much as Stoics, Peripatetics, and Epicureans were among the Greeks. They originated in Persia, but afterward spread into other countries, particularly into Assyria and Arabia, bordering upon Judea on the East. It is probable that the Magians here mentioned came from Arabia. Now to employ a term for specifying one sect, which may with equal propriety be applied to fifty, of totally different, or even contrary opinions, is surely a vague way of translating. It is also, in the present acceptation of the word, improper. Formerly the term wise men denoted philosophers, or men of science and erudition: it is hardly ever used so now, unless in burlesque. Some say Magi; but Magians is better, as having more the form of an English word." CAMPBELL'S Translation of the Four Gospels, vol. ii. notes.
9. "The term (wise men from the East) is not only vague but also incorrect. It’s vague because those referred to as μαγοι were a distinct group or profession among the Orientals, just like Stoics, Peripatetics, and Epicureans were among the Greeks. They originated in Persia but later spread to other regions, especially Assyria and Arabia, which border Judea to the East. It’s likely that the Magians mentioned here came from Arabia. Using a term to specify one group that could just as easily refer to many, with completely different or even opposing beliefs, is certainly a vague translation. It’s also, in today’s context, incorrect. In the past, the term wise men referred to philosophers or learned individuals, but now it’s rarely used that way, except in a humorous context. Some prefer Magi; however, Magians is a better choice since it sounds more like an English word." CAMPBELL'S Translation of the Four Gospels, vol. ii. notes.
"Salvete, flores Martyrum,
Quos, lusis ipso in limine,
Christi insecutor sustulit,
Ceu turbo nascentes rosas.
"Hello, flowers of the Martyrs,
Whom, while playing right at the threshold,
The follower of Christ lifted,
Like a whirlwind lifting emerging roses.
Vos, prima Christi victima,
Grex immolatorum tener,
Aram ante ipsam, simplices,
Palma et coronis luditis."
You, first victim of Christ,
Gentle flock of the sacrificed,
Before the altar itself, simple ones,
You play with palms and crowns."
15. At my Father's εν τοις του πατρος μου Syriac [Hebrew], in domo patris mei. The Armenian version renders the words in the same manner. It has been justly observed that τα του δεινος is a Greek idiom, not only with classical writers, but with the sacred penmen, for denoting the house of such a person.... Campbell.
15. At my Father's εν τοις του πατρος μου Syriac [Hebrew], in domo patris mei. The Armenian version translates the words in the same way. It has been correctly pointed out that τα του δεινος is a Greek idiom, not just among classical authors, but also with the sacred writers, to indicate the house of a particular person.... Campbell.
17. Blackwall observes, "'Tis the opinion of some learned men, that the holy Jesus, the most tender and dutiful Son that ever was born, when he called his mother plainly woman, declared against those idolatrous honours which he foresaw would be paid her in latter ages, which is no improbable guess. But in the more plain and unceremonious times it was a title applied to ladies of the greatest quality and merit by people of the greatest humanity and exactness of behaviour. So Cyrus the Great says to the queen of the Armenians, Ἀλλὰ σὺ ᾆ γὺναι: and servants addressed queens and their mistresses in the same language." Blackwall's Sacred Classics, V. ii. p. 206. second edit.
17. Blackwall observes, "Some educated people believe that when the holy Jesus, the most caring and devoted Son ever born, referred to his mother simply as woman, he was rejecting the idolatrous honors that he predicted would be given to her in later ages, which isn’t an unlikely interpretation. However, in more straightforward and less formal times, this title was used by people with the highest respect and politeness to refer to women of the greatest status and merit. For example, Cyrus the Great addresses the queen of the Armenians with Ἀλλὰ σὺ ᾆ γὺναι: and servants would use the same language when addressing queens and their mistresses." Blackwall's Sacred Classics, V. ii. p. 206. second edit.
22. The bishop of Meux, who has been already quoted, does not fail to suggest some delectable additions to her titles. He speaks in one of his discourses of her "sacred body, the throne of chastity, the temple of incarnate wisdom," &c. but the whole paragraph shall be introduced, though perhaps it had better remain untranslated:--"Le corps sacr de Marie, le trône de la chastité, le temple de la sagesse incarneé, l'organe du Saint-Esprit, et le siége de la vertu du Très-Haut, n'a pas dû demeurer dans le tombeau; et le triomphe de Marie seroit imperfait, s'il s'accomplissoit sans sa sainte chair, qui a été comme la source de sa gloire. Venez done, Vierges de Jésus Christ, chastes épouses du Sauveur des ames, venez admirer les beautés de cette chair virginale, et contempler trois merveilles que la sainte virginité opère sur elle. La sainte virginité la préserve de corruption; et ainsi elle lui conserve l'être: la sainte virginité lui attire une influence céleste, qui la fait ressusciter avant le temps: ainsi elle lui rend la vie: la sainte virginité répand sur elle de toutes parts une lumière divine; et ainsi elle lui donne la gloire. C'est ce qu'il nous faut expliquer par ordre;" and he does explain these trois merveilles in a manner well calculated to satisfy every Papist, and to sicken every Protestant. Vide Serm. pour l'Assumpt. de la Vierge, P. 2.
22. The bishop of Meux, already mentioned, doesn’t hesitate to suggest some appealing additions to her titles. He talks in one of his sermons about her "sacred body, the throne of chastity, the temple of incarnate wisdom," etc., but the whole paragraph should be included, even though it might be better left untranslated:--"Le corps sacr de Marie, le trône de la chastité, le temple de la sagesse incarneé, l'organe du Saint-Esprit, et le siége de la vertu du Très-Haut, n'a pas dû demeurer dans le tombeau; et le triomphe de Marie seroit imperfait, s'il s'accomplissoit sans sa sainte chair, qui a été comme la source de sa gloire. Venez done, Vierges de Jésus Christ, chastes épouses du Sauveur des ames, venez admirer les beautés de cette chair virginale, et contemplez trois merveilles que la sainte virginité opère sur elle. La sainte virginité la préserve de corruption; et ainsi elle lui conserve l'être: la sainte virginité lui attire une influence céleste, qui la fait ressusciter avant le temps: ainsi elle lui rend la vie: la sainte virginité répand sur elle de toutes parts une lumière divine; et ainsi elle lui donne la gloire. C'est ce qu'il nous faut expliquer par ordre;" and he does explain these trois merveilles in a way designed to satisfy every Catholic and to upset every Protestant. Vide Serm. pour l'Assumpt. de la Vierge, P. 2.
27. Gen. xxxiii. 18, 19, Josh. xxiv. 32. This place was the metropolis of the tribe of Ephraim. It was destroyed by Abimelech, but rebuilt by Jeroboam, who made it the seat of the kingdom of Israel. It was afterward called Neapolis; and Vespasian or Domitian having established a colony there, it received the Roman appellation of Flavia Cesarea. Herod gave it the name of Sebaste.
27. Gen. xxxiii. 18, 19, Josh. xxiv. 32. This place was the capital of the tribe of Ephraim. It was destroyed by Abimelech but was rebuilt by Jeroboam, who made it the center of the kingdom of Israel. It was later called Neapolis; and after Vespasian or Domitian established a colony there, it was given the Roman name Flavia Cesarea. Herod named it Sebaste.
30. "Living water, ὑδως χων. It may surprise an English reader, unacquainted with the Oriental idiom, that this woman, who appears by the sequel to have totally misunderstood our Lord, did not ask what he meant by living water, but proceeded on the supposition that she understood him perfectly; and only did not conceive how, without some vessel for drawing and containing that water, he could provide her with it to drink. The truth is, the expression is ambiguous. In the most familiar acceptation, living water meant no more than running water. In this sense, the water of springs and rivers would be denominated living, as that of cisterns and lakes would be called dead, because motionless. Thus, Gen. xxvi. 19. we are told, that Isaac's servants digged in the valley, and found there a well of springing water. It is living water, both in the Hebrew and the Greek, as marked on the margin of our Bibles. Thus also Lev. xiv. 5. what is rendered running water in the English Bible, is in both these languages living water. Nay, this use was not unknown to the Latins, as may be proved from Virgil and Ovid. In this passage, however, our Lord uses the expression in the more sublime sense of divine teaching, but was mistaken by the woman as using it in the popular acceptation." CAMPBELL'S Trans. of the Four Gospels, vol. ii. p. 518, notes.
30. "Living water, ὑδως χων. It might surprise an English reader, unfamiliar with the Eastern way of speaking, that this woman, who by the end seems to completely misunderstand our Lord, didn't ask what he meant by living water, but instead assumed she understood him perfectly; she just couldn't figure out how, without a container for drawing and holding that water, he could give her something to drink. The truth is, the term is ambiguous. In its most common meaning, living water simply referred to running water. In this sense, water from springs and rivers would be called living, while that from cisterns and lakes would be termed dead, since it's still. For example, in Gen. xxvi. 19, we learn that Isaac's servants dug in the valley and found a well of springing water. It is living water, in both Hebrew and Greek, as noted in the margin of our Bibles. Similarly, in Lev. xiv. 5, what is rendered as running water in the English Bible is living water in both of these languages. This usage was not unfamiliar to the Romans, as evidenced by Virgil and Ovid. However, in this passage, our Lord uses the term in a more elevated sense of divine teaching, while the woman misinterprets it in the common way." CAMPBELL'S Trans. of the Four Gospels, vol. ii. p. 518, notes.
31. "It is no unusual practice with the Jews; we often have heard of it. R. Jonathan and R. Jannai were sitting together; there came a certain man, [Hebrew], and kissed the feet of R. Jonathan." Again, "R. Meir stood up, and Bar Chama, [Hebrew], kissed his knees, or feet. This custom was also used by the Greeks and Romans, among their civilities and in their salutations." GILL in loc. Consult also HARMER'S Observations, vol. ii. chap. 6.
31. "This is a common practice among the Jews; we've often heard of it. R. Jonathan and R. Jannai were sitting together when a certain man, [Hebrew], came and kissed the feet of R. Jonathan." Again, "R. Meir stood up, and Bar Chama, [Hebrew], kissed his knees or feet. This tradition was also practiced by the Greeks and Romans as part of their social customs and greetings." GILL in loc. See also HARMER'S Observations, vol. ii. chap. 6.
33. "There is in these denominations no inconsistency. By birth she was of Syrophenicia, so the country about Tyre and Sidon was denominated, by descent of Canaan, as most of the Tyrians and Sidonians originally were; and by religion a Greek, according to the Jewish manner of distinguishing between themselves and idolaters. Ever since the Macedonian conquests, Greek became a common name for idolater, or at least one uncircumcised, and was held equivalent to Gentile. Of this we have many examples in Paul's epistles, and in the Acts. Jews and Greeks, Ἑλληνες, are the same with Jews and Gentiles" CAMPBELL'S Transl. of the Gospels in loc. notes.
33. "There is no inconsistency in these titles. By birth, she was from Syrophenicia, which is the region around Tyre and Sidon, and she was descended from Canaan, as were most of the Tyrians and Sidonians originally; and by religion, she was considered a Greek, according to the Jewish way of distinguishing between themselves and idolaters. Since the Macedonian conquests, the term Greek became a common label for idolater or at least for someone uncircumcised, and was viewed as equivalent to Gentile. We see many examples of this in Paul's letters and in the Acts. Jews and Greeks, Ἑλληνες, are the same as Jews and Gentiles." CAMPBELL'S Transl. of the Gospels in loc. notes.
34. The question has been often agitated, whether the possessions of the New Testament are to be ascribed to demoniacal influence, or whether they are so represented in conformity to the popular prejudices of the age, being in reality nothing more than diseases. Surely a distinct existence must be attributed to these, as evil spirits, when we consider their number, the actions particularly ascribed to them, the conversation which they held respecting themselves, the Son of God, and their own destiny, the desires and passions they are represented as manifesting, and various other circumstances of their history. Is it credible, that a mere disease should be said to have addressed Christ in such language as the following: "What have we to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of God? Art thou come hither to torment us before the time?" Comp. Matt. viii. 29, and the succeeding verses.
34. The question has often been raised about whether the possessions mentioned in the New Testament are due to demonic influence or if they are just portrayed this way because of the popular beliefs of the time, being in reality nothing more than illnesses. Clearly, we must recognize a distinct existence for these beings as evil spirits when we look at their numbers, the specific actions attributed to them, the conversations they had about themselves, the Son of God, and their own fate, the desires and emotions they are said to express, and various other details of their story. Is it believable that a mere disease would be described as addressing Christ with words like, "What do we have to do with you, Jesus, Son of God? Have you come here to torment us before the time?" See Matthew 8:29 and the following verses.
45. Acts xvi. "Philippi was a city of Macedonia near the confines of Thrace. It lies near the sea, as it were at the head of the Archipelago. It was so named from Philip, king' of Macedon, who repaired and enlarged it; but its more ancient name was Dathos. It was also called Crenides from its numerous springs, whence flowed the river mentioned Acts xvi. 13; κρηνη, kreenee, in Greek meaning a spring. Julius Cæsar is said to have planted there a Roman colony; and the neighbourhood of Philippi was the scene of conflict between him and Pompey, and afterward between his assassinators, Brutus and Cassius, and his partizans, Antony and Octavius. It is said still to retain some monuments of its former splendour, although it is much depopulated and sunk to decay." Bevan's Life of the Apostle Paul, p. 367.
45. Acts xvi. "Philippi was a city in Macedonia near the border of Thrace. It’s close to the sea, almost at the start of the Archipelago. It was named after Philip, the king of Macedon, who rebuilt and expanded it; however, its original name was Dathos. It was also known as Crenides because of its many springs, from which flows the river mentioned in Acts xvi. 13; κρηνη, kreenee, in Greek meaning a spring. Julius Caesar is said to have established a Roman colony there, and the area around Philippi was the site of battles between him and Pompey, and later between his assassins, Brutus and Cassius, and his supporters, Antony and Octavius. It is said to still have some remnants of its former glory, although it is now largely abandoned and has fallen into decay." Bevan's Life of the Apostle Paul, p. 367.
49. The purple die is called in I Maccab. iv. 23, purple of the sea, or sea purple; it being the blood or juice of a turbinated shell-fish, which the Jews call [Hebrew] Chalson; this they speak of as a shell-fish. Hence those words 'Go and learn of the Chalson, for all the while it grows, its shell grows with it:' and that purple was died with the blood of it, appears from the following instances: The best fruits in the land, Gen. xliii. 11, are interpreted, the things that are the most famous in the world, as the Chalson, &c., with whose blood, as the gloss on the passage says, they die purple: and the purple died with this was very valuable, and fetched a good price. The tribe of Zebulon is represented as complaining to God, that he had given to their brethren fields and vineyards, to them mountains and hills; to their brethren lands, to them seas and rivers: to which it is replied, All will stand in need of thee because of Chalson; as it is said, Deut. xxxiii. 19 They shall suck of the abundance of the seas; the gloss upon it, interpreting the word Chalson is, it comes out of the sea to the mountains, and with its blood they die purple, which is sold at a very dear price.... It may be further observed, that the fringes which the Jews wore upon their garments, had on them a riband of blue or purple. Numb. xv. 38, for the word there used is by the Septuagint rendered the purple, in Numb. iv. 7, and sometimes hyacinth; and the whole fringe was by the Jews called [Hebrew], purple. Hence it is said, 'Does not every one that puts on the purple (i.e. the fringes on his garments) in Jerusalem make men to wonder? and a little after, the former saints or religious men, when they had wove in it (the garment) three parts, they put on it [Hebrew], the purple. And there were persons who traded in these things, and were called, [Hebrew], sellers of purple, as here; that is, for the tzitzith, or fringes for the borders of the garments, on which the riband of blue or purple was put, as the gloss explains it. The Jews were very curious about the colour and the dying of it, that it should be a colour that would hold and not change, and that the riband be died on purpose for that use. Maimonides gives rules for the dying of it, and they were no less careful of whom they bought it; for they say that the purple was not to be bought, but of an approved person, or one that was authorized for that purpose; and a scruple is raised by one, whether he had done right or no in buying it of the family of a doctor deceased. Now, since Lydia might be a Jewess, or, at least, as appears by what follows, was a proselytess of the Jewish religion, this might he her business, to sell the purple for their fringes, and, it may be, the fringes themselves. GILL in loc.
49. The purple dye mentioned in I Maccabees 4:23 is referred to as purple of the sea or sea purple. This dye comes from the blood or juice of a type of shellfish known in Hebrew as Chalson; the Jews describe it as a shellfish. Hence the saying, "Go and learn from the Chalson, for as it grows, its shell grows with it." It is evident that purple dye was made from this shellfish's blood, as shown in the examples: The best fruits in the land, Genesis 43:11, are interpreted as the most renowned items in the world, including the Chalson, &c., which is noted in the gloss on the passage as being used to dye purple; this purple was highly valued and fetched a high price. The tribe of Zebulon is depicted as complaining to God because He gave their brothers fields and vineyards while they received mountains and hills; their brothers got land, while they were given seas and rivers. It is answered that everyone will rely on them because of the Chalson, as stated in Deuteronomy 33:19, They shall suck of the abundance of the seas; the gloss interprets Chalson as coming from the sea to the mountains, with its blood used for purple dye, which is sold at a very high price. Additionally, the fringes that the Jews wore on their garments included a ribbon of blue or purple. Numbers 15:38 uses a term in the Septuagint that is translated as the purple, and in Numbers 4:7, it is sometimes called hyacinth; the entire fringe was referred to by the Jews as [Hebrew], purple. Therefore, it is said, "Doesn't everyone who puts on the purple (meaning the fringes on their garments) in Jerusalem attract attention?" Later, it is noted that the earlier saints or religious individuals, after weaving three parts into the garment, would add [Hebrew], the purple. There were people who traded these items, known as [Hebrew], sellers of purple, which refers to the tzitzith or fringes for garment edges, where the blue or purple ribbon was attached, as explained in the gloss. The Jews were very particular about the color and dyeing process, ensuring it was a color that would hold and not fade, and that the ribbon was dyed specifically for that purpose. Maimonides set rules for the dyeing process, and they were equally cautious about whom they purchased it from; they stated that the purple should only be bought from a trusted or authorized source, and there was a debate about whether it was acceptable to buy it from the family of a deceased doctor. Since Lydia might have been a Jewess or, as indicated later, a convert to Judaism, it is likely that her business involved selling purple dye for the fringes, or possibly the fringes themselves. GILL in loc.
77. Shraddha, or Pinda, is an offering made to the manes of any deceased person, on an appointed day after his or her death. It consists of rice, and other article, often made into cakes, and is continued annually for seven generations by all his or her descendants, called Sapinda, and in some cases to fourteen generations by all the descendants, who, when beyond the seventh generation, are called Sakoolya.
77. Shraddha, or Pinda, is an offering made to the spirits of any deceased person on a specific day after their death. It consists of rice and other items, often shaped into cakes, and is performed annually for seven generations by all their descendants, known as Sapinda. In some cases, it continues for up to fourteen generations by all the descendants, who, when they go beyond the seventh generation, are referred to as Sakoolya.
78. The following law, from the same book, will show how uncleanness for death or birth must be observed in the different casts: viz. If a person die, or if a child be born, the Sapinda shall be unclean ten days for a Brahmman, twelve for a Kshetra, fifteen for a Bysha, and one month for a Soodra: during which time they can make no offering to their ancestors or the gods.
78. The following law, from the same book, illustrates how uncleanliness due to death or birth must be observed among the different castes: If someone dies, or if a child is born, the Sapinda will be unclean for ten days for a Brahman, twelve days for a Kshatriya, fifteen days for a Vaishya, and one month for a Shudra: during this time, they cannot make any offerings to their ancestors or the gods.
82. A person with such diseases, accidents, or sins cannot have the rite of burning his body performed till an offering of atonement has been made, which qualifies him for having his obsequies performed; viz. Dahon or burning (in which case the wife may die with him,) and the Shraddha, or Pinda. This, however, does not gain such on one admission into bliss, which is only done by the Sahemaron, or the wife's dying with him.
82. A person with such illnesses, accidents, or wrongdoings cannot have the rite of burning their body performed until a ritual of atonement has been completed, which prepares them for their funeral rites; namely, Dahon or burning (in which case the wife may die alongside him), and the Shraddha, or Pinda. However, this does not lead to entry into bliss, which can only be achieved by the Sahemaron, or the wife dying with him.
Download ePUB
If you like this ebook, consider a donation!